Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A.
There were some vocabulary mastery strategies with regard to the students problems on
vocabulary, strategy of teaching vocabulary was one of the aspects that influenced the
achievement of teaching vocabulary. Using good strategy of teaching helped the students to be
mastered vocabulary, for example by using Cubing strategy.
Cubing strategy was a strategy used by the teacher to provide opportunities for the
students to use and share their thinking about new vocabularies. Bloom (2008) added that cubing
was an effective strategy that gave teachers a precise language for communicating the outcomes
of their learning instruction in teaching vocabulary. Therefore, the researcher could see whether
cubing strategy was one of strategy could be effective to help students in learning vocabularies.
Based on explanation above, the researcher was interested to conduct the research
entitled The Effect of Using Cubing Strategy toward Students Vocabulary Mastery at the
Fifth Grade of SDN 002 Bala Merah Pelalawan.
B.
considered it difficult.
Limitation of the Research
Based on the phenomena stated above, the researcher limited the study on the Effect of
using Cubing Strategy toward memorizing English vocabulary namely noun, adjective, and verb
at the fifth grade of SDN 002 Bala Merah Pelalawan.
D.
It is: Do the students at the fifth grade of SDN 002 Bala Merah Pelalawan
taught vocabulary by using Cubing Strategy achieve better than the students
who were not taught by using Cubing Starategy?
E.
using Cubing Strategy learning in achieving the students vocabulary mastery. Those were
described as follows;
1.
combining the makeup language. It is very important for the students in learning English
especially for communication to construct the meaning and making a language. When someone
has good vocabulary it means that he/she is familiar with large number of words, and uses them
in appropriate and accurate terms. According to Leaver at all (2005:162) states that vocabulary is
the building block of the language learning. It means vocabulary mastery facilitates the learners
to be able to speak, read, write, and listen. Linse (2006:121) vocabulary is the collection of
words that an individual knows. It means that vocabulary is the total number of words or phrases of
language, including single words, compound words, and idioms that individual knows.
young learners are the learners between five and twelve years old. They are often more
enthusiastic and lively as learners and they want to please the teacher rather that the peer group.
Moreover, Phillips (2003) says that young learners are the children from the first year of formal
schooling (five or six years old) to eleven or twelve years of age. In this case, young learners are
those who are in the first until the sixth in the elementary school.
Gordon (2007:76) states that young childrens are capable of learning foreign language
words at a relatively fast rate. It means the students in elementary school can learn foreign
language words faster than adult learner when they learn that word subconsciously as they learn
their mother tongue language, such as when they are playing word games, rather than memorize
a large number of words. From the principles above in teaching process, the teacher should be
able to identify who the students are, what their needs are, and how the teacher should teach in a
simple and interesting way. Different age of students indicate that they also have different needs
and interest.
In teaching vocabulary, the teacher must be able to select the words that will be given to
the students, according to the curriculum and the goal of teaching. In application, the materials
which are given have been selected to the students need that used in real life. As a good teacher,
it is important to know how to teaching vocabulary because vocabulary is the ability masters a
lot of words to make communications with other people. In order to communicate well in a
language, students should acquire an adequate number of words and should know how to use
them accurately. The more vocabulary the learners have the easier for them to develop their four
skills.From the explanation of some experts above, it can be concluded that by using a strategy
in teaching words to young learner can help them to understand the word that they learned.
3.
Kinds of Vocabulary
According to Eckersley (1960:3) there are eight kinds of vocabulary. It is stated one the
part of speech. They are noun, pronoun, adjective, verb, adverb, preposition, conjunctions, and
interjection.
Noun
Pronoun
Adjective
Verb
: the word that expresses the idea of action or being that affirms
or suffers something.
e.g : boys played football, he is hungry.
Adverb
: the word that can be added to a verb to make its meaning clearer,
fuller or more exact. e.g : he ran quickly.
Preposition
: the word that is used with noun or pronouns and show the
relationship between the noun or pronoun and other word, often
expressing abstract relationship of case or of time of place.
e.g : the desk was near the window.
Conjunction
Interjection
a.
words. An adjective usually precedes the noun or the pronoun which it modifies.
e.g: happy, big, high, low, small, red, black
b. Noun is a word used to name a person, animal, place, thing, and abstract idea. Nouns are usually
the first words which small children learn. e.g: bag, chair, book, board.
c.
Verb is the word that expresses the idea of action or being that affirms that person or thing is,
does or suffers something. e.g: eat, drink, get, give, take, run.
4.
teachers. There are some expert ideas that discuss about teaching vocabulary. Allen (1999:17)
says that teaching vocabulary is teaching new labels for familiar concepts. For example, if our
students already know the concept about fair/unfair, so we are teaching vocabulary with the
words like discrimination, bias and stereotyping by using the concept. On the other hand, if our
students totally unknown the concept. So, more time will be required to develop a meaning full
understanding. It means that in teaching vocabulary the teacher must know the concept in
teaching vocabulary.
Cubing strategy is a strategy that used by the teacher to provide opportunities for the
students to use and share their thinking about new vocabularies. Bloom (2008) adds that cubing
is an effective strategy that gives teachers a precise language for communicating the outcomes of
their learning instruction in teaching vocabulary. Caulfield and Jennings (2005:44) define that
cubing is a strategy to make some instructions on the cube template to help students think what
they have been read and memorize. It helps the students to identify different levels of thinking
and questioning and is a valuable tool for building students critical and creative thinking skill. In
the taxonomy, the acts for recalling and reporting knowledge are seen as less sophisticated than
the alternatives of translating information into new forms. However, the students can understand
in a new discipline ought to be encouraged to practice the full array of higher-order thinking
skill.
According to Houff (2010:73) there are five advantages of Cubing strategy in teaching
vocabulary.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
1. The teacher explains the material of the students about vocabulary topics.
2. The teacher asks the students to find appropriate topic that related with the material on books.
3. The students choose the type of role-playing they would like to do. Cubes may very with tasks or
commands that are appropriate to the level of readiness of the group.
4. The students choose teacher designed task from the choice board from the teachers and also uses a
wild card to design a learning activity related to the topic about vocabulary.
5. Students write 13-15 minutes on each of the six sides of a cube. The intent of cubing as to have
students generates more ideas or perspectives.
6. Then, the students make the list of vocabularies on their friends cube.
For example the topics about: House
Garage:
Car
Bicycle
Bathroom:
soap
Tooth brush
House
Kitchen:
Stove
Plate
Bedroom:
Bed
Pillow
Living Room:
Chair
TV
List of Vocabularies:
HOUSE
-House
-Living room
-Chair
-TV
-Garage
-Bathroom
-Soap -Bicycle
-tooth brush
-bedroom
-bed
-Pillow
-Kitchen
-Stove
-Plate
-Car
B.
strategy:
The first, Hasanah (2013) conducted the research entitled Teaching English Vocabulary
Using Cubing Strategy at the Fourth Grade of SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimahi in Academic Year
2012-2013. She found that mean score of pretest was 66.41, mean score of posttest was 86.67
and tobserved was 8.62. The ttable with df=n-1 (39-1=38) and significance level at 0.05 was
1.70. Based on the data analysis above, the alternative hypothesis of this research was accepted
because tobserved was higher than ttable (8.62>1.7). It also means that teaching English
vocabulary using cubing strategy was effective to increase the studentsvocabulary mastery at the
fourth grade students of SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimai in academic year 2012-2013.
The second, Firdaus (2011) conducted the research entitled The Use of Cubing Strategy to
Improve the Students Understanding on English Vocabulary (A Classroom Action Research
With The Fourth Graders of SDN 01 Mulyoharjo Jepara In The Academic Year 2010/2011). He
found that the average of the students achievement was 57,4. In the first cycle there are about
64% or many of students joined the class, and the average of the students achievement was 64,7.
In the second cycle there are about 74% or almost majority of the students joined in the class, the
average of the students achievement was 71,8. In the third cycle there are 80% or majority of
students joined the class, the average of the students achievement was 75,7. Based on the result
of the analysis, the researcher can conclude that the use of cubing strategy is recommended for
the English teacher, especially for elementary school teachers to attract the students interest and
to improve their knowledge in learning English.
The third, Abdul (2011) conducted the research entitled The Use of Cubing Strategy in
Teaching Vocabulary (An Experimental Study with the Seventh Grade Students of Mts Darul
Ulum Srikandang Bangsri, Jepara In The Academic Year Of 2011-2012). He found that the pretest average of the experimental group was (62.1) and control group was (63.62). While, the
post-test average of the experimental group was (82.58) and control group was (64.88). The
obtained t-test was (24.34), whereas the t-table was (2.00) for a = 5%. The t-test score was higher
than the t-table (24.34 > 2.00). It was meant that Ha was accepted while Ho was rejected. Since
t-test score was higher than the t-table, the use of cubing strategy was effective strategy in
Conceptual Framework
Dealing with the research, researcher conceptualized the research to ease conducting the
research. The direction begun with the observation, pre-test, treatments, and post-test. The
preliminary research was interview before giving pre-test to the students.
Figure 2.1
Conceptual Framework of the Research
Post-test
Pre-test
Observationn
Treatment
Result
D.
1.
Hypotheses
Null hypotheses (Ho)
There is no significant effect of using Cubing Strategy toward students
vocabulary
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A.
control group design. The most commonly used of quasi experimental designs in educational
research could be represented as:
Experimental
O1
O2
------------------Control
O3
O4
Cohen (2007: 283)
This design required at least two groups, each of which was formed by assignment but not
random assignment. Both groups was administrated a pre-test and each group receives different
treatment. Both groups was tested at the end of the study. Post-test score was compared to
determine the effectiveness of the treatment. This research consisted of two variables; the
independent variable symbolized by X that is the use of cubing strategy and the dependent
one as Y which referred to students vocabulary mastery. In brief, the research designed by
following table.
Table 3.1
The Table Quasi Experimental Research
Class
Pre-test
Control
Experiment
Treatment
T
Post-test
Where:
E
: Experimental Group
: Control Group
X1 and Y1
X2 and Y2
B.
Pelalawan. Number of the students for the fifth grade were 91 students. SDN 002 Bala Merah
Pelalawan has three classes for the fifth grade. The population can be seen in the following table:
Table 3.2
The Population of Research
No
Class
Number of Students
Mean Score
V.A
27 Students
70.49
V.B
29 Students
70.14
V.C
31 Students
69.12
91 Students
A sample was part of the population being examined at the time of research. Thus, the
sample of research should be less than the population. The sample must have the characteristics,
which represented all the population being observed in the research. In other words, the sample
was a subject of individuals or cases from a population. It enabled the researcher to collect and
organize the data more effectively and practically. In this research, researcher determined the
classes based on students based score to see students had equal ability. After calculating the
score, researcher got the result that students average score of class V.A was 70.49, while class
V.B was 70.14. It showed both of classes had equal ability. Then researcher took randomly as
sample of research. Researcher took two classes as the sample of this research by using lottery,
before doing that, researcher committed the first taken out was experiment class and the second
was control class. Those are V.A became the experimental group and V.B became the control
group.
Table 3.3
Sample of the Research
No
1
2
3
C.
Class
Participants
Mean Score
Class
V.A
V.B
Total
27 Students
29 Students
56 Students
70.49
70.14
Experimental
Control
Pelalawan. It was conducted in January to March 2015. Based on the time allocation on syllabus,
there were five meetings consisting seventy minutes for each (5 x 70 minutes) to teach
vocabulary. Therefore, this research ran two weeks in five meetings and to conduct experimental
class of using Ball toss. The schedules of this research are showed in table 3.4:
Table 3.4
The schedules of the Research
No
Meeting
Meeting 1
(28 January 2015)
Meeting 2
(4 February 2015)
Meeting 3
(11 February 2015)
Meeting 4
(18 February 2015)
Activity
Participant class
Pre-test
Teaching Adjective by
Using Cubing strategy
about Noun
Teaching Noun by Using
Cubing strategy about
Adjective
Teaching Verb by Using
Cubing strategy about
Verb
Treatment
class
Treatment
class
Treatment
Class
Meeting 5
(25 February 2015)
Meeting 6
(4 March 2015)
D.
Treatment
Class
Post-test
research, the instrument was test. The test was constructed in form multiple choices. The test was
given to the students at the pre-test and post test in both of the classes.
Table 3.5
Blue print of Test
Pre-Test
E.
Post-Test
Adjective
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Adjective
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Noun
8,9,10,11,12,13,14
Noun
8,9,10,11,12,13,14
Verb
15,16,17,18,19,20
Verb
15,16,17,18,19,20
instrument of this research. The number item test consisted of 20 questions. The high score was
100. So for each the correct answer was scored 5. The specification of the test items were taken
from the syllabus of the fifth grade of SDN 002 Bala Merah Pelalawan. The researcher used
these instruments to know the effect of the Cubing strategy.
F.
: Spost- Spre
Smaks-Spre
Note :
Spost : Posttest Score
Spre
: Pretest Score
Category
High
Middle
Low
Meltzer 2002
Next, it was to analyze the data of pre-test and post-test that used software Statistical
Package for Social Science (SPSS) for windows version 20.0. Before hypothesis test, first was
done normality test distribution data and homogeneity variance data both classes. Testing
normality distribution data in this research was done using test Kolmogorove Smirnov (KS-21)
in program SPSS version 16.0 while Levene Test for testing homogeneity of sample. The
continue after normality test and homogeneity test as follow:
1.
T-test
T-test was a parametric statistic used to test the hypothesis, comparative average of two
samples, when the data are interval or ratio form. T-test was used when data was normal and
homogeneous. To determine the normal and homogenous data used normality and homogeneity
a.
test.
Normality test
Normality test was needed to determine the distribution of data. Normality data is known
through the equitable distribution of regression of each value. One of methods was used to test
the normality of data is Kolmogorov Smirnov (KS-21) KS=I| Fn(yi-1) F0 (yi)|
Note:
KS
: Value of KS
Value calculated KS < KS table accept H0 then it means a simple regression model of data or
multiple regression followed a normal distribution and conversely if the value calculated KS >
KS table then reject H0 it means that a simple regression model of data or multiple regression
did not follow a normal distribution. (Sugiyono 2010:156)
b.
Homogeneity test
Homogeneity test was performed to determine the equality of research data. In a regression
analysis of research data that either should have a homogeneous distribution of data and method
used to test the Levene test.
(N-K) ni ( - k)2
L=
(K-1) (Vij- k)2
Vij = XijNote:
L
: Levene Value
X
: Residual data Value
: Residual data mean
N
: Amount of sample
K
: Amount of group
(Sugiyono 2010:147)
The value of Levene counting obtained is then compared with Levene table or can also use
a significant comparison with alpha value of 5%. If the value of Levene count < Levene table or
P value > 5% of the data a simple regression or multiple regression has a homogenous variety.
On contrary, if the value of the Levene > Levene table or P value < 5% then data regression
simple or multiple regression that does not have homogenous variety. And the hypothesis by Ttest formula as below:
Note :
t
= t-test
2.
U Mann-Whitney test
U-test was used to test the comparative hypothesis of two independent samples when data
are ordinal form, If in an observation interval of the form data, then it needed to be changed first
into ordinal data. When the data is still shaped interval, we can use T-test to test, but if the
assumption of T-test is not match (must be normal), then this test can be used. There are two
formulas that are used for testing; both of formulas are used in calculation, it is used to determine
the price of U whichever is smaller. U price smaller that are used for testing and comparing with
the U table.
U1 = n1.n2 + - R1
U2 = n1.n2 + R2
Noted:
n1
: Amount of simple 1
n2
: Amount of simple 2
U1
: Amount of level 1
U2
: Amount of level 2
R1
R2