Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1K 2R1
(First received October 1996; accepted in revised form August 1997)
AbstractA model turbid water was treated by coagulation-occulation and sedimentation, with
Moringa oleifera seeds as a coagulant, using jar tests. The quality of the treated water was analyzed
and compared with that of the water treated with alum. Experiments were conducted at various dosages
of the crude 5% water extract of both dry, shelled and non-shelled Moringa oleifera seeds. Measurements of pH, conductivity, alkalinity, cation and anion concentrations, showed that coagulation with
Moringa oleifera seeds did not signicantly aect the quality of the treated water. However, concentration of organic matter in the treated water increased considerably with the dosage of Moringa solution. Since this organic matter might exert a chlorine demand and also act as precursor of
trihalomethanes during the disinfection with chlorine, it is suggested that Moringa oleifera seeds be
used as a coagulant in water and wastewater treatment, only after an adequate purication of the active
proteins. # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Key wordscoagulation-occulation, natural coagulants, Moringa oleifera, cationic proteins, vegetable
oil
INTRODUCTION
782
modern technology to supply it to water and wastewater treatment industry at cheaper cost.
Previous studies have focused mainly on the eciency of Moringa oleifera seeds as a coagulant, but
there is a need for a systematic evaluation of the
quality of the water treated by the crude water
extract of Moringa oleifera seeds. The purpose of
the present study is hence to examine various parameters of the quality of the water treated by coagulation using Moringa oleifera seeds, and
compare them with that of the water treated with
alum.
Tap water
7.3
1.0 NTU
150.0 m mho cm1
4.4 mg l1
52.0 mg l1 as CaCO3
46.0 mg l1 as CaCO3
48.0 mg l
21.0 mg l1
11.0 mg l1
7.4 mg l1
0.4 mg l1
0.5 mg l1
pH
Turbidity
Conductivity
Acidity
Alkalinity
Total hardness
Calcium (Ca2+)
Magnesium (Mg2+)
Chloride (Cl)
Sulphate (SO2
4 )
Nitrate (NO
3)
Phosphate (PO3
4 )
7.6
105 NTU
154.0 m mho cm1
4.7 mg l1
53.0 mg l1 of CaCO3
59.0 mg l1 of CaCO3
52.0 mg l1
22.0 mg l1
12.0 mg l1
8.0 mg l1
0.4 mg l1
0.5 mg l1
Shelled seeds
Non-shelled seeds
6.4
1500.0
246.0
14.5
47.9
13.4
42.9
3.0
19.0
9.0
110.0
208.0
4760.0
15000.0
1193.0
5.8
1700.0
60.0
15.2
30.6
24.4
63.6
5.0
11.0
8.0
140.0
187.0
3678.0
9630.0
802.0
783
Coagulation experiments
Jar test is the most widely used method for evaluating
and optimizing the coagulation-occulation processes
(Kawamura, 1991a; Bratby, 1980). This study consists of
batch experiments involving rapid mixing, slow mixing
and sedimentation. The Phipps and Bird jar test apparatus
was used in all the coagulation experiments. Glass beakers
of 1 litre lled with the model turbid water were used. The
apparatus allowed six beakers to be agitated simultaneously, and rotational speed could be varied between 0
and 100 rotations per minute (RPM), thus allowing simulation of dierent mixing intensities and resulting occulation process.
In a typical run, beakers were lled with one litre of the
model turbid water, placed on the oc illuminator and agitated at the preselected intensity of rapid mixing. During
rapid mixing, the coagulant dosage was added into each
beaker using Eppendorf pipettes. The duration of rapid
mixing was controlled with a stopwatch. After rapid mixing, the preselected intensity of slow mixing was quickly
established and its duration was controlled again with the
stopwatch. After slow mixing, the beakers were carefully
removed from the oc illuminator and were placed in a
safe place for the sedimentation phase to take place. In
this study, the intensity and duration of both rapid mixing
and slow mixing were xed respectively at 100 RPM for
2 min in the case of rapid mixing and 40 RPM for 20 min
in the case of slow mixing. The duration of sedimentation
was kept constant at 30 min. All experiments were run at
room temperature (20218C) and no pH control was exercised.
784
Fig. 1. Flow diagram showing the processing protocol of dry Moringa oleifera seeds.
Water quality parameters and equipment
Quality parameters of the water, treated by coagulation
either with Moringa oleifera seeds or with alum, were
measured following the sedimentation phase using
Standard Methods (APHA et al., 1992). The parameters
analyzed were turbidity, pH, conductivity, alkalinity, cation concentration (Ca2+, Mg2+), anion concentration
3
(Cl, SO2
4 , PO4 , NO3 ), organic compounds measured by
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Ultraviolet (UV)
absorbance at 280 nm, and sludge volume produced.
Turbidity measurements were conducted using a Hellige
turbidimeter. The pH was measured using a Hach-One pH
meter. Conductivity was measured using a Hach conductivity meter. Cation and anion concentrations were analyzed using a Hach spectrophotometer, Model DR 2000.
COD was measured using the same spectrophotometer
after a digestion period of 2 h in a Hach tube digester at
1508C. UV absorbance was measured using a UV/Visible
Cecil spectrophotometer, Model CE 599.
The same equipment was used to characterize the crude
water extract of Moringa oleifera seeds, as shown in
Table 3. If needed, dilution with distilled water was used.
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) was measured using a carbon analyzer apparatus, Dohrmann, Model DC-80. K+,
Na+, and Fe3+ were determined using an atomic absorp-
785
Fig. 2. Turbidity removal by coagulation with non-shelled Moringa oleifera seeds (NSMOS), shelled
Moringa oleifera seeds (SMOS), and alum (ALUM).
non-shelled Moringa oleifera seeds (NSMOS), corresponding to 50 and 500 mg l1, assuming that all
the seed material and the alum powder were entirely
solubilized and actively participated in the coagulation process. This is true for alum, but for
Moringa oleifera seeds, only 25% of the mass was
dissolved during extraction. For this reason, it was
decided to express the coagulant dosage in ml l1
throughout this study.
At optimum dosage, turbidity decreased from 105
to 10 NTU, corresponding to a turbidity removal of
90% in the case of alum, SMOS and NSMOS.
Compared with USEPA Standards (1991), which
state that the turbidity of drinking water should be
less than 1 NTU, the value of 10 NTU is quite
excessive. This means that sedimentation alone is
not enough to eliminate the ocs and that some
sort of ltration too has to be used for treating this
water. Flocs formed during rapid mixing were visible to the naked eye during slow mixing reaching a
diameter of approximately 1 to 2 mm. They settled
rapidly during the 30 min sedimentation period.
The dierence in optimum dosage between
shelled and non-shelled dry Moringa oleifera seeds
suggests that the active proteins are contained only
in the kernel. The average weight of the dry
Moringa oleifera seeds was 0.23 g and the kernel
represented 70 percent of the total mass, leaving
30% for the husk. As already shown in Table 3, the
crude water extract of Moringa oleifera seeds contained 1193 mg l1 of TKN in the case of shelled
seeds, and only 802 mg l1 of TKN in the case of
non-shelled ones. It may be noted that the protein
concentration is generally proportional to the TKN
concentration. As the optimum dosage was 10 times
greater in the case of non-shelled seeds, it is possible that some active proteins were denatured by
adsorption on the husk particles during extraction,
when the non-shelled seeds were processed. Thus,
shelled seeds are more suitable for further processing than non-shelled ones.
Quality of the treated water and sludge volume
Figure 3 to 5 show various parameters analyzed
on the treated water. As in the case of turbidity,
results of each parameter for non-shelled Moringa
oleifera seeds (NSMOS), shelled Moringa oleifera
seeds (SMOS) and aluminum sulphate (ALUM) are
plotted on the same graph for better comparison.
Each point in the graphics represents the average of
at least three measurements.
As can be seen from Fig. 3(a), Moringa oleifera
seeds did not aect signicantly the pH value,
which remained almost constant at 7.6 for all
dosages tested. In contrast, the pH value decreased
from 7.6 to 4.2 for alum, which means that in practical terms, further chemical addition is necessary in
order to correct the pH of the nished water to
values between 6.5 and 8.5 (USEPA, 1991).
From Fig. 3(b), it can be seen that Moringa oleifera seeds, both shelled and non-shelled, did not signicantly change the conductivity of the treated
water, which remained constant at 150 m mho cm1
for all dosages tested.
In contrast, the conductivity increased considerably form 150 to 842 m mho cm1 with the increasing dosage of alum. This increase in conductivity is
caused by sulphate ions remaining in the treated
water. As can be seen, the lowering of pH and
increase in conductivity in the case of alum puts
this chemical coagulant at a relative disadvantage
compared to Moringa oleifera.
Figure 3(c) shows the variation of alkalinity of
the treated water as a function of coagulant dosage.
Alkalinity remained almost constant in the case of
Moringa oleifera seeds, whereas it decreased rapidly
for 53 to 0 mg l1 (as CaCO3) in the case of alum.
The decrease in pH, alkalinity, and increase in ionic
strength are closely related and could cause an
786
Fig. 3. Quality of water treated by coagulation with dry Moringa oleifera seeds and alum: (a) pH value,
(b) conductivity, (c) alkalinity, and (d) sludge volume.
imbalance in the water chemistry thus initiating corrosion problems in the distribution network
(Degremont, 1989). It is common practice in water
treatment using alum to add alkalinity in the form
of bicarbonate or lime which increases the sludge
volume as well as the treatment costs. With
Moringa oleifera, it is not necessary to add any
other chemicals, as can be concluded from the experimental results.
Figure 3(d) shows the variation of the sludge
volume produced as a function of coagulant dosage.
At the optimal dosage of 1 ml l1 the shelled
Moringa oleifera seeds produced 1.5 ml of sludge,
whereas alum produced 7.6 ml. NSOMS produced
an even lower sludge volume of 1 ml at its optimum
dosage of 10 ml l1. The larger sludge volume in the
case of alum (4 to 5 times), compared to Moringa
oleifera, can be explained by the production of
aluminum hydroxide as a precipitate. In the case of
Moringa oleifera, only initial suspended particles
787
Fig. 4. Quality of water treated by coagulation with dry Moringa oleifera seeds and alum: (a) orthophosphates, (b) sulphates, (c) chlorides, and (d) nitrates.
even be used in chemical dephosphatation of wastewaters (Weber, 1972). In this respect, it may be disadvantageous to use Moringa oleifera as it increases the
orthophosphate content of the treated water.
Concentration of sulphate ions in the treated
water is shown in Fig. 4(b) as a function of coagulant dosage. Neither SMOS nor NSMOS aected
the sulphate concentration, whereas alum increased
it considerably from 12 to 90 mg l1. USEPA
Standards (1991) for drinking water limit the concentration of sulphates at 250 mg l1 due to taste as
well as laxative considerations of sulphates in
water. The implication of sulphate ions in the
increase of conductivity has already been mentioned. Higher sulphate ion concentration means
also an increase in non-carbonate hardness in the
nished water which runs the risk of scale formation in boilers and other warm water appliances
(Degremont, 1989).
Figure 4(c) shows chloride ions in the treated
water as a function of coagulant dosage. They
788
Fig. 5. Quality of water treated by coagulation with dry Moringa oleifera seeds and alum: (a) magnesium, (b) calcium, (c) chemical oxygen demand, and (d) absorbance at 280 nm.
789
790
REFERENCES
791