Sage
Back to Basics
Choosing Process
Vacuum Pumps
Don Couuns:
Epwaabs Lt.
Vacuum pumps are an integral part of many
industrial facilities. Both processing objectives and
budget constraints must be considered when
‘acaum, or sub-atmospherie pressure, is used in a
\ ] wide range of chemical processing and manufactur-
ing applications. This article is an introduction to
‘the main vacuum pump technologies suitable for use in the
chemical process industries (CPI). It offers basic selection
‘guidance for wet and dry vacuum systems, and discusses
system design, safety issues, and typical applications.
Use of vacuum in chemical processing
‘A vacuum system can affect every aspect of process,
such as utility consumption, processing times, quality, safety,
and environmental impact. The benefits of vacuum include:
+ reduced energy consumption and reduced risk of
heat damage to sensitive products by lowering processing
temperatures.
+ enhanced product quality through impurity removal
+ safer operating atmospheres through oxygen exclusion
+ inereased yield by shifting reaction equilibrium
+ simplified product transfer in pneumatic conveying and
‘iting
The design of the vacuum system, including pumps,
piping, controls, and other aecessories, is determined by
process parameters and evacuation requirements. Correct
sizing is vital to ensure thatthe processing objectives, such
as vacuum pressure, pumping speed, and budgets, are met
Vacuum technologies
CPI vacuum technologies include wet and dry mechani-
cal pumps. Wet technologies require lubrication fis, such
as oil or water. The lubrication fluid must be changed regu-
larly and disposed of appropriately, as it frequently becomes
contaminated with process fluid
selecting a specific pump.
Dry vacuum pumps do not use any lubricant in the swept
volume. They havea lower environmental impact, require
less maintenance, and are often more reliable than oil-sealed,
‘pumps in the CPI, For these reasons, dry vacuum is used to
pump some of the most aggressive and problematic gases in
abroad range of chemical processes.
Pumps that discharge to atmospheric pressure are
referred to as primary pumps, These may be used alone or
with a secondary pump that creates a higher vacuum or more
pumping speed,
recess Gas niet
Cold Guard Ring
Cooling fr
Body =<
Ejector Stage eee
To Backing Condenser
‘and Primary Pump
Eso
“A Figure. Vapor boosters equice a primary pump and generate medium
tobigh vacuum,
CEP Agesi2012 weuscrocmiep CBBack to Basics
Wet vacuum technologies
‘The traditional wet process vacuum technologies used
in the CPI include vapor boostrs, steam ejeetors liquid-
ring pumps, and oil-sealed pumps such as rotary-piston and.
rotary-vane types.
Vapor boosters can provide high pumping speeds at very
low pressures of 107 to 10-* mbar more economically than
other vacuum technologies
‘A vapor booster (Figure 1) is a secondary pump, and
requires initial pumpdown by 2 primary pump. During
pampdown, a mechanical primary pump evacuates the vapor
booster to below its critical backing pressure (ie, the vapor
booster’s maximum allowable exhaust pressure, typically
below 1 mbar) The pump id is vaporized by the
boilertheater: As the vapor rises and passes through the eone-
shaped jet stages, it generates a pressure of about § mbar
within he jet assembly. Vapor streams exit the jet assembly
av ahigh velocity, then condense onthe cooled walls ofthe
{jot and ejector stage cones and drain into the base of the
‘pump for recirculation
The process gas enters the vapor booster through the
ppump's inlet port. A portion ofthe gas becomes trapped
in the vapor steam leaving the top jetstage. The gas is
compressed asi travels from one stage to the next, and exits
the pump by passing through the ejector stage and into a
backing condenser. The gas is then removed by the backing
pump (Le. a type of vacuum pump that increases the pres-
sure fo an intermediate value orto atmospheric pressure).
The cooled surface of the guard rng above the first jt stage
traps and condenses pump fuid vapor and minimizes its
backstreaming into the vacuum system.
‘Steam ejects have three basic parts: a nozzle, a suction
chamber, and a mixing diffuser (Figure 2). A high-pressure
motive fuid (usually steam) passing through the nozzle
enirains low-pressure vapor from the suction chamber and
discharges it at an intermediate pressure to another ejector
or condenser, orto the atmosphere. Unless the process vapor
is the same as the motive Suid, a large amount of effluent is
usually generated, Additional effluent i generated if spray
condensers are used to condense the combined steam and
process vapor between ejectors or atthe system exhaust.
Steam ejectors are known fortheic high reliability and
robustness in arduous and corrosive environments, and
provide rough to medium vacuum with high suction eapa~
VACUUM PRESSURES AND TERMINOLOGY
+ Rough vacuum: 1,013 to 1 mbar (760 to 1 tor)
* Medium vacuum: 1 to 10°? mbar (1 to 10° ton)
‘* High vacuum: 10-* to 10°F mbar (10° to 10°? tor)
“* Uttrahigh vacuum: 107 mbar and below (=107 tort)
BE wowscheowgienp Augst2012 CRP
bilities. However, they can be very sensitive to variations in
process conditions and pressure, and they tend to suffer from
low thermal efficiency, making them expensive to operate.
‘A single-stage ejector cannot provide a low enough
‘vacuum for some processing applications, such as active
pharmaceutical ingredient (APD) production and refinery
service. Multistage ejectors with director indirect interstage
condensation are an alternative, but these require very large
‘quaottes of steam and cooling water. This makes for high
energy and water bills, and it usually creates a condensate
contaminated with process vapor that requires appropriate,
costly disposal.
Although steam is widely used in the CPI, ejector sys-
tems that use fluids other than steam are also available (eg
airejectors).
J one rue
soe
exson
cot
vrai
su
Oma
‘A Figure 2. Te stam ejector const of tree basic pars nzze, a
suction chamber, anda mixing citser,
Suction Discharge
ee |
Qutlet Port
Direction of Rotation
‘A Figure 3. The vertically oft rotor of iquld-ing pump eats @
Diston-ike action a the rng rises and fal
ae
ff
‘4 Figure
ume af
then esta
Inet St
ing
00
wate
‘a Figur
staioron
Lig
athe li
set roto
ring is
LRI
singles
the proj
ccapacit
(water)
dry met
pressun
LR)
(ie..up1. Induction
I
PE om
4, Exhaust
YS \ 3. Compression a
‘4 Figure 4 sealed rtary-pston ad rotary-vane pumps draw a
‘volume of gas ito the pum, isolate it in an encased camber, compres,
then edaust the gas to crea a vacuum
Splash Fitter
Inet Straner.
| Beraust valve
‘and Cover
Hinge Pin Stator
Drive Shaft
Cam
tary Piston
Cooling
Water Col
‘A Figure 5. na rtary-pston pur, he pston moves around a circular
stalor ona otating cam
Liquid-ring vacuum pumps (LRPs) use water, oil, ot
other liquids as a sealing fluid (Figure 3). The vertically off
set rotor creates a pumping action (ike a piston) asthe liquid
ring rises and falls.
TERPS can have compression ratios of up to 10:1 ina
single stage and up to 30:1 in two stages, depending on
‘the properties of the liquid used, They are available with
capacities up to 50,000 m'/h and pressures down to 33 mbar
(vater) oF 10 mbar (oil). LRPs may be combined with
dry mechanical booster pumps or steam ejector for low-
pressure operations
ERPS can handle high vapor temperaiures and loads
(e,, up to a 10°C temperature rise inthe seal Fi), have
Exhaust Outlet
; | A
Ol VS)
D wi A
~ Pump oilin
Oi Reservoir
‘4 Figure 6, Arotary-vane pump has two blades that force ges eround a
Cireular stator; asthe rotor tums, the tps of the blades aren contact with
‘he ol-ubrcaed stator wal
ow noise and vibration levels, and can be built in a variety
cof materials for wide chemical compatibility
‘Traditional once-through LRPs require a large amount of |
sealing fluid, which can become contaminated with process
‘materials, making it difficult or costly to dispose of, Partal-
‘recirculation oF total-reciroulation systems help to mitigate
this problem. Furthermore, LRPS tend to cavitate when the
seal fluid vapor pressure approaches the system pressure:
this can cause severe damage to the pump.
Oileseated rotary-piston and rotary-vane pumps dif
fer slightly in design but operate on the same principle, As
shown in Figure 4, a volume of gas is drawn into the pump
(induction), trapped in an enclosed chamber (isolation),
pushed around the pump (compression), and forced out of |
the pump (exhaust)
In arotary-piston pump, the piston moves around a
circular stator on a rotating, eccentrically mounted cam
(Figure 5). A thin film of oil is maintained between the ratat-
ing components for lubrication
The rotary-vane design consists of an eccentrically
‘mounted rotor in a cylindical-bore stator (Figure 6). The
rotor has two blades that slide in opposite slots, and as the
rotor turns, the tips of the blades are in contact with the
oil-lubricated stator walls. These pumps can have one- or
two-stage designs,
Introduced to reduce the costs associated with the dis-
posal of contaminated wastewater from steam cjectors and
liquid-ring pumps, oil-sealed pumps initially were a reliable
and popular alternative. These pumps offer a high ultimate
vacuum to 10 mbar and neat-constant volumetric capacity.
However, as environmental standards have become more
CEP fagsi2012 wonsdteowiop CF——— | = |) it fb "i inin
Back to Basics
sttict around the world, the intensive maintenance associ
ated with oil changes and disposal has become a significant
disadvantage of the technology.
Backstreaming of oil — the migration of oil vapor from.
the pump back into the process — ean occur in normal
operation, which can reduce process cleanliness. For this
reason, oi-sealed pumps are usually not the best choice for
‘chemical processing applications,
Mechanical dry vacuum pump technologies
‘Modern dry vacuum pumps have nonlubricated, non-
contacting mechanical impeller designs; the most common
types are screw, claw, and roots. The key advantage of al
dry pump technologies is tha they do not use water or oil for
sealing ot lubrication of the vacuum stages, This eliminates
‘the risk of process contamination and the expense of effluent