Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
(Chair - School of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship), Professor and Director, Institute for
Entrepreneurship and Career Development, Bharathidasan University, Khajamalai Campus, Tiruchirappalli620023
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, B.S.Abdur, Rahman University (Deemed), Vandalur,
Chennai- 600048,
3
Senior Programme Co-ordinator, IECD, Bharathidasan University, Khajamalai, Campus, Tiruchirappalli620023
4
Research Scholar, Department of Lifelong Learning, Bharathidasan, University, Khajamalai Campus,
Tiruchirappalli-620023
ABSTRACT: Skill development training provided for the educated youths will maximize the merits of
education system in India with productivity and employability skills expected by organizations and institutions
in a developing country like India. The present study is used to analyze about the impact of skill development
training provided to 63 school teachers from secondary and primary schools of Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu. A
structured questionnaire was used in this study to explore the results with the help of statistical package for
social science (SPSS). From the study it is revealed that the skill development is essential for younger
generation to improvise their opportunities in the field of computer science in their career and for their future.
Keywords: Skill Development, Impact of Training programme
I.
India is one of the developing nations having more number of youth populations than other countries.
Existing employee are also provided with skill development training through state and central government
schemes. There is a great demand in skill development for economical and technological changes globally. Skill
development includes a wide variety of activities through many institutions which are having a positive
influence in earning and updating present employment status of the employees. For this purpose, skill
development should be provided with the current education system through vocational and technical education.
Most of the organizations provide on-job training and short term courses to develop the employees skill
development along with the non-government and government organizations.
Skill development will overcome the social disadvantages like skill gap and skill-illiteracy.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2013, in their report that skill
development training programmes generates high skilled employees, development in skill level, enhancing their
level of performance in knowledge-intensive service field like schools and colleges, potential growth in specific
field. It develops a common platform for services like technical education, designing, architecture and so on.
According to Ministry of Human Resource Development, (2015), in their National Policy for Skill
Development and Entrepreneurship prefaced the 68th Independence Day speech of Honorable Prime
Minister of India, Shri. Narendra Modi, that, 54% of Indian Population who are employing comes under the age
group of 25 years and 62 % of people who are employing ranges from the age group between 15 to 59. It is
estimated that the average age of youth population in India are increased by 32% in future years, it will create
huge demand and challenge in employment opportunity. India at present faces many challenges in skilled
workforce and unemployment of educated-low skilled youths. Hence India should meet the desire of the Indian
youths in skills, so that India can easily moves towards the global-knowledge-economy.
II.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Richard Garrett and et. al, (2010), reported that there is a positive association between the skilled
employees and their workplace performance. Appropriate and sufficient skills supplied to the employees results
in reaching the organizational goal and individual skill development. It results in pre-requisite success in the
field of productivity, finance and good quality outcome.
Green Anne E., and Martinez-Solano Laura E., (2011), in their research reported that management
and other institutions raises the demand for skills in their global environment gradually, to improve their
productivity and economy. Investing the skills in employees can be personalized and specialized skills in
management to diversify and expand their organizations. Young employees should acquire necessary skills for
their self-development in their career. Organizations and institutions may update the skill requirements with
their organizational objectives to achieve the skill requirements.
www.ijbmi.org
65 | Page
V.
There were 63 school teachers from private schools of in and around Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, who were
the participants and also the respondents of the training programme conducted by the IECD, Bharathidasan
University. There were 49 female and 14 male teachers among them. The training programme conducted
especially for the school teachers who are the in-charge for SUITS programme conducted by IECD,
Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli.
Marital Status
Age
Category
Male
Female
Total
Single
Married
Widow
Total
20 to 25 Years
26 - 30 Years
www.ijbmi.org
Frequency
14
49
63
27
35
1
63
29
15
Percentage
22.2
77.8
100.0
42.9
55.6
1.6
100.0
46.0
23.8
66 | Page
Educational Qualification
Religion
Monthly Income
Type of Family
31-40 Years
41 Years and above
Total
Under Graduate
Post Graduate
Above Post Graduate
Total
Hindu
Christian
Muslim
Total
Below Rs.5000/Rs. 5001 to Rs.7500/Rs. 7501 Rs. 10000
Rs. 10001 and Above
Total
Nuclear
Joint
Total
No Experience
1-4 Years
5 Years and Above
Total
15
4
63
24
34
5
63
44
16
3
63
20
16
18
9
63
39
24
63
19
27
17
63
23.8
6.3
100.0
38.1
54.0
7.9
100.0
69.8
25.4
4.8
100.0
31.7
25.4
28.6
14.3
100.0
61.9
38.1
100.0
30.2
42.9
27.0
100.0
Table-1 shows that 77.8% of the respondents are female and 22.2% are male. 46% of respondents
belong to the age group 20 to 25 years, 23.8% belongs to 26 to 30 years, 23.8% belongs to 31 to 40 Years and
only 6.3% are above the age of 41 years.55.6% of respondents are married and 42.9% are unmarried. 54% of
employees are post graduates and 38% are under graduates. 69.8% of the respondents belongs to Hindu religion,
25.4% are Christians and 4.8% are Muslims.
31.7% of the respondents are getting their monthly income upto Rs. 5000/-, 25.4% respondents
getting their income ranges from Rs. 5001 to 7500/-, 28.6% of the respondents are getting the income ranges
from Rs. 7501 to 10,000/- and only 14.3% of the respondents getting their income above Rs. 10001/- . 61.9% of
the respondents of the respondents belongs to nuclear family and 38.1% of the respondents belong to joint
family. 42.9% of the respondents are having working experience upto 4 years, 27% of the respondents having
the experience above 5 years and 30.2% of the respondents having no experience.
Encouraged
Interaction
Participation
Topics covered
context
Easy to
contents
follow
to
present
and
and
day
organized
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Sum of
Squares
.939
13.918
14.857
.435
18.644
19.079
.821
20.925
21.746
1.203
20.511
21.714
.386
11.932
12.317
.035
11.394
www.ijbmi.org
df
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
Mean
Square
.313
.236
.145
.316
.459
.274
.355
.772
.401
.348
1.154
.129
.202
.636
.012
.193
.060
Sig.
1.327
0.274
0.712
0.514
0.335
0.595
67 | Page
Teach
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
11.429
1.435
17.835
19.270
.254
21.175
21.429
.075
17.639
17.714
.141
34.271
34.413
.567
16.290
16.857
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
0.980
.478
.302
1.582
.085
.359
.236
.025
.299
.084
.047
.581
.081
.189
.276
.684
0.203
0.871
0.969
0.970
0.565
Table-2 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-1 is accepted and concluded that, there is no significant
variance among the age and the impact of skill development training programme of the respondents.
Hypothesis-2
There is no significant variance among the experience and the impact of skill development training programme
of the respondents.
Table -3 ANOVA showing the variance among Experience and the Impact of Training Programme of the
respondents
Impact of Skill Development Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Comfortable
provided
and
adequate
facilities
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum of
Squares
.389
14.469
14.857
.109
18.970
19.079
1.183
20.563
21.746
2.025
19.689
21.714
.428
11.890
12.317
.350
11.079
11.429
.095
19.175
19.270
.422
21.007
21.429
.341
17.373
17.714
.297
34.116
34.413
.952
15.905
16.857
df
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
Mean
Square
.194
.241
.055
.316
.173
.592
.343
1.727
1.012
.328
3.085
.214
.198
1.079
.175
.185
.948
.047
.320
.149
.211
.350
.602
.171
.290
.589
.149
.569
.261
.476
.265
1.796
Sig.
.806
0.452
0.842
0.187
0.053
0.346
0.393
0.862
0.551
0.558
0.771
0.175
Table-3 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-2 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the experience and the impact of the skill development training programme of
the respondents.
Hypothesis- 3
www.ijbmi.org
68 | Page
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum of
Squares
.041
14.816
14.857
.018
19.061
19.079
.409
21.337
21.746
1.020
20.694
21.714
.409
11.908
12.317
.041
11.388
11.429
.454
18.816
19.270
.367
21.061
21.429
.010
17.704
17.714
1.637
32.776
34.413
.653
16.204
16.857
df
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
Mean
Square
.041
.243
.018
.312
.058
.409
.350
1.170
1.020
.339
3.008
.409
.195
2.097
.041
.187
.219
.454
.308
1.470
.367
.345
1.064
.010
.290
.035
1.637
.537
3.047
.653
.266
2.458
Sig.
.168
0.683
0.810
0.284
0.088
0.153
0.642
0.230
0.306
0.852
0.086
0.122
Table-4 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-3 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the gender and the impact of skill development training programme of the
respondents
Hypothesis- 4
There is no significant variance among the educational qualification and the impact of skill development
training programme of the respondents
Table 5 ANOVA Showing the Variance among the Educational Qualification and the Impact of Training
Programme of the Respondents
Impact of Skill Development Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Sum of
Squares
1.040
13.817
14.857
.292
18.788
19.079
1.083
20.663
21.746
.085
21.629
21.714
.225
www.ijbmi.org
df
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
Mean
Square
.520
.230
.146
.313
.466
.542
.344
1.573
.043
.360
.118
.113
.559
Sig.
2.258
0.113
0.630
0.216
0.889
69 | Page
Comfortable
provided
and
adequate
facilities
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
12.092
12.317
.278
11.151
11.429
.815
18.454
19.270
.160
21.269
21.429
.699
17.016
17.714
2.815
31.598
34.413
.194
16.663
16.857
.081
12.776
12.857
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
.202
0.575
.139
.186
.747
.408
.308
1.326
.080
.354
.226
.349
.284
1.232
1.407
.527
2.672
.097
.278
.350
.041
.213
.191
0.478
0.273
0.799
0.299
0.077
0.706
0.827
Table-5 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-4 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the educational qualification and the impact of skill development training
programme of the respondents.
Hypothesis-5
There is no significant variance among the religion and the impact of skill development training programme of
the respondents.
Table-6 ANOVA showing variance among Religion and the Impact of the Training Programme of the
Respondents
Impact of Skill Development Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Comfortable
provided
and
adequate
facilities
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum of
Squares
.321
14.536
14.857
.504
18.576
19.079
.165
21.581
21.746
.315
21.400
21.714
.054
12.263
12.317
.035
11.394
11.429
.171
19.098
19.270
.582
20.847
21.429
.714
17.000
17.714
2.269
32.144
34.413
.304
16.553
16.857
www.ijbmi.org
df
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
Mean
Square
.161
.242
.252
.310
.813
.082
.360
.229
.157
.357
.441
.027
.204
.133
.017
.190
.091
.086
.318
.269
.291
.347
.838
.357
.283
1.261
1.134
.536
2.117
.152
.276
.551
Sig.
.663
0.519
0.448
0.796
0.645
0.876
0.913
0.765
0.438
0.291
0.129
0.579
70 | Page
Encouraged
Interaction
Participation
and
follow
and
organized
Teach
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum of
Squares
.457
14.400
14.857
.527
18.552
19.079
1.278
20.468
21.746
.288
21.426
21.714
.679
11.638
12.317
.199
11.230
11.429
.986
18.284
19.270
.447
20.982
21.429
.510
17.204
17.714
.053
34.360
34.413
.389
16.468
16.857
df
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
2
60
62
Mean
Square
.229
.240
Sig.
.263
.309
.852
.639
.341
1.874
.144
.357
.403
.340
.194
1.751
.099
.187
.531
.493
.305
1.618
.223
.350
.638
.255
.287
.889
.026
.573
.046
.195
.274
.709
.952
.392
.432
.162
.670
.182
.590
.207
.532
.416
.955
.496
Table-7 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-6 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the marital status and the impact of skill development training programme of
the respondents.
Hypothesis-7
There is no significant variance among the type of family and the impact of skill development training
programme of the respondents.
Table-8 ANOVA Showing the variance among type of Family and the Impact of the Training Programme
Impact of Skill Development Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Encouraged
Interaction
Participation
and
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Sum of
Squares
1.780
13.077
14.857
.836
18.244
19.079
.044
www.ijbmi.org
df
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
Mean
Square
1.780
.214
.836
.299
2.795
.044
.124
Sig.
8.304
.005
.100
71 | Page
Comfortable
provided
and
adequate
facilities
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
21.702
21.746
2.782
18.933
21.714
.061
12.256
12.317
.929
10.500
11.429
.244
19.026
19.270
2.659
18.769
21.429
.445
17.269
17.714
2.579
31.833
34.413
.665
16.192
16.857
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
1
61
62
.356
.726
2.782
.310
8.962
.061
.201
.304
.929
.172
5.395
.244
.312
.783
2.659
.308
8.643
.445
.283
1.572
2.579
.522
4.943
.665
.265
2.505
.004
.583
.024
.380
.005
.215
.030
.119
Table-8 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-7 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the type of family and the impact of skill development training programme of
the respondents.
Hypothesis-8
There is no significant variance among the monthly income and the impact of skill development training
programme of the respondents.
Table-9 ANOVA showing the Variance among the monthly income and the Impact of the Training Programme
Impact of Skill Development Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Encouraged
Participation
and
Interaction
Topics covered to present day
context
Easy to
contents
follow
and
organized
Teach
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Sum
of
Squares
.870
13.988
14.857
.092
18.988
19.079
1.529
20.217
21.746
1.393
20.321
21.714
2.302
10.015
12.317
.012
11.417
11.429
1.138
18.132
19.270
1.367
20.061
21.429
1.264
16.450
17.714
.609
33.804
www.ijbmi.org
df
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
62
3
59
Mean
Square
.290
.237
.031
.322
.095
.510
.343
1.488
.464
.344
1.349
.767
.170
4.521
.004
.194
.021
.379
.307
1.234
.456
.340
1.341
.421
.279
1.512
.203
.573
.354
Sig.
1.223
.309
.962
.227
.267
.006
.996
.305
.270
.221
.786
72 | Page
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
34.413
.885
15.972
16.857
62
3
59
62
.295
.271
1.090
.361
Table-9 shows that the significant values of the impact of the training programmes variables are
greater than the significant level, hence hypothesis-8 is accepted and it is concluded that, there is no
significant variance among the monthly income and the impact of skill development training programme
of the respondents.
Table-10 Distributions of the Respondents according to their Impact of the Skill Development Training
Programme
Statements on Impact of Skill Development
Training Programme
Clearly Defined Objectives
Encouraged Participation and Interaction
Topics covered to present day context
Easy to follow and organized contents
Utilization of distributed materials
Effective Training experience in the field of
computer science
Familiar Training topics assigned to the Trainees
Well Prepared Trainees Teach Practical &
Theory
Satisfied Training Objectives
Sufficient allotment of training time
Comfortable and Adequate Facilities provided
Consolidated Average of the Impact of
Training Programme (100%)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
39 (61.9)
40 (63.5)
35 (55.6)
36 (57.1)
21 (81)
48 (76.2)
24 (38.1)
21 (33.3)
25 (39.7)
24 (38.1)
11 (17.5)
15 (23.8)
2 (3.2)
3 (4.8)
3 (4.8)
1 (1.6)
-
Strongly
disagree
-
39 (61.9)
39 (61.9)
22 (34.9)
21 (33.3)
2 (3.2)
3 (4.8)
31 (49.2)
23 (36.5)
45 (71.4)
61.5%
31 (49.2)
27 (42.9)
18 (28.6)
34.5%
1 (1.6)
13 (20.6)
4%
*Percentage is given inside the parenthesis. Frequency is given outside the parenthesis. N=63
By analyzing the dependent variables on impact of the training programme, table-10 shows the eleven
statements based on the impact of the skill development training programme of the respondents in the study
area.
It seems that 61.9% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable, clearly defined objectives
and 38.1% of them are agreed the same. 63.5% of the respondents are strongly agree the variable, encouraged
participation and interaction, 33.3% of them are agreed and 3.2% responding neutral to the variable. 55.6% of
the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable topics covered to present day context, 39.7% of the
respondents are agreed and only 4.8% of them responding neutral to the variable.
57.1% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable easy to follow and organized contents,
38.1% of them are agreed and 4.8% of them responding neutral to the variable.81% of the respondents strongly
agreeing the variable, utilization of distributed materials, whereas, 17.5% of them agree and only 1.6% of them
responding neutral to the variable. 76.2% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable effective
training experience in the field of computer science and 23.8% of the respondents are agreed the variable.
61.9% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable, familiar training topics assigned, 34.9%
of them are agreed and only 3.2% of them responding neutral to the variable. 61.9% of the respondents are
strongly agreeing the variable, well prepared trainees teach practical & theory, 33.3% of them are agreed and
only 4.8% of them responding neutral to the variable. 49.2% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the
variable, satisfied training objectives, similar percentage of them are agreed the same and only 1.6% of them
responding neutral to the variable. 36.5% of the respondents area strongly agreeing the variable, sufficient
allotment of training time, 42.9% are agreed the variable and only 20.6% of them responding neutral to the
same. 71.4% of the respondents are strongly agreeing the variable, comfortable and adequate facilities
provided and 28.6% of them are agreed the variable.
www.ijbmi.org
73 | Page
REFERENCES
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
Green Anne E., and Martinez-Solano Laura E., (2011),Leveraging Training: Skills Development In SMEs, Local Economic
and Employment Development (LEED), Working Paper Series, West Midlands, England, Pg. 21-28
Ministry of Human Resource Development, (2015), National policy for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, New Delhi,
Pg.1-3, URL: www.skilldevbelopment.com
Muriel Dunbar, (2011), Engaging the Private Sector in Skills Development, Department for International Development, Human
Development Resource Centre (HDRC), London, Pg. 4- 8
Noble Social and Educational Society, (2013), Impact Of Skill Development Programmes Of Jan Shikshan Sansthans On The
Neo-Literates In The States Of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka And Kerala, Research Study Report, Sponsored by
Planning Commission of Government of India, New Delhi, Pg. 129-133
OECD (2013), Skills Development and Training in SMEs, Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED), OECD
Publishing, Pg. 16- 21
Parthasarathy. K, Vivekanandan. K, Aswini. P.M, and Sasiraja S., (2016), A Case Study Approach for Evaluation of Skill
Development Training Workshops for School Teachers , Journal of Advances in Management IT & Social Science, Vol. 6, Issue
9, September 2016, ISSN-2231 4571, Pg. 21-41
Richard Garrett, Mike Campbell and Geoff Mason, (2010), The value of Skills- An Evidence Review, UK Commission for
Employment and Skills and the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, Report No.22, Pg.25- 38, URL :
http://dera.ioe.ac.uk
www.ijbmi.org
74 | Page