Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
73
PAPERS
Literature Review
Comparatives
One of the most powerful tools used
in intellectual enquiry is comparison, because any observation made
repeatedly gives more credence than
a single observation (Peterson, 2005).
Boddewyn (1965), describes comparative approaches as those concerned with
the systematic detection, identification,
classification, measurement, and interpretation of similarities and differences
among phenomena. The disciplines
such as social science, including project
management, usually rely on observation rather than experimentation unlike
the natural sciences in which randomized experiments are the ideal approach
for hypothesis testing. However, some
research problems cannot be readily
addressed using experiments, for example, when looking at research involving
two or more species in evolution, ecology, and behavior (Freckleton, 2009).
Comparative approaches have been
used for decades to address the limitations of experiments, in which virtually
every field in biological sciences uses
comparatives (Gittleman & Luh, 1992).
Comparative analyses unlike experimental studies have historically relied
74
April/May 2015
75
PAPERS
Natural Science
Social Science
Phenotype
Project
(Management)
Outcome
Cannot
touch it
Environment
Environmental factors
Progenotype
Genotype
Gene structure
The model also shows that the phenotype of an organism (the organism
itself ) is comparable with the project
outcome (product or service). The
details of this aspect of the comparison
are described in detail after the topic
of evolution of organisms and evolving
project methodologies (progenotype)
are covered.
The comparative model provides no
indication of how organisms or project outcomes (products or services)
evolved or adapted to the environment
over time, which is an underlying factor
in the development of the comparative.
The next section describes the evolutionary aspects of the underlying principles of the model.
Over billions of years, organisms
have evolved by constant gradual evolution from bacteria to what they are
today (Dawkins, 1988). Project deliverables such as cars, buses, cities and
all their infrastructure and subcomponents have also evolved but over
a much shorter evolutionary period.
Darwins theory of evolution (Darwin,
1859) states that organisms that have
successfully evolved are the best-suited
76
April/May 2015
variants optimized for their environments, and these organisms in turn create offspring, which then start a new
round of evolution. This reproductive
cycle can be viewed as an evolutionary
algorithm that creates and/or forms the
fitness landscape for the organisms that
are best adapted to the then given environment (Wright, 1932).
According to Darwin (1859), the
evolutionary process has three components:
Variation in any given species;
Selection of the fittest variants, that is,
those that are best suited to survive
and reproduce in their given environment; and
Heredity, whereas the features of the
best suited variants are retained and
passed on to the next generation
The social science concept of evolution is similar to natural science where
product or service evolution is within
a project environment. The meaning
of evolution within the social sciences,
specifically project management, is
the new release of a product/service
Characteristics of a Natural
Science Perspective
In this section, three specific characteristics were used to build the comparative model and should be kept in
mind when applying the suggested perspective to social science. These are
complexity, replicator, and Universal
Darwinism.
Complexity
Evolution has no boundaries, irrespective of whether it is in the fields of natural
or social science. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
believed the evolution of organisms was
a one-way road, which he called Complexity force or, in French, Le pouvoir
de la vie (Lamarck, 1838). In social
science, the management and development of products or services within
project and programs are also becoming
more complex (Vidal, Marle, & Bocquet,
2011). Complexity is a regular topic that
is discussed in senior management circles within and outside of the project
cover areas including physiology, sociology, and linguistics, whereas nongenebased extensions cover areas including
complex adaptive systems, memetics,
cultural selection, and robotics.
This paper is based on a gene-based
universal Darwinism extension to
derive the model and a gene and nongene-based universal Darwinism extension called (complex adaptive systems)
to build the theory behind the model.
With these characteristics in mind,
we can now develop the comparative
model.
The Comparative Model
The comparative model in Figure 2
shows the basis for a two-level comparative (Levels 1 and 2) between natural
science and social science.
The genotypes (genes) are the
starting points because, through their
expression, they will impact the organisms phenotype but not the other way
around, a one-way causation. The
first comparative is between the genotype and the methodology elements
(progenotype). The second comparative (Level 2) compares an organisms
(phenotype) with a project outcome
(phenotype).
Figure 3 provides a detailed twolevel mapping table between genotype
and progenotype and organism and
project outcome. The bottom half of
the table shows where the key attributes of an organisms genes have been
described and compared with the key
attributes of a projects progenotype.
Every organism has a unique
genome, which contains, through
encoded DNA, the entirety of an organisms hereditary information. The
genome describes what and how to
build a unique organism. Comparatively, a procedural-based methodology
that has been updated through lessons
learned derived from a product with lineage (versions), contains all the information on how and what product to
build. Genes have enduring attributes
that have ensured their survival over
millions of years. A progenotype also
77
PAPERS
Natural Science
Genomics
Social Science
Project Management
Environment
Level 2
Phenotype
Impact on Human
Mapping table
Impact on Organism
Nonhuman
Well
researched
Genotype
(Genes)
Impact on Project
(Management)
Outcome
Level 1
Progenotype
Mapping table
has enduring attributes that will determine if it will survive over the course
of time, or be replaced with something
more adaptable to the environment.
Referring to the Level 1 comparative in Figure 3, there is a striking
similarity between the attributes of a
gene and the attributes of an element
of a progenotype. For example, in gene
backup versus safeguarding of project
knowledge, both reduce the risks of
losing unique knowledge. New gene
creation from existing genes versus distribution of project knowledge ensures
that the genetic/project procedures are
at the right place and time. Creating
new genes from DNA versus project
innovation (i.e., the ability to create).
Finally, self-learning versus project lessons learned (i.e., the ability to adapt).
How are genes, versus the elements in a progenotype, controlled to
ensure that the described attributes
are realized? There are several types
of genesone of them is the master gene (Pearson, Lemons, & McGinnis, 2005). A master gene controls and
monitors the progress of the other genes
within its domain. The control of genes
is totally decentralized. Comparatively,
the elements of a (progenotype) are
controlled with something equivalent to
78
April/May 2015
Level 2
Product
Environmental Factors
Service
Application
Culture
Best price/
performance
Replicate
Collaborate
Project
Outcome
Signals
Process
Country/
Politics
People
Environmental
Factors
Heat,
Light,Water
Amino
Acids
Health of the
organism
Nonhuman
Organism
Survival
Genotype
(Genes)
Alleles
compete
to survive
Replicate
Signals
Mimicry
Apparent
Alturism
Competition
Sense of time
Body
and verbal
Reproduce
Adaptable
Need to
compete
Resilient
Human
Organism
Maintainable
Organization Technology
Heat,
Ability to eat Light,Water
Culture
Replicate
Collaborate
Progenotype
(Elements)
Signals
Backup
Safeguarding knowledge
Knowledge distribution
Genomeunique
per organism
Process
Country/
Politics
People
Organization Technology
Viruses
Inuences
Of Society
Innovation
Lessons learned
Explict knowledge exhibiting
HIGH impact on project outcome
Procedural Based
Methodology
Level 1
Figure 3: Mapping tableLevels 1 and 2.
Collaboration
The term collaborate is used in context of the gene and the project outcome, whereas apparent altruism is
used for organisms. Genes that dont
compete (nonalleles) collaborate to
produce phenotypic effects to support
their organisms survival (Nelson, 2006).
This could be in the form of signaling or other similar traits. The project outcome (product/service) is often
designed to collaborate with other products and/or services for example, other
component parts, Internet services,
servers and infrastructure, or software.
Whenever there is an interface from
one product or service to another, it is
a form of collaboration. Collaboration
is normally associated with organisms,
but there is no reason why products
and services cannot be considered to
collaborate by interfacing to support
79
PAPERS
using game theory, shows why two individuals might not cooperate, even when
it appears that it is in their best interests
to do so (Nowak & Sigmund, 1993).
Humans have more complex motives
than animals, but the underlying acts
of altruism always include aspects of
self-interest for both humans and animals (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Simon,
1993). Collaboration in humans with
apparent altruism is really just collaboration where both parties will benefit.
Signaling
Signaling is a phenotype trait that is created by gene expression that helps the
organism to survive (Wickler, 1968). Signaling is the conscience act of switching on and off something that warns or
attracts a recipient of the signal. Products and services have built-in signally
systems for both attracting and warning
the recipients of the signals.
Resilience
Resilience is a feature that genes have
built up by using various techniques
described in the Level 1 mapping. To
some degree, organisms and humans
are resilient to environmental conditions; accordingly a product or service
also needs to be resilient to environmental conditions.
Maintainability
When a gene or an organism cannot
maintain itself, it will die. Likewise,
when a product or service is not maintainable, it will fall into disrepair and
soon be replaced with something that is
more maintainable.
Adaptability
When a gene or organism, or likewise
a product or service, cannot adapt to
the environmental conditions, it will
most likely become extinct or obsolete. Some organisms have learned to
become adaptable, but only when the
change to the environment is not too
extreme and/or when the change does
not occur too quickly (Williams, Shoo,
Isaac, Hoffmann, & Langham, 2008).
80
April/May 2015
Theory Building
Many scholars define theory in terms
of relationships between independent
and dependent variables. Other scholars have defined theory in terms of
narratives and accounts (DiMaggio,
1995). According to Eisenhardt, theory
is evaluated primarily by the richness
of its account, the degree to which it
provides a close fit to empirical data,
and the degree to which it results in
novel insights (Eisenhardt, 1989b).
As the constructs of the comparative
model are new, no empirical data exist
to substantiate or disprove the model.
In absence of any previous comprehensive theory building, this section aims to
builds theory by using the established
constructs of complex adaptive systems
and, in doing so, will provide validity for
the constructs of the natural to social
science comparative.
Natural Science
Social Science
Complex Adaptive Systems
CAS across
organisms
Deduce this
relationship
Phenotype
Attributes
are
equivalent
across all
organisms
Outcome
Level 2
comparative
H Products and
Services create
their own CAS
Attributes are
e.g., powergrids,
comparable
Internet, online
across all human marketplaces
instigated CAS
Endeavor
G
E
CAS within an
organism
A
Attributes
are
comparable
Genotyping
(Gene)
Deduce this
relationship
Level 1
comparative
Progenotype
(Knowledge/
Method)
Attributes are
comparable
Where knowledge
is created e.g.,
Wikipedia,
research forums,
communities
Figure 4: Theory building using complex adaptive systems in both natural and social sciences.
The second link is between the phenotype labeled as (B) and the complex
adaptive systems across organisms
labeled as (F). A phenotype is the
expression of its genes (genotype) and
as such is a living organism (Jaenisch &
Bird, 2003). Organisms that live in large
groups such as ants and humans are
similar in themselves, exhibit emergent
behavior, and self-adapt to the environments they live in (Holland, 1992).
These attributes are consistent for any
organism that lives in large groups
(Dawkins, 1974). The conclusion can be
drawn that a phenotype (organism) that
is part of a large community is also part
of a complex adaptive system.
The third link is between the
progenotype, that is, project methodology and its elements labeled as
(C) and a wiki, which is a complex
adaptive system, and labeled as (G).
A methodology can contain thousands
of elements called units of knowledge
(Joslin & Mller, 2013). The elements
of any methodology are typically created by one or more individuals who
have combined and recombined processes that are based on knowledge
spanning over 100 years. For example,
A Guide to the Project Management Body
81
PAPERS
http://www.quora.com/
University and Cornell University are two universities with wiki-based project management methodologies.
Other project management wikis can be found by searching
on wiki + project management methodology.
3Harvard
82
April/May 2015
Application
of the Comparative
Based on the discussions thus far, a
natural science perspective suggests the
genotype as the independent variable
and phenotype as the dependent variable with the environment as the moderator variable.
To simplify the explanation, the
following environmental factors (i.e.,
moderator variables) are described in a
project and natural science (genotype)
perspective as follows:
Individual (personality and traits of a
project manager),
Organization (culture), and
External environment that the organization is in (stable or volatile).
The independent variable progenotype is subdivided into elements and
subelements, where each subelement
can be considered to be a unit of knowledge, which is a similar analogy to a
gene being a unit of heredity.
There is no formal definition of a
unit of knowledge within the field of
project management. Therefore, the following working definition is used for
this article: a unit of knowledge is the
smallest unit of information that is able
to take on the state of being true of false.
Using this definition, a methodology
subelement can now be defined as a
unit of knowledge constituting an affirmation being the smallest unit that can
be true or false.
A progenotype (i.e., parts of a methodology in its environment) is applied to
a project to achieve a desired outcome.
A progenotype describes what knowledge is required and how this knowledge
is to be applied to a project in order to
achieve a successful project outcome.
A project contains processes, tools
and techniques, deliverables, and stakeholders, which can be referred to as
project elements. The sum of the elements constitutes a project. A project
83
PAPERS
April/May 2015
Discussion
Comparatives have been made over
the past decades between natural
and social sciences providing new
ways to view and compare the items
being compared, but few comparatives have gone past the juxtaposition.
Developing a contemporary method
to observe a phenomenon can be ridiculed, but the findings in using the new
approach, soon offset the skepticism
(Kuhn,1970).
The two-level comparative that is
based on well-defined terminology, set
assumptions, and detailed mapping
tables goes further than many comparatives. This is because the apparently separate disciplines do have
many similar characteristics in terms
of complexity, design, impact of changing environments, and lineage. The
underlying concepts of the comparative
(Universal Darwinism, evolutionary
stable strategy, phenotyping/genotyping) allow for a rich comparative that
can be extended to encompass existing concepts within natural sciences
such as eusocial organisms (Kramer &
Schaible, 2013).
Complex adaptive systemsan
area of great interest in the academic
Phenomena
Comparative
Framework Level
(1or 2)
Description
Methodologies with a
bricolage of competing
elements
Level 1
Methodology elements are competing to be selected for a project in order to provide the
best fit for the context of the project and environment. Once selected, they collectively
work together to deliver a well-designed project outcome adapted to the environment.
Impotent (generic)
methodologies
Level 1
A methodology not designed for any project type or environment. When competing
against other methodologies that are adapted, it will have a lower chance of its own
survival and that of its project outcome.
Selfish projects
Level 2
Projects compete for resources such as management time, funding, and skills; therefore,
there is no interest to work with other projects unless a mutual interest exists.
Level 2
Lessons are intentionally not learned, because project managers cannot differentiate
themselves or prove their intellectual ability (fitness).
Level 2
Lessons learned are reified with the objective of being consumed by management so they
are learned. This takes the perspective of the lessons needed to achieve the objectives.
Level 2
Projects like organisms age and in doing so become less effective. Understanding the
attributes of aging and the implications of project efficiency and effectiveness, as well as
traits in the project outcome, will provide insight on how to set up and structure projects.
Conclusion
This study shows how the comparatives
within and across disciplines are able to
answer questions as well as provide new
insights that may not be possible with
existing research techniques. A great
deal can be learned by modeling and
mapping the natural science world to
85
PAPERS
Future Research
This study contributes to transformative research by suggesting a particular
empirical natural science perspective
for social science phenomena, such as
research in project methodologies, reifying projects, and project outcomes
as a comparative to existing perspectives. This study should help project
practitioners take a new perspective
on how they view projects in terms of
progenotype and how the elements of
the progenotype are assembled to create a project outcome most suited to its
environment. Any deviation from the
perspective or its implementation will
result in a suboptimal project and project outcome performance.
Future research recommendations
are:
To apply the comparative model in
existing research areas in order to
understand how it performs in terms of
supporting current findings, challenging current findings, and discovering
new findings.
To understand the limitations and
strengths of the comparative model.
To extend the comparative model
along the attribute dimensions to
allow a broader scope of applicability. For example, the attribute dimension collaborate can be extended to
include social organisms (Danforth,
2002; Simon, 1960), which will provide
insights to understanding why independent projects in a project portfolio
may be at greater risk of being canceled
or put on hold than linked or related
projects.
References
Adami, C., Ofria, C., & Collier, T. (2000).
Evolution of biological complexity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States, 2000(10).
Retrieved from http:// www.pnas.org/
content/97/9/4463.long
Alvesson, M., & Skldberg, K. (2009).
Reflexive methodology (2nd ed.). London,
England: Sage.
86
April/May 2015
OGC. (2002). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. (2nd ed.). London,
England: The Stationery Office.
87
PAPERS
88
April/May 2015
Definition
Source
Altruism
Oxford Dictionary
Cell
In biology, the smallest structural and functional unit of an organism, which is typically microscopic
and consists of cytoplasm and a nucleus enclosed in a membrane.
Oxford Dictionary
Chromosome
A threadlike structure of nucleic acids and protein found in the nucleus of most living cells, carrying
genetic information in the form of genes.
Oxford Dictionary
DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid, a self-replicating material which is present in nearly all living organisms as
the main constituent of chromosomes. It is the carrier of genetic information.
Oxford Dictionary
Evolutionary stable
strategy (ESS)
In game theory, behavioral ecology, and evolutionary psychology, an evolutionarily stable strategy
(ESS) is a strategy which explains why altruism is not sustainable.
Fidelity
Oxford Dictionary
Fitness landscape
In evolutionary biology, fitness landscapes or adaptive landscapes are used to visualize the relationship between genotypes (or phenotypes) and reproductive success.
Gene
Informal use: A unit of heredity which is transferred from a parent to offspring and is held to deter- Oxford Dictionary
mine some characteristic of the offspring.
Technical use: A distinct sequence of nucleotides forming part of a chromosome, the order of which
determines the order of monomers in a polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule which a cell (or virus)
may synthesize.
Genome
Genotype
Oxford Dictionary
Heredity
The passing on of physical or mental characteristics genetically from one generation to another.
The relative influence of heredity and environment.
Oxford Dictionary
Lineage
A sequence of species, each of which is considered to have evolved from its predecessor: e.g., the
chimpanzee and gorilla lineages.
A sequence of cells in the body which developed from a common ancestral cell, e.g., the myeloid
lineage.
Oxford Dictionary
Methodology
A system of practices, techniques, procedures, and rules used by those who work in a discipline.
Project Management
Institute
Dawkins, 1974
Authors
Mimicry
In evolutionary biology, the close external resemblance of an animal or plant (or part of one) to
another animal, plant, or inanimate object.
Oxford Dictionary
Nucleus
A dense organelle present in most eukaryotic cells, typically a single rounded structure bounded by
a double membrane, containing the genetic material.
Oxford Dictionary
Organism
Oxford Dictionary
Phenotype
Organisms phenotype is its observable characteristics or traits that are both physical and
behavioral.
Pleiotropic
Oxford Dictionary
Progenotype
A term used to denote the project core makeup (project methodology and the methodology elements).
Authors
Project
Project element
Authors
Project outcome
The results of the project in terms of deliverables and nondeliverables, irrespective of whether the
original project success criteria were achieved.
Authors
Traits
Oxford Dictionary
Unit of knowledge
The smallest unit of information that is able to take on the state of being true of false.
Authors
89