Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
and Regulation
Hiroyuki Hori, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
Chie Tomikawa, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
Akira Hirata, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
Yukimatsu Toh, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan
Kozo Tomita, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan
Takuya Ueda, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
Kimitsuna Watanabe, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
Advanced article
Article Contents
. Introduction
. Prokaryotic Systems
. Eukaryotic Systems
. Synthesis of Mature tRNA
. Summary
Based in part on the previous version of this eLS article Transfer RNA
Synthesis and Regulation (2009) by Yukimatsu Toh, Hiroyuki Hori,
Kozo Tomita, Takuya Ueda and Kimitsuna Watanabe.
Transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA), which is primarily transcribed from tRNA genes by RNA polymerase, matures via
several steps: processing, splicing, CCA addition and posttranscriptional modifications. Primary transcripts of
tRNA genes contain extra 5 and 3 sequences, which are
removed by a set of nucleases. In addition, some primary
transcripts contain introns, which are spliced out by specific endonucleases or in self-splicing reactions. The ligation of exons generally requires a tRNA ligase. In some
species, the CCA sequences present at the 3-termini of all
mature tRNAs are not encoded in the tRNA genes, but are
added post-transcriptionally by a CCA-adding enzyme. All
mature tRNA molecules contain modified nucleotides,
generated by specific tRNA modification enzymes or
guide RNA systems. These modified nucleotides are
involved in stabilisation of tRNA structure, decoding,
tRNA quality control, regulation of subcellular localisation of tRNAs and immune responses against infectious
organisms.
Introduction
To ensure ecient translation, the size and composition of
the intracellular transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) pool is
regulated at several stages of RNA synthesis and degradation. Codons residing in the open reading frames
eLS subject area: Biochemistry
How to cite:
Hori, Hiroyuki; Tomikawa, Chie; Hirata, Akira; Toh, Yukimatsu; Tomita,
Kozo; Ueda, Takuya; and Watanabe, Kimitsuna (September 2014)
Transfer RNA Synthesis and Regulation. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd:
Chichester.
DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000529.pub3
2
100
eLS & 2014, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net
70
Amount of tRNA
Amino acid
Codon
Anticodon
89
CAG
CUG
CUY
100
GAG
1 UUG
0 CUA
0 UUA
AUY
100
0 AUA
100
GUG
GUY
84
Leu
lle
Val
CCG
67
CCY
Pro
>1 CCA
100
52
ACY
ACG
>1 ACA
50
AAG
0 AAA
100
100
25
100
CAC
68
100
66
GGG
100
*UGG ND
Thr
GGU
CGU
*UGU ND
Ala
GGC
CGC
100
39
*UGC ND
CUU
*UUU ND
100
CGY/A
ICG
CGG Arg CCG 8
3 AGG
CCU ND
*UCC ND
0 AGA
100
Lys
100
GAU
CGG
Anticodon
5 GCA
*CAU ND
GAC
GCY
GCG
100
Amount of tRNA
Amino acid
Codon
*UAC ND
GUA
100
CAA ND
*UAG ND
*UAA ND
Codon usage
Codon usage
12
GGY
GGG
2 GGA
GCC
Gly
100
CCC
*UCC ND
100
85
Figure 1 Relative codon usages and tRNA levels in Micrococcus luteus. Codon usages and amounts of isoacceptor tRNAs are shown relative to the most abundant species (defined as 100). ND, not detected;
indicates a modified nucleotide; Y refers to U or C and I is inosine. Reprinted with permission from Kano A et al. (1991) & Elsevier.
Prokaryotic Systems
Gene-dosage effects
All tRNA genes in the Escherichia coli genome have been
identied and mapped (Komine et al., 1990; Blattner et al.,
1997). Escherichia coli has 86 tRNA genes corresponding
to 46 tRNA species, and the copy number for each tRNA
species ranges from one to four. tRNA genes corresponding to codons that frequently appear in ORFs of highly
expressed genes are always present in four copies, whereas
codons with moderate usage are translated by tRNAs
encoded by genes with two or three copies. By contrast,
tRNAs corresponding to rare codons are encoded by a
single gene. Gene dosage is thus clearly involved in the
regulation of tRNA concentrations. In addition to this
gene-dosage eect, it is likely that another mechanism,
promoter activity, simultaneously participates in the control of tRNA concentration.
Promoter activity
The amount of a given tRNA is not perfectly commensurate with its copy number. For example, in E. coli cells,
isoleucine tRNA corresponding to codons AUC and AUU
is present at a 20-fold higher concentration than the isoacceptor tRNA specic to the rare codon AUA, although
the respective copy numbers are three for the common
tRNA and one for the rare one. This discrepancy can be
explained by the involvement of promoter activity in regulation of tRNA contents. In E. coli, 40 tRNA genes are
found in operons and are thus primarily produced in
transcriptional units under the control of single promoters.
Ten tRNA genes are present in the spacer regions of
ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons, and six tRNA operons
contain protein genes, such as the EF-Tu gene. Because
EF-Tu and rRNA are highly expressed in cells, these
Degradation processes
Another mechanism for control of tRNA concentrations
was clearly demonstrated by extensive analysis of intracellular tRNA levels in Mycoplasma capricolum, which has
a highly AT-biased and compact genome (Muto et al.,
1990). In protein-encoding genes of M. capricolum, codons
terminating with U or A are frequently utilised. Almost all
tRNA genes in this bacteriums genome are encoded as
single-copy genes: 30 tRNA genes generate 29 tRNA species. However, the concentration of each tRNA species
diers greatly, ruling out the possibility that copy number
is solely responsible for regulating the tRNA concentration. Although the mechanism of tRNA gene expression
has not been systematically analysed, the following
observation suggests that tRNA degradation is also
involved in control of tRNA content: On the M. capricolum
genome, 22 of 30 tRNA genes are organised in polycistronic operons containing only tRNA genes, in contrast
to the case of E. coli. Although multiple tRNAs are transcribed in transcriptional units, the concentrations of
mature tRNA species dier from one to another. Hence,
the lifetime of a particular tRNA is related to the abundance of the tRNA molecule. Furthermore, the authors
recently found that in the thermophilic eubacterium
Thermus thermophilus, hypomodication at multiple sites
in tRNA due to disruption of one of the modication
enzymes promotes degradation of tRNAPhe and tRNALys
at high temperatures (Tomikawa et al., 2010). Thus, tRNA
modications are involved in regulation of tRNA halflives. Although several nucleases from various species have
been puried and characterised, the molecular mechanism
of tRNA degradation in prokaryotes remains unknown.
Eukaryotic Systems
Transcriptional control
The relative amounts of tRNA molecules in yeast have
been thoroughly analysed, and the tRNA concentrations
correlate well with the usage of cognate codons. Owing to
recent large-scale genome analyses, information about
eukaryotic tRNA genes has increased rapidly over the past
15 years (Lowe and Eddy, 1997; Juhling et al., 2009; Abe
et al., 2009). The molecular mechanisms responsible for the
regulation of tRNA concentrations remain to be elucidated, but transcription has been implicated in these
processes.
The transcription of eukaryotic tRNA genes is more
complex than that of bacterial tRNA. The transcriptional
machinery containing RNA polymerase III, which is
responsible for transcribing eukaryotic tRNA genes,
requires short conserved sequences, called the A and B
boxes, downstream of the transcriptional start site (Geiduschek and Tocchini-Valentine, 1988). These boxes correspond to the coding regions for the D- and T-arms in
tRNA, respectively. These two short stretches are essential
for the binding of a transcription complex comprising two
transcriptional factors, TFIIIB and TFIIIC, as well as for
initiation of transcription. In addition to the A and B
boxes, other regions contribute to the eciency of transcription. In the 5 upstream anking regions, elements
inuencing transcriptional eciency have been identied
in both insects and vertebrates. These elements, which act
either positively or negatively, are likely to be related to the
control of tRNA expression. Additionally, 3 anking
elements also inuence transcriptional activity. These 5
and 3 anking elements are important for binding of
specic transcription factors that control particular
tRNAs. However, the manner in which such anking
sequences are involved in the regulation of tRNA concentrations remains unknown.
In addition, the Maf1 protein inhibits the transcription
of tRNA by acting as a repressor of RNA polymerase III
(Pol III) (Ciesla and Boguta, 2008). This protein was
initially identied in yeast, and later shown to be evolutionarily conserved: Maf1 orthologues also restrain transcription in mouse and human cells. Transcription
4
Modied nucleosides
Function
References
Wobble position
Q (queuosine)
I (inosine)
f5C (5-formylcytidine)
L (k2C, lysidine) and agm2C(agmatidine)
2-O-methylated pyrimidine
Anticodon arm
M1G37
Stabilisation of codonanticodon
interaction or U-turn structure in the
anticodon loop by reinforcing stacking,
maintenance of reading frame
Stabilisation of the anticodon structure
m5C34, m5C40
Table 1
Continued
Three-dimensional
core
Modied nucleosides
Function
References
s U8, 9
Function unknown
D16, 17, 20
Function unknown
Archaeosine15
Gm18
m7G46
m5C48, m5C49
T54
s2T54
C55
m1A58
Location
RNA ligase
References
Eukaryotes
Yeast, fungi, plant
Heterotetramer
Multifunctional-type
Animalb
Heterotetramer
RtcB (Human
HSPC117)
Archaeac
RtcB
Domain of life
a
Eubacteriad
a
Introns are found only between positions 38 and 39 (canonical position) in precursor tRNA. The secondary structure of cleavage sites forms the
buldgehelixbuldge (standard) motif.
Branchiostoma oridae (amphioxus), an exception among animals, has a multifuncitonal tRNA ligase.
c
Introns are often inserted into non-canonical positions such as D-arm, T-arm and aminoacyl stem in addition to the canonical position. The
secondary structures of cleavage sites in archaeal precursor tRNAs show several variations. Archaeal tRNA splicing endonucleases are classied
into four types (a2, a4, a2b2 and e2) based on the structures. The a2b2 and e2 types have a broad substrate specicity, in which nonstandard introns at
non-canonical positions are cleaved.
d
Some precursor tRNAs from proteobacteria have an intron. The intron is removed and the exons are joined by the group I intron self-splicing
mechanism. Consequently, specic endonucleases and RNA ligases are not required. RtcB homologues are widely found in eubacteria.
b
tRNA splicing
Introns are often found in the tRNA genes of eubacteria,
archaea, eukaryotes and organelles. Most introns are
found between positions 38 and 39 in the anticodon loop
region. Table 2 summarises the enzymes concerned with
tRNA splicing; to minimise the citations in the text, the
table also provides detailed references. The mechanism of
tRNA splicing in yeast has been extensively studied by
identication of splicing mutants and purication of the
enzymes responsible for each step. In yeast, tRNA splicing
occurrs in the cytoplasm (Takano et al., 2005), and precursor tRNA is matured over the course of repeated
transports between the nucleus and cytoplasm (Ohira and
Suzuki, 2011). Yeast tRNA splicing endonuclease (a
complex consisting of Sen2, Sen15, Sen34, and Sen54)
cleaves intron-containing tRNA precursor at the canonical
splice site. The remaining 2,3-cyclic phosphate at the 3
end of the 5 fragment is converted to 2 phosphate by cyclic
phosphodiesterase. Subsequently, polynucleotide kinase
phosphorylates the 5 hydroxyl of the 3 fragment, and
adenylated tRNA ligase transfers its adenosine
8
tRNA modification
Modied nucleotides have been found in many types of
RNA molecules, but tRNA molecules contain the greatest
diversity of such modications. At specic positions in
tRNAs, the normal nucleotides, A, G, U, and C, are
enzymatically converted to modied forms before, during,
or after the processing, splicing, and transport steps. To
date, more than 100 nucleotide derivatives have been
identied in tRNAs (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Although several
modications play important roles in the translation process (Table 2), the functions of many modications remain
to be discovered. To minimise the citation in the texts,
detailed references are provided in Table 1.
NH
HN
CH3
HN
O
HO
HO
HO
HO
OH
HO
5
Pseudouridine ()
OH
HO
NH
HN
5-Methyluridine (m U)
or
ribothymidine (T)
OH
Dihydrouridine (D)
HO
HO
NH
O
N
HN
HO
H2N
HO
HO
HO
OH
HO
OH
HO
Inosine (I)
CH2NHCH2COOH
HN
HN
CH2
OH
Carboxymethylaminomethyl-2thiouridine (cmnm5s2 U)
Queuosine (Q)
CH3OOCCHNHCOOCH3
CH2
CH2
OCH2CO2H
HN
HNCH2CH
CH3
N
CH 3
CH 3
N
CH3
HO
HO
HO
OH
HO
HNCH2CH
N
CH3S
CH3
HO
2-Methylthio-N 6 2
isopentenyladenosine (ms i 6 A)
Figure 2
N 6 -Isopentenyladenosine (i6A)
CH3
CH3
CHOH
CHOH
HNCONHCHCO2H
HO
OH
OH
HNCONHCHCO2H
CH3
HO
OH
Wybutosine (yW)
HO
HO
CH3S
OH
N 6-Threonylcarbamoyladenosine
(t6A)
HO
HO
HO
OH
2-Methylthio-N 6threonylcarbamoyladenosine
(ms 2 t6 A)
74
73
72
71
1
2
70
69
68
A2-O-ribosyl phosphate
67
66
m1A
60 59
65 64 63 62 61
58
3
4
5
m2G,m22G
6
7
s4U
8
D
16
17
18
19
Gm
15 14 13 12 11 10
20 21
m2G ,m2
2G
57
56
m5C
22 23 24 25 26
27
m2G ,m22G
75 76
49 50 51 52 53
54 55
48 47
28
29
43 44 45
42
41
30
31
40
39
32
33
34
38
37
35 36
46
T, s2T
m7G
m5C
11
s2T54 modication is involved in the synthesis of molybdenum cofactor and thiamine (Shigi et al., 2008). C55 is
universally conserved among the three domains of life. C is
synthesised by TruB or Pus4p protein. m1A58, generated
by TrmI, is essential in thermophilic bacteria for growth at
high temperatures. Archaeal TrmI modies both A57 and
A58 to m1A57 and m1A58, respectively. The 2-O-ribosyl
phosphate A64 modication functions in distinguishing
initiator from elongator tRNAMet. See also: Transfer
RNA Modication
Summary
Synthesis of tRNA molecules requires a combination of
processes. tRNA synthesis shares processing and splicing
mechanisms with maturation of rRNA and mRNA molecules, whereas CCA addition and modication are, in
general, peculiar to tRNA molecules. The combination of
these mechanisms diers from species to species. This
complexity indicates that tRNA gene expression has
adopted new fundamental processes throughout evolution. Relative amounts of tRNAs are regulated by several
factors: copy number of tRNA genes; transcriptional
activity, derived from promoter activity mediated by
transcriptional factors and specic factors (ppGpp and
pppGpp in prokaryotes and Maf1 in eukaryotes) and
regulated by the nutrient conditions; and tRNA degradation by various nucleases. The evolutionary signicance of
the diversity of tRNA synthesis processes has not been well
characterised and needs to be claried. A remarkable
characteristic of tRNA, distinguishing it from both mRNA
and rRNA, is the presence of a wide variety of modied
nucleotides, which are introduced by modication
enzymes during or after the processing, splicing, and
transport. Although several modications are known to
play important roles in translation, the functions of many
modications remain to be discovered. In addition, many
of the modication processes have yet to be analysed.
References
Abe T, Ikemura T, Ohara Y et al. (2009) tRNADB-CE: tRNA
gene database curated manually by experts. Nucleic Acids
Research 37: D163D168.
Alexandrov A, Chernyakov I, Gu W et al. (2006) Rapid tRNA
decay can result from lack of nonessential modications.
Molecular Cell 21: 8796.
Alexandrov A, Martzen MR and Phizicky EM (2002) Two proteins that form a complex are required for 7-methylguanosine
modication of yeast tRNA. RNA 8: 12531266.
Anderson J, Phan L, Cuesta R et al. (1998) The essential Gcd10pGcd14p nuclear complex is required for 1-methyladenosine
modication and maturation of initiator methionyl-tRNA.
Genes Development 12: 36503652.
Anderson J, Phan L and Hinnebusch AG (2000) The Gcd10p/
Gcd14p complex is the essential two-subunit tRNA(1-methyladenosine) methyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
12
Englert M and Beier H (2005) Plant tRNA ligases are multifunctional enzymes that have diverged in sequence and substrate specicity from RNA ligases of other phylogenetic
origins. Nucleic Acids Research 33: 388399.
Englert M, Sheppard K, Aslanian A, Yates JR 3rd and Soll D
(2011) Archaeal 3-phosphate RNA splicing ligase characterization identies the missing component in tRNA maturation.
Proceedings of the Sciences of the USA 108: 12901295.
Englert M, Sheppard K, Gundllapalli S, Beier H and Soll D
(2010) Branchiostoma oridae has separate healing and sealing
enzymes for 5-phosphate RNA ligation. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 1683416839.
Farabaugh PJ and Bjork GR (1999) How translational accuracy
inuences reading frame maintenance. EMBO Journal 18:
14271434.
Filipowicz W and Shatkin AJ (1983) Origin of splice junction
phosphate in tRNAs processed by HeLa cell extract. Cell 32:
547557.
Fislage M, Roovers M, Tuszynska I et al. (2012) Crystal structures of the tRNA:m2G6 methyltransferase Trm14/TrmN from
two domains of life. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 51495161.
Fujishima K, Sugahara J, Miller CS et al. (2011) A novel threeunit tRNA splicing endonuclease found in ultrasmall Archaea
possesses broad substrate specicity. Nucleic Acids Research 39:
96959704.
Gehrig S, Eberle ME, Botschen F et al. (2012) Identication of
modications in microbial, native tRNA that suppress immunostimulatory activity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 209:
225233.
Geiduschek EP and Tocchini-Valentine GP (1988) Transcription
by RNA polymerase III. Annual Review of Biochemistry 57:
873914.
Goto-Ito S, Ito T, Kuratani M, Bessho Y and Yokoyama S (2009)
Tertiary structure checkpoint at anticodon loop modication in
tRNA functional maturation. Nature Structural & Molecular
Biology 16: 11091115.
Gu X, Ivanetic KM and Santi DV (1996) Recognition of the Tarm of tRNA by tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase is not
sequence specic. Biochemistry 35: 1165211659.
Guelorget A, Roovers M, Guerineau V et al. (2010) Insights into
the hyperthermostability and unusual region-specicity of
archaeal Pyrococcus abyssi tRNA m1A57/58 methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Research 38: 62066218.
Gurha P and Gupta R (2008) Archaeal Pus10 proteins can produce both pseudouridine 54 and 55 in tRNA. RNA 14: 2521
2527.
Guy MP, Podyma BM and Preston MA (2012) Yeast Trm7
interacts with distinct proteins for critical modications of the
tRNAPhe anticodon loop. RNA 18: 19211933.
Hamdane D, Argentini M, Cornu D, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B and
Fontecave M (2012) FAD/folate-dependent tRNA methyltransferase: avin as a new methyl-transfer agent. Journal of the
American Chemical Society 134: 1973919745.
Hirata A, Fujishima K, Yamagami R et al. (2012) X-ray structure
of the fourth type of archaeal tRNA splicing endonuclease:
insights into the evolution of a novel three-unit composition
and a unique loop involved in broad substrate specicity.
Nucleic Acids Research 40: 1055410566.
Hirata A, Kitajima T and Hori H (2011) Cleavage of intron
from the standard or non-standard position of the precursor
13
14
15
16
Further Reading
Soll D and RajBhandary U (eds) (1995) tRNA: Structure, Biosynthesis and Function. Washington, DC: American Society for
Microbiology.
17