Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
Composites Science and Technology 64 (2004) 13011310
www.elsevier.com/locate/compscitech
a,b,c
b,*
,
Key Laboratory for Polymeric Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China
b
Materials Science Institute, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China
c
Institute of Polymers, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, PR China
Received 24 March 2003; received in revised form 10 September 2003; accepted 20 October 2003
Available online 16 December 2003
Abstract
Self-reinforced sisal composites were prepared by molding slightly benzylated sisal bers. The environmental degradation behavior of the materials was evaluated in the present paper with reference to the eects of ageing in water, enzyme solution and soil,
respectively. It was found that the inherent biodegradability of plant bers is still associated with the composites. In contrast to plant
ber/synthetic polymer composites, however, water resistance of the current composites is greatly increased as characterized by the
insignicant variation in the mechanical properties of the composites before and after being aged in water. With the help of cellulase
and fungi, the self-reinforced sisal composites can be degraded leading to weight loss and decay of mechanical performance. In the
course of cellulase induced degradation, the insusceptibility of lignin to the enzyme decelerated the rate of deterioration, while the
soil burial resulted in an overall decomposition of the composites.
2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A. Fibers; A. Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Degradation; B. Mechanical properties; B. Surface treatments
1. Introduction
For keeping in step with societal concerns on energy
crisis and ecological problems, reduction in the usage of
materials made from fossil oil becomes more and more
important. In the eld of composite materials, for example, a series of works have been done to replace the
conventional synthetic ber composites by means of
natural vegetable ber composites [1,2]. So far, two
main technical routes have been developed. One deals
with the compounding of natural ber with traditional
petroleum based polymers, like thermosetting polymers
(unsaturated polyester [3], epoxy [4], phenol formaldehyde resin [5], etc.), or low processing temperature
thermoplastic polymers (polypropylene [6], polyethylene
[7], etc.). The other mixes plant bers with biodegrad-
1302
PLANT FIBERS
PLASTICIZATION
THERMOFORMABLE
MATERIAL
(as matrix)
SURFACE MODIFCATION
SHORT OR CONTINUOUS
FIBERS WITH
PLASTICIZED SKIN
LAYERS
SHORT OR CONTINUOUS
FIBERS WITH CHANGED
SURFACE CHEMISTRY
(as reinforcement)
COMPOUNDING AS CONVENTIONAL
THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES TO PRODUCE
PLANT FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICIZED PLANT
FIBER COMPOSITES
THERMOFORMED AS
CONVENTIONAL
THERMOPLASTICS TO
PRODUCE SELF-REINFORCED
COMPOSITES
3.0
Relative variation in
sample weight [%]
2. Experimental
1303
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1/2
Time
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1/2
[h ]
1304
Table 1
Variation in composites sizes due to water aging at room temperature
Composites
Relative
increase in
thickness
(%)
Relative
increase
in width
(%)
96
3.3
1.1
168
96
4.7
2.4
1.5
0.9
168
96
3.5
1.9
1.1
0.8
168
2.5
0.9
2.0
3.5
1
Relative variation in
sample weight [%]
Aging
time (h)
1.5
2
3
1.0
0.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
3
0.0
9
1/2
Time
12
15
1/2
[h ]
Fig. 3. Moisture absorption behavior of self-reinforced sisal composites at room temperature. Weight gains of the benzylated sisal: (1) 25.8
wt%; (2) 43.0 wt%; (3) 59.8 wt%.
1.5
30
60
90
120
150
180
Time [h]
Fig. 4. Flexural modulus of self-reinforced sisal composites versus
aging time in water at room temperature. Weight gains of the benzylated sisal: (1) 25.8 wt%; (2) 43.0 wt%; (3) 59.8 wt%.
100
80
60
40
30
60
90
120
150
180
Time [h]
Fig. 5. Flexural strength of self-reinforced sisal composites versus aging time in water at room temperature. Weight gains of the benzylated
sisal: (1) 25.8 wt%; (2) 43.0 wt%; (3) 59.8 wt%.
40
35
30
2
25
1305
20
3
15
30
60
90
120
150
180
Time [h]
Fig. 6. Impact strength of self-reinforced sisal composites versus aging
time in water at room temperature. Weight gains of the benzylated
sisal: (1) 25.8 wt%; (2) 43.0 wt%; (3) 59.8 wt%.
50
4
1306
40
3
30
20
1
10
50
100
Fig. 8. Time dependence of weight loss of: (1) sisal bers; (24) benzylated sisal bers due to enzymolysis (cellulase-to-specimen weight
ratio 1%). Weight gains of the benzylated sisal: (2) 15.5 wt%; (3) 26.5
wt%; (4) 43.2 wt%.
inforced composites from sisal do not vary greatly except the quantity of weight loss (Fig. 9). That is, the
composites are less susceptible to enzyme-aided biodegradation than the bers. The signicantly increased
packing density of the molded composite sheet, characterized by the remarkably reduced water absorbability
(cf. Figs. 2 and 3), should be responsible for the phenomenon. The buer solution of cellulase can only immigrate into the sheets through the surface defects, and
hence the reaction probability is decreased.
To have a direct image of the eect of enzyme-aided
biodegradation, morphologies of sisal bers and the selfreinforced composites before and after enzymolysis are
given in Fig. 10. For both untreated and benzylated sisal, the attack of cellulase leaves splits and cavities on
the cell walls (cf. Fig. 10(a)(d)). However, the skeletons
of the cells still exist because of the hindrance of lignin,
which coincides with the results and analyses of Fig. 8.
In the case of molded composite sheets, there are a
8
2
30
200
Time [h]
40
20
1
10
150
2
1
50
100
150
200
Time [h]
Fig. 9. Time dependence of weight loss of self-reinforced sisal composites due to enzymolysis (cellulase-to-specimen weight ratio 1%).
Weight gains of the benzylated sisal: (1) 15.5 wt%; (2) 26.5 wt%; (3)
43.2 wt%.
1307
5
Before enzymolysis
After enzymolysis
0
15.5
26.5
43.2
100
80
Before enzymolysis
After enzymolysis
60
40
20
0
15.5
26.5
43.2
Fig. 12. Enzymolysis induced deterioration of exural strength of selfreinforced sisal composites. Enzymolysis conditions: cellulase-tospecimen weight ratio 1%; reaction time 192 h.
number of cracks on the surface of the composites experienced enzymolysis (cf. Fig. 10(e) and (f)). It implies
that the biodegradation is initiated at the sample surface
and then occurs inside the material with the diusion of
cellulase.
Considering that chain scission of cellulose due to enzymolysis weakens the lignocellulosic cell walls, the mechanical performance of the self-reinforced sisal
composites would certainly go to decay. Unexpectedly,
the reduction in exural stiness and strength as well as
impact toughness of the composites after enzymolysis is
not signicant (Figs. 1113). In addition, the decrement of
the mechanical properties induced by enzymolysis seems
not to vary with the extent of benzylation of the bers. It
not only manifests that the composites have high damage
50
40
Before enzymolysis
After enzymolysis
30
20
10
0
15.5
26 .5
43.2
1308
Fig. 15. SEM micrographs of the surface of self-reinforced sisal composite sheets having been biodeteriorated for 6 months in soil (from
September to March).
2
1
0
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Time
Fig. 14. Time dependence of weight loss of self-reinforced sisal composites due to soil burial. Weight gains of the benzylated sisal: (1) 15.5
wt%; (2) 26.5 wt%; (3) 43.2 wt%.
15.5
26.5
43.2
100
80
60
40
20
0
15.5
26.5
43.2
50
40
30
1309
20
Acknowledgements
10
0
15.5
26.5
43.2
4. Conclusions
1. Similar to the case of untreated sisal bers, water uptake of the self-reinforced composites made from
slightly benzylated sisal follows Fickian law. Having
been aged in water, the mechanical properties, like
exural modulus, exural strength, and impact
strength, of the composites do not change greatly because of the reduced hydroscopicity of the composites
The nancial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 50173032), the Team
Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant: 20003038), and the Talents
Training Program Foundation of the Higher Education
Department of Guangdong Province are gratefully
acknowledged.
References
[1] Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based
bre. Prog Polym Sci 1999;24:22174.
[2] Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Sustainable bio-composites
from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the
green materials world. J Polym Environ 2002;10:1926.
[3] Semsarzadeh MA. Fiber matrix interaction in jute reinforced
polyester resin. Polym Compos 1986;7:235.
[4] Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GC, Zeng HM. The eect of
ber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional
sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol
2001;61:143747.
[5] Sreekala MS, Kumaran MG, Joseph S, Jacob M, Thomas S. Oil
palm bre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites: inuence
of bre surface modications on the mechanical performance.
Appl Compos Mater 2000;7:295329.
[6] Collier JR, Lu M, Fahrurrozi M, Collier BJ. Cellulosic reinforcement in reactive composite systems. J Appl Polym Sci
1996;61:142330.
1310