Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Adrienne Massanari
University of Illinois at Chicago
amass@uic.edu
Abstract
This article considers how the social-news and community site
Reddit.com has become a hub for anti-feminist activism. Examining
two recent cases of what are defined as toxic technocultures
(#Gamergate and The Fappening), this work describes how Reddits
design, algorithm, and platform politics implicitly support these kinds
of cultures. In particular, this piece focuses on the ways in which
Reddits karma point system, aggregation of material across
subreddits, ease of subreddit and user account creation, governance
structure, and policies around offensive content serve to provide
fertile ground for anti-feminist and misogynistic activism. The ways in
which these events and communities reflect certain problematic
aspects of geek masculinity is also considered. This research is
informed by the results of a long-term participant-observation and
ethnographic study into Reddits culture and community and is
grounded in actor-network theory.
Keywords
Reddit, gender, toxic technocultures, platform politics, online
harassment, The Fappening, Gamergate, algorithms, online
communities, design
Bio
Adrienne Massanari is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Introduction
In 2014, a spate of anti-feminist action and harassment highlighted
the ongoing problems that women face engaging in online spaces.
One event, The Fappening, centered on illegally acquired nudes of
celebrities (most prominently Jennifer Lawrence) distributed and
discussed via anonymous image-board 4chan and Reddit.com. The
second, #Gamergate, ostensibly a hashtag movement spawned by
individuals who purported to be frustrated by a perceived lack of
ethics within gaming journalism, became a campaign of systematic
harassment of female and minority game developers, journalists, and
critics and their allies. Both were emblematic of an ongoing backlash
against women, and their use of technology and participation in public
life. Discussions of harassment online often cast a broad net, focusing
on the legal aspects or offering large-scale policy solutions that might
reduce victimization (Citron, 2014). Fewer however examine the ways
certain design decisions and assumptions of use unintentionally may
enable and/or implicitly encourage these spaces to become hotbeds of
misogynistic activism.
In this article, I examine how the platform and algorithmic
politics (Bucher, 2012; Gillespie, 2010; van Dijck, 2013) of Reddit.com
provides fertile ground for these kinds of toxic spaces to emerge. By
focusing on the ways in which a single platforms design and politics
can support these kinds of activities, I hope to highlight the ways in
into karma points for a users account, a kind of currency that marks
an individuals contributions to the Reddit community.
While featuring very basic profile pages, Reddit has less in
common with social-networking spaces like Facebook or Google+ than
it does message boards and early community sites like the WELL.
Because accounts are pseudonymous and easily created, interactions
on the platforms myriad subreddits tend to feature elements of play
and candor that one might not associate with traditional socialnetworking spaces that enforce a one-name/real name policy
(Massanari, 2015). Presumably to encourage this sense of play and
candor, Reddits administrators take an extremely hands-off approach
towards content shared by users. The few rules they enforce prohibit
sharing private information (doxxing), or sexualized images of minors,
distributing spam, interfering with the sites regular functioning, and
manipulating voting (reddit.com, 2014).
Reddit has quickly become a popular center of geek culture.
Because anyone can create a subreddit on any topic, niche interests
are well represented on the site. So finding others interested in an
obscure anime show is easy, as there is probably a subreddit that
already exists for discussing it, or one can easily be created. In
addition, Reddits default subreddits (which tend to have the largest
subscriber base) skew towards geek interests, with gaming
(/r/gaming), science and technology (/r/science and /r/technology),
10
11
12
#Gamergate
In August 2014, a blog written by the jilted ex-lover of a female
independent game designer was posted to the SomethingAwful forums
in a thread about terrible breakups. It was quickly removed by
moderators, but soon found its way to anonymous image board 4chan.
Authored by Eron Gjoni, the blog featured excruciating detail about
13
14
15
The Fappening
Around the time that #Gamergate was gaining steam in late August
2014, a large cache of stolen photos of celebrities was posted to
4chan. Many of the images were private female celebrity selfies that
had been stored using Apples iCloud service. While a number of
women were victimized by the hack, many of the images featured
Jennifer Lawrence, star of The Hunger Games series of films. After the
16
17
18
19
from the ways those norms are shaped by the platform and
administrative policies becomes difficult in a space like Reddit, as
they are co-constitutive of one another. In this section, I broaden out
from considering just the cases of The Fappening and #Gamergate to
argue that the culture and design politics of Reddit implicitly allows
anti-feminist and racist activist communities to take hold.
ANTs strength as a theoretical framework is that it sensitizes
us to the often-unintended consequences of non-human actants (bots,
scripts, algorithms, policies) and the ways in which they shape online
cultures. In this vein, a critical factor that shapes the prominence of
anti-feminist activity on the platform is karma. As I mentioned earlier,
karma is a point system that purports to represent how much
Redditors value a particular accounts contribution. Postings and
comments are accompanied by a point total (score), which is some
variation on upvotes minus downvotes that is fuzzed so that spammers
and others are less likely to game the system (jeffzem, 2014). Scores
also affect the visibility of a given comment or posting; when
comments are sorted by the default best, those comments that are
highly upvoted and have received a large number of comment replies
are listed higher than others.7 Each user account has an associated
amount of karma based on the scores of their comments and postings
to Reddit as a whole. This system valorizes individual contributions
and suggests that the site is democratic in terms of what material
20
21
22
23
a terrible space for the women who had once found it supportive
(sodypop, 2014). Visibility in the form of defaulting did create a toxic
environment in TwoX (at least initially), with individuals being
harassed and trolled, and comment threads subjected to mass
downvoting by other Redditors who were angered by the change, even
though all they needed to do was unsubscribe to the subreddit if they
did not want to see it on their front page.
The issue of visibility becomes salient, not just in terms of the
ways in which it reflects Reddits sorting algorithm, but also when
subreddits, particularly those that do not reflect a particular kind of
(white) geek masculinity, are elevated to prominence via /r/all. A vocal
minority of Redditors can hijack their content, and their subscribers
may become the target of specific harassment efforts. In contrast,
material that does align with the kind of (white) geek masculinity that
many within the Reddit community prize faces little resistance. For
example, during The Fappening, the stolen images quickly propagated
across subreddits, earned upvotes, and thus appeared with frequency
on /r/all. Likewise, when #Gamergate was still an allowable topic on
Reddits many gaming subreddits (/r/gaming, /r/Games, and
/PCMasterRace, etc.), the same story or video appeared in many
different guises on /r/all. They were then upvoted even more as they
became more popular and were submitted to other subreddits. And
because upvotes represent visibility on Reddit, and earlier votes count
24
more heavily than later ones, downvoting after something has become
extremely popular is likely to have little effect.
Reddits platform design also provides little support for
discouraging material that might be objectionable or harassing. The
only recourse administrators provide to users is the ability for
individual accounts to report links and comments to moderators. In
the report form, a logged-in Redditor can indicate that the content is
breaking one of the five rules of Reddit, or can provide another short,
100-character explanation. As with other sites that rely on flagging
as a mechanic for handling offensive content, Reddits tools are
limited and do little to support a public, deliberative discussion as to
why something might be objectionable (Crawford and Gillespie, 2014).
And, there is no clear way to report an entire subreddit for
objectionable content, other than messaging the administrators
directly. Additionally, site administrators actively discourage Redditors
from engaging in witch-hunts by overusing the report tool or
downvoting indiscriminately, instead encouraging them to create their
own communities (subreddits) where they can implement their own
rules around interactions (Auerbach, 2014). However, Reddit already
functions as a de facto vote-brigading platform, as it encourages large
numbers of people to visit (and comment on) material other sites host.
The real issue, as some Redditors argue, is the lack of transparency
25
26
27
28
do the time-consuming job, or can do it well. This means that minifiefdoms often spring up, whereby a very few moderators control a
large segment of the subreddits resulting in a something more akin
to an autocratic, rather than democratic, system of governance
(Auerbach, 2014). It is incredibly difficult, too, for powerful
moderators to be removed from their positions, however inefficient or
problematic they become (see, for example, Alfonso, 2014b). Often
moderators of the more pernicious subreddits coalesce; for example,
one of the moderators for the popular subreddit /r/BlackPeopleTwitter
also moderates /r/CuteFemaleCorpses, /r/BeatingWomen2, and
/r/HurtingAnimals.
There seems to be a deep reluctance on the part of the
administrators to alienate any part of their audience, no matter how
problematic, as it will mean less traffic and ultimately less revenue for
Reddit. In the case of The Fappening, the fluid and decentralized
nature of Reddit meant that these images were not just contained to
the /r/thefappening subreddit. Less prominent subreddits became
distribution points for the images, even after they were clearly
identified as illegally obtained. For example, a moderator of /r/Celebs
expressed ambivalence about allowing the images to be submitted,
but also seemed to express glee at what was termed insane traffic
the subreddit was receiving because of the hack (atticus138, 2014).
Later, these moderators chose to ban the images, but only after site
29
30
Conclusion
Both #Gamergate and The Fappening created an odd paradox, by
which individuals associated with each event viewed their actions as
somehow noble (at least in the case of the former) or at least
unproblematic, while engaging in what even superficially could be
considered unethical activity. Both communities raised money for
charities that were refused by recipient foundations. While entirely
understandable and unsurprising for anyone outside these toxic
technocultures, these refusals were portrayed as being somehow
surprising, shocking, or hypocritical by those within. Implied in both
cases is the idea that women should be shamed and deserve lower
standard of privacy because of their sexual activities. Both events are
also indicative of a pattern of toxic technocultures that have gained an
outsized presence on the Reddit platform.
31
32
Afterward
During the course of researching and writing this piece, a number of
significant changes to Reddits content policy and administrative team
33
occurred. The first change, announced in February 2015, banned socalled revenge porn from the site. In June, new policies to
discourage the harassment of Reddit members eventually led to the
banning of /r/fatpeoplehate (FPH) and several other subreddits
(kn0thing, 2015). Both policy changes were instituted by interim CEO
Ellen Pao, and the latter in particular led to a kind of uprising by
certain individuals who viewed it as the first of many steps towards
the sites capitulation to political correctness and social justice
warriors (SJWs). In addition to spamming the site with FPH clones,
some Redditors posted anti-Pao propaganda which dominated the
sites front page for several days. Still other Redditors wondered why
other subreddits, such as the racist /r/coontown, were spared
elimination. Tellingly, subreddits such as /r/KotakuInAction were on
the anti-Pao frontlines, becoming vocal supporters of a Change.org
petition to remove her as CEO (lleti, 2015).
The final straw came in July 2015, when popular Reddit
community administrator and AMA coordinator Victoria Taylor was
fired without administrators notifying the moderators of /r/IAMA and
other subreddits who depended on her assistance. This was viewed by
many as further evidence of the dysfunctional relationship between
Reddit administrators and moderators (Lynch and Swearingen, 2015).
Blame for the botched departure of Taylor was placed on Paos
shoulders. The next week, Pao resigned and co-founder Steve
34
Huffman reemerged to become the sites new CEO. Ellen Pao (2015)
subsequently penned an opinion piece for The Washington Post
suggesting that the trolls are winning on Reddit and across the
internet given the numerous death threats and invective she received.
Meanwhile, newly appointed CEO Huffman suggested that the policy
changes implemented under Pao would stay and would likely be
augmented by several others. Huffman proposed new content rules
that would prohibit anything that incites harm or violence against an
individual or group of people or harasses, bullies, or abuses. In
addition, a new category would be created, much like Reddits NSFW
(not-safe-for-work) classification, that would quarantine indecent
spaces, making them not searchable or publicly listed (spez, 2015).
It remains to be seen how Reddit will develop in light of these
new policies. However, the resistance by a vocal group of Redditors to
these changes provides further evidence that the technological
affordances, and Reddits platform politics, have cultivated a space
where toxicity is normalized. Huffmans proposed solution, to allow
but not publicize nor profit from hate-filled subreddits, does nothing
to stem the underlying problem. Members of subreddits like
/r/coontown (banned as of August 2015) or /r/CuteFemaleCorpses do
not stay contained to their own toxic spaces, but are participants in
other, more mainstream areas of Reddit. This means that their
retrograde views continue to be implicitly legitimized by Reddit
35
36
References
A Man In Black (2014) How imageboard culture shaped Gamergate.
Available at: http://boingboing.net/2014/12/31/how-imageboardculture-shaped.html (accessed 6 August 2015).
Alfonso F, III (2014a) How Unidan went from being Reddits most
beloved user to its most disgraced. Available at:
http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-unidan-shadownban-votemanipulation-ben-eisenkop/ (accessed 6 August 2015).
Alfonso F, III (2014b) Meet the Reddit power user who helped bring
down r/technology. Available at:
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/reddit-maxwellhill-moderatortechnology-flaw/ (accessed 6 August 2015).
alienth (2014a) Experimental Reddit change: Subreddits may now optout of /r/all. Available at:
http://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/2a32sq/experime
ntal_reddit_change_subreddits_may_now/ (accessed 6 August
2015).
alienth (2014b) Time to talk. Available at:
https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/2fpdax/time
_to_talk/ (accessed 6 August 2015).
atticus138 (2014) This shit is bananas. Available at:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Celebs/comments/2f4woz/this_shit_is_b
ananas/ (accessed 6 August 2015).