Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
( Basic Course )
Fatigue, How and Why
Physics of Fatigue
1 of 120
10-10
Dislocations
10-8
10-6
Crystals
10-4
Specimens
10-2
100
Structures
102
2 of 120
3 of 120
4 of 120
N = 2,000
N = 10,000
N = 40,000
Nf = 170,000
Ewing, J.A. and Humfrey, J.C. The fracture of metals under repeated alterations of stress,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol. A200, 1903, 241-250
Fatigue, How and Why
5 of 120
Crack Nucleation
6 of 120
Polak, J. Cyclic Plasticity and Low Cycle Fatigue Life of Metals, Elsevier, 1991
Fatigue, How and Why
7 of 120
Extrusion
Undeformed
material
Intrusion
Loading
Fatigue, How and Why
Unloading
2009 Darrell Socie, All Rights Reserved
8 of 120
Slip Bands
Ma, B-T and Laird C. Overview of fatigue behavior in copper sinle crystals II Population, size, distribution and growth
Kinetics of stage I cracks for tests at constant strain amplitude, Acta Metallurgica, Vol 37, 1989, 337-348
Fatigue, How and Why
9 of 120
N = 60
N = 240
N = 1200
Fatigue, How and Why
N = 300
N = 2000
2009 Darrell Socie, All Rights Reserved
10 of 120
Crack at Particle
Material: BS L65 Aluminum
Loading: 63 ksi, R=0 for
500,000+ cycles, followed by 68
ksi, R=0 to failure. Cracks found
during 68 ksi loading.
S. Pearson, Initiation of Fatigue Cracks in Commercial Aluminum Alloys and the Subsequent Propagation
of Very Short Cracks, RAE TR 72236, Dec 1972.
Fatigue, How and Why
11 of 120
10
m
James & Morris, ASTM STP 811 Fatigue Mechanisms: Advances in Quantitative Measurement of Physical
Damage, pp. 46-70, 1983.
12 of 120
S. Pearson, Initiation of Fatigue Cracks in Commercial Aluminum Alloys and the Subsequent Propagation
of Very Short Cracks, RAE TR 72236, Dec 1972.
Fatigue, How and Why
13 of 120
14 of 120
Langford and Kusenberger, Initiation of Fatigue Cracks in 4340 Steel, Metallurgical Transactions, Vol 4, 1977, 553-559
15 of 120
Y. Murakami, Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions, 2002
16 of 120
1250
0.6
0.5
1000
750
0.35
500
250
500
1000
1500
2000
17 of 120
18 of 120
Surface Damage
surface
surface
10 m
bulk
100 m
19 of 120
free
surface
Stage I
Fatigue, How and Why
Stage II
20 of 120
S
individual grain
near - tip plastic zone
21 of 120
22 of 120
Inconel 718
= 0.02
Nf = 936
1.0 mm
N = 900
Fatigue, How and Why
23 of 120
Crack Length, mm
F-495
H-491
J-603
I-471
C-399
G-304
1.5
0.5
0
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Cycles
Fatigue, How and Why
24 of 120
da/dN, mm/cycle
10-6
E
D
10-7
A
0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
Crack Length, mm
Akiniwa, Y., Tanaka, K., and Matsui, E.,Statistical Characteristics of Propagation of Small Fatigue Cracks in Smooth
Specimens of Aluminum Alloy 2024-T3, Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A104, 1988, 105-115
Fatigue, How and Why
25 of 120
Strain-Life Data
10m
Strain Amplitude
1mm
fracture
100 m
Crack size
0.1
0.01
10-3
10-4
10-5
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Reversals, 2Nf
Most of the life is spent in microcrack growth in the
plastic strain dominated region
Fatigue, How and Why
26 of 120
27 of 120
28 of 120
Material strength does not play a major role in fatigue crack growth
29 of 120
Maximum Load
30 of 120
Minimum Load
31 of 120
Crack Closure
a
S=0
Fatigue, How and Why
S = 175
2009 Darrell Socie, All Rights Reserved
S = 250
32 of 120
Opening load
Nondamaging portion of loading history
33 of 120
Mode II
in-plane shear
Mode III
out-of-plane shear
34 of 120
Mode I Growth
5 m
35 of 120
Mode II Growth
shear stress
slip bands
10 m
crack growth direction
36 of 120
1.0
0.8
Tension
0.6
0.4
Shear
0.2
Nucleation
100 m crack
0
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
37 of 120
Tension
0.6
0.4
0.2
Shear
Nucleation
0
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
38 of 120
39 of 120
40 of 120
Characterization
Stress Life Curve
Fatigue Limit
41 of 120
Bending Fatigue
stress
stress amplitude
F
Bending stress:
time
stress range
Mc
=
I
42 of 120
SN Curve
Stress Amplitude, MPa
500
Monel Alloy
400
300
200
1x108
5x108
Cycles to Failure
500
400
300
200
105
106
107
108
109
Cycles to Failure
Testing time
@ 30 Hz
Fatigue, How and Why
1 hour
1 day
1 month
1 year
43 of 120
Fatigue Strength
Fatigue Life
Alloy
2014-T4
2024-T4
6061-T6
7075-T6
105
290
297
186
276
106
235
214
152
200
107
186
166
117
166
108
152
145
104
152
109
138
138
90
145
44 of 120
Sharpe et. al. Fatigue Design of Aluminum Components and Structures , 1996
Fatigue, How and Why
45 of 120
104
S
b
= S'f (Nf )
2
1000
fatigue limit
100
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Cycles
The fatigue limit is usually only found in steel laboratory specimens
Fatigue, How and Why
46 of 120
104
surface failures
large inclusions
conventional
fatigue limit
internal
inclusions
1000
100
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
Cycles
47 of 120
Fatigue Damage
10000
S
b
= S'f (Nf )
2
1
1000
10
100
100
101
102
103
104
Cycles
S
Nf = '
2 Sf
105
106
107
1
b
Damage S10
48 of 120
1250
0.6
0.5
1000
750
0.35
500
250
500
1000
1500
2000
49 of 120
50 of 120
SN Materials Data
10000
93 steels
17 aluminums
1000
100
10
1
10
102
103
104
105
Fatigue Life, Reversals
106
107
51 of 120
52 of 120
53 of 120
54 of 120
Strain-Life Data
Stress Amplitude
2
600
500
400
=
+
2
2E
2 K'
300
200
1/ n'
100
0
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
2
During cyclic deformation, the material deforms on a path
described by the cyclic stress strain curve
Strain Amplitude
55 of 120
56 of 120
Strain-Life Data
1
Strain Amplitude
- 2Nf
0.1
0.01
0.001
10-4
10-5
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Reversals, 2Nf
57 of 120
Strain Amplitude
Plastic
0.1
0.01
0.001
Elastic
10-4
10-5
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Reversals, 2Nf
Fatigue, How and Why
58 of 120
Strain-Life Curve
Strain Amplitude
1
0.1
'f
'f
= (2Nf )b + 'f (2Nf )c
2 E
0.01
0.001
10-4
'f
E
2Nt
10-5
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Reversals, 2Nf
Fatigue, How and Why
59 of 120
60 of 120
N Materials Data
10
Strain Amplitude
93 steels
17 aluminums
0.1
10-2
10-3
10-4
1
10
102
103
104
105
106
107
61 of 120
62 of 120
K T = 1+ 2
2a
for a crack
a ~ 10-3
KT ~ 2000
~ 10-9
Traditional material properties like tensile strength
are not very useful for cracked structures
Fatigue, How and Why
63 of 120
K = a
2a
64 of 120
Crack size
2a
da
dN
a2
a1
Cycles
2009 Darrell Socie, All Rights Reserved
65 of 120
10-6
10-7
Kc
10-8
da
= C K m
dN
10-9
m~3
10-10
10-11
10-12
10
KTH
Fatigue, How and Why
100
K,MPa m
66 of 120
Threshold Region
a
K TH > a f
w
operating stresses
67 of 120
68 of 120
K TH
ac = 0.63
u
Smooth specimen fatigue limit
2
K TH
ac = 2.52
u
Fatigue, How and Why
69 of 120
K TH = 5 MPa m
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
70 of 120
10-6
10-7
Kc
10-8
da
= C K m
dN
10-9
10-10
10-11
10-12
10
KTH
Fatigue, How and Why
100
K,MPa m
71 of 120
10-6
Crack Growth Rate, m/cycle
Ferritic-Pearlitic Steel:
252
273
392
415
da
= 6.9 10 12 K MPa m
dN
3.0
Martensitic Steel:
da
= 1.4 10 10 K MPa m
dN
10-7
2.25
10-8
5
10
K, MPam
100
da
= 5.6 10 12 K MPa m
dN
3.25
72 of 120
Sharp, Nordmark and Menzemer, Fatigue Design of Aluminum Components and Structures, 1996
Fatigue, How and Why
73 of 120
Crack Length, mm
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
100
150
200
Cycles x103
250
300
350
Virkler, Hillberry and Goel, The Statistical Nature of Fatigue Crack Propagation, Journal of Engineering Materials
and Technology, Vol. 101, 1979, 148-153
Fatigue, How and Why
74 of 120
Method
Stress-Life
Strain-Life
Crack Growth
Physics
Crack Nucleation
Microcrack Growth
Macrocrack Growth
Size
0.01 mm
0.1 - 1 mm
> 1mm
75 of 120
76 of 120
Fatigue Analysis
Material
Data
Component
Geometry
Analysis
Fatigue
Life Estimate
?
Service
Loading
77 of 120
78 of 120
79 of 120
80 of 120
Life Estimation
Method
Stress-Life
BS 7608
Strain-Life
Crack Growth
Physics
Crack Nucleation
Crack Growth
Microcrack Growth
Macrocrack Growth
Size
0.01 mm
1 - 10 mm
0.1 - 1 mm
> 1mm
81 of 120
P
10000
1000
100
100
101
102
103
104
Cycles
105
106
107
82 of 120
Material
Data
SN curve
Ka, Ks,
Component
Geometry
Kf
Service
Loading
S , Sm
Analysis
Fatigue
Life Estimate
83 of 120
Stress-Life
Major Assumptions:
Most of the life is consumed nucleating cracks
Elastic deformation
Nominal stresses and material strength control
fatigue life
Accurate determination of Kf for each geometry
and material
84 of 120
Stress-Life
Advantages:
Changes in material and geometry can easily be
evaluated
Large empirical database for steel with standard
notch shapes
85 of 120
Stress-Life
Limitations:
Does not account for notch root plasticity
Mean stress effects are often in error
Requires empirical Kf for good results
86 of 120
1000
100
10
105
106
107
Cycles
108
87 of 120
Weld Classifications
D
F2
88 of 120
Material
Data
Component
Geometry
Service
Loading
Weld SN curve
Class
Analysis
Fatigue
Life Estimate
89 of 120
BS 7608
Major Assumptions:
Crack growth dominates fatigue life
Complex weld geometries can be described by a
standard classification
Results independent of material and mean stress
for structural steels
90 of 120
BS 7608
Advantages:
Manufacturing effects are directly included
Large empirical database exists
91 of 120
BS 7608
Limitations:
Difficult to determine weld class for complex
shapes
No benefit for improving manufacturing process
92 of 120
Strain Amplitude
0.1
0.01
0.001
10-4
10-5
100
101
102
103
104
Reversals, 2Nf
105
106
107
93 of 120
Material
Data
N curve
curve
Component
Geometry
Kf
Service
Loading
S , Sm
Analysis
Fatigue
Life Estimate
94 of 120
Strain-Life
Major Assumptions:
Local stresses and strains control fatigue
behavior
Plasticity around stress concentrations
Accurate determination of Kf
95 of 120
Strain-Life
Advantages:
Plasticity effects
Mean stress effects
96 of 120
Strain-Life
Limitations:
Requires empirical Kf
Long life situations where surface finish and
processing variables are important
97 of 120
10-6
10-7
10-8
10-9
10-10
10-11
10-12
1
10
K,MPa m
100
98 of 120
Material
Data
Component
Geometry
Service
Loading
da/dN curve
Analysis
Fatigue
Life Estimate
S , Sm
99 of 120
Crack Growth
Major Assumptions:
Nominal stress and crack size control fatigue life
Accurate determination of initial crack size
100 of 120
Crack Growth
Advantage:
Only method to directly deal with cracks
101 of 120
Crack Growth
Limitations:
Complex sequence effects
Accurate determination of initial crack size
102 of 120
103 of 120
Design Philosophy
Safe Life
Damage Tolerant
104 of 120
Safe Life
Stress Amplitude, MPa
500
400
300
200
99 90
50
10
Percent Survival
100
0
104
105
106
107
108
109
Fatigue Life
105 of 120
Damage Tolerant
Crack size
Inspection
a2
a1
106 of 120
Inspection
A Boeing 777 costs $250,000,000
A new car costs $25,000
For every $1 spent inspecting and maintaining a
B 777 you can spend only 0.01 on a car
107 of 120
Similitude
Failure mechanism
Size Scale
108 of 120
109 of 120
www.FatigueCalculator.com
110 of 120
111 of 120
Finders
112 of 120
Deterministic Analysis
113 of 120
114 of 120
115 of 120
116 of 120
Probabilistic Analysis
117 of 120
118 of 120
119 of 120
120 of 120