Argument: Against (Alma):

Its confusing! Voting for one candidate is straightforward and uncomplicated. Voting for
multiple people for the same position is not intuitive and could confuse voters. This could
cause them to trust the democratic system less, which would undermine our democracy.
Rank choice voting is confusing
Voting for multiple people for the same positions is not intuitive and could
confuse voters
This could cause them to trust the democratic process less, and undermine our
democracy
If rank choice voting becomes legal, people will be able to vote for candidates by ranking their
top choices.
If voters are voting for multiple candidates for the same position, they will be confused.
If voters are confused when they are voting, they will not understand the voting system.
If voters do not understand the voting system, they will not trust the voting system.
This will lead to a lack of trust and will undermine our democracy.
Overarching Conditional Statement
If rank choice voting is instated across the country, voters will trust our democracy less.
Assertion Statements
P: All things that are intuitive are confusing. (F) AB
P: All things that are not intuitive are confusing. (T) AB
Q: Rank choice voting is intuitive. (F) CA
Q: Rank choice voting is not intuitive. (T) CA
S: All people do not trust things that are confusing. (T) EB
S: All people do trust things that are confusing. (F) EB
Status Statements
Intuitive: A
Confusing: B
AB All things that are intuitive are confusing.
BA All things that are confusing are intuitive.
AB All things that are not intuitive are not confusing.
BA All things that are not confusing are not intuitive.
Rank Choice Voting: C
Intuitive: A
CA
Things People Trust: E
Confusing: B
EB

Truth Table
A

(A^B)vC

A^B

C^A