Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DOI 10.1007/s12667-014-0134-4
ORIGINAL PAPER
123
P. Packiam et al.
1 Introduction
Environment friendly solar energy is abundant in nature. The present day solar energy
systems are modular, and have a short gestation period with almost no running cost. The
use of solar power is becoming increasingly important for water pumping applications
in remote, isolated, and non-electrified population due to issues of either accessibility
to the grid or implementation cost. Even grid power fed pumps used for irrigation
purposes need to be studied for various reasons, such as, cost of motor burnouts due
to voltage fluctuations, crop yields affected by short fall in the supply of electricity,
requirement of government subsidies, as well as, transmission & distribution losses.
The main challenges of photovoltaic (PV) system are that its initial installation cost
is high, it has a low irradiation to electric power conversion efficiency and voltagecurrent (V I ), as well as, voltage-power (V P) characteristics are non-linear.
Notwithstanding these drawbacks, the PV systems have emerged as one of the most
potent alternatives to grid power supply for feeding water pump drive system. The
water pump can be broadly classified as DC and AC motor based pumping systems.
Permanent magnet brushless DC (PMBLDC) motors powered by solar power source
with and without a DCDC converter have been used for water pumping applications
[17]. However, difficulties in availability of permanent magnet motors and its high
cost are still major hurdles in their application. In a parallel development, the induction motor based AC water pumping system has found considerable interest among
researchers due to its low cost, low maintenance, rugged design, small sizes, and its
availability as high efficiency motors [821]. Off-grid solar stand-alone water pumping
systems utilizing induction motors can be classified as multistage [814] and single
stage [1518]. The single stage water pumping system is highly efficient, low cost
and simple to control in comparison to multi stage system. In both systems, instead
of battery modules, a water storage tank is considered as an indirect energy storage
device. The size of the tank should be compatible with the capacity of the PV array
and the maximum possible insolation at the location of usage.
The major interest in PV power based system development is in reducing the payback period in terms of improved efficiency and performance, as well as, reducing the
number of components to decrease overall cost. For developing a cost effective, highly
efficient water pumping system, the characterization of balance of system for water
pumping application is a paramount requirement. Therefore, steady state, dynamic
performances, starting of motor performances, and characterization when motor is
connected directly to PV or through intermediate converter are studied for DC motors
[2227]. The current source fed parallel resonant converter based single phase induction motor water pumping system has been proposed [28]. This is simple to be used in
rural areas. However, no study which exclusively characterizes voltage source inverter
based single stage PV water pump employing three phase induction motor has been
carried out. In present days, this system is implemented with the ease.
In this paper, simulation studies are performed with six-step, SPWM, and SVPWM
voltage source inverter control using MATLAB/SIMULINK with SimPower system
tool box. The simulation is done with different value of modulation index (MI). The
system response to the different load torque models is also characterized. The control function is implemented using dsPIC 6010A [29], a 16-bit microcontroller. The
123
q(M Va + N Rs Ia )
(M Va + N Rs Ia )
1
M Io exp
M N B K Tc
N Rsh
(1)
ipv
Ra
ati
di
Q1
on
D1
Q3
D3
Q5
D5
Cdc
PV
Modules
Q2
D2
Q4
D4
Q6
ib ic
ia
ipv
vpv
D6
Q1 Q6
IM
MPPT
Controller
PUMP
123
P. Packiam et al.
Table 1 Specifications of CEL PM150 PV module
Maximum peak power (Pmax )
150 W p to 180 W p
34 V
4.8 A
42.8 V
5A
+0.0004/ K
0.0034/ K
3 m
298 K
298 K
36.6446 V
4.6476 A
123
T1 =
T2 =
n
3 Ts |V | n
cos cos
sin
sin
Vdc
3
3
(2)
n1
n1
3 Ts |V |
cos sin
sin cos
Vdc
3
3
(3)
T0 = Ts T1 T2
(a)
V3 (010)
(b)
V2 (011)
/3
V*
V7 (111)
T2/Tz
T1/Tz
Q1
Q3
Q5
V5 (100)
T1/2
T2/2
0
0
T2/2
T1/2
T0/2
T0/4
V0 (000)
Q5Q3Q1
V1 (001)
T0/4
V4(110)
(4)
V6 (101)
123
P. Packiam et al.
The SVPWM pattern, shown in Fig. 3b shows the placement of zero vectors so as to
minimize the switching losses and conduction of upper switches Q 1 , Q3 , and Q5 in
the first sector. The complementary switching signals are fed to the lower switches.
For a given sector 1 to sector 6, PWM duty is updated as given in Eqs. (5a)(5f)
respectively for switching the upper switches.
D1H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
D3H = T2 + T0 /2
D5H = T0 /2
(5a)
D1H = T1 + T0 /2
D3H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
D5H = T0 /2
(5b)
D1H = T0 /2
D3H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
D5H = T2 + T0 /2
(5c)
D1H = T0 /2
D3H = T1 + T0 /2
D5H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
(5d)
D1H = T2 + T0 /2
D3H = T0 /2
D5H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
(5e)
D1H = T1 + T2 + T0 /2
D3H = T0 /2
D5H = T1 + T0 /2
(5f)
123
(a)
jLlr
jLls
Rs/e
Ir
Vs /e
Is
Im
jLm
Rr/se
(b)
Fig. 4 a Per phase equivalent circuit of an induction motor, b DC representation of the system
Table 2 Specifications of induction motor
Power
2 HP
6
Configuration
Delta
4.1583
0.01274 H
Voltage
240 V
Stator inductance (L ls )
Current
6A
Rotor inductance (L lr )
0.01875 H
Speed
1,420 rpm
Mutual inductance (L m )
0.404 H
Frequency
50 Hz
PF
0.81
Pole pair
Efficiency
77 %
(7)
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 5 Expanded waveforms of the PV array and machine parameters during MPPT tracking: a temperature,
b insolation, c perturbation of frequency, d torque, e rotor speed of the motor, f variation of MI, g PV voltage,
h PV current, i PV power, j variation of motor flux
Fig. 6 a The responses of the PV power when the system is operated at steady frequency. b The responses
of the PV voltage and current when the system is operated at steady frequency
123
The torque and power models of a centrifugal pump can be represented using Eqs.
(8) and (9) respectively,
2
(8)
TL = km m
3
sl
3
Pm = km m
= km 1
e3
(9)
e
Generally, the load torque offered by the centrifugal pump at high speed can be optimized [23], and it is given by,
1.8
TL = km m
(10)
Table 3 PV power tracking due to operating the system at steady frequency
Voc
(V)
Vm
(V)
Isc
(A)
Im
(A)
Pm
(W)
Vm (actual) Im (actual)
(V)
(A)
Pm (actual) Tracking
(W)
efficiency
(%)
300
267
4.4
1,175
256.5
1,192
4.647
98.57 %
Fig. 7 a THD of Phase A line currentsix step mode, b PV power and frequency perturbationsix step,
c Torque and speed of the motorsix step
123
P. Packiam et al.
where, km is the constant of the water pump, m is the rotor speed in rad/s, e is the
supply frequency in rad/s, sl is the slip frequency in rad/s. Thus, the speed and torque
of the water pump is regulated according to the availability of maximum PV power
by varying the supply frequency.
123
P pv (W)
Speed (rpm)
Fe (Hz)
THD (%)
Six step
1,165
1,204
41.75
47.99
SPWM
1,160
1,184
42.75
10.4
SVPWM
1,175
1,210
43
3.57
Figure 5aj illustrate the dynamic behavior of the PV array and machine parameters,
namely, insolation, temperature, frequency perturbation, torque, speed, MI, voltage,
current, PV power, and flux of the motor for a time period of 0.61.6 s.
Figure 5g, h show that when frequency is perturbed for the stated conditions, the
PV voltage decreases and current increases towards the MPP as shown in Fig. 5i. As
is evident from the Fig. 5j, when the flux is at low, the PV power is at the maximum,
otherwise, it reverses. Hence, the tracking or utilization of the PV power depends on
utilization of active power by the motor. Thus, the tracking efficiency of the PV power
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 10 The responses of the
PV power and machine
parameters for MI 0.75 at
insolation 0.8 SUN temperature
at 25 C during MPPT tracking:
a insolation, b PV power, c rotor
speed, d torque, e motor flux
is directly related to the efficiency of the motor. Figure 5c shows that the frequency
perturbation undergoes bounded oscillations around the MPP.
It is observed from Fig. 6a, b that the PV voltage, current, and hence power, as well
as, motor flux, torque, speed settle at optimized values when the system is operated at
the steady frequency during the steady state as presented in Table 3.
The steady frequency is calculated from maximum and minimum values of frequency oscillation when it oscillates around the MPP. The system operation closer to
the MPP depends on resolution of the perturbation frequency available for calculation
of the steady frequency.
123
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 12 The responses of the
PV power and machine
parameters for MI 0.85 at
insolation 0.8 SUN temperature
at 25 C during MPPT tracking:
a insolation, b PV power, c rotor
speed, d torque, e motor flux
state, since the inverter is operated at the fundamental switching frequency and AC
voltage is not regulated.
The same analysis is done with the SPWM, and SVPWM techniques. They are
presented in Figs. 8a and 9c. The inferences made from response curves, namely, PV
power utilization, speed of the pump, perturbation frequency, and the THD obtained
with six-step, SPWM, and SVPWM are tabulated in Table 4.
They clearly show that the SVPWM technique is better than the two other techniques. The SVPWM utilizes more DC link voltage than the SPWM for the same MI
and thus accordingly sets the flux value. It also exhibits better THD. The PV power
extraction in six step mode switching is not as good as in SVPWM mode due to poor
123
torque response. It is observed from Figs. 7c, 8c and 9c that effective voltage delivered
to the motor can be adjusted to tune the active power utilization of the motor at high
speed. This demonstrates that PWM technique is an attractive option to be employed
with this system to generate a variable voltage/variable frequency power source.
It is also evident from these response curves that extraction of PV power depends
on the utilization of active power of the machine. Thus, better tracking efficiency
corresponds to an improved efficiency and performance of induction motor drive,
since the tracking is performed by changes in Rr /se . The SVPWM technique is
preferred over other two methods to control the voltage source inverter because of
its high DC link voltage utilization as compared with the SPWM, as well as, a better
THD.
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 14 The responses of the
PV power and machine
parameters for MI 0.95 at
insolation 0.8 SUN temperature
at 25 C during MPPT tracking:
a insolation, b PV power, c rotor
speed, d torque, e motor flux
123
Figs. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 respectively. The results are tabulated in Table 5
for comparison. Though, an induction motor is controlled by keeping v/f constant, the
control is similar to a constant voltage variable frequency technique, since an increase
in frequency leads to a decrease in flux.
It is also inferred from the table that for the same speed, an increase in MI introduces
more torque ripples. The magnitude of torque ripple is in between 6.37.3 N m for MI
of 0.75 as compared with MI 0.95 for which it varies between 6 to 8.4 N m. When a
MI proportional to frequency is used (v/ f = k), it results in a better torque response,
and the difference in speed is also not larger when compared to a MI of 0.95. The
differences in speed and power utilization for MI of 0.75 and 0.85 are resulting from
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 16 The responses of the
PV power and machine
parameters for MI M I = k Fe
at insolation 0.8 SUN
temperature at 25 C during
MPPT tracking: a insolation, b
PV power, c rotor speed, d
torque, e motor flux
123
123
P. Packiam et al.
Table 5 PV power and motor parameter variations with different MI at high and low insolation
Parameter (SUN)
MI = 0.75
MI = 0.85
MI = 0.95
MI/Fe = k
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.8
MI
MI
37.5
31.75
37.75
31.75
37.25
31.75
0.77
0.7
Steady
Frequency (Hz)
0.6
PV power (W)
902
661
913
663
894
666
902
669
Speed (rpm)
1,059
909
1,068
911
1,058
912
1,058
913
Torquea (N m)
Flux (V s)
6.3
5.5
6.1
5.2
4.6
6.3
5.6
7.3
6.4
7.2
8.4
7.5
7.4
6.4
0.49
0.57
0.496
0.58
0.51
0.589
0.495
0.55
Fig. 18 The responses of the PV power and machine parameters for the volumetric pump load torque at
MI 0.75, insolation 1 SUN, temperature at 25 C during MPPT tracking: a insolation, b PV power, c rotor
speed, d torque, e motor flux
inverter circuit. Figure 18 shows the utilization of the PV power, speed, torque, and
status of the flux for the displacement pump versus time.
Figures 19 and 20 present the response curves for a centrifugal pump and the optimized model of a centrifugal pump, respectively. The inferences from these responses
are tabulated in Table 6.
It presents the fact that the centrifugal pump is the most appropriate for a PV water
pumping systems. The volumetric pump can also be considered if km value is very
123
small. It shows that the speed of the pump is increased until the mechanical power of
the pump matches the optimum power of the PV array. Thus, it results in high efficiency
of the system. It is evident from Fig. 20 that the system shows a better performance in
terms of ripples when the extracted PV power is closer to the optimum. The control
system doesnt require a separate controller to optimize the load torque at high speeds.
The optimization of flux can be achieved by properly choosing MI.
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 20 The responses of the
PV power and machine
parameters for the optimized
load torque model of a
centrifugal pump at MI 0.75,
insolation 1 SUN, temperature at
25 C during MPPT tracking: a
insolation, b PV power, c rotor
speed, d torque, e motor flux
4 Experimental validation
The experimental validation is conducted on laboratory prototype shown in Fig. 21a,
in which variable voltage, variable current, and load torque proportional to speed
(TL = k) are established.
As is evident from the simulation studies, when the induction motor is fed from
a variable voltage/variable frequency source, the MPPT tracking in the single stage
water pump system is established by change in impedance (Rr /se ) seen by the power
123
Parameter
TL = k
TL = k2
TL = k1.8
Fe (Hz)
43
46.5
64
PV power (W)
1,175
1,172
1,187
Speed (rpm)
1,192
1,286
1,758
Torque (N m)
7.8
7.2
5.34
Flux (V s)
0.43
0.39
0.28
98.57
98.32
99.58
Efficiency (%)
83
83
83
supply. Thus, it is imperative to realize the same technique while the PV emulator of
the system analyzed here is developed. This is emulated by mechanically coupling the
separately excited DC shunt generator with the induction motor shaft. Field winding
of a separately excited DC shunt generator is fed through a constant current source.
The speed command changes the slip speed s, which results in change of impedance as
seen by the power supply module. The generated armature voltage (Va ) is proportional
to the speed of the motor (m ), and it is given as,
Va = ks m
(11)
Va
RL
(12)
where kt is the torque constant and Ia is the current through resistance R L . If the
R L is kept constant, the load torque developed by DC motor on induction motor is
characterized by the Eq. (13) after substituting the Eq. (11) on Eq. (12),
T = kt
ks m
RL
= K m
(13)
123
P. Packiam et al.
Fig. 21 a Block diagram of developed laboratory prototype. b Developed laboratory prototype as water
pump emulator
123
Fig. 22 a RS232 recorded data of frequency perturbation during MPP tracking. b The load voltage and
total supply voltage during MPP tracking. c Load current and Speed of an induction mtor during MPP
tacking. d Supply voltage and current during MPP tracking. e Induction motor RMS voltage. f Induction
motor RMS current. g Voltage and current waveforms indicating steady frequency, RMS value of voltage
and current. h Power factor reading sampled at steady state
123
P. Packiam et al.
and performance of the control system. As is explained in simulation, frequency perturbation undergoes bounded oscillation. When the system is operated at a steady
frequency, the tracking efficiency and power utilization are inferred from the power
factor reading.
5 Conclusions
The modeling and simulation of a single stage PV water pumping system is carried
out using MATLAB/SIMULINK with SimPower system tool box. The SVPWM
control technique is preferred based on the simulation studies performed with sixstep, SPWM, and SVPWM control.
On reaching the MPP by modified PAO, the steady frequency (Fsteady ) is calculated
from the frequency which undergoes bounded oscillations around the MPP. The speed
and flux of the motor settle corresponding to the optimum power of the PV array when
the system is operated at Fsteady . The v/f control technique is considered to improve
flux responses at lower range of frequencies and during MPP tracking.
The simulation results with different value of MI are used to select the optimum
slope of MI/frequency for tuning the active power utilization, thus the power factor
of the machine in real time operation is improved. The system responses to the different load torque models illustrate that the tracking of PV power at high efficiency
corresponds to utilization of power by pump. The experimental validation demonstrates the simulated characteristics. Thus, the system under investigation presents
high efficiency, better performance, minimum hardware, low maintenance, and simple topology for the water pumping application.
References
1. Appelbaum, J., Sarma, M.S.: The operation of permanent magnet DC motors powered by a common
source of solar cells. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 4, 635642 (1989)
2. V. Chary Mummadi, Steady-state and dynamic performance analysis of PV supplied DC motors fed
from intermediate power converter. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 61, 365381 (2000)
3. Senjyu, T., Veerachary, M., Uezato, K.: Steady-state analysis of PV supplied separately excited DC
motor fed from IDB converter. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 71, 493510 (2002)
4. Mokeddem, A., Midoun, A., Kadri, D., Hiadsi, S., Raja, I.A.: Performance of a directly-coupled PV
water pumping system. Energy Convers. Manag. 52, 30893095 (2011)
5. Swamy, C.L.P., Singh, B., Singh, B.P.: Experimental investigations on a permanent magnet brushless
DC motor fed by a PV array for a water pumping system. ASME J. Sol. Energ. Eng. Trans. 122,
129132 (2000)
6. Liebenberg, R., Enslin, J.H.R., VanderMerwe, F.S.: High efficiency, long-life actuator for PV water
pumping applications. Renew. Energy 6, 10291032 (1995)
7. Kaldellis, J.K., Spyropoulos, G.C., Kavadias, K.A., Koronaki, I.P.: Experimental validation of
autonomous PV-based water pumping system optimum sizing. Renew. Energy 34, 11061113 (2009)
8. Akbaba, M.: Matching induction motors to PVG for maximum power transfer. Desalination 209, 3138
(2007)
9. Daud, A.-K., Mahmoud, M.M.: Solar powered induction motor-driven water pump operating on a
desert well, simulation and field tests. Renew. Energy 30, 701714 (2005)
10. Arrouf, M., Bouguechal, N.: Vector control of an induction motor fed by a photovoltaic generator.
Appl. Energy 74, 159167 (2003)
123
123