Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
pubs.acs.org/Biomac
generating nonspherical particles make use of a capillary owbased approach, such as microuidics, which often occurs in
combination with lithography and photopolymerization.1618
The capillary ow-based approach oers a number of
advantages over conventional ow-control technology or
manipulation techniques because it ensures highly versatile
geometry and can be used to produce monodisperse nonspherical polymeric microparticles with a diverse range of
shapes. For instance, Xu et al. and Dendukuri et al. formed
liquid droplets with a microuidic device, shaped the droplets
in a microchannel, and polymerized them to form solid
particles of several nonspherical geometries.19,20 Unfortunately,
the UV-polymerization process is very hazardous to biological
applications and UV-sensitive materials. Other groups have
developed shape-controlled microparticles assisted by microuidics using natural polymers such as polysaccharides.12,2126
Two strategies were adopted to control the shape of the
hydrogel microparticles: on-chip by tuning ow rates,
composition, and channel geometries15,26 and o-chip at uid
interfaces by tuning interfacial tension between the on-chip
synthesized microparticles and the collecting bath that generally
contains the cross-linker.2123 Alginate-based rods, threads,
plugs, disks, pears, and tadpoles or chitosan-based hemispherical and discoidal microparticles were thus obtained. In
INTRODUCTION
Microbeads or hydrogel microparticles have attracted great
attention over the past 2 decades owing to their wide
applications in drug delivery, adsorbents, and optical
devices.14 The performance and application of microbeads
generally depend on their size and shape. Nonspherical
microbeads are more desired because of their unique properties
such as anisotropic responses to external force and large surface
area as well as their use as building blocks for hierarchical
superstructures formation. Shape-controlled microbeads have
found applications in several elds, such as uses as the
components of new ow measurement devices, as regularly
sized beads in liquid crystal displays,5 or as model systems to
mimic anisotropic biological cells and to synthesize materials
with unique crystal structures.6 Moreover, for the biological and
medical areas, shape-controlled biocompatible and biodegradable hydrogel microparticles can be applied to drug delivery
systems79 and cell immobilization10 as well as cell cultures and
biosensing bers.11,12 However, methods to prepare shapecontrolled microparticles are limited. Conventional emulsion
and suspension polymerization to generate shape-controlled
nonspherical microparticles is unpractical because the minimization of interfacial energy leads to the formation of a
spherical shape during most syntheses.13,14 In recent years, a
number of reports have emerged that directly address this
bottleneck through the manipulation of previously fabricated
spherical particles into nonspherical geometries and ab initio
synthesis of nonspherical particles.15 Synthesis methods for
2014 American Chemical Society
Biomacromolecules
Article
Figure 1. Schematic of the microuidic ow-focusing geometry used for pectin hydrogel microparticle formation. A pressure-driven ow controller
was used to supply the three liquids to the device: pectin or pectin + carbonate calcium (CaCO3) (inlet 1), anhydrous or water-saturated dimethyl
carbonate (DMC) (inlet 2), and DMC + calcium chloride (CaCl2) or DMC + acetic acid (inlet 3). An outlet capillary tubing allowed the hydrogel
microparticles to be collected in a CaCl2 bath. Zone A: pectin microdroplet generation zone resulting from the ow-focusing geometry. Zone B:
solvent diusion zone resulting from the anhydrous dimethyl carbonate (DMC). Zone C: cross-linking zone resulting from the diusion of calcium
ions within the pectin microdroplets. Micrographs of droplets in microchannels owing in the three zones are also reported.
addition, signicant dierences in the release behavior of drugloaded alginate hydrogel microparticles that were dependent on
their morphology (spherical, pear-like, or mushroom shape)
were clearly demonstrated.23 An alternative strategy was
recently adopted to control the shape of microparticles,
which is called microuidic diusion-induced self-assembly
(f DISA).27,28 By exploring the phenomenon of water
diusion-induced self-assembly of silica particles in microuidic
channels using dimethyl carbonate as the organic phase, Fang et
al. demonstrated that both the geometric connement
experienced by the droplet and the local Peclet number are
responsible for the nal particle shape.27,28 Two shape zones, a
doughnut or bowl-like morphology, were clearly distinguishable
depending on the geometric connement and the Peclet
number. The authors argued that these shape-controlled
morphologies, where the solgel transition of silica was
assisted by a f DISA process, could be extended to other
complex uids such as nanoparticles or biopolymers. It is
therefore interesting to note that the dimethyl carbonate
organic phase, because of its water immiscibility and solubility
properties, was also previously used to shrink alginate
biopolymer microparticles within a microuidic device to
reduce the size of the droplets.29 Such a process that is able to
control both shape and size was, however, never demonstrated
on polysaccharides such as, for example, pectin. The advantages
of pectin compared to other polysaccharides come from its
structural diversity, particularly charge density and branching,
that depends on its botanical source. The charge density
resulting from the presence of carboxylic groups, either
randomly or blockwise distributed, as well as the branches
present along the pectin chains will give unique cross-linking
properties (i.e., kinetics and density of cross-linking) to pectin
compared to other polysaccharides such as alginate.30,31 The
carboxylic groups of galacturonic acid in pectins can be methylesteried, with the degree of esterication (DE) distinguishing
high-methoxylated (HM) pectin from low-methoxylated (LM)
pectin. LM-pectins (with a DE < 50%) are able to cross-link
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Biomacromolecules
Article
Figure 2. Mode of pectin cross-linking in zone C. External gelation occurred by the diusion of calcium ions (CaCl2) from the DMC continuous
phase to the pectin microdroplets; internal gelation occurred by dissolution of CaCO3 particles through the diusion of acetic acid from the DMC
continuous phase to the pectin microdroplets.
100 m. The microsystem was made of three zones: a ow-focusing
junction where droplets of pectin were formed (zone A), a rst
serpentine channel where droplets shrank by solvent diusion (zone
B), and a second serpentine channel where cross-linking within pectin
microdroplets took place through calcium bridging (zone C) (Figure
1). The widths and lengths of serpentine channels in zones B and C
were, respectively, 200 m and 52 cm and 450 m and 98 cm.
Dimensions of the channels in the microuidic device and at the
droplet formation zone were determined by prolometry (Figure S1,
Supporting Information).
Chemicals and Solutions. Low-methoxyl citrus pectin (Mw = 169
250 g/mol, Mw/Mn = 2.03) was purchased from Cargill France SAS,
had a DE value of 30%, and contained 78.5% galacturonic acid. Pectin
was solubilized in 50 mM MES buer pH 6 at 40 C or in deionized
water at room temperature under magnetic stirring for 2 h and was
then stored at 4 C. The pectin solutions were degassed under vacuum
and ltered through a 5 m lter (Puradisc lter, FP 30 mm 5.0CN,
Whatman). The pH value of pectin solutions prepared in deionized
water was then adjusted to around 7 with 1 M NaOH. Anhydrous
dimethyl carbonate 99% (DMC) (no. D152927-1L), calcium chloride,
carbonate calcium, and acetic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(France). N-(3-(Dimethylamino)propyl)-N-ethyl-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (SigmaAldrich, France) were used for covalent coupling of uoresceinamine
isothiocyanate (FITC; Sigma-Aldrich France; exc 488 nm and em
500530 nm) to citrus pectin through activation of the polysaccharide
carboxyl groups, as described by Ogushi et al.35
Preparation of Pectin Hydrogel Microparticles. Emulsication and Shrinkage of Pectin Microdroplets. Pectin microdroplets
were achieved by emulsifying a 5, 10, or 20 g/L aqueous solution of
pectin in DMC as the continuous oil phase in the microuidic devices.
The aqueous liquid phase broke up in the continuous oil phase to
generate W/O emulsion microdroplets in zone A (Figure 1). The two
immiscible liquids were supplied to the microchannels using a
Microuidic Flow Control Systems MFCS-4C-1000 (Fluigent,
France) as a pressure-driven ow controller. The ow rates varied in
the range of 12 L/min for inlet 1 and 33120 L/min for inlet 2.
The PDMS device was linked to the MFCS through a poly(tetrauoroethylene) (PTFE) tube (0.3 mm i.d. 0.76 mm o.d.
with a length of 350 mm) (Fisher Scientic, no. 39240). The size of
the microdroplets was controlled by varying the pressure of the two
immiscible liquids. DMC with water content in the range of zero to
saturation was used as the continuous phase, which allowed the
Biomacromolecules
Article
Figure 3. Scanning electronic microscopy images of pectin microparticles obtained by (A) solvent diusion resulting from anhydrous DMC without
a gelation step, (B) solvent diusion with external gelation for (b1) an initial Cpectin = 5 g/L or (b2) initial Cpectin = 10 and 20 g/L, (C) solvent
diusion with internal gelation for (c1) an initial Cpectin = 510 g/L or (c2) initial Cpectin = 20 g/L, and (D) without solvent diusion and (d1)
external gelation for an initial Cpectin = 10 g/L or (d2) internal gelation for initial Cpectin = 20 g/L. Scales bars: 10 m.
Biomacromolecules
Article
Table 1. Diameter (D; m) of Pectin Microdroplets and Hydrogel Microparticles during the Dierent Steps of the On-Chip
Process and the O-Chip Microscopic Observationsa
diameter (m)
external gelation (CaCl2)
and solvent diusion
C = 5 g/L
C = 10 g/L
C = 20 g/L
external gelation (CaCl2)
without solvent diusion
C = 10 g/L
internal gelation (CaCO3)
and solvent diusion
C = 5 g/L
C = 10 g/L
C = 20 g/L
internal gelation (CaCO3)
without solvent diusion
C = 5 g/L
C = 10 g/L
C = 20 g/L
no gelation and solvent diusion
zone A zone B
zone C
phase contrast
microscopy
morphological transition
130
135
135
30
45
48
30
45
45
42
53
57
22
24
42
spherical doughnut
spherical spherical
spherical spherical
130
130
130
175250b
120200b
spherical anisotropic
120
120
125
30
30
40
30
30
40
40
40
53
24
31
42
spherical doughnut
spherical doughnut
spherical doughnut
120
120
120
115
130
125
130
40
140
40
140
44
18 (sphere)23 (doughnut)
45 (sphere)32 (doughnut)
46
42
spherical
spherical
spherical
spherical
The dierences in size between the on-chip and o-chip optical microscopy observations arose from some dehydration processes resulting from
osmotic pressure dierences because of the high calcium concentrations on-chip, thus reducing the size of the on-chip microdroplets and
microparticles. For the o-chip phase-contrast and scanning electron microscopy observations, discrepancies came from the dehydration process
mandatory for SEM sample preparation (despite the supercritically dried method used). The on-chip/o-chip morphological transition was,
therefore, conrmed by both optical and electron microscopies, giving strong condence to the absence of morphological changes induced by SEM
sample preparation. bMaximum length corresponding to the sum of the two major axes (B + D) of mushroom-like microparticles (see Table 2).
Biomacromolecules
Article
Table 2. Volumes of Pectin Microdroplets and Hydrogel Microparticles and Evaluation of Their Pectin Concentrations during
the Dierent Steps of the On-Chip Process and the O-Chip Optical Microscopic Observations
a
Zones A and C: the volume when droplets were slightly deformed was calculated assuming an oblate ellipsoid with a volume V = (4/3)(abc), with
a = b = l/2 and c = h/2. The same calculation was applied for microparticles issued from internal gelation without solvent diusion (C = 20 g/L).
b
The equation of a sphere was used for the doughnut-like and ellipsoidal shapes, which were not clearly distinguishable by optical microscopy but
only by SEM.
Biomacromolecules
Article
Biomacromolecules
Article
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the surface of pectin hydrogel microparticles. Scale bars: 1 m. (A) No gelation and solvent diusion. Pectin/
anhydrous DMC/water-saturated DMC. (B) External/internal gelation and solvent diusion. Pectin + CaCO3/anhydrous DMC/CaCl2-saturated
DMC. (C) Internal gelation without solvent diusion. Pectin + CaCO3/water-saturated DMC/acetic acid-saturated DMC. (D) External gelation
without solvent diusion. Pectin/water-saturated DMC/CaCl2-saturated DMC.
the droplets was very fast; thus, pectins within the droplets had
insucient time to diuse from the surface to the center of the
droplet. The microuidic drying and condensation can thus be
tuned by varying the parameters of D0/h and Pe, providing a
starting point to control the geometry of a 3D microstructure
by droplet-based microuidics. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the rst test of the ability to accurately engineer
anisotropy in pectin particles by an on-chip microuidics
approach.
To summarize the on-chip/o-chip morphological transitions induced by ionic gelation and the presence or absence of
solvent diusion from initially spherical (or elliptical) microdroplets, two routes of gelation (internal or external) lead to
isotropic and anisotropic hydrogel microparticles. Although the
on-chip process is very powerful and reproducible for tuning
the shape as a function of connement, the pectin
concentration, and the mode of gelation, better control of the
o-chip mushroom-like morphology by designing a new
microuidic device to deform on-chip pregelled microdroplets
would be very promising. This approach is currently under
investigation to create very original biopolymeric hydrogel
microparticles of tunable size for controlled release applications.
Surface Microstructure of Pectin Hydrogel Microparticles. The microstructure of the surface of the pectin
hydrogel microparticles, probed by SEM, was useful for
attempting to correlate microuidic diusion-induced selfassembly and surface porosity. The solvent-diusion process
coupled to gelation (internal or external) or to the absence of
gelation did not have a drastic eect on the surface
microstructure of the pectin hydrogel microparticles (Figure
4). The rather smooth surfaces were uniformly covered because
of condensation and subsequent pectin chain merging was
induced by water uptake from the DMC continuous phase. In
addition, the mode of gelation and the pectin concentration had
no impact on the surface of the microparticles, in contrast to
what was observed for their shape. Without solvent diusion,
the morphological transitions previously observed for the
Biomacromolecules
Article
Figure 5. Optical microscopy images of pectin hydrogel microparticles with spherical (a), doughnut-like (b), and mushroom-like (c) morphologies
after drying (1) and rehydration during 48 h of incubation at 37 C in 500 mM MES buer, pH 5.0 (2). Scales bars: 50 m.
Biomacromolecules
Article
(1) Das, M.; Zhang, H.; Kumacheva, E. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2006,
36, 117142.
(2) Zhang, H.; Tumarkin, E.; Sullan, R. M. A.; Walker, G. C.;
Kumacheva, E. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 527538.
(3) Panda, P.; Ali, S.; Lo, E.; Chung, B. G.; Hatton, T. A.;
Khademhosseini, A.; Doyle, P. S. Lab Chip 2008, 8, 10561061.
(4) Fiddes, L. K.; Young, E. W. K.; Kumacheva, E.; Wheeler, A. R.
Lab Chip 2007, 7, 863867.
(5) Yin, Y. D.; Xia, Y. N. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 267271.
(6) Zheng, B.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76,
49774982.
(7) Zhang, X. Z.; Lewis, P. J.; Chu, C. C. Biomaterials 2005, 26,
32993309.
(8) Dai, C. Y.; Wang, B. C.; Zhao, H. W. Colloids Surf., B 2005, 41,
117120.
(9) De Geest, B. G.; Urbanski, J. P.; Thorsen, T.; Demeester, J.; De
Smedt, S. C. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1027510279.
(10) Sugiura, S.; Oda, T.; Izumida, Y.; Aoyagi, Y.; Satake, M.; Ochiai,
A.; Ohkohchi, N.; Nakajima, M. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 33273331.
(11) Yamada, M.; Sugaya, S.; Naganuma, Y.; Seki, M. Soft Matter
2012, 8, 31223130.
(12) Jeong, W.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Mensing, G.; Beebe, D. J.
Lab Chip 2004, 4, 576580.
(13) Berkland, C.; Kim, K. K.; Pack, D. W. J. Controlled Release 2001,
73, 5974.
(14) Carturan, G.; Dal Toso, R.; Boninsegna, S.; Dal Monte, R. J.
Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 20872098.
(15) Champion, J. A.; Katare, Y. K.; Mitragotri, S. J. Controlled Release
2007, 121, 39.
(16) Zhao, L. B.; Pan, L.; Zhang, K.; Guo, S. S.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.;
Chen, Y.; Zhao, X. Z.; Chan, H. L. W. Lab Chip 2009, 9, 29812986.
(17) Nisisako, T.; Hatsuzawa, T. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2010, 9, 427
437.
(18) Lewis, C. L.; Lin, Y.; Yang, C.; Manocchi, A. K.; Yuet, K. P.;
Doyle, P. S.; Yi, H. Langmuir 2010, 26, 1343613441.
(19) Xu, S. Q.; Nie, Z. H.; Seo, M.; Lewis, P.; Kumacheva, E.; Stone,
H. A.; Garstecki, P.; Weibel, D. B.; Gitlin, I.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 724728.
(20) Dendukuri, D.; Tsoi, K.; Hatton, T. A.; Doyle, P. S. Langmuir
2005, 21, 21132116.
(21) Seo, M.; Nie, Z. H.; Xu, S. Q.; Lewis, P. C.; Kumacheva, E.
Langmuir 2005, 21, 47734775.
(22) Liu, K.; Ding, H.-J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, X.-Z. Langmuir
2006, 22, 94539457.
(23) Yang, C.-H.; Huang, K.-S.; Wang, C.-Y.; Hsu, Y.-Y.; Chang, F.R.; Lin, Y.-S. Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 31733180.
(24) Dang, T. D.; Joo, S. W. Colloids Surf., B 2013, 102, 766771.
(25) Hu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.
Biomicrofluidics 2012, 6, 026502-1026502-9.
(26) Marquis, M.; Renard, D.; Cathala, B. Biomacromolecules 2012,
13, 11971203.
(27) Fang, A.; Gaillard, C.; Douliez, J.-P. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23,
46604662.
(28) Fang, A.; Gosse, C.; Gaillard, C.; Zhao, X.; Davy, J. Lab Chip
2012, 12, 49604963.
(29) Rondeau, E.; Cooper-White, J. J. Langmuir 2008, 24, 6937
6945.
(30) Williams, M. A. K.; Cucheval, A.; Nasseri, A. T.; Ralet, M. C.
Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 16671675.
(31) Morris, G. A.; Ralet, M. C. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 88, 1488
1491.
(32) Sikorski, P.; Mo, F.; Skjak-Braek, G.; Stokke, B. T.
Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 20982103.
CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrated the generation of pectin hydrogel microparticles of complex shapes either by combining the
phenomenon of gelation and water diusion-induced selfassembly in microuidic channels (on-chip) or by the
deformation of the pregelled droplets outside the channels
(o-chip) at a uiduid interface. We proved that by tuning
the mode of pectin cross-linking (CaCl2 vs CaCO3) and the
degree of shrinking (water content in the organic continuous
phase) we can control the shape of the nal particles. Sphere,
doughnut-like, oblate ellipsoid, or mushroom-like morphologies
were thus produced, demonstrating the ability to control the
formation of anisotropic biopolymer-based hydrogel microparticles using microuidics. The swelling capacities of the
driedrehydrated microparticles of dierent shapes (sphere,
doughnut-like, and mushroom-like) as a function of pH will
open opportunities for their use in applications in areas where
dried materials are preferred for economic reasons. Our
approach can also be extended to hydrogel microparticles
formation from other anionic biopolymers, providing new
opportunities to produce biomimetic microgels with various
anisotropic dimensions for applications in drug delivery, optical
devices, and advanced materials formation. For instance, by
incorporating functional materials or active components inside
the biopolymer network, functional doughnut-like or ellipsoidal
hydrogel microparticles can be tailor-made for specic
applications such as magnetic actuation or as a drug carrier.
These promising and original biopolymer-based hydrogel
microparticles could also be good candidates for food
applications where the modulation of avors as a function of
time or temperature would be mandatory.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
*
REFERENCES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge N. Stephan for use of MEB facilities at IMN
(Nantes, France) and for expertise. We also acknowledge I.
Capron and H. Bizot for fruitful discussions and B. Bouchet
1577
Biomacromolecules
Article
1578