Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Practical no: 05
Osmotic dehydration of
vegetables by using brine
solution.
B.P.D. Abeywardhana.
AS2013008.
Introduction
Osmotic dehydration
Osmotic dehydration is a process that entails the partial of water of food items such as vegetables
& fruits. Osmotic dehydration works by soaking food in a higher osmotic pressure solution. The
diffusion of water is accompanied by the simultaneous counter diffusion of solutes from the
osmotic solution into the tissue since the cell membrane responsible for osmotic transport is not
perfectly selective, solutes present in the cells (organic acids, reducing sugars, minerals, flavours
and pigment) can also be leached into the osmotic solution, which affect the organoleptic and
nutritional characteristics of the plant.
Osmotic dehydration has received greater attention in recent years as an effective method for
preservation of fruits and vegetables. Being a simple process, it facilitates processing of tropical
fruits & vegetables such as banana, sputa, pineapple, mango and leafy vegetables etc. with
retention of initial fruits & vegetables characteristic color, aroma and nutritional compounds. It is
less energy intensive than air or vacuum drying process because it can be conducted at low or
ambient temperature. It has potential advantage for the processing industry to maintain the food
quality and to preserve the wholesomeness of the food. It involves dehydration of fruit slices in
two stages removal of water using as an osmotic agent (osmotic concentration) and subsequent
dehydration in a dryer where moisture content is further reduced to make the product shelf
stable.
Osmotic concentration is the process of water removal from fruits and vegetables, because the
cell membranes are semi-permeable and allow water to pass through them more rapidly than
sugar. During osmosis small quantity of fruit acid is removed along with water.
It is a dynamic process, in which water and acids are removed at first and then move slowly,
while sugar penetration is very slight at first but increases with time. Therefore, the
characteristics of the products can be varied by controlling temperature, sugar syrup
8) Acid removal and sugar intake by fruits modified the composition and improves the taste
and acceptability which is called candying effect.
Material
Cucumber
Salt
Knife
Cutting board
Conductometer
Refractometer
Jam bottle
Procedure
Firstly 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% solutions were prepared. Then cucumber was washed and
peeled off. Then small equal size cucumber pieces were cut. Then 5g of cucumber were
measured in a moisture dish and was placed in the moisture oven for 3 hours. After 3 hours, it
was checked several times until it gives a constant weight and the final constant weight was
measured.
Afterwards 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% solutions were poured into labeled bottles separately. Then
5g of cucumber cubes were added to each jam bottles. Then the solutions in each jam bottles
were tested for conductivity & brix value (TSS) in every 15 minutes for 2 hours.
After the two hours, 5g of cucumber from each jam bottle was measured and they were kept in
the moisture oven for 3 hours. After a constant weight was achieved, the weights of the dry
sample were measured.
Then above steps were carried out adding 1g sugar to brine solutions and 1g Citric acid to brine
solutions. Sugar & brine series/ brine & Citric acid series)
Observation
Moisture content
(5.0125-0.1497)/5.0125100= 97%
96%
97.2%
97%+96%+97.2%/3
96.7%
after 1 day
weight(g)
22.2747
final dried
weight(g)
0.2355
moisture
content%
95.29
3%
5.0677
13.5787
13.322
0.2567
94.93
4%
5%
6%
7%
5.0320
5.0125
5.0538
5.0153
13.0204
50.5934
44.8015
45.8640
12.721
50.2328
44.3953
45.4582
0.2994
0.3606
0.4062
0.4058
94.05
92.80
91.96
91.91
Conductivity
Time(minutes) 2%
solution
0
31.5
15
28.2
30
25.8
45
24.1
60
24.5
75
24.0
90
24.0
105
24.0
120
24.0
3%
solution
44.9
39.7
36.1
33.5
34.2
33.6
33.6
33.6
33.6
Conductivity of(mS/cm)
4%
5%
solution
solution
60.7
72.2
54.8
59.7
49.8
56.8
44.7
53.4
43.9
52.9
44.0
52.3
44.6
52.5
6%
solution
88.0
77.4
74.5
65.2
64.9
65.3
65.0
7%
solution
94.2
71.4
77.7
75.6
70.8
67.9
67.3
Salinity
Time
(minutes)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
2%
solution
21%
19%
15%
20%
16%
15%
10%
3%
solution
29%
24%
21%
23%
18%
17%
18%
Salinity of
4%
5%
solution
solution
39%
43%
29%
31%
28%
33%
29%
34%
24%
28%
23%
30%
25%
30%
6%
solution
48%
35%
33%
45%
40%
37%
37%
7%
solution
50%
39%
40%
43%
38%
40%
41%
conductivity vs time
conductivity(mS/cm)
100
94.2
90 88
80
77.4 77.7
74.5 75.6
70.8
7072.2 71.4
65.3
65.2 64.9 67.9
6060.7 59.7
54.8 56.8 53.4 52.9 52.3
50
49.8
44.9
44.7 43.9 44
40
39.7
36.1 33.5 34.2 33.6
3031.5 28.2
25.8 24.1 24.5 24
20
67.3
65
conductivity of 4% solution
33.6
conductivity of 6% solution
24
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
time(min)
conductivity of 3% solution
52.5
44.6
10
0
conductivity of 2% solution
conductivity of 5% solution
conductivity of 7% solution
initial cucumber
weight
final
weight
dried
weight
moistur
e%
time(min)
2% sample
3% sample
4%
5%
6%
sample
sample
sample
15
30
45
60
25.2
24.2
23.1
23
35.5
32.6
31.8
32.2
39.8
38.7
37.4
37.1
42.2
41.2
40.9
40.4
55.2
51.9
51
50.7
(mS/cm)
5% sample 6% sample
42.2
55.2
41.2
51.9
40.9
51.0
40.4
50.7
40.4
50.7
7% sample
66.3
62.0
61.2
61.3
61.5
Conductivity
Time(min)
15
30
45
60
75
2% sample
25.2
24.2
23.1
23.0
23.0
Conductivity of
3% sample 4% sample
35.5
39.8
32.6
38.7
31.8
37.4
32.2
37.1
32.1
37.4
Salinity
Time(min)
15
30
45
60
75
2% sample
14
15
17
23
17
3% sample
20
22
21
30
24
Salinity of
4% sample 5% sample
23
25
26
25
27
27
34
35
27
29
6% sample
30
33
35
41
36
7% sample
36
40
44
50
45
sample
weight(g)
5.011
5.011
5.016
5.01
5.019
5.001
after 3hrs
weight(g)
62.258
57.155
62.818
50.541
13.672
45.921
dried
weight(g)
0.21
0.231
0.279
0.315
0.369
0.452
Conductivity
Time(min)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
2%
solution
30.7
25
24.8
23.9
24.3
24.2
24.2
Conductivity of
3%
4%
solution
solution
44.0
59.1
35.9
47.5
33.7
45.6
33.6
44.2
33.4
43.2
33.4
43.3
33.4
43.3
2%
solution
22
17
18
24
18
24
23
3%
solution
30
20
22
24
30
29
30
(mS/cm)
5%
6%
solution
solution
70.9
86.6
57.2
69.2
54.3
67.1
53
64.3
52.6
63.9
52.5
63.9
52.5
63.8
7%
solution
111.6
93.7
85.5
82.3
83.3
82.5
82.5
(%)
5%
solution
50
34
34
35
42
42
42
7%
solution
81
52
60
55
63
62
62
Salinity
Time(min)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
Salinity of
4%
solution
43
28
30
30
36
35
35
6%
solution
62
40
41
43
49
49
49
moisture conten
%
95.81
95.39
94.44
93.71
92.65
90.96
Discussion
Principle
Salinity of the solution decrease with time as water leaches out from vegetable. The highest
water lose takes place in a mixture of sucrose- NaCl osmotic solution, NaCl increases the driving
forces from dehydration, lowering water activity and allowing a higher rate of penetration in the
material due to its low molecular weight.
In all osmotic solutions the water loss and solid gain increased with increasing concentration of
salt.
When heating cucumber the cell wall gets damage and water loss becomes high.
Conclusion
Osmotic dehydration causes moisture content, and conductivity in the solution to be decreased.
Osmotic dehydration happens in hypertonic solutions. Above mentioned properties can be
reversed inhypotonic solutions.
Reference questions
What is the principal involved in osmotic dehydration?
Principle of osmosis (movement of water from a low concentrated solution to a high
concentration solution via a semi-permeable membrane) is used. In this method of dehydration
the cut foods in immersed in concentrated solutions of sugars and salts. A flux of water out of the
food and of other solutes into the foodstuff develops due to the difference in osmotic pressure.
The product thus loses some water to the external solution. Rate of removal of water can be
enhanced by increasing the concentration of the osmotic solution or the temperature.
Give examples for osmotically dehydrated foods?
Apples
Guava
Pine apple
Cucumber
Carrot
Orange
Tomato
Papaya
Reference
http://foodpathshala.ning.com/profiles/blogs/osmotic-dehydration , http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612008000300028