Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
An introduction to
Laser Lift-Off (LLO) technology
Cross-Section of VLEDs
Transient-liquid-phase bonding
10
11
12
Laser-induced heating
14
15
Approach to integration
16
Approach to integration
17
18
200 m
GaN LED on Si
GaN on Si by Pd-In bonding and
laser lift-off (LLO)
Pd-In metal bilayers were used as bonding material which formed the
compound PdIn3 after the low-temperature bonding process.
Cleaving the Si substrate was performed to make the cleavage facets on
the GaN.
20
10
21
22
11
23
24
12
25
26
13
27
Sapphire
N-GaN
Ec
E0
E1
E2
E3
Ev
Undoped GaN
AlN
28
14
Laser beam
Sapphire(Al2O3)
Sapphire(Al2O3)
(900C~1000C)
(Eg 9eV)
Buffer
layer
GaN
Ga + N2
n-GaN
n-GaN
Ni
Ni
(Eg=3.4eV)
M.Q.W.
p-GaN
29
Light intensity
Time
Laser medium
KrF
Wavelength
248 nm
380~400 mJ/pulse
2000 mJ/cm2
Full-Width-Half-Magnitude
30 ns
1~100 Hz
35
15
Eg =
1.24
1.24
=
= 5 eV
C
0.248
Sapphire
Sapphire(Al2O3)
400 m
900C~1000C
GaN
Buffer layer
(u-GaN)
Ga + N2
n-GaN
M.Q.W.
p-GaN
Oxidized Ni/Au
& Ti/Al/Ti/Au
80 m
Ni substrate
36
KrF
Laser beam
x
y
10
850-1000 mJ/cm2
Scanning velocity:
500-800 mm/min
Z=0 mm
Pattern LLO ()
5 mm
LLO
Z= -3.74 mm
GaN wafer
16
-
Start
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
Laser beam size
1 mm
2-inch wafer
1 mm
End
: Overlap for neighboring laser pulse
39
-
(overlap)
Sample
X 0.3 mm
y 0.3 mm
0.3 mm
1 mm
40
17
Mask
Patterned
Laser Beam
300300, 230230
360360, 90 90
unit: m2
10001000
unit: m2
42
18
46
47
19
48
49
20
50
53
21
54
57
22
61
62
23
The change in slope for pulse intensities exceeding 350 mJ/cm2 is probably
due to absorption or reflection of the laser light by the metallic Ga layer formed
63
during the process.
The laser treatment was performed at 300 K with an absorbed pulse intensity of
290 mJ/cm2 and a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz. From the slope of the straight
64
line an average etch rate of 330 nm/s can be deduced.
24
The intensities of the two pulses were chosen such as to obtain the same
maximum temperature of 1100 K (sublimation temperature, cf. Fig. 2).
66
25
Because of the much longer pulse duration in the case of the KrF laser, a
higher pulse energy of typically 600 mJ/cm2 is necessary to heat the GaN
above the sublimation threshold, whereas pulse energies of 300 mJ/cm2 are
sufficient in the case of the Nd:YAG laser.
Since optical thermalization and relaxation processes in GaN occur on a much
faster timescale of ps or a few ns, the temperature profiles generated by the
different laser pulses can be calculated quite easily in a one-dimensional
model based on the temporal shape of the laser pulse, the known absorption
coefficients of GaN, and the thermal properties ( heat capacitance and
conductivity) of GaN and sappire.
67
The missing pieces at the wafer border actually had broken off right after the
HVPE growth.
68
26
Experimental results
Image of a HVPE-GaN sample with an area of about 1 cm2 and a thickness of
30 m fixed with epoxy resin to a glass holder after laser lift-off
The delaminated sapphire substrate is shown on the left.
69
27
71
Experimental results
Delaminated 3 m thick 2 GaN film (not structured) wafer-bonded onto GaAs
(left) and the corresponding GaN-free sapphire substrate (right)
The transferred GaN film is essentially defect free, except for some peeledoff areas at the wafer rim.
72
28
29
75
76
30
77
78
31
79
For higher intensities, the absorbed photon energy leads to local heating of
the layer and causes the destruction of the GaN.
Only those devices with median energy densities approximately 800
mJ/cm2 for KrF laser and 200 mJ/cm2 for YAG laser have good yields 90%.
Under a reverse bias of 5 V, the leakage current of YAG-LED was 1.65103
nA, which was 10 000 times higher than that of the KrF-LED 0.17 nA.
These degradations were caused by the laser lift-off processes, which
generated the screw dislocations. The screw dislocation density penetrated
through MQW region of YAG-LED was 2.9109 cm2, which was ten times
higher than that of the KrF-LED 3.75108 cm2.
This is because the absorption coefficient of GaN at 248 nm for KrF-LED is
2105 cm1, which is 3.33 times higher than that at 355 nm for YAG-LED.
80
32
81
82
33
83
84
34
85
35
87
88
36
91
37
92
93
38
94
Thank You!
2007/10/29
96
39