Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ISSUE
WON
Aquinos veto
FACTS
1)
the funds appropriated for the expenditures of the judiciary, including the
of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals who have rendered at least 20
use of any savings from any particular item to cover deficits or shortages
knows its priorities just as it is aware of the fiscal restraints. The Chief
Justice shall receive during the residue of his natural life the salary which
he was receiving at the time of his retirement of resignation.
This was amended by RA 1797 which provided for an automatic
adjustment of the pension rates. The same benefits were handed to the
2)
In the case at bar, the veto of these specific provisions in the General
the Court upheld the authority of the President and other key officials to
3)
4)
fact, been granted. And once given, the heads of the different branches of
5)
bill for the reenactment of the repealed provisions of RA No. 1797 and RA
3595 to ensure that those serving in said institutions adequate old age
pensions even during the time where the purchasing power of the peso
another.
6)
7)
preferential treatment over those of the vast majority of the Civil Service
Servants.
But in 1991, a group of Justices (4) petitioned the Court for a readjustment
PD 644 did not become law as there was no valid publication pursuant to
the ruling in Taada v. Tuvera. Since PD644 has no binding force or effect
8)
9)
savings for augmenting items for the payment of the pension differentials,
Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 1992 certain appropriations for the
Judiciary intended for the payment of the adjusted pension rates due the
10)
retired Justices.
The Executive used her item veto power, claiming that the Courts
resolution had effectively nullified her veto of HB 16297.
DECISION
Commission
provision.
Office
of the
Ombudsman
resources with the wisdom and dispatch that their needs require.
It recognizes the power and authority to levy, assess and collect fees, fix
the
and
for compensation and pay plans of the government and allocate and
Elections,
on
The attempt to use the veto power to set aside a Resolution of this Court
and to deprive retirees of benefits given them by Rep. Act. No. 1797
appropriations.
In the instant case, the vetoed provisions which relate to the use of