Breaking: NASA U-turn Admits Global Warming Bias on Suns

Key Role
principia-scientific.org/breaking-nasa-u-turn-admits-global-warming-bias-on-sun-s-key-role/

10/01/2013
Published on January 9, 2013
Written by
In one of the biggest body blows to climate alarmism comes an astonishing new u-turn from NASA. In essence, the
prestigious American space agency has admitted it has been shackled for decades into toeing a political line over
man-made global warming so as to play down key solar factors.
NASA news logo
The astonishing NASA announcement comes in the wake of a compelling new study just published titled, The
Effects of Solar Variability on Earths Climate. One of the participants, Greg Kopp of the Laboratory for Atmospheric
and Space Physics at the University of Colorado, overturned mainstream climate science thinking by declaring even
slight changes in solar output have a considerable impact on climate. Kopp conceded, Even typical short term
variations of 0.1% in incident irradiance exceed all other energy sources (such as natural radioactivity in Earths
core) combined.
The full report by Dr. Tony Phillips is available from the National Academies Press. The news story reveals NASAs
upper management was barred from stopping climate activist, James Hansen, head of NASAs research on climate,
from promoting a political agenda. The NASA climate retreat signals that a paradigm shift is now in full swing and
the discredited claims of man-made global warming alarmists are being tossed aside at the highest levels of
government.
Popular skeptic climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball was overjoyed at the news, Finally, NASA seem to have broken free of
the settled science that the IPCC imposed. Climate science was effectively frozen for thirty years and NASA are
now getting back to where they were in the 1970s. The last valuable contribution they made was Herman and
Goldbergs, Sun, Weather and Climate, in 1978.
Of great satisfaction to Dr. Ball was the opening third paragraph that conceded:
Understanding the sun-climate connection requires a breadth of expertise in fields such as plasma physics, solar
activity, atmospheric chemistry and fluid dynamics, energetic particle physics, and even terrestrial history. No single
researcher has the full range of knowledge required to solve the problem. To make progress, the NRC had to
assemble dozens of experts from many fields at a single workshop.
For years Dr. Ball has championed the view that climatology is a generalist discipline that requires specialist
feedback from numerous and otherwise disparate fields of science, something a secretive and controversial clique
of researchers refused to accept. As chairman of Principia Scientific International (PSI) Ball has been instrumental in
helping to build a team of almost 200 experts from relevant fields specifically to address facts that the climate
science community was either ill-equipped or unwilling to examine.
Privately, Ball has been kept in the know from influential quarters. He reveals, The information about higher ups
came to me directly from a very reliable and knowledgeable management source when I was at the Heartland
Conference in Washington. We had a long discussion after I signed a copy of the Slayers book for the person.

1/2

Now widely accepted as a key player in these climate wars Dr. Ball has defended high-profile libel suits filed by two
big hitters from the UNs global warming cadre, Dr. Michael Mann and Dr. Andrew Weaver. Ball recalls, It was an
article about this scientific block by IPCC that triggered the first of my current lawsuits. (article link).
Ball believes this latest NASA publication marks the breaking of the control Hansen had over climate research at the
U.S. space agency. The comments of Hansens boss indicate the degree of political power Hansen had as a
bureaucrat, adds Ball. As he has written before, Ball has shown that the evidence is stacking up proving that
Hansen was out of control and what he has been doing publicly and politically probably should have been
censured, even prosecuted under the Hatch Act.
Ball notes, I understand that upper management were advised by much higher authority not to touch Hansen.
When you look at the manipulations used by Senator Wirth for his appearance before Al Gores committee it is not
surprising. This is a reference to Wirths own admission that theatricality was used to unduly influence a key U.S.
committee investigating global warming in the 1980s.
To Ball this article may be a small break through scientifically, but its political implications are profound. Put this with
the revisions at the UK Met Office, and it marks an even greater shift. The question now is: can the mainstream
media be far behind? They will all want to be on the winning side, especially if it affects funding and credibility.
Ironically, Ball believes some of the scientists will have more trouble adjusting. This will particularly apply to those
scientists who also hold the political view of those who hijacked climate science for a political agenda. PSIs most
senior fellow adds:
I think NASA and others who let themselves be bullied must be held accountable. I remember in Winnipeg three
Environment Canada employees telling me after a presentation that they agreed with me but would lose their jobs if
they spoke out. I used to have sympathy for this position not any more. It is precisely this type of coercion that
must be countered at all levels. Why is there need for a whistleblower law in a supposedly open and democratic
society.
Perhaps this incredible change of heart from NASA may even prompt the person(s) who leaked the emails from the
Climatic Research Unit (CRU) to finally reveal themselves.

Related
Tags: james hansen, nasa, solar activity, sun, Tim Ball
Trackback from your site.

2/2