Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
33. 33. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA What you look for in student responses to evaluate
their progress toward meeting the learning target. Dimensions of traits in performance
that are used to illustrate understanding, reasoning, and proficiency. Start with
identifying the most important dimensions of the performance What distinguishes an
adequate to an inadequate demonstration of the target?
34. 34. EXAMPLE OF CRITERIA Learning target: Students will be able to write a
persuasive paper to encourage the reader to accept a specific course of action or point
of view. Criteria: Appropriateness of language for the audience Plausibility and
relevance of supporting arguments. Level of detail presented Evidence of creative,
innovative thinking Clarity of expression Organization of ideas
35. 35. Watch video of Cody Green
36. 36. RATING SCALES Indicate the degree to which a particular dimension is present.
Three kinds: Numerical, qualitative, combined qualitative/quantitative
37. 37. Numerical Scale Numbers of a continuum to indicate different level of
proficiency in terms of frequency or quality Example: No Understanding 1 2 3 4 5
Complete understanding No organization 1 2 3 4 5 Clear organization Emergent reader 1
2 3 4 5 Fluent reader
38. 38. Qualitative scale Uses verbal descriptions to indicate student performance.
Provides a way to check the whether each dimension was evidenced. Type A: Indicate
different gradations of the dimension Type B: Checklist
39. 39. Example of Type A: Minimal, partial, complete Never, seldom, occasionally,
frequently, always Consistent, sporadically, rarely None, some, complete
Novice, intermediate, advance, superior Inadequate, needs improvement, good
excellent Excellent, proficient, needs improvement Absent, developing, adequate,
fully developed Limited, partial, thorough Emerging, developing, achieving Not
there yet, shows growth, proficient Excellent, good, fair, poor
40. 40. Example of Type A: Checklist
41. 41. Holistic scale The category of the scale contains several criteria, yielding a single
score that gives an overall impression or rating Example level 4: Sophisticated
understanding of text indicated with constructed meaning level 3: Solid understanding of
text indicated with some constructed meaning level 2: Partial understanding of text
indicated with tenuous constructed meaning level 1: superficial understanding of text
with little or no constructed meaning
42. 42. EXAMPLE HOLISTIC SCALE
43. 43. Analytic Scale One in which each criterion receives a separate score. Example
Criteria Outstanding 5 4 Competent 3 Marginal 2 1 Creative ideas Logical organization
Relevance of detail Variety in words and sentences Vivid images
44. 44. RUBRICS When scoring criteria are combined with a rating scale, a complete
scoring guideline is produced or rubric. A scoring guide that uses criteria to differentiate
between levels of student proficiency.
45. 45. EXAMPLE OF A RUBRIC
46. 46. GUIDELINES IN CREATING A RUBRIC 1. Be sure the criteria focus on important
aspects of the performance 2. Match the type of rating with the purpose of the assessment
3. The descriptions of the criteria should be directly observable 4. The criteria should be
written so that students, parents, and others understand them. 5. The characteristics and
traits used in the scale should be clearly and specifically defined. 6. Take appropriate
steps to minimize scoring frame
47. 47. PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT: EXPLORATION Have you ever done a portfolio?
Tell me about this experience. Did you enjoy it? What elements did you include in your
portfolio? Are the materials placed in the portfolio required? Watch video on Portfolio
48. 48. WHAT ARE PORTFOLIOS? Purposeful, systematic process of collecting and
evaluating student products to document progress toward the attainment of learning
targets or show evidence that a learning target has been achieved. Includes student
participation in the selection and student self-reflection. A collection of artifacts
accompanied by a reflective narrative that not only helps the learner to understand and
extend learning, but invites the reader of the portfolio to gain insight about learning and
the learner (Porter & Cleland, 1995)
49. 49. CHARACTERISTICS OF PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT Clearly defined purpose
and learning targets Systematic and organized collection of student products
Preestablished guidelines for what will be included Student selection of some works that
will be included Student self-reflection and self-evaluation Progress documented with
specific products and/or evaluations Portfolio conferences between students and
teachers
50. 50. PURPOSE OF PORTFOLIO Showcase portfolio: Selection of best works. Student
chooses work, profile are accomplishments and individual profile emerges.
Documentation portfolio: Like a scrapbook of information and examples. Includes
observations, tests, checklists, and rating scales. Evaluation portfolio: More
standardized. Assess student learning with self-reflection. Examples are selected by
teachers and predetermined.
51. 51. ADVANTAGES OF PORTFOLIO Students are actively involved in self-evaluation
and self-reflection Involves collaborative assessment Ongoing process where students
demonstrate performance, evaluate , revise , and produce quality work. Focus on selfimprovement rather than comparison with others Students become more engaged in
learning because both instruction and assessment shift from teacher controlled to mix of
internal and external control. Products help teachers diagnose learning difficulties
clarify reasons for evaluation Flexible
52. 52. Final Workshop crlmgn@yahoo.com