Sei sulla pagina 1di 75

INTERNATIONAL

COMPARISONOFMAJOR
BLACKOUTSAND
RESTORATION
AEMCReliabilityPanel

Authored by:

Date of issue:
Version:

DGA Consulting
PO Box 1061
Hunters Hill, NSW 2110
AUSTRALIA
5/05/2016
3.0

DocumentControl

CustomerDetails
CustomerName:
CustomerAddress:
ContactPerson:

POReference:

AboutthisDocument
Title:
DateofIssue:
TermsandConditions:
Preparedby:
Approvedby:

RevNo. Date
1.2
13/3/16
1.3
17/3/16
2.0
29/3/16
2.1
30/3/16
2.2
29/4/16

3.0

5/5/16

AEMCReliabilityPanel
Level6,201ElizabethSt
Sydney,NSW2000
JulianEggleston
mailto:julian.eggleston@aemc.gov.au
p:0282967800

Internationalcomparisonofmajorblackoutsand
restoration
05/05/2016
DGAConsultingareengagedunderagreedTerms
andConditionswithAEMC
P.JeffreyPalermo
DonBonnitcha

ReasonforIssue
Firstdraft
Firstdraftrevised
SeconddraftwithTask3
Fig1andrevisedtext
Addeddiscussionofinertiaand
faultcurrent,andminor
corrections
Clarificationsandcorrecttypos

Updatedby
PJP
PJP
PJP
PJP
PJP

Verifiedby
DB
DB
DB
DB
DB

PJP

DB

PO Box 1061 Hunters Hill, NSW 2110 Tel: +61 2 8005 7471
DGA Consulting Pty Limited ABN 22 600 478 859
www.dga-consulting.com.au

Contents
Projectoverview...................................................................................................................................1
UtilityandregulatorystructureintheAustralianNEM..............................................................1
Developmentsin2015regardingSRASandblackstart................................................................1
Task1Internationalcomparisonofmajorblackouts...................................................................3
Contextforcomparison...................................................................................................................3
Internationalcomparison.................................................................................................................4
Summary............................................................................................................................................8
2003EasternUS.................................................................................................................................8
Thesituationbeforetheblackout..............................................................................................10
Theblackout.................................................................................................................................11
Restoration....................................................................................................................................16
Lessonslearned............................................................................................................................22
2013Sarawak...................................................................................................................................23
Thesituationbeforetheblackout..............................................................................................23
Theblackout.................................................................................................................................24
Restoration....................................................................................................................................25
Lessonslearned............................................................................................................................26
2008Oahu,Hawaii.........................................................................................................................26
Thesituationbeforetheblackout..............................................................................................27
Theblackout.................................................................................................................................28
Restoration....................................................................................................................................28
Lessonslearned............................................................................................................................29
2003Italy..........................................................................................................................................30
Thesituationbeforetheblackout..............................................................................................30
Theblackout.................................................................................................................................31
Restoration....................................................................................................................................33
Lessonslearned............................................................................................................................40
2011SanDiego,US.........................................................................................................................41
PO Box 1061 Hunters Hill, NSW 2110 Tel: +61 2 8005 7471
DGA Consulting Pty Limited ABN 22 600 478 859
www.dga-consulting.com.au

DGAConsulting

Thesituationbeforetheblackout..............................................................................................41
Theblackout.................................................................................................................................42
Restoration....................................................................................................................................45
Lessonslearned............................................................................................................................46
Task2Internationalcomparisonofregulatoryarrangementstopreventormitigate
blackoutsincludingrestoration..................................................................................................47
Contextforcomparison.................................................................................................................47
PJM,US............................................................................................................................................50
Specificsystemrestorationvariables........................................................................................51
Underlyingsystemconditionassumptions.............................................................................52
SouthAfrica.....................................................................................................................................53
Italy...................................................................................................................................................53
ERCOT,US......................................................................................................................................54
Ireland..............................................................................................................................................56
Restoringpriorityloads..............................................................................................................56
Underlyingsystemconditionassumptions.............................................................................56
Task3Changesanticipatedforblackstartplanninginsystemswithveryhighlevelsof
renewablegeneration...................................................................................................................57
Natureofrenewablegenerationaffectingblackoutsandblackstart.....................................57
Impactonblackouts.......................................................................................................................58
Systeminertia...............................................................................................................................58
Ramprates(rateofchangeoffrequency)................................................................................59
Underfrequencyandundervoltageresponse.......................................................................60
Coincidentfrequencyreaction...................................................................................................61
Overvoltages...............................................................................................................................61
Restartcapability.........................................................................................................................62
Impactonrestoration.....................................................................................................................62
Possiblemitigationmeasures........................................................................................................63
Conventionalgeneration............................................................................................................63

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page ii

DGAConsulting

Increasedinertiaandfaultcurrents..........................................................................................63
UVLSandUFLSsystems................................................................................................................63

Invertercapabilityanddesign...................................................................................................64
SouthAustraliainterconnections..............................................................................................64
Energystorage.............................................................................................................................65
Conclusions.........................................................................................................................................67
Generalconclusionsregardingmajorblackouts........................................................................67
Generalconclusionsregardingblackstartrequirements.........................................................68
SpecificcommentsfortheAEMCandNEMsituation:.................................................................68

Figures
Figure1:ThreestagesofrestorationusedbyNEM.........................................................................4
Figure2:ReliabilityCoordinatorsintheaffectedarea................................................................10
Figure3:Situationat16:10:27emphasizingseparationborder..................................................13
Figure4:Situationat16:10:45emphasizingseparationborder..................................................14
Figure5:Situationat16:13showingthefinalseparatedarea....................................................14
Figure6:Theareathatwasultimatelyblackedout.....................................................................15
Figure7:Regionalloadandgenerationjustbeforeblackout.....................................................24
Figure8:Oahugeneration...............................................................................................................27
Figure9:Oahurestorationtimeline................................................................................................29
Figure10:SeparationsequenceofItalianinterconnections........................................................32
Figure11:Italyrestorationtimeline...............................................................................................34
Figure12:ItalyattheendofStage1restoration..........................................................................36
Figure13:ItalyattheendofStage2restoration..........................................................................38
Figure14:ItalyattheendofStage3restoration..........................................................................39
Figure15:SanDiegoareamapofevent........................................................................................42
Figure16:ThesouthernCaliforniasituationat15:28..................................................................43
Figure17:ThesouthernCaliforniasituationat15:32..................................................................44
Figure18:PJMs21transmissionzones..........................................................................................51
Figure19:ERCOTareaofTexas........................................................................................................55

Tables
Table1:Internationalcomparisonofmajorsupplydisruptions..................................................5
AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page iii

DGAConsulting

Table2:SummaryofHECOgeneration..........................................................................................28
Table3:Italianimportsat03:0028September2003.....................................................................31
Table4:SanDiegoCountypreeventsupplyanddemand........................................................42
Table5:SanDiegoblackoutstatistics.............................................................................................45
Table6:SanDiegoarealoadrestorationtimes.............................................................................46
Table7:SanDiegoareagenerationrestorationtimes..................................................................46
Table8:Internationalcomparisonofregulatoryarrangementstopreventorameliorate
blackouts................................................................................................................................48

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page iv

DGAConsulting

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Utility and regulatory structure in the Australian NEM
TheAustralianEnergyMarketCommission(AEMC)andtheReliabilityPanelarepartofthe
utilityregulatorystructureoftheAustralianNationalElectricityMarket(NEM).TheNEMis
awholesalemarketforsupplyingelectricitytoretailersandendusersinQueensland,New
SouthWales,theAustralianCapitalTerritory,Victoria,SouthAustraliaandTasmania.
Operationsarebasedinfiveinterconnectedregionsthatlargelyfollowstateboundaries.
TheAEMCoperateswithinabroadermarketgovernancestructurealongsidetheAustralian
EnergyMarketOperator(AEMO)andtheAustralianEnergyRegulator(AER).TheAEMC
determinesthepolicyenvironmentandgovernancestructuresthatshapeAustralias
developingenergymarketsandsetstheoperatingrequirementsandobligationsofmarket
participants.TheAEMOmanagestheNEMandgasmarkets.
AmongtheservicestheAEMOmanagesisSystemRestartAncillaryServices(SRAS).The
objectiveofSRASistoprovidereasonableassurancethatthesystemcanberestarted
followingaregionalblackout.TheAEMOistoprocuretheleastcostcombinationofSRAS
submissionsthatmeettheSystemRestartStandard(SRS).
TheSRSisdeterminedbytheReliabilityPaneltomeettherequirementsoftheNational
ElectricityRules(NER).Specifically,theSRSidentifiesthemaximumamountoftimethat
SRASareallowedenergizeaspecifiedgenerationleveltarget.TheSRSalsoidentifiesa

numberofotherparameters,includingthestrategic,geographic,technologyandfuel
diversityofSRAS,aswellastheprinciplesthatAEMOmustconsiderwhendevelopingthe
boundariesofelectricalsubnetworks.

Developments in 2015 regarding SRAS and black start


InApril2015theAEMCpublishedafinalrulechangethatamendedsomeofthe
arrangementsinrelationtotheprocurementofSRAS.On30June2015,theAEMCprovided
TermsofReferencetotheReliabilityPaneltoinitiateareviewoftheSRS.Amongother
things,thisrequiredthePaneltoundertakeareviewoftheSRStomeettherequirements
revisedinJuly2015followingafinalruledeterminationmadebytheAEMC.ThePanelis
requiredtocompleteitsReviewoftheStandardbyDecember2016.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 1 of 69

DGAConsulting

Aspartofitsresponse,theAEMCreleasedanIssuesPaperinNovember2015describingthe
issuesassociatedwithSRAS.Variousstakeholderssubmittedresponsestothisissuepaperin
December.
On29January2016theAEMCissuedarequestforproposals(RFP)asoneelementinthe
AEMCsandReliabilityPanelsresponsetotheserequirements.TheRFPsoliciteda

consultanttoprovideaninternationalcomparisonofmajorsupplydisruptionsinelectricity
systemsandregulatoryarrangementsforpowersystemrestoration.1TheRFPrequestedan
internationalcomparisonofeventswherethepowersystemhascollapsedtoablacksystem
conditioncommonlycalledablackout.2
TheAEMCselectedDGAConsultingPty.Limited(DGA)toperformthiswork.
TheAEMCsoughtaswideareviewaspossibleofdifferentrelevantinternationaleventsand
regulatoryarrangements.TheAEMCrequestedtwomainpartsofthework:
1. Aninternationalcomparisonofmajorblackouts;and
2. Aninternationalreviewofregulatoryarrangementstopreventor
mitigatesuchoutagesincludingrestoration.
ThisreportaddressesthesetwomainpartsinTasks1and2,below.
TheAEMCalsoelectedtohaveDGAperformanadditionaltaskproposedbyDGAtodescribe
blackstartplansintwoislandedsystems(IrelandandHawaii)wherelargeamountsof
intermittentgeneration(windandsolar)arebeinginstalled.Initialinquiriesrevealedthat
suchplanninginthosejurisdictionswasnotwelladvancedandthechapterwasadjustedto
explorethechallengesintroducedby,andpotentialmitigationapproachesfor,significant
levelsofintermittentgeneration.

1. AmajorsupplydisruptionisasdefinedinChapter10oftheNERtheunplannedabsenceofvoltageona
partofthetransmissionsystemaffectingoneormorepowerstationsandwhichleadstoalossofsupplyto
oneormoreloads.
2. BlacksystemisdefinedinChapter10oftheNERtheabsenceofvoltageonallorasignificantpartofthe
transmissionsystemorwithinaregionduringamajorsupplydisruptionaffectingasignificantnumberof
customerselectricitysupplydisruptionevent.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 2 of 69

DGAConsulting

TASK 1INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF MAJOR


BLACKOUTS
Theprocessandexperienceofrestoringthesystemafterablackoutisanimportantelement
oftherequiredwork.Whilethereareusuallypublishedreportsandotherinformation
regardingthecausesofspecificblackouts,thereisusuallylittlepublishedinformationabout
restoration.Inthereport,wehaverelied,inpart,oninformationprovidedinformallyby
variousutilityexpertsintheaffectedjurisdictions.

Context for comparison


TheAEMCisinterestedincomparinginternationalpracticesrelatedtoblackoutsandblack
startgeneration.SomeoftheissuesthattheAEMCisinterestedincomparingincludethe
causesoftheblackouts,howwellblackstartunitsperformed,thetimingofrestoration
steps,howinterconnectionswereusedinrestoration,howquicklyservicewasrestored,and
problemsthatoccurredduringrestoration.
Regardingtimingofrestoration,thecommonunderstandingintheNEMisathreestage
processasdepictedinFigure1.

Stage1theAEMOinitiallyassesseseventsandsystemconditions.Thefocus
isonrestoringgenerationandtransmissionnetworkstosupplyauxiliariesof
generatingunitsfromSRASbyenergizingalimitedtransmissionnetwork.
DistributionNetworkSystemProviders(DNSPs)reconnectloadasdirectedby
TransmissionSystemNetworkProviders(TNSPs)andtheAEMOtostabilize
thesystem.(Restorationmayincludelimitedsupplytosensitiveloadswhere
practical).

Stage2themajorityofthetransmissionnetworkisenergizedand
available/requiredgeneratingunitsarestarted.Thefocusisonrestoringthe
transmissionnetworkandrampingupgeneration.DNSPsprogressively
reconnectloadunderdirectionfromTNSPs,mainlytostabilizethesystem,
givingprioritytosensitiveloadswherepractical.

Stage3thedistributionnetworksenergizeanddistributedgeneration
progressivelyrestarts.Remainingdistributionloadsareprogressively
restored.TheendofStage3restoresnormaloperation.(Anynetwork
damageorrepairsrequiredmaydelayrestorationofsomeloads.)

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 3 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 1: Three stages of restoration used by NEM

Figure1showstheobjectofthepresentSRSistorestoregenerationsuchthat40%ofthe
demandcouldbesuppliedwithin4hours.

International comparison
ThischapterdescribesfivemajorinternationalblackoutsasrequestedintheAEMCsRFP.
Fortunately,majorblackoutsareinfrequent,however,thismeansthereareonlyalimitedset
ofeventstochoosefrom.TheseblackoutswereselectedinconsultationwiththeAEMCfrom
alistofsuggestionsbyDGA.Thefiveselectedwere:

2003EasternUSA;

2013Sarawak,Malaysia;

2008Oahu,Hawaii;

2003Italy;and

2011SanDiego,California.

TheAEMCincludedspecificitemstodescribeeachblackoutintheirRFP.Eachoftheseis
summarizedinTable1,below.Inaddition,reportsectionsbelowdescribetheseeventsin
greaterdetail.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 4 of 69

DGAConsulting

Table 1: International comparison of major supply disruptions


Event
Characteristic

2003 Eastern US

2013 Sarawak

2008 Oahu, Hawaii

2003 Italy

2011 San Diego

General description

Major regional outage


(see page 8)

Total system outage


(see page 23)

Total island outage


(see page 26)

National outage
(see page 30)

Regional blackout
(see page 41)

NEM Stage 1

6 hours*

3 hours

5 hours

3 hours

N.A.

NEM Stage 2

10 hours

4 hours

9 hours

4 hours

4-6 hours*

NEM Stage 3

2 days for most


4 days for a few

8 hours

96% in 18 hours

99% in 15 hours

12 hours

Less than 30 minutes


for hydro and pumped
hydro

30 minutes

Less than 30 minutes

30 minutes

Only interconnections
were used

The physical extent of the event (capacity


or lost energy, etc.)

61,800 MW

1,600 MW

1,000 MW

35,000 MW

8,000 MW

Human errors, if any, that triggered or


helped propagate the event

Situation awareness

Switching error

None

Situation awareness

None

Protection equipment failures, if any, that


triggered or helped propagate the event

Software in EMS

Errors at Bakun dam

None

Multiple

None

The contribution of specific load or


generation types to the triggering of, or
restoring power following the event

None

None

None

None

None

Any unusual power system frequency,


voltage or stability issues that contributed to
the triggering or propagation of the event

Northern Ohio had


barely enough
reactive reserves

Synchronizing 100 km
275 kV lines at Bakun

Loss of generation
saw frequency fall
47 Hz (60 Hz normal)

Frequency dropped to
47 Hz when interconnections tripped

None

Time from the initial


system collapse to
restoring normal
operations

Time for restart services to come online to


begin system restoration

Page 5 of 75

* Estimated
The blackout was so extensive that some parts of the transmission system took longer to restore.
The Italian peninsula is very long, so the times are for the main northern portion of system.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 5 of 69

DGAConsulting

Event

Characteristic

2003 Eastern US

2013 Sarawak

2008 Oahu, Hawaii

2003 Italy

2011 San Diego

Any natural phenomena that contributed to


the cause and impact of the major supply
disruption event, such as weather or
seismic conditions

None

None

Lightning storm

None

None

The readiness of generation and supply


equipment and the linkages with restoration
time

Some non-black-start
generation had
problems

Normal

Normal

Normal, but only 8 of


31 TTHL units operated

Normal

The readiness of network assets and the


linkages to restoration time

Mostly normal, with


some damage in this
extensive blackout

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Any equipment damage and the extent to


which this affected the restoration

None

None

A critical 138
kV line
Page 6 of 75
had physical damage

None

None

The extent to which power system topology


contributed to the propagation or
containment of the event, and the
subsequent restoration of the power system

Natural break points


limited propagation

The 100 km 275 kV


line to Bakun were a
problem restoring

None

Italy is very long


peninsula, it was hard
to energize Sicily

There are only two


major transmission
paths

Whether designated restart services were


the only source of restoration, or whether
supply from neighboring power systems
was utilized to assist in the restoration
process

Interconnections were
an important part of
restoration

No interconnections

No interconnections

Interconnections were
critical in restoration

The system was reenergized solely from


the interconnections
no black-start was
used

Did the system restart plan operate as


expected, in relation to timeframes and the
energizing process?

There were problems


across the areas
blacked out

Yes, except for


switching problems at
Bakun

Several failed restarts


between hours 3 to 5

Yes

Yes, but there was a


30-minute discussion
between TOs about
transmission during
re-energizing

Also, some pockets


remained with power

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 6 of 69

DGAConsulting

Event

Characteristic

2003 Eastern US

2013 Sarawak

2008 Oahu, Hawaii

2003 Italy

2011 San Diego

Any particular element of the restart


process that presented specific hurdles in
system restoration (resources, generation,
transmission, distribution, load switching,
etc.)

The widespread
nature made situation
awareness a
challenge

Switching errors at
Bakun substation

None

Controlling voltages

None

The economic cost of the event, such as


value of lost load or impacts on gross
domestic/national product

6 to 10 billion USD

150 million USD

120 million USD

Any social impact attributable to the event

There was major


economic and social
disruption

Chaos during rush


hour in Kuching, the
capital

International
embarrassment

Occurred in early in
morning during
holiday festivities

Occurred in early
afternoon just before
rush hour

The cost of the restart services called upon


to restore the system following the event

None

None

None

None

None

Any key lessons learned or recommendations arising from investigations of the


event undertaken by affected parties or
third, parties including whether the event
was caused by an expected or unexpected
sequence of events

See text beginning at


page 22

Keep personnel
current with black-start
training

Nothing special

Coordinate UFLS
generation trip
settings

Nothing special

Page 7 of 75

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 7 of 69

DGAConsulting

Summary
SomeofthehighlightsfromTable1arebrieflydiscussedherewithadditionaldetails
providedinthesectionsbelow.
Foreachoftheoutagesstudied,therestorationtimescomparabletoNEMstage1were36
hoursandroughlyconsistentwiththeSRS.Mostgenerationwasenergized(NEMstage2)in
46hours.Thenotableexceptionisthe2003USblackout.And,allcustomerloadwas
restored(NEMstage3)in1216hours,againwiththeUSexception.
Thesocialimpactvariedsomewhatamongtheblackouts.Hawaiiwasembarrassedbecause
PresidentObamaandhisfamilyweretherealongwiththeinternationalpresscorps.The
USblackoutaffectedalargeportionofthecountryforseveraldaysandhadamajor
economicimpact.Incontrast,theItalianblackoutoccurredduringtheeveningofanational
holidaywheneconomicactivitywaslowwithshopsandbusinessesclosedfortheday.
TheestimatedcostoftheblackoutsrangedfromUSD610billionto120million.The
approximateUSDcostperMWhwere7,500(US2003),2,500(SanDiego),and900(Italy2003).
Blackstartgeneratorsperformedasexpectedbyenergizinginabout30minutes.Thetrip
tohouseloadgeneration(TTHL)inItalyperformedpoorlywithonly8of31unitsstarting.
(TheItaliansystemoperatorhassinceinstitutedarigoroustestingregimefortheseunits.)
Allthesystemoperatorsusedtheirinterconnectionsveryearlyinrestoringtheirsystems,
andSanDiegorestartedwithoutactivatinganyofitsblackstartresources.
Allthesystemshadsomeelectricalislandsremaininservicethroughouttheblackout.And,
inallcasesexceptHawaii,thetransmissionsystemwasintactfollowingtheinitialevent.

2003 Eastern US
At16:10on14August2003oneoftheworldsworstblackoutsoccurredintheeasternUS.
Theoutageaffectedanestimated50millionpeopleand61,800megawatts(MW)ofelectric
loadinthestatesofOhio,Michigan,Pennsylvania,NewYork,Vermont,Massachusetts,
Connecticut,NewJerseyandtheCanadianprovinceofOntario.Powerwasnotrestoredfor
4daysinsomepartsoftheUnitedStates.PartsofOntariosufferedrollingblackoutsfor
morethanaweekbeforepowerwasfullyrestored.EstimatesoftotalcostsintheUnited

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 8 of 69

DGAConsulting

Statesrangebetween$4billionand$10billion(USD).3InCanada,thenationalgross
domesticproductwasdown0.7%inAugust,therewasanetlossof18.9millionworkhours
andmanufacturingshipmentsinOntarioweredown$2.3billion(CDN).4
ThecascadingblackoutbeganinOhio,spreadeastward,andcausedsuchwidespread
outagesforthreeprincipalreasons:
1. Thelossofakey345kVlineinOhio,followingthelossofothertransmission
linesandweakvoltageswithinOhiothattriggeredmanysubsequentline
trips.
2. Manyofthekeylineswhichtrippedbetween16:05and16:10,operatedon
zone3impedancerelays(orzone2settooperatelikezone3)thatresponded
tooverloadsratherthantruefaultsonthegrid.5Thespeedatwhichthey
trippedspreadthereachandacceleratedthespreadofthecascadebeyond
thenorthernOhioarea.
3. Relayprotectionsettingsforthetransmissionlines,generatorsandunder
frequencyloadsheddinginthenortheastUSwerenotentirelyappropriate
andwerecertainlynotcoordinatedandintegratedtoreducethelikelihood
andconsequencesofacascade.
ComparedwithotherblackoutsnewcausalfeaturesoftheAugust14blackoutinclude:
inadequateinterregionalvisibilityoverthepowersystem;dysfunctionofacontrolareas
SCADA/EMSsystem;andlackofadequatebackupcapabilitytothatsystem.

Thisblackoutalsooccurredbeforevariousregionalcontrolandmonitoringsystemswere
fullyoperationalattheMidwestIndependentSystemOperator(MISO).

3.

ICFConsultingICF(aUSconsultingfirm)estimatedthecoststobebetween$6.8and$10.3billion,The
EconomicCostoftheBlackout,AnissuepaperontheNortheasternBlackout,August14,2003,undated.
AndersonEconomicsGroupestimated$4.5to$8.3billion,PreliminaryEstimate:EconomicImpactofa1to3day
BlackoutInNortheastU.S.,August2003,undated

4. StatisticsCanada,GrossDomesticProductbyIndustry,August2003,CatalogueNo.15001;September2003
LabourForceSurvey;MonthlySurveyofManufacturing,August2003,CatalogueNo.31001.
5. Relaysarecommonlysetforzones.Zone1monitorstheimmediateequipmentandwilloperatequickly
usuallyinafewcycles.Zone2relaysmonitorfarther,usuallyasabackupforrelaysatheotherendofthe
line,theyoperatemoreslowlythanzone1.Zone3monitorsevenfartherandoperatesmoreslowlythan
zone2,thisarethelasthopetointerruptafaultifbothzones1and2fail.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 9 of 69

DGAConsulting

The situation before the blackout


ThegeneralareaaffectedbytheAugust2003blackoutisshowninFigure2.TheReliability
CoordinatorsinvolvedweretheMISO,theOntarioIndependentMarketOperator(IMO),the
NewYorkIndependentSystemOperator(NYISO),andthePJMInterconnection(PJM).
ReliabilityCoordinatorsprovidereliabilityoversightoverawideregion,theyprepare
reliabilityassessments,provideawideareaviewofreliability,andcoordinateemergency
operationsinrealtimeforoneormorecontrolareas.Theymayoperate,butdonot
participatein,wholesaleorretailmarketfunctions.

Figure 2: Reliability Coordinators in the affected area

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 10 of 69

DGAConsulting

Thegeneralconditionsontheregionalsystemswerefairlynormalforasummerday:6

Loadswerehigh,butbelowpeaksummerconditionsabout90%ofprevious
peakloads;

Interregionaltransferswerehigh,butwiththenormalrange;

Voltageswerewithinacceptablelimits,withoperatorsactingtoboost
voltagesasisnormalduringasummerafternoon;

Frequencywastypicalforasummerafternoon;

Allsystemelementswerewithinnormalandcontingencylimits;and

Temperatureswerewarm,butgenerallyabout5CbelowAugusthigh
temperatures.

Therewereahandfulofgeneratorsonplannedmaintenance,however,inaregionalsystem
withanexpectedloadofabout300,000MW,thisisnormal.

The blackout
Therewerefourstagesoftheblackoutsinitiatingsequence:
1. Anormalafternoondegrades;
2. ThenorthernOhiosystemoperatorscomputerfailures;
3. ThreeOhio345kVtransmissionlinefailuresandmanyphonecalls;and
4. ThecollapseofthenorthernOhio138kVsystemandthelossofakey345kV
line.
Beginningat12:15,inaccurateinputdatarenderedMISOsstateestimator(asystem
monitoringtool)ineffective.About13:30a612MWgenerationunitinnorthernOhiotripped
(Eastlake5)andshutdownautomatically.7Losingthisunitdidnotputthegridintoan
unreliablestate,however.

6. MuchofthissectionofthisreportisbasedonU.S.CanadaPowerSystemOutageTaskForce,FinalReporton
theAugust14,2003BlackoutintheUnitedStatesandCanada:CausesandRecommendations,5April2004.
7. Eastlake5trippedofflineastheoperatorsoughttoincreasetheunitsreactivepoweroutput,theunits
protectionsystemdetectedthatvaroutputexceededtheunitsvarcapabilityandtrippedtheunitoffline.
ThelossoftheEastlake5unitdidnotputthegridintoanunreliablestatei.e.,thesystemwasstillableto
safelywithstandanothercontingency.However,losingtheunitrequirednorthernOhiotoimport
additionalpowertomakeupforthelossoftheunitsoutput(612MW),madevoltagemanagementin
northernOhiomorechallenging,andgavesystemoperatorslessflexibilityinoperatingtheirsystem.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 11 of 69

DGAConsulting

The initial events


Shortlyafter14:14,thealarmandloggingsysteminthenorthernOhiosystemoperators
controlroomfailedandwasnotrestoreduntilaftertheblackout.After15:05,some345kV
transmissionlinesincentralOhiobegantrippingoutbecausethelineswerecontacting
overgrowntreeswithinthelinesrightofwayareas.
About15:46whenthelocalsystemoperatorandMISOandneighboringutilitieshadbegunto
realizethatthenorthernOhiosystemwasinjeopardy,theonlywaythattheblackoutmight
havebeenavertedwouldhavebeentodropatleast1,500MWofloadaroundClevelandand
Akron.Nosucheffortwasmade,however,andby15:46itmayalreadyhavebeentoolate
foralargeloadshedtomakeanydifference.
Northern Ohio separates
After15:46,losingsomekey345kVlinesinnorthernOhiocausedtheunderlyingnetworkof
138kVlinestooverloadandtrip,leadinginturntothelossofacritical345kVlineat
16:06theeventthattriggeredtheinitialuncontrollable345kVcascadeportionofthe
blackoutsequence.Thelossofthis345kVlineshutdownthe345kVpathintonorthern
OhiofromeasternOhio.AlthoughtheareaaroundAkron(northwestOhio)wasalready
blackedoutduetoearlierevents,mostofnorthernOhioremainedinterconnected.Theloss
ofthisheavilyoverloadedkey345kVlineinstantlycreatedmajorandunsustainableloading
onlinesinadjacentareas,andthecascadespreadrapidlyaslinesandgeneratingunits
automaticallytrippedbyprotectiverelayactiontoavoidphysicaldamage.
Thesituationat16:10:27isshowninFigure3withOhiointhecenter,MichiganandOntario
tothenorth,andPennsylvaniaandNewYorktotheeast.8Theheavylineshowsthe
interfacewherelineshavetripped.Ascanbeseen,northernandsouthernOhioareno
longerinterconnected.

8. Figure3,Figure4,Figure5andFigure6aretakenfromtheFinalReportontheAugust14,2003Blackoutinthe
UnitedStatesandCanada:CausesandRecommendations,5April2004

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 12 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 3: Situation at 16:10:27 emphasizing separation border

The separations rapidly spread


Duringthenext18secondsnumerousautomaticprotectiondevicesoperated.Thesituation
at16:10:45(Figure4)showshowtheseparationareaexpandedtoincludenorthernOhio,
southeasternMichigan,Ontario,andNewYork.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 13 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 4: Situation at 16:10:45 emphasizing separation border

LessthanthreeminuteslatertheblackoutwascompleteasshowninFigure5.

Figure 5: Situation at 16:13 showing the final separated area

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 14 of 69

DGAConsulting

Thecascadebecamearacebetweenthepowersurgesandtherelays.Thelinesthattripped
firstweregenerallythelongerlineswithrelaysettingsusinglongerapparentimpedance
trippingzonesandnormaltimesettings.LinesinPennsylvania,thatarenothighly
integratedintotheelectricalnetwork,trippedquicklyandsplitthegridbetweenthesections
thatblackedoutandthosethatrecoveredwithoutfurtherpropagatingthecascade.
Thevastmajorityoftripoperationsonlinesalongtheblackoutboundariesbetween
PennsylvaniaandNewYork(forinstance)showedhighspeedrelaytargetsthatindicate
thatamassivepowersurgecausedeachlinetotrip.Totherelays,thispowersurgealtered
thevoltagesandcurrentsenoughthattheyappearedtobefaults.Thepowersurgewas
causedbypowerflowingtothoseareasthatweregenerationdeficient(northernOhioand
southeasternMichigan)orreboundingback.Theseflowsoccurredpurelybecauseofthe
physicsofpowerflowspowerflowsfromareaswithexcessgenerationflowingintoareas
thataregenerationdeficient.
Figure6showstheareaaffectedbytheblackout.PortionsofOhio,Michigan,Ontarioand
NewYorklostpower.

Figure 6: The area that was ultimately blacked-out

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 15 of 69

DGAConsulting

Restoration
Asmightbeexpected,therewasacertainamountofchaosfollowingsuchahugeblackout.
Oncetheextentoftheareawasrecognized,restorationproceededinareasonablyorderly
way.Withsuchalargeaffectedareaandsomuchequipmentinvolved,however,therewere
numeroussetbacksandequipmentmisopertion,usuallyrelatedtohighvoltageswhen
transmissioncircuitswereenergizedbeforetherewaseithersufficientloadorgeneration
connected.
Itshouldbenotedthatthereweresmallpocketsofthesystemwithintheaffectedareathat
remainedwithpower.Thesewereareaswheretransmissiontrippingandotheractionsleft
themwithgenerationandloadinapproximatebalance.
Bythefirstevening(August14),powerhadbeenrestoredto:

Albany,NewYork,anditssurroundings;

NewLondonCounty,Connecticut;

ParrySound,Ontario

ManyareasoftheNiagaraRegioninOntario;

AreasofOntarionearNiagaraFalls(suppliedfromthecityofNiagaraFalls,
Ontario,whichneverlostpower);

PartsofSouthwesternOntario,particularlyareasneartheBruceNuclear
PowerPlant,lostpowerforonly48hours;

PartsofdowntownToronto,Mississauga,London,Ontario,Cornwalland
Pembroke;

PortionsofwesternOttawaincludingKanataandsouthtoKingston;

ThreequartersofthemillionsofcustomerswhohadlostpowerinNew
Jersey;and

PartsofPennsylvania,Ohio,Michigan,andLongIsland.

ThatnightsomeareasofManhattanregainedpoweratapproximately05:00(August15),the
NewYorkCityboroughofStatenIslandregainedpoweraround03:00onAugust15,and
theNiagaraFallsareaat08:00.
ByearlyeveningofAugust15,twoairports,ClevelandHopkinsInternationalAirportand
TorontoPearsonInternationalAirport,werebackinservice.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 16 of 69

DGAConsulting

HalfoftheaffectedpartofOntariohadpowerbythemorningofAugust15,thoughevenin
areaswhereithadcomebackonline,someserviceswerestilldisruptedorrunningatlower
levels.Thelastareastoregainpowerwereusuallysufferingfromtroubleatlocalelectrical
substationsnotdirectlyrelatedtotheblackoutitself.
ByAugust16,powerwasfullyrestoredinNewYorkandToronto.Torontossubwayand
streetcars(trams)remainedoutofserviceuntilAugust18topreventthepossibilityof
equipmentbeingstuckinawkwardlocationsifthepowerwasinterruptedagain.Powerhad
beenmostlyrestoredinOttawa,thoughauthoritieswarnedofpossibleadditional
disruptionsandadvisedconservationwhilerestoringpowercontinuedforotherareas.
Ontarianswereaskedtoreducetheirelectricityuseby50%untilallgeneratingstations
couldbebroughtbackonline.Fourgeneratingstationsremainedoutofserviceonthe19th.
Illuminatedbillboardswerelargelydormantfortheweekfollowingtheblackout,andmany
storeshadonlyaportionoftheirlightson.
New York
TheNYISORestorationPlanreliesonblackstartfacilitiesatthreelocationsinthestateto
energizethebasicminimumpowersystem.9Twooftheselocations,theNiagaraandSt.
Lawrencehydrogenerationfacilities,remainedinservicefollowingtheevent.
At16:27,theNYISOinstructedNewYorkutilitiestobeginblackstartprocedures.Oneof
them(NYPA)beganblackstartproceduresatakeypumpedstoragegeneratorbystripping
thenorthandsouth345kVbuses.Theseprocedureshadbeenthoroughlyreviewedin
simulateddrillsasrecentlyasJune.Implementingthemprovidedamorecertainsetof
initialconditionsfromwhichtobeginrestorationofcritical345kVfacilities,whichhadbeen
lostalongtheHudsonValley.Theonlycomplicationencounteredduringthissequencewas
aninabilitytosynchthetwoblackstartunitsontoa345kVline.Thislinecouldnotbe
closedattheplantduetothelargevoltagedisparitybetweentheplantbusandthe345kV
bus.Systemvoltageswerefurtherstabilizedwhenanother345kVlinewasrestoredat
19:05.Subsequently,alltheconnected345kVlineswererestoredinthenext15minutes.
OneoftheNYISOsfirstobjectiveswastoresynchronizetheNewYorktransmissionsystem
withthePJM500kVinterconnectioninPennsylvania,torestorenormalfrequencycontrolto

9. ThisNewYorksectionisbasedonmaterialintheNYISOsFinalReport:OntheAugust14,2003Blackout,
February2005.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 17 of 69

DGAConsulting

theWesternNewYorkIsland.Initialsynchronizationoccurredat18:52whentheNYISOwas
abletocoordinatethebalanceofgenerationandloadlevelsattherequiredfrequencyforthe
synccheckrelaytooperateandparallelthetwosystems.
TheNYISOalsodirectedConEdison(NewYorkCity)personneltomanuallycloseintothe
PJM500kVgridviasynchroscopeoperationat19:06.UltimatelyasecondNewJerseytie

wasrestoredat19:08providingamoresecureinterconnectionwiththePJM500kVand
345kVtransmissionsystems.Followingtheseevents,thefrequencycontrolintheWestern
NewYorkIslandreturnedtonearnormal.
InpreparingtosynchronizewithISONE,voltageswerestabilizedintheeasternareaofNew
York.AftersuccessfullyreclosingwithPJM,systemfrequencyinNewYorkstabilized.The
effortwasthentostrengthentheNewYorksystemtoprovidemorestablevoltagestotie
intoISONE.ThiswasaccomplishedwhilerestoringlinesintotheConEdisonarea.
TheNYISOandISONEoperatorscoordinatedtherequiredactionswiththeirassociatedTOs.
ISONEusedapumpedstoragehydrofacilityneartheNewYorkbordertosynchronize

usingasynchroscope.Theconnectionwasmadeat01:53onAugust15th.
Throughoutthisevent,loadandgenerationbalancewasessential.TheNYISOoperators
instructedallTOstonotifytheNYISOofallloadrestorationsandgeneratoravailability.The
TOswereinstructedtomatchloadwithgenerationasitbecameavailable.Voltagecontrol

wasalsoanimportantconsideration.Insomecases,loadwasrestoredfromgeneration,in
otherpartsofNewYorkloadwasrestoredtocontrolhighvoltagesduringlinerestoration.
Thisprocessofcoordinationwasverysuccessfulduetotherepeatedtrainingforthistypeof
eventandtheexcellentcommunicationsbetweentheNYISOandtheTransmissionOwner
operators.
By06:00onAugust15th,56%oftheloadhadbeenrestoredinNewYork.At7:35theNYISO
activatedvariousenergyandloadmanagementprogramsandalsorequestedthepublicto
voluntarilycurtailelectricuseandannouncedtemporarywaiversofairemissions
limitations.TheNYISOwaspreparingforthemorningloadtobeginpickingup.At08:00,in
aconferencecall,theNYISOnotifiedTOsthatloadsheddingmightberequiredduetothe
morningloadpickup.Thegroupagreedthattheexistingloadshedallocationprocess
wouldbemodifiedandthattheloadshedallocationswouldbecalculatedbasedonthe
percentageofthecurrentTOloadtothetotalNewYorkloadatthattime.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 18 of 69

DGAConsulting

Michigan
InMichiganthereweretwomajorutilitiesaffectedbytheblackoutConsumersEnergyand
DetroitEdison.10DetroitEdisonservesDetroitandthesurroundingareainsoutheastern
Michigan.ConsumersEnergyservesareastothewestofDetroitEdison.(DetroitEdison
washitmuchharderbytheblackoutthanConsumersEnergy.)Thetransmissionsystemis
ownedandoperatedbytwoindependentcompaniestheMichiganElectricTransmission
Company(METC)forthetransmissionsystemformerlyownedbyConsumersEnergyand
theInternationalTransmissionCompany(ITC)forthetransmissionsystemformerlyowned
byDetroitEdison.
MISOwasalsoinvolvedtheregionaltransmissionorganizationcoveringallorpartsof

Indiana,Illinois,Iowa,Kansas,Kentucky,Manitoba,Michigan,Minnesota,Montana,North
Dakota,Ohio,Pennsylvania,SouthDakota,andWisconsin.(SeeFigure2onpage10,
above.)
Consumers Energy
Restorationeffortsbeganimmediatelyfollowingtheevent.Localheadquartersinthe
affectedareaswereinstructedtoremainopen.Aconferencecallwasestablishedat17:15to
determineinitialactions.Subsequentcallswereheldeverytwotothreehoursthereafter.
IndependentcallswerealsoheldwithMETConasimilarschedule.
OntheConsumersEnergy/METCsystemthereweresignificantgeneratoroutages,numerous
lineoutages.Thereweretwomajorareaswithoutpower,theLansingareaandthe
southeastcornerofConsumersEnergysserviceterritory.
Immediatelyfollowingtheevent,ConsumersEnergystartedgenerationinresponsetothe
lossofunits.ConsumersEnergybelievedatthattimeitwasundergenerating,but
interconnectionfrequencycontinuedtobeabove60Hertz,whichwouldgenerallybean
indicationofovergeneration.Inconsultationwithtransmissionoperators,Consumers
Energymaintaineditsgenerationleveluntilthestatusofthesystem,bothinMichiganand
inneighboringareas,couldbeassessed.Between17:00and19:00poweroutputfromthe
LudingtonPumpedStoragefacilitywasreducedinordertomoderatehighfrequencylevels
andmanageavailablestoredwaterforlaterrestorationneedsofDetroitEdison.Consumers

10. ThisMichigansectionisbasedonMichiganPublicServiceCommissionsReportonAugust14thBlackout,
November2003.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 19 of 69

DGAConsulting

Energyalsoobtainedadditionalsuppliesofelectricityfrominstateindependentpower
producersandthemajorutilitytoitssouth,AmericanElectricPower(AEP).
Restorationeffortsfollowedblackstartprocedures;beginningbyassessingthe138kVand
46kVbreakersthatwereopen.Theopenbreakerswereplottedonageographicmapofthe
electricsysteminordertodeterminetheboundariesoftheaffectedareas.SystemControl
Centersthenbegantheprocessofopeningupallbreakerscontainedwithintheaffectedarea
viasupervisorycontrolanddataacquisition(SCADA)andfieldpersonnel.
ThereturnofgenerationattheWhitingfacility(a328MWcoalplantbuiltin1952thatalso
hasa15MWsimplecyclecombustionturbine)andrestartinggeneratorsatKinderMorgan
powerplant(a540MWgasfueledcombinedcycleplantbuiltin2002)wereatoppriority.
Theseunitsprovidebothlocalpowersupplyandareavoltagesupport.Nearlyallthe

138kVsystemwasrestoredby19:25.Duringrestorationofthe138kVsystemsome
46kVand138kVconnectedloadwasalsorestored.
Asgeneration,particularlytheKinderMorganpowerplant,beganrampingtowardfull
output,the46kVsystemwasrestoredintheaffectedarea.By22:05all46kVlineshad
beenenergizedandallloadwasreturnedtoservice.
AccordingtoConsumersEnergysOutageManagementSystem,upto118,400customers
wereoutofserviceduringthe16:00through22:00onAugust14th.
At22:30animportant138kVLinetrippedanddidnotrecloseduetolossofsubstation
power.Thisresultedinlargeflowsontheremainingtwocritical138kVlines,causingthem
toopenattheirsourceends.Thesystemwithinthesubjectgeographicareawasthenin
nearlythesamestateasitwasfollowingtheprimary16:09outage.
The138kVsystemwasrestoredagainby00:55andthe46kVsystemalongwithallofthe
connectedcustomerswasrestoredby01:35.
ConsumersEnergypersonnelhandledseveralreliabilityconcernsoverthenexttwodays.
Theseincludedproblemsinadheringtothederatedcapabilityofthecritical345kVline,the
clearancestatusof138kVlineslocatedwithintheaffectedarea,andlargepowerflows
betweentheMETCandITCsystems.Inaddition,continuedhotweather,unitoutagescaused
bytheevent,anduncertainpoweravailabilitytosupplementConsumersEnergysown
internalgenerationledtoaforecastofadeficiencyinConsumersEnergysoperating
reserve.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 20 of 69

DGAConsulting

ThefinalconcernwaspossibleseparationbetweentheConsumersEnergy/METCandthe
DetroitEdison/ITCsystemsduetoanyoneofthreesinglecontingenciesinvolvingtielines
betweenthetwosystemson16August.WithDetroitEdisonbeinggenerationdeficient,it
wasdependentupontheConsumersEnergy/METCsysteminterfaceforpowersupply.With
powerflowsbetweenthetwosystemsreachingthe3,000MWrange,analysisindicateda
singlecontingencywouldloadothertiesaboveemergencycapabilities.Thiscouldstarta
cascadingoutageresultinginseparation.Anumberofoptionswereimplementedto
preventthisfromoccurringincludingpatrolsofthetielinesidentifiedbytheanalysis.
Detroit Edison
TheDetroitEdisonserviceterritorywideoutageinvokedtheutilitysblackstartprocedures.
Theseprocedureswereinitiallydevelopedafterthe1965outage.Theydirectedallthe
availablefieldoperationsstafftotheproperlocationstosupporttherestorationeffort.
(ConsumersEnergyalsohadsimilarproceduresfromthattime.)Giventhe
telecommunicationandtrafficissuesthatoccurredimmediatelyaftertheincident,these
proceduressavedvaluabletimerestoringthesystem.
Theconventionalmobileandlandlinephonesystemsarenotdesignedforemergencies.The
volumeofcallsoverloadsthesystemsanditisoftenimpossibletoevengetadialtoneto
makeacall.Similarly,aftersuchanevent,oncepeoplerealizethesituationtheytaketo
theirautomobilesallatonceandtrafficquicklycomestoastop.Havingpersonnelknow
wheretopositionthemselvesbeforetrafficsnarls,allowsthemtobeinplacewhenneeded
aspartoftherestorationprocess.ThisisnotasituationuniquetoDetroit;itcommoninany
urbanareawhenablackoutoccurs.
DetroitEdisonfacedthedifficultprospectofrestartingitsentiregenerationfleet.Basically,
theylostalltheirgenerationabout9,500MW.Thisincludedabout7,500MWincoalplants
builtbetween1949and1985,a780MWgasfueledplantfrom1979,anda1,130MWnuclear
unit(1988).Oneofthecoalunitstrippedtohouseloadandwasrestoredwithinafew
hours.A330MW(fourgasturbines)independentpowerproducerwasreturnedtoservice
at20:15.Alargegasunitandanothercoalunitwererestoredbymiddaythenextday.
DetroitEdisonpersonnelalsoresolvedissuesatvariouspeakingfacilitiestoprovide950MW
ofadditionalcapacityonAugust15.11

11. AdditionaldetailscanbefoundinChart3.8oftheMichiganPUCblackoutreport.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 21 of 69

DGAConsulting

TheotherDetroitEdisongenerationtooklonger.
Alltheunitswereinspectedfollowingtheoutageandfourunitshadruptureddiscsthat
werereplaced.Thesmallercoalunitswererestoredbeginningasearlyas03:30onAugust
15th.Bytheafternoonofthe15th,sevenoftheseunits,totaling1,420MW,werebackin
service.TheremainingunitswererestoredbytheafternoonofAugust19thfourdaysafter
theblackout.
InadditiontoDetroitEdisonsgeneration,purchasesfromoutsidetheserviceterritoryin
coordinationwithindependentpowerproducerswerecrucialtotimelyrestoration.

Lessons learned
TheNorthAmericanElectricReliabilityCorporation(NERC)SteeringGrouprecommended
threecategoriestoaddresstheshortcomingsidentifiedintheinvestigation:
1. Actionstoremedyspecificdeficiencies:specificactionsdirectedtoFirst
Energy,MISO,andPJMtocorrectthedeficienciesthatledtotheblackout.
2. StrategicinitiativesbyNERCandtheregionalreliabilitycouncilstostrengthen
compliancewithexistingstandardsandtoformallytrackcompletionof
recommendedactionsfromAugust14,andothersignificantpowersystem
events:
a. StrengthentheNERCComplianceEnforcementProgram;
b. Initiatecontrolareaandreliabilitycoordinatorreliabilityreadinessaudits;
c. Evaluatevegetationmanagementproceduresandresults;and
d. Establishaprogramtotrackimplementationofrecommendations.
3. Technicalinitiativestopreventormitigatetheimpactsoffuturecascading
blackouts:
a. Improveoperatorandreliabilitycoordinatortraining;
b. Evaluatereactivepowerandvoltagecontrolpractices;
c. ImprovesystemprotectiontosloworlimitthespreadoffutureCascading
Outages;
d. Clarifyreliabilitycoordinatorandcontrolareafunctions,responsibilities,
capabilitiesandauthorities;
e. Establishguidelinesforrealtimeoperatingtools;

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 22 of 69

f.

DGAConsulting

Evaluatelessonslearnedduringsystemrestoration;

g. Installadditionaltimesynchronizedrecordingdevicesasneeded;
h. Reevaluatesystemdesign,planningandoperatingcriteria;and
i.

Improvesystemmodelingdataanddataexchangepractices.

2013 Sarawak
On27June2013theMalaysianStateofSarawaksufferedatotalgridfailureresultingina
statewideblackout.12At17:36thesystemfrequencystartedtodecay,fallingbelow47Hz
within10seconds,followedbycascadingtrippingofgenerationandtransmissionwithinthe
Sarawakpowergrid.

The situation before the blackout


Itwasafairlytypicalsummerafternoon.Beforetheblackoutsystemloadwasabout
1,555MWwith2,034MWofgenerationoperatinginthesystem.Thisisalittlelessthan90%
ofthemostrecenttwelvemonthpeakload.Systemfrequencywas50Hz(normal).Mostof
thegeneration(57%)wasatarelativelynewhydroelectricplantBakun.
TheloadandgenerationbalanceofthefiveregionsinSarawakjustbeforetheblackoutare
showninFigure7.Thefigureshowsthatfourareasareimportingpower,withBakun
exporting.Allfiveareashadsomelocalgenerationoperating.Theseloadandgeneration
balanceswereimportantregardingloadsheddingandformingelectricalislands.

12. Muchofthissectionisbasedon27June2013SarawakBlackoutDNVKEMAIndependentReview,Ministryof
PublicUtilitiesSarawak,Finalreport,PreparedbyKEMA,Inc.,6October2013.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 23 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 7: Regional load and generation just before blackout

The blackout
At17:36GenerationattheBakun,whichwasdelivering885MWtothesystem,droppedits
outputby662MWinabout10secondscausingsystemfrequencytodropbelow47.5Hz.To
protectalltheothergeneratorsinthesystemfromdamage,safetytrippingwas
automaticallyactivated,resultingintheshutdownofmostotherpowerstationsinthegrid.
Theunderfrequencyloadsheddingsystemactivated,sheddingabout500MWofloadinfive
steps.Frequencycontinuedtodecline,however,andthesystemwentblack14secondsafter
theinitialeventbegan.
TheinitiatingeventwasthesuddenrampdownofgenerationatBakundam.Itappeared
thatsomeoneinsidetheplantaccessedthepowerplantcontrolsystemandinadvertently
initiatedtheshutdown.Normally,thecontrolsareconnectedonlytoaspeciallocal
computercommunicationnetwork.Onthedayoftheblackout,thethreeunitsthatramped
downwerealsoconnectedtothenormalinternalofficecomputernetwork.Itappearsthat
someoneattheplantinadvertentlyinstructedthethreeunitstorampdown.Thereisno
evidencethatthiswasanykindofcyberattack.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 24 of 69

DGAConsulting

Restoration
RestoringtheSarawaksystemloadtookmorethansixhoursfollowingtheblackout.Nearly
halfofthistimealmostthreehourswasduetooperatorerrorsandequipment
malfunctionsatBakunduringrestoration.
TherewerealsosomedifficultiesattheBintulupowerplantthatdelayedrestoringlocal
loadsintheBintuluarea.Whilethreeunitswereoperatingimmediatelyaftertheblackout,
theotherBintuluunitscouldnotberestartedwithoutexternalpower.
Sarawakrestorationplansaredesignedtoguideindividualgeneratingplantoperatorsand
thesystemoperatorinquicklyrestoringthesystem.Eachofthesehasaplanwithspecific
stepsforrestoration.
Briefly,Sarawaksoverallblackstartrestorationplanincludes:
1. Determinethepostblackoutsystemandequipmentstatus;
2. Communicatewithrelevantparties;
3. Mobilizepersonnel;
4. Preparegeneratingplantsandthegridsystemforsystematicrestoration;
5. Reenergizeelectricislands;
6. Resynchronizetheelectricislandstorestoretheinterconnectedgridsystem;
and
7. Confirmthatthesystemisbacktonormalandallloadsareenergized.
Oncethegeneratingunitsarestartedatalowlevel,theyarereadyforstep5.Closing
distributionfeedercircuitbreakersconnectscustomerload.Inthiswayeachgenerator
increasesitoutputbyservingloadinitsgeographicarea.Thesearetheelectricislandsas
thelocalgenerationandloadisnotconnectedtogeneratorsinotherareas.
InSarawak,theplanistoformthreeelectricislands:
1. Kuching/SibuSarikel;
2. Bintululocal;and
3. BakuntoMiri275kV.
Aftertheelectricalislandsarerunningatareasonablelevel,theyarereadytostart
interconnectingwiththetransmissionnetworkandtheotherislands.Thisisstep6,above.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 25 of 69

DGAConsulting

Duringthe27Juneblackoutevent,theSibuSarikelelectricislandformed(almostexactlyas
planned),butnottheBintuluorBakun/Mirielectricislands.Kuchinghasagas/dieselpower
plantandBatangAIisahydroelectricplant.Thesewerebothconnectedtothesystem,
restoringloadintheKuchingareawithinabout30minutesoftheblackout.
Followingtheblackout,threegasfuelledgasturbineunitsatBintuluremainedoperatingat
fullspeedwithnoload.Theotherfiveunitstrippedoff.About45minutesaftertheblackout
(at18:25),the33kVbuswasenergizedandauxiliarypowerrestoredforfouroftheseunits.
Duringthenextthreehours,powerwaspartiallyrestoredtoloadintheBintuluarea.About
threehourslater(21:35,4hoursaftertheblackoutstarted)powerwasrestoredtoBakunthat
allowedauxiliarypowertoberestoredtotheremainingBintuluunits.
DuringtheovernighthourstheremainingBintuluunitswererestartedandsynchronized
withthegrid.Thisallowedloadtobefullyrestoredintheearlyhoursofthenextday.
Asmentionedabove,problemsatBakundelayedrestorationbyaboutthreehours.While
therewereanumberofblackstarterrorswithintheplant,themostsignificantwere
operationerrorsinthe275kVswitchyardattheplant.TheBakundamandswitchyardare
remoteathreehourdrivefromBintulu.Thismeantthatpowerplantpersonneloperated
breakersandswitchesattheBakun275kVswitchyard.Sincetheplantisremotewithlong
transmissionlines(about100km),voltagecontrolisanessentialelementinreconnectingthe
planttothemainSarawakgrid.SwitchingerrorsatBakuncausedsignificanthighvoltages
thatsetbackthenormalrestorationprocess.

Lessons learned
Maintainingcontinuityofplantpersonnelatremotepowerplantscanbeacontinuing
problem.TheBakundamisquiteremote,withnoeducation,entertainmentorsimilar
optionsforemployeesortheirfamilies.Nodoubtsomeoftheproblemsthereresultedfrom
thechurnofstaffattheplant.
Personnelmustbekeptcurrentintheirblackstarttraining.

2008 Oahu, Hawaii


About18:30on26December2008alightningstormknockedoutpowerthroughoutthe
HawaiianislandofOahuaftersunset,forcingPresidentelectBarackObamaandhisfamily
tospendthenightattheirseasidevacationhomeinthedarkaswindssweptinfromthe
ocean.Utilitycrewsrestoredpowertothepropertyaround06:00,andbymiddayelectrical

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 26 of 69

DGAConsulting

servicewasbackformanyoftheislands900,000residentsandthousandsoftourists,whose
highrisehotelsstoodmostlydark.

The situation before the blackout


Justpriortothelightningstorm,HawaiianElectricCompanys(HECOs)138kVtransmission
and46kVsubtransmissionsystemswereintheirnormalconfigurationwithalllinesin
service.Generationoperationwasnormal(1,300MW)toservethe1,040MWload.Spinning
reserveswere260MW,80MWabovetheHECO180MWminimumspinningreserve.HECOs
dispatchcenterandpowerplantswereproperlystaffed.LocationsofOahugenerationare
shownonFigure8andtheirstatusjustbeforetheblackoutisshowninTable2.

Figure 8: Oahu generation

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 27 of 69

DGAConsulting

Table 2: Summary of HECO generation


Unit

Rated (MW)

Available (MW)

Actual (MW)

2 HECO CTs

103

103

2 IPP CTs

164

164

162

18 HECO diesels

30

30

10 HECO steam

863

863

607

3 IPP steam

270

270

268

The blackout
TheIslandofOahuexperiencedaseverelightningstormonDecember26,2008thatlasted
fromapproximately18:00to18:50.DuringthisstormtheHECOtransmissionsystem
experiencedfiveseparateshortcircuiteventscausedbylightningstrikesonornear138kV
transmissionlines.
Oneofthesewasa3phasefaultonanimportant138kVtransmissionlinejustoutside
Honolulu.ThisfaultmomentarilydepressedvoltagesacrosstheHECOsystemtothepoint
whereapproximately145MWofvoltagesensitivecustomerequipmentautomaticallyshut
down.Thisvoltagedipalsoimpactedthenormaloperationofcertaingenerationplant
auxiliarysystemsleadingtopowerplanttripping.This,inturn,initiatedasequenceof
powersystemeventsduringthenextfewminutesthatultimatelyleadtotheislandwide
blackout.
Assystemfrequencydeclined,Underfrequencyloadshedding(UFLS)operatedasexpected
infivestages.Distributeddieselgeneratorsbegantransferringfromautotomanualcontrol
andshuttingdown,mostlikelyduetothefrequencydrop.

Restoration
PowerEngineers(aUSengineeringconsultingfirm)foundthatHECOsrestorationefforts
wereprudentandrestoredservicetoitscustomersexpeditiouslyconsideringthe
circumstances.Figure9showsthetimelineofgeneratorstartsasservicewasrestored
betweenabout19:00and15:00thenextdaywhenallcircuitswererestoredalongwith96%
ofcustomers.Afewpocketsremainedwithoutserviceuntilthenextmorning.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 28 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 9: Oahu restoration timeline

Therestorationtimelineshowsseveralfailedgenerationrestartsuntiljustafter01:00.
Generationandloadarethenrestoredatafairlylinearratethrough10:00whenmorethan
80%oftheloadwasrestored.
ThePowerEngineersreviewfoundthatHECOcouldnothavereasonablyanticipatedor
preventedthedamagingeffectsandinstabilitycausedbythelightninginitiated3phase
shortcircuittopreventthepoweroutagefrominitiallyoccurringorfromitbecoming
islandwideunderthecircumstances.13ThereportcontinuestheHECOsystemwasin
properoperatingconditionandwasappropriatelystaffedbypersonnelatthetimeofthe
lightningstorm.Thesystemoperatedappropriatelyunderthecircumstances.Inresponseto
thevariouslightningstrikes,automaticprotectiverelaysthataredesignedtosensea
disturbanceonHECOstransmissionsystemoperatedasdesigned.

Lessons learned
Thisblackoutrepeatstheexperiencewithotherblackoutswhenoperatorsarechallengedin
restoringserviceduringthefirstfewhoursfollowingtheblackout.

13. PowerEngineers,OutageReport,31March2009,pages34.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 29 of 69

DGAConsulting

2003 Italy
Earlyinthemorningof28September2003,Italyexperiencedamajorblackoutaffectingall
ofItalyexcepttheislandsofSardiniaandElba.PowerwasoutinItalyfor12hoursand
partofGeneva,Switzerlandfor3hours.Itwasthelargestblackoutintheseriesofblackouts
in2003,affectingatotalof56millionpeople.ItwasalsothemostseriousblackoutinItalyin
70years.
Thenightof27September2003isthenightoftheannualovernightNuitBlancheinRome.
Thus,manypeoplewereonthestreetsandallpublictransportationwasstilloperatingat
thetimeoftheblackoutdespitebeingverylateatnight.Theblackoutcausedthecarnivalto
endearly.Severalhundredpeopleweretrappedinundergroundtrains.Coupledwith
heavyrainatthetime,manypeoplespentthenightsleepingintrainstationsandonstreets
inRome.
ThroughoutItaly,110trainswerecanceled,stranding30,000people.AllflightsinItalywere
alsocancelled.Policedescribedthesceneaschaosbuttherewerenoseriousaccidents.
Theblackout,however,didnotspreadfurthertoneighboringcountries,suchasAustria,
SloveniaandCroatia,whichareconnectedtoItaly.

The situation before the blackout


Intheyearsbefore2003,ItalyselectricityimportsgrewsharplyduetoItalyssignificantly
higherelectricproductioncoststhantherestofEurope.ThefactthatSwitzerlandwasnot
integratedwiththeEuropeanelectricitymarketandoperationmeantthattheincreasing
importsintoItalywerealsoflowingonunscheduledparallelpathsthroughSwitzerland.
Thismeantthatloadsoncrossbordertransmissionlinesoftendeviatedfromscheduled
exchangeswithevergrowingamountsflowingontheSwisstransmissionlines.The
resultingpowerflowswerenotalwayswellcoordinatedbetweentheEuropeansystemand
Switzerland.
Atthetimeoftheevent,theItalianloadwasverylow27,444MW,including3,487MWof
pumpload.Italywasgenerating20,493MWandimporting6,951MWasshowninTable3.
Thetablealsoshowsthesignificantdifferencebetweenscheduledandactualflowsonthe
interconnectionswithSwitzerlandandFranceand,toalesserextent,withSlovenia.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 30 of 69

DGAConsulting

Table 3: Italian imports at 03:00 28 September 2003


Imports
Interconnection

Scheduled

Actual

Excess

Switzerland

3,068

3,610

542

France

2,650

2,212

-438

Slovenia

467

638

171

Austria

223

191

-32

Greece

285

300

15

6,693

6,951

258

Total

The blackout
Earlyinthemorningof28September2003Italywasimportingabout6,700MW(25%of
demand).14TheItalianpowersystemwasoperatingundern1securityconditions,andwas
capableofcorrectlydealingwiththelossofanyindividualelementofthegrid,including
anyinterconnection,orthelossofthelargestunitinservice.
At03:01,a380kVinterconnectionbetweenSwitzerlandandItalytripped.Thelinetripped
duetoaflashoverwithtrees.Severalattemptsmadebytheautomaticreclosingfacilities
wereunsuccessful.Amanualreclosingattemptmadeat03:08alsofailedbecauseofan
overlyhighphaseangle(42)betweenItalyandSwitzerland.
Anearbyparallelcircuitthenoverloaded.Thisoverloadwasacceptableinsuchemergency
circumstances,butfornomorethan15minutesaccordingtooperatingstandards.
Unfortunately,operatoractionsdidnotreducetheoverloadintime.After24minutes
(03:25),thisoverloadedlinealsotrippedwhenitflashedoverwithatree.
Aparallel220kVlinethentrippedimmediately.AlmostsimultaneouslytheItaliangridlost
itssynchronismwiththeUnionfortheCoordinationofElectricityTransmission(UCTE)main

14. MuchofthisItaliansectionisbasedontheUCTEreport:FinalReportoftheInvestigationCommitteeonthe28
September2003BlackoutinItaly,April2004.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 31 of 69

DGAConsulting

grid.15AllremaininginterconnectionsbetweenItalyandUCTEweredisconnectedbythe
normalactionofprotectivedevices.By03:26Italywasanelectricalisland.
TheseparationsequenceoftheinterconnectionsisshowninFigure10.Whilethefirsttwo
linesseparatedwithin24minutes,theother7interconnectionsopenedwithinabout90
seconds.

Figure 10: Separation sequence of Italian interconnections

Atthispoint,theItaliansystemhadgenerationequaltoonly75%ofitsload.Evenso,
generationwasnearlyabletomeetload,however,itwasnotenoughtoarrestthefrequency
decline.Inthethreeminutesafterseparation,thefrequencydeclinedto47Hzwhenanearly
completecollapseoftheItaliannetworkwasinevitable.
Someunderfrequencyrelaysactivatedtoformelectricalislandsoftwowelldefinedportions
ofthenetworkandtherelatedloadinsouthernItaly.Athermalunitshouldhavefedeach
island,butonlyonegeneratingunitwasinanormalconfiguration,so,onlyonesuccessfully
islanded.

15. UCTE,wasanassociationofTSOsin23countriesacrosscontinentalEurope.UCTEisresponsiblefor
coordinatingtheoperationanddevelopmentofelectricitytransmissiongridinandamongitsmember
countries

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 32 of 69

DGAConsulting

Thirtyonethermalunitsinitiatedthesequencetotriptohouseload.Onlyeightofthem
successfullycompletedthesequenceandremainedinisolatedoperationonhouseload.

Restoration
TherestorationplanforItalyisasetofcodedguidelinesthatareusedbyoperating
personneltorestoresupplyafteralargeareaincidentorblackout.Thisplanisbasedon
severalrestorationpathsdesignedtoworkinparallel:torestoretheauxiliaryservicesof
shutdownplants,toreconnectthethermalpowerplantsthatsuccessfullyislandedor
trippedtothehouseload,andtostabilizetheloadofsuchplants.
Therestorationpathsdesignedandusedforrestoringthenetworkaftertheblackout
were:

13innorthernItaly

9incentralsouthItaly

4inSicily

Thereare24hydroorgasturbineunitswithblackstartcapabilityusedtorestorethepaths.
Whilenospecificperformanceindexexists,theoverallsuccessoftheplandependsonfour
keyvariables:
1. Thenumberofavailablethermalunits,operatingontheirhouseloadafter
separationfromthegrid;
2. Thereadinessofhydroandgasturbineunitstoperformblackstart;
3. Thereliabilityoftelecontrolandtheirtelecommunicationsystemstooperate;
and
4. Theavailabilityofhydro,conventionalthermalandgasturbineunits.
Inthisblackout,mostoftherestorationprocesseswereperformed
satisfactorilyincomparisontotheseverityofthetotaloutage.Even

Restored
load (%)

so,ittookmorethan18hourstofullyrestoreserviceascanbeseen

50

6:30

inthetableontheright.

70

10:00

99

15:00

100

18:12

Anoverallviewofthetimingoftherestoredloadandthesupply

Time
Hr:min

sourcescanbeseeninFigure11.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 33 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 11: Italy restoration timeline

ThepostblackoutreviewbytheUCTEfoundthattheblackout:

Wasnotcausedbysomeextraordinaryoutofcriteriaeventsuchasasevere
storm,acyberattack,orsimultaneouslightningstrikesonseverallines,etc

WastriggeredbycausesinSwitzerlandwheretheinitialeventswereoutof
reachforactionbytheItalianoperators.

Therewerecountermeasuresforreturningthesystemtoasecurestateafter
thefirstcontingency(fromapurelytechnicalpointofview),buthuman,
technicalandorganizationalfactorspreventedthesystemfromreturningtoa
securestate.

Italiansystemrestorationwasperformedsuccessfully,however,itwould
havebeenshorterifmoreunitshadsuccessfullyswitchedtohouseload
operationorhaveperformedblackstartcorrectly.

Therestorationoccurredin4stages:
1. Stage1(03:28to08:00)diagnosisandNorthernArearesupply;
2. Stage2(08:00to12:00)Intermediatesteps
3. Stage3(12:00to17:00)ThecompleteresupplyofMainland

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 34 of 69

DGAConsulting

4. Stage4(17:00to21:40)ThefinalstageandtheresupplyofSicily
Italian restoration stage 103:28 to 08:00
Approximately3hoursaftertheblackout(06:30):

NorthwesternItalywasalmostcompletelyenergizedandreconnectedtothe
Frenchgrid;

EasternMilanareawassynchronizedwithSwitzerland;

AllnorthwesternItalythermalplantbuseswereenergizedand750MWwere
synchronizedandoperatingatminimumoutput;

EasternVeniceareawasfedbySlovenia;and

PartofthenorthernFlorenceareahadbeenconnectedtoLombardy.

Around08:00attheendofthefirststage:

ThenortheasterngridwasnotyetmeshedwiththerestoftheNorthern
SystembutitwassynchronouswithitviatheUCTEsystem.Thesubstations
inthatareawereenergizedandstableenoughtostartgeneratorauxiliary
services.

Inthecentralsouthernarea,nosignificantprogresshadbeenmade.

Duringthefirststagesomefailuresoccurred,suchasdifficultiesinstartingblackstartunits,
voiceanddatacommunicationproblemsandlackofinformationfromthefield.
TheSCADAsystemoftheNationalControlCenterinRomelostcompletevisibilityofthe
datarecordedintheFlorenceareaandnorthernRomeareafrom06:31to13:17.Two
strategieswereadoptedinthecentral,southernareasandinSicily:first,createasmany
islandsaspossibleinthesouthernareas,and,secondproceedstepbystepfromNorthto
SouthrelyingoninterconnectionwithUCTEandonoperatinghydroelectricresources.
Figure12showsthesituationattheendofStage1.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 35 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 12: Italy at the end of Stage 1 restoration

Italian restoration stage 208:00 to 12:00


Restoringthepowersystemcontinuedataslowerpacethandesiredbecauseofswitching
difficulties,mainlyduetotelecontrolsandtominorproblemsofdisconnectorsinsomekey
substations.Additionally,astheaccidenthappenedbeforethepumpedhydroplantshad
completedfillingtheirupstreambasins,availablehydroenergydecreased.Tocompensate
importswereincreased.
ThemarketoperatoraskedDistributorstointerruptindustrialloadsandimplementthe1st
levelofloadshedding(rotatingloadsheddingplan)from11:00to18:00inthenorthernand
centralnorthernregionsthatwereelectricallyrestored,buttheresponsewasnoteffective.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 36 of 69

DGAConsulting

IntheRomearea,at09:28afterafewattemptstodelivervoltagefromahydroblackstart
unitwhichhadfailedowingtovoltageinstability,another310MVAuniteastofRomewas
startedinordertobettercontrolthesamerestorationpath.From10:06theresupplyofthe
metropolitanareaofRomebegan.
Attheendofstage2,loadintheNorthernareawaspracticallyrestored.Althoughthe
380kVgridwasreenergizedtoRomeandtheAdriaticbackbonewasenergizedupto
Marcheregion,theresuppliedloadwasstilllow.
IntheSouthernareatwoelectricislandsinsouthernRomeandintheextremesouthwest
regionofCalabriawereinterconnectedandexpanded.
Figure13showsthesituationattheendofStage2.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 37 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 13: Italy at the end of Stage 2 restoration

Italian restoration stage 312:00 to 17:00


Onlyonethermalpowerplantinthesouthwasstillnotreenergized.Thestatusofthegrid
andthelackofgenerationinCentralSouthernItalyinducedhighpowerflowsfromNorth
toSouth,creatinganatrisksituation.Asituationthatbecameworseduringtheevening
peakperiod.ImportedenergyfromGreecebecamecriticalbecauseitenabledthepower
flowsbetweennorthernsouthernmacroareas,toberelievedofrestoringsecurity
conditions.ThesituationwasresolvedbyrestoringthelinkwithGreece;allowingimports
ofupto500MW.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 38 of 69

DGAConsulting

BytheendofStage3alloftheItalianpeninsulaandpartsofSicilywerereenergizedas
showninFigure14.

Figure 14: Italy at the end of Stage 3 restoration

Italian restoration stage 417:00 to 21:40


AllthevariousproblemsdescribedabovewereamplifiedintheSiciliangrid.
Afterseveralunsuccessfulattemptstorestoretheserviceindependently,withoutthe
mainlandinterconnection,itwasdecidedtosupplytheislandfromCalabria.Thiswasdone
at16:38buttheexchangecouldnotexceed200MW.Thus,theresupplytimewaslimitedby
AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 39 of 69

DGAConsulting

theneedtoadjusttheloadrampinItaly.WiththeSiciliangridrestored,theItalianpower
systemwasagainundercontrolandemergencyconditionsendedat21:40,alittlemorethan
18hoursaftertheblackout.Rollingblackoutscontinuedtoaffectabout5%ofthepopulation
onthenexttwodays(2930September)astheelectricitycompany,ENEL,continueditseffort
torestoresupply.

Lessons learned
TheUCTEreviewmadeelevenrecommendations,however,onlyafewmightbeapplicable
totheNEM:

Nationalregulationsshould,insofarastheyarenotyetimplemented,provide
for:

Bindingdefenseplanswithfrequencycoordinationbetweenload
shedding,ifany,andgeneratortripsettings;

Bindingrestorationplanswithunitssufficientlycapableoftriptohouse
load(TTHL)operationandblackstartcapability;

AsupporttoolfordynamicanalysisandmonitoringoftheUCTEsystemis
needed,so,theongoingWideAreaMeasurementSystem(WAMS)installation
programwasaccelerated;

Regionsshouldhavebindingdefenseplanswithfrequencycoordination
betweenloadshedding,ifany,andgeneratortripsettings;and

Onloadtapchangingtransformerblockingincaseofseverevoltagedrop
shouldbeacceptedpractice.

Aswithotherblackouts,therewasaperiodofconfusionwhilethesituationwas
understood,interconnectionswereusedfreelyasavailableaspartoftherestoringthe
system,andsomeblackstartandTTHLgeneratorsfailedtoperform.HavingalltheTTHL
generationavailablewouldnothavechangedtheoverallplanrestoringinterconnections
wouldremainthefirststephowever,restorationwouldhavebeenbothquickerand
smoother.IthasbeenestimatedthatnearlyalltheItalianload(exceptSicily)couldhave
beenrestoredin12hoursratherthan18.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 40 of 69

DGAConsulting

2011 San Diego, US


Ontheafternoonof8September2011,an11minutesystemdisturbanceoccurredinthe
PacificSouthwest,leadingtocascadingoutagesandleavingapproximately2.7million
customerswithoutpower.16TheoutagesaffectedpartsofArizona,SouthernCalifornia,and
BajaCalifornia,Mexico.AlloftheSanDiegoarealostpower,withnearlyoneandahalf
millioncustomerslosingpowersomeforupto12hours.Thedisturbanceoccurrednear
rushhour,onabusinessday,snarlingtrafficforhours.Schoolsandbusinessesclosed,some
flightsandpublictransportationweredisrupted,waterandsewagepumpingstationslost
power,andbeacheswereclosedduetosewagespills.Millionswentwithoutair
conditioningonahotday.

The situation before the blackout


September8,2011,wasarelativelynormal,hotdayinArizona,SouthernCalifornia,and
BajaCalifornia,Mexico,withheavypowerimportsintoSouthernCaliforniafromArizona.
Infact,importsintoSouthernCaliforniawereapproximately2,750MW,justbelowthe
importlimitof2,850MW.(Septemberisgenerallyconsideredashoulderseason,when
demandislowerthanpeakseasonsandgenerationandtransmissionmaintenanceoutages
arescheduled.)
DespiteSeptemberbeingconsideredashouldermonth,temperaturesintheImperialValley
(farsoutheasternCaliforniadeserteastofSanDiego)reached46C.Theloadoftheutility
servingtheImperialValleyareaheadedtowardnearpeaklevelsofmorethan900MW,
requiringittodispatchlocalcombustionturbinegenerationaccordingtoestablished
operatingprocedures.Fortyfourminutesbeforetheinitialeventthelocalutilityoperator
didnotnoticethatthelossofonekeytransformerwouldoverloadasecondtransformer
aboveitstrippoint.Theloadingonthesetransformerswaspivotaltothisevent.

16. AdaptedfromtheFERC/NERCStaffReportontheSeptember8,2011Blackout,April2012.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 41 of 69

DGAConsulting

ThesupplyanddemandconditionsofSanDiego
CountybeforetheblackoutareshowninTable4.
(Notethatthisisonlypartoftheareaaffectedby

Table 4: San Diego


County pre-event
supply and demand
MW

theblackout.)
Supply
Theimportantelementsofthesystemareshownin

Power plants

Figure15.ThecentralSanDiegocentralbusiness

Mexico

districtisintheareaaroundtheOldTownand

2,229
1,809
420

Imports

2,657

Missionsubstationsshowninthefigure.Thefigure

From north

1,287

alsoshowsthetwocriticalimportpathsintothe

From east

1,370

area500kVfromtheeastand230kVfromthe

Demand

4,293

north.TheSanOnofrenuclearplantislabeled
SONGSinthefigure.

Figure 15: San Diego area map of event

The blackout
Atabout14:00therewereproblemsatthe500kVNorthGilasubstationinArizona.An
experiencedtechnicianinadvertentlyskippedtwoofthesixteenstepsnecessarytoresolve
theproblem.Thisresultedinarcing,leadingtoaphasetophasefaultthattrippedthe
SWPLNorthGila500kVline.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 42 of 69

DGAConsulting

Arizonautilityoperatorserroneouslybelievedthattheycouldreturnthelinetoservicein
approximately15minutes,becausetheyhadnosituationalawarenessofalargephaseangle
differencecausedbytheoutage.Moretimewouldhavebeenneededtoredispatch
generationtoreducethephaseangledifferencetotheallowedvalue.
Asaresultofthelinetrip,flowsredistributedacrosstheremaininglinesintotheSanDiego,
ImperialValley,andYumaareas.ImmediatelyafterthetriptransformersatImperialValley
loadedto118%oftheiremergencyratings.Bothtransformerstrippedin40seconds.About
aminutelater,allthetransmissionwithflowsfromArizonatrippedandsomefrom
northernCalifornia.
ThemajorityoftheflowdivertedtothenorthernentrytotheSanDiegoarea,Path44.Flow
onPath44increasedbyapproximately84%,from1,293MWto2,362MW.
ThesituationatthistimeisshowninFigure16

Figure 16: The southern California situation at 15:28

AutomaticdistributionundervoltageprotectionintheImperialValleyareasystembegan
trippingdistributionfeedersandsheddingload.From15:32:11to15:33:46,444MWofthis
loadtripped.Generatorsandothertransmissionlinesintheareaalsostartedtrippingby
about15:35.ThesituationatthistimeisshowninFigure17.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 43 of 69

DGAConsulting

Figure 17: The southern California situation at 15:32

Lookingatloadingfromthenorth,aggregateloadingonthesouthofSONGS230kV
transmissionlinesincreasedfromapproximately6,700ampstoashighas7,800amps.(There
isaSONGSseparationschemethatactivatesat8,000amps.)Theloadingsettledaround7,200
ampsandremainedthere.
Between15:35and15:37,additionaltransmissiontrippedintheeasternpartofthearea.The
aggregateloadingsouthofSONGSincreasedfromapproximately7,200ampsto
approximately7,800amps.WhenthelastlinetrippedaggregatecurrentonPath44
increasedto8,400amps,wellabovethetrippointof8,000amps.
Bythistime,thesouthofSONGSlinesweretheSanDiegoareas(includingImperialValley
andMexicosnorthernBajapeninsula)onlysourceofcriticalimportedgeneration.Ifthe
aggregatecurrentwasbroughtbelow8,000amps,theblackoutcouldhavebeenavoided,but
atthispointnooperatoractioncouldhaveoccurredquicklyenough.Hadtherebeenformal
operatingproceduresthatrecognizedtheneedtopromptlyshedloadastheaggregate
currentapproached8,000,andhadoperatorsbeentrainedonthe8,000ampsetpoint,itis
possiblethatoperationoftheSONGSseparationschemecouldhavebeenavertedbyearlier
controlactions.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 44 of 69

DGAConsulting

MillisecondsaftertheImperialValleylineoutages;severalsmallergeneratorstotaling
432MWtripped,pushingthesouthofSONGSflowto9,500amps.
At15:38,notquite11minutesaftertheinitiallinetripped,theSONGSseparationscheme
operated,effectivelyseparatingallfivesouthofSONGS230KVtransmissionlinesand
separatedtheentireSanDiegoareafromtherestoftheWesternInterconnection.
TheelectricalislandcreatedbyoperationoftheSONGSseparationschemeleftasignificant
imbalancebetweengenerationandload.Asaresult,thefrequencyintheislandrapidly
declined.Inlessthanasecond,theUFLSprogramsbeganactivatingwithintheisland.This
ledtothefinalcascadinglossofgenerationandloadinthearea.
ThefinalblackouttotalsareshowninTable5.

Table 5: San Diego blackout statistics


Generation
lost (MW)

Demand
interrupted (MW)

Customers
affected

San Diego Gas & Electric

2229

4293

1,387,336

Southern California Edison

2428

117*

CFE (Mexico)

1915

2205

1,157,000

333

929

144,000

76

389

69,694

74

18,000

6982

7890

2,776,147

Company

Comision Federal de Electricidad


Imperial Irrigation District
Arizona Public Service
Western Area Power Association
Total

* These customers are served via San Diego Gas & Electric facilities

Restoration
Noneoftheaffectedentitiesneededtoimplementblackstartplansbecausetheyallwere
abletoaccesssourcesofpowerfromtheirownoraneighborssystemthatwasstill
energized.Therestorationprocessgenerallyproceededasexpected,andsomeentities
restoredloadmorequicklythantheyhadexpected.Table6showshowlongittookthe
affectedentitiestofullyrestoretheirlostload,generation,andtransmission.Table7isa
similartableofgenerationrestorationtimes.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 45 of 69

DGAConsulting

Table 6: San Diego area load restoration times


Load lost
(MW)

Time until
demand fully
restored

Date
restored

Demand fully
restored (hrs)

San Diego Gas & Electric

4,293

03:23

9/9

12.0

Southern California Edison

2,205

01:37

9/9

10.0

Imperial Irrigation District

929

21:40

9/8

6.0

Arizona Public Service

389

21:12

9/8

6.0

74

22:23

9/8

6.5

Entity

Western Area Power Association

Table 7: San Diego area generation restoration times


Generation restored

Generation
lost (MW)

Time

Date

Hours

San Diego Gas & Electric

2,428

06:33

9/12

87

Southern California Edison

2,229

06:20

9/10

39

CFE (Mexico)

1,915

23:43

9/10

56

333

20:42

9/8

76

20:37

9/8

Entity

Comision Federal de Electricidad


Imperial Irrigation District
Arizona Public Service

Lessons learned
Itispossibletocompletelyrestorelargeamountsofloadusingonlyinterconnections.
TheofficialreviewbyFERCandNERChadonlyafewimportantrecommendations:

Theyfelttheregionalcoordinator(WECC)couldhavetakenamoreactiverole
incoordinatingtherestorationefforts.Theregionalcoordinatorhasthe
largestareaofvisibilityandmoreadvancedrealtimestudytoolsthanthe
transmissionoperators.Duringamultisystemrestoration,issuesarelikely
toarisebetweenneighboringsystemsthatmayrequireeitheraneutral
decisionmaker,orrapidtechnicalanalysisofunplannedsystemconditions.

Therewasa30minutedebatebetweenSouthernCaliforniaEdisonandSan
DiegoGas&ElectricregardingresettingtheSONGSseparationscheme
lockoutrelay.Thisdelayedrestoringthetransmissionpathfromthenorth.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 46 of 69

DGAConsulting

TASK 2INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF


REGULATORY ARRANGEMENTS TO PREVENT OR
MITIGATE BLACKOUTS INCLUDING RESTORATION
TheprimarypurposeofthisTaskistoprovideinternationalcomparisonstotheNEMSRS.
EachexampledescribestheregulatoryarrangementsrelatedtotheSRS.Totheextent
possible,thereportidentifiesanydocumentsthatestablishsimilarrequirementstotheSRS.
Thechapterdescribesfiveinternationalexamplesoftheregulatoryarrangementsdesigned
topreventoramelioratemajorsupplydisruptionsintheelectricitysystem.Theexamples
wereselectedinconsultationwithAEMCReliabilityPanelfromalistofsuggestionsbyDGA.
Theselectedsystemsarefromfourdifferentcountries,andthreecontinents.
Thefiveselectedwere:

PJM,US;

SouthAfrica;

Italy;

ERCOT,US;and

Ireland

TheAEMCReliabilityPanelincludedspecificitemstocompareintheirRFP.Eachoftheseis
summarizedinTable8,below.

Context for comparison


TheAEMCReliabilityPanelisinterestedincomparinginternationalregulationand
proceduresrelatedtoblackoutsandblackstartgeneration.SomeoftheissuesthattheAEMC
isinterestedincomparingincludetheminimumblackstartrequirementsregarding
amountsandresponsetimes.TheseareincomparisonwiththeSRSthatrequirestheAEMO
toprocureenoughblackstartcapacitytoenergizeenoughgenerationtosupply40%ofthe
loadwithin4hours.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 47 of 69

DGAConsulting

Table 8: International comparison of regulatory arrangements to prevent or ameliorate blackouts


System/region
Characteristic

PJM (page 50)

South Africa (pg 53)

Italy (page 53)

ERCOT (page 54)

Ireland (page 56)

Any specific variables for system


restoration (and their values), such as time
for restoration of auxiliaries or generation,
specific volume of generation capability to
be restored, or reliability requirements for
restart units

Synchronize in 3
hours
4 hours to energize
nuclear units

Each black-start plant


must energize a large
coal plant in 4 hours

None, only general


comments

Unwritten
understanding of 4
hours for nuclear
plants

Thermal black-start
plants must
synchronize within 30
minutes of being
energized

Any requirement for the system to be able


to restore certain quantities or percentages
of total load within a specific timeline

Time only for nuclear


units
Restore critical load

None

None

No time required
Amount is confidential

None
There are priority
loads

Any specification of the scale of the power


system event that must be addressed (such
as whether the event is assumed to be subregional, regional or countrywide), and how
this affects the level of restart services to
be procured

Assumes both zonal


and system-wide
blackouts, but the plan
is to use the zonal
black-start resources
to restore the system.

National

National

Entire system

National

Any deterministic requirements, such as a


minimum number of restart services that
must be procured (ie including any
contingency/reserve restart services)

At least 2 for each


zone
Can be located in
adjacent zone

2 plants for entire


nationa pumpedhydro plant and 2
large diesel at a coal
plant

None

None, but multiple


black-start units will be
needed for such a
large system

At least one blackstart unit in each of


four subsystems

Any system specific requirements, such as


a requirement to restore transmission
corridors to a stable voltage

None

All generators
>200 MW must be
capable of TTHL for 2
hours

None

None

None

Any restoration priority for specific loads


(eg sensitive economic loads such as
aluminum smelters, critical services such

Nuclear plants
Critical natural-gas
infrastructure

Nuclear plant

Hospitals, etc. all have


emergency generators
Large industrial loads

Nuclear plants
Natural-gas pipeline
compressors and

None

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 48 of 69

DGAConsulting

System/region

Characteristic
as hospitals) or specific generators (such
as nuclear power stations), including
whether the system operator must prioritize
these generators when restarting the power
system

PJM (page 50)


Specific loads may be
designated by zone
operators

South Africa (pg 53)

Italy (page 53)


also have local
generation to supply
their critical loads

ERCOT (page 54)


processing stations

Ireland (page 56)

Any specific assumptions regarding the


underlying condition of the power system,
such as specific network or generator
outages

Generally normal
conditions (see text)

None

Peak load

Summer peak

Peak and off-peak

Any requirements related to the diversity


(eg fuel, strategic, electrical or geographic
location) of restart services

None

None

None

None

None

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 49 of 69

DGAConsulting

TheeightcharacteristicsinTable8cansimplifiedasfollows:
1. Specificsystemrestorationvariablestheonlyrequirementsweretore
energizethesystembusofnucleargeneratorswithin4hours;
2. Loadrestorationamountsandtimingnoneofthesystemshadsuch
requirements;
3. Assumedblackoutscalevariedamongthesystems;
4. Deterministicrequirementsmostrequiremultiplesources,butallowed
usingtheinterconnections;
5. Systemspecificrequirementsgenerallynone;
6. Restoringpriorityloadsnuclearplantsandnaturalgaspumpingstations;
7. Underlyingsystemconditionassumptionsnormalconditions;and
8. Diversityrequirementsnone.
Caseswheretheresponsesshowninthetablearenontrivialarediscussedbelow.

PJM, US
ThePJMInterconnectionisaregionaltransmissionorganization(RTO)thatcoordinatesthe
movementofwholesaleelectricityinallorpartsof13statesandtheDistrictofColumbia.
Actingasaneutral,independentparty,PJMoperatesacompetitivewholesaleelectricity
marketandmanagesthehighvoltageelectricitygridtoensurereliabilityformorethan61
millionpeople.PJMincludesthe21transmissionzonesshowninFigure18with184,000MW
ofgeneration.Eachzoneisresponsibleforacquiringthenecessaryblackstartcapacity.17

17. PJMsblackstartrequirementsaredescribedinPJMManual12:BalancingOperationsandManual36:System
RestorationAttachmentA:MinimumCriticalBlackStartRequirement.Themanualsareavailableat
www.pjm.com/documents/manuals.aspx.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 50 of 69

Figure 18:

PJMs

DGAConsulting

21 transmission zones

Specific system restoration variables


Blackstartgenerationisintendedtoenergizeunitswithahotstarttimeoffourhoursor
less.Blackstartgeneratingunitsmustbeabletoclosetheoutputbreakertoadeadbus
withinthreehoursofarequestfromthelocaltransmissionownerorPJM.PJMmayrequire
someblackstartresourcestoadheretolessthanathreehourstarttime.(Athreehourstart
timemaynotbeappropriatetomeetnuclearpoweroffsitesafeshutdownloadrestoration
requirements.)
Theremustbeenoughblackstartgenerationineachzonetobeabletostart110%ofthe
criticalload.ThetransmissionoperatorineachPJMzonedeterminesthecriticalload.
Criticalloadsinclude:

Crankingpowertocriticalgeneration(thermalunitswithhotstarttimesless
than4hours);

Crankingpowertocombustionturbines;

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 51 of 69

DGAConsulting

Offsitenuclearstationlightandpower(2independentfeeds);

Includingunitsofflinepriortodisturbance;

Ensureasafeshutdownofnuclearorothergeneration;

Facilitateastationstartup;

Unitswithahotstarttimeof4hoursorless;

Criticalgasinfrastructure(keyinaquickrestart);

Powertoelectricinfrastructure;

Lightandpowertocriticalsubstations;

Pumpingplantsforundergroundcablesystems;

Criticalcommunicationequipment*;

Criticalcommandandcontrolfacilities*;and

Underfrequencyloadshedcircuits*.

(Itemsmarkedwithanasterisk(*),canbesuppliedbylocalstorageorgeneration.)

Underlying system condition assumptions


ThefollowingassumptionsareappliedtoplanningforaSystemRestoration:

Totalzoneblackout(noassistancefromexternalsystems);

Normalweatherpattern(notaresultofanaturaldisasterorextreme
weather);

Intermediatetopeakloadlevel(marginalsteamunitshot);

Minimalequipmentdamage(transmission/generation);

Normalworkinghours(sufficientpersonnellocatedinthefieldoroncall);

Variablessuchasthecurrentschedulingstrategies,theamountofnuclear
unitsoperating,loadlevels,weatherconditions,equipmentdamageandthe
amountofdirectpurchasesmayimpactrestorationtimes.Longerrestoration
timesmayresultfromdisturbancesduringoffpeakhoursordisturbances
resultingfromextremeweatherpatterns.Fasterrestorationtimesmaybe
possibledependentuponactualsystemseparationboundaries,theabilityto
importgenerationandstatusofequipment.

Otherhighpriorityloadwhichshouldbeconsideredearlyintherestoration
processinclude:

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 52 of 69

DGAConsulting

Crankingpowertogenerationwithgreaterthan4hourstarttime;

Powertoelectricinfrastructureinaccordancewithtimeframedefinedin
restorationmanual;

LightandPowertorestorecriticalsubstations(ifapplicable);

Pumpingplantsforundergroundcablesystems;

CriticalCommunicationEquipment;

Criticalcommandandcontrolfacilities;and

Underfrequencyloadshedcircuits.

South Africa
TheSouthAfricansystemreflectsmanycharacteristicsofacentralizedsystem.Blackstart
requirementsaresetintheGridCode.TheCoderequirestwoblackstartplantsforthe
nation.Oneisa4x250MWpumpedhydroplantandtheotheristwo2030MWdiesels
locatedatalargecoalplant.
TheCodealsorequiresallunits>200MWtobeabletotriptohouseload(TTHL)foratleast
twohours.Interestingly,theseunitsarenotcountedaspartoftheblackstartrequirements.
Theemphasisisonstartingthelargecoalunits.

Italy
Italianmapsandotherdatawerediscussedaboveregardingthe2003blackoutbeginningon
page30.RecentItalianpeakloadwasabout51,000MW,thoughthealltimepeakofalmost
57,000MWoccurredin2007.
TheTernaGroupisthegridoperatorfortheItalianelectrictransmissionsystem.Ternais
thelargestindependentTransmissionSystemOperator(TSO)inEurope.Itownsthe
NationalHighVoltageTransmissionGrid,andisresponsibleforthetransmissionand
dispatchoftheelectricityfortheentireCountrywith~3,500employees.Itoperatesabout
63,900kmofthreephaseconductors,21interconnections,and491substations.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 53 of 69

DGAConsulting

TheItalianrestorationplanisapublicdocument,butitisallinItalian.18Therearetwo
prioritiesintheItalianrestorationplan:
1. RestorecorridorsfromtherestofEuropeacrosstheAlpstoquicklyenergize
portionsoftheinternalgrid,and
2. Emphasizerealtestingofrestorationstrategiesandtrainingoftheoperators.
TheblackstartstrategycombinesrestorationwithsupplyfromtherestofEurope(1st
priority)andcreatingelectricislands,withtheislandsprogressivelymeshedand
synchronizedwiththerestofthesystem.
WhilethereisnomarketforblackstartserviceinItaly,anumberofgeneratingunitsare
designatedasblackstartand,assuch,areboundbyagreementswithTerna(e.g.theyhave
toagreeontheirmaintenanceperiod,aresubjecttoperiodictestingofblackstartcapability,
etc.).
TheunitswithblackstartcapacityareidentifiedinstudiesperformedbyTerna.Thekey
variablesaregeographicallocation,transmissiongridtopology,andthepossiblerestoration
transmissioncorridors.Theselectedblackstartunitsaredefinedandtestedthrough
dynamicsimulationsandrealtimetesting,wheneverpossible.

ERCOT, US
TheElectricReliabilityCouncilofTexas(ERCOT)managestheflowofelectricpowerto24
millionTexascustomersrepresentingabout90percentofthestateselectricload(see
Figure19).Astheindependentsystemoperatorfortheregion,ERCOTschedulespoweron
anelectricgridthatconnectsmorethan70,000kmoftransmissionlinesand550generating
units.Thesystempeakloadisabout70,000MW.Therearemorethan1,400activeentities
thatgenerate,move,buy,sellorusewholesaleelectricity.

18. PianodiRiaccensionedelSistemaElettricoNazionale,(RestorationPlanoftheNationalElectricSystem).

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 54 of 69

Figure 19:

ERCOT

DGAConsulting

area of Texas

InERCOT,blackstartserviceisanancillaryserviceprovidedbyaresourceabletostart
withoutsupportoftheERCOTtransmissiongrid.Itisprocuredcompetitivelyeverytwo
years.ERCOTisallocatedaspecificamountoffundingtospendtoprocureblackstart
services.
Factorsusedinselectingblackstartunitsinclude:

Fuelsupply(notdiversity),capabilitytorunonauxiliaryfuelsupply;

Locationrelativetomajorloadcenterortransmissioncorridorthatconnects
nextstartresources;

Startuptime,ramprates;and

Resourcecost.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 55 of 69

DGAConsulting

Ireland
Irelandis,literally,anisland.TherearetwoHVDCinterconnectionswiththeUK500MWto
theDublinareafromWalesand500MWtotheBelfastareafromScotland.Otherwise,they
dependontheirownislandresourcestosupplyload.Itshouldalsobenoted,thattheHVDC
linksdonothaveblackstartcapability.Peakloadontheislandisabout6,500MWandis
suppliedbyalmost10,000MWofgeneration.Inaddition,windgenerationismorethan
2,600MW,andisexpectedtotriple.

Restoring priority loads


Priorityloadsincludethepowersystemcontrolcentersthemselves,hospitals,airportsand
otherloadsofnationalimportance.Ingeneral,Irelanddoesnothavethekindofpriority
loadsthatAustraliahas;e.g.smelters.

Underlying system condition assumptions


Irelandcanhaveanationalblackoutatanytime,dayornight,soavarietyofloadconditions
arestudied.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 56 of 69

DGAConsulting

TASK 3CHANGES ANTICIPATED FOR BLACK-START


PLANNING IN SYSTEMS WITH VERY HIGH LEVELS
OF RENEWABLE GENERATION
Afewregionsintheworldareexperiencingtheeffectofveryhighpenetrationlevelsof
renewablegeneration.TheseincludeHawaii,Ireland,Denmark,andSouthAustralia,
amongothers.Thesesystemswillfacesomenewchallengesastheproportionofrenewable
energygenerationincreasesfurther.Thischapteraddressessomeofthesechallengesand
potentialmitigationmeasures,especiallyastheyapplytotheNEM.

Nature of renewable generation affecting blackouts and black-start


Thereisarangeofrenewableenergygenerationconsideredfromwindandphotovoltaic
(PV)torenewablesthatincludehydro,geothermal,wasteheat,etc.Thelattercanbe
dispatchedlikeconventionalgenerationthatis,theiroutputcanbecontrolledupordown
andtheydonotrelyonvariableenergysourceslikethewindorsunshine.Thischapter
focusesonthetwotypesofrenewableenergygenerationthatareproblematicforsystem
operationwindandsolar.
Windisusuallyeasiertointegratethansolar.Windblowsdayornight,thoughonshore
windtendstovarymoreandoftenstopsduringveryhotweather.Offshorewind,onthe
otherhand,tendstoblowmoresteadilydayandnight.Inaddition,windgeneratorshave
somerotationalinertiaintheirrotatingbladesthatreducestheirinstantaneousvariability.
Solargeneration,incontrast,onlyproducesenergyduringthedayfromafewhoursafter
sunrisetoafewhoursbeforesunset.Solarisalsosubjecttoveryrapidoutputchangesas
cloudspassoverhead.
Anotherimportantdifferenceisinprojectsize.WindgenerationisMWscaleunitsthatare
oftenpartofawindfarm,whilerooftopPViskWscaleinindividualunits.(Therearealso
largescalesolarprojectsthatareMWscale.)Thisisanimportantdifference.
RooftopPVisusuallyconnectedatlowvoltagesathomesorbusinesses.Thesesmall
projectsoperatebasedonlocalcontrolandareinvisibletosystemoperators.Whena
distributionfeederhasmanyrooftopPVsystems,itcanproduceenoughpowertobackfeed
powertothesubstation.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 57 of 69

DGAConsulting

TheMWscaleprojectswillusuallybeconnectedathighervoltagesandcanbemonitoredin
realtimebysystemoperators.Furthermore,windisusuallyproducedinwindfarmsthat
includemultipleunitswithasingleconnectionpointthatincludesrealtimemonitoring.19
Bothwindandsolargeneratorsproducedirectcurrent(DC).Bothuseaninverterto
transformtheDCintoalternatingcurrent(AC)power.Thesecharacteristicsprovideatleast
twoadvantages:
1. TheycanchargebatteriesdirectlyavoidingAC/DCtransformationlosses;
and
2. Theinvertersoffersomepotentiallyusefulfeaturesveryrapidcontrol,and,
advanced(fourquadrant)inverterscancontrolbothpower(MW)andvoltage
(var).
Theimpactofthesefactorsonblackoutsandsystemrestorationisdiscussedbelow.

Impact on blackouts
WindandsolarPVgenerationcanhavesomepositivebenefits,buttheycancauseserious
operatingproblems.Evenso,therearemitigationmeasuresthatcanbeusefulinpreventing
blackoutsorassistingrestoration.

System inertia
Inconventionalgeneration,rotatinginertiaprovidesarapidreserveofpowerthathelps
stabilizesystemfrequency.Whenasystemlosesgenerationthefrequencydeclines.The
rotatinginertiaofconventionalgenerationinstantlyincreasesgeneratoroutputastheyslow.
Duringtheseconditionsgeneratorscanbrieflyprovidemuchmorethanratedoutput.After
afewsecondsgovernorandothercontrolswillincreasetheenergy(fromsteamornatural
gas)deliveredtothegenerator,increasingitsoutput.
Sincethefinalstagesofblackoutsusuallyoccurinlessthanaminutefasterthanhumans
canunderstandandresponditisautomaticactionsthatpreventblackouts.Oneoftheseis
theinertialresponseofgenerators.Thisslowsthespeedthatfrequencyfalls,givingother
automaticsystemstimetorespond.(Thishappenedinalltheblackoutexamplescitedas
partofTask1.)

19. AllthewindgenerationinSouthAustraliaisinwindfarmsofatleast30MW.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 58 of 69

DGAConsulting

Inmajorpowershortages,UFLSandundervoltageloadshedding(UVLS)aredesignedto
arrestthefrequencydeclineandgivethegeneratorgovernorstimetoincreasegeneration
enoughtopreventatotalcollapse.Allofthisisprettyautomatic.Intheminutesandhours
thatfollow,systemoperatorsarethenabletorestorenormaloperation.
RooftopPVgenerationhasnorotationalinertiaandwindhasverylittle.So,assystem
frequencydeclinestheycontinueproducingthesameoutput.RooftopPVsystemsalsodo
notrespondtovoltagevariations.(MoreonthisunderPossiblemitigationmeasures
startingonpage64.)
Inaddition,invertersusedwithwindandPVareusuallysizedatabout105%ofthesources
maximumratedoutput,providinglittleroomforshortburstsofpowerlikeconventional
generation.Conventionalgenerators,incontrast,provideveryhighfaultcurrents.While
thismightseemtobeabadthing,itisimportantinprotectingthesystem.Protectiverelays
andfusesaresettorespondwhenfaultcurrentsoccurthataremuchhigherthaninnormal
operation.Conventionalgeneratorswillbrieflyprovide400%ormoreoftheirratedoutput
underfaultconditions.Thisbriefsurgeofcurrentiswhatsignalsrelaystooperateand
causesfusestoblow.Withoutsuchhighfaultcurrentfromconventionalgeneratorsor
someothersource,protectionplansandsettingswillhavetobecompletelyrevised.
AstheamountsofwindandPVincreaseduringoperation,therewillbelessconventional
generationoperatingaspartofnormaleconomicdispatch.20Thiswillsignificantlyreduce
therotatinginertiaofthesystem.Itwillalsoreducefaultcurrentlevelsthatwilldisrupt
systemprotectionschemes.Theresultisthatmuchmorerapidfrequencyswingsoccur
duringcontingencies.Thus,automaticsystemsdesignedtopreventablackoutwillhave
muchlesstimeact.

Ramp-rates (rate of change of frequency)


Besidesinertialresponsediscussedabove,conventionalgeneratorscanincreaseand
decreasetheiroutputoveraperiodofminutesautomaticallyorunderoperatorcontrol.Itis
generatorgovernorsthatvarytheenergyinputtotheturbinesthatproduceelectricity.
Alongwithanyinertialresponse,thesecontrolsareusedtomaintainanearlyconstant

20. WindandPVhavenearzeroshortrunmarginalcostsandwillbedispatchedaheadhighercostconventional
generation.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 59 of 69

DGAConsulting

frequencyascustomerloadandotherconditionschangefromsecondtosecondduringthe
day.ThisabilityismeasuredasramprateandusuallystatedasMW/minute.
Theamountoframprateforaunitdependsonitsizeandtechnology.Generally,larger
unitshavehigherramprates;andcombustionturbineshavehigherrampratethansteam
units.Thesystemoperatormustseethatthecombinedrampratesoftheoperating
generatorsareenoughtomeettheexpectedchangesinsystemload.
TheoutputofwindandPVoftenhassteeprampsasopposedtothecontrolled,gradual
rampupordowngenerallyexperiencedwithelectricitydemandandtheoutputof
conventionalgeneration.Managingtheserampscanbechallengingforsystemoperators,
particularlyifdownrampsoccurasdemandincreasesandviceversa.
TherecanberapidfluctuationsinoutputofrooftopPVsystemsfrompassingclouds.Ifthe
conventionalgeneratorscannotrampfastenoughtomatchthevariabilityofthePV(or
wind)systems,afrequencymismatchmayaffectthewholesystem.Thiscouldleadto
underfrequencyloadsheddingorevenblackouts.

Under-frequency and under-voltage response


Asmentionedabove,adistributionfeederwithalotofrooftopPVcanbackfeedthe
substationduringsunnydays.Thiscanbeachallengeinsettingprotectiverelaysandfuses
inthesefeeders.Inpreblackoutconditionsthisbackfeedcancauseseriousproblemswith
UFLSandUVLS.

NormallyUVLSandUFLSaredesignedtoshedloadwhenloadexceedsgenerationandeither
frequencyorvoltagesfalltoofarand/ortoofast.Reducingloadinsuchconditionsallows
generatorstoregainbalancewithloadandslowlyrestorenormalconditions.
IfafeederthatispartoftheUVLSorUFLSsystemisbackfeedingitwillhavethewrong
impact.Insteadofhelpingrestorethegenerationloadbalancebyreducingsystemloadit
willreducesystemgeneration,andmakethesituationworse.Theoppositeofwhatwas
intended.
Complicatingmattersfurther,isthatsuchabackfeedcanonlyoccurduringdaylight,and
typicallybetween10:00and15:00whensunshineisbrightest.Sosuchafeederwouldneed
tobeexcludedfromUFLSandUVLSduringthesedaylighthours,butotherwisebeincluded
normally.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 60 of 69

DGAConsulting

Asdiscussedabove,highlevelsofwindandsolarPVwillreducetheamountofconventional
generationoperating.Theresultingreducedrotatinginertiameansthatsystemfrequency
willfallfasterwhenageneratorislost.(Frequencywillalsoincreasefasterwhenalarge
loadislost.)Thismakesthesystemlessrobustandmoresusceptibletoblackouts.
ThereisarelatedissuethatisimportantwithwindandPVlowvoltageridethrough.
Mostinvertercontrolsaredesignedtodisconnectwhenvoltagesfalltoacertainamount.In
systemswithhighlevelsofwindandPV,voltagescanfallfasterandfartherthansystems
withmoreconventionalgeneration.Inthesesituations,voltagescanremainlowlonger,
and,ratherthandisconnect,thewindandPVshouldremainconnectedlongertoseeif
voltagerecovers.Otherwise,trippingthewindandPVduringpowershortageconditions
willmakeconditionsworse.

Coincident frequency reaction


ManyutilitiesestablishedpoliciesanddesignstandardsforwindandrooftopPVgeneration
beforeitwasclearhowmuchofthisgenerationcouldbeinstalledonthesystem.Windand
rooftopPVcommonlydisconnectwhenlosingsourcepowerandwaitafixedperiodto
restartoncepowerisrestored.Thiskeepsrepaircrewssafewhenrepairingdamagethat
causedalocaloutage.Thesesystemsalsodisconnectwhenthefrequencydropstoaset
levelorvoltagegetstoolow.
SinceallthesewindandPVsystemsrespondwiththesamesettings,theyarecoincident.
Theywillalldropoutataboutthesamefrequencyorvoltage.Thiscanproduceadditional
shockstothesystemduringamajordisturbanceincreasingthechanceofablackout.

Over voltages
HighlevelsofwindandrooftopPVcancausehighvoltagesinthetransmissionsystemand
ondistributionfeeders.Voltagestendtobehigheratgeneratingsourcesandthese
generatorsraisevoltages.Thiscanbeaspecialproblemondistributionfeederswithalotof
rooftopPV.Voltagescanbecomehighenoughthatthesubstationequipmentcannotkeep
voltageswithinacceptablelimits.
BoththeseresourcesuseinverterstoconverttheirDCoutputtoAConthesystem.These
invertersgenerallyusethesimplestandleastexpensivedesignsespeciallyforrooftopPV.
Theseinvertersonlycontrolthepoweroutputanddonotcontrolvoltageorvaroutput.
(Moreonthisbelow.)

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 61 of 69

DGAConsulting

Restart capability
OneadvantageofwindandPVcomparedwithconventionalgenerationisthattheycanbe
restartedandbroughttofulloutputveryquicklyassumingthesunisshiningandthe
windisblowing.Itcantakeonlyaminuteortwoifconditionsareright.Mostinvertersare
designedasfrequencytakerstheymatchthesystemfrequencyandvoltageofthepower
system.Theyareabletomatchafairlywiderangeoffrequenciesawiderrangethan
conventionalgenerators.
Inverterscanbedesignedtoprovidetheirownfrequencysignal,independentoftheoverall
system.WindorPVgenerators,especiallythosewithassociatedenergystorage,couldbe
usedtorestartafterblackoutandformanelectricalisland.Suchanarrangementcould
speedrestorationandaddconsiderableflexibility.

Impact on restoration
HighamountsofwindandrooftopPVinasystemwillimpactsystemrestorationfollowinga
blackout.Oneoftheobviousimpactsisthatloweramountsofconventionalgenerationwill
bewarmoravailableforTTHL.Thisconventionalgenerationwouldbeamongthefirst
resourcesusedtorestartthesystem.Withmorerenewablegenerationtherewillbeless
conventionalgenerationoperating,makingrestorationharder.
Restoringthesystemafterablackoutinvolvesreenergizingthetransmissionsystemwhile
balancinggenerationandload,andcontrollingvoltages.Windgenerationhassome
advantagesoverrooftopPVinrestoration.Windgenerationisconnectedtothetransmission
system,monitoredinrealtimebythesystemoperator,and,withinlimits,canbedispatched.
Windforecastmodelscouldestimatetheamountofenergythatwindgenerationcan
producefollowingablackout.Thesewindgeneratorscanbeusedinrestoringthesystem
especiallyiftheirinvertershavevoltagecontrol.
RooftopPVdoesnothavethevisibilityorcontrolthatwindgenerationhas.ThesePV
systemsdisconnectwhenpowerislost.Aspowerisrestoredtodistributionfeeders,these
PVsystemswouldremainoff.Connectingthesefeederswouldaddtheexpectedtoload

usedtobalancegenerationintherestartprocess.However,afterasetdelay,thePVsystems
wouldautomaticallyspringbacktolifereducingthenetloadonthefeederand
complicatingrestoration.OnfeederswithalotofPVtheimpactwouldbeevenworse.
Ofcourse,theseproblemswithPVwouldonlyoccurduringthedaytime.Sosystem
operatorswouldneeddifferentproceduresfordayornightconditions.And,sinceamajor

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 62 of 69

DGAConsulting

blackoutmighttake12hoursormoretofullyrestore,restorationwouldprobablyoccur
partiallyinthedayandpartiallyinthenight.

Possible mitigation measures


Therearesomereasonablemeasurestomitigatethenegativeimpactsofwindandrooftop
PV.Therearealsosomemoreextremeoptions.

Conventional generation
Obviouslyenoughconventionalgenerationwithblackstartcapabilitywouldallowa
successfulrestart.Mostsimplecyclecombustionturbinescanblackstart.Similarly,the
combustionturbinesectionsofcombinedcycleplantscanusuallyalsoprovideblackstart
capacity.

Increased inertia and fault currents


Systeminertiaandfaultcurrentarereducedasmorewindandsolargeneration(andless
conventionalgeneration)operates.Onesolutionistousesynchronouscondensersto
increaserotatinginertiaandfaultcurrents.Synchronouscondensersarephysicaldevices
connectedtothepowersystemthatrotateatsynchronousspeed.Theactualdeviceisvery
similartotheelectricalportionofanelectricgenerator.Itincludesarotor,statorandexciter
justlikeagenerator.Thebigdifferenceisthattheydonothaveanythingthatprovides
mechanicalpowertoproduceMW.Generallyitisthemechanicalpowersourcethatisbyfar
thelargestandmostcomplexpartofageneratingplant.Asynchronouscondenserisa
muchsmallerandsimplerdevice.Theyproviderotatinginertia(thoughmuchlessthana
completegenerator)andtheycanbrieflyprovidefaultcurrentofabout400%ofrated
output.
Itisalsopossibletoprovidevirtualorsyntheticinertiausingelectricalstoragewith
inverters.Thesedevicescanprovidepowertohelpstabilizesystemfrequency.They
operatecontinuously,brieflysupplyingandabsorbingpowertomoderatefrequency
fluctuations.Duringmoreextremefrequencyexcursions,theycanprovidetheirfulloutput.
UVLS

and UFLS systems

TheUVLSandUFLSsystemsneedtobereviewedandrethought.Thefasterfrequencydrop
withhighlevelsofwindandPV,requiresreevaluatingsettingsforUVLSandUFLS.In
general,morecustomerloadwillneedtobeshedtocontrolthefrequencydrop.More
feederswillneedtobecontrolledbytheUFLSandUVLSsystemsandtheywillprobablyneed

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 63 of 69

DGAConsulting

moresteps.Thesestepswillneedtostartatahigherfrequencyandtripmoreloadto
effectivelystopthefrequencydeclineorvoltagecollapse.
TheUVLSandUFLSsystemsalsoneedtobeadjustedfordayandnightoperation.Feeders
withalotofrooftopPVwillneeddifferentsettingsfordayandnighttimes.Thismay
requiredifferenthardware,communicationandcontrolsystemsthannowused.
PresentpracticeandregulationssetthestandardsforconnectingrooftopPV.Theseinclude
requirementsaboutdisconnectingwhenfeederpowerislostandthedelayinrestartingafter
powerisrestoredtothefeeder.ThecoincidentrestartofthesePVunitsisaproblem.A
flexiblerequirementthatallowsrooftopPVtousedifferentrestartdelayswouldreducethe
coincidenceproblem.

Inverter capability and design


Advancesininverterdesigncangivethemfourquadrantcontrol.Thismeansthattheycan
controlMWandvaroutput(allfourquadrants).Thisisabigadvantagebecausethese
inverterscanhelpcontrolvoltageeitherbyraisingorloweringtheirvaroutput.
ThesefourquadrantinvertersarebecomingthestandardfornewwindandlargePV
systemsintheUSandEurope.TheyarenotnowrequiredintheNEM.Theseinverterscost
somewhatmorethantheirsimplerbrethren,butoffervitalfunctionalityastheamountsof
windandPVbecomehigh.Theybecomeevenmorevaluablewhenassociatedwithenergy
storage(discussedbelow).

South Australia interconnections


SouthAustraliaisthepartoftheNEMthathasthemostwindandPV.Thestateis
interconnectedwithVictoriathrougha500/275kVACdoublecircuittransmissionlineat
HeywoodandanHVDCconnectiontoRedCliffs.TheHVDCconnectionislimitedtoabout
220MWand460MWfortheACconnection.(TheAEMOisintheprocessofincreasingtheAC
connectionlimitto650MW.)
TheSouthAustralialoadistypically1,000MWto1,500MW.Installedthermalgenerationis
about2,500MW.Thestatehasabout600MWofPVand1,500MWofwindwithseveral
hundredMWmoreunderconstruction.TherewillbemanyhourswhenthiswindandPV
willalmostcompletelyservetheloadwithnooperatingconventionalgeneration.We
understandthattherehavebeentimeswhentheSouthAustralialoadwasentirelyservedby
renewablegeneration.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 64 of 69

DGAConsulting

ThisisaveryvulnerableinterconnectioninthatthelossoftheACinterconnectionwould
likelycauseastatewideblackoutduringhourswhenwindandsolargenerationwashigh.
StrengtheningtheinterconnectionbetweenSouthAustraliaandVictoriacouldsignificantly
improvethissituation.

Energy storage
EnergystoragemaybethegreatwildcardregardingintegratingwindandPV.
Inexpensiveenergystoragewouldmitigatemostoftheissuesdiscussedabove.Itcouldbe
usedtocontrolrampratesofwindandPV,allowgreatervoltagecontrolandimprovefeeder
stability.
Regulatorscouldrequirestoragefornewwindgeneratorstocontrolrampratesandprovide
someblackstartcapability.Otherstudieshaveshownthat,aswindandsolaraccountfor
morethanabout15%ofpeakload,storageforrampratecontrolshouldberequired.21Other
systemshavefoundthatlimitingrampratesto10%ofratedoutputperminutewas
effective.
Energystoragewouldallowfourquadrantinverterstofunctionunderawiderangeof
conditions.Theycouldprovideramprateandvoltagecontrolasdiscussedabove.They
couldalsobeusedtoimprovestabilitybyquicklyvaryingtheiroutputundertransient
conditions.
Besidesdedicatedenergystorage,customerdeviceslikeelectricvehiclescanprovidemuch
ofthesamebenefits.Itisalsopossiblethatthetransmissionownercouldplaceenergy
storageatkeysubstationstoimprovesystemoperationundernormalandblackstart
conditions.
Ofcourse,thisdependsontheeconomicsofstorage.Technically,however,energystorage
wouldbeveryeffectiveinmitigatingtheimpactofhighwindandPVpenetrationsinthe
supplysystem.Properlydesignedinvertercontrolswouldallowstoragetobeusedas
blackstartcapacitytohelprestorethesystem.

21. P.J.Palermo,Chen,K.,Korinek,D.,SmallIslandExperiencePlanningtoIntegrateLargeAmountsof
WindandSolarGeneration,CigrInternationalSymposium,BestPracticeinTransmissionandDistributionin
aChangingEnvironment,Auckland,September2013

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 65 of 69

DGAConsulting

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 66 of 69

DGAConsulting

CONCLUSIONS
General conclusions regarding major blackouts
1. Outages
a. TransmissionversusgenerationcausestheblackoutsreviewedinTask1
wereallinitiatedbyunexpectedtransmissionevents.Atransmission
failureleadstoaveryrapidincreaseinloadingordeclineinvoltages
leadingtoaseriesofotherequipmenttrips.Theresultisasudden,
usuallylarge,uncontrolledcustomeroutage.
Incontrast,withagenerationshortagethereisusuallyatleastseveral
hoursofadvancewarningofanimpendingshortage.Theseresultin
controlledrotatingcustomeroutages.
b. Notatpeakloadnoneoftheeventsoccurredunderpeakload
conditions.Itiscommontostudypeakconditions,butthesystemisoften
morevulnerableduringoffpeakseasonswhengeneratingunitsarenot
dispatchedoronmaintenance.Therearealsousuallytransmission
maintenanceoutagesthathaveledtoerrorsthatcauseoutages.
c. Inalltheseblackoutsthereweremultiplecontingencies,beyondnormal
operatingandplanningcriteria.
2. Restoration
a. Situationalawarenessisanimportantfirststep.Insomecases,lackof
awarenesswasanimportantfactorthatdelayedrestoration.
b. Whereinterconnectionswereavailable(notHawaiiorSarawak)operators
usedthemearlyinrestoringthesystem.
c. Thereareusuallyelectricalislandsthatmaintainservicethroughthe
blackout.
d. Withwidespreadoutages
o

Usuallysomeequipmentfailsbeyondtheinitiatingcauses;and

Somesetbacksoccurduringrestoration,usuallyduetovoltagecontrol
problems.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 67 of 69

DGAConsulting

General conclusions regarding black-start requirements


1. Energizingpartsofthesystemwithin34hoursiscommon,butfully
restoringthesystemmaytake12hoursormore.
2. Noneofthesystemsrequireapercentageofloadtobereadytoberestored.
Somehavespecificcriticalloads,usuallynuclearpowerstationauxiliary
supplies,thatneedtoberestoredfirstandtobeenergizedin34hours.
3. Multipleblackstartresourcesshouldbeavailable,thoughtheycanbein
neighboringnetworks.
4. Therearefewspecificrequirementsforvoltagecontrol,though,obviously,
voltagesmustbewithinsafelimits.
5. Blackstartstudiesareusuallyconductedfornormalconditions.
6. Noneofthesystemsreviewedhere,considerfueldiversityinidentifying
blackstartgeneration.

Specific comments for the AEMC and NEM situation:


1. Inamajorblackouttherewillbequiteabitofinitialconfusion30minutes
toassessthesituationandforrestorationtobeginiscommon;
2. ThefourhourrequirementfortheSRSobjectiveasshowninFigure1onpage
4isconsistentwithinternationalexperiencewithmajorblackouts;
3. Internationalexperienceshowsthatfullyrestoringcustomerloadcantake12
hoursormorefollowingamajorblackout;
4. Practicingablackstartplan,asdemonstratedbyDetroitEdisonand
ConsumersEnergy,speedsrestoration;
a. Positioningpersonnel;
b. Openingbreakersforacleanstart;and
c. Understandingvoltageissuesinablackstart;
5. Notallplannedgenerationwilloperateasexpected;
6. Therewillusuallybesomeelectricalislandsthatremaininservice;
7. Allgenerators,thatcanhelpfollowingtheblackout,willhelpregardlessof
theSRASstatus;

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 68 of 69

DGAConsulting

8. Controllinghighvoltagesontransmissionlineswillbeacommonproblem,
sooperatorsshouldhaverelevanttraining;
9. TheAEMOmusthaveclearauthoritytosettleanydisputesbetween
stakeholdersduringrestoration;
10. Transmissioninterconnectionsareusedearlyinrestoringthesystem.
11. AstudyofUFLSandUVLSisneededtodeterminetheproperamounts,
frequencysettings,andstepsizes;
12. AsurveyshouldbemadeoffeedersinSouthAustralia,andanyotherplace
withhighPVpenetration,toidentifythosewithsignificantamountsof
rooftopPV;
13. ConsiderrevisingconnectionstandardsforwindandrooftopPVinSouth
Australiaregarding:
a. Restartsettings,
b. Lowvoltageridethrough,and
c. Lowandhighfrequencyridethrough,
d. Storageforrampratecontrol(andblackstartsupport);
14. Consideraddingrequirementsforstorageassociatedwithlargewindfarms
andascommunitystorage;
15. AdditionalinterconnectionsbetweenSouthAustraliaandVictoriashouldbe
studied;
16. Asurveyshouldbemadeofcombustionturbinesandcombinedcyclegas
fueledunitsregardingtheirblackstartcapability;
17. Thereshouldbeadequatecommunicationandcontrolwithwindfarmsso
thatsystemoperatorscanmaintaincontrolforatleastfourhourswithout
externalpower;
18. DevelopmethodstoincludewindinrestorationplansforSouthAustralia;
and
19. WaystomonitorandincluderooftopPVinrestorationshouldbe
investigated.

AEMC Reliability Panel International comparison of major blackouts and restoration

Page 69 of 69

Potrebbero piacerti anche