The power of photographynewfangled digital or old-world filmlies in its ability to remind us of the past as well as to capture the quotidian commute of everyday life. Nabina Das
icture perfect, goes the saying.
Undoubtedly, this sentence is connected to the experience of photography. Armed with a camera, one would look for the perfect subject, the perfect face, the perfect figure, the perfect pose, the perfect landscape or Economic & Political Weekly
EPW
NOVEMBER 19, 2016
vol lI no 47
object of beauty, and so on and so forth. Whether the
so-called perfection is related more to recording or to interventionto hark back to Susan Sontags On Photography must be subjective in these times of split-second digital showcasing. I was never really into photography. Not the actual mechanics of the art where one handles and experiments with cameras, juggles with complex lenses, sorts out the contact sheets, inhabits the darkroom and eventually, delights in creating artworks that are photographs. Shadows, walls, half-light, quick click sounds, peering through a bulbous lens, and the blackness of a shutter or aperture. Anytime I handled a camera very early in my life high school, perhapsit has resurrected images that are only a blur like distant memory. More than a decade ago, when my colleagues and I worked with the very talented and now famous Sudharka Olwe in setting up his exhibition in Delhi, I mainly saw hands, feet, grimy cheeks, swirly dress, rain-muddied pits, and parts of objects such as a broom or a stick as the subject. Not exactly a portrait. That was perhaps my formal introduction to what is art in photography. Before that it was birthday cakes, wedding fashion, festival decoraWhile the old tions and school or passport dourcamera, the unreliable narrator, ness of a face. One evening, visiting Olwe in began to be his developing cubicle, I remember phased out, digital being engulfed by a shock of darkphotography just ness as the rotating door swung changed the way we close. I was blinded for seconds saw ourselves... only to be further cached within a strange red light pouring from nowhere. This was his darkroom. This is where photos lit up for the rest of the world. Im talking of pre-digital times here. My father had an Agfa camera, the one thatd be called old-fashioned today. But that was our memory-keeper. Although even my father was not a photography buff in the strictest sense, he believed in clicking pictures of the family and friends for occasions that would return to conversation in the future. He also liked to take us to the studios and direct the cameraperson there about a particular kind of photoblack-and-white back in those dayshed want to cherish for posterity. My parents with us as babies and young kids, birthdays, cousins, picnics, the family car, the house that my father builtall that encompassed life in general. This photography, again, was event-specific, if we were to look at it from the perspective of todays social-mediagenerated frenzy of clicking any and everything, literally. So, while we have photos from the past to remind ourselves of a certain time and space that we inhabited, there is none almost to capture the quotidian in a commonplace sense of the term. No photos of what we eat on a daily basis, no photos of random objects on our tables, desks, 87
POSTSCRIPT PHOTOGRAPHY
bed, or no photos of our own faces on waking up,
traditional camerawhich we barely took outwe did have wearing make-up, or in shades of sorrow or making faces a disposable one. After about 25 photos, as the reel was to ourselves. developed, the camera was discarded. The new friends were What about selfies then and now, one may ask. pleasantly surprised that in 2002, we asked to borrow their camera for a weekend. In an article titled With Rembrandt, the Selfie Takes That was the onset of winter, our first snow. The day the On New Meaning, The New York Times poses this question: flurries came falling one by one, then rapidly like a featherBut does the act of photographing ourselves necessarily shower, and smothered our tongue and eyes in a rapidly mean that we are entirely solipsistic, or could it help fleeting cold press, I wrote a poem, and we ran about the us learn something valuable about both ourselves and front lawn like children, clicking photographs of the first others?. snowfall. Barely any of it got captured, so ethereal was the The answers can be varied. The articles author, Nina Siegel, event. But we got out again that night to take some more insists that the 17th century Dutch painter can indeed be pictures of the fairy-ghost spectacle. called the original selfie master, with about 80 self-portraits As the cache of digital photography grew, the next year to his credit, from his youth till around age 63. As for our and the next, after I acquired my own digital camera, one current-day selfies, they are far too numerous and random. night I encountered a poem by Barbara Guest: Clearly, none of us selfie practitioners aim to record age and moods as meticulously as Rembrandt. In the past we listened to photographs. They heard our voice speak. Frida Kahlo and her paintings, only too well-known and Alive, active. What had been distance was memory. Dusk came, doted upon, also come to mind. Pushed us forward, emptying the laboratory each night undisturbed by *** Erasure. Click sounds that linger, a scene within a screen, a few In the city of X, they lived together. Always morose, her lips seconds that lend you a possible picture, a blinking green soothed him. The piano was arranged in the old manner, light entered the light, and a little square box flickering to show you the window, street lamps at the single tree. focus. Digitally yours. Emotion evoked by a single light on a subject is not transferable to On a personal level, for me photography literally erupted photographs of the improved city. The camera, once in a volley of snapsand I desist calling them photos until one commented freely amid rivering and lost gutters of treeless parks or avenue. is printed out or downloaded (when I discovered the digital The old camera refused to penetrate the unknown. Its heart was soft, camera). The year was 2002 and fresh off the boat in the unreliable. (excerpted from Photographs) United States (US), my partner and I were discovering the While the old camera, the unreliable narrator, began to be new neighbourhood in Ithaca, New Yorka stunningly phased out, digital photography just changed the way we saw picturesque townwith fresh ourselves and photographed eyes. We were housed inside almost all aspects of our existLAST LINES the campus in an independent encethe seasons, friends, graduate scholar residence neighbours, wayside happenwhich had deer grazing on the ings, personal and community lawns, waterfalls off the roads events, and even inanimate skirting the neighbourhood, objects on walls, floors, corand maple forests winding far ners and all that is unknown. off to where a 24-hour shopping My father, who still clung on arcade stood. to his faithful Agfa, faintly The first friends we made snickered at the momentousthere was a couple from Tainess. Like a modern-day Sontag, wan. Kevin and Elysa were very he surmised that to photograph friendly and more travelled people (or objects) digitally is than we were. And what we to indulge in chronic voyeurididnt have before we met stic relation or to violate the them, was with thema digital subjects. But he happily accepted camera. They took photos at a little digital Canon from us as home, on walks, in the park, a gift the very year he sold off at school, on trips and so on. our house in Assam and They took photos of us too and moved. Erasure. were surprised to know we Nabina Das (nabinamail@yahoo.com), a poet didnt yet photograph digitally. and writer, shuttles between Ithaca, New We told them, other than the York, and New Delhi, India. 88