Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 2 October 2014
Accepted 21 July 2015
Available online 29 July 2015
In this paper, the bending and buckling analyses of shear deformable laminated composite curved beams
with arbitrary lay-up and curvature are presented based on the NURBS-based isogeometric approach.
The equivalent modulus of elasticity is utilized to account for all the material couplings in laminated
composite curved beams and the deepness term is exactly integrated into laminate stiffness parameters.
The displacement eld, geometry and curvature are all together modelled by NURBS. Results of the nondimensional maximum deection and the non-dimensional critical buckling load are compared with
other available results in order to demonstrate the validity of the proposed isogeometric analysis
framework. The buckling response of laminated circular beams under uniform compression and parabolic curved beams subjected to a vertical load uniformly distributed along the span is investigated. The
buckling mode transition phenomenon is exhibited for both types of curved beams.
2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Isogeometric analysis
Laminated composite
Curved beams
1. Introduction
The laminated composite materials are causing the increased
usage in a wide variety of structural applications in the aerospace,
civil construction, marine and offshore industries during the past
four decades. The curved beam made of laminated composite materials are generally used as structural components of light-weight
heavy load bearing elements because of the high strength-toweight and stiffness-to-weight ratios, the ability of being
different strengths in different directions and the nature of being
tailored to satisfy the design requirements of strength and stiffness
in practical designs. For this reason, an accurate prediction for the
structural behaviours of laminated composite curved beams is of
fundamental importance in the design of these structures.
Up to the present, considerable research efforts have been made
for the improved analysis of curved beams made of composite
materials. An extensive survey for theoretical developments and
their applications on vibration of straight and curved composite
beams can be found in the review article by Hajianmaleki and Qatu
(2013). The classical laminated curved beam theory was applied by
Qatu (1992) and Qatu and Elsharkawy (1993) to the vibration
problems of thin arches by using the Ritz method for the simply
219
2. NURBS fundamentals
This section briey represents main features of NURBS. The
details for NURBS-based geometric modelling could be found in
Piegl and Tiller (1997) and Cottrell et al. (2009).
NURBS are derived from B-splines which are piecewise polynomial curves composed of linear combinations of B-spline basis
functions. The primary component of B-spline basis functions is a
knot vector X x1 ; x2 ; ; xnp1 which is a set of non-decreasing
real numbers in the interval [x1,xnp1]. Here, xi 2R is the ith knot, i
is the knot index, i 1,2,,n p 1, p is the polynomial order and
n is the number of basis functions. If all knots are equally spaced,
the knot vector is called uniform. Otherwise, it is a non-uniform
knot vector. If the rst and last knots are repeated (p 1) times,
it is said to be open. The multiplicity of a knot value is the number of
times it appears in the knot vector. The intervals [x1,xnp1] and
[xi,xi1) are called a patch and a knot span, respectively. Based on
the knot vector X, B-spline basis functions Bi,p(x) are dened
recursively starting with piecewise constants (p 0) as follows:
Bi;0 x
1
0
if xi x < xi1 ;
otherwise:
(1)
Bi;p x
xip1 x
x xi
B
x
B
x:
xip xi i;p1
xip1 xi1 i1;p1
(2)
220
B-spline basis functions are Cpk-continuous at a knot of multiplicity k. Basis functions are interpolatory at the ends of the interval and at the knot whose multiplicity is p (C0-continuity). When
p 1, the B-spline basis functions are identical to the standard
Lagrange linear nite element basis functions.
A piecewise polynomial B-spline curve C(x) is dened by a linear
combination of B-spline basis functions and coefcients over the
parametric space (the coefcients are points in d-dimensional
physical space Rd , referred to as control points Pi):
Cx
n
X
Bi;p xPi :
(3)
i1
Pn
Cx Pi1
n
i1
Bi;p xwi
Bi;p xwi
Pi
n
X
Ni;p xPi ;
(4)
i1
ux; z ux zjx;
(5a)
wx; z wx;
(5b)
0 u0 kw;
(6)
g w0 j ku;
(7)
c j0 ;
(8)
Fig. 1. B-spline curve and its corresponding quadratic basis functions with open, nonuniform knot vector X f0; 0; 0; 1; 2; 3; 3; 4; 5; 5; 5g.
1
zc:
1 z=R 0
(9)
Zh=2
Nb
sdz;
(10a)
h=2
Zh=2
szdz;
Mb
(10b)
h=2
Zh=2
Q b
(10c)
tdz;
h=2
t Q 55 f zg;
"
#
5
z 2
1
f z
:
4
h=2
k1 z
8 9 2
A11
<N=
M 4 B11
: ;
0
Q
Mb
k1 z
38 9
0 < 0 =
0 5 c ;
: ;
A55
g
(15)
n0
X
R zk
;
R zk1
bEx ln
bEx
(11a)
(16a)
zk zk1 Rln
k1
R zk
R zk1
;
(16b)
n
o
1
R zk 2 R zk1 2 2Rzk zk1
2
k1
R zk
;
R2 ln
R zk1
D11 R
szdz;
n0
X
k1
k1
z
n0 Z k
X
B11
D11
0
where the A11, B11, D11 and A55 are the stiffness coefcients arising
from the piecewise integration:
B11 R
sdz;
(14)
where s and t are the normal and shear stresses, respectively. The
above equations may be rewritten as:
Nb
(13b)
A11 R
z
n0 Z k
X
221
(11b)
k1
n0
X
bEx
(16c)
Q b
z
n0 Z k
X
k1 z
(11c)
tdz;
k1
Ex
cos4 qk
1
2n
sin4 qk
12 cos2 qk sin2 qk
;
E1
G12
E2
E1
1
2
ZL
N0 Mc Qg dx:
(17)
Writing the strain energy functional for the kth lamina and
summing for the whole laminate yields
ZL h
i
A11 20 2B11 0 c D11 c2 A55 g2 dx:
(18)
(12)
where
is the equivalent modulus; E1 and E2 are the elastic
moduli along directions parallel and perpendicular to bres,
respectively; G12 and n12 are the shear modulus and Poisson ratio,
respectively.
The stressestrain relationship for any layer of the laminate can
be written as:
(16d)
1
U
2
k
Ex
k
Ex ;
n0
5X
4
k
bQ 55 zk zk1 2 ln z3k z3k1 :
4
3h
k1
where n0 is the number of layers and zk and zk1 are the z-coordinates of the top and bottom of the kth layer as shown in
Fig. 2.
It is well known that the issue of couplings appear in laminates
with arbitrary lay-up, thus the in-plane and out-of-plane problems
need to be solved together. However, Hajianmaleki and Qatu (2011,
2012) showed that the purely in-plane behaviours of laminated
curved beams can be accurately achieved with any of stacking
sequence by using equivalent modulus of elasticity of each lamina.
The equivalent modulus of elasticity of each lamina is found based
on the following equation:
A55
(13a)
1
U
2
ZL
w2
w 0
2
j D11 j0
A11 u0
2B11 u0
R
R
u 2
dx:
A55 w0 j
R
(19)
222
V
ZL
1
u 2
px u pz w mj P0 w0
dx:
2
R
(20)
0 dP dU V:
(21)
By substituting Eqs. (19) and (20) into Eq. (21), the following
weak statement is obtained:
ZL
A55 0
u
P
u
px 0 w0
du
w j
R
R
R
R
X Xx
nen
X
n
A11 0 w B11 0
u
u
j pz dw A55 w0 j
R
R
R
R
o
n
o
n
w
u
0
0
0
0
B11 j du A55 w j
m dj A11 u
R
R
o
uo 0 n
w
0
0
0
0
dw B11 u
D11 j dj dx:
P0 w
R
R
(22)
(25)
Ni xui ;
(26)
i1
x0Zxi1
Ni xPi ;
i1
uzux
nen
X
xx
x0 xi
"
dX
dx0
2
dZ
dx0
2 #12
dx0 ;
(27)
00
w0
A
u
P
u
px 0 w0 ;
A11 u0
B11 j 55 w0 j
R
R
R
R
R
(23a)
A11 0 w B11 0
u 0
u 0
u
j A55 w0 j
pz P0 w0
;
R
R
R
R
R
(23b)
00
w0
u
m:
D11 j A55 w0 j
B11 u0
R
R
(23c)
w
B11 j0 ;
du : A11 u0
R
(24a)
u
u
P0 w0 ;
dw : A55 w0 j
R
R
(24b)
w
D11 j0 :
dj : B11 u0
R
(24c)
4. Isogeometric formulation
The NURBS basis functions constructed become nite element
basis functions for the approximate displacement eld. The degreeof-freedoms (DOFs) are the control variables and located at the
control points. The number of nite elements are computed as the
number of non-zero knot spans.
dx
Jx
dx
"
dX
dx
2
dZ
dx
2 #12
ZLe1
(28)
G22
ij
223
(32h)
Le
dX d2 Z dZ d2 X
dx dx2 dx dx2
Rx J 3
!1
:
(29)
K P0 Gu F;
ZLe1
G12
ij
K11
@4 K21
K31
K12
K22
K32
3
2 11
K13
G
K23 5 P0 4 G21
K33
0
G12
G22
0
(31)
where K, G and F are the element stiffness matrix, the element
geometric stiffness matrix and the element force vector, respectively. For each of the possible cases, the certain parameters will not
be needed. For example, in the bending analysis, the axial force P0
and the geometric stiffness matrix G are removed. In case of
buckling analysis, the element force vector F is ignored, then the
model becomes a standard eigenvalue problem. The explicit forms
of K, G and F are given by
Kij11
ZLe1
A
A11 Ni0 Nj0 55
dx;
N
N
i
j
R2
(32a)
(32i)
ZLe1
Fi1
(30)
318 9 8 1 9
< u = <F =
0
0 5A w F2 ;
: ; : 3;
J
F
0
1
Ni Nj0 dx;
R
Le
px Ni dx;
(32j)
pz Ni dx;
(32k)
mNi dx:
(32l)
Le
or
02
ZLe1
Fi2
Le
ZLe1
Fi3
Le
1
x
xi ~x xi1 xi :
2 i1
(33)
Le
Kij22
ZLe1
A11
0 0
N
N
A
N
N
55
i
j
i j dx;
R2
4.2. Renements
(32b)
Le
Kij33
ZLe1
D11 Ni0 Nj0 A55 Ni Nj dx;
(32c)
Le
Kij12
ZLe1
A11 0
A
Ni Nj 55 Ni Nj0 dx;
R
R
(32d)
Le
Kij13
ZLe1
A55
Ni Nj B11 Ni0 Nj0 dx;
R
(32e)
Le
Kij23
ZLe1
B
A55 Ni0 Nj 11 Ni Nj0 dx;
(32f)
Le
5. Numerical results
ZLe1
G11
ij
Le
1
Ni Nj dx;
R2
(32g)
224
rise f. The following material properties are chosen for the composite utilized in the laminate stacking sequences:
Material 1 (Hajianmaleki and Qatu, 2012): E1 138 GPa,
E2 8.96 GPa, n12 0.3, G12 7.1 GPa and G13 G23 3.44 GPa.
Material 2: E1/E2 15, n12 0.25, G12 G13 0.6E2 and
G23 0.5E2.
For convenience, the following non-dimensional terms are used
in the numerical results:
Non-dimensional maximum deection:
.
10wE bh3 p L4
n
1
.
w
3
wE1 bh M0 l2
P cr
.
12P L2 Ebh3
cr
.
12Pcr L2 E2 bh3
(35)
qcr
.
12q l3 Ebh3
cr
.
12qcr l3 E2 bh3
(2012) are also tabulated in Table 1. The 3D nite element solutions were obtained by using the ANSYS nite element code
SOLID46. It is seen that the present results are in good agreement
with both of the solutions given in the study of Hajianmaleki and
Qatu (Hajianmaleki and Qatu, 2012). From Table 1, it is a denite
strength point that renement strategies allow IGA to converge
efciently to the expected results. It can be realized from the rst
line of Table 1 that by using the h-renement, the accuracy of the
present IGA solution increases as the number of elements is
increased from 2 to 64. The more efcient technique, k-renement
creating higher order, higher continuity of NURBS basis functions
gives faster convergence speeds. With the aid of the k-renement,
(36)
(34)
225
Table 1
Convergence rate of non-dimensional maximum deection for the cantilever cross-ply [0/90] laminated circular curved beam under the uniform normal load using NURBSbased h- and k-renement schemes (Material 1 with L/R 1 and L/h 20).
Present IGA
p
Number of elements
2
3
4
5
16
32
64
26.5566
55.0712
55.5220
55.5243
51.9199
55.5108
55.5243
55.5243
55.2914
55.5241
55.5243
55.5243
55.5098
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
55.5234
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
55.5243
Hajianmaleki and
Qatu (2012)
ANSYS
55.52
55.74
the radius-to-thickness ratio a/h 100 is used. The results presented in Table 4 are computed by using four C4 quintic elements.
The present IGA results are compared with the analytical solution
obtained by Lin and Hsieh (2007) in Table 4 for quarter-elliptic
curved beams with various aspect ratios (a/b). A good agreement
between these two solutions can be observed. The maximum difference between the two solutions is 0.3 % for four signicant
gures.
5.2. Buckling analysis
Fig. 4. NURBS curves with control point polygon for two equal element meshes used
to model the circular beam with L/R 1. (a) to (d) Quadratic to quintic NURBS with
maximal Cp1 continuity, (e) to (h) quadratic to quintic NURBS with C0 continuity.
investigating the maximum deection. The schematic of quarterelliptic curved beam is illustrated along with its isogeometric
model of one quintic element in Fig. 6. The major and minor radii of
the quarter-elliptic curved beam are denoted as a and b, respectively. The moment M0 is applied at the free end. Material 2 with
"
#12
l2
dZ dx 2
1
P0 x q0
dx dX
8f
(37)
Table 2
Results of non-dimensional maximum deection using two C0 and Cp1 continuous
NURBS elements generated by p- and k-renements respectively.
Continuity
0
C
Cp1
p2
p3
p4
p5
28.8901
26.5566
55.2332
55.0712
55.5243
55.5220
55.5243
55.5243
Table 3
Non-dimensional maximum deections of cantilever laminated circular curved
beams (Material 1 with L/h 20).
Lay-up
Reference
L/R 0.6
L/R 1
L/R 2
[0/90]s
Present IGA
Hajianmaleki and Qatu (2012)
ANSYS
Present IGA
Hajianmaleki and Qatu (2012)
ANSYS
Present IGA
Hajianmaleki and Qatu (2012)
ANSYS
16.52
16.52
16.51
62.52
62.52
62.63
124.9
124.9
124.1
14.78
14.78
14.81
55.52
55.52
55.74
112.1
112.1
111.3
8.736
8.770
8.789
31.99
32.66
32.37
66.28
66.28
65.66
[0/90]
[45]2
Fig. 5. NURBS meshes of two elements with quintic order and control point polygons
of circular beams. (a) and (b) 2 C4 elements with X f0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 1=2; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1g
and (c) 2 C0 elements with X f0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 1=2; 1=2; 1=2; 1=2; 1=2; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1g.
226
Fig. 6. Schematic of quarter-elliptic curved beam under pure bending and their geometric modelling by quintic NURBS with the knot vector X f0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1g.
Table 4
Non-dimensional maximum deections of cantilever cross-ply [0/90] elliptic beams
under pure bending (Material 2 with l/h 100).
b/a
Present IGA
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
35.57
39.39
45.84
52.71
35.55
39.39
45.86
52.74
1996; Oztrk
et al., 2006; Timoshenko and Gere, 1961), while the
present critical buckling loads are calculated for the curved beams
with very high slenderness to reduce the shear deformation effect
to zero. Isogeometric models of eight C4 quintic elements are use to
produce the results. It is possible to see a good agreement between
the present results with the previous ones. In the buckling analysis
of laminated composite curved beams, all laminated are assumed
to be made of Material 2.
5.2.1. Circular curved beams under uniform compression
The buckling behaviour is investigated for laminated composite
circular curved beams under uniform compression. The convergence study of the non-dimensional critical buckling load P cr for
the clampedeclamped anti-symmetric cross-ply [0/90] laminated
227
Table 5
Non-dimensional critical buckling loads for isotropic circular curved beams (L/R p/3 and L/h 200) and isotropic parabolic curved beams (f/l 0.2 and l/h 200).
Geometry
Buckling load
Reference
Method
Clampedeclamped
Hingedehinged
Circular
P cr
Parabolic
qcr
Present
Oztrk
et al. (2006)
Kang et al. (1996)
Timoshenko and Gere (1961)
Present
Dinnik (1946)
IGA
FEM
DQM
Exact
IGA
e
82.15
82.19
80.42
80.38
103.1
101
39.40
e
38.49
38.38
46.09
45.4
Fig. 9. Convergence rate of the non-dimensional critical load for the clampedeclamped cross-ply [0/90] laminated circular curved beam with respect to the NURBS
order (L/R p/3 and L/h 10).
Table 6
Results of non-dimensional critical buckling load P cr for the clampedeclamped
cross-ply [0/90] laminated circular curved beam using two elements of various orders and continuities of NURBS basis functions (Material 1 with L/R 1 and L/
h 20).
Continuity
p2
p3
p4
p5
C0
C1
C2
C3
C4
362.40
580.87
e
e
e
202.26
211.27
314.35
e
e
182.96
183.29
184.88
205.24
e
181.24
181.25
181.39
181.63
186.58
Table 7
Non-dimensional critical buckling loads P cr of laminated circular curved beams
(Material 2 with L/h 10).
Boundary condition
L/R
[0/90/0]
[0/90]
[45/45]
[0/45/90]s
Clampedeclamped
p/3
2p/3
p
p/3
2p/3
p
359.75
375.45
386.62
280.42
272.79
230.66
181.18
190.27
197.84
108.47
107.63
96.924
98.323
102.93
106.76
52.819
51.471
43.726
301.80
315.26
325.25
217.45
211.66
179.42
Hingedehinged
Fig. 10. Variation of the non-dimensional critical loads with respect to the deepness
ratio for [0/90] laminated circular curved beams (L/h 10).
228
Fig. 11. The anti-symmetric and symmetric buckling mode shapes of [0/90] laminated circular curved beams (L/R p/3 and L/h 10).
f/l
[0/90/0]
[0/90]
[45/45]
[0/45/90]s
Clampedeclamped
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.4
504.69
650.48
710.04
357.88
414.33
407.70
241.10
295.70
304.80
132.46
148.70
141.61
127.38
152.41
153.09
62.827
68.343
62.967
418.11
532.14
571.25
272.72
310.68
300.10
Hingedehinged
Fig. 12. Variation of non-dimensional buckling loads with respect to the rise-to-span
ratio for [0/90] laminated composite parabolic curved beams (l/h 10).
229
Fig. 13. The anti-symmetric and symmetric buckling mode shapes of [0/90] laminated parabolic curved beams (f/l 0.2 and l/h 10).
Fig. 14. Variation of non-dimensional buckling loads with respect to the rise-to-span
ratio for clampedeclamped laminated composite parabolic curved beams with
different lay-ups (l/h 10).
calculation of ABD parameters. The convergence study of the present IGA has been carried out to conrm the efciency and fast
convergence speed of the high-order NURBS elements. The validity
of the proposed framework has been demonstrated through the
comparison of the present results with the other solutions available
in the literature. The non-dimensional critical buckling loads and
the mode shapes of laminated circular curved beams under uniform compression and the parabolic curved beams subjected to
uniformly distributed vertical load along the span have been presented as benchmark solutions. The parametric study on the
buckling of the laminated circular and parabolic curved beams have
been performed. Based on the theoretical developments and numerical results, the following remarks can be made:
(i) In the present isogeometric formulation, the effects of variable curvature and variable axial force are automatically
included through the NURBS-based calculations. This is
different from the previous literature when separate complex equations are used to represent arc length and curvature
of non-circular curved beams. With the new approach, the
Fig. 15. Variation of non-dimensional buckling loads with respect to the rise-to-span
ratio for clampedeclamped [0/90] laminated composite parabolic curved beams
with different length-to-thickness ratios.
230
Fig. 16. Variation of non-dimensional buckling loads with respect to the rise-to-span ratio for clampedeclamped [0/90] laminated composite parabolic curved beams with different
orthotropy ratios (Material 2 with different ratios of E1/E2 and l/h 10).
231
Qatu, M.S., 1992. In-plane vibration of slightly curved laminated composite beams.
J. Sound Vib. 159, 327e338.
Qatu, M.S., Elsharkawy, A.A., 1993. Vibration of laminated composite arches with
deep curvature and arbitrary boundaries. Comput. Struct. 47, 305e311.
Qatu, M.S., 1993. Theories and analyses of thin and moderately thick laminated
composite curved beams. Int. J. Solids Struct. 30, 2743e2756.
Raveendranath, P., Singh, G., Pradhan, B., 2000. Application of coupled polynomial
displacement elds to laminated beam elements. Comput. Struct. 78, 661e670.
Shojaee, S., Valizadeh, N., Izadpanah, E., Bui, T., Vu, T.V., 2012. Free vibration and
bucking analysis of laminated composite plates using the NURBS-based isogeometric nite element method. Compos. Struct. 94, 1677e1693.
Tadjbakhsh, I.G., 1981. Stability and optimum design of arch-type structures. Int. J.
Solids Struct. 17, 565e574.
Thai, C.H., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Nguyen-Thanh, N., Le, T.H., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Rabczuk, T.,
2012. Static, free vibration, and buckling analysis of laminated composite
ReissnereMindlin plates using NURBS-based isogeometric approach. Int. J.
Numer. Methods Eng. 91, 571e603.
Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M., 1961. Theory of Elastic Stability, second ed. McGrawHill, New York.
Trahair, N.S., Papangelis, T.P., 1987. Flexural-torsional buckling of monosymmetric
arches. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 113, 2217e2288.
Vinson, J.R., Sierakowski, R.L., 1986. The Behavior of Structures Composed of
Composite Materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
Yang, Y.B., Kuo, S.R., 1986. Static stability of curved thin-walled beams. J. Eng. Mech.
ASCE 112, 821e841.
Yang, Y.B., Kuo, S.R., 1987. Effect of curvature on stability of curved beams. J. Struct.
Eng. ASCE 113, 1185e1202.
Yang, Y.B., Kuo, S.R., Yau, J.D., 1991. Use of straight-beam approach to study buckling
of curved beams. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 117, 1963e1978.
Yoo, C.H., Kang, Y.J., Davidson, J.S., 1996. Buckling analysis of curved beams by niteelement discretization. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 122, 762e770.