Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
REYNALDO GONZALEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF
THE ESTATE OF NOHEMI
GONZALEZ,
PLAINTIFFS,
V.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, et al., First Amended Complaint , 4:16-cv-03282-DMR
Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, allege the following against Defendants Twitter,
3
NATURE OF ACTION
4
5
6
1.
For years, Defendants have knowingly and recklessly provided the terrorist group
ISIS with accounts to use its social networks as a tool for spreading extremist
7
8
propaganda, raising funds, and attracting new recruits. This material support has
been instrumental to the rise of ISIS and has enabled it to carry out numerous
10
11
12
terrorist attacks, including the November 13, 2015 attacks in Paris where more than
125 were killed, including Nohemi Gonzalez 1.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/14/world/paris-attacks/
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
2.
3
world would not have been possible. According to the Brookings Institution, ISIS
has exploited social media, most notoriously Twitter, to send its propaganda and
5
6
7
8
Using Defendants sites, ISIS has been able to exert an outsized impact on how
the world perceives it, by disseminating images of graphic violence (including the
10
beheading of Western journalists and aid workers) . . . while using social media to
11
attract new recruits and inspire lone actor attacks. According to FBI Director James
12
13
Comey, ISIS has perfected its use of Defendants sites to inspire small-scale
14
individual attacks, to crowdsource terrorism and to sell murder.
15
16
3.
Since first appearing on Twitter in 2010, ISIS accounts on Twitter have grown at an
17
18
19
20
astonishing rate and, until recently, ISIS maintained official accounts on Twitter
unfettered. These official accounts included media outlets, regional hubs and wellknown ISIS members, some with tens of thousands of followers. For example, Al-
21
22
Furqan, ISISs official media wing responsible for producing ISISs multimedia
23
propaganda, maintained a dedicated Twitter page where it posted messages from ISIS
24
25
26
leadership as well as videos and images of beheadings and other brutal forms of
executions to 19,000 followers.
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
4.
Likewise, Al-Hayat Media Center, ISISs official public relations group, maintained
at least a half dozen accounts, emphasizing the recruitment of Westerners. As of June
3
2014, Al-Hayat had nearly 20,000 followers.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Figure 2 Tweet by Al-Hayat Media Center Account @alhayaten Promoting an ISIS Recruitment Video
15
16
5.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Figure 3 ISIS Propaganda Posted on @ISIS_Media_Hub
25
26
27
6.
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
7.
As with Twitter, ISIS has used Google(YouTube) and Facebook in a similar manner.
8.
Plaintiffs claims are based not upon the content of ISIS social media postings, but
3
upon Defendants provision of the infrastructure which provides material support to
ISIS. Furthermore, Defendants profit from ISIS by placing ads on ISIS postings.
5
6
For at least one of the Defendants, Google, revenue earned from advertising is shared
7
8
with ISIS. Lastly, Defendants incorporate ISIS postings to create unique content by
combining the ISIS postings with advertisements selected by Defendants based upon
10
ISIS postings and the viewer looking at the postings and the advertisements.
11
PARTIES
12
13
14
9.
Plaintiff Reynaldo Gonzalez is a citizen of the United States domiciled in the State
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
10. Defendant Twitter, Inc. (Twitter) is a publicly traded U.S. company incorporated
in Delaware, with its principal place of business at 1355 Market Street, Suite 900,
San Francisco, California 94103.
22
23
incorporated in Delaware, with its principal place of business at 1601 Willow Road,
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
12. Defendant Google Inc. (Google) is a publicly traded U.S company incorporated in
3
4
5
6
Mountain View, California, 94043. Google owns the social media site YouTube.
For the purposes of this complaint, Google and YouTube are used interchangeably.
13. Plaintiff is informed that there is an additional heir of Decedent named Beatriz
7
8
Gonzalez who is the mother of the Decedent. Consent was not obtained from this
potential heir to join in this action. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
10
11
12
13
14
14. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
15
1331 and 18 U.S.C. 2333(a) as a civil action brought by a citizen of the United
16
17
18
19
States injured by reason of an act of international terrorism and the estate, survivor,
or heir of a United States citizen injured by reason of an act of international terrorism.
15. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because a substantial
20
21
part of the events giving rise to the claims in this action occurred in this district and
22
23
24
ALLEGATIONS
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
16. ISIS, which stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, is also known as the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), the Islamic State (IS), ad-Dawlah al-
3
4
5
6
7
8
February 2014, however, ISISs tactics had become too extreme for even al
10
11
12
13
18. Since its emergence in Iraq in the early 2000s when it was known as AQI, ISIS has
wielded increasing territorial power, applying brutal, terrifying violence to attain
its military and political goals, including summary executions, mass beheadings,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
19. The United Nations and International NGOs have condemned ISIS for war crimes
and ethnic cleansing, and more than 60 countries are currently fighting to defeat
ISIS and prevent its expansion.
21
22
20. On December 17, 2004, the United States designated ISIS as a Foreign Terrorist
23
Organization (FTO) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as
24
25
26
27
amended.
ISIS is Dependent on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook to Terrorize
ISIS Uses Defendants to Recruit New Terrorists
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
1
2
3
22. ISIS reaches potential recruits by maintaining accounts on Twitter, YouTube, and
Facebook so that individuals across the globe may reach out to them directly. After
6
7
8
the first contact, potential recruits and ISIS recruiters often communicate via
Defendants Direct Messaging capabilities. According to FBI Director James
Comey, [o]ne of the challenges in facing this hydra-headed monster is that if (ISIS)
10
finds someone online, someone who might be willing to travel or kill in place
11
they will begin a twitter direct messaging contact. Indeed, according to the
12
Brookings Institution, some ISIS members use Twitter purely for private messaging
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
or covert signaling.
23. In addition to individual recruitment, ISIS members use Defendants to post
instructional guidelines and promotional videos, referred to as mujatweets.
24. For example, in June 2014, ISIS fighters tweeted guidelines in English targeting
Westerners and instructing them on how to travel to the Middle East to join its fight.
25. That same month, ISIS posted a recruitment video on various social media sites,
21
including Defendants. Although YouTube removed the video from its site, the link
22
remained available for download from Twitter. The video was further promoted
23
24
25
26
26. ISIS also posted its notorious promotional training video, Flames of War, narrated
in English, in September 2014. The video was widely distributed on Twitter through
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
ISIS sympathizers. After joining ISIS, new recruits become propaganda tools
3
4
27. For example, in May 2013, a British citizen who publicly identified himself as an
ISIS supporter tweeted about his touchdown in Turkey before crossing the border
5
6
into Syria to join ISIS in the fight against the Syrian regime. And in December
2013, the first Saudi Arabian female suicide bomber to join ISIS in Syria tweeted
her intent to become a martyr for the ISIS cause, as she embarked for Syria.
28. As another example, two Tunisian girls, ages 19 and 21, were lured by ISISs use of
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Hussain, was using Facebook to recruit terrorists to launch attacks in the U.K. 3
30. After kidnapping and murdering Ruqia Hassan Mohammad, a female journalist and
activist, ISIS used her account to lure others into supporting ISIS 4.
31. Through its use of Defendants sites, ISIS has recruited more than 30,000 foreign
recruits since 2013, including some 4,500 Westerners and 250 Americans.
ISIS Uses Defendants to Fund Terrorism
25
26
27
2 http://www.teenvogue.com/story/isis-recruits-american-teens
3 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/british-isis-leader-using-facebook-7545645?
4 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ruqia-hassan-mohammed-the-activist-and-citizen-journalist-thatisis-murdered-and-then-posed-as-for-a6798111.html
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
32. ISIS also uses Defendants to raise funds for its terrorist activities.
33. According to David Cohen, the U.S. Treasury Departments Under Secretary for
3
4
5
6
7
8
34. The Financial Action Task Force confirms that individuals associated with ISIL
have called for donations via Twitter and have asked the donors to contact them.
10
These tweets even promote donation tiers. One ISIS-linked cleric with the Twitter
11
account @Jahd_bmalk, for instance, sought donations for weapons with the slogan
12
13
Participate in Jihad with your Money. The account tweeted that if 50 dinars is
14
donated, equivalent to 50 sniper rounds, one will receive a silver status. Likewise,
15
if 100 dinars is donated, which buys eight mortar rounds, the contributor will earn
16
the title of gold status donor. According to various tweets from the account, over
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
35. A similar Twitter campaign in the spring of 2014 asked followers to support the
11
Mujahideen with financial contribution via the following reliable accounts and
12
13
14
36. In its other Twitter fundraising campaigns, ISIS has posted photographs of cash
15
gold bars and luxury cars that it received from donors, as well as weapons
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
11
37. As discussed more fully below, YouTube approves of ISIS videos allowing for ads
to be placed with ISIS videos. YouTube earns revenue from these advertisements
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
39. ISIS also uses Defendants sites to spread propaganda and incite fear by posting
19
20
21
22
23
40. Through Defendants sites, ISIS disseminates its official media publications as well
as posts about real-time atrocities and threats to its perceived enemies.
41. In October 2013, ISIS posted a video of a prison break at the Abu Ghraib prison in
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
12
42. In November 2013, an ISIS-affiliated user reported on Twitter that ISIS had killed a
3
4
5
6
to depict Abu Dahr, identified as the suicide bomber that attacked the Iranian
embassy.
43. In December 2013, an ISIS-affiliated user tweeted pictures of what it described as
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
head perched on his legs. The accompanying tweet read: This is our ball . . . it
has skin on it. ISIS then hashtagged the tweet with the handle #WorldCup so that
the image popped up on the feeds of millions following the soccer challenge in
14
15
16
Brazil.
45. On July 25, 2014, ISIS members tweeted photos of the beheading of around 75
17
18
19
20
Syrian soldiers who had been captured during the Syrian conflict.
46. In August 2014, an Australian member of ISIS tweeted a photo of his seven-yearold son holding the decapitated head of a Syrian soldier.
21
22
47. Also in August 2014, ISIS member Abu Musaab Hafid al-Baghdadi posted photos
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
13
gruesome photos of dead and seriously injured Allied soldiers. Some of the photos
depicted U.S. marines hung from bridges in Fallujah, human heads on spikes and the
3
4
5
6
twin towers in flames following the 9/11 attacks. Other messages included direct
threats to attack U.S. embassies around the world, and to kill all Americans wherever
you are.
7
8
9
49. Various ISIS accounts have also tweeted pictures and videos of the beheadings of
Americans James Foley, Steven Sotloff, and Peter Kassig.
10
11
12
13
50. To keep its membership informed, in April 2014, ISIS created an Arabic-language
Twitter App called The Dawn of Glad Tidings, or The Dawn, which posts tweets
to thousands of users accounts, the content of which is controlled by ISISs social
14
15
media operation. The tweets include hashtags, links, and images related to ISISs
16
activities. By June 2014, the app reached a high of 40,000 tweets in one day as ISIS
17
18
19
20
21
22
that they trend on Twitter, meaning a wider number of users are exposed to the tweets.
23
One such campaign dubbed a Twitter storm, took place on June 8, 2014, and led to
24
25
a surge in followers.
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
14
52. In 2014, propaganda operatives from ISIS posted videos of photojournalist John
Cantile and other captors on both Twitter and YouTube 5. These operatives used
3
4
5
6
various techniques to ensure that ISIS posting was spread using Defendants sites.
Defendants Knowingly Permit ISIS to Use Their Social Network
The Use of Twitter by Terrorists Has Been Widely Reported
7
8
9
10
53. For years, the media has reported on the ISISs use of Defendants social media
sites and their refusal to take any meaningful action to stop it.
54. In December 2011, the New York Times reported that the terrorist group al- Shabaab,
11
12
best known for chopping off hands and starving their own people, just opened a
13
Twitter account and have been writing up a storm, bragging about recent attacks and
14
15
16
55. That same month, terrorism experts cautioned that Twitter terrorism was part of
17
an emerging trend and that several branches of al Qaeda were using Twitter to
18
19
20
56. On August 18, 2013, USA Today reported that the Twitter feed of pro-Islamic State
21
of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), a group of militant extremists linked to al-Qaeda,
22
showed posters, which said: We are avenging our Sunni brothers . . . leave now or
23
face death.
24
25
26
27
57. On October 14, 2013, the BBC issued a report on The Sympatic, one of the most
important spokesmen of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant on the social contact
5 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/24/isis-twitter-youtube-message-social-media-jihadi
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
15
website Twitter who famously tweeted: I swear by God that with us there are
mujahideen who are not more than 15 years old!! Where are the men of the [Arabian]
58. On October 31, 2013, Agence France-Presse reported on an ISIS video depicting a
5
6
7
8
9
prison break at Abu Ghraib and the execution of Iraqi army officers that was
posted on jihadi forums and Twitter.
59. On June 19, 2014, CNN reported on ISISs use of Twitter to raise money for weapons,
food, and operations. The next day, Seth Jones, Associate Director of International
10
11
Security and Defense Policy Center, stated in an interview on CNN that Twitter was
12
widely used by terrorist groups like ISIS to collect information, fundraise and recruit.
13
14
15
60. On August 21, 2014, after ISIS tweeted out the graphic video showing the
16
beheading of American James Foley, the Wall Street Journal warned that Twitter
17
18
19
61. In September 2014, Time Magazine quoted terrorism expert Rita Katz, who
20
observed that [f]or several years, ISIS followers have been hijacking Twitter to
21
freely promote their jihad with very little to no interference at all. . . . Twitters
22
lack of action has resulted in a strong, and massive pro-ISIS presence on their
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
16
62. On January 10, 2012, CBC News Released an article stating that Facebook is being
used by terrorist organizations for recruitment and to gather military and political
3
4
5
6
intelligence "Many users don't even bother finding out who they are confirming as
'friend' and to whom they are providing access to a large amount of information on
their personal life. The terrorists themselves, in parallel, are able to create false
7
8
9
profiles that enable them to get into highly visible groups," he said 6.
63. On January 10, 2014, the Washington post released an article titled Why arent
10
11
12
13
YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter doing more to stop terrorists from inciting
violence? 7
64. In June 2014, the Washington times reported that Facebook is refusing to take down
14
15
a known ISIS terror group fan page that has nearly 6,000 members and adoringly
16
quotes Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, founder of al-Qaeda in Iraq who was killed by U.S.
17
18
19
20
forces in 2006.8
65. On August 21, 2014, the anti-defamation league explained that ISIS supporters on
Twitter have not only promoted ISIS propaganda (primarily in English) but has also
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
6 http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/terrorist-groups-recruiting-through-social-media-1.1131053
7 https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/07/10/farrow-why-arent-youtube-facebook-and-twitter-doingmore-to-stop-terrorists-from-inciting-violence/
8 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/husain-facebook-refuses-take-down-isis-terror-grou/
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
17
pages as they are removed by Facebook for content violation) that do the same. 9
3
4
5
6
66. On October 28, 2015, at the Radicalization: Social Media And The Rise Of Terrorism
hearing it was reported that Zale Thompson who attacked four New York City Police
Officers with an ax posted on Facebook Which is better, to sit around and do nothing
7
8
9
or to wage jihad.10
67. At this same hearing, it was also reported that in September 2014 Alton Nolen, a
10
11
12
13
convert to Islam and ex-convict who had just been fired from his job at a food
processing plant, entered his former workplace and beheaded an employee with a
knife. This attack combines elements of workplace violence and terrorism. Nolen had
14
15
16
page. 11
17
18
19
20
68. On November 11, 2015, it was reported that one of the attackers from a terrorist bus
attack two weeks prior was a regular on Facebook, where he had already posted a
will for any martyr. Very likely, they made use of one of the thousands of posts,
21
22
manuals and instructional videos circulating in Palestinian society these last few
23
24
25
26
27
9 http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/international-extremism-terrorism/c/isis-islamic-state-socialmedia.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/#.Vzs0xfkrIdU
10 https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/10-28-2015-Natl-Security-Subcommittee-Hearing-onRadicalization-Purdy-TRC-Testimony.pdf
11 https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/10-28-2015-Natl-Security-Subcommittee-Hearing-onRadicalization-Gartenstein-Ross-FDD-Testimony.pdf
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
18
chart of the human body with advice on where to stab for maximal damage. 12
3
4
5
6
69. On December 4, 2015, The Counter Extremism Project released a statement stating
that Todays news that one of the shooters in the San Bernardino attack that killed
14 innocent people pledged allegiance to ISIS in a Facebook posting demonstrates
7
8
once again that the threat of ISIS and violent Islamist extremist ideology knows no
borders. 13
10
11
12
13
70. On April 8, 2016, the Mirror reported that Jihadi fighters in the Middle East are
using Facebook to buy and sell heavy duty weaponry and that Fighters in ISISlinked regions in Libya are creating secret arms bazaars and hosting them on the
14
15
massive social network. Because of Facebook's ability to create groups and to send
16
secure payments through its Messenger application, it works as the perfect platform
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
12 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/03/opinion/the-facebook-intifada.html?_r=1
13 http://www.counterextremism.com/press/counter-extremism-project-releases-statement-news-san-bernardino-shooterpledgedallegiance?utm_content=buffer38967&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer#sthash.iJj
hU3bF.dpuf
14 http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/isis-terrorists-use-facebook-buy-7713893
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
19
72. On July 7, 2014, CBS Local reported that militants post beheading videos on sites
like Googles YouTube, giving an image the chance to go viral before being shut
3
4
5
6
down. 15
73. On March 1, 2015, the New York Times reported that some of the most
sophisticated recruitment efforts by the Islamic State, particularly online, are geared
7
8
toward Westerners, featuring speakers who are fluent in English. For instance, in a
video available on YouTube and Facebook, the Islamic State has manipulated the
10
11
12
13
video game Grand Theft Auto, making the games officers look like New York police
officers and showing how a militant could attack them.16
74. On March 3, 2015, CNN Money reported that YouTube was placing advertisements
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
15 http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/07/24/should-twitter-facebook-be-held-liable-for-a-terrorist-attack/
16 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/01/nyregion/brooklyn-arrests-highlight-challenges-in-fighting-of-isis-and-knownwolves.html?_r=0
17 http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/03/technology/isis-ads-youtube/
18 http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/239510/beer-ads-keep-showing-up-on-isis-youtube-videos/
19 http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/ads-shown-isis-videos-youtube-catch-companies-guard-n320946
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
20
like Procter and Gamble, Anheuser-Busch, and Toyota have all been forced to make
3
4
5
6
apologies after ads for their products started rolling in front of ISIS recruiting videos
which have been cropping up ever more frequently on the site. 20
78. On August 6, 2015, Journal-Neo.org reported that The well-known online video
7
8
9
platform YouTube serves as the main media platform of these radical fighters. 21
79. On April 28, 2015, MusicTechPolicy.com reported that the Islamic State has released
10
11
a new YouTube video showcasing recent battles in the Al Sufiyah area of eastern
12
Ramadi. Approximately 30 Iraqi police have been killed and around 100 more have
13
14
15
80. In March 2016, the morning consult reported that a video ad from a pro-Ted Cruz
16
Super PAC (Reigniting the Promise PAC) was the inadvertent prelude to a video
17
18
19
20
produced by an official media outlet of the Islamic State terror group. The outlet, AlHayat Media Center, produces propaganda for ISIS. Digital Citizens Alliance says
its likely an ISIS supporter uploaded that video.
21
22
23
81. In March 2016 the digital citizens alliance found several examples of campaign ads
placed on ISIS videos 23.
24
25
26
27
20 http://newmediarockstars.com/2015/03/advertisers-apologize-for-ads-shown-on-isis-youtube-videos/
21 http://journal-neo.org/2015/06/08/hi-tech-tools-of-isil-propaganda/
22 https://musictechpolicy.com/2015/04/28/live-from-youtubeistan-google-still-providing-material-support-for-isis/
23 https://media.gractions.com/314A5A5A9ABBBBC5E3BD824CF47C46EF4B9D3A76/cbb90db1-b1aa-4b29-a4d55d6453acc2cd.pdf
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
21
82. Throughout this period, both the U.S. government and the public at large have urged
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
anti-terrorism laws.
84. In December 2012, several members of Congress wrote to FBI Director Robert
10
11
12
13
Mueller asking the Bureau to demand that the Twitter block the accounts of various
terrorist groups.
85. In a committee hearing held on August 2, 2012, Rep. Ted Poe, chair of the House
14
15
16
terrorist using Twitter, Twitter has not shut down or suspended a single account.
17
18
19
20
Terrorists are using Twitter, Rep. Poe added, and [i]t seems like its a violation of
the law. In 2015, Rep. Poe again reported that Twitter had consistently failed to
respond sufficiently to pleas to shut down clear incitements to violence by terrorists.
21
22
86. Recently, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has urged Defendants to
23
become more aggressive in preventing ISIS from using its network. Resolve means
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
22
3
4
87. On January 7, 2016, White House officials announced that they would hold high-
from using their services. The primary purpose is for government officials to press
the biggest Internet firms to take a more proactive approach to countering terrorist
messages and recruitment online. . . . That issue has long vexed U.S.
9
10
11
propaganda, cultivate followers and steer them toward committing violence. But
12
the companies have resisted some requests by law-enforcement leaders to take action
13
. . .
14
15
16
17
18
19
Biz Stone and Twitter General Counsel Alex Macgillivray wrote: We dont always
20
agree with the things people choose to tweet, but we keep the information flowing
21
22
23
90. On June 20, 2014, Twitter founder Biz Stone, responding to media questions about
24
ISISs use of Twitter to publicize its acts of terrorism, said, [i]f you want to create a
25
26
27
platform that allows for the freedom of expression for hundreds of millions of people
around the world, you really have to take the good with the bad.
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
23
approach, telling the press, Twitter users around the world send approximately 500
3
4
5
6
million tweets each day, and we do not monitor them proactively. The Twitter
Rules reiterated that Twitter do[es] not actively monitor and will not censor user
content, except in exceptional circumstances. In February 2015, Twitter confirmed
7
8
that it does not proactively monitor content and that it reviews only that content which
10
11
92. Most technology experts agree that Defendants could and should be doing more to
12
stop ISIS from using its social network. When Twitter says, We cant do this, I
13
dont believe that, said Hany Farid, chairman of the computer science department at
14
15
system with Microsoft, says that the same technology could be applied to terror
16
17
18
19
Unless the companies have decided that they just cant be bothered.
20
21
22
93. According to Rita Katz, the director of SITE Intelligence Group, Twitter is not doing
enough. With the technology Twitter has, they can immediately stop these accounts,
23
but they have done nothing to stop the dissemination and recruitment of lone wolf
24
terrorists.
25
26
94. Even when Defendants shut down an ISIS-linked account, they do nothing to stop it
from springing right back up. According to the New York Times, the Twitter account
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
24
of the pro- ISIS group Asawitiri Media has had 335 accounts. When its account
@TurMedia333 was shut down, it started @TurMedia334. When that was shut down,
account after the last one is suspended does not seem as if it would require artificial
5
6
intelligence to spot. Each of these accounts also used the same user photograph of a
bearded mans face over and over again. In the hours after the shooting attack in San
we have already arrived with our soldiers. Decide how to be your end, with knife or
10
11
bomb.
12
95. Using this simplistic naming scheme is critical to ISISs use of social media. Without
13
a common prefix, it would be difficult for followers of ISIS accounts to know the
14
15
16
17
18
19
created. Yet Defendants have failed to implement such a basic account detection
20
methodology.
21
22
97. Furthermore, ISIS keeps track of the followers of each account. Once an account is
23
deleted by one of Defendants and then regenerated, ISIS uses a bot to contact each of
24
its followers asking them to connect. This allows ISIS to reconstitute the connections
25
26
27
for each account very quickly. Defendants could easily detect such activity but chose
not to.
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
25
98. Although Defendants proclaim that they do take accounts down including those of
ISIS, Defendants do nothing to keep those accounts down. ISIS and other nefarious
3
4
5
6
groups are dependent upon having a social media network from which to collect
money and conduct terrorist operations including recruitment and radicalization.
99. The following example illustrates how Defendants allow ISIS to quickly construct
7
8
networks of followers. Below is a posting from twitter captured on June 20, 2016.
The individual is named DriftOne00146 and he proudly proclaims that this is the
10
11
12
146th version of his account. With only 11 tweets, this individual is followed by 349
followers. This is very suspicious activity.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Figure 7: DriftOne00146 posting 06/20/2016
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
26
1
2
100. The very next day, this individual now has 547 followers with only 3 additional
tweets.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
101. The next morning, this individuals account was taken down by Twitter. That
afternoon, he was back up as DriftOne0147 with 80 followers.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
102. The very next week on June 28, 2016, the same individual was back up as
15
DriftOne150. Most disturbing is that his posting of #Bangladesh and #Dhaka just
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
103. The day after the attacks, he is now DriftOne0151 and he posts pictures of those
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
104. What the above example clearly demonstrates is that there is a pattern that is easily
detectable without reference to the content. As such, a content-neutral algorithm
could be easily developed that would prohibit the above behavior. First, there is a
text prefix to the username that contains a numerical suffix. When an account is
20
21
taken down by a Defendant, assuredly all such names are tracked by Defendants. It
22
would be trivial to detect names that appear to have the same name root with a
23
24
25
26
numerical suffix which is incremented. By limiting the ability to simply create a new
account by incrementing a numerical suffix to one which has been deleted, this will
disrupt the ability of individuals and organizations from using Defendants networks
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
impinge upon the utility of Defendants sites. There is no legitimate purpose for
allowing the use of fixed prefix/incremental numerical suffix names. Preventing the
use of these names once a similarly named account would not place a significant
7
8
burden on Defendants to implement nor would it place any chilling effect on the
10
11
12
13
106. Sending out large numbers of requests to connect with friends/followers from a
newly created account is also suspicious activity. As shown in the DriftOne
example above, it is clear that this individual must be keeping track of those
14
15
previously connected. When an account is taken down and then re-established, the
16
individual then uses an automated method to send out requests to all those members
17
18
19
20
previously connected. Thus, accounts for ISIS and others can quickly reconstitute
after being deleted. Such activity is suspicious on its face.
107. Clearly, it is not normal activity for a newly created account to send out large
21
22
numbers of requests for friends and followers immediately after creation. It is further
23
unusual for those connections requests to be accepted in a very short period of time.
24
25
26
27
As such, this activity would be easy to detect and could be prohibited by Defendants
in a content-neutral manner as the content is never considered; only the conduct.
108. Furthermore, limiting the rapidity with which a newly created account can send
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
31
3
4
5
6
7
8
109. Because the suspicious activity used by ISIS and other nefarious organizations
engaged in illegal activities is easily detectable and preventable and that Defendants
10
11
12
13
are fully aware that these organizations are using their networks to engage in illegal
activity demonstrates that Defendants are acting knowingly and recklessly allowing
such illegal conduct. ISIS is dependent on using social media to conduct its terrorist
14
15
operations. Limiting ISIS ability to rapidly connect and reconnect to supports Thus,
16
Defendants knowing and reckless conduct provides materials support to ISIS and
17
18
19
20
21
22
accounts are still easily found on Twitter.com. To this day, Twitter also permits
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
32
111. On November 17, 2015, the hacking group Anonymous took down several thousand
ISIS Twitter accounts. That an external third party could identify and disrupt ISIS
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Twitter accounts confirms that Twitter itself could have prevented or substantially
limited ISIS use of Twitter.
Twitter, Facebook, and Google Profit from allowing ISIS to use their services
112. Astonishingly, Defendants routinely profit from ISIS. Each Defendant places ads on
ISIS postings and derives revenue for the ad placement.
113. These ads are not placed randomly by Defendants. Instead, they are targeted to the
11
12
13
14
15
viewer using knowledge about the viewer as well as information about the content
being viewed. The following sites for each Defendant show how targeting works:
https://business.twitter.com/en/targeting.html,
https://www.facebook.com/business/a/online-
16
sales/ad-targeting-details,
17
https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.youtube.com/en//yt/advertise/medias/pdfs/target
18
19
ing-onesheeter-en.pdf.
20
21
are no longer simply passing through the content of third parties. Defendants are
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
33
115. Not only does Defendant Google profit from ISIS, it shares some of those revenues
with ISIS. In order for ads to appear associated with a posting on a YouTube video,
3
4
5
the poster must create a Google AdSense account. The poster must the register the
account for monetization 24.
6
7
8
9
10
116. According to Google, each video must be approved in order for ads to be placed.
These videos must meet Googles terms of service.
11
12
13
14
117. Videos that are approved generate revenue for both the poster and for Google.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Therefore, according to its terms, if there are ads associated with a YouTube video,
the video has been approved by Google, Google is earning revenue from each view
of that video, and Google is sharing revenue with the poster.
118. With respect to ISIS, Google has placed ads on ISIS postings.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
119. Given that ad placement on videos requires Googles specific approval of the video
16
according to Googles terms and conditions, any video which is associated with
17
18
19
20
21
120. Because ads appear on the above video posted by ISIS, this means that Google
specifically approved the video for monetization, Google earned revenue from each
view of this video, and Google shared the revenue with ISIS. As a result, Google
22
23
24
25
26
example, a view of the account of DJ Nasheed on May 17, 2016, shows that Twitter
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
35
placed an ad for OneNorth for their M.E.A.N. Stack offering. As such, Twitter
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Figure 14 ISIS post on Facebook with add placed by Facebook
13
14
15
16
17
18
123. As such, Facebook provides material support to ISIS and is compensated for the
effort.
124. Thus, not only does each Defendant provide material support to ISIS by allowing
19
ISIS to make use of their social media sites, each Defendant derives revenue from
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
37
125. Nohemi Gonzalez was a student at California State University, Long Beach studying
industrial design. At the time of her death, Nohemi was spending a semester in Paris,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
126. On Friday, November 13, 2015, Nohemi and some friends were enjoying a night in
Paris and were dining at a bistro La Belle Equipe located on Rue de Charrone.
Shortly after arriving, militants sprayed bullets into the bistro. Nohemi was struck
and killed.
20
21
127. In all, 130 people were killed and 368 people were injured in six coordinated attacks.
22
128. Shortly after the coordinated Paris attacks, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attacks:
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
38
1
2
129. The murder of Nohemi by an ISIS operative has caused Plaintiff severe mental
anguish, extreme emotional pain, and suffering, and the loss of Nohemis society,
5
6
7
8
9
10
Defendants Material Support of ISIS has a Direct Connection to the November 13,
2015 Paris Attack and is a Proximate Cause
11
12
13
130. The rise of ISIS has been substantial fueled through their use of Defendants social
media sites which have been used by ISIS for fundraising activities. Furthermore, as
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
132. Without the ability to use Defendants sites as tools to conduct terrorist operations,
ISIS would have substantially less funding, substantially less exposure, and would
not be able to recruit as many operatives.
23
24
133. Money raised through the use of Defendants sites was used by ISIS to conduct
25
26
27
terrorist operations including the 2015 Paris attacks leading to the Death of Naomi
Gonzalez.
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
39
134. Individuals recruited by ISIS through the use of Defendants sites allowed ISIS to
conduct terrorist operations, including the 2015 Paris attacks leading to the death of
3
4
5
Nohemi Gonzalez.
135. But for ISIS use of Defendants sites to raise funds, recruit, and conduct terrorist
6
7
9
10
136. When individuals look at a page on one of Defendants sites that contains postings
11
12
13
14
and advertisements, the page has been created by Defendants. In other words, a
viewer does not simply see a posting. Nor does the viewer see just an advertisement.
Defendants create a composite page of content from multiple sources.
15
16
137. Defendants create this page by selecting which advertisement to match with the
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
and viewers.
138. As discussed above, Defendants tout the ability to target advertisements as a benefit
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
40
139. Although Defendants have not created the posting nor have they created the
3
4
5
advertisement to combine with the posting with knowledge about the viewer.
140. Thus, Defendants have incorporated content from others into Defendant created
6
7
with certain postings for specific viewers means that Defendants are not simply
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
advertisements matched to the viewer and ISIS postings to create new content for
which Defendants have earned revenue. ISIS has received material support as
described above allowing them to conduct terrorist operations.
16
17
18
COUNT I
20
21
142. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of the foregoing
19
22
23
24
25
26
143. The services and support that Defendants purposefully, knowingly or with willful
blindness provided to ISIS constitute material support to the preparation and carrying
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
41
out of acts of international terrorism, including the attack in which Nohemi Gonzalez
was killed.
3
4
5
144. Defendants provision of material support to ISIS was a proximate cause of the
injury inflicted on Plaintiff.
6
7
8
145. By virtue of its violations of 18 U.S.C. 2339A, Defendants are liable pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 2333 for any and all damages that Plaintiff has sustained.
9
10
11
COUNT II
13
14
146. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of the foregoing
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
147. The services and support that Defendants purposefully, knowingly or with willful
blindness provided to ISIS constitute material support to a Foreign Terrorist
Organization (FTO) in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2339B.
21
22
23
148. Defendants provision of material support to ISIS was a proximate cause of the
injury inflicted on Plaintiff.
24
25
26
149. By virtue of its violations of 18 U.S.C. 2339B, Defendants are liable pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 2333 for any and all damages that Plaintiff has sustained.
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
d) Enter judgment against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff for any and all costs
sustained in connection with the prosecution of this action, including attorneys
fees, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2333;
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
44
VERIFICATION
1
2
I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I have read the foregoing complaint, and
3
4
5
6
7
8
reason, I am making this verification for and on behalf of the Plaintiffs. I am informed and
believe on that ground allege the matters stated in said document are true.
10
11
12
13
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on December 2, 2016, at San Diego, CA.
14
15
16
Respectfully Submitted,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gonzalez v. Twitter, Google, and Facebook, First Amended Complaint for Damages
45