Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2.3
Customer
Needs
Analysis
(Kano
Analysis) ......................................... 8
Part 3. Design Requirements ..............................................................................
13
3.1 Translating Customer Needs into Design Requirements (QFD) .......
13
3.2 Design Risk Analysis (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) ................
15
Part 4. Supplier Selection and Evaluation .........................................................
17
4.1 Identifying Components ......................................................................
17
4.2 Developing Supplier Selection Criteria ...............................................
17
4.3 Constructing and Using a Supplier Selection System ......................
17
4.4 Supplier Evaluation Report ..................................................................
19
Part 5. Statistical Process Control (SPC) .............................................................
20
1
...........................................................................................................
32
Part 1: Introduction
This assignment will be specifically focused on a flight simulator as a product. The
simulator will be operated as a training device in the aviation industry as well as an
entertainment product (flight experience) for general public on a commercial level.
A flight simulator is a system that replicates the experience of piloting an aircraft in
the most accurate and realistic way as possible. It is an identical copy of the real
size cockpit stablished on a hydraulic platform which faithfully reproduces the
commands and controls of an aircraft, including take-off and landing in multiple
airports and meteorology.
The simulator is connected to a computer which keeps all parameters described
above. The cockpit has a screen that displays everything what is happening
around and a system control program that generates the most diverse conditions
and even special situations. Through the screen, the pilot can see virtual images
corresponding to the pre-planned scenarios in the simulator session.
Flight simulators are mainly used worldwide for the training of pilots in the aviation
industry. In our particular case, we will focus on the flight simulator as a key tool for
the training of airplane pilots but also we will add the concept of flight simulator as
a package of entertainment for general public in order to provide customers a total
immersion experience as close as possible to fly in real time.
There are different types of simulators. Simulators used for training commercial
pilots have a higher level of realism and the only difference they have with the
cockpit of a real airplane is that the simulator does not have an oxygen supply
system. They also require official approval of the competent authority for the
training of flight crews. (Actualidad.rt.com)
Our simulator will be based on the Boeing 737, the biggest selling jet airliner ever
built.
3
Surround stereo sound system with seat shakers including realistic sounds and
vibrations
Global scenery and navigation database including over 24,000 airports and cities
globally
Stakeholder
Internal
Executive Team
Engineering Department
Maintenance & Support Team
Store Manager
External
Universities, Flight Schools & Airlines
Clients
Competitors
Surveys
Customer Interviews
Focus groups
Testimonials
Market trend analysis
Competition
Surveys
The surveys provide interesting information about our target and product to help us
to determine our behaviour and to establish positive relationships with the
customer. We need to know the feedback of our customers about our product as
we value what they think. In this way they will also create a confidence level
toward us.
Depending on the goal, we will formulate the questions in one way or another.
Accordingly, we will obtain more detailed product information (for example, how
satisfied or dissatisfied they are with our simulator, if they would recommend it to
another friend or colleague, how they would rate the quality of the simulator, etc.)
or more generic about our business needs (like if they have previously had a
similar experience, how much they would pay for that, if they would give it as a
gift...).
In our case, we will launch a survey by personalized email using a simple online
form easy to reply to our existing customers in order to know their overall
satisfaction with our product and customer service as well as support service in
general. The results will be key to observe if we are on the right way or instead we
must change the way we work, modify our behaviour based on these results, meet
new needs, etc.
Customer Interviews
Customer interview is one of the tools most common and useful in obtaining or
verify the information we are interested in quantitative measurement. They provide
an opportunity to get in-depth information from customer. (NPD-Solutions.com)
The interview consists of a battery of questions the interviewer asks in writing, by
phone or in person the interviewee. There are different types of interviews
(informal in-depth...). Depending on the purpose, it will be held one-to-one or
group interview.
The interviewer plays the main role at this stage. He must perform a previous
research on the interviewer and write a script of questions with a list of alternative
issues that may arise during the interview. Another important aspect to consider is
the preparation process. First, we must investigate the situation and then identify
respondents (one-by-one or group interview). Having decided this, prepare the aim
and content and plan the place and time.
During the interview, the interviewer should show objectively and impartially and
ensure that the interviewer is answering the questions directly without diverting
attention to other matters. After the interview, the interview notes and any
recordings will need to be summarized and distilled into a set of distinct customer
needs. (NPD-Solutions.com)
Focus groups
A focus group is a qualitative research tool based on a face to face meeting with a
previously selected sample of customers who share their ideas about their needs
and perspectives on a particular subject. This is a group experience where
participants explain not only what they think about the product but also how and
why they think that way, trying to seek improvements. It's a great way to hear
feedback from our customers first hand.
The group should be small -usually is composed between 5 and 10 people(Goldman AE & Mac Donald SS, 1987) so that everyone has the opportunity to
share their ideas and the interaction flows and has diversity of arguments.
It is essential to define the objectives before carrying out this method. Participants
must feel involved and provide quantitative data in detail to deepen and reach a
conclusion as accurate as possible.
Testimonials
Statements from customers as a sample of that our product is robust and reliable
is another measuring technique very effective to give us an idea about what our
customers think about us. However asking for a testimonial can be tough but is not
wrong, so we will try to get testimonials from our customers as soon as possible.
(Meylah Blog.com)
On the other hand, social media play a significant role in this field as well.
Today many companies are using these social networks to study the behaviour of
customers. Thus reviews on Facebook and YouTube, LinkedIn recommendations
and local search directories can be a great source of feedback from our
customers. If the comments are positive, it means we are in the right way and we
can be proud of our work. If instead they are negative, we need to assess case by
case, analyse our weaknesses and elaborate a new actions plan.
Market trend analysis
Know market needs is to know what to sell. The ability to grow and expand in the
labour market depends on the quality of our product and the level of satisfaction
that we offer to the needs of our customers.
To provide a quality product that meets satisfactorily the needs of our customers
we must analyse the market situation in the sector where we are (in our case,
aviation). To do this, we will collect all the information already published about it
from institutions, associations, magazines, universities and related organizations.
Basically the most helpful information for our interest is (Carlos Jimnez, 2014):
Market demand
Companies and customers profile
Predicting market in the future
Historical data from market performance
Price history
Competition
10
Get feedback from the customers of our competition is a great way to learn about
our competitors and what our potential customers like about them. As Meylah
Blog.com explains, experience is the best way to fine tune the way you capture
customer feedback, so don't worry about the way you do it as long as you do it.
We need to know the power of existing competitors and threats both potential
competition as substitutes. We must avoid creating an exact copy of what the
competition, however, we must always be alert and informed of their activities.
Sometimes we can even be influenced by their actions and inspirations which we
can replicate adapting them to our product. Innovate is to advance. The novelty in
our product means progress. Changes generate greater interest and usually bring
new customers.
2.3. Customer Needs Analysis (Kano Analysis)
The method chosen to capture customer needs has been the survey. For that, we
have carried out a plan of actions based on the following steps (Moreno
Research.com):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Those have been working with our simulator as a training product for +1
year.
Those have enjoyed our simulator as an entertainment product at less twice
in the past year.
Please complete the questionnaire below by scoring the Significance of each aspect
from 1-5 simulator as described by the proceeding scale:
1
Not
2
Somewhat
3
Somewh
4
Significa
5
Very
Significa
Insignifica
at
nt
Significa
12
nt
nt
Significa
nt
nt
Aspect
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Scor
e
[1-5]
We applied the questions and scoring for the simulator product with 250 clients.
We identified MUSTs, WANTs and EXTRAs based on the scoring table.
13
Once results have been collected from all respondents (97 in total), each
attributes score will be summed to provide a cumulative score which will be
categorised into customer musts, wants and extras as per the criteria described in
Table 3 below:
Cumulative
Score
MUSTs
WANTs
EXTRAs
> 370
270 - 370
< 270
14
Cumulat
Average
ive
Score
Score
Aspect
203
2.1
398
4.1
408
4.2
FDS-AN1 Annunciator
349
3.6
Integrated Backlighting
358
3.7
407
4.2
398
4.1
Professionally Engineered
417
4.3
269
2.8
401
4.1
10
417
4.3
310
3.2
12
13
Hardware
401
4.1
14
339
3.5
15
Software manual
378
3.9
16
Software updates
300
3.1
17
378
3.9
18
301
3.1
19
242
2.5
20
368
3.8
21
281
2.9
22
6 LCD screens
349
3.6
23
2 seats
329
3.4
24
232
2.4
25
Perspex windshield
203
2.1
11
15
16
shortcomings.
our strengths, cope to our weaknesses optimistically and remove our
the data, our plan of action after the survey must always be focused on leveraging
increase the current level of satisfaction of our customers. However, regardless of
A careful analysis of the results will help us define an action plan in order to
Step 6. Action plan
Figure 2 Customer Needs results
MUSTs
WANTs
EXTRAs
Musts
4.
1
4.
1
4.
1
3.
9
3.
9
3.
8
3.
7
3.
6
3.
6
3.
5
3.
4
3.
2
3.
1
3.
1
2.
9
2.
8
2.
5
2.
4
2.
Wants
6 LCD screens
Computer Matched Paint
2 seats
Adjustable Positioning
Support enquiries 24x7
Desirables
Software updates
maintenanceSupport and
10
Thermostat
procedureAssembly
10
simulator enginesMovement
4.
3
4.
2
4.
2
4.
1
screensHigh quality TV
Professionally Engineered
softwareWell coded
4.
3
dimensionsCockpit
Ergonomic
Customer Needs /
Expectations
RatingImportance
Design Requirements
7
9
6
9
10
8
10
6
10
9
9
8
10
7
10
8
10
10
17
1.5g
36
24
209.
3
33.3
64.4
The results from the above table show that Assemble Procedure, Support and
4K
66.5
6 Auxiliary inputs
Without bugs
34.2
6
value of $1M & ISO Insurance in the
117.5
153.2
Target value
1
2.
1
Perspex windshield
161.9
Part or
function
Assembly
Potential
failure
Order
Maintenance
Ergonomic
Dimensions
Risk
before
Action
taken
of failure
Risk after
action
taken
P
Total failure
Human root
Training
1 4
Delayed
Human cost
Staff investment
0 3
Not
ergonomic
design
Mistaken
measurement
1 3
Communication with
aircraft builder
0 3
ion
Not
availabl
Bad design
solution
Muscular
pain
Cockpit
Root Cause
misconcept
procedure
Support and
Effect on
system
Reduced space to
operate
18
Well coded
software
Minor
Bug in the
Malfunctioning
software
Failure debug
processing
16
3 4
12
according to the required criteria, we will add both scores per each provider.
The highest number obtained from this operation will correspond to the
supplier that meets better our simulators requirements.
To carry out this process we have relied on a table whose results are shown
below:
Selection and
Evaluation
Criteria
Functionalities
according to our
needs
Total cost (value
for
money/maintenan
ce)
Interface and
usage of use
Installation (time
and price)
Reliability
Location
Delivery time
Warranty
Reputation and
reviews of the
supplier
Customer Service
and Technical
Support after the
sale
Importa
nce
Pac Sim
Suppliers
PPO
Engineering
Satisfact
Sum
ion
Satisfact
ion
Su
m
16
17
LM & P Co.
Satisfact
ion
Sum
18
17
16
16
13
14
16
16
14
15
9
4
6
8
7
8
7
6
16
12
13
14
9
7
8
9
18
11
14
17
7
6
9
8
16
10
15
16
12
13
12
15
16
14
Totals
73
144
80
151
76
147
21
4.4. Conclusion
According to the table 7, PPO Engineering Company has the highest total of 151,
followed by LM & P Co. with 147 points and finally Pac Sim with the lowest sum of
144.
The results of the total sum are too close to determine straightaway the most
suitable supplier for the computer software however an analysis of each criterion
comparing provider by provider will help us to make the decision.
For instance, if we consider the criteria by level of importance, PPO Engineering
got the highest score in the most important required criteria: functionalities and
reliability.
Similarly, the total cost (value for money/maintenance) and the warranty have
been valued as one of the priorities on the required criteria of our simulator and we
can see also PPO Engineering got the largest amount in there. That means they
are cheaper than the others and the warranty conditions meet better our needs.
In contrast, another criterion valued as one of the main priorities was the interface
and usage of use where LM & P Co. had the highest amount before of PPO
Engineering and finally Pac Sim with the lowest sum. Same thing with Customer
Service and Technical support after the sale, however in this case Pac Sim
obtained the record, after that PPO Engineering and lastly LM & P Co.
On the other hand, the delivery time, reputation and reviews of the supplier and
location were evaluated as the less important criteria according our simulators
requirements and curiously the highest score for this factors were given to LM & P
Co. and Pac Sim, except the reputation where PPO Engineering had the top mark.
In conclusion, the sum of points according to level of importance by priorities as
well as the analysis and comparison based on level of satisfaction offered confirm
that PPO Engineering is the most suitable supplier which meets better our
22
requirements. They provide us with the best solution according to our priorities, at
lower cost and higher efficiency in the short-medium-long term.
Part 5: Statistical Process Control
5.1. Identifying the Processes
The following 10 processes contribute to the production of the simulator in no
particular order:
1. Design process: This process includes the analysis of market trends
and ground-breaking technology as well as the activity of the competition in
order to draw a situation plan of the market based in our product. Launch a
product without understanding our competitors is risky.
This phase also develops final drawings for use during manufacture. In our
particular case, it will be carried out the design of the major elements of the
simulator (Luz Adriana Aguirre Bonilla & Janneth Guarnizo Reyes, 2008):
o Structure design
Selection of the cockpit materials
Selection of the type of binding between the simulation cockpit
24
P-Chart
25
specification. The value of p must be the same for each of the n items in a
single sample.
According to Bill McNeese, if these two conditions are met, the binomial
distribution can be used to estimate the distribution of the counts and the p control
chart can be used.
C-Chart
A C-Chart displays how the number of defects for a process is changing over time.
(Statit.com) The number of defects is collected for the area of opportunity in each
subgroup. The area of opportunity can be either a group of units or just one
individual unit on which defect counts are performed. (Statit.com)
When constructing a C-Chart, it is important that the area of opportunity for a
defect be constant from subgroup to subgroup since the chart shows the total
number of defects. (Statit.com) When the number of items tested within a
subgroup changes, then a U-Chart should be used, since it shows the number of
defects per unit rather than total defects. (Statit.com)
U-Chart
Range (R-chart)
Range charts measure the variation in the data. (Statit.com) For example, the
weather report in the newspaper gives the high and low temperatures each day.
The difference between the high and the low is the range for that day.
The Range chart can be combined with I charts and X-bar charts. The chart
names combine the corresponding chart initials.
X-bar chart
An X-bar chart shows the changes in the average output of a process. (Statit.com)
It reflects either changes over time or changes associated with a categorical data
variable. (Statit.com)
The chart demonstrates how consistent and predictable a process is at achieving
the mean. (Statit.com) X-bar charts measure variation between subgroups. They
27
are often paired with either Standard Deviation (S) or Range (R) charts, which
measure variation within subgroups. (Statit.com)
5.3. Constructing and Using a SPC Chart
First, select one of the 10 processes identified under 5.1 and determine
which SPC chart you wish to use.
Then, make up a set of data (appropriate to your SPC chart) which should
include minimum 15 units of time or batch intervals. Then, using the
appropriate formulae, calculate CL, UCL, and LCL. (approx. 1 page).
Plot the complete chart including all the control and specification limits.
(approx. 1 page).
Finally, applying the Nelson Rules provide an interpretation of your chart.
(approx. half page).
Part 6: Problem-Solving
6.1. Identifying the Problems and Problem Solving Tools
During the operation of the simulator, some problems could occur including:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Software failure
Disruption of power supply
Overload
Component failures
Crash caused by user/customer
Some quality tools that could be used for problem-solving are (Salvador Climent
Serrano, 2005):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
29
Criteria matrix
The criteria matrix consists of a double entry matrix which provides the most
appropriated solution for the problem that needs to be solved. Its goal is to reduce
subjectivity to determine which of the solutions is more suited to preset criteria.
The solutions will be included in the rows and the criteria will be added in the
columns by score (being 1 the less suitable criterion according to the solution and
10 the most suitable).
See an example of the criteria matrix applied for our software failure problem
below in Table 8??
Criteria
Solutions
Spee
d
Reliabilit
y
30
Efficienc
y
Co
st
Total
Brainstorming
Brainstorming is a group creativity technique where group members (in this case,
team members involved in the manufacturing process of our simulator) provide the
largest possible number of ideas on a topic or problem in order to find a solution of
that issue. The contributions should be brief, no one can judge any of them and no
discussion.
The most important thing is the number of ideas. In our situation, we will offer a list
of possible causes which may explain the reason of the problem. From there, we
will be able to undertake the solving problem process in depth from this initial
analysis. An example of our brain storming session is shown below in Figure
4????:
Virus
Software not updated properly
Memory leak
Drivers
Installation of programs incompatible with the system
Possible Causes:
Problem: Software failure
Figure 4??? Brainstorming session
Data collection
Data Collection forms are used to collect data easily and facilitate its subsequent
analysis. Its method of use is based on the following steps:
31
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
In our case, the form designed to collect data regarding the software failure (daily
for 2 weeks) is shown below in Table 9????:
No
.
Dat
e
Tim
e
Proble
m
durati
on
(sec.)
Issue
La
g
Vir
us
Blac
k
scre
en
Distort
ed
image
s
Comme
nts
Frequency
Unexpec
ted
system
shutdow
ns
Oth
er
Alwa
ys
Oft
en
Someti
mes
Rare
ly
References
-
32
Nev
er
Staff
member
Focus groups for your product: Grasp customer needs and insights:
https://www.marsdd.com/mars-library/focus-groups/
Luz Adriana Aguirre Bonilla & Janneth Guarnizo Reyes (2008), Diseo
detallado de un simulador de vuelo dinmico:
http://bibliotecadigital.usbcali.edu.co/jspui/bitstream/10819/1698/1/diseno_de
tallado_simulador_aguirre_2008.pdf
34
35