Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Case Study: Compare and Contrast the Role of Graduate and Lead Teachers
Swinburne Online
Melisa Edwards
Introduction
The Australian Professional Standards for Teachers has been implemented throughout
Australia, and defines the expected outcomes for the four teaching levels; Graduate,
Proficient, Highly Accomplished and Lead. It covers seven standards which have been
classified into three domains; professional knowledge, professional practice and professional
engagement (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011). Standard three;
has been explained in greater detail through comparisons between the role and expectations
of Graduate and Lead teachers. This standard; lies within the professional practice teaching
domain and focuses on; planning for and implementing effective teaching and learning
covering seven focus areas, these are: effective classroom communication, use teaching
strategies, select and use resources, plan, structure and sequence learning programs, establish
challenging learning goals, engage parents/carers throughout the educative process and
evaluate and improve teaching programs (University of Southern Queensland, 2012).
Overview Standard 3: Plan for and implement effective teaching and learning
The Australian Professional Standard for Teachers (2013) defines the expectations of teachers
through the various career stages. The Standards define the work of teachers and outline the
foundations for effective, high-quality teaching to improve educational outcomes for students
within 21st century schools (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011).
When comparing Graduate and Lead teachers it is expected that Graduate level
teachers have completed their accredited teaching education and are able to; demonstrate
their knowledge and understanding of the implications for learning of students' cultural,
social, intellectual, linguistic and physical characteristics and are aware of the inclusive
strategies used to differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students
(Australian institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014). While Lead teachers; are
able to mentor both teachers and pre-service teachers, to advance knowledge and professional
engagement in others and to promote creative, innovative thinking among their colleagues
(Australian institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014), through shared learnings
and experiences. Lead teachers have proven their proficiency through the career stages and
are in a position where they are able to use their deep knowledge, understanding and
experience to help mentor fellow colleagues.
establish challenging and achievable learning goals and are able to provide Graduate level
teachers with guidance, to help encourage students to pursue challenging educational goals
throughout their schooling (Australian institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014).
The Tasmanian Teachers Registration Board (2013) explains that Graduate teachers can
demonstrate competence in this focus area through:
-
Lesson planning and/or learning programs, that are flexible, sequenced, include a
variety of resources and activities and are relevant to the learning outcomes.
Analysis or reflection of learning programs highlighting the teaching and learning
Objectives
Resources
Activities
Assessment
All of which, are important to understand and demonstrate as a Graduate teacher to confirm
competence in this focus area.
Graduate teachers can demonstrate their competence through the development of; lesson
plans and/or teaching programs highlighting the effective use of curriculum supported
materials, the development of reusable resources, incorporation of resources with the
classroom environment, modified resources agreeing to the outcomes, to support students
critical thinking and students use of resources appropriately (Teachers Registration Board of
Tasmania, 2013). Graduate teachers; must understand that resources are; used to
complement textbooks should promote and extend independent learning in addition to what
was learned in class and should provide for students differences by offering varied learning
activities at different levels of difficulty (Project Maths, n.d.). In addition when selecting
resources they must be able to demonstrate that they have considered:
-
commonly; assessed through observations made by another competent teacher; and would
focus on, lesson observation notes which demonstrate the teaching models used, explains the
use of appropriate terms for the level and stage, the use of acceptable and precise language,
as well as the use of voice effectively including a both oral and visual communication
strategies (Teachers Registration Board of Tasmania, 2013). In addition to other teacher
student interactions, the degree of success of verbal and non-verbal communication and
incorporation of other visual learning aids such as; word walls and concept maps.
Clinton et. al. (2007) explains that Graduate teachers may have problems evaluating
programs of less than three years, with various researchers arguing that; such timeframes are
too short to distinguish substantial, long-lasting changes in academic attainment (Clinton et
al., 2007). Emphasising the importance that Graduate teachers should; seek guidance from
experienced Lead teachers; to more effectively be able to evaluate students data, ensure
interpretation of assessments are accurate and that all learning programs expectations meet
the requirements of the national curriculum.
The Teachers Registration Board of Tasmania (2013) explains that Graduate teachers
can demonstrate their competence of this focus area, through: evaluation of teaching and
lesson plans/learning programs, based on evidence, including student evaluation and
feedback used to improve learning programs,. Their reflections of learning programs with
reference to the teaching and learning cycle, scope and sequence and their ability to modify
learning programs based on evidence, including student feedback (Teachers Registration
Board of Tasmania, 2013).
10
Conclusion
The Australian Professional Standards for Teachers has been implemented throughout
Australia, and defines the expected outcomes for the four teaching levels; Graduate,
Proficient, Highly Accomplished and Lead. It covers seven standards which have been
classified into three domain; professional knowledge, professional practice and professional
engagement. The role of Graduate and Lead teachers has been compared for standard three
and evidence of achievement at a Graduate level for this standard has been explained. As a
teacher progresses through the career stages, the expectations of them and their teaching and
learning programs increases; as they are seen to model the appropriate behaviours, teaching
strategies and techniques. It is important that Lead teachers understand that Graduate teachers
look to them for guidance; and that mentoring, providing feedback and evaluating their
performance is necessary to allow the Graduate teachers to develop their skills and progress
through the career stages. Above all, all teaching practices and outcomes need to be aligned
to the national curriculum and the code of professional standards.
11
References
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian
Professional Standards for Teachers. Victoria, Australia: Retrieved from
http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/apstresources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2013). Australian
Professional Standards for Teachers. In Australian Institute for Teaching
and School Leadership (Ed.).
Australian institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Australian
Professional Standards for Teachers. from
http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-forteachers/standards/overview/career-stages
Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Learning goals. Teaching Resources.
from http://teaching.berkeley.edu/learning-goals-0
12
Clinton, J., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2007). Evaluation of the Flaxmere project: when
families learn the language of school.
http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/10001
Department of Education and Employment. (2014). Parent and community
engagement framework: Working together to maximise student learning.
Queensland government Retrieved from
http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/parent-community-engagementframework/resources/pdf/parent-community-engagement-framework.pdf.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2002). Lesson planning. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.),
Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2007). Engaging parents in raising achievement: Do
parents know they matter? Research report. http://wiki.ictregister.net/images/0/0a/July_07_Every_parent_matters.pdf
Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do Parents Know They Matter? Engaging All
Parents in Learning. Educational Research. 50, 3, 277-289.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal
setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57,
705-717.
Miller, P. W. (1988). Nonverbal communication in human interaction: National
Educational Association of the United States.
Muller, D. (2006a). Family-School Partnerships Project: a qualitative and
quantitative study. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and
Training.
Muller, D. (2006b). Parental engagement: Social and economic effects. Prepared
for the Australian Parents Council: Retrieved from
http://www.austparents.edu.au.
Project Maths. (n.d.). Guideline to resources. Learning and Teaching for the 21st
Century. from http://www.projectmaths.ie/learningResources/guideline.asp
Scarino, A. (1995). Planning, describing and monitoring long-term progress in
language learning. Babel, 30, 4-13.
Scarino, A. (2008). Community and culture in intercultural language learning.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 1-15. doi:
10.2104/aral0805
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.
Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Teachers Registration Board of Tasmania. (2013). Change of Registration
Category. Retrieved from https://www.trb.tas.gov.au/Shared
%20Documents/Appendix%201%20Detailed%20evidence
%20examples.pdf.
Tschirner, E. (1996). Scope and Sequence: Rethinking Beginning Foreign
Language. The Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 1-14. doi:
10.2307/329054
University of Southern Queensland. (2012). Professional Experience Report,. In S.
Lowe (Ed.): University of Southern Queensland.
Woodward, T. (2001). Planning Lessons and Courses: Designing Sequences of
Work for the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.