DAVID, Lean Renz J.

DE AMA, Syd Ian Matthew B.

MIRANDA, Jose III S.
TAN, Liel Onairam T.

In determining the satisfactory rate of the system three main points are considered (1)
functionality, (2) User-friendliness, and lastly (3) usability
To evaluate the system properly the likert scale is to be used with a 5 point scale that corresponds
to the following description
Table 1: Likert Scale
Scale

Range
1.0 1.8
1.9 2.7
2.8 3.6
3.7 4.5
4.6 5.0

1
2
3
4
5

Interpretation
Not Acceptable
Limited Acceptability
Moderately Acceptable
Acceptable
Highly Acceptable

A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE DEAF THAT EMPLOYS SIGN

LANGUAGE RECOGNITION THROUGH IMAGE PROCESSING TO INCREASE
USER-CONTENT INTERCACTIVITY
Direction: This tool asks for your evaluation of the system deployed in conducting the study
above, to establish its validity. You are requested to give your honest assessment using the
criteria bellow; please check only one from each selection.
Scale
1
2
3
4
5

Interpretation
Not Acceptable
Limited Acceptability
Moderately Acceptable
Acceptable
Highly Acceptable

Educators Validator Questionnaire Assessment

Indicators
1. The system contains appropriate material.

Rating
1 2 3 4 5

2. Learning material is displayed in an orderly manner.

3. The screen is not overloaded with information at any point.
4. The choice of system color, design and icons are appropriate, taking in
consideration its target user.
5. The system provides enough information, guidance and tooltips about
its usage and operation.
6. Interface design clear, simple and in order as to avoid confusion.
7. The system reports progress of students correctly.
8. The system is fast and doesnt take much time to generate reports.
9. Reports presented are clear and concise, informative yet intuitive.
Comments and Suggestions: ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name of the Validator

A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE DEAF THAT EMPLOYS SIGN

LANGUAGE RECOGNITION THROUGH IMAGE PROCESSING TO INCREASE
USER-CONTENT INTERCACTIVITY
Direction: This tool asks for your evaluation of the system deployed in conducting the study
above, to establish its validity. You are requested to give your honest assessment using the
criteria bellow; please check only one from each selection.
Scale
1
2
3
4
5

Interpretation
Not Acceptable
Limited Acceptability
Moderately Acceptable
Acceptable
Highly Acceptable

Technical Validator Questionnaire Assessment

Indicators
1. The system recognizes member signs correctly.

Rating
1 2 3 4 5

2. The system consistently recognizes member signs correctly.

3. The system recognizes member signs and responds appropriately.
4. The system performs its algorithms and processes fast enough and
doesnt require much time to respond from user interaction.
5. The system rarely generates errors, freezes or crashes.
6. The system is easy to navigate.
7. The system performs optimally on computer systems even on those
within minimum specifications.
8. The system is easy to troubleshoot and resolves errors without
crashing.
9. The system can be set-up, installed and be operated with ease.
Comments and Suggestions: ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name of the Validator