Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
QSS Ruling
Minimum Standards for Education
and Training (MSET)
Assessment system
Friday, November 25, 2016
Assessment
of
MET Institutes
Penilaian lembaga diklat
(QSS Framework ANNEX A / Part 2)
November 25,
Assessment System
WHY AN ASSESSMENT
SYSTEM ?
Because part of STCW 95 regulations :
One aspect of the STCW-treaty regards a
QSS : a Quality Standard System.
One aspect of the QSS requires a tool to
monitor training, assessment of
competence, certification, endorsement and
revalidation activities.
November 25,
Assessment System
1. Certification system
2. All training courses and programmes
3. Examinations and assessments
4. Qualifications and experience of
instructors and assessors
5. Internal quality assurance reviews
November 25,
Assessment System
1. Certification system
2. All training courses and programmes
3. Examinations and assessments
4. Qualifications and experience of
instructors and assessors
5. Internal quality assurance reviews
November 25,
Assessment System
How ?
By carrying out an assessment the required
level can be ascertained.
With QSS, a minimum defined level of
training, assessment and certification must
be guarantied.
November 25,
Assessment System
Note :
A Quality Management System (QMS) is
not the same as a QSS, but
a Quality Management System is part of the
QSS.
November 25,
Assessment System
Conclusion :
An assessment instrument to audit the
maritime institutions in Indonesia in order
to:
control the minimum required standard of
STCW 95
increase the credibility of the Indonesian
maritime sector
keep Indonesia on the IMO white list
November 25,
Assessment System
Assessment System
= SOFTWARE
Assessment System
10
So :
Annex A Part 1\ATT ANT III\EQ ATT
III.doc
Annex A Part 1\ATT ANT III\MSET III.doc
Annex A Part 1\ATT ANT III\SCO ATT
III.doc
Annex A Part 1\ATT ANT III\EQ ANT
III.doc
November 25,
Assessment System
11
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
SUB TOTALS
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
Date
Function
Signature
:
:
:
:
November 25,
Assessment System
12
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
SUB TOTALS
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
Date
Function
Signature
:
:
:
:
November 25,
Assessment System
13
EQ A-II/1
File code
A-II/1-1
Equipment Cluster
Abbreviation
Navigation equipment
EQ-Na
EQ-El
EQ-Co
Meteorology equipment
EQ-Me
EQ-Em
EQ-Vs
Manoeuvring equipment
EQ-Ma
EQ-En
EQ-Ra
A-II/1-2
EQ-Ca
A-II/1-3
Controlling equipment
EQ-Cn
A-II/1-C
COM
Computer room
EQ-Cr
November 25,
Library
Assessment
System
EQ-Li
14
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
F1
EQ-Na
File Code
Navigation Equipment
column 1
no.
A-II/1.1
column 2
column 3
column 4
Available
quantity suitability
in %
Comments
EQ-Na
column 5
Points
max
actual
Navigation Equipment
25
1.3 Binocular
1.5 Chronometer
1.6 Sextant
>5
10
1.7 Stopwatch
etc.
etc.
30
10
1
134
0
0
etc.
etc.
etc.
November 25,
Assessment System
Subtotals
15
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
A II-1
EQ
Equipment
Points
Description
File Code
A-II/1 Com
A-II/1- EQ-Cr
A-II/1- EQ-Li
A-II/1- EQ-Tb
A-II/1- EQ-Vc
A-II/1 EQ 1
A-II/1- EQ-Na
A-II/1- EQ-El
A-II/1- EQ-Co
A-II/1- EQA-II/1- EQA-II/1- EQ-Vs
A-II/1- EQA-II/1- EQ-En
A-II/1- EQ-Ra
A-II/1 EQ 2
A-II/1- EQ-Ca
OPERATIONAL LEVEL
Computer room
LIBRARY
Textbooks
Video cassettes and VCD
NAVIGATION AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL
Navigation Equipment
Electronic Navigation Equipment
Collision Regulations Equipment
Meteorology Equipment
Emergency procedures Equipment
Visual signalling Equipment
Manoeuvring Equipment
English language Equipment
Radar navigation laboratory
CARGOHANDLING AND STOWAGE AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL
Cargo handling and stowage
CONTROLLING SHIP'S OPERATIONS AND CARE FOR PERSONS
A-II/1 EQ 3
ON BOARD AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL
A-II/1- EQ-Cn Controlling equipment
Subtotals
max
actual
304
295
225
0
0
134
110
10
30
5
10
15
70
280
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
40
1568
(a)
0
0
(b)
November 25,
Assessment System
16
Name Institute :
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
SUB TOTALS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
:
Date
:
Function :
November
Signature
:
25,
Assessment System
17
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
SUB TOTALS
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
Date
Function
Signature
:
:
:
:
November 25,
Assessment System
18
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
ORGANIZATION AND STAFF RESOURCES - OS
Available Suitability
yes no
in %
Comments
November
25, ASSESSMENT
Assessment
System
TOTAL
SCORE BLOCK
OS
File Code
COM
OS
Points
max
actual
10
70
50
50
30
70
70
30
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
80
60
40
30
30
50
70
70
Totals 1000 (a)
= (b : a) x 10
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (b)
November 25,
Assessment System
20
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
ORGANIZATION AND STAFF RESOURCES - OS
Available Suitability
yes no
in %
Comments
November
25, ASSESSMENT
Assessment
System
TOTAL
SCORE BLOCK
OS
File Code
COM
OS
Points
max
actual
10
70
50
50
30
70
70
30
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
80
60
40
30
30
50
70
70
Totals 1000 (a)
= (b : a) x 10
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (b)
Name Institute :
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
SUB TOTALS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
:
Date
:
Function :
November
Signature
:
SIMILAR ASSESSMENT
PROCEDURE AS FOR
ORGANIZATION & STAFF
RESOURCES
25,
Assessment System
22
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
SUB TOTALS
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
Date
Function
Signature
:
:
:
:
November 25,
Assessment System
23
STCW : 6 Functions :
Nautical :
Navigation 8 competences
Cargo handling and stowage 2 competences
Technical :
Marine engineering 7 competences
Electrical, electronic and control engineering 1 comp.
Maintenance and repair 1 competences
Assessment System
24
STCW : 6 functions :
Nautical :
Navigation 8 competences
Cargo handling and stowage 2 comp.
ANT III
ANT IV
Technical :
Marine engineering 7 comp.
Electrical, electronic and control engineering 1 comp.
Maintenance and repair 1 comp.
Assessment System
25
STCW : 6 functions :
Nautical :
Navigation 8 competences
Cargo handling and stowage 2 competences
Technical :
ATT III
ATT IV
Assessment System
26
Function Competence :
Every function contains one or more
competences, e.g. :
Function : Navigation
Competence : Maintain a safe navigational
watch
Or :
Function : Marine engineering
Competence : Operate pumping system and
associated control systems
November 25,
Assessment System
27
Competence Subject :
Comp : Maintain a safe navigational watch
Every competence contains one or more
subjects, e.g. :
1 : Knowledge of the ColRegs
2 : Principles in keeping a navigational
watch
3 : The use of routeing
November 25,
Assessment System
28
Function
Competence
NAVIGATION
Subject
related activities
for professional
discipline
KUPS
training
outcome
November 25,
Assessment System
29
Subject Topic :
Every subject contains one or more topics,
e.g. :
Subject : Knowledge of the ColRegs
Topic : Content, application and intent of
the Collision Regulations
Annex A Part 1\ANT-ATT III\SCO ANT
III.doc
November 25,
Assessment System
30
Function
Competence
NAVIGATION
Subject
Topic
November 25,
Assessment System
related activities
for professional
discipline
KUPS
training
outcome
area of
performance
31
Function
Competence
Subject
Topic
MARINE ENGINEERING
November 25,
Assessment System
related activities
for professional
discipline
KUPS
training
outcome
area of
performance
32
STCW : 6 functions :
Nautical :
Navigation 8 competences
Cargo handling and stowage 2 competences
Technical :
Marine engineering 7 competences
Electrical, electronic and control engineering 1 comp.
Maintenance and repair 1 comp.
Assessment System
33
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
SUB TOTALS
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
Date
Function
Signature
:
:
:
:
November 25,
Assessment System
34
Example
Function 1 Navigation
8 competences (C 1.1 up to C 1.8)
C 1.1
C 1.2
C 1.3
C 1.4
C 1.5
C 1.6
C 1.7
C 1.8
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
November 25,
Assessment System
35
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
F: 1
C: 1.1
S: 1.1.1
column 1
no.
1
2
3
A-II/1
column 2
column 3
column 4
column 5
column 6
Examination
method
(use legend 1)
Points
Actually instructed
% covered
yes
no
(par 5.1.4 d)
Solar system
max
6
6
5
6
Amplitude
Nautical Almanac
10
10
11
Position fixing
54
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
November 25,
actual
ED 1.1
12
10
Assessment System
37
128
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
F: 1
C: 1.1
File Code
A-II/1
maximum
points
actual
points
128
218
34
17
62
79
544
(a)
0
(b)
0
544
ED 1.1
Assessor 1
Name:
Function:
Date:
Signature:
Date:
Signature:
Assessor 2
Name:
Function:
November 25,
Assessment System
38
Name Institute:
Address
:
Date of audit :
A-II/1
File Code
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
A-II/1
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Points
Description
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Subtotals
max
544
122
66
34
2
60
59
15
actual
902
November 25,
Assessment System
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
902
0.0
39
Name Institute :
Address
:
Date of audit :
WEIGHING
FACTOR
CORRECTED
SCORE
24
(a)
0
(b)
BLOCKS
SUB TOTALS
OVERALL SCORE (b : a)
Name
:
Date
:
Function :
November
Signature
:
25,
Assessment System
40
Assessment System
41
Assessment System
42
PROBLEMS
Management level
Required
minimum
STCW level of
knowledge,
understanding
and proficiency
Operational level
National curriculum
Actual assessed school
level ??
Additional national
requirements
November 25,
25 STCW competences
(minimum requirements)
within 6 functions
Assessment System
43
Required
minimum
STCW level of
knowledge,
understanding
and proficiency
Operational level
National curriculum
Actual assessed school
level ??
Additional national
requirements
November 25,
25 STCW competences
(minimum requirements)
within 6 functions
Assessment System
44
FRAMEWORK QSS
QSS Ruling
ANNEX A - Part 1 / Minimum Standards
ANNEX A - Part 2 / Assessment Forms
Completed !
November 25,
Assessment System
45
FRAMEWORK QSS
PBSI 1
2002
THE END
Presentation
Friday 25 November 2016
QUESTIONS ?
November 25,
Assessment System
47