Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264390496
CITATIONS
READS
425
3 authors:
James R Donaldson
Behrooz Haddad
17 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Wasim S Khan
University of Cambridge
289 PUBLICATIONS 2,249 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
185
Open Access
UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
Abstract: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a surgical emergency warranting prompt evaluation and treatment. It
can occur with any elevation in interstitial pressure in a closed osseo-fascial compartment. Resultant ischaemic damage
may be irreversible within six hours and can result in long-term morbidity and even death. The diagnosis is largely
clinical with the classical description of pain out of proportion to the injury. Compartment pressure monitors can be a
helpful adjunct where the diagnosis is in doubt. Initial treatment is with the removal of any constricting dressings or casts,
avoiding hypotension and optimizing tissue perfusion by keeping the limb at heart level. If symptoms persist, definitive
treatment is necessary with timely surgical decompression of all the involved compartments. This article reviews the
pathophysiology, diagnosis and current management of ACS.
Keywords: Compartment pressure monitoring, compartment syndrome, fasciotomy, ischaemic contracture, myofascial
compartment.
INTRODUCTION
Richard von Volkmann first described compartment
syndrome in 1881 [1]. He suggested that paralysis and
contracture came simultaneously as a result of an
interruption to the blood supply of the affected muscles. The
first surgeon to reproduce ischaemic contracture in animals
was Paul Jepson in 1924 [2] whilst working at the Mayo
Foundation. He also demonstrated that prompt surgical
decompression could prevent these contractures. Acute
compartment syndrome (ACS) is now considered a surgical
emergency warranting prompt evaluation and treatment.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Fracture
Burns
Crush injury
Infection
Injection injury
Bleeding disorders
Penetrating trauma
Arterial injury
Constrictive dressings
Reperfusion
Casts
Extravasation of drugs
Injury severity.
Duration of ischaemia.
186
Donaldson et al.
Increased
compartment content
Decreased
compartment size
Shock
Elevation of
extremity
Increased
intracompartmental pressure
Increased
exudation
Increased
capillary
pressure
Increased
venous
pressure
Vasospasm
Decreased arteriolar
transmural pressure difference
Closure of arterioles
Increased capillary
permeability
Decreased
tissue perfusion
Muscle and
nerve necrosis
Fig. (1). Pathophysiology of compartment syndrome. 2011 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Reprinted from the Journal of
the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Volume 19 [1], pp. 49-58 with permission.
elapsed. Clues may also be evident from the history: highenergy injuries, anticoagulation therapy or haemophilia
significantly increase the likelihood of developing ACS.
Physical signs are often few but there may be a firm,
wooden feeling on deep palpation. Reduced two-point
discrimination or vibration sense may be found in the early
stages; if a major sensory deficit is evident the syndrome is
already far advanced.
Pain out of proportion to the injury and pain with
passive stretching of the muscles in the compartment are the
earliest, most reliable indicators of ACS [25].
If the diagnosis is not in doubt, emergent surgical
fasciotomy is needed. Where doubt remains, the intracompartmental pressures can be measured. A transducer
connected to a catheter is introduced under aseptic
conditions into the compartment in question within 5 cm of
the zone of injury. Proprietary devices are available (e.g.
Stryker monitor [26]) or a transducer can be fashioned from
standard hospital equipment [27] (Fig. 2). The anterior
compartment is the most affected and accessible in the leg
and often compartment pressures are measured here first. All
compartments in the affected limb should be measured if
there is enough clinical concern [28]; marginal readings
should be repeated with further compartment pressure
readings and repeat physical exam.
Many authors advocate the use of continuous intracompartmental pressure monitoring in all at risk patients [29]
and those where extra clinical vigilance is advised [30]. It
has also been suggested that pressure monitoring may detect
187
normal saline
Thorough debridement
188
Donaldson et al.
ANTERIOR
TA
EDL
DEEP POSTERIOR
PB
LATERAL
TP
FDL
PL
FHL
SOL
SUPERFICIAL POSTERIOR
2.
3.
Posterior
complex.
4.
superficial
containing
the
gastrosoleus
Anterior
Lateral
Deep
posterior
Superficial posterior
189
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
HAND
THIGH
The thigh has three compartments (Fig. 5):
3.
Adductor pollicis
FEMUR
MEDIAL
LATERAL
190
Donaldson et al.
VOLAR COMPARTMENT
FCR
PT
FDS
FCU
MOBILE WAD
BR
FPL
FDP
ECRB
E
C
R
L
SUP
EDC
ECU
EDM
DORSAL COMPARTMENT
FOOT
Foot compartment syndrome is controversial both in
terms of anatomy and in terms of treatment. Some authors
advocate four compartments (medial, lateral, central and
interosseous); others have expanded on this creating nine:
Medial
abductor hallucis
flexor hallucis brevis
Lateral
o
abductor digiti minimi
o
flexor digiti minimi brevis
o
o
Interosseous (x4)
Central (x3)
o
superficial
quadratus plantae
o
deep
adductor hallucis
191
AND
WOUND
Management
of
fasciotomy
wounds
remains
controversial. Most advocate leaving the wounds open with
delayed primary closure or skin grafting within 7-10 days
when the compartment syndrome has completely resolved. A
second look and debridement is usually necessary at 48-72
hours. Interim coverage can be achieved with simple
absorbent dressings, semi-permeable membranes, vessel
loops in a bootlace pattern or with negative pressure
dressings, which can be helpful in allowing later closure
[44].
Fasciotomies are not benign procedures and there are
multiple associated complications [45]:
Pruritus (33%)
DELAYED FASCIOTOMY
192
Donaldson et al.
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
MEDICO-LEGAL PITFALLS
ACS is a common cause of litigation. In nearly all cases,
compartment pressures are never measured. Other potential
pitfalls include malpositioning of the compartment pressure
monitor, equipment errors and failure to correlate pressure
reading with the clinical findings.
[16]
[17]
[18]
CONCLUSION
ACS is a surgical emergency and a high level of suspicion is
needed in all potential cases. Compartment pressure monitoring
may aid in the diagnosis, with a delta pressure of 30 mmHg or
below suggestive of ACS. The definitive treatment is prompt
surgical decompression of all the involved compartments. A
delay of more than six hours is associated with irreversible
myoneural damage and timing is crucial. Delayed fasciotomy
after 8-10 hours is associated with significantly increased risks
which may outweigh any potential benefit.
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this article content has no
conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
193
Bhattacharyya T, Vrahas MS. The medical-legal aspects of compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 864-8.
Fitzgerald AM1, Gaston P, Wilson Y, Quaba A, McQueen MM. Longterm sequelae of fasciotomy wounds. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53(8): 6903.
Bermudez K, Knudson M, Morabito D. Fasciotomy, chronic venous
insufficiency and the calf muscle pump. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 1356-61.
World Federation of Haemophilia Guidelines for the Management of
Haemophilia. Updates 2013. Available from:
http://www.wfh.org/en/resources/wfh-treatment-guidelines
Rajic N, Savic A, Popovic S, Urosevic I, Savic I. Successful control of
bleeding during supracondylar amputation caused by severe
compartment syndrome in patient with haemophilia A and high titre of
inhibitor. Haemophilia 2009; 15(2): 601-2.
Negrier C, Goudemand J, Sultan Y, Bertrand M, Rothschild C, Lauroua
P. Multicenter retrospective study on the utilization of FEIBA in France
in patients with factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors. French FEIBA
Study Group. Factor Eight Bypassing Activity. Thromb Haemost 1997;
77(6): 1113-9.