Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Date
Tuesday,12 July
10.00 - 10.30
Committee meeting
Thursday 8 September,
9.00 - 11.00
and 12 September
19.30 - 22.00
(Strasbourg)
Coordinators meeting
By 23 September
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Constitutive meeting
Tuesday, 27 September
09.00 - 11.30
Committee meeting
Wednesday 12 October
09.00 - 11.00
Coordinators meeting
1|P a g e
Date
Thursday, 13 October
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
Topic / objective
International standards set at
supranational level by
international/ intergovernmental
bodies, and their enforcement
Workshop on How to be well
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Tuesday, 8 November,
09h00-11h00
Coordinators meeting
Tuesday, 8 November
14.00 - 15.30
Committee meeting
2|P a g e
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
1st panel:
- Speakers from OLAF, EUROPOL, EUROJUST,
Monday, 14 November
15.00 - 18.30
Committee meeting
Wednesday, 16
November
11.00 - 12.30
Extraordinary meeting
2nd panel:
- Speakers from CTIF-CFI, Belgian Financial
Intelligence Unit (FIU), Michel Claise, Belgian
investigative judge, Investigation Group
Organised Group - Tax Fraud of the North
Rhine-Westphalia tax authorities, College of
the French prudential supervisor
Monday, 21 November,
19h00-22h00
(Strasbourg)
Coordinators meeting
Thursday, 7 December
15.00 to 18.30
Committee meeting
Week 49?
Monday, 23 January,
15h00-17h00
Coordinators meeting
3|P a g e
10
Date
Tuesday, 24 January
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Request from GUE group to have one or two case studies: One of these studies could, for example, focus on the activities of Deutsche Bank. Potentially in
combination with the much smaller Berenberg Bank, Deutsche Bank would certainly be one prime example that we could look at th oroughly in terms of compliance
with AML due diligence and general involvement in helping clients set up offshore structures. Deutsche Bank's ties with tax havens is clearly stated in Obermayer's
and Obermaier's book on the Panama Papers. They write that "all in all, Deutsche Bank has arranged or managed more than 400 o ffshore companies for its clients"
and that Deutsche Bank's involvement was the "largest and most scandalous" (pp. 246 and 249).
Another case study could scrutinise the activities of law firms, such as Mossack Fonseca.
4|P a g e
11
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
BANKS:
Nordea Bank
HSBC bank
5|P a g e
12
Date
Topic / objective
Thursday, 26 January
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
Priorities Presidency
Thursday, 26 January
14.00 - 15.30
Workshop
Week 4 (Jan)
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Socit Gnrale
Deutsche Bank
Landesbanken (u.a. Bayern LB)
Crdit suisse
UBS, JP Morgan,
Whistleblower Hernan Arbizu, former Vice
President of JP Morgan Argentina
6|P a g e
13
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Interparliamentary week
31 January am
Tuesday, 31 January,
15h00 - 17h00
Committee meeting (tbc, to
be checked whether if would
be authorised given the
Inter Parliamentary Week)
Tuesday 31 January
17.00 - 18.30
Coordinators meeting (tbc)
Seamus Coffey is working on an independent study for the Irish government as regards a review of the Irish tax code (see page B 30 and 31 of
https://www.google.be/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwivp6lupjQAhUBMxQKHcE5D70QFggpMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.budget.gov.ie%2FBudgets%2F2017%2FDocuments%2FBudget%25202017%2520%2520Full%2520document.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGla482fzXcOrUYAOr1moEReQLM2g&sig2=rt2GKakiGwNNDSrtkmfbzw&bvm=bv.137904068,d.d24
7|P a g e
14
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Thursday, 9 February
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
8|P a g e
15
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
BANKS:
Nordea Bank
HSBC bank
Socit Gnrale
Deutsche Bank
Landesbanken (u.a. Bayern LB)
Crdit suisse
UBS, JP Morgan,
Whistleblower Hernan Arbizu, former Vice
President of JP Morgan Argentina
Key hedge funds from the shadow banking
sector implicated in the Panama Papers
Two former compliance officers of German
Berenberg Bank (Ms Aleksandra Helena
Sobisz and Ms Katrin Keikert) , which has
been heavily cited in PP matters. Both
have been made redundant after alerting
dubious practices to their management
and would be willing to testify at our
committee. We also propose to invite the
CEO of the bank as well, as he is also
9|P a g e
16
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
9 pm-10 February
Possible delegation to UK
Circulation of the study/ briefing
for the delegation visit to
Luxembourg
22 February
Thursday, 2 March,
14h00-16h00
Coordinators meeting
Monday, 6 March
15.00 - 18.30
Committee meeting
Continuation of meeting of 9
February
17
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Possible mission to US
Hearing with the ministers or representatives
from jurisdictions that are considered as tax
havens by the EU (the EU list is expected by
the end of 2016)
Suggested speakers to be selected from
groups proposals:
Tuesday, 21 March
15.00 - 18.30
Committee meeting
Possibly cancelled,
depending on the decision of
CoP - Mission to US
Consideration of draft
report
18
Date
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
PANA Report
Tuesday, 28 March
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
(replacing 21 March)
Consideration of draft
report
19
Date
Topic / objective
Monday, 3 April,
19h00-22h00
Coordinators meeting
(replaces meeting of 11
April)
Thursday 6 April (SB)
8:30 - 11.00
Committee meeting
(Replaces meeting of 12
April)
Week 16 (April)
Delegation (possibly)
PANA Report
Deadline for
amendments4
Monday, 27 March
12h00
Deadline written
questions
Consideration of
amendments
Tuesday, 2 May
15h00-17h30
Coordinators meeting
Wednesday, 3 May
15.00 - 18.30
Committee meeting
(there has been a swap of
4
Deadline for amendments should ideally take place after the hearing with Ministers
13 | P a g e
20
Date
the themes of the 6 April
and 3 May meetings
because the 6 April meeting
will be in SB)
Topic / objective
(a one day meeting may be
needed for this)
PANA Report
Thursday, 4 May
9.00 - 12.30
Committee meeting
Deadline written
questions
Thursday, 18 May,
10h00-12h30
(Strasbourg)
Coordinators meeting
14 | P a g e
21
Date
Week 21 (May)
Delegation (possibly)
Topic / objective
Deadline written
questions
Tuesday, 30 May
15.00 - 18.30
Committee meeting
In case mandate is
extended
Thursday, 1st June
PANA Report
Debate / vote in
Plenary
Groups Suggestions that could not be included in the roadmap given the limited number of meetings or which do not seem to fit
with the themes of the above mentioned hearings/ events5:
- Workshop on whistleblowers;
- WORKSHOP on money laundering, comparison of the old and revised AMLD, taking in consideration especially the issue of trusts
- On public investment and the use of sanctions. Dialogue with representatives from the EIB, EBRD, EFSI and others and put pressure on them
to come up with ethical investment strategies which means no EU public money can go to individuals or companies, or through countries, which
have been found to be complicit in tax evasion, aggressive tax avoidance, money laundering or terrorist financing. PANA should also put
pressure on the Council and the Commission to undertake a more general revision of EU funding under the Financial Regulation so that other
measures can also be taken, such as withdrawing Common Agricultural Policy funding from companies registered in tax havens (a s required by
the ECON INI report)
- Hearing with Ministers to share our findings and ask what has been done since the revelations (at the end of PANA work)
- (during interpaliamentary week)- Workshops with the rapporteurs from national parliaments on single issues (CBCR, AMLD, tax heavens...)
5
The roadmap is a living document. It is a suggestion by the Secretariat based on contributions received from political groups and should be considered as such. Coordinators are
consulted on the roadmap at each coordinators meeting. Persons/ events mentioned below will therefore be added to the roadmap in the course of the PANA mandate.
15 | P a g e
22
- A hearing should be held on the theme of Policy proposals and best practice and focus on proposals for reform from experts, academics and
NGOs. (Ideally the amendments will still be open at this stage).
Speakers could be:
Markus Meinzer (Tax Justice Network, to speak on tax havens, information exchange systems, transparency standards, antimoney laundering standards etc.)
Prof. Prem Sikka (University of Essex) or George Rozvany (tax lawyer) to speak on regulating the Big Four accountancy firms
- if mission to the US is approved: US anti-money laundering standards can differ from European ones, therefore we would like to hear from
US officials about their own standards and means for implementations and enforcement 5IF MI
- Hearing on the revelations of the Panama Papers involving developing countries:
- Speakers that are not yet mentioned in the roadmap but who are mentioned by at least one political group:
Jack Blum: US leading white collar defence attorney, specialised in money laundering
Representative of NGOs: e.g.Tax Justice Network
Members from the OECD JITSIC (Joint International Taskforce on Shared Intelligence and Collaboration) network
Members of the Spanish investigation team from El Confidencial and La Sexta
Mr Rodrigo Rato as former Spanish Minister of the Economy and Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund;
Advocat and former employee of the US Treasury Neil Barovsky;
Brooke Harrington, Danish sociologist and asset manager;
Jean Ziegler, Swiss author;
Representative of FIFA;
Marius Kohl and Wim Piotte from PwC Luxembourg as well as Fabien Grasser from Le Quotidien Luxembourg on allegations of
administrative corruption in the context of the Luxembourg tax ruling practice as evidenced by Raphael Halet in his trial in Luxembourg
(alternatively to be covered in delegation visit to Luxembourg).
16 | P a g e
23
- The PANA committee should make a public call to receive information by any interested person, including whistleblowers. Any c ontributing
person could be invited to participate to a hearing if the information they shared with the committee is deemed relevant for the fulfilment of the
PANA committee mandate. For example, the Committee could look at specific cases, such as the money laundering case from banqu e Pasche
Monaco / Crdit Mutuel. It looks like investigations in France are progressing but not in Monaco, which has signed agreements to exchange tax
information with other European countries. We can provide additional information.
- One of the hearings should examine the Bahamas Leaks revelations including calling the figures directly implicated including Neelie Kroes (also
as regards her role as former Commissioner on Competition) and Mauricio Macri (the President of Argentina is related to revelations from
Bahama Leaks as well as Panama Papers, and the whole structure that seems to have been exposed includes some Italian companies as well;
see http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-309699-2016-09-18.html and http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-309974-2016-09-22.html).
17 | P a g e
24