Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 1:16-cv-3144-LJM-DML
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CHRISTOPHER BURNHAM, JUDGE,
Defendant.
Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Lagerstrom v. Kingston, 463 F.3d 621, 624 (7th Cir. 2006). To
survive dismissal under federal pleading standards,
[the] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a
claim to relief that is plausible on its face. A claim has facial plausibility when the
plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable
inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).
Based on this screening, the complaint must be dismissed. The plaintiffs claims are all
based on alleged actions the defendant took in the course of state court proceedings. For example,
the plaintiffs allege that defendant Judge Burnham operating in co-conspiracy, collusion with one
another and other individuals for the purposes of such discrimination, deprived [plaintiffs] of right,
money and property. Throughout the 47 page complaint, the plaintiffs go on to make multiple
allegations against Judge Burnham accusing him of discriminating against the plaintiffs based on
their religion, and of mismanaging the plaintiffs litigation in state court. The claims against Judge
Burnham are barred by absolute judicial immunity. See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 359
(1978). This is based on the general principle of the highest importance to the proper
administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, shall be
free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself.
Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 10 (1991). Judicial immunity is not overcome by allegations of bad
faith or malice, the existence of which ordinarily cannot be resolved without engaging in discovery
and eventual trial. Id. at 11. Because the allegations against Judge Burnham are based on actions
he took in his capacity as a judge presiding over state court proceedings, the claims against him
must be dismissed based on judicial immunity.
Date: 11/22/2016
Distribution:
Tatiana Zavodnik
Gersh Zavodnik
9750 E. 25th Street, #318
Indianapolis, IN 46229
________________________________
LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana