CASE: COSTA RICAN TRADE, FOREIGN INVESTMENT,
AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION!
Costa Rca, a Central American country of nearly 4 millon people (see Map 6.1), borders the Pacific
Ocean and the Caribbean arm of the Atantic Ocean. its name means “rich coast” because ofits fertile
soll and rich biodiversity. n some ways Costa Ria is typical of developing counties. it has a low per
Capita income ($9,000 in 2003 based on purchasing orica panty), igh dependence an primary products
{or export earnings (primarily bananas, coes, pineapples, and sugar), manulactured products that rad.
"oully used high inputs of cheap lator for its foreign exchange earings, and afeirty high evel of axter-
nal debt. In many other ways, however, Costa Ria is atypical. is fiteracy rate of 96 peroent, is ite
expectancy at bith of 76.43 years, and its fairly even income distribution (the highest 10 percent nave
about one-third af income) are more similar to figures for developed countries. Further, Costa Rica has a
Jang history of politic democracy and stability.
Costa Rica is a Central
‘American county that
‘borers on both the
Pacific Ocean and the
Caribbean arm o the
Atfantc Ocean, Although
Costa Rica is largely
an agricuitural country, i
North Pacific has transformed itset to
Ocean include stronger
technology and tourism
sectors.
- J
Satz.
\ tated
Costa Rica, tke al cher countries, has used international rade and tactr mbilty ples to help it
‘achleve its economic objectives, These policies are claselyimtertwined with what and how much a coun-
{ry pracuces. They change over time as home country conditions progress and as foreign market and
‘competitive situations unfold. These policies also refact views of different politcal leaders in terms of
‘her economic oioities and their convictions on what will work and what wl not. Although Costa Rican
Policies have continually evelved, they generally fl nto four basic categories anc periads. They are:
* 1800-1960, liberal trade regime (minimal government interference in wade and investment)
* 1860-1982, import substtuion (seeking local production ot goods and services that would other-
\wise be importee)
* 1983-early 1990s, Iberatzaton of imports, export promotion, and ncentves fr foreign investments
Early 19808-precent time, strategic trade and investment policy (seeking production of specific
‘ypes of products) and openness to importsTheories and institutions: Trade and Investment
18008-1960,
In the tattar part ofthe 1800s, most countries adopted polices whereby goods, capita, and people cous
move fairy freely trom one couriry to another. A the same time, government interfered minimaly to sup-
fort particule industries. The result wes that individual producers determined what and where to praduce
Under this regime, trade flourished and countries specialized in seling what they could produce best. Mast
Latin American countries specialize inte production of a single or 2 few commodities (rw matertals or
agricultural products), which they exported in exchange for other commodtties and manufactured goods
Costa ica was no exception, and it flowed tis regime uti the early 1960s. farmers specialized fst in
coffee and later as well, in bananas aftr the development of refrigerated ships Far most of the perlod, this
regime promoted economic development for Costa Rica Uecause commodity prices, especialy cotes
prices, were high, However, the accumulation of several experiences convinced Costa Rican leaders tb aact
‘government programs to dversiy production and become more sett-sufficent. These included its trade dis-
ruptions during two world wars, the lowering of coflee and banana prices relative to prices of manufactured
products 2s new commodity production (especialy in rican counties) competed in word markets, and a
‘ealiation that Lain American countries with less open international markets had insulated themseWves
‘more from aoverse international condtions. Asa reut, Costa Rica tured to import substitution,
1960-1982
Import substitution is a poicy of developing industies to make products that would otherwise be imports
Costa Rican authorities reasoned that if they limited imports, such as by taxing them heavily, bth Casta Rican
and foreign investors would have an incentive to produce more things win Costa fica for Casta Rcan con-
sumers, At the same time authorites realized that Costa Rica's market was to smal to Support investments
requiring large-scale production. To help mitigate tis problem, Casta Rica joined four other countries
(Ei Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) in forming the Central American Common Market (CACM to
alow goods produced in ay member county te enter rely nto the ater member counties. Thus, company
‘ight be more wing to invest o serve afive-country market than simply a one-courtry market
The resus of import substtution policies were moved. Costa Rca a aversity ts economy by becom
ing less dependent on agriculture (25.2 percent of GOP in 1960 versus 18 percent in 1980); however, the
shift was even greater in the 1960-1960 period—from 40.9 percent af GOP to 25.2 percent when the gov-
‘stnment interfered itl to transform the economy. Some foreign Investment oid enter in the manutact
ing area but mainly just o serve the Costa Rican, rather than the entre CACM market, For example, there
‘was considerable imgort substitution in the pharmaceutical industry where small-scale packaging and
processing is ecient, Simply, nether local nar foreign investors were convinced that the CACM would be
an enduring arrangement. Their skepticism was well founded. By the late 1970s the CACM was efectivay
inoperative. Civil wars in both Ei Salvador and Guatemala stied those economies, Nicaragua vecame
ideologically committed to governmental contol overall aspects of is ecanomy including trade, and
Salvador and Honduras fought a bre but consequential war.
In some cases, import subsitin also edt increases in expos, tke Costa Rican processing of such r-
citonal exports 2s coffee and cotton seeds fr both local and export markets Neverthaess, economists 7
concemed thatthe palces to protect local production iprice contol, Import prohibitions, and subsicies) were
shiting Costa Rican resources away from thase products that it could produce most efficient. For exami,
Costa Rca became nearly selt-sutficient in ce production during this period, but only because government
policies kept lower-cost oreign-oraduced rice from entering the market. At the seme time, Costa Rica placed
contofs on consumer prices a rice. Meanviile, efficient industries caus not expand fut because they had 12
ay more taxes to support subsides going to inafcent producers, Further, higher consumer prices on many
products gave people less disposable income Given the concerns, Costa Rican policymakers casoned tha tid
country must emphasize tution of goods that coud ve competitive in international markets. These pofci~
‘makers were also inuenced by the fact that some Asian cous had achieved ecent rapid arowth by eind
ccmpettive internationally. Thus, Costa Rica shifted to an export promation poy in 1983.CHAPTER 6 International Trade and Factor Mobility Theory
& 1983-EARLY 1990s
sonst Rca began removing import barriers so that only internationally competitive companice and
"industries would likely survive, For example, Costa Rican imports of rice increased substantially as the
government decreased protection of domestic production, Paicymakers also reasoned that the country
would nee outsige caltal and experts to transform the economy. At abou he same te the United
stats established the Caribbean Basin Intiativ, whereby procucs originating from the Caribbean
cei (nluding Gosta Ale) could enter the United Stats ata lower tari Ggort ay than products
angina e'seviere. To capitalize onthe new opportunty to export to the United States, Costa fica
‘ured CINDE, private organization funded by the Costa ican government and grants by the US. gov
ernment. The purpose of CINDE was to develop the economy, and one ofits top rors was to atact
forcign dec investment To augment CINDE's work, Costa Rica established an Export Processing Zane
(2) that allowed companies (a long a8 they were exporing their ished ouput io impor ll ther
inputs and equipment tax fee, to avoid gaying Costa Rican income tax freight year, and to pay oniy
50 percent ofthe income tax rate forthe next four years, 8y 1989, 36 comoaries had located in te EP2
These were mainly texte and footwear producer that sought Casta Rica's pool af inexpensive labor
However, Oy his time CINDE officials word about two factors—(i) that Costa Rca coud not cemain