Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Eshaghian et al.
1. INTRODUCTION
Plasmonic integrated circuits are among the promising candidates that can help us to go beyond the limitations of todays
electrical and optical integrated circuits. The optimistic view
of the future of plasmonics stems from the fact that metallic
nanostructures in plasmonic circuitry can manipulate the flow
of light to realize miscellaneous functionalities within a subwavelength scale [111]. In particular, dielectric nanoslots
carved in thin metallic films, i.e., nanoplasmonic slot waveguides, have been of much interest in recent years [1215],
especially because they can be monolithically integrated on
a CMOS platform and also can realize nanoscale plasmonic
chip-to-chip interconnections.
Regretfully, the efficiency of light transmission through
sharply bent single mode nanoplasmonic slot waveguides
is quite low at near infrared wavelengths [16,17]; and thus,
there is no bending flexibility. This is a serious obstacle to
overcome since lack of bending flexibility challenges largescale integration [18]. It is worth noting that despite the
geometric similitude between the three-dimensional nanoplasmonic slot waveguide and its two-dimensional counterpart, i.e., the metal-dielectric-metal (MDM) waveguide [16],
the former bears a much higher level of bending loss than does
the latter [1621]. This should not come as a surprise since the
fundamental mode of the former is by no means similar to that
of the latter [2224].
The most straightforward approach to decrease the bending loss of nanoplasmonic slot waveguides is to round the
sharp corners [13,17]. Unfortunately, rounding the sharp corner of a 90 bend by using a bending radius of about tens of
nanometers cannot enhance the transmission significantly
[17]. Rather, the bending radius of the structure should be
about a few micrometers [25,26]. Still, this is not a promising
solution because the overall length of wave propagation is
increased in this manner from nanometers to micrometers.
0740-3224/14/030458-06$15.00/0
The increased length of wave propagation imposes two certain difficulties. First and foremost, it does not remedy the
bending flexibility issue as it necessitates larger chip footprint
area. Second, it incurs a higher level of Ohmic loss and
thereby counterweights the lower level of radiation loss
[26]. One other straightforward approach to increase the
transmission efficiency of sharply bent nanoplasmonic slot
waveguides is to increase the mode confinement [17]. In
this way, however, the reduction of leakage from the bend
is bought at the expense of increased per-unit-length
propagation loss constant and multimode operation [23,24].
Therefore, bending loss reduction in nanoplasmonic slot
waveguides remains in want of a more creative approach.
Recently, a creative attempt at increasing the transmission
efficiency of sharply bent nanoplasmonic slot waveguides has
been made by insertion of a metallic pillar at the corner of the
bend [16]. It is worth noting that the same idea had been
already employed for reduction of the reflection loss in
sharply bent V grooves [27]. The major role of the pillar in
these works is to reduce the reflection loss via destructive
interference. Unfortunately, the unwanted power leakage
from the bend is not significantly affected by the pillar. The
high level of power transmission in this work (about 92%)
is not much indebted to the presence of pillars. Rather, it is
indebted to the fact that the height of V groove is significantly
larger than the penetration depth of the fundamental mode
within the groove. The cost to be paid is multimode operation
of the waveguide. Therefore, the transmission efficiency is not
considerably enhanced even when the pillar is present. The
low level of transmission is a more pronounced issue in the
near infrared regime, where the structure becomes more
prone to leakage because the electromagnetic energy is more
concentrated around the edge corners at shorter wavelengths
[24]. It is for this reason that the transmission efficiency
of sharply bent nanoplasmonic slot waveguides in the near
2014 Optical Society of America
Eshaghian et al.
2. REDUCTION OF OUT-OF-PLANE
LEAKAGE
The sharply bent nanoplasmonic slot waveguide to be studied
in this paper is schematically shown in Fig. 1. Its height and
width are denoted by h and w, respectively. A uniform dielectric of refractive index n fills the slot and the surrounding regions. Without loss of generality, it is assumed that n 1.5,
and the metallic region is made of silver whose permittivity
can be approximated by the well-known Drudes model [28]:
m
2p
;
i
(1)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
459
0.82
0.84
0.86
0.88
Wavelength, m
0.9
460
Eshaghian et al.
0.35
Normalized Power
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
50
100
150
200
250
Distance from the upper surface, m
300
Fig. 4. Schematic of the proposed structure for reduction of the outof-plane leakage.
Eshaghian et al.
461
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Fig. 7. (a) First type pillar defect. (b) Transmission (solid line),
reflection (dashed), and the overall loss (dotted) of the structure with
w1 w2, and d 40 nm.
0.1
0
0.82
0.84
0.86
0.88
Wavelength, nm
0.9
L
;
w
(2)
Fig. 8. (a) Second type pillar defect. (b) Transmission (solid line),
reflection (dashed), and overall loss (dotted) of sharp bend with
w1 w2, d 40 nm, and w2 w4.
462
Eshaghian et al.
(3)
the sharp bends with and without the three different types
of here-proposed defects is plotted in Fig. 10. Comparison
of Figs. 10(b) and 10(a) shows that the first type defect
can ameliorate the asymmetry of the transmitted profile
at the expense of increased reflection. Comparison of
Figs. 10(b) and 10(c) shows that the second type defect
can partly decrease the increased level of reflection without
imposing asymmetry on the transmitted profile. Comparison
of Figs. 10(c) and 10(d) shows that the destructive interference can further reduce the unwanted reflection and increase
the desired transmission. The destructive interference held by
Eq. (3) has successfully suppressed the standing wave pattern
at the right-hand side of the input arm of the bend.
It is worth noting that the presence of patches is beneficial
for reduction of the out-of-plane leakage only. Regretfully, this
reduction is bought at the expense of increased level of back
reflection. Therefore, if one is more interested in reducing the
back reflection rather than increasing the transmission then
one can remove the metallic patches. Numerical calculation
shows that while back reflection with patches is about 4%
at the free space wavelength of 850 nm, the back reflection
in the structure without patches is as low as 1%. The lowest
achievable back reflection depends on the wavelength and
can be even smaller than 1% for longer wavelengths. Although
it is possible to reach very low level of back reflection via simple pillar defects already reported in [16], the third type pillar
defect reported here decreases the unwanted effects of the
inevitable bending momentum mismatch, compensates the
imposed phase difference between the waves that travel along
the outer and inner edges of the bend, and thereby provides
higher level of overall transmission.
4. CONCLUSION
Fig. 9. (a) Third type pillar defect. (b) Transmission (solid line),
reflection (dashed), and the overall loss (dotted) of sharp bend with
w1 w2, d 40 nm, w2 w4, and l0 80 nm.
Eshaghian et al.
of slot width nor the removal of the sharp outer corner of the
bend can considerably enhance the bending performance of
the standard nanoplasmonic slot waveguide. The overall loss
of a sharp 90 bend in nanoplasmonic slot waveguides is substantial (over 50%) and the back reflection is non-negligible
(over 10%). Since a certain fraction of the incoming power
is vertically carried away from the bend, two metallic patches
were employed in this paper to suppress out-of-plane power
leakage from the bend. The in-plane power leakage was then
reduced by balancing the electrical length of the plasmon
modes propagating along the inner and outer edges of the slot
waveguide. This step was carried out via a square bulge protruding from the inner corner of the bend. It was shown that
the overall loss significantly drops down when the asymmetry
between the inner and outer corners of the bend is eliminated.
Finally, the shape of the outer corner of the bend was modified to reduce the back reflection via destructive interference
between the forward and backward waves travelling within
the slot region. It was shown that the fraction of power transmitted through the sharp 90 bend in the modified nanoplasmonic slot waveguide can exceed 80% at near infrared
wavelength, where the effect of loss is more pronounced.
The proposed approach can be followed to enhance the bending performance of similar structures, and it is not restricted
to the narrow spectral range of 810910 nm. At the free space
wavelength of 1300 nm for instance, neither the size nor the
location of the metallic patches needs any change. The only
parameter that should be recalculated in our design methodology is d. Thanks to the algebraic closed form expression
given in Eq. (3) and since l0 d w2, the optimum value
of d can be straightforwardly found at any free space wavelength. It should be however pointed out that the height of the
slot waveguide can be increased without incurring multimode
operation if the free space wavelength is large enough. Therefore, there are easier methods to increase the transmission
efficiency at larger free space wavelengths. The major benefit
of our proposed methodology is more pronounced when we
consider shorter wavelengths.
REFERENCES
S. A. Maier and H. A. Atwater, Plasmonics: localization and
guiding of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 011101 (2005).
2. S. Hal, S. Link, and N. Halas, Nano-optics from sensing to waveguiding, Nat. Photonics 1, 641648 (2007).
3. T. W. Ebbesen, C. Genet, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Surfaceplasmon circuitry, Phys. Today 61(5), 4450 (2008).
4. D. K. Gramotnev and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Plasmonics beyond the
diffraction limit, Nat. Photonics 4, 8391 (2010).
5. J. A. Schuller, E. S. Barnard, W. Cai, Y. C. Jun, J. S. White, and
M. L. Brongersma, Plasmonics for extreme light concentration
and manipulation, Nat. Mater. 9, 193204 (2010).
6. H. A. Atwater, The promise of plasmonics, Scientific American
296(4), 5663 (2007).
7. L. O. Diniz, F. D. Nunes, E. Marega, J. Weiner, and B.-H. V.
Borges, Metalinsulatormetal surface plasmon polariton
waveguide filters with cascaded transverse cavities, J. Lightwave Technol. 29, 714720 (2011).
8. M. Bahadori, A. Eshaghian, H. Hodaei, M. Rezaei, and K.
Mehrany, Analysis and design of optical demultiplexer based
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
1.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
463