Sei sulla pagina 1di 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry

DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD): Fundamentals and Applications from

Nano- to Micro-Scale Structures
Pouya Amrollahia, Jerzy S. Krasinskib, Ranji Vaidyanathana, Lobat Tayebia,c* and Daryoosh Vashaeeb,d*
Helmerich Advanced Technology Research Center, School of Material Science and Engineering, Oklahoma State University,
Tulsa, OK, USA
Helmerich Advanced Technology Research Center, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State
University, Tulsa, OK, USA
Department of Developmental Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

EPD is a technique where charged particles in a stable colloidal suspension are moved through the liquid
due to electric eld and deposited on an oppositely charged conductive substrate, forming the intended
material or device. EPD enables fabrication of a wide range of structures from traditional to advanced
materials, from nanometric thin lms to a fraction of 1 mm thick lms, and from porous scaffolds to
highly compact coatings. These structures include different compositions with complex shapes and
structures which can be formed in a relatively short experimentation time by simple apparatus. This
review presents the fundamentals, mechanisms, and characteristics of EPD along with its past and recent

Electrophoretic deposition (EPD); Ceramic materials; Biomedical materials; Thermoelectric materials;
Materials fabrication

Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) is a material processing technique using deposition of charged particles
in a stable colloidal suspension on a conductive substrate, acting as one of the two oppositely charged
electrodes in the EPD cell. The deposited particles form the intended material or device [1]. Both
alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) electrical elds have been applied in EPD process,
although DC elds are more common [13]. Highly versatile application, simple apparatus and equipment, short processing time, cost effectiveness, facile modication, desirable dense packing of particles in
the nal piece, high quality of the microstructures produced, easy production of geometrically complicated shapes and simple control of the thickness and morphology have made EPD an interesting technique
both in academia and industry [1, 4]. In EPD, the state of particles in suspension and their evolution during
the process can be controlled and manipulated. Moreover, appropriate and accurate choice of processing
variables could enable production of dense and homogeneous or porous microstructures. A combustible
substrate that can be removed by further heating in sintering process is used for fabricating complicated
Page 1 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 1 Four steps of EPD; (a) dispersion, (b) electrochemical charging, (c) electrophoresis and (d) deposition

shapes. But for coatings, the operator needs to be very cautious about possible cracks due to drying and
sintering. These thermally derived cracks are the impartible nature of the technique and the quality of the
nal surface depends on overcoming this problem.
This process was discovered by Bose in a liquid-siphon experiment during the 1740s [5] and has been
known since Ruess observed the movement of clay particles in water under an electrical eld [6]. The rst
practical use of this technique was done by Harsanyi [7] in 1927 in order to deposit thoria (thorium
(IV) oxide) and tungsten on a platinum cathode as an emitter for electron tube applications. The rst largescale application of EPD dates back to early 1950s, when the scientists used this method to make
insulating Al2O3 layers on cathode heaters in vacuum tubes [8].
An EPD cell contains four different parts: working electrodes (substrate and counter electrode),
colloidal suspension, and power supply (AC or DC).
Despite the fact that many mechanisms have been proposed for EPD, there are several unquestionable
characteristics to distinguish EPD from other similar deposition-based techniques. As it can be seen in
Fig. 1, (a) colloidal particles are well dispersed and able to move freely and independently in solvent
suspension, (b) electrochemical equilibrium of the solvent is responsible for particles surface charge,
(c) particles move electrophoretically in the bulk of the suspension to the oppositely charged electrode
(substrate), and (d) the substrate is covered by a neutralized, rmly deposited layer of particles. Therefore,
EPD is a technique where moving species are solid particles, required conductance of the liquid medium is
low, and the organic liquids are preferred. In EPD, the liquid stays motionless while particles and ions
move under the electrostatic force [4].
Like in any other system, it is absolutely essential to avoid contamination or impurity that can
unfavorably inuence the properties of the process and/or resulting materials. As the characteristics of
the resulting materials are highly dependent on stability of suspension and control on surface charge,

Page 2 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 2 Suppression of bubbles by applying constant current pulses (a-alumina deposited on stainless steel substrates)
(Reprinted from Besra et al. [11], Copyright (2009), with permission from Elsevier)

powder washing multiple times before preparation of a particulate suspension is mandatory in order to
eliminate the residual impurities caused by the powder preparation procedure [9].
Generally, it is preferred to use organic liquids as the suspending medium in an EPD cell even though
they are dangerous, expensive, and unfriendly to the environment. However, in aqueous EPD, one needs
much lower voltage, we have more control on temperature, and deposition takes place faster. Also, water
is much more environmental friendly. Unfortunately, electrolysis of water generates gas bubbles that
drastically compromise the quality of the deposited layer. It has been reported that application of short
voltage pulses in an aqueous EPD system can suppress the bubble incorporation [10, 11]. Figure 2
demonstrates complete suppression of bubbles during aqueous electrophoresis of a-alumina thin lm,
deposited on stainless steel (316 L) substrate by applying periodically pulsed voltage. As can be seen,
bubble-free deposits were obtained at pulses equal to or shorter than 5 m. It has also been reported that
constant current rather than constant voltage depositions are more efcient and can provide better control
over the EPD process.
Table 1 lists selected signicant applications of EPD in various elds.
EPD process involves four steps. First, a stable suspension of particles is needed. Since the particles
only need to be stable within the time frame between dispersing to depositing processes, which can be as
short as a few minutes, various stabilization techniques may be utilized such as low concentration, proper
charging of the particles, polymer depletion, polyelectrolyte, block copolymer, and homopolymer
adsorption [72]. In electrostatic technique, creation of an energy barrier between 10 and 15 kT prevents
the particles from attaching to each other. In polymer depletion, a concentration of soluble polymer which
cannot be adsorbed to the particle surfaces is used to prevent them from sticking together. Other polymeric
stabilization methods necessitate a polymer where one side of it can be attached to the particle, while the
other side is dissolved in the solvent [72]. As the second step, a solvent able to enable ionic charge is
required where adsorption/dissolution equilibria for a positive and negative ion are different. The next
step is electrophoretic migration of particles under the inuence of electric eld. During electrochemical
charging of particles, the solvent must be able to dissolve ions; because a solvent with no or a minute
concentration of dissolved ions drastically increase the required voltage across the cell. Electrochemical
reactions at the electrodes guarantee the change in the valence of ions in order to prevent ions from
screening the electric eld at the electrode surface. Moreover, absence of these reactions would lead to fast
migration of ions to oppositely charged electrodes after applying a voltage. The last step is deposition of
particles on one of the electrodes. As there are various mechanisms for both stabilizing and destabilizing
of the particles (in the rst and fourth steps), there is no single mechanism for EPD.

Page 3 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Table 1 Applications of EPD


Oriented ceramic materials

Multilayered composites


Thermoelectric thick lms

Particle size separation
Deposition of nanotubes


Solar cells
Reinforced composites
Thick lm optical modulators

Batteries and electrochemical



Solid oxide fuel cells


Corrosion-resistant coatings
Catalyst support and molecular
Piezoelectric materials
Biomedical materials


Fabricating crystalline oriented thick lms
Textured TiO2
Textured alumina
Multi-layered alumina
Fabricating functionally gradient, multi-layer composites and
sandwich structures
Si-Ge thick-lms
SnO2 particles
Graphene synthesis
SiO2/CNT composites
CNT/TiO2 composites
MnO2/CNT composites
Fe3O4/CNT composites
Hydroxyapatite/CNT composites
Bioactive glass/CNT composites
Dye sensitized solar cells
SiC ber reinforced composites
WO3 nano rods
ZnO thin lms
Lithium ion batteries
Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2
Perovskite structures
CeO2 lms
Silica hybrid coatings
PPy coated tubes

[6, 12, 13]
[17, 18]
[29, 30]
[36, 37]
[38, 39]

Gas sensors
PZT actuators
Forming biocompatible layers
Porous scaffolds
Corrosion protection of implants

[58, 59]

Mechanisms of EPD
There are several mechanisms by which the particles come together and form a rigid solid structure.
Combining them with the abovementioned dispersing techniques leads to different EPD mechanisms
although the exact mechanisms which allow deposition of particles on the substrate are still not
completely understood.
It has been suggested that EPD should be considered as a two-step process, where particles rst migrate
to the substrate due to the applied electric eld (the particles lose their charge at the electrode surface) and
then after complex electrochemical reactions and aggregation the deposited layer is formed.

Page 4 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Table 2 Different mechanisms of EPD [72]

(a) Particle stabilization at substrate
Low number density
Polymer depletion
Homo-polymer adsorption
Block co-polymer

(b) EPD layer formation mechanisms

Direct electrostatic force
Ion depletion enhanced electrostatic
Desorption of neutral/charged polymer
Charge reduction/neutralization
Squeezing out
Bridging occulation

Electrophoretic motion of the particles is stopped by the substrate and the density of the particles will
keep increasing there, due to accumulation. If those particles agglomerate, a low-density deposit may
form which is difcult to dry without cracking. In this mechanism, there is no guarantee that the thickness
of the layer remains uniform all over the substrate; since the nonuniformity of the electric eld can lead to
a very nonuniform deposit.
If the applied electric eld is powerful enough (around several hundred volts per cm), it is also possible
that deposition takes place via suppressing the electrostatic repulsion with the electric eld. In this
mechanism, the electrical force gradient has to be low in order to make an even deposit [73, 74], although
some irregularities may occur due to strong electroconvection.
The next approach is occulation of the particles by electrosedimentation [72]. It was found that a
stable suspension can produce strongly adhering sediment. Sediment is formed in the innermost layer of
the particles due to gravitation plus the pressure made by electrically induced ow of particles to the
substrate. Although the density of the deposited layer is very good, the charge of the layer confronts the
electrochemical charge of the solvent and acts as the driving force reducing the electrophoretic force in the
layer. This instability can cause convection within the layer of particles before they are deposited on the
substrate [75, 76].
Decrease in total ionic concentration around the substrate can raise the voltage gradient and, by quelling
the convection, conduction occurs between unbalanced ions as a consequence. This effect results in
raising the voltage gradient to mega volts per meter. These layers are very convectively unstable.
Preservation of the surface charge of the particles results in a very strong compacting force that can
make a powerful leveling effect when it is accompanied by high voltage gradient. This mechanism leads
to forming very even thin layer [77].
On the contrary, it has also been reported that an increase in ionic concentration at the substrate makes
the electrostatic boundary layer of particles thinner and thinner until they become unstable and the deposit
is formed [78].
The particles may lose their charge and neutralize after contacting the substrate and make a thin deposit.
This mechanism continues until the deposited layer gets thick, the particlesubstrate interactions are
stopped, or the pH level changes around the substrate [72].
It has been reported that repulsive forces between the particles can be reduced only when the electrode
reactions generate (OH) ions [4]. The calculated amount of ionic strength around the substrate was
sufcient for occulation of the suspension. Interparticle repulsion decreases when near-substrate electrolyte concentration is increased. Consequently, the zeta potential is lowered and occulation of particles
is induced.
In the case of polymers, it has been reported that when electrophoretic force brings the particles
together, branches of a copolymer can be detached from one particle and attach to a neighbor particle and
make a polymer bridge that holds these particles together [72]. Another deposition mechanism for
Page 5 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Table 3 Parameters governing EPD

Suspension parameters
Particle size
Dielectric constant, conductivity and viscosity
Zeta potential
Concentration of solids

Process parameters
Applied electric eld
Deposition time
Conductivity of the substrate

polymers is called squeezing out, where a constant stable electrophoretic force brings two polymers into
contact and deposit. Furthermore, in some cases, changing the solvent ionic composition leads to an
alteration in particle surface potential and polymer particles can be stabilized [72]. Table 2 summarizes the
mechanisms through which (a) particles stabilize at the substrate and (b) EPD takes place.

Process Variables
There are two sets of parameters which can affect both EPD process and the resulting specimen: rst,
parameters that control the status and quality of suspension, and then the parameters which qualify the
whole process, such as electrical parameters. When the rst group is xed, the latter can be manipulated
for gaining favorable deposition. Table 3 summarizes the possible parameters that can be manipulated in
order to get the desired properties and quality in the deposited lm.

Suspension Parameters
Particle Size
Uniformity of the deposited layer is tightly tied to whether or not the particles remain stable and dispersed
throughout the whole process, because, motionless and accumulated particles lead to the formation of
gradient in deposition. In case of larger particles, there is always a competition between the gravity and
electrophoresis forces. The rst one result in sedimentation of the powder while the latter deposits the
particles on the substrate. In this situation, when EPD is completed, surface charge is highly increased
and/or the electrical double layer region is thickened.
Dielectric Constant, Conductivity, and Viscosity of Suspension
It has been reported that the dielectric constant of the liquids must be in the range of 1225 for deposition
to happen [1]. In liquids with dielectric constants less than 12, lack of dissociative power stalls the
deposition, while in liquids with dielectric constants higher than 25, electrophoresis is halted by the
reduction in size of the double layer region, caused by high ionic concentration.
Impurities can also change the conductivity of the suspension. Moreover, the method used for
preparing the suspension also affects the conductivity drastically. A highly resistive suspension leads to
instability because electronically originated charge forms in the particles. On the other hand, proper
adjustment of temperature and dispersant concentration can raise the conductivity. Research has shown
that, for each exact dispersant concentration and each temperature, there is a narrow conductivity range
which enhances the deposition process [79]. Generally, an ideal suspension has high dielectric constant,
low conductivity and low viscosity. Table 4 shows viscosity and relative dielectric constant of some
popular solvents [80], ordered from best to worst. Methanol and acetone are the rst two best solvents.
However, comparing these two, methanol has higher dielectric constant while acetone has a viscosity of

Page 6 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Table 4 Physical properties of solvents

Ethylene glycol

Viscosity cP 103 N:s:m2


Relative dielectric constant


almost half of methanol. Therefore, acetone can be considered as the best solvent for making an ideal
Zeta Potential
Zeta potential governs several key parameters in EPD, such as the density of the deposit, particle direction
and speed, and the repulsive interactions between the particles which determine the stability of the
suspension. Generally, a high surface charge is needed not only to avoid particle agglomeration but
also to enable formation of a dense highly packed deposit. Zeta potential manipulation is done through
addition of acids, bases, and adsorbed ions.
Stability of Suspension
Finding the best state of stability of the suspension is a matter of compromise. When the suspension is
stable, occulation does not happen and a thick adherent material deposits at the bottom of the cell due to
sedimentation. Too much stability disables EPD, because a high electric eld is needed to defeat the
repulsive forces between particles. Conversely, a occulating suspension just forms thin nonadhering
Concentration of Solids in Suspension
High concentrations of solids in suspension enable uniform and even deposition rates, while low
concentrations lead to deposition rates proportional to electrophoretic mobility of each particle [81].

Process Parameters
Effect of Applied Electric Field
As there are both intended particles and free ions in the suspension, a portion of the electric eld, which is
the driving force of EPD, is carried by the free ions and the eld efciency is compromised. However,
when we cannot limit the presence of free ions, the amount of current carried by them is insignicant.
Ideally, the applied electric eld must be totally spent on advancement of the electrophoresis in a stablecurrent manner, because the deposition increases in direct relation with raising the applied potential.
While too low elds are not capable of triggering the electrophoresis, with too high applied electrical
elds, the quality of the deposits is sacriced. It has been suggested that the best quality of deposits are
gained at moderate applied elds. Moreover, a high electric eld can cause turbulence in the suspension,
which compromises the quality of the resulting deposit. Also, it increases the speed of the particles and
consequently they cannot have the chance to be seated in the best position, which makes the formation of a
dense close-packed structure impossible [82].
Page 7 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Effect of Deposition Time

In EPD, the deposition rate starts with a linear relationship to time and then it lowers as time goes on, until
the deposit is thick enough to interrupt the conductance and the deposition rate reaches plateau at high
deposition times.
Conductivity of Substrate
In EPD, the quality of the deposited lm is strongly dependent on the conductivity of the substrate. Low
conductivity of the substrate leads to both slow deposition and nonuniformity of the deposit [47].

Oriented Ceramic Materials
EPD has been given special attention as the leading ceramic electrodeposition technique in the last
decades [13, 83]. This technique has revolutionized advanced ceramic materials processing both in
academia and industry. In ceramic industries, thin ceramic lms can be achieved from colloidal suspensions. In recent years, the attractive characteristics of EPD have made it a potential alternative approach
for many purposes in several elds. For example, EPD has been reported as a promising technique for
fabricating crystalline oriented thick lms [6, 12, 13, 16]. Titanium oxide, which has three crystallographic polymorphs (anatase, rutile, and brookite), has been widely used in different areas due to its
remarkable optical characteristics. In another study [14], it has been shown that EPD in a strong magnetic
eld enables taking advantage of magnetic anisotropy of materials with asymmetric crystalline structures
to produce layers of aligned crystalline magnetic particles. The crystal anisotropy produces the driving
force (DF) of this magnetic alignment and it is described by Eq. 1 [15],
DF DxVB2 =2m0


where Dx is the difference between susceptibilities parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic principal
axis, V is the volume of the material, B is the applied magnetic eld, and m0 is the permeability in a
vacuum. Figure 3 depicts a schematic view of the EPD cell in this investigation.
TiO2 powder was sonicated in distilled water at pH 5.5, and then polyethylenimine (PEI) was added to
improve stability of the suspension. PEI modied the zeta potential of the powder. The EPD was done in
presence of magnetic eld at current density of 2.7 mA/cm2. As a result, the magnetic eld xes the

Fig. 3 Schematic view of EPD under high magnetic eld; (a) suspension, (b) magnetic orientation and (c) preferred deposition
(Reprinted from Uchikoshi et al. [16], Copyright (2004), with permission from Elsevier)
Page 8 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 4 XRD pattern of the top and side planes of deposited anatase (Reprinted from Uchikoshi et al. [14], Copyright (2006),
with permission from Elsevier)

Fig. 5 SEM image of cross-section of diamond/diamond laminates (Reprinted from Dzepina et al. [22], Copyright (2013),
with permission from Elsevier)

orientation of each particle and the crystalline structure of polycrystalline TiO2 can be controlled
[14]. Figure 4 shows the XRD pattern of the top and side planes of the deposited anatase.
a-alumina is an interesting engineering material [17]. Possibility of fabrication of textured alumina by
EPD was also investigated [18]. High purity ne a-alumina and hexagonal alumina platelets as matrix
powder and template were used. The matrix powder was milled for 24 h in ethanol and 0.5 vol%
de-ionized water. Platelets were then added to the suspension with n-butylamine and Dolapix Ce-64
(Dolapix is an anionic polyelectrolyte dispersant that contains ammonium salt of polymethacrylic acid
[84]) in order to negatively charge and disperse the particles. The pH of the suspension was at 11.5 for the
whole 450-s duration of the procedure. As a result, (001) alumina texture was obtained.

Multilayered Composites
Another group reported enhanced mechanical properties in textured, multilayered alumina produced via
EPD [19]. It has also been reported that EPD is capable of fabricating functionally gradient and multilayer
composites and sandwich structures [2022]. Functionally graded materials are advanced composite
Page 9 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

160 m


Si0.8Ge0.2 film

200 m

Thick Film

Silicon Substrate

Fig. 6 (a) SEM image and (b) photograph of Si80Ge20 EPD coating sintered on silicon substrate (Reprinted from
Nozariasbmarz et al. [23], Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier)

materials which consist of different layers with different mechanical properties and are able to alleviate
problems associated with interfaces of different materials [85, 86]. Polycrystalline diamond has wide
applications in for cutting and grinding in machining, mining and oil industries. Researchers have been
successful in electrophoresis of diamond powder which was rst acid washed and then boiled and rinsed
in HCl solution and distilled water. Figure 5 shows a SEM image of diamond/diamond laminates formed
by electrophoretic deposition of diamond powders with different concentrations in HCl solution. Directcurrent EPD on tungsten carbide substrates was conducted at a constant voltage of 1.5 for 7.5 min for each
layer [22]. Due to the high accuracy of EPD [1], sandwich-structured materials can be fabricated after
several steps in both single-bath and multi-baths experiments [22].

Thermoelectric Thick Films

Recently our research group has been successful in improving the thermoelectric power factor of SiGe
thick lms through electrophoresis of elemental Si and Ge powders [23]. For a highly efcient thermoelectric device, the resistance of the ohmic contact must be much smaller than the resistance of the
thermoelectric element. Therefore, the length of the device must be bigger than the ratio of the specic
ohmic contact resistance to the resistivity of the thermoelectric material. Computational simulation
studies show that a thickness of more than a few tens of micrometers is needed to satisfy this criterion
[87]. The small heights of the thermoelectric legs introduce complexity for making simultaneous
electrical contacts to the entire thermoelectric array. Even a small height variation in one leg can lead to
open circuit failure of the whole module. EPD has shown great capabilities in making lms with
thicknesses from submicron to hundreds of micron, while maintaining the composition of the starting
materials with stoichiometric ratios. In that project, our group prepared Si80Ge20 powder via milling and
then sonicated the resulting material in acetone for 2 h in order to avoid any agglomeration and achieve a
homogeneously dispersed colloidal solution. Silicon wafer was used as the substrate and it was etched in
buffered oxide etch solution for 2 min, and then washed with deionized water to remove the native SiO2.
The process was carried out in a custom-made cell under a constant voltage of 30 V at room temperature.
After that, the sample was dried at room temperature and then cold pressed under 30 MPa pressure.
Afterward, the coated substrate was sintered for 3 h at 1200  C in nitrogen atmosphere. Figure 6 shows a
SEM image and a photograph of Si80Ge20 layered on silicon substrate. Formation of dense and uniform
layers of Si80Ge20 can be seen in Fig. 6a, while Fig. 6b shows the overall uniformity of the thick lms.
Seebeck coefcient and electrical conductivity measurements from the room temperature to 950  C
showed that the thermoelectric power factor of Si80Ge20 thick lm is approximately
1:9  103 W:m1 :K2 , which is an order of magnitude larger than the previously achieved values for
thin lms of this material.

Page 10 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 7 Deposition of (a) particles on CNTs, (b) CNTs on particles, and (c) co-deposition of CNTs and particles (Reprinted
from Boccaccini et al. [25], Copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier)

Particle Size Separation

Particle size separation is another capacity of EPD [24]. In one investigation, two parallel nonconductive
electrodes were attached to borosilicate glass by gold paste. SnO2 particles were dispersed in pure acetone
and alternating-current EPD was done at 40 V for 10 min. It has been shown that increasing the frequency
of the AC eld leads to narrowing of the size distribution curve [24].

Deposition of Nanotubes
EPD has been used to improve carbon nanotubes (CNTs), to make CNT-composites, and for graphene
synthesis [2527]. Various composites including SiO2/CNT [28], CNT/TiO2 [29, 30], MnO2/CNT [31],
Fe3O4/CNT [32], hydroxyapatite/CNT [3335], and bioactive glass/CNT composites [36, 37] have been
made using homogeneous dispersion of CNTs in an appropriate solvent. Fibers coated with single-walled
CNTs, which can be used for extracting phenols from aqueous solutions, have also been prepared by
electrophoresis of a suspension of CNTs in dimethylformamide at a constant voltage of 40 V for 10 s [88].
Figure 7 shows different outcomes of EPD made CNT/ceramic nanocomposites. Depending on the
conditions sometimes ceramic or metallic particles are deposited on CNTs, in other cases CNTs are
coagulated onto particles, and it is also possible to achieve simultaneous deposition of CNTs and particles.

Dye Sensitized Solar Cells

Efcient dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) can be made through multiple EPDs [38, 39]. DSSCs are
photovoltaic devices with high conversion efciency [89] and their properties were modied after EPD at
constant voltage of 10 V for 20 15-s cycles at 25  C and further annealing (Fig. 8a). Figure 8b shows the
enhanced efciency of these cells by increasing the number of the layers.

SiC Fiber Reinforced Composites

SiC-ber-reinforced composites have a great potential to be used for fusion reactors due to their
remarkable resistance against neutron ux [90, 91]. EPD production of these composites [40] led to the
idea that the quality and density obtained in this procedure is highly correlated with the zeta potential of
the charged particles. The experiment was conducted at constant voltage of 60 V for 5 min under DC

Page 11 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 8 (a) SEM image of cross-section of fabricated DSSC after annealing at 500  C, (b) the effect of number of layers on
thickness (T) and efciency (E) of EPD fabricated DSSCs (Reprinted from Hamadanian et al. [39], Copyright (2013), with
permission from Elsevier)

electrical eld. It has also been demonstrated that addition of both cationic deocculant and Dolapix
(a common deocculant and dispersant in ceramic industry) and adjusting the pH around 9 improved the
resulting properties.

Thick Film Optical Modulators

WO3 is used for optical modulation due to its electrochromic color [92]. Although hydrothermal process
is the most popular technique for the synthesis of tungsten oxide [93], it needs several additional steps to
complete the procedure; EPD has the signicant advantage of having control over the whole process via
manipulating pH level, process duration, and electrical power [41]. In the experiment, nanorods of WO3
were dispersed in deionized water with a pH level of around 6.77. Indium tin oxide glass (ITO-glass is a
transparent conductive solid solution of In2O3 and SnO2) was used as the working electrode with positive
charge, and the process was done at a constant current of 0.8 mA/cm2. Successful EPD of transparent ZnO
thin lms has also been reported recently [42].

Batteries and Electrochemical Capacitors

The ability of producing thick lms by EPD has made it interesting for application in lithium batteries [43]
which currently are the most favorable portable energy source in electronic devices [94]. High power and
long life cycle of electrochemical capacitors, which operate via taking advantage of the double layer
formed at the interface of electrode and electrolyte [95], have made them a promising choice for energy
storage applications [96, 97]. The supercapacitor performance was signicantly improved through EPD
of hydrous ruthenium oxide particles with polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE is a highly hydrophobic
synthetic polymer) [44]. A schematic sketch of electrophoresis of these to particles can be seen in
Fig. 9a; while Fig. 9b shows the increase in specic capacitance of electrodes coated with these materials
as a function of loading weight for hydrous ruthenium oxide electrodes.
Manganese oxide coatings for supercapacitor applications were also produced by electrophoresis
[98]. The experiment was carried out under DC electrical eld at a constant voltage of 100 V for
20 min. Manganese oxide particles were dispersed in ethanol suspension by sonication and graphite
electrodes were utilized.

Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs)

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) have played a crucial leading role in power generation. Many scientists
believe that SOFCs can revolutionize the future of science and technology due to the cells clean operation
and efciency. As it can be understood from the name, the difference between a SOFC and a conventional
Page 12 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 9 (a) EPD by adding PTFE, (b) specic capacitance versus loading weight (Reprinted from Jang et al. [44], Copyright
(2006), with permission from Elsevier)

fuel cell is that the rst one uses a solid ion conductive ceramic as the electrolyte, while the latter works
with liquid electrolytes [99]. The electronic conductivity of the dense electrolyte of a SOFC at the working
temperature of approximately 6001000  C should be low [100]. Generally, in SOFCs, the cathode is
exposed to open air or oxygen and oxygen is reduced to an oxygen anion. Then the oxygen anions travel
through the electrolyte to the anode where hydrogen molecules or hydrocarbons are oxidized at the
operating temperatures [101]. Lanthanum strontium gallium magnesium oxides (LSGMs), Lanthanum
strontium cobalt ferrites (LSCFs), yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ), and ceria gadolinium oxides (CGOs)
which have remarkable long-term stability and strong mechanical properties are the most popular
materials for electrolyte, while lanthanum strontium manganite (LSM), Ni foil, Ni/ZrO2 cermet, and
Ni/YSZ substrates are used as cathodes and anodes [102, 103]. There are several challenges in fabrication
of SOFCs such as their high operating temperatures and high layer thickness [104]. There are two possible
approaches to solve these issues. First, as the operating temperature is completely dependent on the nature
of the electrolyte material, there is always a possibility to nd better materials with higher ion conductivity
at lowered temperatures (500800  C) [105]. Second, it is known that reducing the thickness of the lm
can also lower the operating temperatures [106]. EPD has been widely exploited to fabricate SOFCs in the
last two decades [45, 46, 4951]. EPD is able to fabricate complex shapes, prepare both dense and porous
lms, and allows codeposition of different source materials. Figure 10 shows the SEM images of the
surface and the cross section of a positive electrolyte negative cell [48].
Preparation of YSZ on LSM and LSM/YSZ substrates through EPD was carried out by a constantvoltage method [107]. Another research group successfully produced well-distributed LSGM lms with

Page 13 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 10 SEM image of the sintered EPD lms of positive-electrolyte-negative (NiOYSZ/YSZ/LSCF) in a SOFC; (a) crosssection and (b) surface (Reprinted from Jia et al. [48], Copyright (2006), with permission from Elsevier)

good adhesion to platinum substrate from a suspension in a mixture of acetone and ethanol [108]. The
right selection of solvent, dispersant, and binder is of great importance in electrophoresis of ceramic
laminates to be used in SOFCs. In one experiment, they found the best properties using ternary selection
of ethyl alcohol, phosphate ester, and polyvinyl butyral as solvent, dispersant, and binder,
respectively [109].

Corrosion-Resistant Coatings

EPD is one of the most promising techniques for fabricating thick lms, which may be applied to increase
the corrosion resistance of metals. Corrosion-resistant coatings have been used for protecting different
substrates that suffer from weak corrosion resistance [110112]. Silica hybrid coatings have provided
both excellent mechanical and corrosion resistance properties, they have drawn much attention in the last
decade and EPD was commonly used to make corrosion protective coatings [52, 113115]. One study
compared corrosion behavior of silica hybrid coatings made by dipping with these made by EPD
[52]. Stainless steel and graphite electrodes were used as the substrate and counter electrode, respectively.
Temperature was maintained at 5  C during the whole procedure. EPD coatings were thicker than dipped
coatings and had more enhanced corrosion resistance.

Catalyst Support and Molecular Sieves

Porous ceramics are used as catalyst supports and molecular sieves due to their corrosion resistance and
high temperature stability. In order to broaden and modify the range of their application, coatings are
applied all over the outer and inner surface of these ceramics. Pore size and surface functionality must be
controlled too in order to improve their properties. EPD makes possible embedding strong and uniform
coatings on complex-shaped materials [116, 117], such as coating the inner surface of porous foams and
tubes. Near-200 mm layer of alumina particles was deposited onto the inner surface of porous alumina tube
via electrophoresis at a constant voltage of 100 V under DC electrical eld, using polypyrrole-coated glass
and stainless steel as the substrate and the counter electrode, respectively [53]. Figure 11 shows SEM
images of the inner wall of the noncoated and Ppy-coated tubes.

Gas sensors, with high sensitivity, capability of real-time detection, and economic efciency, are widely
used in industry [118]. EPD has greatly contributed in generating both new original and modied

Page 14 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 11 (a) Porous alumina tubes, and SEM images of the inner wall of (b) Ppy-coated and (c) noncoated tubes (Reprinted
from Kreethawate et al. [53], Copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier)

Anodic oxide



Porous layer


Sensor fabrication
Gas sensing test


Fig. 12 Schematic sketch of fabricating gas sensor via EPD (Reprinted from Han et al. [57], Copyright (2010), with
permission from Elsevier)
Page 15 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 13 Microstructure of piezoelectric functionally graded monomorph actuator; (a) plate, (b) cross-section, (c) PZT surface,
and (d) PZT1 surface (Reprinted from Chen et al. [58], Copyright (2004), with permission from Elsevier)

production routes for production of common gas sensor lms [54]. Figure 12 depicts a schematic sketch of
the process of fabricating a gas sensor with anodic aluminum oxide (AAO)/Al substrate and SEM image
of gas sensors fabricated with a current density of 90 mAcm2. It is noteworthy that an insulator support
has to be used between the gas sensing lm and the conductive substrate, in order to avoid of a short
circuiting between these two layers [55].
Al-Cr-Fe conductive substrate was electrophoretically coated by zinc oxide in construction of one of
the sensors [56]. Another sensor was constructed using aqueous electrophoretic deposition of aluminum
oxide on aluminum substrate [57].

Piezoelectric Actuators
Piezoelectric actuators (PAs) use voltage-induced size changes of ferroelectrics for highly accurate
mechanical actuators. A good PA provides high forces at low voltages. In addition, low sintering
temperature and high Curie temperature and high piezoelectric constant are very importatnt [119,
120]. PAs are utilized in a wide range of applications, from optical to aerospace industries
[121123]. PAs suffer from weak mechanical properties at both low and high temperatures and their
efciency is highly dependent on the continuity and uniformity of their structures. EPD has been proven
to successfully solve these shortcomings due to its intrinsic properties. Two versions of piezoelectric
actuators based on Pb-Zr-Ti-Bi-Fe-Ba-Cu-W oxides (PZT1 and PZT in Fig. 17) were tested in functionally graded structures with silver coated electrodes (Fig. 13) [58]. The results conrmed formation of a
piezoelectric actuator.
In another investigation, EPD was used to deposit piezoelectric layer on a graphite rod from a
suspension containing doped piezoelectric material (Fig. 14) [59]. The graphite rods were removed
from the spiral shape, resulting in complex shape PA actuators that would be very difcult to make
using traditional methods. The studies showed that EPD is a promising method in production of PAs.

Page 16 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 14 Image of piezoelectric actuators made by deposition on graphite rods (Reprinted from Chen et al. [59], Copyright
(2008), with permission from Elsevier)

Biomedical Applications
EPD has many interesting characteristics for biomedical applications, such as simplicity, cost efciency,
high production rate, low processing temperature, full controllability, ability to form complex shapes and
structures, and low processing temperature [13].
Forming Biocompatible Layers
In general, metallic biomaterials which are widely used as prosthesis and implants have one important
shortcoming which is their bioinert nature [62]. Overcoming this problem, EPD can form bioactive
ceramic coatings [124]. Amongst all, electrophoresis of hydroxyapatite (HA) and bioactive glass
(BG) has been vastly investigated by scientists [6062, 125, 126].
HA (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) is a crystalline mineral that has very similar chemical composition to bone and
teeth tissue and as it has excellent biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and bioactivity; it is widely used as
hip replacements and dental implants [6365, 127]. Processing HA via a powder route has many
difculties, for example, sintering must be done at relatively high temperatures, which may sacrice
the biocompatibility and decompose the favorable HA structure [66]. It was demonstrated that electrophoresis of thermal-sprayed HA powders in ethanol suspension at a pH of 5, using graphite and stainless
steel electrodes, leads to successful preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffold (Fig. 15a) [35]. In
comparison to salt leaching and microsphere burn out, which are the two popular routes for fabrication of
porous scaffolds, EPD has the advantages of needing no additives or binders and being a simpler process,
although the costs of preparing large components are higher. As HA has poor mechanical properties, its
applications are mostly in coating and composites with metallic substrates and matrices. Deposition of
submicron HA in the form of a thick coating by EPD has been reported (Fig. 15b) [128]. Ethanol
suspension and ultrasonic agitation was used in order to disperse the thermal-plasma-sprayed HA
particles. EPD process was carried out at pH value of 35 and under current density of
0.051.5 mA/cm2 for 90 s. Carbon rod and stainless steel cylinder were used as the substrate and the
counterelectrode, respectively. Recently, another group has studied the formation of HA nanocomposite
coatings in alcohols [129]. In their investigation, two 316 L stainless steel plates were used as electrodes
and the experiment was carried out at voltages of 20 and 60 V/cm for up to 10 min. The quality of
HA-chitosan nanocomposites were tested in alcoholic suspensions using methanol, ethanol, and
isopropanol. Results revealed that the adsorption of chitosan on HA nanoparticles showed its highest
and lowest levels, in isopropanol and methanol, respectively.

Page 17 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 15 (a) Interconnectivity of porous HA scaffold fabricated (Reprinted from Ma et al. [35], Copyright (2003), with
permission from Elsevier), (b) dense, uniform and crack-free HA tube both prepared by EPD (Reprinted from Wang
et al. [128], Copyright (2002), with permission from Elsevier)

Fig. 16 Alginate/BG composite deposited on Ti wire (Reprinted from Zhitomirsky et al. [68], Copyright (2009), with
permission from Elsevier)

BG (FDA approved composition of a mixture of SiO2, CaO, Na2O, and P2O5) is a surface reactive glass
biomaterial with a very good biocompatibility [130]. The deciencies of both BG and some metallic
implants (which are low corrosion resistance and low biocompatibility [131],) were eliminated by coating
BG on the metallic implants. Figure 16 shows deposited BG composite on Ti wire. In one study, BG was
electrophoretically deposited on 316 L stainless steel substrate in a mixture of ethanol and triethanolamine
as the suspension at constant voltages of 30, 60, and 90 V/cm2. They have also reported that the layer acts
as a barrier layer in articial saliva [69]. In another study, EPD of BG/polymer composite coatings were
made at a constant voltage range of 1030 V and a pH level of 11 [68].
Moreover, EPD has helped to develop novel bioactive composites. For example, wollastonite (CaSiO3)
particles were deposited into porous alumina and porous ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene in a
suspension of iodine and acetone at a constant voltage of 1000 V for 60 min. In the procedure,
accumulation of wollastonite particles occurred near the cathode surface [67].

Page 18 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Fig. 17 Confocal laser scanning microscope image of electrophoretically deposited bacteria after 2400 s (Reprinted from
Neirinck et al. [70], Copyright (2009), with permission from Elsevier)

EPD of Bacteria
In addition, EPD of bacterial cells was carried out and the interesting results of the investigation have
opened new windows to electrophoresis of inorganic materials [70]. In that investigation, a mixture of
demineralized water and sucrose (C12H22O11) was used as. The experiment was done under AC eld at a
constant voltage of 100 Vand a frequency of 25 Hz for 10 min. Confocal laser scanning microscope image
(Fig. 17) demonstrated that both live Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were successfully
deposited; however, the viability of the bacteria cells was compromised after the deposition.
Corrosion Protection of Implants
Magnesium alloys have an outstanding strength to weight ratio, suitable biodegradability and nontoxicity
which make them appropriate candidates for implants. The major drawback for these alloys is their low
corrosion resistance in the body. EPD has been shown to be useful in forming corrosion resistant coatings
on magnesium bio implants [71]. AZ91 Mg alloy bioimplants were coated by nanostructured akermanite
(Ca2MgSi2O7) to improve the corrosion resistance of these implants. Akermanite nano powders were
suspended and then ultrasonically dispersed in methanol and immediately deposited electrophoretically
on micro arc oxidized (MAOed) AZ91 Mg alloy substrates. EPD process was carried out at constant
voltage of 100 V for 3 min. The resulting samples were then immersed in simulated body uid (SBF) to

Page 19 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

500 m

Corrosion rate (mg/cm2/hr)

b 0.6

Akermanite coat



Immersion time (hours)



Fig. 18 (a) Cross-section view of the SEM morphology of nal sample. (b) Corrosion rate of AZ91, MAO and akermanite
coated samples immersed in SBF (Reprinted from Razavi et al. [71], Copyright (2014), with permission from Elsevier)

study the corrosion rate. Figure 18a shows SEM morphology of AZ91 after MAO and coating with
akermanite; Fig. 18b demonstrates the comparative results of the immersion test for studying the
corrosion behavior of AZ91 before and after being assisted by MAO and coating. As can be seen, the
corrosion rate has been signicantly reduced after applying MAO and akermanite coating. It is noteworthy that the porous coating has been made intentionally in order to enhance biological xations of the
living tissue to the implant.

Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) is a versatile processing technique, with remarkable characteristics such
as cost effectiveness, simple equipment, offering relatively short processing time and easy modication.
EPD was proven to be useful for production of geometrically complicated shapes, and full controllability
of the thickness and morphology, and it has gained considerable attention in the last few decades. Deep
understanding of EPD mechanisms along with appropriate process variables can lead to efcient
fabrication of the intended piece. This technique is capable of fabricating both micro- and nano-structured
ceramics, which can be used in a wide range of applications such as biomedical, optical, and corrosion
protection. It has also found applications in production of carbon nano tubes, fuel cells, sensors, and
actuators. Although EPD has been studied for more than 50 years, there are still opportunities for novel
applications and material advancements based on EPD due to its exceptional characteristics.

Page 20 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

This study is partially based upon work supported by Air Force Ofce of Scientic Research (AFOSR)
High Temperature Materials program under grant no. FA9550-10-1-0010, Oklahoma Center for
Advancement of Science and Technology (grant no. AR131-054 8161 and grant no. AR131-049) and
the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant no. 0933763.

1. Besra L, Liu M (2007) A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition
(EPD). Prog Mater Sci 52:161
2. Yoshioka T, Chvez-Valdez A, Roether J, Schubert D, Boccaccini A (2013) AC electrophoretic
deposition of organicinorganic composite coatings. J Colloid Interface Sci 392:167171
3. Gardeshzadeh A, Raissi B, Marzbanrad E (2008) Electrophoretic deposition of SnO2 nanoparticles
using low frequency AC electric elds. Mater Lett 62(1011):16971699
4. P Sarkar, D De, T Uchikochi, L Besra (2012) Electrophoretic deposition (EPD): fundamentals and
novel applications in fabrication of advanced ceramic microstructures. In: Electrophoretic deposition of nanomaterials. Springer, New York, pp 181215
5. Pickard W (1933) Remarks on the theory of electrophoretic deposition. J Electrochem Soc
6. Sarkar P, Nicholson P (1996) Electrophoretic deposition (EPD): mechanism, kinetics and application to ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 79:19872002
7. E Harsanyi (1933) Method of coating radiant bodies. US Patent 1,897,902, 14 Feb 1933
8. T Blickwedel, W Rhyne (1958) Cataphoretically coated heater insulator assembly. US Patent Patent
2,831,140, 15 Apr 1958
9. Tang F, Sakka Y, Uchikoshi T (2002) Electrophoretic deposition of aqueous nano-sized zinc oxide
suspensions on a zinc electrode. J Am Ceram Soc 85:21612165
10. Besra L, Uchikoshi T, Suzuki T, Sakka Y (2008) Bubble-free aqueous electrophoretic deposition
(EPD) by pulse potential application. J Am Ceram Soc 91:31543159
11. Besra L, Uchikoshi T, Suzuki T, Sakka Y (2009) Application of constant current pulse to suppress
bubble incorporation and control deposit morphology during aqueous electrophoretic deposition
(EPD). J Eur Ceram Soc 29:18371845
12. Biest OVD, Vandeperre L (1999) Electrophoretic deposition of materials. Annu Rev Mater Sci
13. Boccaccini A, Zhitomirsky I (2002) Application of electrophoretic and electrolytic deposition
techniques in ceramic processing. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 6:251260
14. Uchikoshi T, Suzuki T, Iimura S, Tang F, Sakka Y (2006) Control of crystalline texture in
polycrystalline TiO2 (anatase) by electrophoretic deposition in a strong magnetic eld. J Eur
Ceram Soc 26:559563
15. Rango PD, Lees M, Lejay P, Sulpice A, Tournier R, Ingold M, Germi P, Pernet M (1991) Texturing
of magnetic materials at high temperature by solidication in a magnetic eld. Nature 349:770772
16. Uchikoshi T, Suzuki T, Tang F, Okuyama H, Sakka Y (2004) Crystalline-oriented TiO2 fabricated
by the electrophoretic deposition in a strong magnetic eld. Ceram Int 30:19751978
17. Uchikoshi T, Suzuki T, Sakka Y (2006) Crystalline orientation of alumina ceramics prepared by
electrophoretic deposition under a high magnetic eld. J Mater Sci 41:80748078

Page 21 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

18. Zhang L, Vleugels J, Biest OVD (2010) Fabrication of textured alumina by orienting template
particles during electrophoretic deposition. J Eur Ceram Soc 30:11951202
19. Suzuki T, Uchikoshi T, Okuyama H, Sakka Y, Hiraga K (2006) Mechanical properties of textured,
multilayered alumina produced using electrophoretic deposition in a strong magnetic eld. J Eur
Ceram Soc 26:661665
20. Askaria E, Mehralib M, Metselaara I, Kadrib N, Rahmana M (2012) Fabrication and mechanical
properties of Al2O3/SiC/ZrO2 functionally graded material by electrophoretic deposition. J Mech
Behav Biomed Mater 12:144150
21. Ferrari B, Bartret A, Baudn C (2009) Sandwich materials formed by thick alumina tapes and thinlayered aluminaaluminium titanate structures shaped by EPD. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:10831092
22. Dzepina B, Sigalas I, Herrmann M, Nilen R (2013) The aqueous electrophoretic deposition (EPD)
of diamonddiamond laminates. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 36:126129
23. Nozariasbmarz A, Tahmasbi Rad A, Zamanipour Z, Krasinski JS, Tayebi L, Vashaee D (2013)
Enhancement of thermoelectric power factor of silicon germanium lms grown by electrophoresis
deposition. Scr Mater. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.025
24. Raissi B, Marzbanrad E, Gardeshzadeh A (2009) Particle size separation by alternating electrophoretic deposition. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:32893291
25. Boccaccini A, Cho J, Subhani T, Kaya C, Kaya F (2010) Electrophoretic deposition of carbon
nanotubeceramic nanocomposites. J Eur Ceram Soc 30:11151129
26. Wang L, Chen Y, Chen T, Que W, Sun Z (2007) Optimization of eld emission properties of carbon
nanotubes cathodes by electrophoretic deposition. Mater Lett 61:12651269
27. Ata M, Sun Y, Li X, Zhitomirsky I (2012) Electrophoretic deposition of graphene, carbon nanotubes
and composites using aluminon as charging and lm forming agent. Colloids Surf A Physicochem
Eng Asp 398:916
28. Chicatun F, Cho J, Schaab S, Brusatin G, Colombo P, Roether J (2007) Carbon nanotube deposits
and CNT/SiO2 composite coatings by electrophoretic deposition. Adv Appl Ceram 106:186195
29. Lee S, Sigmund W (2003) Formation of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes. Chem
Commun 6:780781
30. Jitianu A, Cacciaguerra T, Benoit R, Delpeux S, Bguin F, Bonnamy S (2004) Synthesis and
characterization of carbon nanotubesTiO2 nanocomposites. Carbon 42:11471151
31. Li J, Zhitomirsky I (2009) Electrophoretic deposition of manganese dioxide-carbon nanotube
composites. J Mater Process Technol 209:34523459
32. Mahajan S, Hasan S, Cho J, Shaffer M, Boccaccini A (2008) Carbon nanotubenanocrystal
heterostructures fabricated by electrophoretic deposition. Nanotechnology 19:195301 (8pp)
33. White A, Best S (2007) Hydroxyapatitecarbon nanotube composites for biomedical applications: a
review. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 4:113
34. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Gan C, Zheng C, Yu G (2006) Carbon nanotube reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings produced through laser surface alloying. Carbon 44:3745
35. Ma J, Wang C, Peng K (2003) Electrophoretic deposition of porous hydroxyapatite scaffold.
Biomaterials 24:35053510
36. Boccaccini A, Chicatun F, Cho J, Bretcanu O, Roether J, Novak S, Chen Q (2007) Carbon nanotube
coatings on bioglass-based tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater 17:28152822
37. Harrison B, Atala A (2007) Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials
38. Chiu W, Lee K, Hsieh W (2011) High efciency exible dye-sensitized solar cells by multiple
electrophoretic depositions. J Power Sources 196:36833687

Page 22 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

39. Hamadanian M, Gravand A, Jabbari V (2013) High performance dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs)
achieved via electrophoretic technique by optimizing of photoelectrode properties. Mater Sci
Semicond Process 16(5):13521359
40. Novak S, Rade K, Konig K, Boccaccini A (2008) Electrophoretic deposition in the production of
SiC/SiC composites for fusion reactor applications. J Eur Ceram Soc 28:28012807
41. Khoo E, Lee P, Ma J (2010) Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of WO3 nanorods for electrochromic
application. J Eur Ceram Soc 30:11391144
42. Verde M, Peiteado M, Caballero A, Villegas M, Ferrari B (2012) Electrophoretic deposition of
transparent ZnO thin lms from highly stabilized colloidal suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci
43. Ferrari B, Moreno R, Hernan L, Melero M, Morales J, Caballero A (2007) EPD of thick lms for
their application in lithium batteries. J Eur Ceram Soc 27:38233827
44. Jang J, Machida K, Kim Y, Naoi K (2006) Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of hydrous ruthenium
oxides with PTFE and their supercapacitor performances. Electrochim Acta 52:17331741
45. Ishihara T, Sato K, Takita Y (1996) Electrophoretic deposition of Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 electrolyte
lms in solid oxide fuel cells. J Am Ceram Soc 79(4):913919
46. Ishihara T, Sato K, Mizuhara Y, Takita Y (1992) Preparation of yttria-stabilized zirconia lms for
solid oxide fuel cells by electrophoretic deposition method. Chem Lett 21:943946
47. Ishihara T, Shimise K, Kudo T, Nishiguchi H, Akbay T, Takita Y (2000) Preparation of Yttriastabilised zirconia thin-lms on strontium doped LaMnO3 cathode substrate via
Electrophoretic. J Am Ceram Soc 83:19211927
48. Jia L, L
u Z, Huang X, Liu Z, Chen K, Sha X, Li G, Su W (2006) Preparation of YSZ lm by EPD
and its application in SOFCs. J Alloys Compd 424:299303
49. Konno H, Tokita M, Furusaki A, Furuichi R (1992) Electrochemical formation of a-site substituted
perovskite structure La1  xMxCrO3 oxide coatings. Electrochim Acta 37(13):24212426
50. Zhitomirsky I, Petric A (1999) Electrolytic and electrophoretic deposition of CeO2 lms. Mater Lett
51. Zhitomirsky I, Petric A (2000) Electrolytic deposition of Gd2O3 and organoceramic composite.
Mater Lett 42:273279
52. Castro Y, Ferrari B, Moreno R, Durn A (2005) Corrosion behaviour of silica hybrid coatings
produced from basic catalysed particulate sols by dipping and EPD. Surf Coat Technol
53. Kreethawate L, Larpkiattaworn S, Jiemsirilers S, Besra L, Uchikoshi T (2010) Application of
electrophoretic deposition for inner surface coating of porous ceramic tubes. Surf Coat Technol
54. Dougami N, Takada T (2003) Modication of metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor by electrophoretic deposition. Sens Actuators B 93:316320
55. Korotcenkov G (2005) Gas response control through structural and chemical modication of metal
oxide lms: state of the art and approaches. Sens Actuators B 107:209232
56. Hossein-Babaei F, Taghibakhsh F (2001) Electrophoretically deposited zinc oxide thick-lm gas
sensors. Electron Lett 36:18151816
57. Han N, Deng P, Chen J, Chai L, Gao H, Chen Y (2010) Electrophoretic deposition of metal oxide
lms aimed for gas sensors application: the role of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO)/Al composite
structure. Sens Actuators B 144:267273
58. Chen Y, Ma J, Li T (2004) Electrophoretic deposition and characterization of a piezoelectric FGM
monomorph actuator. Ceram Int 30:18071809

Page 23 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

59. Chen Y, Boey T, Li F, Ma J (2008) Electrophoretic deposition and characterization of helical

piezoelectric actuator. Ceram Int 34:16
60. Zhitomirsky I, Gal-Or L (1997) Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater
Med 8:213219
61. Roether J, Boccaccini A, Hench L, Maquet V, Gautier S, Jerome R (2002) Development and in vitro
characterization of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composite materials based on polylactide
foams and Bioglass for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:38713878
62. Stojanovic D, Jokic B, Veljovic D, Petrovic R, Uskokovic P, Janackovic D (2007) Bioactive
glassapatite composite coating for titanium implant synthesized by electrophoretic deposition.
J Eur Ceram Soc 27:15951599
63. Javidi M, Javadpour S, Bahrololoom M (2008) Electrophoretic deposition of natural hydroxyapatite
on medical grade 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng C 28:15091515
64. Pang X, Zhitomirsky I (2005) Electrodeposition of composite hydroxyapatitechitosan lms. Mater
Chem Phys 94:245251
65. Ducheyne P, Radin S, Heughebaert M, Heughebaert J (1990) Calcium phosphate ceramic coatings
on porous titanium: effects of structure and composition on electrophoretic deposition. Biomaterials
66. Wei M, Ruys A, Milthorpe B, Sorrel C (1999) Solution ripening of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles:
effects on electrophoretic deposition. J Biomed Mater Res 45:1119
67. Yamaguchi S, Yabutsuka T, Hibino M, Yao T (2009) Development of novel bioactive composites by
electrophoretic deposition. Mater Sci Eng C 29:15841588
68. Zhitomirsky D, Roether J, Boccaccini A, Zhitomirsky I (2009) Electrophoretic deposition of
bioactive glass/polymer composite coatings with and without HA nanoparticle inclusions for
biomedical applications. J Mater Process Technol 209:18531860
69. Mehdipour M, Afshar A, Mohebali M (2012) Electrophoretic deposition of bioactive glass coating
on 316L stainless steel and electrochemical behavior study. Appl Surf Sci 258:98329839
70. Neirinck B, Mellaert LV, Fransaer J, Biest OVD, Ann J, Vleugels J (2009) Electrophoretic
deposition of bacterial cells. Electrochem Commun 11:18421845
71. Razavi M, Fathi M, Savabi O, Razavi S, Hashemi Beni B, Vashaee D, Tayebi L (2014) Controlling
the degradation rate of bioactive magnesium implants by electrophoretic deposition of akermanite
coating. Ceram Int 40(3):38653872. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.027
72. Tassel JV, Randall C (2006) Mechanisms of electrophoretic deposition. Key Eng Mater
73. Tassel JV, Randall C (1999) Electrophoretic deposition and sintering of thin/thick PZT lms. J Eur
Ceram Soc 19:955958
74. Tassel JV, Randall C (2004) Potential for integration of electrophoretic deposition into electronic
device manufacture; demonstrations using silver/palladium. J Mater Sci 39:867880
75. Hamaker H (1940) Formation of deposition by electrophoresis. Trans Faraday Soc 36:279287
76. Hamaker H, Verwey E (1940) Colloid stability: the role of the forces between the particles in the
electrodeposition and other phenomena. Trans Faraday Soc 36:180185
77. Sarkar P, Huang X, Nicholson P (1993) Electrophoretic deposition and its use to synthesize
YSZ/A1203 micro laminate ceramic/ceramic composites. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 14:707726
78. Koelmans H, Overbeek J (1954) Stability and electrophoretic deposition of suspensions in
non-aqueous media. Discuss Faraday Soc 18:5263
79. Ferrari B, Moreno R (1996) The conductivity of aqueous Al2O3 slips for electrophoretic deposition.
Mater Lett 28:353355

Page 24 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

80. Negishi H, Yanagishita H, Yokokawa H (2002) Electrophoretic deposition of solid oxide fuel cell
material powders. In: Proceedings of the electrochemical society on electrophoretic deposition:
fundamentals and applications, vol 21, New Jersey, pp 214221
81. Vandeperre L, Biest OVD, Clegg W (1997) Silicon carbide laminates with carbon interlayers by
electrophoretic deposition. Key Eng Mater 1:127131
82. Basu R, Randall C, Mayo M (2001) Fabrication of dense zirconia electrolyte lms for tubular solid
oxide fuel cells by electrophoretic deposition. J Am Ceram Soc 84:3340
83. Gani MSJ (1994) Electrophoretic deposition: a review. Ind Ceram 14:163174
84. Sarraf H, karpov L, Louda P (2007) Inuence of different anionic polyelectrolyte dispersants on
the rheological and electrokinetic properties of carbon nanotubes. Ann Trans Nordic Rheol Soc
85. Suresh S, Mortensen A (1997) Functionally graded metals and metalceramic composites: part
2 thermomechanical behaviour. Int Mater Rev 42:85116
86. Bueno S, Baudn C (2007) Layered materials with high strength and aw tolerance based on
alumina and aluminium titanate. J Eur Ceram Soc 27(23):14551462
87. Vashaee D, Christofferson J, Zhang Y, Shakouri A, Zeng G, LaBounty C, Fan X, Bowers JE, Croke
E (2005) Modeling and optimization of single-element bulk SiGe thin-lm coolers. Microscale
Thermophys Eng 9:99118
88. Li Q, Wang X, Yuan D (2009) Preparation of solid-phase microextraction ber coated with singlewalled carbon nanotubes by electrophoretic deposition and its application in extracting phenols
from aqueous samples. J Chromatogr A 1216:13051311
89. Chen C, Wang M, Li J, Pootrakulchote N, Alibabaei L, Ngoc-le C, Decoppet J, Tsai J, Gratzel C,
Wu C, Zakeeruddin S, Gratzel M (2009) Highly efcient light-harvesting ruthenium sensitizer for
thin-lm dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 3:31033109
90. Muroga T, Gasparotto M, Zinkle S (2002) Overview of materials research for fusion reactors.
Fusion Eng Des 6162:1325
91. Tavassoli A (2002) Present limits and improvements of structural materials for fusion reactors a
review. J Nucl Mater 302:7388
92. Niklasson G, Granqvist C (2007) Electrochromics for smart windows: thin lms of tungsten oxide
and nickel oxide, and devices based on these. J Mater Chem 17:127156
93. Subrahmanyam A, Karuppasamy A (2007) Optical and electrochromic properties of oxygen
sputtered tungsten oxide (WO3) thin lms. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 91:266274
94. Souquet J, Duclot M (2002) Thin lm lithium batteries. Solid State Ion 148:375379
95. Miller J, Burke A (2008) Electrochemical capacitors: challenges and opportunities for real-world
applications. Electrochem Soc Interface 17:5357
96. Sharma P, Bhatti T (2010) A review on electrochemical double-layer capacitors. Energy Convers
Manag 51:29012912
97. Deng L, Hao Z, Wang J, Zhu G, Kang L, Liu Z, Yang Z, Wang Z (2013) Preparation and capacitance
of graphene/multiwall carbon nanotubes/MnO2 hybrid material for high-performance asymmetrical
electrochemical capacitor. Electrochim Acta 89:191198
98. Chen C, Wang S, Lin C, Chen F, Lin C (2009) Electrophoretically deposited manganese oxide
coatings for supercapacitor application. Ceram Int 35:34693474
99. Minh N (1993) Ceramic fuel cells. J Am Ceram Soc 76(3):563588
100. Huijsmans J (2001) Ceramics in solid oxide fuel cells. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 5:317323
101. Minh N (2004) Solid oxide fuel cell technology features and applications. Solid State Ion

Page 25 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

102. Sun C, Stimming U (2007) Recent anode advances in solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources
103. Badwal S, Foger K (1996) Solid oxide electrolyte fuel cell review. Ceram Int 22(3):257265
104. Yokokawa H, Tu H, Iwanschitz B, Mai A (2008) Fundamental mechanisms limiting solid oxide fuel
cell durability. J Power Sources 182:400412
105. Zhu B (2003) Functional ceriasalt-composite materials for advanced ITSOFC applications.
J Power Sources 114(1):19
106. Talebi T, Raissi B, Haji M, Maghsoudipour A (2010) The role of electrical conductivity of substrate
on the YSZ lm formed by EPD for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Int J Hydrog Energy
107. Chen F, Liu M (2001) Preparation of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) lms on La0.85Sr0.15MnO3
(LSM) and LSMYSZ substrates using an electrophoretic deposition (EPD) process. J Eur Ceram
Soc 21:127134
108. Sora I, Pelosato R, Simone A, Montanaro L, Maglia F, Chiodelli G (2006) Characterization of
LSGM lms obtained by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Solid State Ion 177:19851989
109. Zhitomirsky I, Petric A (2000) Electrophoretic deposition of ceramic materials for fuel cell
applications. J Eur Ceram Soc 20:20552061
110. Priyantha N, Jayaweera P, Sanjurjo A, Lau K, Lu F, Krist K (2003) Corrosion-resistant metallic
coatings for applications in highly aggressive environments. Surf Coat Technol 163164:3136
111. El-Sharif M, Su Y, Chisholm C, Watson A (1993) Corrosion resistance of electrodeposited zincchromium alloy coatings. Corros Sci 35:12591265
112. ODonnell P (1967) Beryllium uoride coating as a corrosion retardant for beryllium. Corros Sci
113. Pepe A, Aparicio M, Cer S, Durn A (2005) Synthesis of hybrid silica solgel coatings containing
Zn particles on carbon steel and Al/Zn coated carbon steel. Mater Lett 59:39373940
114. Pepe A, Galliano P, Cer S, Aparicio M, Durn A (2005) Hybrid silica solgel coatings on
Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI). Mater Lett 59:22192222
115. Lu H, Hu Y, Gu M, Tang S, Lu H, Meng X (2009) Synthesis and characterization of silicaacrylicepoxy hybrid coatings on 430 stainless steel. Surf Coat Technol 204:9198
116. Kanamura K, Hamagami J (2004) Innovation of novel functional material processing technique by
using electrophoretic deposition process. Solid State Ion 172:303308
117. Boccaccini A, Schindler U, Kr
uger H (2001) Ceramic coatings on carbon and metallic bres by
electrophoretic deposition. Mater Lett 51(3):225230
118. Franchini RDA, Souza CD, Colombara R, Matos MC, Matos R (2007) Rapid determination of
hydrogen peroxide using peroxidase immobilized on Amberlite IRA-743 and minerals in honey.
J Agric Food Chem 55:68856890
119. King T, Preston M, Murphy B, Cannell D (1990) Piezoelectric ceramic actuators: a review of
machinery applications. Precis Eng 12(3):131136
120. Crawley E, Luis JD (1987) Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures. Am
Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 25:13731385
121. Chao X, Yang Z, Li G, Cheng Y (2008) Fabrication and characterization of low temperature
sintering PMNPZNPZT step-down multilayer piezoelectric transformer. Sens Actuat
A 144:117123
122. Trolier-McKinstry S, Muralt P (2004) Thin lm piezoelectrics for MEMS. J Electroceram 12:717
123. Dong W, Sun L, Du Z (2007) Design of a precision compliant parallel positioner driven by dual
piezoelectric actuators. Sens Actuat A 135:250256

Page 26 of 27

Handbook of Nanoelectrochemistry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15207-3_7-1
# Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

124. Boccaccini A, Keim S, Ma R, Li Y, Zhitomirsky I (2010) Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials.

J R Soc Interface 7:S581S613
125. Hench L (2006) The story of bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:967978
126. Kim H (2003) Ceramic bioactivity and related biomimetic strategy. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci
127. Wang P, Li C, Gong H, Jiang X, Wang H, Li K (2010) Effects of synthesis conditions on the
morphology of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles produced by wet chemical process. Powder Technol
128. Wang C, Ma J, Cheng W, Zhang R (2002) Thick hydroxyapatite coatings by electrophoretic
deposition. Mater Lett 57:99105
129. Mahmoodi S, Sorkhi L, Farrokhi-Rad M, Shahrabi T (2013) Electrophoretic deposition of
hydroxyapatitechitosan nanocomposite coatings in different alcohols. Surf Coat Technol
130. Jones J (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9:44574486
131. Hench L (1998) Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 81:17051728

Page 27 of 27