Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Fig. 1.
Top-loaded antennas.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Fig. 2.
2
H
Also
Rrad = 10 (H)2
(1)
(2)
Where
Rrad is the antenna radiation resistance [].
H is the antenna height [m].
is the wavelength [m].
= 2 / is the space phase constant or wave number
[rad/m].
These expressions can be obtained from any antenna book
[4], [5], [6], [7].
This radiation resistance is quite small when the ratio H/
is less than 0.1. This is due to the small area of the current
distribution along the antenna, calculated from the base to the
top. In this case, the current distribution area is the area of a
triangle H in height and the antenna input current I 0 as the
triangle base. The top current I t is, of course, a null.
In order to increase the current distribution area, a top-load
is used. In this specific case, the top current I t is not a null
and it depends on the top-loading conditions.
For the antenna vertical wire, there are several expressions that can be used to calculate the average characteristic
impedance, and all of them give results very close to those
obtained here [2], [3].
The input impedance at the top of the antenna, looking along
the top-load, is equivalent to the input impedance of n open
end low loss transmission lines in parallel. Therefore,
Where
Zt is the antenna top impedance [].
Xt is the antenna top reactance [].
Z0t is the top-load characteristic impedance [].
L is the top-load length [m].
n is the number of top-load branches.
= 2 / is the space phase constant or wave number
[rad/m].
Zt = j Xt = j
Z0t
n tan L
(5)
1
[F]
2 f | Xt |
(6)
(7)
Where
Za is the antenna input impedance [].
Ra is the real part of the antenna input impedance [].
Xa is the antenna input reactance [].
The real part of the antenna input impedance, R a , depends
on the antenna radiation resistance R rad and the equivalent
loss resistance Rloss . The loss resistance Rloss depends on
the conductor resistance R c , the insulator equivalent loss
resistance Ri and the ground plane equivalent loss resistance
Rgp .
Therefore,
Ra = Rrad + Rloss
(8)
Rloss = Rc + Ri + Rgp
(9)
Where
0zH
(13)
(14)
Z0m tan H + Xt
Z0m Xt tan H
(16)
(10)
Where
Xa is the antenna input reactance [].
Z0m is the antenna average characteristic impedance [].
Xt is the antenna top reactance [].
H is the antenna height [m].
The top-loaded antenna is resonant if X a = 0. Under this
condition, the top reactance X t becomes
(15)
I() =
It
n
0zH
(17)
It = I0 cos H
(18)
It
= cos H
I0
(19)
cos
sin
tan Lres
0 Lres
(20)
(11)
arctan
2
Z0t
n Z0m tan H
(12)
0zH
(21)
(22)
0 L (23)
400
(z z )2 + 2 is the distance from the
Where R =
antenna current element I(z ) dz to the observation point
(, , z).
In Appendix B the magnetic vector potential has been
obtained, so the magnetic field H can be calculated using the
following classical expression:
90
|Z |
[deg]
|Z |
[]
Z00 = 377
300
67.5
200
45
100
22.5
H=
0
0
Fig. 5.
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
1
(24)
Vt = j I0 Z0m sin H
1 Az
(31)
0
Thus, for a resonant top-loaded antenna, the magnetic field
intensity on the ground plane, at z = 0, becomes
I0 ejr1 H
cos H + j sin H
(32)
H =
2
r1
Where r1 = H2 + 2 is the distance from the antenna top
to a point on the ground surface, and is the distance from
the antenna base to the same point.
This is the magnetic field corresponding to a perfectly conducting ground plane. The actual magnetic field is practically
of the same value close to the antenna base, as measurements
indicate [17], because it is not appreciably affected by the
finite soil conductivity [10], [11].
The electric field intensity E is obtained by means of the
Maxwell equation
H =
(25)
(26)
Z0t
sin
V() = j I0 cos H Z0m tan H cos +
n
(27)
rot H = j 0 E
0 Lres
VL = j I0
Z0t cos H
n sin Lres
(30)
In cylindrical coordinates,
Z0t
sin L
VL = j It Xt cos L
n
1
rot A
0
(28)
(33)
Thus, for a resonant top-loaded antenna, the electric field intensity on the earth surface, at z = 0, has only one component
Ez for a perfectly conducting ground plane. Therefore,
H cos H j H cos H sin H
+
r31
r21
r1
(34)
The near magnetic and electric fields on the earth surface,
H and Ez , are clearly more complex functions of the radial
distance than in the case of the Hertz monopole, where H
is infinitesimal.
When the ground plane is not perfectly conducting, the
electric field develops a small radial component E . This
electric field component E is related to the magnetic field
H as follows
Zg H for 0 < < R0
(35)
E =
Zs H for > R0
j I0 ejr1
Ez =
2 0
Where
Zg is the parallel impedance of the soil and ground screen
[].
Zs is the soil impedance [].
R0 is the metallic ground screen radius [m].
The E and H field components produce a wave that
propagates into the soil under the antenna and is dissipated
as heat.
Fig. 6. Sketch of one instant near electric field and ground plane conduction
currents.
B. Wave Impedance
The ratio between the near electric and magnetic fields, E z
and H , is the wave impedance Z 0 just above the earth surface
in the air.
The wave impedance is a complex magnitude, almost purely
imaginary very close to the antenna and almost a real magnitude at the distance of half-wavelength from the antenna base.
This can be seen as an example in Fig. 5.
This is a good representation of the antenna behavior, and it
means that the half-wavelength radius space surrounding the
antenna is part of the wave generator (oscillator). The antenna
is not only the conductive wires, but a hemispherical free space
wave generator half-wavelength in radius.
Through this hemispherical surface, a wave is radiated into
the surrounding free space. The earth area under this hemisferical space is a circle, which is very important, because all the
conductive currents flowing on it are part of the antenna circuit
and, for this reason, it must have the maximum conductivity in
order to achieve the maximum antenna efficiency. This circle
is half-wavelength in radius, as can be seen in Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
(36)
I0 ej
sin H
0 2
(37)
H = j
Ez = j
I0 ej
sin H
2
or
C. Far Field
For broadcast use, in low and medium frequencies, field
intensity on the surface of the earth is of interest and, as a
first approximation, a planar earth can be considered.
Ez = Z00 H
(38)
(39)
H = 1 H
(40)
E = 1z Z00 H
(41)
Rc
0.7
[]
0.6
Where
Rrad is the antenna radiation resistance [].
H is the antenna height [m].
is the wavelength [m].
= 2 / is the space phase constant or wave number
[rad/m].
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2
4
8
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
0.35
[]
0.3
A = I0 H = H
The radiation resistance of any current distribution is proportional to the square of the area [3], that is
Rrad = K A2
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
(46)
(47)
2
4
8
Rrad = 40 A2
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
P = (1z 1 )
1
Z00 | H |2
2
(42)
or
1
Z00 | H |2 = 1 P
(43)
2
It can be seen that the power density P is pointing outward,
i.e. the antenna generated wave is an outgoing wave.
In the far field, the ratio between the electric and magnetic
field intensities is the free space impedance, Z 00 = 377 .
This ratio is clearly obtained at a distance greater than halfwavelength from the antenna base.
In Appendix C the far field expressions in the upper
hemisphere and in spherical coordinates are obtained.
P = 1
H
2
2
= 10 (H)2
(49)
Rrad
H
= 40
2
2
It
1+
I0
(51)
Rrad
2
It
= 10 (H)
1+
I0
(52)
or
2
Also
Also
Rrad = 40 (H)2
(48)
(45)
Rrad = 40 2
2
2
H
It
1+
I0
(53)
10
[] 100
10
soil
[]
10
soil
4
8
10
10
30
10
30
10
60
60
3
10
10
120
10
180
180
10
10
10
120
10
10
10
10
10
10
[m]
Fig. 10.
Artificial ground plane resistance as a function of distance ,
for different numbers of radials N and over average soil, at 200 kHz.
( = 102 S/m, r = 10).
10
[m]
10
Fig. 12.
Artificial ground plane resistance as a function of distance
, for different numbers of radials N and over average soil, at 1 MHz.
( = 102 S/m, r = 10).
10
10
Xg
soil
4
[]
soil
[]
4
8
10
10
30
30
0
60
10
60
1
10
120
120
1
180
10
180
2
10
N
2
10
10
10
10
Fig. 11.
Artificial ground plane reactance as a function of distance ,
for different numbers of radials N and over average soil, at 200 kHz.
( = 102 S/m, r = 10).
Rrad
2
H
= 40
(1 + cos H)2
10
[m]
10
10
Fig. 13.
Artificial ground plane reactance as a function of distance ,
for different numbers of radials N and over average soil, at 1 MHz.
( = 102 S/m, r = 10).
1
Rl =
a
(54)
[m]
f 0
4 c
(55)
4.16
f 108 [/m]
a
(56)
Wc =
1
2
I2 (z) Rl dz +
0
n
2
Lres
I2 () Rl d
(57)
2 Wc
I20
(58)
Zr () = j Xr = j 2 f 0 sin
Rc =
Rl
I20
I2 (z) dz + n
0
Lres
I2 () d
ln
(61)
sin
a0
N
0 R0
(59)
Where
Zr () is the screen impedance at the distance from the
antenna base [].
f is the operation frequency [Hz].
is the distance from the star center [m].
N is the number of radials.
a0 is the radius of the radial conductors [m].
R0 is the radius of the star or ground screen [m].
Placing both impedances Z s and Zr in parallel, the artificial
ground plane impedance Z g will be
Zs Zr
Zs + Zr
Zg = Rg + j Xg =
(62)
gp
[]
0
N
4
8
30
60
1
0.8
120
0.6
0.4
0
180
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Fig. 15.
Ground plane equivalent loss resistance
Inverted-L antenna over average ground as a function
ground plane radius R0 at 200 kHz, and for different
(n = 1, nc = 1, H = 105 m, Lres = 276.2 m, a
= 102 S/m, r = 10).
R0 [m]
for a resonant
of the artificial
radial numbers.
= 6 103 m,
10
gp
[]
2.8
10
Rgp
4
8
0.1
2.6
[]
30
2.4
0.09
2.2
0.08
0.07
60
1
1.8
120
0.06
1.6
180
0
50
100
1.4
R [m]
1.2
0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19
150
Fig. 16.
Ground plane equivalent loss resistance
Inverted-L antenna over average ground as a function
ground plane radius R0 at 1 MHz, and for different
(n = 1, nc = 1, H = 21 m, Lres = 55.46 m, a
= 102 S/m, r = 10).
for a resonant
of the artificial
radial numbers.
= 6 103 m,
| Jsu |2 Rg dg +
g
1
2
0.2
f [MHz]
Wd =
0.05
H/
Fig. 17. Ground plane equivalent loss resistance for a resonant Inverted-L
antenna as a function of frequency, for different antenna heights and over
an average ground, for LF band.
(n = 1, nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 0.05, N = 30, = 102 S/m, r = 10).
Where
Wd is the power dissipated in the ground plane [W].
Jsu is the surface current density [A/m].
g is the surface of the artificial ground plane for
0 R0 .
Rg is the real part of the artificial ground plane impedance
Zg [].
s is the surface of the natural ground plane for
R0 /2.
Rs is the real part of the natural ground plane impedance
Zs [].
The surface current density J su is equal to the near magnetic
field H (32) on the artificial and natural ground planes.
/2
| H | Rg d +
2
| H | Rs d
2
R0
(64)
The first integral is the power dissipated in the artificial
ground plane surface g and the second one is the power
dissipated in the natural ground plane surface s .
C. Ground Plane Equivalent Loss Resistance
The ground plane equivalent loss resistance R gp is necessary
to be known, because it is an important factor in the antenna
electric circuit, and it permits the calculation of the total
equivalent loss resistance Rloss in (9).
The ground plane equivalent loss resistance R gp is given by
the ratio between the power dissipated in the ground plane and
the square of the antenna effective input current. Therefore,
Rgp =
2 Wd
I20
(65)
| Jsu |2 Rs ds (63)
s
R0
Rgp
2
= 2
I0
R0
| H | Rg d +
2
/2
| H | Rs d
2
R0
(66)
The first integral cannot be evaluated in closed form, and it
will be resolved numerically. The second one can be evaluated
analytically and is given in Appendix G.
The ground plane equivalent loss resistance R gp depends
on the antenna height H, the number of radials N, the radius
R0 of the artificial ground plane and the physical constants of
the soil under the antenna.
In Figs. 15 and 16 the ground plane equivalent loss resistance Rgp has been calculated for a resonant Inverted-L
antenna. As an example, this resistance can be seen as a
function of the artificial ground plane radius R 0 , for different
radial numbers N, at the frequencies of 200 kHz and 1 MHz
11
Rgp
1.6
[]
1.4
0.1
1.2
0.09
0.08
12
0.8
0.07
10
0.6
0.06
20
[]
18
16
14
8
6
0.05
0.4
H/
0.2
N
4
8
30
120
0.6
0.8
1.2
2
1.4
1.6
f [MHz]
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 18. Ground plane equivalent loss resistance for a resonant Inverted-L
antenna as a function of frequency, for different antenna heights and over
an average ground, for MF band.
(n = 1, nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 0.25, N = 120, = 102 S/m, r = 10).
100
Rgp
25
/ r
[]
10
10
/4
[]
102 / 10
15
3102 / 20
1
N
0
4
8
20
30
120
10
5 / 80
0.1
0.1
10
f [MHz]
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 19. Ground plane equivalent loss resistance for a resonant Inverted-L
antenna as a function of frequency and for different soil physical conditions.
(n = 1, nc = 1, H = 0.07, a = 6 103 m, R0 = 0.01, N = 180).
Wrad
Win
(67)
12
TABLE I
I NVERTED -L ANTENNA EFFICIENCY AND GAIN .
f = 200 kHz, H = 105 m, R0 = 75 m, N = 30.
r
S/m
dBi
103
0.585
2.44
102
10
0.743
3.48
3 102
20
0.789
3.74
80
0.897
4.30
TABLE II
T ANTENNA EFFICIENCY AND GAIN .
f = 200 kHz, H = 105 m, R0 = 75 m, N = 30.
G
[dBi]
r
S/m
dBi
103
0.594
2.51
102
10
0.758
3.57
3 102
20
0.806
3.84
80
0.919
4.41
4.77
1
2
3
4
2
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 23. Resonant X antenna gain as a function of the antenna height and
for several soil conditions at 200 kHz. (n = 4, nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 75 m, N = 30, a0 = 1.5 103 m).
Rrad
(68)
Ra
Where Ra = Rrad + Rc + Rgp is the antenna input
resistance, and the insulator equivalent loss resistance R i has
been neglected.
The monopole antenna directivity D depends on the antenna
far field radiation pattern and, in spherical coordinates, it is
defined as
=
D = 2
0
4 Pmax
/2
d 0 P(, ) sin d
(69)
(70)
TABLE III
X ANTENNA EFFICIENCY AND GAIN .
f = 200 kHz, H = 105 m, R0 = 75 m, N = 30.
r
S/m
dBi
103
0.598
2.54
102
10
0.764
3.60
3 102
20
0.813
3.87
80
0.928
4.45
13
TABLE IV
I NVERTED -L ANTENNA EFFICIENCY AND GAIN .
f = 1.00 MHz, H = 21 m, R0 = 75 m, N = 120.
r
G
[dBi]
4.77
120/180
60
30
S/m
dBi
103
0.777
3.67
102
10
0.877
4.20
3 102
20
0.896
4.29
80
0.940
4.50
4
5
TABLE V
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
r
S/m
dBi
103
0.784
3.71
102
10
0.886
4.25
3 102
20
0.906
4.34
80
0.951
4.55
Fig. 24. Resonant X antenna gain as a function of the antenna height, for
different numbers of radials N and over average ground at 200 kHz. (n = 4,
nc = 1, a = 6 103 m, R0 = 75 m, a0 = 1.5 103 m, = 102 S/m,
r = 10).
G
[dBi]
4.5
4.77
2
3
4
3.5
r
S/m
dBi
103
0.787
3.73
102
10
0.890
4.26
3 102
20
0.909
4.36
80
0.955
4.57
2.5
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 25. Resonant X antenna gain as a function of the antenna height and
for several soil conditions at 1 MHz. (n = 4, nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 75 m, N = 120, a0 = 1.5 103 m).
14
TABLE X
4.77
G
[dBi]
120/180
60
30
R0 /
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
-1.92
-1.87
-1.85
-1.85
-1.85
-1.85
0.05
-0.10
0.50
1.01
1.05
1.06
1.07
0.10
0.19
1.08
2.21
2.37
2.42
2.42
0.15
0.26
1.23
2.69
2.97
3.06
3.08
0.20
0.29
1.29
2.93
3.32
3.45
3.48
0.25
0.30
1.32
3.08
3.55
3.73
3.77
0.50
0.32
1.37
3.37
4.07
4.47
4.58
2
3
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
TABLE XI
Fig. 26. Resonant X antenna gain as a function of the antenna height, for
different numbers of radials N and over average ground at 1 MHz. (n = 4,
nc = 1, a = 6 103 m, R0 = 75 m, a0 = 1.5 103 m, = 102 S/m,
r = 10).
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
1.36
1.50
1.57
1.58
1.58
1.58
TABLE VII
0.05
1.93
2.41
3.09
3.21
3.25
3.26
0.10
1.98
2.52
3.47
3.73
3.84
3.86
0.15
1.99
2.55
3.57
3.91
4.07
4.11
0.20
1.99
2.55
3.62
3.99
4.19
4.25
0.25
2.00
2.56
3.64
4.04
4.26
4.33
0.50
2.00
2.57
3.68
4.12
4.42
4.53
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
0.49
0.63
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.05
1.21
1.77
2.54
2.67
2.71
2.72
0.10
1.29
1.92
3.03
3.34
3.46
3.49
0.15
1.30
1.96
3.18
3.57
3.76
3.81
0.20
1.31
1.97
3.24
3.69
3.92
3.99
0.25
1.31
1.98
3.28
3.75
4.03
4.11
0.50
1.32
1.99
3.33
3.88
4.24
4.38
TABLE VIII
X ANTENNA GAIN G [dBi].
f = 200 kHz, H = 105 m, = 102 S/m, r = 10.
R0 /
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
2.59
2.77
2.95
2.97
2.97
2.97
0.05
2.73
3.04
3.60
3.78
3.87
3.89
0.10
2.74
3.06
3.69
3.95
4.11
4.16
0.15
2.74
3.06
3.72
3.99
4.18
4.25
0.20
2.75
3.07
3.72
4.01
4.22
4.29
0.25
2.75
3.07
3.73
4.02
4.23
4.32
0.50
2.75
3.07
3.73
4.03
4.26
4.36
TABLE IX
X ANTENNA GAIN G [dBi].
TABLE XII
X ANTENNA GAIN G [dBi].
R0 /
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
3.20
3.35
3.54
3.57
3.58
3.58
0.05
3.26
3.46
3.87
4.03
4.12
4.15
0.10
3.26
3.47
3.91
4.10
4.24
4.29
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.50
3.26
3.26
3.26
3.26
3.47
3.48
3.48
3.48
3.91
3.92
3.92
3.92
4.12
4.12
4.13
4.13
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.33
4.35
4.36
4.38
R0 /
N=4
N=8
N = 30
N = 60
N = 120
N = 180
0.01
2.36
2.52
2.64
2.65
2.65
2.65
0.05
2.62
2.99
3.59
3.74
3.79
3.80
0.10
2.64
3.03
3.76
4.02
4.15
4.18
0.15
2.65
3.04
3.81
4.10
4.27
4.32
0.20
2.65
3.04
3.82
4.13
4.32
4.39
0.25
2.65
3.05
3.83
4.15
4.36
4.43
0.50
2.65
3.05
3.85
4.18
4.42
4.52
15
f
[kHz]
2.5
4.5
VSWR
f
[kHz]
10 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
3.5
/ r
3
10 / 4
102 / 10
2
310 / 20
VSWR
1.5
2.5
1.5
1.5
1
1.5
1.25
0.5
1.25
1
0.5
0
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
f 4
[kHz]3.5
/ r
10 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
3
2.5
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
f 14
[kHz] 12
VSWR
0
0.04
10
VSWR
103 / 4
102 / 10
2
310 / 20
1.5
1.5
1
1.5
1.25
0.5
1.25
2
0
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
0
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
Fig. 30.
Resonant Inverted-L antenna bandwidth as a function of the
antenna height and for different soil conditions at 1 MHz. (n = 1, nc = 1,
3
a = 6 10
m, R0 = 0.25, N = 120, a0 = 1.5 103 m).
16
f 20
[kHz] 18
18
f
[kHz] 16
VSWR
14
12
10 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
/ r
16
14
10
10
1.5
1.25
1.25
0
0.04
2
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
8
7
12
1.5
f 10
[kHz] 9
VSWR
10 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
/ r
3
10 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
f 40
[kHz] 35
VSWR
0.05
VSWR
103 / 4
102 / 10
3102 / 20
30
25
6
20
1.5
1.5
15
4
10
1.25
2
1
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
1.25
H/
0.1
0
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
H/
0.1
17
18
1.6
[kV]
16
Htot/
14
1.2
12
10
8
6
4
2
4
8
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 35. Top-load tip effective voltage for resonant top-loaded antennas as
a function of the antenna height at 200 kHz. (nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 0.05, N = 30, a0 = 1.5 103 m, = 102 S/m, r = 10).
VL
20
[kV]
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
4
2
Antenna Type
1
2
4
8
"Inverted L"
"T"
"X"
"8Star"
1.4
8
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 36. Top-load tip effective voltage for resonant top-loaded antennas as
a function of the antenna height at 1 MHz. (nc = 1, a = 6 103 m,
R0 = 0.25, N = 120, a0 = 1.5 103 m, = 102 S/m, r = 10).
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
8
4
2
n
0.02
1
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
H/
Fig. 37. Resonant top-loaded antenna total length (Htot = H + n Lres ) as
a function of the antenna height, for different top-load branches n at 1 MHz.
18
TABLE XIII
A NTENNA GAIN AND E- FIELD S TRENGTH
dBi
mV/m
dBV/m
5.0
3.16
307.9
109.76
4.8
3.02
301.0
109.57
4.6
2.88
294.0
109.37
4.4
2.75
287.2
109.16
4.2
2.63
280.9
108.97
4.0
2.51
274.4
108.77
3.8
2.40
268.3
108.57
3.6
2.29
262.1
108.37
3.4
2.19
256.3
108.18
3.2
2.09
250.4
107.97
3.0
2.00
244.9
107.78
2.8
1.90
238.7
107.56
2.6
1.82
233.7
107.37
2.4
1.74
228.5
107.18
2.2
1.66
223.2
106.97
2.0
1.58
217.7
106.76
1.8
1.51
212.8
106.56
1.6
1.45
208.6
106.38
1.4
1.38
203.5
106.17
1.2
1.32
199.0
105.98
1.0
1.26
194.4
105.77
A PPENDIX A
C URRENT AND VOLTAGE D ISTRIBUTIONS
For the antenna vertical wire, it is well known that the
current and voltage distributions along a low loss transmission
line, of characteristic impedance Z 0m , are given by [8]
I(z) = I0 cos z j
V0
sin z
Z0m
(71)
(72)
0zH
Where I0 and V0 are the antenna input current and voltage.
V0 = j Xa I0
(73)
Xa
I(z) = I0 cos z +
sin z
Z0m
(74)
(75)
0zH
At the antenna top, z = H,
It
I(z = H)
Xa
=
= cos H +
sin H
I0
I0
Z0m
Vt = V(z = H) = j I0 (Xa cos H Z0m sin H)
(76)
(77)
It
Vt
cos j
sin
n
Z0t
(78)
19
V() = Vt cos j
It
Z0t sin
n
A PPENDIX B
N EAR F IELD
(79)
0L
Where It and Vt are the antenna top current and voltage.
R2 = (z z )2 + 2
(93)
Vt = j Xt It
r21 = (z H)2 + 2
(94)
r22 = (z + H)2 + 2
(95)
r 2 = z 2 + 2
(96)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
0L
At the top-load wire tip,
IL = I( = L) = 0
Z0t
VL = V( = L) = j It Xt cos L
sin L
n
(84)
I(z) =
Im sin ( + + z) for H z 0
Im sin ( z) for
0zH
Where
I(z) = I0 cos z
2
Xa
I m = I0 1 +
Z0m
Xa
= arctan
Z0m
(85)
(86)
0zH
(87)
Vt = j I0 Z0m sin H
(88)
It
n
cos
sin
tan Lres
VL = j I0
Z0t cos H
n sin Lres
0 Im
Az =
4
(89)
0 Lres
(91)
(92)
(99)
(100)
(101)
Thus,
Z0t
sin
V() = j I0 cos H Z0m tan H cos +
n
(90)
IL = 0
It
= cos H
I0
I() =
(98)
H
H
sin ( + + z )
sin ( z )
ejR
dz
R
(102)
ejR
dz
R
or
0 Im j H ej(R+z )
Az = j
e
dz
8
R
0
H j(Rz )
e
ej
dz
R
0
0 j(Rz )
+
e
dz
ej
R
H
0 j(R+z )
+
e
dz
+ ej
R
H
Then, the magnetic and electric fields are given by
(103)
20
1 Az
0
(104)
r1
= r H cos
(111)
j 1 ( H )
0
(105)
r2
= r + H cos
(112)
H =
Ez =
Im
H
H =
ej 1
ej(r1 +H) ej (106)
4
r1
H
j
j(r1 H)
j
e
e
1+
e
r1
j(r1 +H)
j Im
H
H
j e
Ez =
e
j 1
(107)
4 0
r1
r21
r1
+j ej
ej
ej(r1 H)
r1
H
H
+ j 1 +
r21
r1
+j ej
I0 ejr1
2
H
cos H + j sin H
r1
A PPENDIX C
FAR F IELD
The far fields can be obtained from (104) and (105) using
the transformation from cylindrical to spherical coordinates.
Therefore,
= r sin
=
(110)
z = r cos
Im ejr
f ()
2 r
E = j Z00
Im ejr
f ()
2 r
(113)
(114)
Where
sin (H ) cos (H cos )
(115)
sin
sin cos (H ) cos sin (H cos )
+
sin
is the top-loaded monopole antenna field radiation pattern, Z00 = 377 is the free space intrinsic impedance, I m
is given by (99) and by (100).
f () =
(108)
H = j
f0 () =
H cos H j H cos H sin H
+
r31
r21
r1
(109)
The magnetic field expression is exactly the same obtained
by Wait and Surtees [11] by means of a different approach,
assuming a sinusoidal antenna current distribution. In this
presentation, the current distribution has been obtained by
means of an equivalent transmission line model. In this case,
the maximum current I m in (99) depends on the antenna
reactance Xa and is going to be I 0 when the antenna is
resonant (Xa = 0), while the parameter in (100) is going
to be zero.
j I0 ejr1
Ez =
2 0
H I0 ejr
sin
2
r
E = j Z00
H I0 ejr
sin
2
r
(117)
(118)
Where
f() = sin
(119)
I0 ej
sin H
2
E = j Z00
I0 ej
sin H
2
(120)
(121)
21
TABLE XIV
Ez = j Z00
I0 e
2
sin H
(122)
H/
dBi
0.010
3.0008
4.7724
0.015
3.0018
4.7738
0.020
3.0032
4.7758
0.025
3.0049
4.7783
0.030
3.0071
4.7814
0.035
3.0096
4.7851
0.040
3.0125
4.7893
0.045
3.0158
4.7941
0.050
3.0195
4.7993
(124)
0.055
3.0235
4.8051
0.060
3.0279
4.8114
0.065
3.0327
4.8182
0.070
3.0377
4.8255
0.075
3.0432
4.8332
0.080
3.0489
4.8414
0.085
3.0549
4.8500
0.090
3.0613
4.8591
0.095
3.0680
4.8685
0.100
3.0749
4.8783
A PPENDIX D
D IRECTIVITY
The antenna directivity D can be expressed as
4
D=
B
(123)
Where
B=
/2
d
0
P(, )
sin d
Pmax
f 2 ()
P()
= 20
Pmax
f0 (/2)
(125)
+
B=
4H
2H
2 sin2 H
(126)
Where
0
4H
1 cos u
du
u
sin 4H sin 2H
+
cos 2H 1 + Cin(4H)
4H
2H
(130)
Where the Cin function is given by (127).
In Table XV the resonant top-loaded antenna radiation
resistance has been calculated using the exact expression
(130), the approximate equation (54), where the top to base
current ratio I t /I0 = cos H is taken into account, and the
Hertz monopole radiation resistance (44), where I t /I0 = 1.
It can be seen that the Hertz monopole expression (44) can
only be used for antenna heights less than 0.04, while the
approximate expression (54) is valid up to 0.1 with an error
less than 5%.
Rrad = 15
cos 2H 1 + Cin(4H)
Cin(4H) =
(127)
A PPENDIX E
R ADIATION R ESISTANCE
A PPENDIX F
W IRE L OSS R ESISTANCE
2 Wrad
=
I20
(128)
Where Wrad is the power radiated into space by the toploaded antenna, and I 0 is the peak value of the antenna input
current.
Following the standard procedure [5], the radiation resistance of a resonant top-loaded antenna will be
/2
f02 () sin d
(129)
Rrad = 60
0
I (z) dz + n
0
Lres
I () d
(131)
Where
1
Rl =
a
and
f 0
4 c
(132)
22
TABLE XV
A PPENDIX G
G ROUND P LANE E QUIVALENT L OSS R ESISTANCE
H/
Exact
Approx.
Hertz
0.010
0.15766
0.15760
0.15791
0.015
0.35405
0.35373
0.35531
0.020
0.62768
0.62668
0.63165
0.025
0.97727
0.97485
0.98696
0.030
1.40120
1.39620
1.42120
0.035
1.89740
1.88810
1.93440
0.040
2.46360
2.44790
2.52660
0.045
3.09710
3.07200
3.19780
0.050
3.79500
3.75700
3.94780
0.055
4.55400
4.49870
4.77690
0.060
5.37070
5.29270
5.68490
0.065
6.24110
6.13440
6.67190
0.070
7.16140
7.01890
7.73780
0.075
8.12740
7.94090
8.88260
0.080
9.13460
8.89500
10.1060
0.085
10.1780
9.87570
11.4090
0.090
11.2540
10.8770
12.7910
0.095
12.3580
11.8940
14.2520
0.100
13.4830
12.9190
15.7910
I(z) = I0 cos z
I() =
I0 cos H
n
Rgp
sin
tan Lres
2
I20
(133)
sin 2Lres
4
(134)
Therefore,
sin 2H
H+
(137)
2
1
cos2 H Lres
1+
+
n
2
tan2 Lres
sin 2Lres
1
cos 2Lres 1
+
1
+
4
2 tan Lres
tan2 Lres
Rc = Rl
1
2
| H | Rs d
2
R0
/2
| H |2 Rs d =
R0
2 + H2
Rs
R
0
cos2 H
ln
2
R0 2 + 4 H2
sin2 H
+ ln
2 R0
1
cos H Lres
1+
(136)
2
2
n
2
tan Lres
1
cos 2Lres 1
1
+
2 tan Lres
tan2 Lres
I2 () d =
| H | Rg d +
/2
R0
(140)
A PPENDIX H
G LOSSARY OF S YMBOLS
and
I20
2
i=K
2
| H |2 Rg d
| H (i ) |2 Rg (i ) i wi
= 2
I0
0
i=1
(139)
Where {wi } are the weights of an adaptive Gauss-Lobatto
quadrature rule.
The second integration can be carried out to give
2
I20
R0
0 Lres
(138)
Where
H is the near magnetic field given by (108) [A/m].
Rg is the artificial ground plane resistance at the operation
frequency, given by (62) [].
Rs is the soil resistance at the operation frequency, given
by (60) [].
0zH
cos
2
= 2
I0
a
A
a0
B
Ct
D
E
r
f0 ()
f ()
G
H
H
I0
I()
It
I(z)
j
1 imaginary unit.
23
Jsu
L
Lres
n
nc
R EFERENCES
[1] V. Trainotti, Short Medium Frequency AM Antennas, IEEE Trans. on
Broadcasting, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 263-284, Sept. 2001.
[2] S. A. Schelkunoff and H. T. Friis, Antenna Theory and Practice, John
Wiley & Sons, N. Y., 1952.
[3] E. Laport, Radio Antenna Engineering, Mc. Graw Hill, N. Y., 1952.
[4] E. C. Jordan, Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems, PrenticeHall Inc., N. Y., 1950.
[5] J. D. Kraus, Antennas, Mc. Graw Hill, N. Y., 1950.
[6] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons,
N. Y., 1982, 1997.