Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
upper arm, head, chest, thigh, calf, and abdominal were measured and rounded to the nearest 0.1 cm.
Skinfold thicknesses at biceps, triceps, and thigh, to the 0.2 mm.
RESULTS
In the first table displayed, it showed that 20.23% of the 504 babies were low birth weight. In
table 3, it was revealed that the optimum cut off point identifying low birth weight newborns was
47.45 cm for crown heel length, 32.52 cm for head circumference, 29.16 cm for chest
circumference, 8.44 cm for mid arm circumference, 28.40 cm for abdominal circumference,
11.63 cm for thigh circumference, 8.56 cm for calf circumference, 3.23 mm for subscapular
skinfold, 3.38 mm for biceps skinfold, 3.90 mm for triceps skinfold and 4.71 mm for thigh
skinfold. All of these were found to be important factors of the birth weights.
DISCUSSION
The high dominance of low birth weight in Indian babies is directly related to neonatal fatality.
The scientific factors of what cause mothers to carry low birth weight babies should be an issue
that is taken seriously. It needs to be studied to see what can be done to prevent this from
occurring so often. Keep in mind, that the cut off measurements listed above are specific for the
area of Hoshiarpur district, in Punjab, India. At 20.24% low birth weight, the findings in this
study population were smaller compared to the original percentage put out by the UNICEF
(2004) i.e. the incidence of low birth weight in India is 30%
REFERENCES
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. 1988. Anthropometric Standardization Reference
Manual. Human Kinetics Chmpaign, IL
United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF)/ World Health Organisation (WHO) (2004).
Low birth weight: Country, Regional and Global estimates. New York. UNICEF