Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Artist:JacquesLouisDavid
SLOPES
SLOPES
1.
2.
3
3.
4.
5.
Introduction
Classificationoflandslides
M h d f
Methodsofanalysis
l i
Investigationofexistinglandslides
g
g
Methodsofstabilisation
Landslidepotentialin
th U it d Ki d
theUnitedKingdom
BGS
Landfill(Midlothian)
Source:BritishGeologicalAssociation
PanAmericanHighway,ElSalvador(2003)
PhotobyEdHarp,USGS.
FolkestoneWarren,Kent
http://www.bgs.ac.uk/science/landusea
nddevelopment/landslides/casestudies.
html
(1915)
(2002)
LagunaBeach,USA(2005)
http://landslides.usgs.gov/learning/photos/california__u.s._/laguna_beach_and_blue_bird__ca_landslides
SantaTecla,ElSalvador(2001)
EdHarp,USGS
http://landslides.usgs.gov/learning/photos/internati
onal
MASS MOVEMENT
MASSMOVEMENT
Definition:
The movement of masses of geological material on the
surface of the earth due to gravitational effects. This
definition distinguishes mass movement from mass
transport which includes fluvial processes. Note that
transport
landslides are just one type of mass movement.
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
Spiti,India
http://www.ig.tuwien.ac.at/Research/Research_subaqueous
_
_artesian_springs.htm
_p g
Valleyrebound
y
Vendsyssel,Denmark
http://www geus dk/publications/bull/nr8/nr8 p060 089 dk htm
http://www.geus.dk/publications/bull/nr8/nr8_p060089dk.htm
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
Creep
It is a continuous displacement under constant shear
stress s. Normally, during creep s < , where is the
shear strength of the soil. Creep can precede failure
(landslide occurs after a period of creep) or may follow
failure (due to strain softening). Note that seasonal
changes such as soil wetting and drying as well as
freeze/thaw imply volume changes in the soil mass.
Hence a movement.
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
Golden,Colorado
http://www.env.duke.edu/eos/geo41/geo41.htm
Lobe,Alaska
NationalOceanicandAtmosferic
Administration(NOAA)
(
)
Creep
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
Landslide
LasColinasLandslide ElSalvador,Feb2003
http://www.geo.mtu.edu/~ywlewis/
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
Otago,NewZealand
Otago,NewZealand
Ot
OtagoDailyTimeshttp://www.odt.co.nz
D il Ti
htt //
dt
Ot
OtagoDailyTimeshttp://www.odt.co.nz
D il Ti
htt //
dt
Blockfalls,topplingandboulderfalls
Forexample,duetoicewedgingorthermaleffects
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPESOFMOVEMENT
http://cavern.com/cavescience/
Subsidence
It can occur due to solution of underlying strata,
strata
thawing of ice or internal/subsurface erosion.
Subsidence can also be manmade
man made due to mining and
pumping (water, oil, etc.)
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
SOMEMETHODS
a)) consideringthewatercontentoftheslidingmass
g
g
b) landslidegeometry
c)) landslidemechanism
(geotechnicalclassification).
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Water content)
(Watercontent)
State
Semi
Semi
solid
B ittl
Brittle
Pl ti
Plastic
Li id
Liquid
wnat
0
SL
PL
LL
LI=0
LI=1
LI
LI<<0
LI>1
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Water content)
(Watercontent)
Jonathan Hayward
JonathanHayward
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca
LI
LI<<0
LI=0
LI=1
LI>1
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Water content)
(Watercontent)
NorthernIreland Dikauetal(1996)
(
)
LI
LI<<0
LI=0
LI=1
LI>1
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Water content)
(Watercontent)
LI
LI<<0
LI=0
LI=1
LI>1
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Water content)
(Watercontent)
Dunkeld,Scotland(2004)
Dunkeld
Scotland (2004)
PicturebyAlanMcKenzie
LI
LI<<0
LI=0
LI=1
LI>1
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Geometry)
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(Geometry)
Thepreviousdirectshearboxresults
correspondsto
27%
24%
17%
15%
15%
A
lo
A
n
or
m
al
ly
co
n
so
l
id
at
ed
.. .
os
es
an
A
ov
d
d
er
en
c
A
se
on
ns
sa
so
w
nd
er
lid
s3
a
te
A
a
d
ns
nd
cla
w
4
er
y
a
s1
re
co
a
nd
rre
2
ct
ar
ec
or
re
ct
2%
A
n
1 A
1.
Anormallyconsolidated
normally consolidated
clay
2. Aloosesand
3 Adensesand
3.
A dense sand
4. Anoverconsolidated
clay
5. Answers3and4are
Answers 3 and 4 are
correct
6 Answers1and2are
6.
A
1 d2
correct
Thepreviousdirectshearboxresults
correspondsto
52%
17%
22%
an
d
a
n
o
r..
.
rm
.. .
n
o
d
a
en
se
sa
nd
A
d
an
d
a
os
es
an
d
an
A
lo
en
se
sa
nd
A
d
os
es
an
d
an
d
a
n
o
n
o
ve
.. .
ve
.. .
9%
A
lo
1. Aloosesandandan
overconsolidatedclay
2. Adensesandandan
overconsolidatedclay
3. Aloosesandanda
normallyconsolidated
o a y co so da ed
clay
4 Adensesandanda
4.
A dense sand and a
normallyconsolidated
clay
Thepreviousshearstrengthenvelope
correspondsto
1. Totalstressandlong
termconditions
2. Totalstressandshort
termconditions
3. Effectivestressand
longtermconditions
o g e co d o s
4. Effectivestressand
shortterm conditions
shorttermconditions
40%
29%
26%
or
..
nd
sh
re
ss
a
nd
lo
ng
. .
.
Ef
fe
ct
ive
st
re
ss
a
or
t
fe
ct
ive
st
nd
sh
Ef
ls
ot
a
T
ot
a
ls
tre
ss
a
tre
ss
a
nd
lo
ng
te
..
te
..
5%
Thepreviousshearstrengthenvelope
correspondsto
1. ResultsfromCD
triaxialtests
2. ResultsfromUU
tests
3. ResultsfromCU
triaxialtests
4 ResultsfromUD
4.
Results from UD
triaxialtests
58%
21%
m
U
ts
U
fr
te
om
st
s
C
U
R
tri
es
ul
ax
ts
ia
fr
lt
om
.. .
U
D
tr
iax
ia
lt
...
es
ul
ts
fr
o
R
es
ul
R
es
ul
ts
f
ro
m
C
D
tr
iax
ia
lt
...
8%
13%
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
(
(Mechanism)
)
Strength properties
Strengthproperties
Firsttime
First time
Reactivated
Progressive
Progressive
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
Strengthproperties
Strength
properties
Firsttime
Reactivated
Reactivated
Progressive
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
Porepressureregime
Shortterm
Intermediateterm
I t
di t t
Longterm
Rapiddrawdown
Criticalpoollevel
C iti l
ll l
CLASSIFICATIONOF
LANDSLIDES
Pore pressure regime
Porepressureregime
Short
Shortterm
term
Intermediateterm
Long
Longterm
term
Rapid
Rapiddrawdown
drawdown
Criticalpoollevel
LLawCodeofHammurabi
C d fH
bi
KingofBabylon
1792 1750 BC
17921750BC
R.M.N./H.Lewandowski
Royalhead,knownasthe
Royal
head, known as the "Head
Headof
of
Hammurabi
MuseduLouvre/OiCheongLee
/
g
HAMMURABISCODE
228 Ifabuilderbuildahouseforsomeoneandcompleteit,heshallgivehimafee
oftwoshekelsinmoneyforeachsar ofsurface.
229 Ifabuilderbuildahouseforsomeone,anddoesnotconstructitproperly,and
If a builder build a house for some one and does not construct it properly and
thehousewhichhebuiltfallinandkillitsowner,thenthatbuildershallbeputto
death.
230 Ifitkillthesonoftheownerthesonofthatbuildershallbeputtodeath.
If it kill the son of the owner the son of that builder shall be put to death
231 Ifitkillaslaveoftheowner,thenheshallpayslaveforslavetotheownerof
thehouse.
232 Ifitruingoods,heshallmakecompensationforallthathasbeenruined,and
inasmuchashedidnotconstructproperlythishousewhichhebuiltanditfell,he
shallreerectthehousefromhisownmeans.
233 Ifabuilderbuildahouseforsomeone,eventhoughhehasnotyetcompleted
it;ifthenthewallsseemtoppling,thebuildermustmakethewallssolidfromhis
ownmeans.
Collapseleadstomanslaughterchargefor
Collapse
leads to manslaughter charge for
geotechnicsfirm
30April2009|ByAlexandraWynne
GroundengineeringspecialistCotswoldGeotechnicalHoldingslastweekbecamethe
firstcompanytobechargedwithcorporatemanslaughterundertheCorporate
ManslaughterandCorporateHomicideAct2007.
GeologistAlexanderWrightdiedinSeptemberlastyearwhiletakingsoilsamplesina
pitwhichhadbeenexcavatedaspartofasitesurvey.
it hi h h d b
t d
t f it
Thesidesofthepitcollapsed,crushinghimtodeath.
CostwoldGeotechnicaldirectorPeterEatonhasalsobeenchargedwithgross
negligencemanslaughter,whichcarriesamaximumsentenceoflife
imprisonment.
Underthenewcorporatemanslaughtercharge,anorganisationisguiltyifabreachin
dutyofcaretothepersonwhodiedissubstantiallydowntoaseniormanagement
failing.
AnnMetherall,apartneratlawfirmBurgesSalmonsaidthecorporatemanslaughter
charge could be more easily levelled at a small firm. It
chargecouldbemoreeasilylevelledatasmallfirm.
Itisunsurprisingthatthefirst
is unsurprising that the first
prosecutionundertheActisagainstasmallcompany,notleastbecausethereis
unlikelytobeanyissuesindefiningseniormanagement,saidMetherall.Iwonder
whetherabigcompanyinsimilarcircumstanceswouldfinditselfprosecuted.
http://www nce co uk/5201397 article
http://www.nce.co.uk/5201397.article
METHODSOFANALYSIS
FORSLOPESTABILITY
POSSIBILITIES
Compatibility=Doesittellyouhowthesoildeforms?
Constit.Behaviour=Doesitsimulaterealsoilbehaviour?
Disp.=Displacement
SolutionRequirement
EEquilibrium
Co
ompatibility
d
d
Boundaryconditions
ConstitutiveBehaviour
Closedform
Linearelastic
Limit
Limit
equilibrium
NS
Rigidwithfailure
Rigid
with failure
criterion
NS
Stressfields
NS
Rigidwithfailure
criterion
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Limit
analysis
Method
Lower
bound
Upper
bound
Idealplasticitywith
associatedflowrule
Beamspring
approaches
Soilmodelledbysprings
orelasticinteraction
factors
Fullnumericalanalysis
Any
S=Satisfied,NS=NotSatisfied
Force
Disp.
LIMITEQUILIBRIUM
The most common method for
slope stability analysis.
Assumeafailuresurface
It
does
not
consider
compatibility or displacement
boundary conditions (i.e. its
solutions are not unique)
Applystaticequilibriumto
Apply
static equilibrium to
thesoilmass
FindfactorofsafetyF or
otherunknownparameter
PLANAR MOVEMENTS
PLANARMOVEMENTS
PLANARMOVEMENTS
PLANARMOVEMENTS
THEINFINITESLOPE
THEINFINITESLOPE
Totalstressanalysis(1/2)
1. Solveparallelto
theslipsurface:
2.Solve
p p
perpendicularto
theslipsurface:
THEINFINITESLOPE
Totalstressanalysis(2/2)
3.WhatareS andW?
3.FindF:
THEINFINITESLOPE
Totalstressanalysis(2/2)
3.WhatareS andW?
3.FindF:
THEINFINITESLOPE
Effectivestressanalysis(1/2)
1.Staticequilibrium
2 What is S now?
2.WhatisS
3.Replacevariables...
THEINFINITESLOPE
Effectivestressanalysis(2/2)
4.Staticequilibrium
5 Find F
5.FindF
THEINFINITESLOPE
Seepageincluded
THEINFINITESLOPE
Seepageincluded
THEINFINITESLOPE
Seepageincluded
THEINFINITESLOPE
Seepageincluded
2. h=Zand c=0?