Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

Horizontal Well Technology

List of Tables

List of Tables
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Table 1.1: Horizontal well application & completion -wells operated by Elf
Table 1.2: The results of Chevron horizontal drilling program.
Table 1.3: Weyburn Performance, Underbalanced Drilling (Edmonds & Moroney96)
CHAPTER 2
DRILLING OVERVIEW
Table 2.1: Bottom-hole assembly tools
Table 2.2: Deviating tools
Table 2.3: Classification of Horizontal Wells
CHAPTER 3
WELL COMPLETIONS
Table 3.1: Data for the Case Study # 1(optimization)
CHAPTER 4
RESERVOIR ENGINEERING CONCEPT
Table 4.1: Ranges of Parameters Surveyed, Liquid Recovery (Novy, 1992)
Table 4.2: Ranges of Parameters Surveyed, Gas Recovery (Novy, 1992)
CHAPTER 5
HORIZONTAL WELL PERFORMANCE PREDICTION
Table 5.1: Reservoir and Well Data for the Example Case
Table 5.3: Comparison of Solution Techniques: Initial Oil Production Rate
CHAPTER 6
NEW TRENDS IN HORIZONTAL WELL TECHNOLOGY
Table 6.1: Potential Applications of Multilateral Wells (Salas et al, 1996)
Table 6.2: Horizontal Plane Shape Factors for Various Multiple-Lateral
Table 6.3: Horizontal well Shape Factors (Economides et al., 1994)

T-1

KADE Technologies, 2002

Horizontal Well Technology

Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table

List of Tables

6.4 : Single Lateral Well data in the Dos Cuadras Field (Vo & Madden95)
6.5: Trilateral Well Data Vo and Madden (1994)
6.9: Single-Lateral Well Data
6.10: Trilateral Well Data
6.11: Average Costs to Re-enter Vertical Wells and Drill Multi-Laterals
6.6: Production and cost performance comparison for the branched holes:
6.7
6.8: CS Resources Pelican Lake Reservoir Properties

CHAPTER 7
HORIZONTAL WELLS APPLICATIONS IN WATERFLOODED RESERVOIRS
No tables
CHAPTER 8
Coning
Table 8.1Coefficient in the third-order polynomial for optimum well placement
Table 8.2
Coefficient in the third-order polynomial for breakthrough time, t BTD, two-cone
case
Table 8.3:
Average fluid properties in Prudhoe Bay Field (Espie et al,94)
Table 8.4:
Summary of the Nows Studied (Pucknell and Browman, 1994)
Table 8.5:
Comparison of Oil Produced by Nows and Analogous Offset Conventional Wells
(Pucknell and Browman, 1994)
Table 8.6:
Rock and fluid properties for the Troll Oil filed (Haug, 1992)
CHAPTER 9
TRANSIENT PRESSURE RESPONSES - WELL TESTING
TABLE 9.1:
COMPARISON OF HORIZONTAL WELL PRESSURE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
MODELS
Table 9.2:
SUMMARY OF TRANSIENT PRESSURE TEST ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
Table 9.3:
SUMMARY OF TRANSIENT PRESSURE TEST ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
CHAPTER 10
GAS RESERVOIRS
Table 10.1: Schematic of the System Upon Which Tables 10.2 to 10.4 are Based
Table 10.2: Shape Factors, Cf, for Fractured Vertical Wells Located Centrally in the Rectangle
Drainage Area (Mutalik et al., 1988)
Table 10.3: Shape Factors, Cf, for Off-centered Fractured Vertical Wells (Mutalik et al., 1988)
Table 10.4

T-2

KADE Technologies, 2002

Horizontal Well Technology

List of Tables

Table 10.5: Success rate of horizontal gas wells drilled in the United States
Table 10.6: Reservoir description for the AECs Suffield Glauconitic sandstone formation
Table 10.7: Average Reservoir Parameters of AEC Suffield
TABLE 10.8: AEC SUFFIELD
TABLE 10.9: AEC SUFFIELD
CHAPTER 11
RESERVOIR SIMULATION
No Tables
CHAPTER 12
EOR APPLICATIONS
HEAVY OIL
Table 2
Table 12.1a: Error Function
Table 12.1 CANADIAN SAGD FIELD PROJECTS
Table 12.4: World Bitumen Resources (Meyer and Fulton, 1982)
Table 12.5: Range of Estimated Contributions of Four Key Mechanisms to CSS Oil Recovery (% of
base-case oil recovery) (Denbina et al., 1991)
Table 12.6: Rock and Fluid Properties used to Compare Production Performance in Heavy Oil
Reservoirs
Table12.7: Calculated Thermal Conductivity for Oil Sands with = 0.35 (Somerton et al., 1974,
Butler,1991)
Table 12.8: Effect of Shale Laminations
Table 12.9: Llyodminister Sand Reservoir and Fluid Properties Tangleflags North Steamflood
(Edmonds et al., 1993)
CHAPTER 13
AIR INJECTION
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table

13.10: In-situ Combustion Operations Characteristics Battrum (Vertical Wells)


13.11: Battrum Comparison Performance
13.1: Physical and Chemical Properties of Marguerite Lake Crude
13.2: Sandpack Properties
13.3: Combustion Model Operating Conditions
13.4: Sweep Efficiency

T-3

KADE Technologies, 2002

Potrebbero piacerti anche