Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SELLIN
Translated
by
and
GEORG
DAVID
FOHRER,
GREEN.
New
REVIEWS
301
dating of Psalms (Fohrer thinks over 62%
are post-exilic); (4) division of Psalms
as to content rather than form, and exag
gerated emphasis upon Zion; (5) assump
tion of a unified ancient Near Eastern
culture; and (6) stress on the lateness
of writing.
Larue's book is appropriately named,
for his strength lies in the portrayal of
Old Testament life, rather than in literary
analysis. I am painfully aware that the
book lacks adequate treatment of proph
ecy (especially at Mari), or of Wisdom
in the ancient world, or of the forms of
poetry. But the fine contrast of prophecy
and apocalyptic, the provocative analysis
of (movement from the general to
the particular, as in creation-man-Noah;
genealogies; covenants; divine names)
and of E's variety, the excellent descrip
tion of David as pathetic hero and of Solo
mon (with welcome reserve as to his role
in Wisdom) do much to remove the
disappointment.
The two authors often agree, particu
larly as to the literary development of
exilic and post-exilic Judaism. They agree
on the dating of hopeful passages within
prophetic literature (Mie. 4-5), and of
Joel, Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, and
Esther. Whereas Larue uses progressive
interpretation, Fohrer prefers source
analysis and supplementation (JNEDP,
no Deuteronomic history). Larue sees Job
as a satire that shows the futility of theo
logical discussion, while Fohrer's exten
sive research in this book leads him to
these conclusions: Chap. 3 is Job's first
speech and Chaps. 29-31 a divine chal
lenge; extra-biblical literature is related
to Job only inform; the book's purpose is
not theoretical but the concrete question as
to how a devout sufferer should conduct
himself. Fohrer calls Deutero-Isaiah the
beginning of prophecy's decline (nation
alistic and materialistic); Larue stresses
its background in the Akitu festival (cf.
the Azazel ritual and Royal Zion psalms).
Fohrer interprets Ecclesiastes in light of
302
the Gilgamesh Epic, Lamentations in the ancient Near East and a valuable
connection with extra-biblical material, addition to our library of text books.
and Song of Solomon as artistic rather Fohrer's introduction, unmatched by any,
than popular. He denies a polemical tone will occupy a prominent place on the desk
to Ruth. Larue disagrees.
of all who wish to understand the literMy objections to Fohrer's treatment ature of the Old Testament on a scholare minor. The practice of placing au- arly level.
thors' names in parentheses after an arguJ. L. CRENSHAW
ment often fails to make clear whether
these men are attacked or quoted for
Mercer University
substantiation; it is improbable that a
nationalistic prophet like Nahum would
himself have chosen a poem of such religious vitality as Chap. 3 ; and it is unlikely
that the story of Hosea's marriage contains an implicit message of salvation. Twentieth Century Interpretations of the
Book of Job. Edited by PAUL S. SANDERS.
Larue's treatment, however, requires
Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey: Prencriticism at a number of substantial
tice-Hall,
Inc.,
1968. vii+118 pages.
points. Besides the chronological ap$3.95.
proach, I object to a certain imbalance,
both in regard to coverage of works like
Of the collecting of critical (and
Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, Song of Solomon, pseudo-critical essays) there is apparently
and in regard to documentation. Often no end. This collection of 20th century
inferior literature is cited, while striking pieces on Job contains three articles from
omissions occur (Johnson: Jonah 2; Noth: journals and seven excerpts from books.
Micah and Danites; Hyatt, Eissfeldt: The selections range in quality from the
deity, Bethel; Alt: apodictic law; Robin- patently outrageous woolgathering of
son: divine council; Wolff: knowledge in Arnold Toynbee from A Study of History
Hosea; Otto: idea of holiness, and so to the clear and incisive distinctions beforth). Despite stating the intention to tween tragedy and religion made by D. D.
discuss the Old Testament on a level ap- Raphael in The Paradox of Tragedy. As
propriate to sophisticated students, Larue an interpretation, the latter is perhaps
attacks Mosaic authorship of the Penta- the best in the book. It shows a command
teuch and the unity of Isaiah. Giving the of perspective not shared by all contribimpression that pioneer work has been utors. Kissane's "The Metrical Strucdone by English and American scholars, ture ojob" stands alone as an exclusively
he rarely refers to works in other lan- factual and analytical essay.
guages. Furthermore, the author's archaeIn his presentation, Richard Sewall
ological interest limits the choice of hardly supports the epithet he gives Job:
journals and literature cited; this gives a "the towering tragic figure of antiquity"
one-sided view which the supplementary (p. 21). In contrast, Raphael (p. 53) does
bibliography does not completely correct. not find Job tragic "because the grandeur
Many errors were allowed to creep into of the hero is deliberately shrunk to
the text (over 75, as opposed to a scant nothing before the sublimity of the power
dozen in Fohrer): such as, incorrect he has questioned." In fact, Raphael (p.
spellings (Uppsala), confusion of Hebrew 55) considers religion of the Bible inimiletters, reversal of an illustration, and cal to tragedy "first because it is optimistwo omissions of complete sentences. tic and trusts that evil is always a necesDespite these weaknesses, Larue's sary means to greater good, and secondly
book is a first-rate introduction to life in because it abases man before the sublim-
^ s
Copyright and Use:
As an ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use
according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as
otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.
No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the
copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,
reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a
violation of copyright law.
This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permission
from the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal
typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,
for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.
Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specific
work for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered
by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the
copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,
or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).
About ATLAS:
The ATLA Serials (ATLAS) collection contains electronic versions of previously
published religion and theology journals reproduced with permission. The ATLAS
collection is owned and managed by the American Theological Library Association
(ATLA) and received initial funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.
The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the American
Theological Library Association.