Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
Since its invention in the early 1990s, fused deposition
modelling (FDM) has become one of the most popular
additive manufacturing techniques, involving extrusion
of plastic filaments1 to give layer by layer deposition.
Extensive efforts have been devoted to construct the
relationship between the process parameters and the
mechanical properties of the FDM part. The typical
process parameters that determine the geometrical
structure of the filaments include raster angle, raster
width, air gap, layer thickness and build orientation.
A series of build rules was proposed for improved
mechanical properties of FDM parts from acrylonitrile
butadiene styrene (ABS) P400 material using a design of
experiments approach.2 The concept of locally controlled
properties using optimised deposition density and orientation was also proposed for FDM3 and a laminate theory
developed for fibre reinforced composites was implemented for FDM using the analogy of macroscale represented
by laminate layers consisting of bonded laminas and the
microscale represented by the filament and gaps/voids
resulting from the space filling algorithms and interfaces.
The dynamics of bond formation between polymer
filaments with thermal analysis and sintering experiments under different conditions have been reported.4
The cooling conditions play an important role in the
1
2015
VOL
31
NO
895
Rezayat et al.
1 a illustration of FDM process parameters in FEA model; b 3D illustration of lament scale structure with negative, zero
and positive air gaps respectively; c example cross-section of extruded lament obtained from computed tomography
scanning image of dissected FDM part
FE method
FE model
To investigate the relationship between the filament
scale structure and the macroscopic property, the
following simplifying assumptions were made:
(i) the extruded filaments have homogeneous and
isotropic properties with no defects
(ii) the extruded filaments are uniform and have the
same constant cross-section profile that is
determined by the extrusion parameters
(iii) the bonds between filaments are perfect and have
the same mechanical properties as the filament
(iv) the FDM part is loaded in the elastic regime of
the materials and the applied mechanical load
did not lead to plastic deformations
896
2015
VOL
31
NO
2 Illustration of boundary conditions: geometric constraints on left end with uniformed distributed load on
right end
Rezayat et al.
Method of analysis
Materials respond to external mechanical load by
converting the mechanical work into strain energy under
isothermal conditions (i.e. the heat produced by the
external work is assumed to be negligible in a tensile
test). Therefore, we can examine the strain energy
distribution in the materials to measure the local
contribution of the materials in sharing the external
load, for elastic loading conditions. In the ideal case, the
load should be uniformly shared and the strain energy
distribution should be homogeneous throughout the
FDM part. However, it is expected that for FDM
process the irregular geometry of the filament scale
structure will change the local behaviour of the materials
(i.e. the local strain energy stored in the materials) and
Table 1 Process parameters used in this study for layer
made by FDM
Build parameter
Values
Raster angle/u
Air gap/mm
0
20.05
Table 2 Properties of
simulations
ABS
45
0.00
P430
used
Property
Value
Unit
37
2.32
0.35
0.83
108
MPa
GPa
GPa
uC
FE results
90
z0.05
lament
in
2015
VOL
31
NO
897
Rezayat et al.
4 Strain energy density distribution in FDM part for different raster angles and air gaps
898
2015
VOL
31
NO
Rezayat et al.
6 Strain energy density distribution for samples with various raster angles and air gaps
Experimental results
Effective Youngs modulus
Design value
Layer thickness/mm
Raster/contour width/mm
Raster angle/u
Raster to raster air gap/mm
Contour to raster air gap/mm
0.2540
0.3806
0, 45, 90
20.05, 0.00, z0.05
0
2015
VOL
31
NO
899
Rezayat et al.
7 a, b demonstration of test set-up: tensile test machine and DIC system; c sample set-up and speckle patterns
900
2015
VOL
31
NO
Rezayat et al.
9 Axial strain eld (in direction of applied load) obtained from experiments for samples with various raster angles and
air gaps
failure and modelling of FDM parts need to accommodate such complex failure criterion. For all samples
excluding the one with raster angle of 45u and air gap of
zero, increasing the raster angle or the air gap increased
the strain energy density on the surface especially on the
contour regions of the samples. The regions with highest
amount of strain energy density are observed to be at the
contours with a high difference in energy density when
compared with the rasters area. This indicates contour
region experiences a significantly higher amount of
energy density when compared with the raster area.
Energywise, the ratio of energy to mass for contours has
a higher amount in comparison to that of the raster area,
meaning that the material utility of the features of FDM
10 Strain energy density distribution from experimental study for samples with various raster angle and air gaps
2015
VOL
31
NO
901
Rezayat et al.
11 Engineering stress versus apparent strain in loading direction obtained from experiments for samples with various
raster angle and air gaps
902
2015
VOL
31
NO
Rezayat et al.
procedure, provides a new approach to develop fundamental understanding of the processproperty relationships during fused deposition modelling. This approach
is potentially much more effective than the knowledge
gained from the expensive and limited results available
through the currently used empirical approach.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Matthew Young,
Eastman Professor or Practice at the University of
Tennessee, for assistance in making the FDM samples
used in the analyses, as well as Dr. C. Duty and Dr V.
Kunc of Manufacturing Demonstration Facility at Oak
Ridge National Laboratory for helpful discussions related
to design issues with polymer additive manufacturing.
References
1. S. S. Crump: Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects, US Patent 5,121,329, 1992.
2. S. H. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy and P. K. Wright:
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling
ABS, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2002, 8, (4), 248257.
3. L. Li, Q. Sun, C. Bellehumeur, and P. Gu: Composite modeling
and analysis for fabrication of FDM prototypes with
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2015
VOL
31
NO
903