Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
David Publishing
Publication Information:
Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering is published bimonthly in hard copy (ISSN 2328-2193) by David Publishing
Company located at 616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-4876 Valley Cottage, NY 10989, USA.
Aims and Scope:
Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering, a monthly professional academic journal. Its aim is to achieve the advancement
and dissemination of information in the fields of geology, geotechnics, geological engineering, geological resource and so on. And
articles interpreting successful policies, programs or cases are also welcome.
Editorial Board Members:
Prof. Barbara, Maria Namysowska-Wilczyska (Poland), Prof. Atac Bascetin (Turkey), Prof. Basuony M. El-Garhy (KSA), Dr.
Eduardo Antonio Gomes Marques (Brazil), Dr. Ji Whan Ahn (Korea), Dr. Emoke Maria Imre (Hungary), Prof. Mohamed Ismail
Ibrahim (Egypt), Dr. Giovanna Vessia (Italy), Prof. Lus Carlos Loures (Portugal), Prof. Kanaan Hussein Moussa (Lebanon), Dr.
Joshua Ramogi Omer (UK), Prof. Andrea Brogi (Italy), Prof. Yousef Habous Nazzal (UAE), Prof. Vlado Gicev (Macedonia), Dr.
Behshad Jodeiri Shokri (Iran), Dr. A. K. M. Khorshed Alam (Bangladesh), Prof. Lee W. Clapp (USA), Prof. Hongfei Cheng (China),
Prof. Mossbah M. Kolkas (USA), Dr. Xiaowei Pan (South Africa), Dr. Debdas Ray (India), Dr. Che Abd Rahim Bin Mohamed
(Malaysia), Dr. Taoufik Ait-Ettajer (USA), Prof. Vijayan Gurumurthy Iyer (India), Dr. Gianluca Groppelli (Italy)
Manuscripts and correspondence are invited for publication. You can submit your papers via web submission, or E-mail to
geology@davidpublishing.com or geology_davidpublishing@hotmail.com. Submission guidelines and web submission system are
available at http://www.davidpublisher.com.
Editorial Office:
616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-4876 Valley Cottage, NY 10989, USA
Tel: 1-323-984-7526, 323-410-1082, 607-4416220; Fax: 1-323-984-7374, 323-908-0457
E-mail: geology@davidpublishing.com, geology_davidpublishing@hotmail.com
Copyright2016 by David Publishing Company and individual contributors. All rights reserved. David Publishing Company holds
the exclusive copyright of all the contents of this journal. In accordance with the international convention, no part of this journal
may be reproduced or transmitted by any media or publishing organs (including various websites) without the written permission
of the copyright holder. Otherwise, any conduct would be considered as the violation of the copyright. The contents of this journal
are available for any citation. However, all the citations should be clearly indicated with the title of this journal, serial number and
the name of the author.
Abstracted / Indexed in:
Chinese Database of CEPS, CNKI, China
Chinese Scientific Journals Database, VIP Corporation, Chongqing, China
CiteFactor (USA), Ulrichs International Periodicals Directory, USA
Google Scholar
InfoBase Index
CrossRef
Summon Serials Solutions
Pubicon Science Index
SJournal Index
Subscription Information:
Price (per year): Print $520; Online $360; Print and Online $680
David Publishing Company
616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-4876 Valley Cottage, NY 10989, USA
Tel: 1-323-984-7526, 323-410-1082, 607-4416220; Fax: 1-323-984-7374, 323-908-0457
E-mail: order@davidpublishing.com
DAVID PUBLISHING
Journal of
Contents
Techniques and Methods
251
257
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
Ayad Ali Faris Beg, Ahmed H. Al-Sulttani, Adrian Ochtyra, Anna Jarociska and Adriana
Marcinkowska
271
Theoretical Research
283
Petrological and Geochemical Constraints on the Evolution of El-Kahfa Alkaline Ring Complex,
South Eastern Desert, Egypt
A. M. Bishady, A. M. El-Sherif and M. E. Darwish
DAVID
PUBLISHING
1. Introduction
When Rankine or Coulomb theories are used to
design a retaining wall, it is accepted beforehand that
the retaining wall will experience a lateral
displacement. By allowing the wall to move laterally,
the earth pressure decreases on the active side of the
wall and earth pressure increases on the passive side,
and therefore more economical walls can be obtained
when the lateral displacement is allowed. This lateral
displacement is usually not calculated when designing
a retaining wall. This article describes a method that
estimates the lateral displacement of retaining walls.
QE = REH / DF
(2)
where, QE is soil-wall contact pressure on the passive
side wall and DF is the depth of the retaining wall
foundation.
h M hi hi x
(3)
i 1
Fig. 1
252
Fig. 2
h QE IFH
I FH
3
3 C1
sen 0 sen 0
2
3
1 2 ) sen (1 2 ) cos 1 2
sen 3'0
3 C2
sen '0
2
3
L
1 D F
1 D F
0 tan 1
; 1 tan 2 x ; 2 tan
2x
2 x
L
'0 tan 1
2
2
2 D F x
3 D
D
'1 tan 1 F ; '2 tan 1 F
2x
2 x
4. Example
4.1 Problem Statement
For the retaining wall shown in Fig. 4, calculate:
(1) Lateral displacement at the center of the wall;
(2) Lateral displacement at the edge of the wall;
(3) Lateral displacement at the center of the wall for
the passive earth thrust;
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
253
0.50
0.45
C1
C2
C1, C2
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
Poissons ratio
Fig. 3 Coefficients C1 and C2 as functions of the Poissons ratio.
Ea
Fig. 4
(8)
H
H
W m q
2
tan
(9)
254
U k H2
(10)
Ep
W tan ( )
sen tan ( ) cos
hc
hi 0.90 cm
i 1
Wi
(kN/m)
405.379
390.848
376.681
362.856
349.353
336.152
323.237
ki
(kN/m3)
1.657
1.578
1.496
1.446
1.367
1.301
1.266
Ui
(kN/m)
70.021
66.658
63.207
61.100
57.753
54.957
53.468
Eai
(kN/m)
160.289
160.840
160.987
161.591
161.127
160.668
160.678
(11)
Wi
(kN/m)
49.102
46.202
43.598
41.245
39.108
37.156
35.366
Epi
(kN/m)
92.790
91.898
91.401
91.279
91.522
92.129
93.113
255
Table 3
Section
Xi (m)
0 (rad.)
1 (rad.)
2 (rad.)
0' (rad.)
1' (rad.)
2' (rad.)
IFH
hi (kN/m2)
hi (cm)
Table 4
1
1.2000
1.4514
0.4636
-0.4636
1.4027
0.9828
0.4636
2.8269E-01
2.5766
0.3710
2
3.6000
1.2252
0.1651
-0.1651
1.2081
0.4636
0.1651
1.3759E-01
1.2541
0.1806
3
6.0000
1.0304
0.0997
-0.0997
1.0217
0.2915
0.0997
8.5547E-02
0.7797
0.1123
4
8.4000
0.8721
0.0713
-0.0713
0.8672
0.2111
0.0713
5.9235E-02
0.5399
0.0777
5
10.8000
0.7470
0.0555
-0.0555
0.7439
0.1651
0.0555
4.3334E-02
0.3950
0.0569
6
13.2000
0.6483
0.0454
-0.0454
0.6464
0.1355
0.0454
3.2852E-02
0.2994
0.0431
7
15.6000
0.5700
0.0384
-0.0384
0.5687
0.1149
0.0384
2.5598E-02
0.2333
0.0336
8
18.0000
0.5071
0.0333
-0.0333
0.5062
0.0997
0.0333
2.0405E-02
0.1860
0.0268
6
13.200
0.9874
0.0454
-0.0454
0.9855
0.1355
0.0454
3.9711E-02
0.3619
0.0521
7
15.600
0.9084
0.0384
-0.0384
0.9069
0.1149
0.0384
3.2854E-02
0.2994
0.0431
8
18.000
0.8380
0.0333
-0.0333
0.8369
0.0997
0.0333
2.7663E-02
0.2521
0.0363
Section
xi (m)
0 (rad.)
1 (rad.)
2 (rad.)
0' (rad.)
1' (rad.)
2' (rad.)
IFH
hi (kN/m2)
hi (cm)
1
1.200
1.5109
0.4636
-0.4636
1.4861
0.9828
0.4636
2.8272E-01
2.5769
0.3711
2
3.600
1.3927
0.1651
-0.1651
1.3833
0.4636
0.1651
1.3830E-01
1.2605
0.1815
3
6.000
1.2793
0.0997
-0.0997
1.2739
0.2915
0.0997
8.7932E-02
0.8015
0.1154
4
8.400
1.1732
0.0713
-0.0713
1.1695
0.2111
0.0713
6.3580E-02
0.5795
0.0834
hi 0.95 cm
i 1
5
10.800
1.0757
0.0555
-0.0555
1.0731
0.1651
0.0555
4.9245E-02
0.4488
0.0646
hcp hc
E PH
R EH
(13)
hop ho
E PH
R EH
(14)
256
the
example
discussed,
the
References
[1]
[2]
5. Conclusions
It is discussed a procedure for estimating the lateral
displacement of a retaining wall, which is an aid to
determine the dimensions B an b (Fig. 4) and depth of
foundation for wall design.
When a retaining wall is designed, if the project
permits, it is very convenient to design the wall so that
[3]
[4]
DAVID
PUBLISHING
1. Introduction
With growing attention to climate elements and
climatic changes and their effects on the environment
and ecological systems, the interesting of
evapotranspiration estimation is increased as well,
especially with the emergence of various measuring
techniques for assessment of climate elements.
Recently, the remote sensing becomes one of the
valuable data sources and analysis technique for
implementing such studies. Accurate estimation of
Corresponding author: Ayad Ali Faris Beg, Ph.D., Asst.
Prof., research fields: hydrogeology, remote sensing and GIS.
258
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
Estimation of Evapotranspir
E
ration Using SEBAL
S
Algorrithm and Lan
ndsat-8 Data
A Case Stu
udy:
Tatra Mountains Region
R
Fig. 1
2599
3. Method
d of Analysiis
Spatial vaariation of ET
E depends on
o land use//land
cover in anyy area. To esttimate ET vallues several solar
s
radiation paarameters neeed to be calcuulated. The main
m
source of data is reprresented by Landsat-8 data
OLI/TIRS with Path 188/Row 26, acquired on
08-SEP-2013, and one arc-second
a
reesolution AST
TER
GDEM witth some refference weaather parameeters
nearby the arrea are used. Land use/landd cover classees in
stud
dy area are classified using SAM (sp
pectral anglee
map
pper) classifiication methood with specctral angle off
0.3 using ENVI v.5.3 softwarre.
To
T calculate the ET usinng SEBAL method, thee
requ
uired matheematical equuations for building
b
thee
algo
orithms of processing
p
aand analysis models aree
colllected. Sixteeen spatial anaalysis models are preparedd
usin
ng ERDAS imagine sooftware i.e. atmosphericc
corrrection moddels for calcculating the reflectance,,
surfface albedo, emissivity, surface temp
perature, andd
elem
ments of sollar radiations balance, in
ncluding nett
radiiations, soil heat
h flux, sensible heat flu
ux, latent heatt
flux
x, and finally calculating thhe instantaneo
ous and dailyy
evaapotranspiratioon values.
3.1 Atmosphericc Correction oof Landsat-8 Data
D
Atmospheric
A
correction for solar radiations
r
iss
imp
portant in reemote sensing analysis; its necessityy
dep
pends on the objectives off the analysiss. In general,,
land
d cover idenntification exeercises that are
a based onn
sing
gle-date imaages do noot require atmosphericc
corrrection, as pixels
p
are beiing compared with otherr
pixeels within an image in term
ms of similarity [18].
Estimation
E
off the groundd target refleectance startss
with
h convertingg the pixel value to raadiance [18]..
Acccordingly, Laandsat-8 OLII/TIRS bandss data can bee
con
nverted to TO
OA spectral raadiance using
g the radiancee
260
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
in radians
2
)
365
(4)
Where
sw 0.75 2 10 5 z
ESUN
ESUN
(6)
Table 1
S
S
(7)
(10)
Tb
(9)
2
sw
( TOA pathradiance )
K2
K
ln( 1 1)
L
(11)
Kelvin,
is spectral radiance
in
W .m .ster .m , and is calculated by the following
equation [27]:
1
Band
TOA-ESUN
2
2,067
3
1,893
4
1,603
5
972.6
6
245.0
7
79.72
9
399.7
261
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
L 0.0370588 DN 3.2
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
SAVI
(1 L) (TIR Re d )
( L TIR Re d )
(16)
Tb
Ts
1 ( Tb / ) ln
(18)
h c / a (0.01438 m.K)
(19)
34
J .s )
c velocity of light(2.998 108 m / s)
Rn G H ET
(20)
2
Rn (1 ) Rs RL RL (1 ) RL (21)
Where RS incoming shortwave radiation (Watt/m2),
is the broadband surface albedo (dimensionless),
RL is the incoming longwave radiation (Watt/m2),
RL is the outgoing longwave radiation (Watt/m2) and
is the surface emissivity (dimensionless).
is
Rs GSc cos d r sw
(22)
262
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
90 , where = sun
RL Ts4
(23)
RL a Ta4
Where Ta =Ts for selected cold pixel in K,
(25)
is air
a 0.85 ( ln sw ) 0.09
(26)
G / Rn
Ts
(27)
First the ratio of G/Rn is computed and checked for
the condition of NDVI < 0; then the ratio of G/Rn will
be assigned equal to 0.5. The result image will be
converted to soil heat flux (G) in W/m2 by multiplying
the ratio G/Rn by Rn by using ERDAS modeler [25].
Sensible Heat Flux (H) is the rate of heat loss to the
air by convection and conduction, due to temperature
gradients [32, 33].
H C p dT / rah
(28)
z2
)
z1
rah
u k
ln(
(29)
u k u x ln(z x / z om )
(30)
z om 0.018 LAI
(31)
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
C p u 3 Ts
kgH
(32)
* ET Rn G H
ETinst
* ET
3600
(33)
(34)
263
measuring
of
descriptive
statistic
(36)
(37)
24
ETr 24 ETr h
(38)
264
Fig. 2
Estimation of Evapotranspir
E
ration Using SEBAL
S
Algorrithm and Lan
ndsat-8 Data
A Case Stu
udy:
Tatra Mountains Region
R
Calcu
ulations of solaar radiation paarameters and evapotranspirration from Laandsat-8.
Estimation of Evapotranspir
E
ration Using SEBAL
S
Algorrithm and Lan
ndsat-8 Data
A Case Stu
udy:
Tatra Mountains Region
R
Fig. 4
2655
266
Fig. 4
Estimation of Evapotranspir
E
ration Using SEBAL
S
Algorrithm and Lan
ndsat-8 Data
A Case Stu
udy:
Tatra Mountains Region
R
Contiinued.
Table 2
Statistics of emissivity, albedo, NDVI, LAI and surface temperature (oC) for different land use/land cover in Tatra region.
S-Albedo
Class name
ID
Rock outcrops
Grass land with field of
vegetation
Forests
Bare lands
Hills shadows
Water bodies
Built-up mixed with rocky
area
LAI
ID
Min
Max
1
-0.304
2.654
2
-0.304
4.177
3
-0.304
3.187
4
-0.133
1.995
5
-0.304
1.112
6
-0.304
0.002
7
-0.304
3.539
8.0
Area
(km2)
102.0
34.9
3
4
5
6
NDVI
Min
Max
Range
Mean
Std
Min
Max
Range
Mean
Std
0.038
0.48
0.44
0.17
0.05
-0.056
0.537
0.593
0.203
0.092
446.8
0.033
0.44
0.40
0.13
0.03
-0.103
0.602
0.705
0.361
0.086
51.6
0.2
2.4
0.1
659.8
2.7
31.3
1.0
0.037
0.080
0.036
0.042
0.23
0.28
0.13
0.06
0.19
0.20
0.10
0.02
0.08
0.18
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.00
-0.061
0.063
-0.061
-0.062
0.567
0.483
0.370
0.108
0.628
0.420
0.431
0.171
0.279
0.204
0.051
-0.029
0.076
0.062
0.064
0.009
2.8
36.2
0.049
1.04
0.99
0.15
0.03
-0.052
0.582
0.634
0.281
0.096
Range
2.958
4.481
3.491
2.127
1.416
0.306
3.842
Mean
0.363
1.130
0.677
0.345
-0.149
-0.303
0.709
Std
0.363
0.481
0.367
0.260
0.181
0.015
0.465
Nb-emissivity
Min
Max
0.969
0.990
0.969
0.990
0.969
0.990
0.970
0.977
0.969
0.990
0.969
0.990
0.969
0.982
Range
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.007
0.021
0.021
0.013
Mean
0.971
0.974
0.972
0.971
0.975
0.981
0.972
Std
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.010
0.002
Surface temperature ()
Min
Max
Range
8.3
34.2
25.9
8.1
34.3
26.2
9.9
30.6
20.7
22.5
34.6
12.1
6.2
22.4
16.2
12.9
20.1
7.2
13.4
31.8
18.4
Mean
23.2
23.7
20.5
28.5
14.0
15.7
25.9
Std
3.8
3.3
1.8
2.2
3.0
1.4
1.2
Table 3
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Statistics of solar radiation elements and ET for different land use/land cover in Tatra region.
Net radiation
Min
Max
220.4
611.5
232.3
610.1
403.0
600.9
313.4
503.4
492.2
620.9
545.0
583.6
170.7
559.5
Latent heat flux
Min
Max
1.6
485.4
3.6
492.1
106.8
468.9
32.6
232.1
162.6
500.6
161.5
376.3
10.5
405.4
Range
391.1
377.8
197.9
190.0
128.7
38.6
388.8
Mean
446.1
473.8
526.2
416.4
581.4
569.4
450.9
Std
48.3
35.4
21.4
24.6
15.9
7.1
25.0
Range
483.9
488.5
362.0
199.5
338.1
214.8
394.9
Mean
207.2
222.9
296.8
129.7
350.1
200.4
181.4
Std
72.0
60.1
35.9
37.1
77.5
19.6
25.7
Mean
110.7
119.4
116.1
128.1
154.8
282.8
125.7
Std
15.6
12.4
7.3
5.5
92.9
18.8
7.8
Mean
0.298
0.321
0.427
0.187
0.504
0.288
0.261
Std
0.104
0.087
0.052
0.053
0.111
0.028
0.037
Range
145.9
147.4
116.8
68.5
91.2
40.7
103.8
Mean
128.2
131.5
113.3
158.5
76.5
86.2
143.7
Std
21.5
18.4
10.4
12.2
17.1
7.9
7.0
Range
16.72
16.88
12.51
6.89
11.68
7.42
14.00
Mean
7.16
7.70
10.25
4.48
12.09
6.92
6.27
Std
2.49
2.08
1.24
1.28
2.68
0.68
0.88
269
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
Range Plot of MEAN , MAX , MIN
MEAN
MEAN
0.8
18
0.7
16
14
0.6
12
0.5
Et-24(mm/day)
ET Instant.(mm/hr)
0.4
0.3
0.2
10
8
6
4
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-2
1
Fig. 6 Plots of min., max., mean values of ET for land use/land cover in Tatra region.
5. Conclusions
Estimated
results
of
hourly
and
daily
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to University of Warsaw, Faculty of
Geography and Regional Studies for their support in
supplying research requirements. Thank you for the
staff of Department of Geoinformatics Cartography
and Remote Sensing for completion field validation for
land use/land cover data.
[6]
[7]
References
[1]
[8]
270
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL Algorithm and Landsat-8 DataA Case Study:
Tatra Mountains Region
Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Remote Sensing
Data: From Empirical to Numerical Modeling
Approaches. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 19:
223-49.
Bastiaanssen, W., Pelgrum, H., Wang, J., Ma, Y., Moreno,
J., Roerink, G., and Van der Wal, T. 1998. A Remote
Sensing Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land
(SEBAL): Part 2: Validation. Journal of Hydrology 212:
213-29.
Tasumi, M., Trezza, R., Allen, R. G., and Wright, J. L.
2003. US Validation Tests on the SEBAL Model for
Evapotranspiration via Satellite. In Proceedings of 54th
IEC Meeting of the International Commission on
Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) Workshop Remote
Sensing of ET for Large Regions.
Bastiaanssen, W., Noordman, E., Pelgrum, H., Davids, G.,
Thoreson, B., and Allen, R. 2005. SEBAL Model with
Remotely Sensed Data to Improve Water-Resources
Management under Actual Field Conditions. Journal of
Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131: 85-93.
Ruhoff, A. L., Paz, A. R., Collischonn, W., Aragao, L. E.,
Rocha, H. R., and Malhi, Y. S. 2012. A MODIS-Based
Energy Balance to Estimate Evapotranspiration for
Clear-Sky Days in Brazilian Tropical Savannas. Remote
Sensing 4: 703-25.
Mirek, Z., and Gowaciski, Z. 1996. Przyroda
Tatrzaskiego Parku Narodowego. wsppr. Polska
Akademia Nauk. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera.
Guzik, M., and Skawiski, P. 2009. Applying
Geomathics to Determination of Landscape Altitudinal
Zones in the Mountains. Landform Analysis 11: 25-32.
Birkenmajer, K. 2012. Geology of the Lower Subtatric
Nappe, Kopy Sotysie Area, Eastern Tatra Mts (West
Carpathians, Poland). Studia Geologica Polonica 135:
55-116.
Ksiazkiewicz, M. 1956. Geology of the Northern
Carpathians. Geologische Rundschau 45: 369-411.
Mirek, Z., and Piekos-Mirkowa, H. 1992. Flora and
Vegetation of the Polish Tatra Mountains. Mountain
Research and Development: 147-73.
Mather, P., and Tso, B. 2009. Classification Methods for
Remotely Sensed Data. CRC press.
EROS, LANDSAT_8- Path: 188 Row: 26 for Scene:
LC81880262013251LGN00,
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:
Remote-Sensing
Image, in, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA 2013.
Chander, G., and Markham, B. 2003. Revised Landsat-5
TM
Radiometric
Calibration
Procedures
and
Postcalibration Dynamic Ranges. Geoscience and
Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions 41: 2674-7.
DAVID
PUBLISHING
1. Introduction
On January 15, 2014, landslides on the slopes of the
hills along the Tondano River initiated the dammed
flow of the river. On the same day, the natural levee
collapsed leading to a destructive flash flood. As the
result, 32 people were confirmed dead, 2 were missing,
and 40,000 were evacuated [1].
Prior to the landslides and flash floods on January 15,
2014, an earthquake of 4.1 mb in magnitude occurred
in Manado (Table 1). The earthquake has disrupted the
stability of the soil and rocks. While the increased rain
intensity a week before the disaster (Table 2) had
triggered landslides in the area outside the outlet of
Lake Tondano that filled up the river channels and
slowed down the flow of water to downstream areas.
High intensity rain upon the occurrence of disaster in
almost all regions of the Manado Province, particularly
the runoff flowing into the Tondano Lake, resulted to
an over discharge of water to the outlets due to the
shrinkage of the lakes surface area as the impact of
Corresponding author: Muchtar S. Solle, Dr., research
fields: landslide and land degradation.
272
Table 1
Time
Latitude
2014-01-30T20:06:04.940Z 0.4023
Longitude
125.5347
Depth
90.16
Mag
4.5
2014-01-25T05:41:35.960Z 2.0018
124.6186
239.41
4.5
2014-01-17T06:14:49.370Z 2.542
2014-01-03T05:12:54.040Z 1.3488
125.8191
125.8906
116.97
64.3
4
4.1
Type
Earthquake
Earthquake
Earthquake
Earthquake
Date
Station
1/1/2014
2/1/2014
3/1/2014
4/1/2014
5/1/2014
6/1/2014
7/1/2014
8/1/2014
9/1/2014
10/1/2014
11/1/2014
12/1/2014
13/1/2014
14/2/2014
15/1/2015
16/3/2014
17/1/2016
18/4/2014
19/1/2017
20/4/2015
21/1/2018
22/4/2016
23/1/2019
24/4/2017
25/1/2020
26/4/2018
27/4/2019
28/4/2020
29/4/2021
30/4/2022
Bitung
Rainfall
mm
2.2
13.5
6.2
0
0
13.4
28.8
12.9
0.5
2.6
10.9
0
73.3
41.2
0.2
0.7
2.5
3.2
0
7.7
10.9
15.4
0
0
Station
Kayuwatu
Rainfall
mm
1
0
1.5
0.6
0.6
65.4
54.2
67.9
6.3
40.3
4.5
39
87.2
133.8
46.7
4.5
2
15
18.8
12
32
31.6
Station
Samratulangi
0.5
0.1
Rainfall
mm
0.6
8.1
2.4
5.8
43.1
64
78.2
6.1
43.8
10.6
0.2
145
16.5
5.6
2.6
19.1
5.4
4.4
22.2
42.9
1.2
0.9
Description: Red indicated the increased rainfall intensity and Blue indicates the rainfall during the disaster (Source: BMKG, 2014).
2. Research Methods
The methods used in this study were the analyses of
273
4. Geomorphology
The development of geomorphology of Tondano
North Sulawesi is inseparable from the processes of
Resen
active tectonics and volcanic
and
Plio-Pleistocene ancient tectonics [12, 13]. Resen
climate activities with rainfall ranged from 2,000
mm/yr-> 4,000 mm/yr, also became an external factor
in shaping the current landform. Based on Desaunettes
classification [14], the geomorphology (landform) of
Tondano watershed can be divided into three, namely:
(1) Alluvial landform (A), (2) Volcanic landform (V),
274
5. Lithology
The lithology of Tondano watershed used in the
study of landslide referred to the Geological Sheet of
Manado [15]. In addition, the lithology constituent is
derived from five formations: (1) Alluvium Quarter
(Qa), (2) Lakes and Rivers Quarter (Qs), (3) Volcanic
Quarter (Qv), (4) Volcanic Tondano Quarter (Qvt) and
(5) Volcanic Miocene Tertiary Quarter (Tmv).
Qa (Alluvium Quarter): consists of boulders, gravels,
275
Fig. 7
The appearance of breccias (A) of the Tmv
formation, with the components of andesitic fragments (C).
(B): The appearance of the andesite lava unit of Tmv
formation (black arrow).
276
Fig. 8
Fig. 9 Vermiculite and Halloysite mineral content are higher than Kaolinite content, the potential of landslides increased
2-fold.
277
Fig. 10 Soil morphology with the source materials of incoherent pyroclastic material (A). There are two types of pyroclastic
material, e.g., andesitic (B) and basaltic (C).
6.2 Earthquake
278
Fig. 11
Seismicity map of North Sulawesi which affects the stability of the soil and rocks in Tondano watershed.
279
Fig. 12 The pattern of structural geology formed the fault in Tondano watershed. Accumulation of joint data in a rosette
diagram showed the main straightness direction of NW-SE as indicated by 1 pattern [24]. It is in line with the regional
tectonic map [12, 15].
280
Fig. 13 The condition of lithology that has endured increased shear stress and declined shear strength. (A) The area adjacent
to Tondano Lake, Eris district, (B) the area adjacent to Lokon Mountain, Tomohon, (C) Tinoor, (D) Eris district, (E) Air
Madidi, East Tondano district.
7. Conclusions
(1) The occurrence of an earthquake with a
magnitude of 4-4.5 mb in Bitung Manado and the
increased intensity of rainfall within week in prior to
[9]
[10]
[11]
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express their gratitude to
the Directorate of Higher Education (DIKTI) and
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
(LP2M) Hasanuddin University for the research grant,
thus, the entire activities of study could be
accomplished.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
281
282
http://www.bmkg.go.id/BMKG_Pusat/default.bmkg.
Accessed April 16, 2015.
[21] Siahaan, E. E., Soemarinda, S., Fauzi, A., Silitonga, T.,
Azimudin, T., and Raharjo, I. B. 2005. Tectonism and
Volcanism Study in the Minahasa Compartment of the
North Arm of Sulawesi Related to Lahendong Geothermal
Field, Indonesia. In Proceedings World Geothermal
Congress, 24-9.
[22] Calvert, S. J., and Hall, R. 2007. Cenozoic Evolution of
the Lariang and Karama Regions, Basin, Western
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal Petroleum Geosciences 13:
353-68.
[23] Hall, R. 2012. Late Jurassic-Cenozoic Reconstructions of
the Indonesian Region and the Indian Ocean. Journal
Tectonophysics 570-571: 1-41.
[24] Davis, G. H., and Reynolds, S. J. 1996. Structural
Geology of Rocks and Regions. 2nd edition. New York:
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 776.
[25] Priyono,
Kuswaji,
Dwi.
2008.
Analisismorfometridanmorfostrukturlerengkejadianlong
sor di Kecamatan Banjarmangu Kabupaten Banjarnegara.
Forum Geografi 22 (1): 53-69.
DAVID
PUBLISHING
1. Introduction
Hunting Geology and Geophysics [1] introduced for
the first time El-Kahfa as a ring complex. It is located
at the intersection of Lat. 24818 N and Long.
343855 E, with its peak rising 1,018 m above sea
level.
Lockwood [2] surveyed a segment of Egypt
including
El-Kahfa
area
magnetically
and
radiometrically and revealed a radioactive anomaly
that attains an amplitude of 200 cps.
El-Ramly et al. [3, 4] and El-Ramly and Hussein [5,
6] gave some details about the geology and
petrography of El-Kahfa ring complex. They grouped
the Egyptian ring complexes into five groups on the
basis of their magmatic differentiation and the degree
professor,
284
Fig. 1 Key map showing the distribution of the main ring complexes in the South Eastern Desert, Egypt (after El-Ramly [7]).
composition
locates
between
the
inner ring and a central stock (Figs. 2 and 3a). The ring
ridge is not complete and open to the south in the form
of a horse shoe ridge. Near its entrance there is a central
stock which rises for about 180 m above the level of the
ring wadi.
El-Kahfa country rocks encounter various rock types.
The epidiorites surrounded the outer ring. The contact
between these epidiorite rocks and the syenites
encloses gray rhyodacite xenoliths embedded in
generally homogenous syenitic matrix (Fig. 3b).
Metavolcanics are fine-grained, hard and compact
basic, intermediate and acidic varieties, exhibiting
various colours. They are dissected by some trachytic
dykes.
The outer ring is composed of alkaline syenites,
which gradually vary from leucocratic syenites barren
of quartz to quartz enriched syenites. These rocks are
associated and invaded by numerous trachytes.
The inner ring seems to possess a complicated
structure and its rocks vary in composition from
leucocratic to melanocratic syenite varieties. In
equigranular alkaline syenites with quartz and a
relatively high percent of dark minerals form its
western and northern parts. The inner contacts are
covered by wadi alluvium, but highly cataclased and
ferruginated rocks are developed at the very foot of its
slope.
The central stock is formed essentially of
alkali-gabbros. Relics of volcanic cones represented by
alkali basalts and their pyroclastic equivalents are
preserved in the eastern part of the stock. The
alkali-gabbros are cut by small bodies of alkaline
syenites, which may occasionally grade into nepheline
syenites.
3. Petrography
2. Geologic Setting
285
286
Fig. 2
Geological map of El-Kahfa ring complex, South Eastern Desert, Egypt (modified after El-Ramly et al. [3]).
acidic varieties.
The groundmass is commonly very fine-grained and
mostly trachytic (Fig. 4a). The metabasalts
groundmass is formed of devitrified glass and
spheriolitic feldspar aggregates with doloritic and
apodoloritic textures. Amphiboles and biotite
predominate among the mafic constituents. In the more
basic varieties the groundmass is turbid feldspathic
with fine laths of colorless to greenish clinopyroxene,
287
Fig. 3 Photograph of: (a) Panoramic view showing the relation between the inner (I), outer (O) rings and the central stock (C)
of El-Kahfa ring complex; (b) Dark gray rhyodacite xenolith embedded in syenitic matrix.
288
Fig. 4 Photomicrograph of: (a) Metavolcanic showing very fine-grained doleritic groundmass; (b) Epidiorite thin section
showing hornblende after pyroxene (sheller texture); (c) Phenocryst of zoned plagioclase in a trachytic groundmass in the
porphyritic texture; (d) Trachytic texture in the ring complex trachytes; (e) Aegirine altered to arvedsonite amphibole and
aenigmatite surrounded by perthitic feldspars; (f) Syenodiorites showing hornblende altered to chlorite and scarce carbonates.
289
290
4. Geochemistry
Total seventeen representative samples from
El-Kahfa ring complex and its country rocks were
analyzed for major elements (Table 1) at NMA
(Nuclear Materials Authority) laboratories, using
conventional wet chemical techniques of Shapiro and
Brannock [27] with some modifications given by
El-Reedy [28]. Ten representative samples of the
syenites and associated trachytes were investigated for
their trace elements and REE at ACME analytical
laboratories, Vancouver, Canada, using the ICP-Ms
techniques (Table 2).
4.1 Major and Trace Elements
The distribution of the major oxides and the trace
elements of El-Kahfa ring complex (Tables 1 and 2)
indicates that El-Kahfa rocks are represented by
undersaturated alkaline varieties. It can steadily report
that, the silica content in El-Kahfa complex exhibit a
distinct gap separating the undersaturated alkali-basalts
(47.88%) and alkali gabbros (49.16%) from the alkali
trachytes (57.91%) and alkali syenites (64.44%).
Bryan [29] and Wilkinson [25] have pointed out that
silica-gaps are characteristic of differentiated
intrusions, which provide some of the best evidence for
fractional crystallization.
291
Table 1 Chemical analyses of major oxides (wt.%) and computerized CIPW-normative minerals for El-Kahfa ring
complexes samples.
Rock type
S. No.
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
FeO
FeO*
Fe2O3*
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
L.O.I
Total
Alk. Basalt
K14
47.88
1.32
15.34
1.82
8.02
11.46
12.73
0.12
4.01
14.00
2.97
0.31
0.24
0.16
96.19
Alk. Gabbro
K11
49.16
2.22
17.43
7.26
7.19
13.72
15.25
0.16
2.82
9.23
2.02
1.15
0.37
0.61
99.62
Mg#
Q
C
Or
Ab
An
Ne
Lc
Ac
Ns
Di
Wo
En
Fs
Hy
HyEn
HyFs
Ol
OlFo
OlFa
Mt
Hm
Il
Ap
47.13
0.00
0.00
1.87
23.88
28.12
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.11
17.24
8.59
8.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
1.14
1.21
5.65
0.00
2.56
0.53
41.15
10.16
0.00
0.87
17.24
35.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.12
3.67
2.24
1.21
7.51
4.88
2.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.63
0.00
4.26
0.82
Epidiorite
K1
K10
60.63
66.22
0.96
0.40
15.52
12.96
1.92
1.50
4.71
2.30
6.44
3.65
7.15
4.06
0.12
0.06
3.02
0.32
7.89
1.56
2.15
7.65
0.63
2.41
0.21
0.04
0.30
1.11
98.14
96.52
CIPW-normative values
13.15
19.88
24.33
43.41
0.00
0.00
3.81
14.67
18.59
0.00
31.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.46
0.00
14.32
5.98
11.54
3.05
5.71
1.67
2.06
1.26
3.78
10.61
0.00
6.05
0.00
4.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.87
0.78
0.47
0.09
K13a
69.41
0.51
19.56
0.73
1.63
2.29
2.54
0.10
0.32
1.56
2.46
1.19
0.60
0.48
98.55
Trachytes
K13b
63.18
0.24
15.40
2.58
2.81
5.13
5.70
0.09
1.02
2.80
6.52
3.18
0.04
0.46
97.86
K3
61.26
0.36
19.07
2.96
3.12
5.78
6.43
0.15
1.60
2.68
4.03
2.02
0.20
0.84
98.29
K7
57.91
0.73
18.59
3.04
4.25
6.99
7.76
0.12
0.40
2.57
4.97
3.79
0.50
1.03
97.90
25.93
48.41
12.92
7.18
21.20
4.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.58
0.82
1.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.08
0.00
0.99
1.34
39.29
6.84
0.00
19.22
56.30
3.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.75
4.40
2.09
2.25
1.07
0.51
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.79
0.00
0.54
0.09
47.76
21.69
5.95
12.26
34.95
12.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.15
4.10
3.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.70
0.45
14.37
7.99
2.78
23.14
43.36
10.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.47
1.03
4.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.55
0.00
1.43
1.13
292
(Table 1 to be continued)
Rock type
S. No.
K15
SiO2
63.81
TiO2
0.41
Al2O3
14.51
Fe2O3
3.02
FeO
2.06
FeO*
4.78
Fe2O3*
5.31
MnO
0.15
MgO
1.10
CaO
2.80
Na2O
7.20
K2O
3.35
P2O5
0.03
L.O.I
0.15
Total
98.59
K30
60.68
0.80
16.40
4.08
2.52
6.10
6.88
0.13
1.90
2.80
7.20
1.86
0.18
0.09
98.64
Mg#
Q
C
Or
Ab
An
Ne
Lc
Ac
Ns
Di
Wo
En
Fs
Hy
HyEn
HyFs
Ol
OlFo
OlFa
Mt
Hm
Il
Ap
57.34
4.62
0.00
11.16
61.75
7.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.69
2.51
2.11
0.08
2.81
2.71
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
0.00
1.54
0.40
48.77
35.02
0.00
20.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.86
12.05
11.60
5.82
2.60
3.19
0.44
0.20
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79
0.07
Syenite
K30a
61.35
0.48
15.00
3.88
3.40
6.89
7.66
0.12
2.02
2.80
7.20
2.41
0.23
0.09
98.98
51.44
3.17
0.00
14.41
61.53
1.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.05
4.67
2.94
1.44
3.22
2.16
1.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.69
0.00
0.92
0.51
K5
K9
60.20
60.80
0.44
0.40
11.31
16.80
3.72
4.82
3.62
3.81
6.97
8.15
7.74
9.05
0.11
0.15
3.02
0.83
4.20
2.24
6.97
6.74
4.69
3.10
0.10
0.08
0.42
0.12
98.80
99.77
CIPW-normative values
59.8
28.46
19.95
3.65
0.00
0.00
28.20
18.17
0.00
57.08
0.00
6.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.92
0.00
11.06
0.00
16.90
3.55
8.59
1.78
4.59
0.79
3.72
0.98
5.58
2.99
3.08
1.34
2.50
1.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.76
0.22
0.18
Syenodiorites
K1a
K25
62.05
59.76
0.31
0.80
16.32
17.05
1.16
3.08
4.59
3.51
5.63
6.28
6.26
6.98
0.23
0.08
6.07
3.18
3.36
6.56
3.65
2.04
1.33
0.84
0.20
0.60
0.64
0.39
96.23
97.89
Alkaline syenite
K26
K32
65.46
64.44
0.02
0.19
17.92
16.98
0.73
1.65
1.61
3.19
2.27
4.67
2.52
5.19
0.08
0.05
1.20
1.40
2.84
2.40
1.46
2.31
1.26
2.06
0.05
0.18
0.84
0.12
93.47
94.97
70.22
16.74
3.21
7.92
31.08
15.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.71
15.29
7.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.59
0.44
57.06
46.72
9.81
8.05
13.32
14.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.90
3.24
2.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.14
0.00
0.04
0.12
61.76
26.82
2.18
5.10
17.68
29.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.95
8.15
2.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.58
0.00
1.56
1.34
43.90
36.28
7.34
12.85
20.58
11.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.19
3.69
4.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.52
0.00
0.38
0.41
salic magma.
MacDonald [31] mentioned that these gaps may
reflect the following:
(1) Some sort of physical control in which rise to the
surface is prevented by high viscosity and/or density
[32, 33].
293
Rock type
Epidio.
Alk. Gab.
Trachyte
S. No.
K1
K11
K13a
K7
K3
Ba
Rb
Sr
Y
Zr
Nb
Th
Pb
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
V
Hf
Cs
Ta
Co
Be
U
W
Sn
Mo
Au
Th/U
Zr/Nb
Sr/Rb
240.00
32.80
401.60
25.40
195.30
6.60
3.80
3.10
18.30
56.00
51.10
24.30
156.00
5.60
0.80
1.30
19.70
1.00
3.80
3.20
2.00
0.60
0.30
1
29.60
12.24
52.00
4.60
209.70
25.60
48.10
2.40
0.30
0.80
17.90
47.00
28.00
5.00
404.00
1.60
0.20
13.00
32.50
0.80
0.90
1.20
0.70
0.20
0.30
0.33
20.04
45.59
342.00
59.20
36.60
66.90
1,144.4
213.40
22.60
11.60
31.9
24.00
7.10
1.50
19.00
27.30
0.20
15.69
0.60
4.00
8.00
6.80
8.00
3.70
0.80
2.83
5.36
0.62
153.00
179.00
46.50
123.80
2,128.7
383..3
42.90
22.30
41.90
105.00
2.20
1.90
8.00
47.70
0.50
21.10
1.70
11.00
10.90
2.30
17.00
1.20
3.00
3.94
5.55
0.26
4.26
111.60
20.60
128.70
1,342.40
37.10
30.50
6.40
37.40
48.00
0.80
0.80
7.50
34.00
1.00
19.40
0.40
8.00
9.50
3.70
15.00
0.80
0.60
3.21
36.18
0.18
k26a
Alk.
155.0
133.10
15.10
55.30
1,543.60
170.70
16.40
4.30
45.50
13.00
1.60
14.00
6.00
33.30
0.50
14.50
0.90
8.00
7.60
4.70
8.00
1.20
3.0
2.16
9.04
0.11
Syenite
K32a
Alk.
228.00
47.80
37.10
14.50
230.80
26.60
3.40
2.00
47.40
28.00
1.20
1.300
6.00
6.60
0.20
4.10
11.00
4.00
3.60
2.20
3.00
1.30
0.80
0.95
8.68
0.78
Syenodiorite
K9
K1a
K25
466.00
82.70
25.20
44.70
597.00
120.00
11.80
4.90
32.30
21.00
2.20
0.70
7.00
14.20
0.40
10.60
2.20
4.00
5.00
3.30
4.00
2.50
n.d.
2.36
4.98
0.30
91.00
15.70
26.10
74.20
868.00
174.20
16.30
4.70
38.20
28.00
11.20
3.40
17.00
21.40
0.10
10.50
1.30
5.00
5.40
4.00
7.00
1.10
3.70
3.02
4.98
1.66
115.00
73.50
417.08
44.90
712.00
134.70
12.80
2.40
28.70
64.00
9.90
0.80
7.00
16.30
5.30
9.01
4.70
4.00
7.00
3.00
5.00
4.30
n.d.
1.83
5.29
5.67
294
Fig. 5
(a) TAS diagram of Le Maitre [20]; (b) QAP diagram of Strekeisen [39].
295
Fig. 6 Harker type diagrams between SiO2 and (a) MgO; (b) CaO; (c) Total iron as Fe2O3; (d) TiO2; (e) Ni.
The plotted trends are visual estimates. Symbols as in Fig. 4.
296
Fig. 7 (a) AFM diagram (Wager and Deer [46] and Irvine and Baragar [42]); (b) SiO2total alkalis diagram of Irvine and
Baragar [42]; (c) SiO2-Al2O3-(Na2O+K2O) diagram (Bailey and MacDonald [44]); (d) Spider diagram of trace elements.
Symbols as in Fig. 4.
297
basalts.
The within-plate tectonic setting of the syenites and
trachytes are confirmed on the Nb-Y diagram (Fig. 8d)
of Pearce et al. [59], while the alkali-gabbro and
epidiorite are related to volcanic arc granites and the
syn-collision granites.
4.2 REEs (Rare Earth Elements)
On the primitive-mantle normalized REE pattern
Fig. 8 (a) Zr-Nb variation diagram. The plotted trend is visual estimate; (b) Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2*0.0001 classification diagram of
Winchester and Floyd [57]); (c) Hf/3-Th-Ta diagram of Wood [58]; (d) Nb-Y variation diagram of Pearce et al. [59]; (e)
Primitive mantle normalized REE pattern. Symbols as in Fig. 4.
298
Table 3
Rock type
Epidiorite
Alk. gabbro
S. No.
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
REE
K1
15.80
38.20
5.35
24.40
5.37
1.30
5.07
0.86
4.67
0.91
2.58
0.40
2.42
0.36
107.69
K11
2.70
8.40
1.52
9.10
3.19
1.46
4.42
0.81
4.92
1.00
2.87
0.43
2.61
0.38
43.81
LREE
HREE
MREE
LREE/HREE
Eu/Eu*
La/Yb
t.1
t.3
t1.3
t.4
83.75
5.76
18.18
14.54
0.81
4.41
1.027
1.014
1.021
1.058
21.72
6.29
15.80
3.45
0.83
0.23
1.017
1.032
1.025
1.052
Trachyte
Alk. syenite
Rare earth elments (ppm)
K13a
K7
K3
K26a
103.00
182.90
131.00
57.30
172.80
350.90
268.80
125.00
25.90
38.41
32.96
14.63
92.92
138.40
128.00
55.10
15.77
25.75
26.07
11.32
1.87
3.32
4.87
1.21
11.40
24.10
25.50
10.60
1.84
4.00
4.36
1.92
10.70
22.80
24.80
10.50
2.37
4.50
4.65
2.09
7.68
13.10
12.90
6.16
1.29
2.03
1.89
0.966
7.97
12.19
11.19
6.05
1.20
1.71
1.52
0.89
456.17
824.11
678.51
303.73
Some elemental ratios
393.82
710.61
560.76
252.03
18.14
29.03
27.5
14.06
43.95
84.47
90.25
37.64
21.71
24.47
20.39
17.93
0.44
0.28
0.61
0.59
8.73
10.14
7.91
6.40
0.965
1.029
1.025
1.074
0.928
0.997
1.038
1.037
0.946
1.013
1.032
1.055
1.095
1.099
1.077
1.070
Syenite
Syenodiorite
K32a
37.00
76.70
9.23
36.00
6.07
0.82
4.75
0.67
3.13
0.57
1.56
0.26
1.92
0.35
179.03
K9
59.80
126.50
15.11
58.50
11.40
2.27
10.10
1.62
8.48
1.61
4.53
0.72
4.10
0.66
305.4
K1a
114.40
231.10
26.93
100.10
18.64
2.62
16.20
2.59
14.20
2.70
7.67
1.21
7.08
1.08
546.52
K25
85.50
171.80
19.82
74.80
13.99
4.53
12.30
1.87
9.43
1.69
4.39
0.64
3.76
0.54
405.06
158.93
4.09
16.01
38.86
0.52
13.03
1.028
0.957
0.992
0.991
259.91
10.01
35.48
25.97
0.68
9.40
1.043
0.999
1.021
1.030
472.53
17.04
56.95
27.73
0.48
10.92
1.040
0.997
1.018
1.054
351.91
9.33
43.81
37.72
0.83
21.96
1.029
1.001
1.015
1.054
5. Radioactivity
A total number of 10 rock samples representing the
gabbro, syenite as well as trachyte were analyzed to
299
Fig. 9 (a) U-Th variation diagram (b) U-Th/U variation diagram (c) Th-Th/U variation diagram. The plotted trends are
visual estimates. Symbols as in Fig. 4.
6. Discussion
The general constant Zr/Nb ratios in El-Kahfa rocks
(Fig. 8a), and the constant Sr/Rb ratios in the trachyte
and syenite (Table 2) imply similar bulk distribution
co-efficient (D-values) for these element pairs, which
are related to fractionating mineral assemblages. Zhao
et al. [52] referred that these constant ratios reflect the
compositions of the parental magma and trend to
mitigate against wall rock assimilation having played a
significant role.
Bailey [62] and Woolley and Jones [45] explained
the bimodality with the occurrence of large volumes of
felsic rocks in Shilwa alkaline complex province,
Malawi, and other alkaline provinces by a model for
the generation of syenitic and more evolved felsic
magmas include parental melting of metasomatized
300
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
301
302
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
303
304