Criteria

Introduction

Aim / Problem
statement and
objectives

Literature reviewed

Results

Not Achieved
Very poor language errors,
difficult to read, ineffective, or
inappropriate.

Partially achieved
Weak introduction Syntax errors,
formulation and structure.

Generallyachieved
Partially effective, language and
logic need revision.

Achieved
Clear, effective and logical. Good.

Achieved with distinction

Excellent, scientific and logical
approach to introduce/identify the
problem. It creates an expectation,
motivation for study clearly set out.

[1 to 3]

[4 to 6]
Partially effective, language and
logic need revision.

[7 to 8]
Clear, effective and logical. Well
structured.

[9 to 10]
Excellent, aim and objectives of
the practical clearly set out,
scientific and logical approach to
solve the problem.

[0]
Literature inappropriate.
Insufficient amount of literature
reviewed. Presented illogical and
unstructured. Language errors,
difficult to read.

[1]
Insufficient amount of literature
reviewed. Presented illogical and
unstructured. Syntax errors.

[2]
Sufficient amount of literature
reviewed. Partially effective,
language and logic need revision.

[3 to 5]
Clear, effective and logical.
Relevant theory presented. Well
structured, good technical writing
skills displayed.

[6]
Excellent, a good overview on the
current state of knowledge given.
Well written and logically
presented.

[0]
Not presented. Interpretation and
discussion of results insufficient,
inappropriate & illogical. Language
& syntax errors, difficult to read.

[1 to 3]
Interpretation and discussion of
results insufficient, inappropriate &
illogical. Language & syntax
errors, difficult to read.

[4 to 6]
Partially effective interpretation
and discussion of results.
Language, structure and logic
need revision.

[7 to 8]
Relevant data presented. Logical
discussion and interpretation of
results. Clear, effective and logical.
Well structured, good technical
writing skills displayed.

[9 to 10]
Excellent. Links / connection with
theory reviewed. Well written and
logically presented.

[0]

[1 to 3]
Weak conclusion Syntax errors,
formulation and structure.

[4 to 6]
Partially effective, language and
logic need revision.

[7 to 8]
Clear, effective and logical. Good
language skills displayed.

[9 to 10]
Excellent, scientific and logical
approach to address the problem
as stated. Refer to data and theory
presented. Weighing results and
logical arguments presented.

[0]

[1 to 3]
Some references cited,
referencing style partially effective.

[4 to 6]
References cited, referencing style and format effective.

[0]

[1]

[0]
Very poor not stated, ineffective,
or inappropriate.

Conclusion and
recommendations

Very poor language errors,

difficult to read, ineffective, or
inappropriate.

References

No references cited.
No list of reference.

Not clearly stated, illogical

approach to the problem.
Language errors.

[7 to 8]

[9 to 10]
Correct and effective use of
references.

[2 to 3]

[4]

Final grade [50x2=100]