Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Summer, 2016
Subject: BUS 505 Principles of Accounting
Submitted by:
MD.Rezwanul Islam
MD. Mahade Hasan
Farhana Islam
Yasin Ahmed
Rusana Khan
SECTION
ID: 1530538660
ID: 1531482660
ID: 1531352060
ID: 1531393660
ID: 1531323060
1
Submitted to:
DR Frank Henry Wade
CPA, CIA, CMA. CISA
North South University
Table of Contents
1.0 Professional Bodies of GAAP and IFRS...............................................................3
2.0 Use of Accounting Principle in Bangladesh........................................................3
3.0 Business Combination....................................................................................... 3
4.0 Difference between GAPP VS IFRS: Business Combination................................4
1
companies to prepare and disclose their financial statements. Over 100 countries permit or require IFRS
for public companies, with more expected to transition to IFRS by 2015.
3
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
The principal guidance for business combinations in US GAAP (ASC 805, Business Combinations) and
IFRS (IFRS 3(R), Business Combinations) represents the culmination of the first major convergence
project between the IASB and the FASB. Pursuant to ASC 805 and IFRS 3(R), all business combinations
are accounted for using the acquisition method. Upon obtaining control of another entity, the underlying
transaction is measured at fair value, establishing the basis on which the assets, liabilities and
noncontrolling interests of the acquired entity are measured. As described below, IFRS 3(R) provides an
alternative to measuring noncontrolling interest at fair value with limited exceptions. Although the new
standards are substantially converged, certain differences still exist.
Significant
differences
GAPP
Measurement of
noncontrolling interest
Acquirees operating
leases
Noncontrolling
interest
measured at
fair
value,
including
noncontrolling
interests share of goodwill.
IFRS
is
the
Noncontrolling
interest
is
measured
either at fair value including
goodwill,
or at its proportionate share of the
fair
value of the acquirees identifiable
net
assets, exclusive of goodwill.
Separate recognition of an
intangible
asset or liability is required only if
the
acquiree is a lessee. If the acquiree
is the
lessor, the terms of the lease are
taken
into account in estimating the fair
value
of the asset subject to the lease.
Separate recognition of an
intangible
asset or liability is not required.
4
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
US GAAP
Subsequent Measurement If
contingent assets and liabilities
are initially recognized at fair
value, an acquirer should
develop a systematic and
rational basis for subsequently
measuring and accounting for
those
assets and liabilities depending
on
their nature.
If
amounts
are
initially
recognized and
measured in accordance with
ASC 450,
the subsequent accounting and
measurement should be based on
that guidance.
Subsequent Measurement
Liabilities
subject
to
contingencies are
subsequently measured at the
higher
of (i) the amount that would be
recognized in accordance with
IAS 37,
or (ii) the amount initially
recognized
less, if appropriate, cumulative
amortization
recognized
in
accordance
with IAS 18.
5
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
Combination of entities
under common control
US GAPP
IFRS
6
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
IFRS
The acquirees contingent liabilities are
recognized at the acquisition date
provided their fair values can be
measured reliably. The contingent
liability is measured subsequently at the
higher of the amount initially recognized
less, if appropriate, cumulative
amortization recognized under the
revenue guidance (IAS 18) or the best
estimate of the amount required to settle
(under the provisions guidanceIAS 37).
Contingent assets are not recognized.
IFRS
Goodwill is allocated to a cash-generating
unit (CGU) or group of CGUs, as defined
within the guidance.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least
on an annual basis and between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances
change that may indicate an impairment
7
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
US GAPP
Under US GAAP, the seller should
determine whether the arrangement
meets the definition of a derivative. If the
arrangement meets the definition of a
derivative, the arrangement should be
recorded at fair value. If the arrangement
does not meet the definition of a
derivative, the seller should make an
accounting policy election to record the
arrangement at either fair value at
inception or at the settlement amount
when the consideration is realized or is
realizable, whichever is earlier.
IFRS
Under IFRS, a contract to receive
contingent consideration that gives the
seller the right to receive cash or other
financial assets when the contingency is
resolved meets the definition of a
financial asset. When a contract for
contingent consideration meets the
definition of a financial asset, it is
measured using one of the measurement
categories specified in the financial
instruments guidance.
IFRS
IFRS does not specifically address such
transactions. In practice, entities develop
and consistently apply an accounting
policy; management can elect to apply the
acquisition method of accounting or the
predecessor value method to a business
combination involving entities under
common control.
8
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
Different entities might be determined to be the acquirer when applying purchase accounting. Impacted
entities should refer to the Consolidation chapter for a more detailed discussion of differences related to
the consolidation models between the frameworks that might create significant differences in this area
US GAPP
The acquirer is determined by reference
to ASC 81010, under which generally the
party that holds greater than 50 percent
of the voting shares has control, unless
the acquirer is the primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity in accordance
with ASC 810.
IFRS
The acquirer is determined by reference
to the consolidation guidance, under
which generally the party that holds
greater than 50 percent of the voting
rights has control. In addition, control
might exist when less than 50 percent of
the voting rights are held, if the acquirer
has the power to most significantly affect
the variable returns of the entity in
accordance with IFRS 10.
The lack of push-down accounting under IFRS can lead to significant differences in instances where push
down accounting was utilized under US GAAP.
US GAPP
IFRS
This following easy the key characteristics of a business and identifies which transactions require the
application of business combination accounting. Business combination accounting is referred to as the
9
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
acquisition method in ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), and in International Financial
Reporting Standard 3 (revised 2008), Business Combinations (IFRS 3) (collectively, the Standards).
Determining whether the acquisition method applies to a transaction begins with understanding whether
the transaction involves the acquisition of one or more businesses and whether it is a business
combination within the scope of the Standards. Some differences exist between the definitions of a
business combination under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The converged definitions use terms that U.S. GAAP and
IFRS define differently in other nonconverged standards. For example, the Standards state that for a
business combination to occur, an acquirer must obtain control over a business. U.S. GAAP and IFRS
define control differently. That difference may lead to divergent accounting results. For example, recently
issued IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS 10), incorporates the concepts of effective
control and substantive potential voting rights, whereas U.S. GAAP does not. Active FASB and IASB
(collectively, the Boards) projects may result in amendments to existing guidance. These projects
include the FASBs response to the Financial Accounting Foundations (FAF) post implementation review
of ASC 805 as well as the IASB and IFRS Interpretations Committees (IFRS IC) post implementation
review of
IFRS 3. Amendments from these projects, if any, may impact the guidance in this chapter. The FASB has
also undertaken projects related to principal versus agent assessments in consolidations and the definition
of a business. Final standards for these projects have not yet been released as of 31 December 2013.
Following is a summary of the FASB projects:
Consolidation: The proposal would provide guidance for determining whether a decision maker is
acting as a principal or an agent for another entity. A decision maker acting as a principal consolidates the
other entity, while a decision maker acting as an agent generally does not. The proposal is largely
consistent with the principal versus agent guidance in the IASBs recently issued consolidation standard,
IFRS 10. The proposed changes to the consolidation model also would rescind the deferral of the current
consolidation guidance, ASC 810, Consolidations (ASC 810), for certain investment entities. A final
accounting standard update for this project is expected to be issued in 2014.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business: In May 2013 the FASB added a project intended to clarify the
definition of a business. The project will include clarifying the guidance for partial sales or transfers and
the corresponding acquisition of partial interests in a nonfinancial asset or assets.
acquiree, without the exchange of consideration, or through transactions that combine multiple companies
to form a single company. The Standards scope excludes joint venture formations because by definition
no party obtains control.
There are differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The Standards are largely converged, but
use terms that are defined differently in other nonconverged standards. Different control models, for
example, exist under U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and the definition of control is important in identifing a
business combination. These differences may lead to different conclusions about whether a business
combination has occurred.
13.0 REFERENCE
Business Combinations (IFRS 3). (2015). Including Comparisons with US GAAP, China GAAP,
and India Accounting Standards International Trends in Financial Reporting under IFRS, 263279. doi:10.1002/9781119197102.ch20
Bohuov, H., & Svoboda, P. (2008). IFRS and US GAAP convergence in the area of business
combination. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis Acta Univ.
Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 56(6), 13-24. doi:10.11118/actaun200856060013
11
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
Remaining differences in other IFRSs and US GAAP. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from
http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Business-Combinations/Pages/Remainingdifferences-in-other-IFRSs-and-US-GAAP.aspx
IAS Plus. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from http://www.iasplus.com/enus/standards/international/ifrs-en-us/ifrs3
U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS: Business combinations at-a-glance. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016,
from http://rsmus.com/pdf/business_combinations-at-a-glance.pdf
Business Combinations. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from http://www.ifrs.org/CurrentProjects/IASB-Projects/Business-Combinations/Pages/Business-Combinations-II.aspx
IASB Issues Business Combinations Statement. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from
http://www.valuationresearch.com/knowledge-base/alert/iasb-issues-business-combinationsstatement
IFRS 3 (revised) business combinations. (2014, September 09). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from
http://www.accaglobal.com/an/en/discover/cpd-articles/corporate-reporting/ifrs3combinations.html
Schmid, D. Martino, R. DiNardo, T (2015). IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences. Retrieved
from: http://www.pwc.com/us/en/cfodirect/assets/pdf/accounting-guides/pwc-ifrs-us-gaap-similaritiesand-differences-2015.pdf
Santoro, J. Bielstein, M. M.(2014). IFRS compared to US GAAP: An overview. Retrieved from:
http://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/IFRS-compared-toUS-GAAP-An-overview-O-201411.pdf
Fabian, S. Bachman, H. (2015). Comparison between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Retrieved from:
http://www.grantthornton.com.br/images/src/gt%20comparison%20usgaap_ifrs%202015.pdf
12
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper
Business Combination Definition - AccountingTools. (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from
http://www.accountingtools.com/dictionary-business-combinatio
Business combinations and noncontrolling interests - 2014 global second edition (February
2016). (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2016, from
http://www.pwc.com/us/en/cfodirect/publications/accounting-guides/global-guide-to-accountingfor-business-combinations-and-noncontrolling-interests.html
13
BUS 505 Accounting Principle Term paper