Surname 1

Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay
Frankenstein is a book of fiction written by English novelist Mary Shelley. It recounts the
tale of a youthful scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who created a serpent-like grotesque in a
heretical experiment. Shelly wrote the story when she was only 18 years old, which was
anonymously, published in 1818 in London when she was barely 20 years old. It began as a short
story with its themes focusing on the cultural aspect of the society during Shellys time and
characters representing struggle against societal control (Scott, 1818).
Nevertheless, in the near beginning of the nineteenth century, outlook on human values
were extensively allied with natural sciences. On the other hand, detractor implied that anatomy
and psychology were connected to literary works. This resulted in the disputation of irregularities
in the human standard and thus the differences were rejected through an innate reaction. It is
argued that even though the monster developed language skills as well as emotions, it is a
grotesque being, thus does not fit any ideal. According to Shelly's stylistic techniques, voyager
Walton's Roberts epistolary contact with his sister, as an external outline into Frankenstein's
remembrance that guides him even after the monster is created (Scott, 1818). The voice used is
the first-person narrative in Waltons voice and the writer Shelly, in turn, uses dialogue to
provide the thoughts the other characters including mysterious and violent events and a decaying
society. Most of the critics about the book are based on Shellys life. Similarly, they revolve
around the narration of authorship and creation. The work lacks leading feminine personality,

Surname 2
whereas it has focused its entire interest on the notion of the idealistic artiste. However, the
change in attention was contributed by the emergence of the feminist theory in the 1970s and the
1980s that established an intellectual significance and the importance of female novelists.
The novel has been assessed right through the lens of masculinity as feminine is not
fundamental (Scott, 1818). Furthermore, the relationship between women figures in the story,
namely, Elizabeth and Justine faces execution as they establish bond emerging from brief
conversations on mutual experiences. Notably, females were tenuous in Shelly's life due to the
impulsive loss of her mother as well as the dubious affiliation with her sibling, Jane, who was
afterward alleged to bear a child with Shelly's spouse. Also, the nun's name then changes to
Claire. On the parent-child tensions, the novel advocates for communion as it is portrayed and
influenced by Shelly's own troubled family relationships.
He, however, agrees that parental irresponsibility is the wider and the general rule of
Frankenstein. In her opening paragraphs, Laura Coleridge says that Frankenstein is well
recognized, as the story was heavily influenced by marrying Shelly. Although, it demonstrates
the failure of human beings; parent, in such a way that they can take part in the society rather
than retreat into themselves (Scott, 1818). She also says that although Shelly characterized
herself as fine and having warm relationships, her actions were a natural response to own neglect
as a child. In the novel, Shelly tries to use nature like a recuperative mediator for Frankenstein,
though he appears to be prevailing over by anguish for the death of family and acquaintances,
hence shunning humanity as well as seeking the quality of health and the relaxation to strengthen
his spirits. As Frankenstein progresses, Shelly tries to create a connection between Victor and life
instead of trying to describe the mood with metaphors. He over revolutionized the genres of
literature, fiction, and the scientists, portraying them as revolutionaries. His novel is also seen to

Surname 3
be a feeble imitation and exhibits an adamant tendency towards materialism giving a review that
the book might have been written by her husband, Percy Shelly, and not Mary Shelly as it is
widely believed to have been the case. Most people also tend to argue how a monster assembled
by scientists went ahead even to develop a mind of its own. Shelly wrote the elevated status of
the romantic artist and the horror stories written by while she was only thirteen years old. This
widely offers artistic flare and a wide maturity gap between the writers age and the kind of
maturity she possesses making it remain an undisputed fictional masterpiece. When Mary was
done with writing the novel in May 1817, she went ahead and sent her manuscript to two
different publishers who went ahead to reject it as it would not only amuse the readers unless
those whose tastes had deplorably deviated. A writer from the monthly review also described the
setting as improbable and an untrue story describing it as an uncouth story that would and was
not leading to any possible sensible conclusion. He also described it as a book that lacked any
moral implications and would seem absurd to all the reading generations whatsoever
Its, however, significant to note that despite all the criticisms leveled against Shelly's
controversial novel, some people enjoyed reading the story, as a result terming it as a unique
article. Johnson linked to Sir Walter Scott in the Backwoods Edinburgh journal, and stated that
he was overwhelmed with the eminent thought of the writers creativity saying that Shelly was a
genius instead and that she had a happy and a great power of expression. Others stated that
Shelly was of age, in which heart triumphed overhead (Scott, 1818).

Surname 4
Work Cited
Scott, W. (1818). _Belle Assemblee_ Review of _Frankenstein_, March 1818 | Romantic Circles.
Rc.umd.edu. Retrieved 3 March 1939, from
http://www.rc.umd.edu/reference/chronologies/mschronology/reviews/barev.html