Sei sulla pagina 1di 35

Economic Shape Moulding Production

Methods in comparison

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 1

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Steam Usage of Different Processes

Explanation of process methods


- Conventional, ECO LTH, Classic- LTH

Production limits for different methods in different markets


- Europe, Indonesia, China, USA

Kurtz helps you save


- Comparison of production costs: conventional/ ECO-LTH
- Comparison of production costs: conventional/ Classic-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 2

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Comparison of the various processes

1. Vacuum Technology
2. Classic-LTH
3. Eco-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 3

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

1. Vacuum technology
Design :

Steam / Air

Ejector
Water
Water

Steam chamber is part of the


machine
Nozzles in mould walls
Relatively inexpensive

Fll injector

mould construction
Cooling of total mould mass
to demoulding temperature

Vacuum /
Kondensate

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 4

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Determination of steam requirement


Mould mass is heated up and cooled down in every cycle

steam quantity
mmould O cpAl O DT
msteam =

Dh

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 5

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Example calculation (without losses)


Mould for shape moulding machine
with a foaming area of 1 m
mmould = 160 kg
cpAl

= 0.92 kJ/kg/K

DT

= (120C 80C) = 40 K

Dh

= 2203 kJ/kg

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 6

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Example calculation (without losses)


steam quantity / cycle
160 kg O 0.92 kJ/kg/K O 40 K / 2203 kJ/kg = 2.67 kg

steam costs / year in two-shift operation


2.67 kg O 60 cycles/h O 3520 h/a = 564,5 t steam
steam costs approx. 25 / t
steam costs approx. 14,100 p.a.
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 7

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Energy balance sheet with vacuum technology

Qzu

= Qfoam + Qpurging + losses + Qmould


foam
0,4%
purging and
losses
46,6 %
mould
58,0%
mould
foam

Energy shares

purging & losses

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 8

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Comparison of the various processes

1. Vacuum Technology
2. Classic-LTH
3. Eco-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 9

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

2. Classic- LTH: technology Design :


Steam distribution in mould
Media are directly supplied to
cavity = reduction of losses
Ejector

Steam /
air

Steam /
air

Vacuum

Vacuum
Fill
injector

Coating on all sides of areas


with steam contact
High mould costs
Fast mould cycle
Short cycle time =
high productivity

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 10

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Comparison of the various processes

1. Vacuum Technology
2. Classic-LTH
3. Eco-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 11

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Design:

3. ECO- LTH

Nozzles as with vacuum


technology

Water

Water

Steam /
air

Steam /
air

Vacuum

Vacuum
Fill
injector

Ejector

Mould cooling with


spray nozzles
Steam distribution ca. 2 - 3x
bigger than Classic- LTH
No coating
of areas with contact to
material
No tempering channel

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 12

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Energy consumption comparison of the


various processes

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 13

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison
Explanation of energy usages in different process methods

[ kg / m / cycle]

1. Steam
4

3,5

3,5
3
2,5

1,7

1,1

1,5
1
0,5
0
1

Vacuum
technology

Eco-LTH

Classic-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 14

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison
Explanation of energy usages in different process methods

[ m / m / cycle]

2. Air
2,5

2
2

1,5

0,9

0,8

0,5

Vacuum
technology

Eco-LTH

Classic-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 15

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison
Explanation of energy usages in different process methods

[ l / m / cycle]

3. Water
100
90

87

80
70
60

41,5

50

31,5

40
30
20
10
0
1

Vacuum
technology

Eco-LTH

Classic-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 16

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison
Explanation of energy usages in different process methods

Vacuum technology

Eco-LTH

Classic-LTH

100

87

90
80

70

60

5
4

50

41,5
3,5

31,5

3
2

1,1

40
30

1,7

Water [ l / m / cycle]

Air [ m / m / cycle]

Steam [ kg / m / cycle]

10

20

0,9 0,8

10

Steam

Air

Water

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 17

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Determination of production costs

Company specific data

Machine related data

Mould related data

Process specific data

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 18

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Company specific data

Calculatory interest

Wage per hour / operator

Non-wage labour costs

Building costs pro m

Energy costs per KW

Energy costs per to Dampf

Energy costs per m Luft

Energy costs l Wasser

Material costs per kg

Overhead costs (%)

Capacity

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 19

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Machine related data

Steam chamber dimensions

Purchase price

Amortization period

Space requirement

Maintenance

Installed capacity

Production duration

Workforce

Average cycle time

Number of identical machines

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 20

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Mould related data

Number of moulds per machine

Mould costs

Cavities

Moulding dimensions

Density

Moulding weight

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 21

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Process related data

Steam usage

Air usage

Water usage

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 22

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Production cost charts


with a 2 cavity mold for the following machines:

K813

K813 LTH Classic

K813 LTH Eco

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 23

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Cost [ ]

K813 Vacuum technology

120.000
100.000
80.000
60.000
40.000
20.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 24

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Cost [ ]

K813 Vacuum technology

K813 LTH-Classic

120.000
100.000
80.000
60.000
40.000
20.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 25

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Cost [ ]

K813 Vacuum technology

K813 LTH-Classic

K813 LTH-Eco

120.000
100.000
80.000
60.000
40.000
20.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 26

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Savings: Comparing vacuum technology between the LTHClassic and LTH-Eco


with a yearly production of 699.840 Pcs.

Savings [ ]

45.877

40.342

50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
-

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

Classic-LTH

Eco-LTH
page 27

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Capacity with a yearly production of: 699.840 Pcs.


100%
100%

Capacity [%]

76%

71%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%
1

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

Vacuum
Technology

Eco-LTH

Classic-LTH
page 28

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Savings: Comparing vacuum technology between the LTHClassic and LTH-Eco


with a yearly production of 150.000 Pcs.

3.826
Savings [ ]

4.000

3.000

2.000

192

1.000

Classic-LTH

Eco-LTH

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 29

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Energy costs comparison of countries

USA

Germany

China

Singapore

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 30

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Country production cost chart comparison


with a 2 cavity mold for the following machines:

K813

K813 LTH Classic

K813 LTH Eco

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 31

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

USA

K813 Vakuumtechnik

K813 LTH-Classic

K813 LTH-Eco

Cost [ ]

100.000
90.000
80.000
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 32

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

China

K813 Vakuumtechnik

K813 LTH-Classic

K813 LTH-Eco

Cost [ ]

90.000
80.000
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 33

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Singapore

K813 Vakuumtechnik

K813 LTH-Classic

K813 LTH-Eco

120.000

Cost [ ]

110.000
100.000
90.000
80.000
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
0

150.000

300.000

450.000

600.000

Quantity [ Pcs. ]
Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 34

Economic Shape Moulding Production


Methods in comparison

Summary:

LTH-Classic and LTH-Eco:


Advantages in countries with higher energy costs

LTH-Classic
unbeatable with larger production numbers

LTH-Eco
reduces production costs even at lower production
numbers

Kurtz GmbH
10.02.wb.smv1

page 35

Potrebbero piacerti anche