Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Project Details
Name of building
Foundation Garments
Purpose of building
Garment Factory
Age of building
17 Yrs (approximately)
Location
Melsiripura , Kurunegala
Occupants (approximate)
450
Focus of report
Stability of structure
Peripheries included
Ventilation
Client Representative
2. Introduction
1
The structural stability report is prepared with the motive of saving life & property by
foreseeing any critical failures in the structure, it shall be gauging the present and future
stability of the building by considering the physical condition based on the site visit made on
03.05.2016 and the available structural details produced by the client. The current condition
of the building was juxtaposed with the generally accepted structural & sanitary requirements
adequate to facilitate the purpose it has been serving to date. Wherever the building condition
does not comply with the accepted quality or requirements, necessary measures have been
provided to rectify the condition.
The Factory primarily consists of a basement, and a large ground floor which houses the
production area, the office, AQL, packing, cutting, sample area etc. In addition to this, the
facility also includes two power houses, a canteen area with a kitchen and toilet facility for
men and women.
The ground floor consists of two portal framed structures with prefabricated H and I sections.
The two portal frames have been merged at the center and the joint has been concealed using
Zn/Al partitions. The foundations at either sides of the portal frames have been either encased
through a floor concrete within the production floor / AQL / Packing area or a reinforced
concrete slab as in the Fabric / Cutting / Sampling area. The ground floor has been provided
with ventilation through a consistent supply of water on one end of the building and a system
of exhaust fans at the other end. The Zn/Al roofing structure is laid on Z shaped purlins
bolted to the portal frame at regular intervals.
3. Site Observations
3.1
Documented data
2
Description
1. Structural drawings
2. Architectural drawings
Availability
Yes
No
Remarks
3.2
Condition
Yes
No
Remarks
3
1. Critical Settlements
a few locations.
8. Tests required for Steel
9. Tests required for Concrete
10. Failure in masonry walls
3.2.2
1. Critical Settlements
2. Deflection in portal frame
3. Failure of steel sections
4. Failures in bolted joints
Condition
Yes
No
Remarks
Steel
sections
had
been
3.2.3
Condition
Yes
No
1. Critical Settlements
Remarks
3.2.4
Canteen area
Description
1. Critical Settlements
2. Deflection in portal frame
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Cracks on floor
8. Tests required for Steel
9. Tests required for Concrete
10. Failure in masonry walls
Condition
Yes
No
Remarks
3.2.5
Toilet area
Description
1. Critical Settlements
2. Deflection in portal frame
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Cracks on floor
8. Tests required for Steel
9. Tests required for Concrete
10. Failure in masonry walls
Condition
Yes
No
Remarks
4. Conclusion
Most Steel sections were in good condition, and they appeared to have been maintained and
treated adequately.
While the production area did not appear to have major concerns pertaining to the structural
stability of the building, the other half of the main building which was above the stores /
inspection area requires remedial action, since the cracks that have appeared on the floor
cant be deemed to be simply superficial cracks, owing to the appearance of the nature of the
cracks and the condition of the soffit of the slab, when viewed from the basement.
5. Recommendations
(a) Wire brush all corroded steel sections and welded joints, treat them with one coat of
metal primer (Zink Phosphate), two coats of anti corrosive paint and single coat of an
enamel paint of an approved brand.
(b) The concrete H iron interface in locations where the portal frame meets the slab could
be separated with a construction joint / expansive material such as rubber/neoprin.
(c) The damaged locations of the roof need to be repaired and the damaged/dampned
insulation material needs to be replaced.
(d) It is advisable to not perform further loading on the slab above the stores area, since it
may aggravate the cracks and the deflections of the slab.
6. Photographs
10
11
12
13