Diaz 1

Randy Diaz.
Prof Kane
English 115
23 October, 2016
Essay 2
In this world, everyone has a different interpretation of whats being communicated and
yet people still come up with a composite reality in which they can all interact productively, but
how you ask? It is because we either have the same goal in mind however some may argue what
if we dont share the same goals? Then if we dont share the same goal share we have a bond
between one another are willing took work with one another despite are differences in
perspectives to composite one reality. This can be seen in todays attributes of world. Such as the
debate of 2016.
With people having different interpretations of whats being communicated we still have
a composite reality in which we all interact and thats because we have all have a common goal.
This can be seen in the 1st presidential debate of 2016 that was on September 2nd, being between
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Within the debate Hillary states that she has a plan about
taxing the wealthy, which will overall help the economy (Debate 2016). While in the other hand,
Trump states that he will fix the economy by reforming the tax code, trade policies, and have
companies storm into the country which will create competition which will overall as well lead
to a better economy. (Debate 2016)As you can see they have different interpretations on how to
make America better and help its being overall and yet they are able to come together on this
same stage and speak their differences despite dislike each other and having different opinions.
Its because they have the same goal. They both plan on making America a better place by fixing

Diaz 2
the economy and doing other several other work to make America great, however they have
plans with different methods to them, yet the over generic goal is the same. They both see reality
different, and have different interpretations on how making America get back up on its feet. This
overall objective brings these two together to composite one reality where they can productively
interact with one another and communicate. Despite their routes being different the end result
will be the same. They both have the same objective of winning the general election despite what
their differences of methods to win and offerings. This can also be seen in many corporations
and unions, such as movie productions, restaurants and especially congress.
There are many different perspectives and interpretations of whats is being
communicated in the world and a great example is congress. Now congress is made up of
branches, more importantly where delegates from different representatives of America such as
democrats and republicans come together and discussion issue and make laws. Michael Bruno
states that congress have had arguments over nuclear weapons and seeking negotiations between
Russia, to overall help America. (38) As you can see these delegates come together, with
different perspectives on how the matter should be solved and different interpretations on how it
should be addressed. However paths to fix the issue on nuclear weapons and seeking
negotiations between Russia is overall to help America. As you can see this objective of theirs
brings these delegates of republicans and democrats together despite their differences in
interpretations and perspectives. Their slight interpretations of whats being interacted overall is
their goal which helps them composite a reality in which they come together productively to
interact. Similar to Trump and Hillary, however this time its with a mass of people. We see
how this problem of theirs unites them. Although some may argue what if they dont have the
same goal, people can still come up with a composite reality.

Diaz 3
If are different perspectives on whats being communicated to create a composite reality
is not based on everyone having the same a goal, then it is because we have a bond with the
person we are communicating with. In her article Two ways to belong in America Bharani
Mukherjee states Mira and I have stayed sisterly close by phone. In our regular Sunday morning
conversations, we are unguardedly affectionate. I am her only blood relative on this continent
she and I found ourselves unable to maintain the same polite discretion.. Mira and Differ,
however in the ways in which we hope to interact with the country that we have chosen to live
in. She is happier to live in America as expatriate Indian than as an immigrant American.(1-2).
Mukherjee reveals to us within her article that her and her sister have different perspectives and
whats being communicated when it comes to living in America as an immigrant. Her sister Mira
wants to stay in America and maintain a recognition as an Indian while Mukherjee needs to feel
a part of the community. Overall Mukherjee comes to acknowledge her sisters perspective and
interpretations of living in America as immigrant, to composite a reality, because she and her
sister have a bond. Throughout the article she consistently expresses the relationship she has with
her sister, saying affectionate Blood relative and revealing too us that they went through this
immigration in America together. A bond is based on affection and emotion towards one another.
When you have a bond with someone your willing to accept each others perspectives on whats
being communicated, despite each other interpretations because you have a relationship, a bond
with this person. In terms of Mukherjee and Mira they are sister, they have a family relationship
between one another that cant be broken. So they are willing to interact productively together
because of their bond between one another.
This is no fantasy world but it is without a doubt that everyone perceives reality
differently more or less because we all have different interpretations of whats being

Diaz 4
communicated, people are able to establish a composite reality in which they can all interact with
one another because they either have the same goals or they have bonds. These goals helps unite
people, to interact productively with their different interpretations because they their objective is
the same, so despite their different perspectives they lead to the same end result. However if
people dont have the same goal in mind than they have bond between one in another in which
they are able to come together productively communicate with one another despite seeing reality
different because and their this bond between one another which is composed of emotions that
brings people to communicate with one another. These concepts and aspects of goals and bonds
can be seen in todays modern society with presidential debate, associations and various articles.
For this reason, regardless of everyones perspective of whats being communicated, and their
interpretations we are still able composite reality where everyone interacts productively together.