Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1775
I. I NTRODUCTION
Paper approved by S. A. Jafar, the Editor for Wireless Communication Theory and CDMA of the IEEE Communications Society. Manuscript received
February 14, 2007; revised July 10, 2007.
The authors are with the School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer
Engineering, Newcastle University, UK (e-mail: stephane.le-goff@ncl.ac.uk).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TCOMM.2008.070021
c 2008 IEEE
0090-6778/08$25.00
1776
0tT, (1)
Sub-vector 0
Sub-vector 2
Sub-vector 1
u=0
u=1
u=2
u=3
u=4
u=5
u=6
u=7
u=8
u=9
n=
m=
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
0
6
1
7
2
8
3
9
4
10 11 12 13 14
0 1 2 3 4
Fig. 1. List of the 10 phase vectors Bu that can be used to apply our SLM
technique to an OFDM system with N = 15 subcarriers, when each vector
Bu is divided into L = 3 subvectors with M = 5 and K = 2. We only
show the moduli of the elements bu,n since their phases can take any random
values.
(3)
LE GOFF et al.: A NOVEL SELECTED MAPPING TECHNIQUE FOR PAPR REDUCTION IN OFDM SYSTEMS
Es,m =
E[|ym,l |2 ] 2
.
E[(hm,l )2 ]
(4)
L1
1
|ym,l |2
L
(5)
l=0
and
E[(hm,l )2 ]
L1
1
(hm,l )2 ,
L
l=0
N
N
N
N
= 125, 8 dB
= 510, 8 dB
= 125, 25 dB
= 510, 25 dB
N
N
N
N
= 255, 8 dB
= 1020, 8 dB
= 255, 25 dB
= 1020, 25 dB
1.E +00
1.E -01
1777
1.E -02
1.E -03
1.E -04
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Constant C
III. E XAMPLE
To illustrate the proposed SLM technique, we consider in
this Section the example of an OFDM system using 16-QAM
over N subcarriers. The length of the subvectors is M = 5
symbols and K = 2 symbols are extended in each subvector.
With such parameters,
PAPR reduction can thus be achieved
using U = 52 = 10 possible phase vectors Bu . Fig. 1 shows
the list of these vectors Bu . The phases of the elements bu,n ,
u {0, 1, ..., U 1}, n {0, 1, ..., N 1}, are randomly set
to either 0 or (with equal probabilities). All results given
below are obtained by computer simulations assuming that the
fading samples follow a Rayleigh distribution defined so that
E[(hm,l )2 ] = 1.
A. Probability of side information detection failure
Fig. 2 shows the probability of detection failure, Pdf , as a
function of the constant C, for two values of the signal-tonoise ratio (SNR = 8 and 25 dB) and four different numbers
of subcarriers (N = 125, 255, 510, and 1020). Note that
the numbers of subcarriers are chosen to be multiples of
M = 5 close to the usual powers of two used in practice.
The parameter Pdf represents the probability that the receiver
cannot recover the side information, i.e. a complete OFDM
frame (vector X) is lost. The SNR is defined as the ratio
between the average energy per transmitted bit, Eb , and the
one-sided power spectral density, N0 , of white Gaussian noise.
From Fig. 2, it is observed that the SNR does not have
a great influence on the value of Pdf . The latter is, on the
other hand, much more dependent on the values of parameters
C and N . As C is increased, the performance of our algorithm improves, simply because a higher value of C allows
for a better distinction between extended and non-extended
symbols after transmission through the channel. Increasing N
1778
1.E+00
N
N
N
N
N
N
1.E-01
= 65 (class. SL M )
= 65 (no PAPR reduct.)
= 125 (new SL M )
= 255 (class. SLM)
= 255 (no PAPR reduct.)
= 510 (new SL M )
N
N
N
N
N
N
= 65 (new SLM)
= 125 (class. SLM)
= 125 (no PAPR re duct.)
= 255 (new SL M)
= 510 (class. SLM)
= 510 (no PAPR reduct.)
1.E +00
BER
1.E-02
Perfect SI
1.E-03
1.E -01
Pr[PA PR >PAPR0]
C = 1.1
C = 1.2
C = 1.3
1.E-04
C = 1.4
C = 1.5
1.E-05
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Eb/N0 (dB)
1.E -02
1.E -03
1.E -04
10
11
12
PAPR 0 (dB )
Fig. 4. CCDF of the PAPR of the proposed SLM technique (new SLM)
without side information for C = 1.4 and N = 65, 125, 255, and 510
subcarriers. The length of the subvectors is M = 5 symbols and K = 2
symbols are extended in each subvector. For comparison purposes, we also
plot for each value of N the curves obtained with the classical SLM method
(class. SLM) as well as those associated with an OFDM system without any
PAPR reduction (no PAPR reduct.).
Pdf
,
4
(7)
LE GOFF et al.: A NOVEL SELECTED MAPPING TECHNIQUE FOR PAPR REDUCTION IN OFDM SYSTEMS
1779
[2] R. W. Bauml, R. F. H. Fischer, and J. B. Huber, Reducing the peakto-average power ratio of multicarrier modulation by selected mapping,
Electron. Lett., vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 2056-2057, Oct. 1996.
[3] X. Li and L. J. Cimini, Jr., Effect of clipping and filtering on the
performance of OFDM, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 131133, May 1998.
[4] H. Ochiai and H. Imai, Performance of the deliberate clipping with
adaptive symbol selection for strictly band-limited OFDM systems, IEEE
J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2270-2277, Nov. 2000.
[5] H. Ochiai and H. Imai, Performance analysis of deliberately clipped
OFDM signals, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 89-101, Jan.
2002.
[6] B. S. Krongold and D. L. Jones, PAR reduction in OFDM via active
constellation extension, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 258268, Sept. 2003.
[7] S. H. Han, J. M. Cioffi, J. H. Lee, Tone injection with hexagonal
constellation for peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM, IEEE
Commun. Lett., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 646-648, Sept. 2006.
[8] M. Breiling, S. H. Muller-Weinfurtner, and J. B. Huber SLM peak-power
reduction without explicit side information, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol.
5, no. 6, pp. 239-241, June 2001.
[9] A. D. S. Jayalath and C. Tellambura, SLM and PTS peak-power
reduction of OFDM signals without side information, IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2006-2013, Sept. 2005.
[10] N. Chen and G. T. Zhou, Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in
OFDM with blind selected pilot tone modulation, IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2210-2216, Aug. 2006.
[11] M. Russell and G. L. Stuber, Interchannel interference analysis of
OFDM in a mobile environment, in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology
Conf., vol. 2, Chicago, IL, July 1996, pp. 820-824.
[12] C. Tellambura, Computation of the continuous-time PAR of an OFDM
signal with BPSK subcarriers, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 5, no. 5, pp.
185-187, May 2001.