Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Velalar College of Engineering and Technology, TamilNadu, India
2
Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore641014, TamilNadu, India
Abstract
The article reports on comparison of transient heat transfer and fluid flow in two different sensible heat storage devices using
Computational Fluid Dynamics. The candidate heat storage devices considered were cored brick and pebble bed and air was
taken to be the working fluid. Same geometrical, material, porosity and boundary conditions, have been used for both the cored
brick and pebble bed heaters, to compare the axial temperature history and pressure drop. The heat storage system comprises
alumina, either in form of pebbles of diameter 6.5 mm, packed to a length of 0.455m in a 43mm diameter pipe, or cored brick of
43mm diameter and same length with through holes to have the same porosity (0.48) as that of the former. The conditions at inlet,
outlet and lateral surface too have been taken to be same for both the systems. The fluid flow was considered to be incompressible
with k-epsilon model to predict turbulence, and the thermo-physical properties of fluid and solid were assumed to remain
constant. Simulations carried out for an inlet temperature of 465 K for velocities ranging from 2m/s to 5 m/s revealed that
pressure drop in pebble bed to be considerably higher than those in cored brick, while the temperature history exhibited mixed
trends.
Density (kg/m3)
Dissipation rate
T
Turbulent
1. INTRODUCTION
Ever-growing demand for power generation, especially
sourced from environment friendly resources has propelled
research in the area of energy and environment. Many of the
renewable sources of energy are of intermittent in nature,
solar and wind energy for instance, of course differing in
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
424
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
425
4. ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions were made:
5. GOVERNING EQUATIONS
Fig -2: Discretized geometry
Fluid Flow
Continuity:
Momentum:
Heat Transfer
Energy equation:
Convection: Solid Fluid Interface
Name
Material Type
Property
and value
Air
Solid
Fluid
Density (kg/m3)
3970
1.225
775
1006.43
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
426
Thermal conductivity
(W/m K)
36
0.0242
Dynamic
(kg/m-s)
viscosity
1.79 x 10-5
Discretization schemes:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
427
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
428
Fig -7: Effect of air velocity on charging time of pebble bed heater at time (t=300s)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
429
Fig -8: Effect of air velocity on charging time of cored brick heater at time (t=300s)
480
460
440
420
T (K)
400
380
360
2.212 m/s
3.088 m/s
340
5.054 m/s
320
300
0
200
400
600
800
t (s)
1000
1200
1400
1600
Fig -9: Maximum temperature of cored brick heater for various velocities
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
430
465
450
435
420
T (K)
405
390
375
360
2.212 m/s
345
330
3.088 m/s
315
5.054 m/s
300
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
t (s)
Fig -10: Minimum temperature of cored brick heater for various velocities
T (K)
420
400
380
360
Pebble bed
340
Cored Brick
320
300
2400
2160
1920
1680
1440
1200
960
720
480
240
t (s)
Fig -11: Charging time comparison of two storage heaters for velocity v= 2 m/s
Initially, the driving potential of heat transfer was higher for both storage heaters and this driving potential decreases with
increasing of time but pebble bed heater had much low heat transfer driving potential than the cored brick heater. During the
initial charging period, the pebble bed appears to be heated more than its counterpart. However, with the passage of time, it can be
seen that the heating of cored brick accelerates and attains the maximum temperature of 465 K, 15 minutes before than that of
pebble bed storage heater.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
431
465
450
435
420
T (K)
405
390
375
360
3.088 m/s
345
4.222 m/s
5.054 m/s
330
315
300
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
t (s)
Fig -12: Charging time comparison of cored brick heater for various velocities
9. CONCLUSION
The transient thermal and hydrodynamic behaviors of two
storage heater had studied in this research article. The
pressure drop and temperature history of two storage heaters
during charging were discussed for different inlet velocity. It
can be concluded that the higher pressure drop occur in
pebble bed compared to cored brick storage heater for same
porosity while the time taken to attain the maximum
temperature of cored brick heater was much less than pebble
bed heater during charging process. Hence, the cored brick
heater can be considered as a viable alternative to the pebble
bed, when alumina is considered as the storage material.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors express their profound gratitude to the Principal
and Management of Coimbatore Institute of Technology,
Coimbatore, INDIA, for providing the necessary
infrastructure and encouragement.
REFERENCES
[1]. Khare, S., Dell'Amico, M., Knight, C., and McGarry, S.,
2013, Selection of Materials for High Temperature
Sensible Energy Storage, Solar Energy Materials & Solar
Cells 115, pp.114122.
[2]. Menghare, Yogesh M., Jibhakate, Y. M., 2013, Review
on Sensible Heat Storage System Principle, Performance
and Analysis, International Journal of Engineering
Research & Technology, Vol.2, Issue 6, pp. 3432-3435.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
432
BIOGRAPHIES
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 01 | Jan-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
433