11.01.16 PC Final Packet

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov
LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL
COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell
Todd L. Moody, Chair

Trinity Haven Schlottman, Vice Chair
Vicki Quinn
Gus W. Flangas
Glen Trowbridge
Cedric Crear
Sam Cherry
Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable efforts will be
made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation to
attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at 702-229-6301 and
advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.
November 1, 2016
6:00 PM
ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM MILES ESCUIN, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3RD FLOOR,
(702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITYS WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.
NOTICE:
This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:
City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive
ACTIONS:
ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.
ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.
Planning Commission November 1, 2016 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1.
Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.
2.
The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staffs conditions of
approval.
3.
If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staffs condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.
4.
Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.
5.
Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups
of interested parties.
6.
After all objectors input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.
7.
Following the applicants response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.
8.
Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in
for the record unless requested by the Commission.
As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
3.
ROLL CALL
4.
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
5.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.
CONSENT ITEMS:
CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.
ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.
6.
TMP-65809 - TENTATIVE MAP - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - SKYE CANYON PARCEL

2.16 - APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: SECTION 12, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 66-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION on 17.09 acres at the northwest corner
of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive (APN 126-12-000-001), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone,
[L(Residential Low) Skye Canyon Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65788]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
7.
VAR-66741 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO - OWNER: RALPH

SERVIDO FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT CORNER
SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS
II) [DETACHED PATIO COVER] on 0.22 acres located at 7703 Calm Waters Street (APN 125-13-214-019), R-1 (Single
Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66727]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
8.
SUP-66792 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SOUTHERN NEVADA

SIGHTLESS INC. - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved a Special Use
Permit (SUP-61367) FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW 96 PARKING SPACES WHERE
166 SPACES ARE REQUIRED at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue (APN 139-26-201-019), C-V
(Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
9.
SDR-66794 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66792 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: SOUTHERN NEVADA SIGHTLESS INC. - For possible action on a request for a Major
Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-60891) FOR A PROPOSED 3,400 SQUAREFOOT INTERIOR OFFICE ADDITION TO AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND BANQUET FACILITY on
3.00 acres located at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue (APN 139-26-201-019), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward
5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
10.
SUP-66648 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SEUNGHYUK NA - OWNER: RPAI
LAS VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A PROPOSED 2,640 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180 (APN 125-20-710-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [UC-TC
(Urban Center Mixed Use - Town Center) and MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use
Designation],Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64702]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
11.
SUP-66822 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CELEBRITY BRANDS, LLC OWNER: GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT IN A PROPOSED RESTAURANT WITH 6,355 SQUARE
FEET OF INDOOR SEATING AND 204 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING WITH A 141-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A CITY PARK WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 330 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #160
(APN 138-32-615-001), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-66753]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
12.
SDR-66779- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOMERSET

ACADEMY - OWNER: SECTION 12, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review
FOR A PROPOSED 54,000 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY on 5.48 acres on the west
side of the Shaumber Road alignment, approximately 330 feet north of Grand Teton Drive (portion of APN 126-12-000001), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone [PF (Public Facility) Skye Canyon Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-65794]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
13.
SDR-66808 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SIMONCRE CARP
VII, LLC - OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 22, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan
Review FOR A PROPOSED 7,428 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO PARTS (NEW & REBUILT) RETAIL STORE WITH
WAIVERS OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN SETBACK, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND
SCREENING STANDARDS on 2.68 acres at 2100 Fremont Street (APN 139-35-803-015), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66574]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

14.
ABEYANCE - GPA-66496 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.21 acres at the
northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
15.
ABEYANCE - ZON-66497 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-66496 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION]
TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN
125-22-804-001), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
16.
ABEYANCE - VAR-66498 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-66496 AND ZON-66497 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Variance TO ALLOW AN TEN-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 81 FEET IS REQUIRED
on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), U (Undeveloped)
Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)] Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
17.
ABEYANCE - SDR-66499 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-66496, ZON-66497

AND VAR-66498 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,800 SQUARE-FOOT
MEDICAL CLINIC AND MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PERIMETER, AN 11-FOOT BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH
PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE
SUCH IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804001), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)] Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
18.
ABEYANCE - VAR-66443 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS

VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 15-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK
WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 9.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs
125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
19.
ABEYANCE - SUP-66444 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
20.
ABEYANCE - SUP-66445 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443 AND SUP-66444 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A 4,000 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) at the southeast corner of
Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
21.
ABEYANCE - SUP-66446 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443, SUP-66444 AND SUP-66445 PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR A 5,075 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT at the
southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
22.
ABEYANCE - SDR-66447 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-66443, SUP-66444,

SUP-66445 AND SUP-66446 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 100,719 SQUARE-FOOT
SHOPPING CENTER WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW BUILDINGS TO NOT BE ORIENTED TO THE CORNER AND
STREET FRONTAGE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES AND A TWO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED,
TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET
IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW A CAR WASH BAY TO FACE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE SUCH IS NOT
ALLOWED on 9.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and
002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
23.
MOD-66820 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND

ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the
Lone Mountain West Land Use Plan FROM: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) on 5.00 acres on the north side of Buckskin Avenue, approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows
Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-66760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
24.
VAR-66821 - VARIANCE RELATED TO MOD-66820 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A PROPOSED FOUR-STORY, 64-FOOT TALL BUILDING WHERE TWO STORIES AND 35
FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, TO ALLOW A SITE DISTURBANCE OF 44 PERCENT ON SLOPES
GREATER THAN 25 PERCENT WHERE 35 PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM DISTURBANCE ALLOWED, AND TO
ALLOW A 100 PERCENT SITE DISTURBANCE ON SLOPES BETWEEN 15 AND 25 PERCENT WHERE 50
PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM DISTURBANCE ALLOWED on 5.00 acres on the north side of Buckskin Avenue,
approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), PD (Planned Development) Zone [L
(Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation] [PROPOSED: ML (Medium-Low Density
Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-66760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
25.
SDR-66761 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-66820 AND VAR-66821 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 42-UNIT CONDOMINIUM
DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW 16-FOOT RETAINING WALLS WHERE THREE FEET, SIX
INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, AND TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER
ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED on 5.00 acres on the north
side of Buckskin Avenue, approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [L (Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation] PROPOSED: [ML
(Medium-Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-66760]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
26.
VAR-66657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ - For possible action
on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 11 PARKING SPACES WHERE 22 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on
0.50 acres at 3808 Melody Lane (APN 139-19-704-011), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66212].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
27.
SDR-66658 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-66657 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR
A PROPOSED 6,604 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES BUILDING, WITH
WAIVERS OF THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS TO ALLOW 10 FEET ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY
LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND
WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.50 acres at 3808 Melody Lane (APN 139-19704-011), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66212]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
28.
VAR-66689 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD YUDKA - For possible

action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A THREE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED HOME ADDITION on 0.17 acres located at 4609 Del Monte Avenue (APN 162-06213-011), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-66548]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
29.
VAR-66733 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CYNTHIA MOTA - For possible action
on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT REAR AND SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE THREE FEET
IS REQUIRED FOR TWO EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (CLASS II) [SHEDS] AND TO ALLOW
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT ARE NOT AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRINCIPAL
DWELLING UNIT on 0.16 acres located at 1801 Cochran Street (APN 162-02-313-013), R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66589]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
30.
VAR-66818 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TRISHA K. NILSSON-LIGHT AND

SHAWN M. LIGHT - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW FIVE-FOOT SIDE AND REAR
YARD SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 590 SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [SHED] on 0.46 acres at 6205 Newkirk Court (APN 125-26-110-012), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64916]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
31.
WVR-66692 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOUCHSTONE LONE MOUNTAIN,

LLC - For possible action on a request TO ALLOW NO EXTERNAL STREETLIGHTS FOR A PROPOSED FOURLOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.50 acres at the southeast corner of Hickam Avenue and Juliano Road (APN
138-05-801-006), U (Undeveloped) Zone [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation], Ward 4
(Anthony) [PRJ-66677]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
32.
WVR-67096 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:
ROARING FORK MANAGEMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO
STREETLIGHTS ALONG ALPINE RIDGE WAY AND ON THE INTERIOR OF A PROPOSED 22-LOT SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 4.79 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge
Way (APN 126-24-401-016), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-67084]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
33.
SUP-66544 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN STREET

INVESTMENTS III, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED DRIVETHROUGH at 1311 South Main Street (APN 162-03-110-131), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-66201]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
34.
SDR-66545 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66544 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN STREET INVESTMENTS III, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH WITH A WAIVER OF
THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN PARKING LOT SCREENING REQUIREMENTS on 0.46 acres at 1311
South Main Street (APN 162-03-110-131), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66201]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
35.
SUP-66829 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028
FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A TRAILER/RV CAMP OR PARK
WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SITES TO BE LOCATED ZERO FEET FROM A
PUBLIC STREET WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN
BACK-IN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED at the northwest corner of Fremont Street
and 11th Street (APNs 139-35-201-004 and 139-35-211-027), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ66732]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
36.
SUP-66831 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-66829 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAVID
DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY RESIDENCE at the northwest corner of Fremont Street and 11th Street (APNs 139-35201-004 and 139-35-211-027), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66732]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
37.
SDR-66832 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66829 AND SUP-66831 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Major Amendment to previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) FOR THE CONVERSION
OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER INTO A SEVEN-UNIT SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
RESIDENCE AND 16-UNIT TRAILER/RV CAMP OR PARK USE on 1.30 acres at the northwest corner of Fremont
Street and 11th Street (APNs 139-35-201-004 and 139-35-211-027), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-66732]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
38.
SUP-66806 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: ZEUS1 INVESTMENTS,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL
RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 241-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE
WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 1612 South 6th Street (APN 162-03-213-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential)
39.
SUP-66838 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: KAI'S LASH AND FOOT SPA OWNER: WEST SAHARA ASSOCIATES - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 1,350 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE
SEPARATION OF 80 FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
REQUIRED at 6340 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-02-816-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
[PRJ-66634]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
40.
MSP-66826 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WMCV PHASE I, LLC, ET
AL - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) TO
ADD TWO ON-PREMISE WALL SIGNS ON BUILDING 'A', TO ADD SIX ON-PREMISE WALL SIGNS ON THE
PARKING GARAGE, AND TO CHANGE THE LOCATION OF TWO EXISTING ILLUMINATED ON-PREMISE
WALL SIGNS ON BUILDING 'B' WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS OF
THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN PARKWAY CENTER SIGNAGE STANDARDS on 21.81 acres at 455, 475
and 495 South Grand Central Parkway (APNs 139-33-610-014 and 023; and 139-33-511-011), PD (Planned Development)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66783]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
41.
DIR-67066 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS For discussion and possible action on a presentation of the Southern Nevada Sustainable Systems Inventory, All Wards.
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:
42.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 1.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: NOVEMBER 1, 2016
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER
Agenda Item No.: 2.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
Agenda Item No.: 3.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL
Agenda Item No.: 4.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 5.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the
applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and
acted upon at this time.
Agenda Item No.: 6.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TMP-65809 - TENTATIVE MAP - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - SKYE
CANYON PARCEL 2.16 - APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER:
SECTION 12, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 66-LOT
SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION on 17.09 acres at the northwest corner of Eagle Canyon
Avenue and Egan Crest Drive (APN 126-12-000-001), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone,
[L(Residential Low) Skye Canyon Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65788]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
P.C.: FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE:
APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg.
City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2016
DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: NINETY FIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER:
SECTION 12, LLC
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBER
TMP-65809
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
TMP-65803
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED
NOTICES MAILED
N/A
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
N/A
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Conditions Page One
November 1, 2016 - Planning Commission Meeting
TMP-65809 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within four (4)
years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
2.
Approval of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative map (TMP-63803) shall be required, if
approved.
3.
Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming Regulations.
4.
All proposed perimeter and interior walls shall comply with the Skye Canyon R-1 (Single
Family Residential) wall standards.
5.
A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any
combustible structures.
6.
In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R),
or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a
Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all
associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR
is to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,
along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief
description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The
DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field
Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenance
obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said
maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance with
the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded
DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.
7.
All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State Subdivision
Statutes.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
8.
The Parent Final Map for Skye Canyon Phase II, FMP-61563, shall record prior to the
recordation of the Final Map for this site to provide legal access.
9.
Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements to be
privately maintained by the Homeowners Association.
10.
If not already constructed or guaranteed by the master developer, construct half street
improvements on Shaumber Road and Eagle Canyon Avenue including appropriate
overpaving (where legally able) adjacent to this site concurrent with development. Install
all appurtenant underground facilities, if any, adjacent to this site needed for the future
traffic signal system concurrent with development of this site. Extend all required
underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc., located within public rights-ofway, past the boundaries of this site prior to construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or
concrete). Per Condition #17 of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803), if
not already constructed or guaranteed by the master developer, a minimum two lanes of
asphalt pavement on village streets providing the main access to this site and a working
sanitary sewer connection shall be provided prior to a final inspection of any dwelling units
within this Tentative Map.
11.
Per condition of approval #14 of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803),
grant Pedestrian Access Easements for all sidewalks located outside of the public street
right-of-way by adding a note within the Owners Certificate on each Final Map to read,
A minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian walkway easement is hereby granted overlying all
sidewalks located in common areas abutting public streets, where such sidewalks are not
located within public street right-of-way, together with the right of ingress thereto and
egress therefrom these easements.
12.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections. Per condition of approval #19
of the Skye Canyon II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803), landscaping within calculated
Site Visibility Restriction Zones (SVRZs) will be limited in height by the City Traffic
Engineer.
13.
No structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet, shall be allowed within any
Public Sewer Easements. Common Element D must be a Public Sewer Easement to be
privately maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA) with a minimum 12-foot
wide paved access path. A 20-foot Public Sewer Easement to be privately maintained must
be granted where it is centered on the public sewer line located in Common Element B.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Conditions Page Three
14.
Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to
discuss fire requirements for the proposed subdivision. The design and layout of all onsite
private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the Department of Fire
Services. No parking is allowed on one side of stub streets where the curb to curb width is
32 feet unless allowed by the Fire Code.
15.
A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any units
within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,
including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent public
street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building
permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvements
adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls
and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building
permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements
shall be constructed in accordance with the approved Development Agreement.
16.
A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,
submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development of this site.
17.
The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is in
concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or
alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage
improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. No
deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approval
for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the
approval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of
this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot
be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such
deviations. We note that curved sewers are not allowed and do not comply with City
Standards.
18.
Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the Sky Canyon II Parent Tentative
Map (TMP-65803) and any other site related actions.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page One
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a 66-lot single family residential subdivision on 17.09 acres within parcel 2.16
of the Skye Canyon Master Plan Area.
ISSUES
This map request was originally approved at the September 13, 2016 Planning Commission
meeting, but the applicant subsequently appealed the decision to the City Council. The City
Council granted the appeal on October 16, 2016.
The primary changes to the map includes the removal of the interior C Street and
recapturing that area for larger lots at the center of the site, and incrementally reducing the
width of lots 42-46 so that the cumulative gain is one additional lot (from 65 to 66) on the
site.
This 66-lot residential development will be built to Skye Canyon R-1 (Single Family
Residential) standards in accordance with the approved Land Use Plan. Staff recommends
approval of this map request.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is part of the Skye Canyon Master Plan Area, which is governed by a
Development Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of Las Vegas, as well as
the Skye Canyon Development Standards. This map was approved at the September 13, 2016
Planning Commission meeting, but was subsequently appealed by the applicant and heard by
City Council on October 16, 2016. The City Council granted the appeal, and the Planning
Commission will now reconsider the revised map request.
The Skye Canyon Land Use Plan designates the subject property as L (Residential Low), which
allows up to 15 residential units per gross acre with an average of 5.49 units per acre. The
proposed density of 3.86 dwelling units per unit falls within the maximum allowed. The dwelling
units will be constructed to the Skye Canyon R-1 (Single Family Residential) standard, which
call for a single family detached product with a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet. All
proposed lot sizes are greater than 6,435 square feet, which exceeds the district minimums. The
primary changes to the map includes the removal of the interior C Street and recapturing that
area for larger lots at the center of the site, and incrementally reducing the width of lots 42-46 so
that the cumulative gain is one additional lot (from 65 to 66) on the site. The minimum lot width
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Two
for the Kyle R-1 (Single Family Residential) district is 40 feet, and the site exceeds this
requirement. As this site is part of a master plan with its own improvement standards, it is not
subject to Title 19.04 street section requirements; however, it must comply with the applicable
Skye Canyon street sections. The correct street sections have been included on the map in
accordance with the Skye Canyon Village Street and Trail Exhibit.
The submitted east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade greater than two percent
across the site. Per the Skye Canyon Development Standards, retaining walls with a maximum
height of six feet are allowed along the perimeter of the site. Eight-foot retaining walls are shown
along both the east/west and north/south perimeter sections. A condition of approval has been
added to ensure compliance with the applicable Sky Canyon R-1 (Single Family Residential)
wall standards, including wall step backs if necessary.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a Resolution (R-176-2004) adopting guidelines
12/01/04
for development within the Kyle Canyon Gateway area
The City Council approved a request (GPA-9167) to amend a portion of the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land use
designations from PCD (Planned Community Development), SC (Service
01/18/06
Commercial) and PF (Public Facilities) to TND (Traditional Neighborhood
Development) on 1,712 acres generally located north of Grand Teton Drive,
between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request to amend the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways
(MSH-21013)
to
select
the
Northern
Alternative
Freeway/Expressway Alignment for Sheep Mountain Parkway and to remove
05/16/07
the Southern Alternative Freeway/Expressway Alignment from the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DIR-21605) between
Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city of Las Vegas on 1,712 acres at the
southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Moccasin Road for the
05/16/07
development of the Kyle Canyon Master Plan. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval. In a related item, the City Council voted to
approve a Parks Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the
city of Las Vegas. Staff recommended approval.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Three

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-20543) from U
(Undeveloped) [TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development) General Plan
Designation] and R-E (Residence Estates) to T-D (Traditional Development)
05/16/07
on 1,712 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Moccasin
Road. The Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines were
approved as part of this action. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910, thereby adopting the
05/16/07
Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city
of Las Vegas.
The Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the
city of Las Vegas was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The
06/20/07
approved Parks Agreement was recorded together with the Development
Agreement. This is the Effective Date of the Development Agreement.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-22589) of the Kyle
Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines to realign Iron
08/08/07
Mountain Road between Hualapai and Grand Canyon Drive, and to add street
cross sections. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
The City Council approved a parent Tentative Map (TMP-22586) for a 213lot mixed use subdivision on the Community property. The Planning
08/15/07
Commission and staff recommended approval. This map was expunged by
TMP-25492.
08/15/07
TMP-25492.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-21949) 15.56 acres
generally located on the south side of Kyle Canyon Road, approximately
1,030 feet east of Shaumber Road; and a Petition to Annex (ANX-21950)
09/05/07
5.15 acres generally located on the south side of Kyle Canyon Road, east of
Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The effective date of the annexations was 09/14/07.
The City Council approved a request (GPA-20469) to amend the Centennial
Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land use designations from
PCD (Planned Community Development) and SC (Service Commercial) to
TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development) on 7.27 acres on the west side
of Oso Blanca Road, approximately 2,190 feet south of Kyle Canyon Road.
09/19/07
The City Council also approved a Rezoning (ZON-22351) from U
(Undeveloped) [PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan
Designation], C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) to
TD (Traditional Development) on the same 7.27 acres. This action also
updated the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Four

The City Council approved a request (ZON-20475) to establish a Gaming
Enterprise Overlay District on 51.38 acres at the southeast corner of Hualapai
09/19/07
Way and Oso Blanca Road. The City Council also approved a Special Use
Permit (SUP-20478) for a Non-Restricted Gaming use on this site. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Staff completed the first Final Map Technical Review for the Kyle Canyon
Gateway Parent Final Map (FMP-24541) and conducted a workshop pursuant
to Subsection 3.05(c)(ii) of the Development Agreement to discuss comments
with the Master Developer. The Final Map was deemed not to be in
10/23/07
substantial compliance with the approved parent Tentative Map (TMP22586). Staff and the Master Developer agreed to retain the Final Map and
have the Master Developer submit a new Tentative Map that matched the
Final Map. The Final Map would be subject to a subsequent review once the
Tentative Map was approved.
The Planning Commission approved a parent Tentative Map (TMP-25492)
12/20/07
for a 105-lot mixed-use subdivision on the 1,712-acre Community property.
Staff recommended approval.
Planning and Development and Public Works Department staff conditionally
approved a Final Map Technical Review for the Kyle Canyon Gateway Parent
01/31/08
Final Map (FMP-24541). As of 07/06/09, Final Map mylars based on the
current Tentative Map have not been submitted for staff review.
The City Council approved a request (MSH-25695) to amend the Master Plan
of Streets and Highways to rename Horse Drive west of Grand Canyon Drive
to Kyle Heights Parkway; to realign a portion of the Iron Mountain Road
alignment between Horse Drive and the Northern Beltway; to reclassify
various streets as identified by the special design designations adopted as part
of the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines; and to
02/06/08
add or remove various roadway segments. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval. The City Council also approved a Major
Modification (MOD-25875) of the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and
Design Guidelines to amend various street names and to clarify street cross
section drawings within the Community. A subsequent Street Name Change
application will be required prior to issuance of the first residential permit in
the Community. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council tabled a Petition to Vacate a BLM right-of-way grant
generally located north of Grand Teton Drive, south of Moccasin Road,
between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road (VAC-23811). The area to be
vacated was the original alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway. The
02/06/08
Planning Commission and staff had recommended approval. The Petition
cannot record until Section 1 Land, Providence Land, and On-Property
Land are dedicated to the city for creation of the right-of-way for the
northern alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway, pursuant to Subsection
7.05(a)(v) of the Development Agreement.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Five

The City Council approved a required review (DIR-28767) of a development
report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon Development
08/06/08
Agreement. Staff recommended approval. A condition of approval required a
follow-up review on 10/01/08.
Wachovia Bank, National Association, acting as the managing creditor of 41
creditors, foreclosed on the Kyle Canyon property. A new entity called KAG
09/23/08
Property, LLC was formed to assume ownership of the Kyle Canyon
property.
The City Council approved a follow-up required review (DIR-29916) of a
development report pursuant to Subsection 9.01 of the Kyle Canyon
12/03/08
Development Agreement between the city of Las Vegas and Kyle Acquisition
Group, LLC (abeyed from 10/01/08). Staff recommended approval.
Notice of Noncompliance and Opportunity to Cure was sent to KAG
02/02/09
Property, LLC for failure to commence construction of Indian Hills Park prior
to 09/13/08.
The City Council approved the required review (DIR-34955) of a
08/05/09
Development Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-35315) of a
previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-20478) for a proposed Non09/02/09
Restricted Gaming Facility at the southwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and
Hualapai Way alignment. Staff recommended approval.
The Master Developer presented to the city a summary report from Hart
10/02/09
Howerton Strategic Planning Consultants outlining a strategic plan and
recommendations for development of the Kyle Canyon property.
08/04/10
Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request or possible action on a request for
required review (DIR-42369) of a development report as required by
08/17/11
Subsection 9.01 of that certain Development Agreement between the city of
Las Vegas and Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC dated August 8, 2007. Staff
The City Council approved a request to Amend the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways (GPA-41958) to realign Sheep Mountain Parkway between Grand
11/16/11
Teton Drive and Fort Apache Road and delete master planned roadways
within the Kyle Canyon master plan area. Planning Commission and staff
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Six

The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Vacate (VAC-42250)
11/16/11
portions of the Sheep Mountain Parkway right-of-way grant. Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request regarding the amending of the
Development Agreement (DIR-42266) for the Kyle Canyon Development on
approximately 1,662 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
11/16/11
Moccasin Road. Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Development Agreement (Doc. #201206260000001) was recorded on
06/26/12.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-53058) for a 45lot subdivision (Parent Tentative Map) on 1,661.8 acres approximately 1,800
04/08/14
feet north of Horse Drive on the west side of Oso Blanca Road. Staff
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP53700) for a proposed four-pod residential subdivision (Skye Canyon Phase 1
05/08/14
Parent Map) on 163.65 acres at the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive
and Grand Canyon Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-53843)
Bureau of Land Management Right-of-Way Grant Easement generally located
06/10/14
north of the northern alignment of Grand Teton Drive between Hualapai Way
and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-53895) for a
173-lot single-family subdivision (Skye Canyon Parcel 1.2) on 37.99 acres on
06/10/14
the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff
06/10/14
the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Hualapai Way. Staff
06/10/14
the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff
07/08/14
the southeast corner of Horse Drive and Hualapai Way. Staff recommended
approval.
08/06/14
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Seven

The Planning Commission approve a Petition to Vacate (VAC-56656) a fourfoot wide pedestrian access easement generally located approximately 1,461
12/09/14
feet east of the intersection of Hualapai Way and Eagle Canyon Avenue. Staff
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP56855) for a 125-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye Canyon
12/10/14
Parcel 1.3 Phase 1) on 25.49 acres on the north side of Grand Teton Drive,
approximately 1,210 feet west of Grand Canyon Drive. The map recorded on
02/11/15 (Book 148, Page 67).
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP56863) for a 94-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye Canyon Parcel
12/10/14
1.1 Phase 1) on 19.85 acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive and
Skye Park Drive. The map recorded on 02/11/15 (Book 148, Page 65).
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP57264) for an 84-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye Canyon
01/06/15
Parcel 1.3 Phase 2) on 15.41 acres at the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Hualapai Way. The map has yet to record.
01/07/15
1.1 Phase 2) on 15.43 acres at the southeast corner of Horse Drive and
Hualapai Way. The map recorded on 8/17/15
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-55892) to allow deviations from
the Street Naming Guidelines and Street Naming Configuration sections of
the City of Las Vegas Street Naming and Addressing Assignment
01/21/15
Regulations, 2009 Edition on Horse Drive between the US 95 and Iron
Mountain Road, Fort Apache Road between the US 95 and Moccasin Road,
as well as on Hualapai Way from Grand Teton Drive to Moccasin Road,
respectively. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request a Street Name Change (SNC-55060)
from Horse Drive tot: W Skye Canyon Park Drive (between the US 95 and
Iron Mountain Road); from Fort Apache Road to North Skye Canyon Park
01/21/15
Drive (between the US 95 and Moccasin Road); and from Hualapai Way to
Skye Village Road (between Grand Teton Drive and Moccasin Road). The
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review
(FMP-57784) for a 204-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye
02/18/15
Canyon Parcel 1.4 Phase 2) on 33.61 acres on the northwest corner of Grand
Teton Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. The map recorded on 06/02/15.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Eight

The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA- 56951) to
amend the Public Facilities & Building Element of the Las Vegas 2020
03/18/15
Master Plan. This amendment eliminates e the Nevada Energy Substation and
associate corridor within the Kyle Canyon Master Planned Community
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-57816) for the 2nd
04/15/15
amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The Planning
Commission and Staff recommended approval on 03/10/15.
Department of Planning staff approved an administrative site plan
05/04/15
(SDR-58930) for a conceptual review of Skye Canyon parks 1.5, 1.6, and
2.13.
The Planning Commission approved a Parent Tentative Map (TMP-58560)
05/12/15
for a proposed 66-lot mixed use subdivision at the northeast corner of Grand
Teton Drive and Puli Drive. Staff had recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-59826) regarding
the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 2nd amendment to the
07/15/15
Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff and the Planning Commission
had recommend approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-60399) to
allow a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) within a community recreational
09/08/15
facility at the southwest corner of West Skye Canyon Park Dr. and Skye
Village Road. Staff had recommend approval.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-62679) to the Kyle
03/16/16
Canyon Development Standards to amend the Blended Use Design
Guidelines. Staff and the Planning Commission had recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan review for a
05/10/16
265,108 square-foot shopping center at the northeast corner of Skye Park
Drive and West Skye Canyon Park Drive. Staff had recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-63962) for the
07/20/16
3rd amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The Planning
07/20/16
the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 3rd amendment to the
Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff had recommend approval.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved a request for a Tentative
09/13/16
(TMP-65809) for a 65-lot single family residential subdivision on 17.09 acres
at the northwest corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive.
The City Clerk received a request to appeal the Approval by the Planning
Commission on a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-65809) for a 65-lot
09/20/16
single family residential subdivision on 17.09 acres at the northwest corner of
Eagle Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive.
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Nine

The City Council granted an appeal of the Planning Commissions decision to
approve a Tentative Map (TMP-65809) for a 65-lot single family residential
10/19/16
subdivision on 17.09 acres at the northwest corner of Eagle Canyon Avenue
and Egan Crest Drive and remanded the request back to the November 1,
2016 Planning Commission meeting.
Most Recent Change of Ownership

11/07/13
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership for multiple parcels.
Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general map submittal requirements
07/21/16
were discussed.
Field Check
7/30/16
A field check was conducted and the site is undeveloped.
Details of Application Request

Site Area
Gross Acres
16.81
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
Undeveloped
East
Undeveloped
West
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
Existing Zoning District

T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
FS
TMP-65809 [PRJ-65788]
Staff Report Page Ten
Master Plan Areas

Skye Canyon Master Plan
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts
T-D (Traditional Development) District
Other Plans or Special Requirements
Trails (Skye Canyon)
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
FS
TMP-65809
TMP-65809
TMP-65809 - REVISED
TMP-65809 - REVISED
TMP-65809 - REVISED
TMP-65809 - REVISED
TMP-65809 - REVISED
Agenda Item No.: 7.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66741 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO OWNER: RALPH SERVIDO FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [DETACHED
PATIO COVER] on 0.22 acres located at 7703 Calm Waters Street (APN 125-13-214-019), R-1
(Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66727]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 12/21/2016
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)
15
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Petition and Support Postcards
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO - OWNER: RALPH SERVIDO
FAMILY TRUST
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66741
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
250
APPROVALS
15
PROTESTS
22
CS
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-66741 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for
consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
2.
All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and
Safety.
3.
These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted
for building permit.
4.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,
except as modified herein.
CS
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow an existing accessory structure (Class II)
[detached patio cover] with a 10-foot corner side yard setback where 15 feet is the minimum
required in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district at 7703 Calm Waters Street.
ISSUES
The R-1 zoning district requires accessory structures to have a minimum corner side yard
setback of 15 feet. The applicant is proposing a 10-foot corner side yard setback for an
existing detached patio cover.
ANALYSIS
The existing accessory structure is located in the southwest corner of the subject property. While
the applicant fails to meet the corner side yard setback requirement, the existing accessory
structure does meet the setback requirement from the property line shared by the adjacent
landowner. The existing accessory structure is not visible from the street and is buffered by an
existing wall and landscaping. Approval of the applicants request will not negatively affect the
subject site or surrounding area. As such, the variance request is reasonable and staff
recommends approval with conditions.
FINDINGS (VAR-66741)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:
1.
2.
3.
Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.
Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of
property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of
the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
CS
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727]
upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or
resolution.
The applicant has provided sufficient evidence that the need for a setback variance is a unique
situation and that its approval will not pose any nuisance to the subject property or the
surrounding area. The existing accessory structure meets the setback requirement from the
shared property line of the adjacent landowner, and the structure is buffered from the street by an
existing wall and landscaping. Therefore, staff finds that the applicants request is within the
realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
A code enforcement citation (#169687) was issued for an unpermitted
01/04/16
accessory structure. The citation remains unresolved.
04/13/16
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
c. 2003
The existing single-family dwelling was constructed.
Site Area
Net Acres
0.22
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal requirements
09/13/16
and deadlines were discussed.
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff conducted a routine field check and found the site to be well maintained.
CS
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727]
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)

R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
Master Plan Areas

No Applicable Master Plan Area
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width
60 Feet
Min. Setbacks (Accessory Structures)
Side
3 Feet
Corner
15 Feet
3 Feet
Rear
Min. Distance Between Buildings
6 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
Max. Building Height
35 Feet
50% of principal
Max. Size of Accessory Structures
du.
Provided
9,583 SF
66 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
66 Feet
11 Feet
4 Feet
13 Feet
32 %
10 Feet
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
3%
CS
VAR-66741
VAR-66741
VAR-66741
VAR-66741
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO - OWNER: RALPH SERVIDO

FAMILY TRUST
7703 CALM WATERS STREET
09/26/16
VAR-66741 [PRJ-66727] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO - OWNER: RALPH SERVIDO

FAMILY TRUST
7703 CALM WATERS STREET
09/26/16
7 7 7
7b 7 7
7 7 7
A77
b777
77
777
777
7777
777777777777
7777777,777777
77,7777777777
7777777777777
7 7777777777777 7
7777777777 77,7777777
,
77777777777777777
77b7 77 777777777
77777777777777 7
77,77777b7 777 777777
77777 777777777
7777
7,77777777777
,7777
VAR-66741
VAR-66741
VAR-66741
Agenda Item No.: 8.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66792 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
SOUTHERN NEVADA SIGHTLESS INC. - For possible action on a request for a Major
Amendment to a previously approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-61367) FOR AN
ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW 96 PARKING SPACES WHERE 166
SPACES ARE REQUIRED at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue (APN 139-26201-019), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
6. Parking Analysis - SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SOUTHERN NEVADA SIGHTLESS
INC.
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66792
SDR-66794
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-66792
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
229
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
18
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
SUP-66792 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-66794) shall be required.
2.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-61397), (SUP65297) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-60891), (SDR-65298).
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.
6.
SDR-66794 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP66792) shall be required, if approved.
2.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-61397), (SUP65297) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-60891), (SDR-65298).
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

Conditions Page Two
3.
4.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 09/15/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
8.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
Public Works
9.
Concurrent with construction, abandon the existing temporary Individual Sewage Disposal
System serving the building at 1600 Gragson Avenue. All buildings on this site shall
connect to the public sewer system prior to occupancy.
10.
An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must
be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to submittal of any
construction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may
occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
study update.
11.
Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-60891 and
all other applicable site-related actions.
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant has proposed a Major Amendment to approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-60891) and Special Use Permit (SUP-61367) for a proposed 3,400 square-foot expansion
in floor area at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue.
ISSUES
A Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR60891) is required for the proposed 3,400 square-foot expansion to the existing
Warehouse, Office and Banquet facility.
A Major Amendment to a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-61367) is
required for an increase in the number of required parking spaces on-site.
Proposed perimeter landscaping will not be affected by this request.
ANALYSIS
On October 13th, 2015 the Planning Commission approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-60891) and Special Use Permit (SUP-61367). These two entitlements approved a proposed
26,536 square-foot warehouse, office and banquet facility with a waiver to allow a ten-foot
landscape buffer on a portion of the north and east perimeters where fifteen feet is the minimum
required on the subject site. They also approved an alternative parking standard to allow 92
parking spaces where 149 spaces are required for the proposed use. It was established with this
review that the existing banquet facility located on site would remain at is existing size of 3,030
square feet and that no additional Special Use Permit would be required to continue that use
onsite.
On August 9th, 2016 the Planning Commission approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR65298) and Special Use Permit (SUP-65297), which served as a Major Amendment to the
previously approved entitlements. These two entitlements proposed added 5,948 square feet of
space to the proposed warehouse, office and banquet facility resulting in a total of 32,484 square
feet. Additionally, the alternative parking standard was amended to allow 95 parking spaces
where 155 parking spaces are required for the proposed uses on-site.
The applicant has proposed a 3,400 square-foot expansion to the proposed office floor area on
the second floor on the proposed facility, which will now bring the proposed new structure to
35,884 square feet. The applicant has indicated on the submitted plans that the proposed
expansion is the result of a mezzanine being filled in which will result in additional office floor
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

area on the second floor of the building. As the proposed expansion intensifies the parking
requirements on the subject site, a Major Amendment is required for Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-60891) and Special Use Permit (SUP-61367).
Under Title 19.12, the proposed uses would normally require 166 parking spaces. In this case,
the applicants justification letter states that the ITE publication entitled parking Generation
4th Edition was consulted to determine the parking rate for the facility; it also mentioned that the
majority of the clients who use this facility banquet facility will be bussed to the site. The
proposed 96 parking spaces are adequate to accommodate employees, volunteers and visitors to
the campus. Staff supports the number of parking spaces being provided for this user under the
Alternative Parking Standard.
This parcel is currently served by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Civil and
plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow
verification.
This project will continue to have a positive visual effect on the campus and surrounding
neighborhood as well as providing enhanced services for the visually impaired members of the
community. This project is well designed and appropriate for the location. Staff recommends
approval, with conditions.
FINDINGS (SUP-66792)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
The proposed expansion of the Warehouse area remains compatible with the surrounding
land uses. The reduced number of parking spaces provided will not have a negative impact
on the area as most of the clients visiting the site utilize public and/or mass transit.
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.
The site is suitable for the proposed expanded Warehouse, Office and Banquet Facility
uses with the reduced parking.
3.
Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

Primary access to the site is off Bruce Street, a Secondary Collector Street that is designed
to accommodate traffic generated by this project. A secondary access is located on
Gragson Avenue, a Minor Collector Street. This project will not generate additional traffic
than already exists with the campus.
4.
Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.
The approval of an Alternative Parking Standard will not compromise the public health,
safety or welfare.
5.
The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.
The Special Use Permit is being utilized to deviate from the parking requirements found in
Title 19.12; therefore the conditions of the proposed use will be met with the approval of
this application.
FINDINGS (SDR-66794)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;
The proposed building will remain compatible with the surrounding area, as it is part of an
established non-profit center and is adjacent to similar civic and public uses. All new
onsite landscaping, parking, and internal access will enhance or match the existing, which
will remain.
2.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other dulyadopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed improvements to the existing Blind Center Campus are consistent with the
previously approved development and landscaping standards under the C-V (Civic)
development requirements. A Waiver was approved by Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-60891) for the existing landscape buffer widths along the east and a portion of the
north perimeters.
3.
Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

Primary access to the site is off Bruce Street, a Secondary Collector Street that is designed
to accommodate traffic generated by this project. A secondary access is located on
Gragson Avenue, a Minor Collector Street. This project will not generate additional traffic
than already exists with the campus.
4.
Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
The proposed building materials are appropriate for the area and for the City.
5.
Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
The proposed building is designed to update and modernize the campus. The existing site
layout will remain primarily the same, thus retaining an orderly environment that is
compatible with the area.
6.
Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
The proposed building will be subject to building permit review and inspections during the
construction prior to operating. Therefore, appropriate measures will be taken to protect
the public health, safety and general welfare.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (CV-311/09/82
82) for a proposed new building addition to an existing building at 1001
Bruce Street. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved A Site Development Plan Review (CV3-82(1) for a 2,625 square-foot pre-fabricated metal storage building to be
03/12/92
located six feet from the west property line on the southwest corner of Bruce
Street and Gragson Avenue. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-9219) to
change the Future Land Use designation to Commercial, Mixed Use,
Industrial or Public Facilities on various parcels located within the proposed
05/17/06
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan area and within the proposed Redevelopment
Plan expansion area. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]


The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-60891) for a proposed 26,536 square-foot Warehouse, Office
and Banquet Facility with a Waiver to allow a ten-foot landscape buffer on a
portion of the north and east perimeters where fifteen feet is the minimum
required located at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue. Staff
10/13/15
recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP61367) for an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 92 parking spaces where
149 spaces are required for existing Warehouse, Office and Banquet Facility
uses (Blind Center) at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue.
The Planning Department approved a Parcel Map (PMP-61355) for Technical
Review of a one-lot parcel map on 3.02 acres at the southwest corner of
10/28/15
Gragson Avenue and Bruce Street APNs 139-26-201-010 and 011 which were
converted to new APN 139-26-201-019.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Major Amendment (SUP65297) to a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-61367) for an
alternative parking standard to allow 95 parking spaces where 155 spaces are
required for an existing Warehouse, Office and Banquet Facility uses (Blind
Center) at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue.
08/09/16
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Major Amendment (SDR65298) to previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-60891)
for a proposed 5,948 square-foot addition to an existing Warehouse, Office
and Banquet Facility uses (Blind Center) at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600
Gragson Avenue.

01/10/79 and
Deeds were recorded for a change in ownership of the parcels.
01/23/15

A business license (L13-00010) for Liquor Sales at 1600 Gragson Avenue
01/01/51
was issued. The license was marked as out-of-business on 10/01/14.
A business license (G01-02362) for Gaming at 1600 Gragson Avenue was
03/11/09
issued. The license was revoked on 04/01/14.
A Code Enforcement notice (#153276) for non-permitted construction work
04/15/15
and a change in occupancy at 997 North Bruce Street was issued. The case
remains active
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a Major
Amendment to previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR09/14/16
60891) and Special Use Permit (SUP-61367) for a proposed 3,400 square-foot
expansion to the site.
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff visited the site and found no issues with the non-profit operation. The
site is suitable for the proposed building and the surrounding neighborhood.

Site Area
Net Acres
3.02
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Social Service
Provider
Senior Citizen
Apartments
Private Club, Lodge
or Fraternal
Organization
Single Family,
Dwelling
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-V (Civic)
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-V (Civic)
L (Low Density
Residential)
Private Museum
C (Commercial)
R-1 (Single-Family
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Downtown North Land Use Plan
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]


Trails
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.10.020, the following standards are proposed:
Standard
Proposed
Min. Setbacks
Front
55 Feet
Side
40 Feet
Corner
20 Feet
Rear
132 Feet
10 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
28.0 %
40 Feet
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened

Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 110
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
20 Trees
South 78
23 Trees
East 130
12 Trees
15 Trees
West 130
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES
70 Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Trees
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
22 Trees
end of each row of spaces
Provided
Compliance
20 Trees
23 Trees
12 Trees
15 Trees
70 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
5 Trees
N*
JB
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794 [PRJ-66746]


Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
10 Feet
N**
South
8 Feet
8 Feet
Y
East
15 Feet
10 Feet
N**
8 Feet
8 Feet
Y
West
Wall Height
6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
N/A
N/A
* An Exception has been requested with approved Site development Plan Review (SDR-60891)
**A Waiver has been requested with approved Site development Plan Review (SDR-60891)
Street Name
Bruce Street
Gragson Avenue
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Secondary
Collector Street
Minor Collector
Street
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
60
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1 per 300
Office
35,051
117
SF
1 per 1000
Warehouse
17,483
18
SF
Banquet
1 per 100
3,030
31
Facility
SF
166
96
N*
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED
160
6
92
4
Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required
Loading Spaces
3
3
Y
Percent Deviation
42%
*A Special Use Permit for an Alternative Parking Standard has been submitted with this project.
**With approval of the Special Use Permit, the handicap parking is in conformance.
JB
SUP-66792
SUP-66792
A7
bAA
A7
7Ab7
b7
bA7A
A
A7A7A
7A7
7b
7A7A7b
7 7
77777
777777777
7b77A7Abb
7b77A7Abb
Abb7Ab77
Abb7Ab77
bA77777
7A7
A777777777777777777777777777777777777
A777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777
A77
A7
77777777
777777777777777
777777
7777777777 77777777
7A7Ab7
7A7
7b7
77777777
777777777777777777777777
7A77777
7b7
A7AA7
A7A7bA7Ab7A77A77
7Ab777b77777777777777777777777777777777777
7bA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
AA7A777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
Ab77777777777777777777777777777777777
777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7777A777AA7 77777777777777777777777777777777
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
77777777777777777777777777777777777
7777A7777AA7 77777777777777777777777777777777777 7
A77AA7 777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
AbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777AbA7A
7AA77 777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
A77A 7777777777777777777777777777777b7bb7b
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777b7bb7b
Ab777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77777777777777777777777777777777777777777b77A7A
77A7
A7A7
bAA
A
7A7A
A7A
A7A7A
A7A
7A
AAA
bA7
A7
Ab
7AA7
7A7
77bA
7A77 7
b7A7
AbA
77
AbA
AbA
b7
AbA
AbA
AbA
b7A
A77
b77
A77
7777
7777
77A
bA7A
7bA7
7A
7A
AbA
Abb
777

77A
77
7AbA
7A
7b7A77A7
777bA77A
b777b
77bA7
b777b
77bA7
7 7 7
7A7b
AbA
7777
7777
7b7
77A
7Ab7
b77Ab7
A7b777A
7
7
77A77A
77A
A7AAb7Ab
bA777A
77A77
AbA
AbA77
bA
7
77
AbA
777
77A7
77A7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
A7A
b7
A7A7
77A7
77
AbA7
bA7Ab
bA7A7
A7
bAA
A7
7Ab7
b7
bA7A
A
A7A7A
7A7
7b
7A7A7b
7 7
77777
777777777
7b77A7Abb
7b77A7Abb
Abb7Ab77
Abb7Ab77
bA77777
7A77
A777777777777777777777777777777777777
A777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777
A77
A7
77777777
777777777777777
777777
7777777777 77777777
7A7Ab7
7A7
7b7
77777777
777777777777777777777777
7A77777
7b7
A7AA7
A7A7bA7Ab7A77A77
7Ab777b77777777777777777777777777777777777
7bA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
AA7A777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
Ab77777777777777777777777777777777777
777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7777A777AA7 77777777777777777777777777777777
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
77777777777777777777777777777777777
7777A7777AA7 77777777777777777777777777777777777 7
A77AA7 777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
AbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777AbA7A
7AA77 777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
A77A 7777777777777777777777777777777b7bb7b
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777b7bb7b
Ab777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77777777777777777777777777777777777777777b77A7A
77A7
A7A7
bAA
A
7A7A
A7A
A7A7A
A7A
7A
AAA
bA7
A7
Ab
7AA7
7A7
77bA
7A77 7
b7A7
77
AbA
AbA
b7
AbA
AbA
AbA
b7A
A77
b77
A77
7777
7777
77A
bA7A
7bA7
7A
7A
AbA
Abb
777

77A
77
7AbA
7A
7b7A77A7
777bA77A
b777b
77bA7
b777b
77bA7
7 7 7
7A7b7
AbA
7777
7777
7b7
77A
7Ab7
b77Ab7
A7b777A
7
7
77A77A
77A
A7AAb7Ab
bA777A
77A77
AbA
AbA77
bA
7
77
AbA
777
77A7
77A7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
A7A
b7
A7A7
77A
77
AbA7
bA7Ab
bA7A7
77
77
77
A777
77
77
7A7
7A7
A7A7A
A7
A7A7
bAA
A
77A7
A7A
7Ab7
b7
bA7A
7A7A
A7A
A7
bAA
A7
7A
AAA
bA7
A7
Ab
A7A7A
7A
7b
7A7A7b
bA77777
AbA7A
7A77 7
b7A7
7A777A777
7AbA777A77A7
77bA
77AbA
77AbA
7AbA77A777
A77
b7
AbA7AA
AbA7
7 7
AA
AA
bb
b7A
bA
bb
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
AA
A7A
bb
bb
AA
7 7 7
AA
7A
777
7AbA
77
77
77
A777
77
77
7A7
7A7
A7A7A
A7
A7A7
bAA
A
77A7
A7A
7Ab7
b7
bA7A
7A7A
A7A
A7
bAA
A7
7A
AAA
bA7
A7
Ab
A7A7A
7A
7b
7A7A7b
7 7
bA77777
AbA7A7
7A77 7
b7A7
7A777A777
7AbA777A77A7
77bA
77AbA
77AbA
7AbA77A777
A77
b7
AbA7AA
AbA7
AA
AA
bb
b7A
bA
bb
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
AA
A7A
bb
bb
AA
7 7 7
AA
7A
777
7AbA
7
7A7
7A
A7A7
7A
bA77777
7A
7A7A
7bA
7AA
7
7AA
7
7AA
7bA
7AA
7AA
7AA
7
7AA
7
7A7A
7bA
7AA
7
7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
7 77 7
777
7bA
7A7A
7AA
7AA
7AA
7AA
7
7A7
7A
A7A7
7A
bA77777
7A7
7A7A
7bA
7AA
7
7AA
7
7AA
7bA
7AA
7AA
7AA
7
7AA
7
7A7A
7bA
7AA
7
7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
7 77 7
777
7bA
7A7A
7AA
7AA
7AA
7AA
bA77777
-7A777
AA
AA
77
777
777
777
777
A
7A
777
77
77
b
77
b
77
77
bA
77
77
A
b
7 77 7
A7Ab
7A
b
77
bA
77
b
A77A7
7b7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
A7Ab
A7
A7A7
A7bbA7b77
77777777
77A7777
77777bbA7A7A7bA777777
77A7AA777A
77b777777
bbAb7b77b7
7A
777
bA7A
bbAb7b77b7
bA77777
-7A777
7
777777bA
A7AA
7b7
A7
77
bA
77
77
Abb7b7
Ab7
b
77
777
bA7
Ab
7 77 7
b
b
bb
7b7
b7Abb
77
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
A7bbA7b77
77777777
77A7777
77777bbA7A7A7bA777777
77A7AA777A
77b777777
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
SUP-66792 [PRJ-66746] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-66794 - APPLICANT/OWNER:

SOUTHERN NEVADA SIGHTLESS INC.
1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16

1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16

1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16

1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16

1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16

1600 GRAGSON AVENUE
09/26/16
77
b777
77
777
777
7
7
A777b77
7
77777b7777777777777
7777777777777777777
777777777777b7777777
77777777777777
77b777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777777777777
777777777b777777
7777777777777
77777b77777777
77b777777797777777777
777777777777777
77777777777777
77777
77777777777777
77777777777777
7777777777
7 777777b777777
7 7777777777
7 7777777777
7 A7777777
7777777
777777b
7 7777777777
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
77777777777777
7777777
77777
7 77777777
777'777
77777777
77777777
7 7777777777
77777777
7777777
7777777
7 77777)77
77777777
7 777777777
7
777777777777777777
77777777777777777
777777777
77777b77777777777
77777777777777777
777777777777777777777
7777777777A77777777
77
777777777777777
7777777777
77b7777777777777777
77777777777777777b7
7777777777777777777
77777777777777777
777777777
777AA
7Abb7
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
SUP-66792 and SDR-66794
Agenda Item No.: 9.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66794 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66792 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SOUTHERN NEVADA SIGHTLESS INC. - For possible
action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-60891) FOR A PROPOSED 3,400 SQUARE-FOOT INTERIOR OFFICE
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND BANQUET FACILITY on 3.00
acres located at 997 North Bruce Street and 1600 Gragson Avenue (APN 139-26-201-019), C-V
(Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
Consistent with the Citys

sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-66794
SDR-66794
SDR 66794
Southern Nevada Sightless, Inc.
1001 N Bruce Street

Proposed 3.4 thousand square foot expansion of a previously approved 32.484 thousand square foot expansion of an existing 19.68
thousand square foot use.
Existing Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
AM Peak Hour
11.03
GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF]
19.68
PM Peak Hour
1.56
1.49
217
31
29
Previously Approved Use

AM Peak Hour
11.03
32.484
PM Peak Hour
1.56
1.49
358
51
48
Proposed Use
AM Peak Hour
11.03
3.4
PM Peak Hour
1.56
1.49
38
5
5
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
11.03
PM Peak Hour
55.564
1.56
1.49
613
87
82
Existing traffic on nearby streets:

Bruce Street
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes)
11,912
953
Washington Avenue
16,024
1,282
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Bruce Street
Washington Avenue
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity

33,800
33,800
This project will add approximately 38 trips per day on Gragson Ave., Bruce St. and Washington Ave. Currently, Bruce is at
about 35 percent of capacity and Washington is at about 47 percent of capacity. With this project, Bruce is expected to
remain unchanged and Washington to be at about 48 percent of capacity. Counts are not available for Gragson in this
vicinity, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 5 additional cars, or about one every twelve
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
Agenda Item No.: 10.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66648 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SEUNGHYUK
NA - OWNER: RPAI LAS VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A
PROPOSED 2,640 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180
(APN 125-20-710-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [UC-TC (Urban Center Mixed Use - Town
Center) and MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use
Designation],Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64702]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Postcards
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PPLICANT: SEUNGHYUK NA - OWNER: RPAI LAS VEGAS
MONTECITO, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66648
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
774
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
36
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use.
2.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review [Z-007698(34)].
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.
7.
Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.
8.
This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Vegas
Municipal Code.
9.
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use located at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180, which is presently vacant.
ISSUES
A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the T-C (Town Center)

zoning district [UC-TC (Urban Center Mixed-Use Town Center) and MS-TC (Main Street
Town Center) Special Land Use Designation] with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
ANALYSIS
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use. The subject property is a part of an established Shopping Center which is
currently zoned as T-C (Town Center) with a special land use designation of UC-TC (Urban
Center Mixed-Use Town Center) and MS-TC (Main Street Town Center). The proposed
suite location is currently vacant, but was previously occupied with the same use. On January 8,
2013, the Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-47545). A business license
for Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment was marked out of business on August 31, 2015.
Pursuant to Title 19.16.110(P)(2)(a), the Special Use Permit expired March 3, 2016
A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the T-C (Town Center) zoning
district within the special land use designation of UC-TC (Urban Center Mixed-Use Town
Center) with an approval of a Special Use Permit. Additionally, the following analysis is
required:
The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is defined as An Establishment whose
license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers only for
consumption on the premise where the same is sold. The proposed use meets the definition
because it will be in conjunction with the Restaurant.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Except as otherwise provide, any beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment (hereinafter
establishment) must be more than 400 feet from any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
There are no Church/House of Worships, Schools, Individual Care Centers licensed for
more than 12 children or City Parks within 400 feet of the subject site.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Regulation 3 below, the distances referred to in
Regulation 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall
be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and
does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site parking
and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in
Regulation 1.
There are no Church/House of Worship, School, Individual Care Centers licensed for
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in
size, the minimum distances referred to in Regulation 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
Not applicable, since the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use will be
located in a parcel that is not 80 acres of size. The Clark County Assessors Office lists
the subject property at 20.78 acres.
4. The minimum distance requirements in Regulation 1 do not apply to:
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a

hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor
space.
There are no Church/House of Worship, School, Individual Care Centers licensed for
5. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC
Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in LVMC
Chapter 6.50 if approved.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment will be located within an established
Shopping Center and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with
existing surrounding land uses and future surrounding land uses. There are no protected uses
located within 400 feet of the subject property. Staff recommends approval of this request with
conditions. If this application is denied the proposed restaurant cannot serve beer and wine on
premise.
1.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment will be located within an
established Shopping Center and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses and future surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is an existing Shopping Center; therefore, the site is physically suitable for
the type and intensity of the proposed land use.
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
3.
Site access is provided from Durango Drive, a 120-foot Primary Arterial, Deer Springs
Way, an 80-foot Secondary Arterial, Riley Street, an 80-foot Collector as designated in the
Town Center Development Standards Manual, and Rome Boulevard, a 60-foot local street.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of this proposed Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health,
safety and general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and
to licensing restrictions.
5.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use complies with all applicable
conditions per Title 19.12.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) from U
(Undeveloped), R-E (Residence Estates), R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development 7 Units per Acre), R-PD11 (Residential Planned Development
11 Units per Acre), R-PD13 (Residential Planned Development 13 Units
12/07/98
per Acre), R-PD18 (Residential Planned Development 18 Units per Acre),
R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial), C-V (Civic), and PD (Planned Development) Zones,
to T-C (Town Center) as part of a larger request on 1,468 acres. The Planning
The Department of Planning administratively approved Site Development
Plan Review [Z-0076-98(3J4)] for a proposed 344,120 square-foot Shopping
08/23/02
Center on 39.50 acres, located adjacent to the southeast corner of El Capitan
Way and Deer Springs Road.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP47545) for a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use within a proposed
01/08/13
2,640 square-foot restaurant 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180. Staff
A Code Enforcement case (#162400) was processed for a banner on the
01/14/16
building at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180. The case was resolved on
02/03/16.
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]

10/01/15

A building permit (#04001825) was issued for a Shell Building for certificate
01/27/04
of completion for Pad 1 at 6640 North Durango Drive. The permit was
finalized on 12/09/04.
A building permit (#04021714) was issued for a non-work certificate of
12/06/04
occupancy for a General Retail Store at 6640 North Durango Drive. The
permit was finalized on 12/10/04.
A building permit (#93457) was issued for a Tenant Improvement at 6640
07/27/07
North Durango Drive, Suite #180. The permit was finalized 11/20/07.
A business license (R09-92299) was processed for a Restaurant at 6640 North
12/20/12
Durango Drive, Suite #180. This license was marked out of business on
08/31/15.
A business license (L09-00346) was issued for a Beer/Wine/Cooler On Sale
02/06/13
at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #180. This license was marked out of
business on 08/31/15.
A building permit (#312369) was issued for a Wall Sign at 6640 North
03/01/16
Durango Drive, Suite #180. The permit has yet been finalized.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant. The applicant is
proposing a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use at 6640 North
Durango Drive, Suite #180. The previous use had a similar use and was
marked out of business as of 08/31/15. The applicant is proposing to reestablish the use at the same location. The subject property is located within
08/30/16
Town Center and subject to Town Center Development Standards for the
proposed use. The Town Center Land Use table specifies that the Beer/Wine
Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use Town Center) and MS-TC (Main Street Town Center) with an
approved Special Use Permit application.
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff conducted as field check on the subject site. The site is located within
the established and well maintained Shopping Center.

Site Area
Net Acres
20.78
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Shopping Center
North
Hospital
South
Interstate 215
East
Single Family,
Detached
Convenience Store
(with Fuel Pumps)
West
General Retail Store

Undeveloped
Master Plan Areas

Town Center Master Plan
Montecito Town Center
T-C (Town Center) District
Planned or Special
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center) and MS-TC
(Main Street Mixed-Use
- Town Center)
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center) and MS-TC
(Main Street Mixed-Use
- Town Center)
Right-of-Way
MS-TC (Main Street
Mixed-Use Town
Center)
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
EC-TC (Employment
Center Town Center)
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)
Right-of-Way
T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)
U (Undeveloped)
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
RG
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702]

Trails
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Durango Drive
Town Center
Parkway Arterial
Deer Springs Way
Riley Street
Rome Boulevard
Town Center
Secondary Arterial
Town Center
Collector
Local
Governing Document
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual
Town Center
Manual
Town Center
Manual
N/A
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
120
80
80
60
N/A
Pursuant to Town Center Development Standards and Title 19.12, the following parking
standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
306,448 SF
1:250 SF
1,226
Center
1,226
1,621
Y
1,201
25
1575
46
Y
RG
SUP-66648
SUP-66648
SUP-66648
SUP-66648
SUP-66648
SUP-66648
SUP-66648 - REVISED
SUP-66648 - REVISED
SUP-66648 [PRJ-64702] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: SEUNGHYUK NA - OWNER: RPAI LAS
VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC
6640 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE, SUITE #180
09/26/16
SUP-66648

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66822 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CELEBRITY
BRANDS, LLC - OWNER: GREAT WASH PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT IN A
PROPOSED RESTAURANT WITH 6,355 SQUARE FEET OF INDOOR SEATING AND 204
SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING WITH A 141-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A CITY PARK WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 330 South Rampart Boulevard,
Suite #160 (APN 138-32-615-001), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ66753]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CELEBRITY BRANDS, LLC - OWNER: GREAT
WASH PARK, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66822
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
804
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
33
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.04.010 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Municipal Code.
8.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit for a Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale
Establishment for a proposed restaurant to be located at 330 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#160, within an existing Mixed-Use Development. While a Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale
Establishment is a conditional use in the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District, a Special
Use Permit is required when the proposed location cannot meet the required distance separation
from a City Park. The proposed location of the Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment use is
approximately 141 feet from a City Park.
ISSUES
A Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment is allowed as a Conditional Use in the C-2

(General Commercial) zoning district. A Special Use Permit with a waiver is required for a
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment when the use is within 400 feet of a City Park.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting to establish a Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment in a
proposed restaurant. The subject site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial) and is located within
an existing Mixed-Use Development. The proposed restaurant will have 6,355 square feet of
indoor seating and 204 square feet of outdoor seating. The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use is a conditional use within the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. The
applicant must obtain a Special Use Permit with a waiver because the subject site is located
within 400 feet of a City Park. The proposed site is located approximately 141 feet from Angel
Park. Staff supports the request as the Mixed-Use Development already contains similar
alcohol-related uses, including multiple taverns and a restaurant with service bar, which operate
in a compatible and harmonious manner with the surrounding uses. The addition of the proposed
use will not negatively affect the area.
Per Title 19, the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is defined as An establishment
whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers only for
consumption on the premises where the same is sold. The proposed use meets this definition as
the applicant intends to operate a restaurant with the option to sell alcoholic beverages to be
consumed on site. No additional parking is necessary beyond what is required for the principal
use on the site. The proposed restaurant will be subject to the parking requirements of the
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770).
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
The Conditional Use Requirements for this use include:

1. Except as otherwise provided, any beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment (hereinafter
establishment) must be more than 400 feet from any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park. The proposed site
does not meet this requirement as it is located 141 feet from a City Park.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Regulation 3 below, the distances referred to in
Regulation 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall
be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and
does not include the property line of: a) Any leasehold parcel; or b) Any parcel which
lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site parking and which has been
created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Regulation 1. The requirements
of this condition were used to determine the distance of the City Park from the proposed
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment.
size, the minimum distances referred to in Regulation 1 shall be measured in a straight
line: a) From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
obstacles; or b) In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the
establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles. N/A
4. The minimum distance requirements in Regulation 1 do not apply to: a) An
establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or b) A proposed
establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space. N/A
Chapter 6.50. A condition of approval has been placed on the Special Use to ensure this
requirement is met.
The proposed use is located within 141 feet of a city park to the northeast where a 400-foot
minimum distance separation is required. As noted in the applicants justification letter, there are
two physical barriers, including a fence and drainage channel that block off direct pedestrian and
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
vehicular access from the park to the mixed-use development. The request to allow a 141-foot
distance separation from a City Park use represents a 65% reduction from the required 400-foot
separation required by Title 19. Staff has determined that since there is no reasonable means of
access from the City Park to the Mixed-Use development within the 141-foot distance
separation, the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale establishment will have adequate separation
from the existing City Park land use. Staff has added a condition of approval requiring the
business conform to all provisions of LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to running a restaurant
and alcohol license. It has been determined that the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale
Establishment use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land
uses, therefore, staff is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate for the
surrounding area.
1.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler, On-Sale Establishment use can be conducted in a
manner that is harmonious and compatible with neighboring commercial and residential
uses within the existing Mixed-Use Development.
2.
The subject site is located within an existing Mixed-Use Development that is physically
suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
The subject site has adequate access from Rampart Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial
and Alta Drive, an 80-foot Major Collector, as classified by the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways.
4.
General Plan.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health, safety or
welfare of the general public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
5.
Other than the required distance separation, all code requirements of Title 19.12 are being
met.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-5653) from U (Undeveloped)
[GC (General Commercial) General Plan Designation] to C-2 (General
03/02/05
Commercial) on 30.21 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard and
Alta Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-10773) to allow 3,955 parking
spaces where 4,961 spaces are required for a proposed Mixed-Use
Development on 28.69 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard
and Alta Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Staff
recommended denial.
04/19/06
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770)
for a 10-story Mixed Use Development consisting of 699,000 net square feet
of commercial space and 340 residential units on 28.69 acres at the northeast
corner of Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Review of Condition (ROC-21668) to modify
Condition Number 9 of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR
10770) to allow a four-foot landscape buffer along the south property line
06/06/07
where eight feet is required adjacent to Building #9 within an approved
Mixed-Use development on 28.69 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart
Boulevard and Alta Drive. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-20197) for a one07/12/07
lot mixed use subdivision on 28.62 acres at the northeast corner of Rampart
Boulevard and Alta Drive. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP41576) for a proposed 6,013 square-foot Supper Club within a 28.44-acre
06/14/11
Mixed-Use Development with a Waiver to allow a distance separation of 141
feet from a City park where 400 feet is required at 450 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite 120. Staff recommended approval.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]

A Final Map (FMP-41668) for a one-lot commercial subdivision on 28.43
06/29/11
acres at the northeast corner of Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive was
recorded.
Licensing Enforcement processed a case (#123279) for returned mail for an
12/17/12
out-of-business notice at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The case
was resolved on 12/19/12.
Planning Staff approved a Minor Amendment of Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-47628) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR
01/24/13
10770) for minor revisions to building facades and floor plans on buildings 5,
11, 15 and 16 of an existing mixed use development on 28.43 acres at 330,
340, 350 and 360 South Rampart Boulevard.
Licensing Enforcement processed a case (#128300) for a pre-license
05/12/13
inspection at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The case was resolved
on 07/16/13.
Licensing Enforcement processed a case (#133554) for returned mail for an
09/19/13
out-of-business notice at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The case
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Major Amendment (SDR52089) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) to
reduce the southeast side yard setback from 115 feet to 65 feet and to reduce
01/14/14
the number of residential units from 340 to 300 of an existing Mixed-Use
Development at 330, 340, 350, and 360 South Rampart Boulevard. Staff
Licensing Enforcement processed a case (#138285) for an alcohol license
02/26/14
inactive status request at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The case
Staff administratively approved a request for a Minor Amendment (SDR54397) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) to
remove building 13, incorporate building 14 into building 15, decrease total
07/08/14
net floor area from 793,925 square feet to 775,890 square feet and allow
minor faade improvements at an existing Mixed-Use Development at 280,
320, and 340 South Rampart Boulevard.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit request (SUP54786) to allow a beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment in conjunction with
an existing 2,161 square-foot restaurant with a 65 square-foot outdoor patio
08/12/14
with a waiver to allow a 141-foot distance separation from a city park where
400 feet is the minimum required at 420 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#150.
Licensing Enforcement processed a case (#144625) for the issuance of a 9008/19/14
day temporary license issued at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The
case was resolved on 02/26/15.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]

Staff administratively approved a request for a Minor Amendment (SDR55833) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) for
09/11/14
minor revisions to building facades on buildings 5 and 11 of an existing
Mixed-Use Development at 330 and 350 South Rampart Boulevard.
Staff administratively approved a request for a Minor Amendment (SDR58923) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10770) for
minor revisions for the removal of building 18, minor elevation and floor plan
05/11/15
revisions to building 15, a six-story, 82,325 net square-foot Hotel in building
12 where 103,093 net square feet of office, retail and restaurant in four stories
was approved, and minor modifications to the site at the northeast corner of
Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit request (SUP61054) to allow a proposed 2,381 square-foot restaurant with service bar with
10/13/15
a 2,575 square-foot outdoor seating area with a waiver to allow a 141-foot
distance separation from a city park where 400 feet is required at 400 South
Rampart Boulevard, Suite #165.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit request (SUP63484) to allow a proposed 6,013 square-foot liquor establishment (tavern)
04/12/16
within a 28.43 acre mixed-use development with a waiver to allow a 141-foot
distance separation from a city park where 1500 feet is the minimum required
at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #120.

01/16/04

A building permit (#262884) was issued for an interior demo at 450 South
06/17/14
Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The permit is currently open.
A building permit (#263471) was issued for a tenant improvement at 450
06/30/14
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The permit received its final inspection
on 08/07/14.
A building permit (#264937) was issued for a kitchen hood extinguishing
07/15/14
system at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The permit received its
final inspection on 08/07/14.
A building permit (#265465) was issued for a fire alarm system at 450 South
07/22/14
Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The permit received its final inspection on
08/07/14.
A business license (G62-05328) was issued for a Restaurant at 450 South
08/03/14
Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The license expired as of 08/16/16.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]

A business license (P62-00155) was issued for a Restaurant with Alcohol at
08/03/14
450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The license expired as of 04/16/15.
A business license (L63-00025) was issued for a Restaurant with Alcohol at
08/03/14
450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The license is active.
A business license (G62-09625) was issued for Amusement Machines at 450
12/17/14
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The license expired as of 06/16/16.
A business license (P63-00126) was issued for a Gaming, Restricted
04/27/15
Establishment with 5 machines at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120.
The license expired as of 04/16/15.
A business license (X63-00017) was issued for a Gaming, Restricted
04/27/15
Establishment with 5 machines at 450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120.
The license is active.
A building permit (#312927) was issued for a restaurant with service bar at
04/18/16
400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 220. The permit received its final
inspection on 08/23/16.
A business license (P64-00108) was issued for a tavern at 400 South Rampart
05/05/16
Boulevard, Suite 165. The license is active.
07/12/16
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The permit received its final inspection
on 09/07/16.
A business license (G64-06379) was issued for a Restaurant with Alcohol at
08/30/16
450 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 120. The license is active.
A business license (P64-00229) was issued for a tavern at 450 South Rampart
08/30/16
Boulevard, Suite 120. The license is active.
09/14/16
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 180. The permit was still active as of
10/05/16.
09/20/16
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 110. The permit was still active as of
10/05/16.
Staff conducted a routine pre-application meeting where the submittal
09/14/16
requirements for a Special Use Permit were discussed.
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff conducted a routine field check where a building currently under

construction was observed within an existing Mixed-Use development.

Site Area
Net Acres
28.43
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Mixed-Use
Development
Commercial
Recreation and
Amusement
(Outdoor) (Golf
Course with Club
House)
Undeveloped
Single Family,
Detached
Hotel/Gaming
Establishment, Nonrestricted
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)

C-2 General Commercial
PR-OS
(Park/Recreation/Open
Space)
C-V Civic
SC (Service
Commercial)
P-D Planned Development
L (Low up to 5.49)
R-1 Single Family

Residential
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 Limited Commercial
Master Plan Areas

Trails Pedestrian Path
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
CS
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753]
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Rampart Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Alta Drive
Major Collector
Governing Document
Master Plan of Streets
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
80
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Mixed-Use parking model
Mixed-Use
as originally approved
3,319
through SDR-10770
3,319
3,434
Y
3,275
44
3,374
60
Y
CS
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822
SUP-66822 [PRJ-66753] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: CELEBRITY BRANDS, LLC - OWNER:
GREAT WASH PARK, LLC
330 SOUTH RAMPART BOULEVARD, SUITE #160
09/26/16
7 7
b777777
777
7 77
777777777 7777
7
b 7777777 777 77777
7777777777777 777
7777777777777 77
b 777777777777
77 7777A7777777777777
77 77
7777777777777777
777777777777777 7777
77777777777777
777777A777 77777777
7777 777777777777
b77 777777777
77777777 77777777
777777777 777777777
777777 77777777777
77 77A77 777777 777777777
777 77>77 777777777
777
77
7
7
7777
SUP-66822

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66779- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
SOMERSET ACADEMY - OWNER: SECTION 12, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 54,000 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY on 5.48 acres on the west side of the Shaumber Road
alignment, approximately 330 feet north of Grand Teton Drive (portion of APN 126-12-000001), T-D (Traditional Development) Zone [PF (Public Facility) Skye Canyon Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65794]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SOMERSET ACADEMY - OWNER: SECTION
12, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SDR-66779
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
789
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
35
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and building elevations, date
stamped 09/20/16, and landscape plan date stamped 10/13/16, except as amended by
conditions herein.
3.
Safety.
4.
Along Shaumber Road, a 25-foot common lot consisting of a 12-foot landscape buffer, 8foot sidewalk and 5-foot landscaped amenity zone back of curb, consistent with Section H
of the Streets and Trail Section Exhibit of the Skye Canyon Development Standards, shall
be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on the site. 24inch box trees and five-gallon shrubs acceptable to the Master Developer shall be installed
at a spacing of no less than every 20 feet on-center and four shrubs per tree.
5.
6.
7.
Public Works
8.
The Parent Phase Final Map for Skye Canyon Phase II, FMP-61563, shall record to provide
legal access to this site prior to the issuance of permits for this site.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
Conditions Page Two
9.
If not already constructed or guaranteed by the master developer, construct half street
improvements on Shaumber Road including appropriate overpaving (where legally able)
adjacent to this site concurrent with development. Install all appurtenant underground
facilities, if any, adjacent to this site needed for the future traffic signal system concurrent
with development of this site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical,
telephone, etc., located within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to
construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete). Per condition #17 of the Skye Canyon
II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803), if not already constructed or guaranteed by the
master developer, a minimum two lanes of asphalt pavement on village streets providing
the main access to this site and a working sanitary sewer connection shall be provided prior
to a final inspection for building permits on this site.
10.
Prior to the issuance of any permits for this site, dedicate appropriate right-of-way for a
parking lane acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer on Shaumber Road adjacent to this
site, and construct such parking lane concurrent with development of the site.
11.
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility. The design and layout of all
onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the Department of
Fire Services.
12.
Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side of
all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with
development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk on the
public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated
on-site with a handicap ramp.
13.
development access drives and abutting street intersections.
14.
Prior to the issuance of any permits for this site, the property owner must contact the
Special Improvement District Section of the Department of Public Works (702-229-2136)
and sign a notarized affidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot assessment of all lots
that will be created through a Final Map for this site. The City shall prepare an
apportionment report following recordation of the Final Map and this apportionment report
must be signed by the property owner prior to the release of any building permits for this
site.
15.
Prior to operating as a school, construct school zone flashers on Shaumber Road meeting
the approval of the City Traffic Engineer unless specifically not required in the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
16.
There shall be an administrative review 60 days after the school has opened to insure
compliance with the approved Traffic Impact Analysis as it relates to the school pick-up
and drop-off plan and the overall school traffic operations. Corrections for any noncompliance must be completed by the applicant within 60 days of written notice from the
City.
17.
An update to the previously approved Skye Canyon Master Traffic Impact Analysis must
be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permits or the submittal of any construction drawings, whichever
may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved update to the Traffic
Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. Phased compliance will be allowed if
recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. No recommendation of the
approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or
eliminate any condition of approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City
Council on the development of this site.
18.
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or
submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve
all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this
site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility
improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
19.
Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the Skye Canyon
II Parent Tentative Map (TMP-65803) and all other applicable site-related actions.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a 54,000 square-foot Private School, Primary on 5.48 acres on the west side of
the Shaumber Road alignment, approximately 330 feet north of Grand Teton Drive.
ISSUES
The Skye Canyon Development standards identify private schools as a permitted use on
parcels designated as Kyle PF (Public Facilities). Staff recommends approval of the Site
Development Plan Review request.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is designated as Kyle PF (Public Facility) and is adjacent to Kyle ML (MediumLow). When adjacent to residentially designated parcels, the Skye Canyon Development
Standards require that development on Kyle PF (Public Facility) parcels adhere to the C-V (Civic)
zoning standards outlined in Title 19.10.020. Title 19.10.020 states that development adjacent to
residential must adhere to the height standards of Title19.06.060, the landscape buffer standards of
19.08.040(F), and the parking standards of LVMC 19.08.110. The site meets all applicable
development standards as required by Title 19.10.020.
The site plan depicts a 54,000 square-foot Private School, Primary on the west side of the
Shaumber Road alignment, approximately 330 feet north of Grand Teton Drive. Site access is
provided via a drive from Shumber Road and an interior circular drive facilitates student drop-off
and pick-up. The parking is located at the northern portion of the site, and 137 parking spaces have
been provided where 135 are required. The building meets all applicable setback requirements
and is located generally at the center of the subject parcel. A sports field, sports court, and play
areas are located within the southern portion of the site.
The landscape plan depicts landscape buffer areas along the north, south and west property lines
that exceed the minimums required by the landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08.040. The site
provides parking lot landscaping in excess of the landscape parking requirements of Title
19.08.110. Trees depicted on the landscape plan consist of ten different species of 24-inch box
trees and a number of one and five-gallon shrubs. Along the east property line, the Sky Canyon
Development Standards require the installation of streetscape improvements that are consistent
with Detail H of the Sky Canyon Street and Trail Section Exhibit. A 12-foot landscape buffer,
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
eight-foot sidewalk and five-foot landscaped amenity zone back of curb is required within a 25foot common lot. The landscape plan indicates that the streetscape will be installed by others, and
a condition of approval has been included to ensure that the proper streetscape treatment is
installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on the site.
The building elevations depict a 34-foot tall building with a painted/textured plaster finish and
metal panel and stone veneer accents. The floor plan depicts 44 classrooms with associated
administrative and faculty areas.
1.

The subject site meets all applicable Skye Canyon and Title 19 development standards;
therefore, the site is compatible with adjacent development and development in the area.
2.
With conformance with the included conditions of approval, the proposal will be
consistent with all Skye Canyon and Title 19 development standards.
3.

Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood
traffic.
4.
The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and the City.
5.

FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
The building elevations and design characteristics are not unsightly or obnoxious in
appearance, and are harmonious and compatible with development in the area
6.
general welfare.
The site will be subject to regular inspections and will therefore not compromise the
publics health, safety or general welfare.
The City Council approved a Resolution (R-176-2004) adopting guidelines
12/01/04
for development within the Kyle Canyon Gateway area
The City Council approved a request (GPA-9167) to amend a portion of the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land use
designations from PCD (Planned Community Development), SC (Service
01/18/06
Commercial) and PF (Public Facilities) to TND (Traditional Neighborhood
Development) on 1,712 acres generally located north of Grand Teton Drive,
between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission and
The City Council approved a request to amend the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways
(MSH-21013)
to
select
the
Northern
Alternative
Freeway/Expressway Alignment for Sheep Mountain Parkway and to remove
05/16/07
the Southern Alternative Freeway/Expressway Alignment from the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DIR-21605) between
Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city of Las Vegas on 1,712 acres at the
southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Moccasin Road for the
05/16/07
development of the Kyle Canyon Master Plan. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval. In a related item, the City Council voted to
approve a Parks Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the
city of Las Vegas. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-20543) from U
(Undeveloped) [TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development) General Plan
Designation] and R-E (Residence Estates) to T-D (Traditional Development)
05/16/07
on 1,712 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Moccasin
Road. The Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines were
approved as part of this action. The Planning Commission and staff
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910, thereby adopting the
05/16/07
Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the city
of Las Vegas.
The Development Agreement between Kyle Acquisition Group, LLC and the
city of Las Vegas was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The
06/20/07
approved Parks Agreement was recorded together with the Development
Agreement. This is the Effective Date of the Development Agreement.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-22589) of the Kyle
Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines to realign Iron
08/08/07
Mountain Road between Hualapai and Grand Canyon Drive, and to add street
cross sections. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
8/15/07
TMP-25492.
08/15/07
TMP-25492.
generally located on the south side of Kyle Canyon Road, approximately
1,030 feet east of Shaumber Road; and a Petition to Annex (ANX-21950)
09/05/07
5.15 acres generally located on the south side of Kyle Canyon Road, east of
Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The effective date of the annexations was 09/14/07.
The City Council approved a request (GPA-20469) to amend the Centennial
Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan to change land use designations from
PCD (Planned Community Development) and SC (Service Commercial) to
TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development) on 7.27 acres on the west side
of Oso Blanca Road, approximately 2,190 feet south of Kyle Canyon Road.
09/19/07
The City Council also approved a Rezoning (ZON-22351) from U
(Undeveloped) [PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan
Designation], C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) to
TD (Traditional Development) on the same 7.27 acres. This action also
updated the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request (ZON-20475) to establish a Gaming
Enterprise Overlay District on 51.38 acres at the southeast corner of Hualapai
09/19/07
Way and Oso Blanca Road. The City Council also approved a Special Use
Permit (SUP-20478) for a Non-Restricted Gaming use on this site. The
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

Staff completed the first Final Map Technical Review for the Kyle Canyon
Gateway Parent Final Map (FMP-24541) and conducted a workshop pursuant
to Subsection 3.05(c)(ii) of the Development Agreement to discuss comments
with the Master Developer. The Final Map was deemed not to be in
10/23/07
substantial compliance with the approved parent Tentative Map (TMP22586). Staff and the Master Developer agreed to retain the Final Map and
have the Master Developer submit a new Tentative Map that matched the
Final Map. The Final Map would be subject to a subsequent review once the
Tentative Map was approved.
The Planning Commission approved a parent Tentative Map (TMP-25492)
12/20/07
for a 105-lot mixed-use subdivision on the 1,712-acre Community property.
Staff recommended approval.
Planning and Development and Public Works Department staff conditionally
approved a Final Map Technical Review for the Kyle Canyon Gateway Parent
01/31/08
Final Map (FMP-24541). As of 07/06/09, Final Map mylars based on the
current Tentative Map have not been submitted for staff review.
The City Council approved a request (MSH-25695) to amend the Master Plan
of Streets and Highways to rename Horse Drive west of Grand Canyon Drive
to Kyle Heights Parkway; to realign a portion of the Iron Mountain Road
alignment between Horse Drive and the Northern Beltway; to reclassify
various streets as identified by the special design designations adopted as part
of the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and Design Guidelines; and to
02/06/08
add or remove various roadway segments. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval. The City Council also approved a Major
Modification (MOD-25875) of the Kyle Canyon Development Standards and
Design Guidelines to amend various street names and to clarify street cross
section drawings within the Community. A subsequent Street Name Change
application will be required prior to issuance of the first residential permit in
the Community. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council tabled a Petition to Vacate a BLM right-of-way grant
generally located north of Grand Teton Drive, south of Moccasin Road,
between Puli Road and Fort Apache Road (VAC-23811). The area to be
vacated was the original alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway. The
02/06/08
Planning Commission and staff had recommended approval. The Petition
cannot record until Section 1 Land, Providence Land, and On-Property
Land are dedicated to the city for creation of the right-of-way for the
northern alignment of Sheep Mountain Parkway, pursuant to Subsection
7.05(a)(v) of the Development Agreement.
08/06/08
Agreement. Staff recommended approval. A condition of approval required a
follow-up review on 10/01/08.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

Wachovia Bank, National Association, acting as the managing creditor of 41
creditors, foreclosed on the Kyle Canyon property. A new entity called KAG
09/23/08
Property, LLC was formed to assume ownership of the Kyle Canyon
property.
The City Council approved a follow-up required review (DIR-29916) of a
12/03/08
Development Agreement between the city of Las Vegas and Kyle Acquisition
Group, LLC (abeyed from 10/01/08). Staff recommended approval.
Notice of Noncompliance and Opportunity to Cure was sent to KAG
02/02/09
Property, LLC for failure to commence construction of Indian Hills Park prior
to 09/13/08.
The City Council approved the required review (DIR-34955) of a
08/05/09
Development Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
The Master Developer presented to the city a summary report from Hart
10/02/09
Howerton Strategic Planning Consultants outlining a strategic plan and
recommendations for development of the Kyle Canyon property.
08/04/10
Agreement. Staff recommended approval.
08/17/11
The City Council approved a request to Amend the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways (GPA-41958) to realign Sheep Mountain Parkway between Grand
11/16/11
Teton Drive and Fort Apache Road and delete master planned roadways
within the Kyle Canyon master plan area. Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Vacate (VAC-42250)
11/16/11
portions of the Sheep Mountain Parkway right-of-way grant. Planning
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

The City Council approved a request regarding the amending of the
Development Agreement (DIR-42266) for the Kyle Canyon Development on
approximately 1,662 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
11/16/11
Moccasin Road. Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Development Agreement (Doc. #201206260000001) was recorded on
06/26/12.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-53058) for a 45lot subdivision (Parent Tentative Map) on 1,661.8 acres approximately 1,800
04/08/14
feet north of Horse Drive on the west side of Oso Blanca Road. Staff
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP53700) for a proposed four-pod residential subdivision (Skye Canyon Phase 1
05/08/14
Parent Map) on 163.65 acres at the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive
and Grand Canyon Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-53843)
Bureau of Land Management Right-of-Way Grant Easement generally located
06/10/14
north of the northern alignment of Grand Teton Drive between Hualapai Way
and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff recommended approval.
06/10/14
the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff
06/10/14
the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Hualapai Way. Staff
06/10/14
the northwest corner of Grand Teton Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff
07/08/14
the southeast corner of Horse Drive and Hualapai Way. Staff recommended
approval.
08/06/14
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

The Planning Commission approve a Petition to Vacate (VAC-56656) a fourfoot wide pedestrian access easement generally located approximately 1,461
12/09/14
feet east of the intersection of Hualapai Way and Eagle Canyon Avenue. Staff
12/10/14
Parcel 1.3 Phase 1) on 25.49 acres on the north side of Grand Teton Drive,
approximately 1,210 feet west of Grand Canyon Drive. The map recorded on
02/11/15 (Book 148, Page 67).
12/10/14
1.1 Phase 1) on 19.85 acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive and
Skye Park Drive. The map recorded on 02/11/15 (Book 148, Page 65).
City staff issued an action letter for a Final Map Technical Review (FMP57264) for an 84-lot single-family residential subdivision (Skye Canyon
01/06/15
Parcel 1.3 Phase 2) on 15.41 acres at the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Hualapai Way. The map has yet to record.
01/07/15
1.1 Phase 2) on 15.43 acres at the southeast corner of Horse Drive and
Hualapai Way. The map recorded on 8/17/15
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-55892) to allow deviations from
the Street Naming Guidelines and Street Naming Configuration sections of
the City of Las Vegas Street Naming and Addressing Assignment
01/21/15
Regulations, 2009 Edition on Horse Drive between the US 95 and Iron
Mountain Road, Fort Apache Road between the US 95 and Moccasin Road,
as well as on Hualapai Way from Grand Teton Drive to Moccasin Road,
respectively. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request a Street Name Change (SNC-55060)
from Horse Drive tot: W Skye Canyon Park Dr (between the US 95 and Iron
Mountain Road); from Fort Apache Road to N Skye Canyon Park Dr
01/21/15
(between the US 95 and Moccasin Road); and from Hualapai Way to Skye
Village Road (between Grand Teton Drive and Moccasin Road). The
02/18/15
Parcel 1.4 Phase 2) on 33.61 acres on the northwest corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Grand Canyon Drive. The map recorded on 06/02/15.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA- 56951) to
amend the Public Facilities & Building Element of the Las Vegas 2020
03/18/15
Master Plan. This amendment eliminates e the Nevada Energy Substation and
associate corridor within the Kyle Canyon Master Planned Community
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-57816) for the 2nd
04/15/15
amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The Planning
Department of Planning staff approved an administrative site plan (SDR05/04/15
58930) for a conceptual review of Skye Canyon parks 1.5, 1.6, and 2.13.
05/12/15
the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 2nd amendment to the
07/15/15
Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff and the Planning Commission
had recommend approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-60399) to
allow a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) within a community recreational
09/08/15
facility at the southwest corner of West Skye Canyon Park Dr. and Skye
Village Road. Staff had recommend approval.
The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-62679) to the Kyle
03/16/16
Canyon Development Standards to amend the Blended Use Design
Guidelines. Staff and the Planning Commission had recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan review for a
05/10/16
265,108 square-foot shopping center at the northeast corner of Skye Park
Drive and West Skye Canyon Park Drive. Staff had recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Directors Business Item (DIR-63962) for the
07/20/16
3rd amendment to the Kyle Canyon Development agreement. The Planning
07/20/16
the adoption of a parks agreement accompanying the 3rd amendment to the
Sky Canyon development agreement. Staff had recommend approval.
09/13/16
09/13/16
proposed 102-lot residential subdivision at the southeast corner of Eagle
Canyon Avenue and Shaumber Road. Staff had recommended approval.
09/13/16
proposed 65-lot residential subdivision at the northwest corner of Eagle
Canyon Avenue and Egan Crest Drive. Staff had recommended approval.
10/04/16
The Phase I Vacation (VAC-42250) of BLM Grant N-77772 was recorded.
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]

11/07/13
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership for multiple parcels
A pre-application meeting was held and general submittal requirements were
6/15/2016
discussed, as well as the need for the Phase I recordation of the Sheep
Mountain Parkway Vacation.
Field Check
08/31/16

Site Area
Net Acres
5.48
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
Undeveloped
East
Undeveloped
West
Undeveloped
Master Plan Areas

Skye Canyon Master Plan
Planned or Special
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)
TND (Traditional
Neighborhood
Development)

T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
T-D (Traditional
Development)
Compliance
Y
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
Staff Report Page Eleven

T-D (Traditional Development) District
Compliance
Y

Trails
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to Skye Canyon Development Standards and Title 19.10, the following standards
apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front
20 feet
76 Feet
Y
Side
5 feet
133 Feet
Y
15 feet
45 Feet
Y
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
14%
Y
35 Feet
34 Feet
Y
Screened, Gated, w/ Screened,
a Roof or Trellis
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
Y
a Roof or
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Y
Pursuant to the Skye Canyon Development Standards and Title 19.10, the following standards
apply:
Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
19 Trees
19 Trees
Y
South
17 Trees
17 Trees
Y
East
30 Trees
37 Trees
Y
34 Trees
34 Trees
Y
West
100 Trees
107 Trees
Y
Parking Area Trees
23 Trees
47 Trees
Y
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
Staff Report Page Twelve

Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Min. Zone Width
North
8 Feet
South
8 Feet
East
15 Feet
8 Feet
West
Wall Height
Street Name
North Shaumber
Road
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Major Collector
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Provided
Compliance
10 Feet
10 Feet
25 Feet
10 Feet
6 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
N/A*
N/A
*Street has not been constructed
Streetscape Standards
Required
Skye Canyon Cross Section H
12-foot landscape buffer,

8-foot sidewalk and 5foot landscaped amenity
zone back of curb within
a 25-foot common lot.
Provided
12-foot landscape
buffer, 8-foot sidewalk
and 5-foot landscaped
amenity zone back of
curb within a 25-foot
common lot.
Compliance
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Primary
3 spaces
44
School,
per class
132
classrooms
Private
room
FS
SDR-66779 [PRJ-65794]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor
Area or
Use
Number of
Units
Required
Provided
Compliance
Parking
Parking
Parking
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
1 space per
10
Individual
20 children
individuals
Care Center
plus one staff
3
and 1 per
(Day Care)
member
staff
member
135
Y
130
5
132
5
Y
FS
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779 - REVISED
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779
SDR-66779 [PRJ-64794] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: SOMERSET ACADEMY OWNER: SECTION 12, LLC
WEST SIDE OF THE SHAUMBER ROAD ALIGNMENT, NORTH OF GRAND TETON DRIVE
09/26/16
SDR-66779
7 7
b777
777
777
7777
777
7b77
b7
7b777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777b777777
7777777777777b
77777A777777
777777777777
7
7b777
777777777

777)77
)
SDR-66779

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66808 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
SIMONCRE CARP VII, LLC - OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 22, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 7,428 SQUARE-FOOT
AUTO PARTS (NEW & REBUILT) RETAIL STORE WITH WAIVERS OF THE
DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN SETBACK, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND
SCREENING STANDARDS on 2.68 acres at 2100 Fremont Street (APN 139-35-803-015), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66574]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SIMONCRE CARP VII, LLC - OWNER: MARY
BARTSAS 22, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SDR-66808
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
263
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
36
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan Parking Lot Screening standards is
hereby approved, to allow no parking lot screen fence.
4.
A Waiver from Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan setback standards is hereby
approved, to allow zero percent of the first story faade to align with the front property
line.
5.
A Waiver from Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan Architectural Design Standards is
hereby approved, to allow no arcades, awnings, or canopies on the ground floor faade.
6.
An Exception from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to provide seven landscape islands and
seven 24-inch box trees where eleven landscape islands with eleven 24-inch box trees are
required..
7.
Bumpers or tire stops shall be provided for all parking stalls heading into a sidewalk,
building, and/or landscape area in accordance with the Downtown Centennial Plan parking
lot standards.
8.
The Trash Enclosure shall be screened in accordance with Title 19.08.040(E)(4).
9.
All Mechanical Equipment shall be screened in accordance with the Downtown Centennial
Plan.
10.
No installation work shall be permitted.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
Conditions Page Two
11.
No dismantling, re-manufacturing or rebuilding shall be permitted.
12.
A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall include the following
changes from the conceptual landscape plan: four, five-gallon shrubs for every required 24inch box tree.
13.
Safety.
14.
15.
16.
Public Works
17.
Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to
this site, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards
concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent
with development of this site.
18.
All private improvements and landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not
create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access drives and
abutting street intersections
19.
Contact the City Traffic Engineers Office at 702-229-6327 to coordinate the development
of this project with the Sidewalk Infill, Area 2B project, and any other public
improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City
Traffic Engineer.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
20.
Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for
all driveways or other private improvements in the East Charleston Boulevard and Fremont
Street public rights-of-way adjacent to this site prior to constructing any improvements
within NDOT jurisdiction.
21.
improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood
Drainage
22.
Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the Charleston/Eastern Tentative
Map (TMP-65447) and any other site related actions.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 7,428 square-foot Auto
Parts (New & Rebuilt) store on an undeveloped portion of an existing 2.68-acre parcel located at
2100 Fremont Street.
ISSUES
Per the Downtown Centennial Plan threshold requirements the proposed 7,428 squarefoot Auto Parts (New & Rebuilt) store meets the requirement for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR).
Waivers of the Downtown Centennial Plan are required for setback, architectural design,
and parking lot screening standards. Staff supports this request.
An Exception is required to provide seven landscape islands and seven 24-inch box trees
where eleven landscape islands with eleven 24-inch box trees are required. Staff supports
this request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant has proposed to develop an Auto Parts (New & Rebuilt) store on a portion of a
2.68 acre lot located at 2100 Fremont Street within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan
East Village District. The portion of the lot proposed for development is a 0.69 acre portion of
the overall 2.68 acre parcel. The subject site is adjacent to Charleston Boulevard, in the
southwest corner of the overall site. The zoning designation of the subject site is C-2 (General
Commercial), which allows the proposed Auto Parts (New & Rebuilt) store as a conditional land
use.
The Minimum Conditional Use Requirements for this use include:
Requirement 1:
If an installation service is offered, the service shall be restricted to the

installation of auto accessories and minor parts only, including stereos, car
alarms, other accessories, batteries, windshield wipers, hoses, fuses, lights,
radios and similar minor elements, and excludes engine, transmission and
differential service, repair or installation.
As indicated by the applicant in the justification letter, no installation
services will be offered at this location. A Condition of Approval has been
added to ensure compliance.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
Requirement 2:
All installation work shall be done within a completely enclosed building.

The floor plan submitted with this application does not demonstrate
service bays where installation services could be provided. In addition, the
applicant has indicated in the justification letter that installation services
will not be provided at this location. A Condition of Approval has been
added to ensure compliance.
Requirement 3:
No dismantling, re-manufacturing or rebuilding shall be permitted.

A Condition of Approval has been added to ensure compliance with this
condition.
Per the Downtown Centennial Plan threshold requirements, the development of a new principal
structure on-site requires a Site Development Plan Review (SDR). Since the Downtown
Centennial Plan streetscape standard will not be implemented due to existing conditions, a signed
Covenant Running with the Land will be required for all future streetscape and civil
improvements because of the partial block frontage. The applicant has also requested an
Exception to provide seven landscape islands and seven 24-inch box trees where eleven
landscape islands with eleven 24-inch box trees are required. The deficiency occurs with the
requirement of a tree at the end of each row of parking spaces. One row of parking spaces ends at
the trash enclosure, which does not allow room for a landscape island with a tree; while the
remaining three rows of parking spaces terminate at sidewalk and handicap pathways. Staff is
supporting this request.
The northern portion of the site adjacent to Fremont Street is currently developed, with a vacant
building located on this portion of the site. The proposed building will be located on the
southeast portion of the site adjacent to Charleston Boulevard. The proposed structure is 21 feet
tall with a corniced roof line. The majority of the building elevation is finished with concrete
masonry unit (CMU) that will be finished in contrasting neutral colors such as latte and
portabello. The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow no arcades, awnings, or canopies on
the ground floor faade; to not align the first story faade with the front property line; and to not
provide the required parking lot screening (fence) as required by the Downtown Centennial Plan.
Staff finds these Waiver request to be minimal and will not negatively affect the surrounding
area.
The wall signs depicted as part of this application are not a part of the Site Development Plan
Review, and will be reviewed separately as part of the building permit review process for a wall
sign.
The proposed floor plan depicts an open sales floor area with a back-of-house area for back
stock. The back-of-house area also contains two restrooms and an office for employees. The
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
proposed floor plan does not depict an area for installation of auto parts, and the applicant has
indicated in the justification letter that there will not be installation activities at this location. One
of the Conditions of Approval for an Auto Parts (New & Rebuilt) use is for all installation work
to be performed within an enclosed building. Since this condition is unable to be satisfied by the
proposed configuration of the building, a Condition of Approval has been added prohibiting the
ability to install automotive parts at this location, ensuring compliance with this condition.
The landscape plan demonstrates a 15-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Charleston
Boulevard, along the south perimeter of the subject site; and a 10-foot landscape buffer along a
portion of the west perimeter, being mindful of the existing power easement also located on the
west perimeter of the subject site. The proposed landscaping buffers and interior parking lot area
provide 24-inch box Velvet Mesquite trees with Texas Ranger shrubs. The Downtown
Centennial Plan requires four, five-gallon shrubs for every required 24-inch box tree. The
applicant has proposed 15 Velvet Mesquite trees with 39 Texas Ranger shrubs. A Condition of
Approval has been added to ensure the appropriate amount of shrubs (60) are installed.
The subject site is located on the periphery of the Downtown Centennial Plan East Village
district, in an area that can accommodate more traditional site design that brings development
away from the street frontage. The subject site is currently accessed by Fremont Street from the
north and Charleston Boulevard from the south, which are both classified as Primary Arterial
streets by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. In a report prepared by the Department of
Public Works, Traffic Division, the proposed project would produce approximately 460 trips per
day on Fremont Street, Eastern Avenue, and Charleston Boulevard. Currently, Fremont Street is
at approximately 35 percent of capacity, Eastern is at approximately 67 percent of capacity, and
Charleston Boulevard is at approximately 82 percent of capacity. Based on Peak Hour use, the
proposed development would add approximately 44 additional vehicles, or approximately three
vehicles every four minutes.
The applicant has requested Waivers of the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan setback and
permanent parking lot screening standards to allow the ground level faade to not align with the
front property line and to allow no parking lot screening fence where such is required. Staff has
determined the proposed land use has met the minimum Conditional Use Requirements set forth
by Title 19.12, and that the requested Waivers will have minimal negative impact to
development surrounding the area and that the proposed development is appropriate for this
portion of the Downtown Centennial Plan; therefore, staff recommends approval of this
application with conditions.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
1.

The proposed commercial development is located within the Downtown Centennial Plan
East Village District and will serve as a retail use that is complementary to the other retail,
restaurant, and general personal service type uses in the neighborhood and is the type of
land use that is encouraged in the Downtown Centennial Plan.
2.
This project is consistent with the General Plan and the uses allowed in the Downtown
Centennial Plan. However, it is not consistent with the building setback and parking lot
screening standards in the Downtown Centennial Plan.
3.

Site access is currently provided from Fremont Street and Charleston Boulevard, which are
Primary Arterial streets as designated in the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. These
streets are sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the proposed use. Once
completed, the proposed project would only have access from Charleston Boulevard.
4.
The building materials proposed include EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finish System),
which provides an insulated, water-resistant finish; CMU (Concrete Masonry Unit) with a
split face finish; and a pre-engineered building sheet metal roofing system. Velvet
Mesquite trees, Texas Ranger shrubbery, and three-quarter inch size gravel ground cover
has been proposed for the landscape areas. These are appropriate building and landscape
materials for the area and the City.
5.

The proposed building elevations have been designed with articulated roof lines, and
contrasting colors and materials to prevent blank and expressionless walls. These
architectural features create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
6.
general welfare.
The proposed development is subject to building permit reviews during the permitting
phase, as well as physical site inspections during construction; therefore, appropriate
measures will be taken to protect the health, safety and general welfare.
The Board of Zoning Administrators approved a request for a Variance (V03/02/99
0005-99) to allow a proposed wireless communication tower five feet from
the side property line where ten feet is required at 2110 Fremont Street.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0008-98)
for a proposed 75-foot tall monopole cellular communication tower and
04/12/99
equipment pad at 2110 Fremont Street. The Planning Commission
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review [U-0008-99(1)]
of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0008-99) which allows a 75-foot tall
06/07/00
monopole cellular communications tower and equipment pad at 2110 Fremont
Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
12/05/01
for a proposed Supper Club at 2100 Fremont Street. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
The City Council pulled a Required One Year Review (RQR-1346) of an
04/02/03
approved Special Use Permit (U-0133-01) for a proposed Supper Club (on
Fremont) at 2100 Fremont Street.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-5802) for
03/02/05
a proposed Supper Club at 2100 Fremont Street. The Planning Commission
and Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission struck a request for a Required One-Year Review
(RQR-13440) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-5802) which allowed
06/22/06
a Supper Club at 2100 Fremont Street. Staff recommended denial of the
request.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#54562) for non-permitted banners
06/19/07
on site at 2100 Fremont Street. The case was resolved on 06/21/07.
The Planning Department denied a request for an Administrative Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-22045) to allow a proposed 10-foot
06/28/07
extension and co-location of antennas on an existing 60-foot Wireless
Communication Facility, Non-Stealth at 2110 Fremont Street.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]

The Planning Department approved a request for an Administrative Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-22771) to allow a proposed co-location of
07/26/07
antennas on an existing 60-foot Wireless Communication Facility, NonStealth at 2110 Fremont Street.
Development Plan Review (SDR-24969) to allow a proposed co-location of
11/08/07
antennas on an existing 73-foot tall Wireless Communications Facility, NonStealth at 2110 Fremont Street.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#63292) for temporary and
03/11/08
window signs at 2100 Fremont Street. The case was resolved on 04/03/08.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#63370) for temporary and
03/12/08
window signs at 2100 Fremont Street. The case was resolved on 04/03/08.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#80383) for an RV parked on
07/31/09
vacant property with electrical cords running to building at 2100 Fremont
Street. The case was resolved on 08/11/09.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA37467) from MXU (Mixed Use) to C (Commercial) at 2100 Fremont Street.
The Planning Commission and Staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
05/19/10
(SDR-37470) for a proposed 90,595 square-foot Shopping Center with
Waivers of the Downtown Centennial Plan setback standards and Title 19
building placement standards at the southwest and northwest corners of
Fremont Street and Eastern Avenue
Development Plan Review (SDR-40499) to install three (3) panel antennas,
02/08/11
one (1) COVP, and three (3) RF modules at the 42'-10" centerline of an
existing 70-foot tall Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design
(Monopole) located at 2110 Fremont Street.
Development Plan Review (SDR-41358) to remove three (3) existing
06/14/11
antennas and install six (6) new antennas at the 60-foot centerline of an
existing 70-foot tall Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design
(Monopole) at 2100 Fremont Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-43119)
10/19/11
for a Non-Conforming Tavern at 2100 Fremont Street. Staff recommended
denial of the request.
of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-37470) for a
proposed 90,595 square-foot Shopping Center with Waivers of the Downtown
06/06/12
Centennial Plan setback standards and Title 19 building placement standards
at the southwest and northwest corners of Fremont Street and Eastern Avenue.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]

Development Plan Review (SDR-47532) to remove six existing antennas and
11/29/12
install three new antennas and nine radio remote heads at the 72-foot
centerline of an existing 73-foot Wireless Communication Facility, NonStealth Design (Monopole) at 2100 Fremont Street.
of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-37470) for a
proposed 90,595 square-foot Shopping Center with Waivers of the Downtown
07/02/14
Centennial Plan setback standards and title 19 building placement standards at
the southwest and northwest corners of Fremont Street and Eastern Avenue.
Staff recommended approval of the request. This extension of time expired on
05/19/16.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP08/09/16
65447) for a one-lot commercial subdivision on 3.28 acres at the southwest
corner of Fremont Street and Eastern Avenue. Staff recommended approval.
(SDR-64855) for a proposed 2,065 square-foot restaurant with a drive08/17/16
through with Waivers of the Downtown Centennial Plan setback and parking
lot screening standards located at 2100 Fremont Street. The Planning
10/31/05
A building permit (#184649) was issued for a service upgrade (electrical) for
03/31/11
the cell tower at 2100 Fremont Street. The permit received its final inspection
on 04/25/11.
A building permit (#185720) was issued to remove three antennas and replace
with six antennas (electrical), and to install an outdoor equipment cabinet at
07/11/11
2100 Fremont Street. The permit received its final inspection on 04/25/11.
The permit remains open.
A demolition permit (#201027) was issued to remove the block wall, patio
11/21/11
cover, and concrete at 2100 Fremont Street. The permit remains open.
A building permit (#201274) was issued for a masonry wall at 2100 Fremont
12/01/11
Street. The permit remains open.
A building permit (#223976) was issued for to remove six existing antennas
and install six new, upgraded antennas; to upgrade breaker, and three hybrid
12/10/12
cables at 2100 Fremont Street. The permit received its final inspection on
04/02/13.
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]

A building permit (#225341) was issued for to remove six existing antennas
and install three new antennas, install six combiners, install three hybrid
12/11/12
cables, to retrofit existing cabinet, and install one new junction box at 2100
Fremont Street. The permit received its final inspection on 12/03/15.
A building permit (#251418) was issued to install three new antennas and a
02/12/14
new cabinet at 2100 Fremont Street. The permit received its final inspection
on 12/08/14.
A pre-application meeting was held with staff where the submittal
08/31/16
requirements for a Site Development Plan Review were discussed.
Field Check
09/26/16
During a routine field check performed by staff, staff observed a vacant

building adjacent to Fremont Street, with the portion of the site adjacent to
Charleston being vacant and undeveloped.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.68
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Vacant/Undeveloped
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Vacant
Hotel, Motel or
Hotel Suites
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
Vacant/Undeveloped
Restaurant
Truck Rental
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial)
C (Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan East Village
Live/Work Overlay District
Trails
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Downtown Redevelopment Area
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan East Village District, the following standards
apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size
N/A
Min. Lot Width
N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front
70% of Front Faade Align w/Property Line
86 Feet
N*
Side
None
10 Feet
Y
Corner
N/A
N/A
N/A
None
58 Feet
Y
Rear
Min. Distance
Between Buildings
N/A
Max. Lot Coverage
N/A
N/A
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or Trellis
Conditioned
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Conditioned
Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan East Village District, the following standards
apply:
Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
N/A
5 Trees
South
N/A
N/A
East
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Trees
West
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]

Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
8 Trees
Parking Area Trees
11 Trees
7 Trees
N*
Min. Zone Width
North
N/A
15 Feet
South
N/A
N/A
East
N/A
N/A
N/A
8 Feet
West
Wall Height
N/A
*An Exception has been requested to allow seven (7) parking lot trees where eleven (11) are
required.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Charleston
Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Fremont Street
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
& Highways
& Highways
Required
Five-foot wide amenity zone
10-foot wide sidewalk
Downtown Centennial Plan 36-inch box trees at 15 to 20 feet
intervals along Charleston
Boulevard and Fremont Street.
*A covenant running with the land will be required to obtain the
future improvements.
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
90
Provided
Zero-foot
Five- Feet
Compliance
N*
N*
0 Trees (existing)
N*
property owners consent for
NE
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574]
Parking Requirement - Downtown

Base Parking Requirement
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
5 Spaces +
Auto Parts
1 Space
(New &
7,428 SF
For Each
43
Rebuilt)
200 SF of
GFA
43
37
Y*
41
2
35
2
Y*
Loading Spaces
1
1
Y
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustrate
the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.
Waivers
Requirement
The use of arcades, awnings and
canopies on the ground floor of
a building.
70% of the first story faade
shall align along the front
property line.
Parking lot screening is required
for parking areas adjacent to the
public right-of-way.
Exceptions
Requirement
Landscape islands shall be
provided at the end of each row
of parking space with at least
one shade tree.
Request
To provide no arcades,
awnings and/or
canopies on the ground
floor of the building.
To align zero percent
of the first story faade
along the front property
line.
To provide no parking
lot screening (fence)
adjacent to the public
right-of-way.
Staff Recommendation
Request
To provide seven (7)
landscape islands and
seven (7) 24-inch box
trees where eleven (11)
landscape islands with
eleven (11) 24-inch box
trees are required.
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
NE
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SDR-66808
b 7 7
A 77
777 77 7 77 b
77A 7 b 7b 7 7 b
77 7b -77 7
77777- 777 777 777b 7b 7
7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
7 7
77777 777b 7b 777b 7 7

7777 777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 77 77777 777
777 777
b 7
A
777
77 77
7
77
777
7 7
A 7A b A
7 7 7
A 7 7
7A 7 7 77
7b 77
A77A
A b A 77 7
A777777
777
7A77
77A7
7
A777
7 b
777
7b7
7777b7
7
77A
b7777
777
7A777
7A77
A7
7 77777b7
A7777b7
b7 A7
77
7
7
777
777
b7777
7A
A b A 7 b7b77b7
777
b77
77
7
777
77A7
b77
A7 77<7
b777
7A7 <
77
7
777
7777777777777777777
7777777777
77
7777<7777777b7777
7777777777777777
777<777777777
777777777
7A777
77
A77777777
7
7777777
77
7777
7

777
SDR-66808
b
7
7
7
7
777777b777
7
77777777
A7Ab7A
777 77
7777 777777
A77
7777
7A7777
SDR-66808
SDR-66808
SDR-66808
77A7A
77
77
A7
7A
77A7A
77
77
A7
7A
77A7A
77
77
7A
7A7
77A7A
77
77
77
7A
SDR-66808
A7
777777A7A
bb7A7b7A7A7Ab7
b77A77b77
777A7A
77A777b7A
A
777
b7b77A7A77A7A7A
7b7A777bA7A7A77
bA7777A7A

7AA777A7A7Ab7
A7b7777bA7A
A7A
777
7777b
b77A77A77
777b7AA
7bA7A7777
A77A7A7A7AA7A
bAbA7A7A777bAbA
bAbA777777bAbA7A
7777bbA7A
77777A
7A777b7A7bA7A
AA777A777bA
b77
777777A7A7
7b77
77A7A77777A7A
A777Ab77A
7A77777bA77
bA777777
7Ab777A77bbA
Ab77777A7A
7777777
bb7A77b7b77A7
7A777A77A
7A777A7A7A
7A777A7A7A
7A777A7
AA7
7b777A7b7A7A7
bb7A77b77A7bb
AA7
Abb7b777A7b7A7A7
bb7A77b77A7bb
7A7A777
77b777b77AA
7AA7
777A777A
7777b77AA7
777A7AA7
777bAbA7A7bbA7A
77b7A77AA7
77b7AA77AA7
A7
7Ab77A77A
777
b77A7A77
7Ab77A77A
7777bAb7A
777A7A7777A77
7A7
777
b7A7777b7b7
7
7777A777A
77A7
777
b7bA7A
77A77b7777
b77A7777b7
7Ab77A77A
7777A777A
7bA7A7A77A777
777
b7A7777b7b7
7
7777A777A
7bA7A7A7A
777
b7AA
7777A777A
7A7A77
A7A77A
777
7Ab7bA7777A
bA77Ab7777777A7
7bA777b7Ab777A777A7
bA7b7A7AbA
A777Ab7bA
A77bA77b777Ab7A77
7bA777b77777A77
bA
b77A7A77
77A77b
b77
77Ab
77
777b7AA
7bb7A77b
777
7Ab7bA7777A
bA77Ab7777777A7
7bA777b7Ab777A777A7
bA7b7A7AbA
A777Ab7bA
A77bA77b777Ab7A77
7bA777b77777A77
bA
b77A77A77
77A7Abb7b
b77
77Ab
77
777b7AA
7bb7A77b
7A
777A
b7
b7AA77A777
b77A7A77Ab
7AA
7A77
77b7A7777A77
7A7A777
777
7
7 7 77A7A7
bA7A7
A7A7AA
A7 7 b
7A7
bA7b
77A
77
77
7A7bA
77
7 7
77A
77A7A
77
77
A7
7A
77A7A
77
77
A7
7A
77A7A
77
77
7A
7A7
77A7A
77
77
77
7A
SDR-66808
A7
A7
777777A7A
bb7A7b7A7A7Ab7
b77A77b77
777A7A
77A777b7A
A
777
b7b77A7A77A7A7A
7b7A777bA7A7A77
bA7777A7A
7AA777A7A7Ab7
A7b7777bA7A
A7A
777
7777b
b77A7A77
777b7AA
7Ab77A77A
A77A7A7A7AA7A
bAbA7A7A777bAbA
bAbA777777bAbA7A
7777bbA7A
77777A
7A777b7A7bA7A
AA777A777bA
b77
777777A7A7
7b77
77A7A77777A7A
A777Ab77A
7A77777bA77
bA777777
7Ab777A77bbA
Ab77777A7A
7777777
bb7A77b7b77A7
7A777A77A
7A777A7A7A
7A777A7A7A
7A777A7
AA7
7b777A7b7A7A7
bb7A77b77A7bb
AA7
Abb7b777A7b7A7A7
bb7A77b77A7bb
7A7A777
77b777b77AA
7AA7
777A777A
7777b77AA7
777A7AA7
777bAbA7A7bbA7A
77b7A77AA7
77b7AA77AA7
7bA7A7777
777
b77A7A77
7Ab77A77A
7777bAb7A
777A7A7777A77
7A7
777
b7A7777A
7
7777A777A
77A7
777
b7bA7A
77A77b7777
b77A7A77b7
7Ab77A77A
7777A777A
7bA7A7A77A777
777
b7A7777b7b7
7
7777A777A
7bA7A7A7A
777
b7AA
7777A777A
7A7A77
A7A77A
777
7Ab7bA7777A
bA77Ab7777777A7
7bA777b7Ab777A777A7
bA7b7A7AbA
A777Ab7bA
A77bA77b777Ab7A77
7bA777b77777A77
bA
b77A7A77
77A77b
b77
77Ab
77
777b7AA
7bb7A77b
777
7Ab7bA7777A
bA77Ab7777777A7
7bA777b7Ab777A777A7
bA7b7A7AbA
A777Ab7bA
A77bA77b777Ab7A77
7bA777b77777A77
bA
b77A77A77
77A7Abb7b
b77
77Ab
77
777b7AA
7bb7A77b
7A
777A
b7AA77A777b
b77A7A77Ab
7AA
7A77
77b7A7777A77
7A7A777
777
7
b
A
7
bb
7
7 7 77A7A7
bA
7A7
A7 7 b
A
b
7
7
A
A
7
AA
7A7
bA7b
77A
77
77
7A7bA
77
7 7
77A
77
7777A
77777A
A77A77b
77A77b7
7 777A
bA777
77777A
77
77
bA7 7 77 7
Ab7
77777A
A7AA7b
SDR-66808
A7A
7A
A77A7A7
77A77b7
7 777A
A7A
7A7b777
7777A
77777A
A77A77b
77A77b7
7 777A
b7
A7AA7A
77Ab77
77
b
7A7
77Ab77
Ab7
A7AA7
77A7A7AA
Ab77A7AA7A
77777A
A77A7A7
77bA
77A77b7
7 777A
A 7
7b77A
77
7
7 777A
77
b7
A7
77
7 7A
7
7
7 7
7
7
A7
7b7A777A77A7A
A A A
A7A77A7A7A7A7A
A A
A7777A77AA7AA7A7
AA AA A
77
AbbA7A7A7bA
A
77AA7777777Ab7A
Ab A

777A777
A7A7A7A7A7A7A7A777A7A
A A
A A
7A
AA
A
7b7A77A77
b A A A
b777777b7A7A77A
A A AA
bA777A7A7A77AA
A A A
777A7777A7A7A7
7A777bA7b
7A7b77b777A7b7
7b777777b7A7Ab777
7b7b77777AA7A77A7A
A7Ab777A7Ab7
77A7Ab7A
77A777A77b7bA
AA7A7
7777A77A7A7A77A7
777bA7A77bA7
7b
b77b7bA7A77Ab777
b77A7A777777b7
b7Ab777A7A7
77AA7A7Ab77777A7A777A
7Abb77AAb7bA
A777A77b7A777AA
7A
777A7b7A7A77AA7b
AbA
A7777b77AA7A77AA
7A
b7
7A7
77AA77Ab7A77bbA7b
777A777A7
A7A7Abb77Ab7bb7AAb
AA7Ab77A77
7bA777bA7bA
777A777A
bA7
A777A777b
7A77A7A77b77777
7b777b7777A7
7A77A77b
Ab777A77bA77A77
A77777b77A7A7A
AA77b7777A7bA
Ab77A7Ab77777A7
7b7A777A777A
7Ab77Ab77777A7
777Ab77777bAAb
7b777777A
A777Ab77A77A
777A77b
777A777A7b
777bA7A77AA
77A7bAb7A77A
7A777777777b
77b7777A
77A7A
A
77A7A777Ab7
bbA77b7777A
77A777A7b7
bA7
7b7A7AA77
777A777A
7AA777Abb77A
b 777A777b7
AA7
bA
777bA7A777
7b77A777A7
A77b77b77
A7777Ab777A7bb
A 77b7AA77AA7

7 7 77A7A7
bA7A7
A7A7AA
A7 7 b
7
7
bA7b
77A
77
77
7A7bA
77
7 7
77A
SDR-66808

bA7A7
A
A7A7AA7
bA
A7b
b
7
7A

A
A

77

77
A
7
bb
7
b7A7
7 7 77A7A
A77 b
7A7bA
77
7 7
77A
SDR-66808 [PRJ-66574] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: SIMONCRE CARP VII, LLC
- OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 22, LLC
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
2100 FREMONT STREET
09/26/16
77777777777777777777777777777
777777777
777A77
777
77777$7777
7777777777777777777
7777 7777777777777
77b777777777777777777777
A77
A777$7
7
7
7
777
77
777b
777777777777777
A777bb7
7
777A77777777777$
77b7
777:77777777A777777
777b77777777777
7777777777777777777
77777777A777A7777777
777777777
7777777
7 7:7
7 A77777777777
7 :77
A777777777b77
777777777777777777
777777777777777
777777777777777$7777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7
7777777
7 $7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 77
7 7
7 7
7 77
7 7
7 7
7 77
7777
7 7
7 77
7 77
77777A
77
77
77$7
777 7
7
777777:7
7
777
7
77
7
777$777777777$
77A7$77777777
777A77b777777$7

777
777777777777777777777777777777777b7777b:7777
SDR-66808

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - GPA-66496 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of
Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417].
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ66417]
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ66417]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
6. Protest Postcards - GPA-66496 and ZON-66497 [PRJ-66417]
GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL
INVESTMENT 4, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
GPA-66496
ZON-66497
VAR-66498
SDR-66499
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-66496
GPA-66496
ZON-66497
GPA-66496
ZON-66497
VAR-66498
** NOTIFICATION **
21
NOTICES MAILED
63 - GPA-66496 and ZON-66497

63 - VAR-66498 and SDR-66499
APPROVALS
0 - GPA-66496 and ZON-66497

0 - VAR-66498 and SDR-66499
PROTESTS
2 - GPA-66496 and ZON-66497

2 - VAR-66498 and SDR-66499
JB

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Review (SDR-66499) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496), Rezoning (ZON-66497) and

approval and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-66498) shall
be required, if approved.
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan and building
elevations date stamped 08/29/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
JB

Conditions Page Two
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is
required.
5.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to not orient the building to the corner
where such is required.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.

of any traffic control device.
9.
10.
Public Works
11.
Dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way where such does not exist adjacent to this site for
Centennial Parkway prior to the issuance of any permits. Additionally, grant a 5-foot
Pedestrian Access Easement for a future detached sidewalk on Tenaya Way adjacent to this
site prior to the issuance of any permit
12.
Construct all incomplete half-street improvements meeting Complete Street standards on

Centennial Parkway and Bilpar Road including the required Multi-Use Non-Equestrian
Trail that is to be privately maintained by the adjacent property owner concurrent with
development of this site. Conceptual plans for the Centennial Parkway improvements and
roadway transitioning must be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to submittal of
construction drawings for permitting. Install all appurtenant underground facilities, if any,
adjacent to this site needed for the future traffic signal system concurrent with development
of this site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc.,
located within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to construction of
JB

hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete). All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent
with development of this site.
13.
Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk and the
proposed driveway on Tenaya Way in accordance with code requirements of Title
13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.
All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
14.
15.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
16.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the

Tenaya Way, Bilpar Road and Centennial Parkway public rights-of-way prior to this
issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy
for the term of the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an
additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant
shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms of the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and
maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns
pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the
Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of
Building and Safety (229-4836).
17.
Fire Services.
18.
Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance with
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
JB

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and Variance for a proposed 8,800 squarefoot Office (Medical or Dental) and Clinic with Waivers to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
required on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way.
ISSUES
The applicant has proposed to amend the General Plan land use designation of the property
from R (Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial).
The applicant has proposed to rezone the property from U (Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial).
The site is located east of the Town Center Master Plan area. Objective 2.3 of the Centennial
Hills Sector Plan protects existing residential neighborhoods from sprawling commercial and
office development by encasing such uses within the Town Center area. This request does
not meet the intent of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 has been requested, to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 has been requested, to not orient the building to the corner of
the site towards the right-of-way where such is required. Staff recommends denial of this
request.
A Variance (VAR-66498) is required to allow a 10-foot residential adjacency setback where
81 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The Office (Medical or Dental) and Clinic uses are permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district.
ANALYSIS
The applicant has proposed a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-66499) to develop the
subject site with two 4,400 square-foot buildings for a proposed Medical Office and Clinic on
1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. Accompanying
Waivers are required to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the south perimeter and an 11foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is required, and to not orient the building to
the corner of the site where such is required. The subject site is located in the Centennial Hills
Sector of the General Plan and has a current land use designation of R (Rural Density
JB

Residential) and zoning designation of U (Undeveloped). The applicant has submitted a request
for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496) from R (Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service
Commercial), a Rezoning (ZON-66497) from U (Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited Commercial)
and a Variance (VAR-66498) to address residential adjacency setbacks for the proposed Office
(Medical or Dental) and Clinic land use.
An Office (Medical or Dental) use is described in Tile 19.12 as: A professional office for the
administration of professional medical, psychological or dental care, including examinations,
screenings and minor outpatient surgical procedures. This use does not include a facility that
provides housing for individuals, a clinic, or any other facility that is specifically defined in this
Title. A Clinic use is described in Tile 19.12 as: A facility which is occupied and used for the
purpose of providing dental or medical care, and which regularly provides any of those services
to the general public on an emergency basis or without appointment. This use does not include a
hospital or a facility which provides for the overnight care or overnight stay of patients.
The proposed site design complies with all applicable Title 19.08.070 site design requirements
pertaining to building setbacks, which requires a 10-foot front yard setback, 10-foot corner side
setback, 10-foot side yard setback and a 20-foot rear setback. The submitted elevations show a 27foot building height adjacent to the existing R-E [Rural Estates Residential (Clark County
Designation)] zoned single-family residence located to the east, which does not comply with
residential adjacency standards outlined in Title 19.06.040. The applicant has requested a Variance
(VAR-66498) to allow a 10-foot residential adjacency setback where 81 feet is required. The
proposed 8,800 square-foot development will cover approximately 16% of the 1.21 acre site. The
submitted building elevations indicate the building faades will have a tan and orange stucco finish,
with slate tile veneer accents.
The site will provide 44 total parking spaces with three ADA parking spaces, which matches the
44 spaces required by Title 19.12.010 for a 4,400 square-foot Office (Medical or Dental) and
4,400 square-foot Clinic. The parking area also provides space for one loading zone and one
trash enclosure, which have been designed to comply with Title 19.08 standards.
All interior parking lot landscaping and landscape buffer planting materials have been designed
to comply with code requirements for spacing and quantities; except for the landscaping buffer
area adjacent to the northern and southern perimeter of the property where the applicant has
requested a Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the south perimeter and an 11foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is required. The primary tree species being
utilized are the 24 box Mexican Palo Verde, 24 box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box Holly Oak,
24 box Ash and 24 box African Sumac trees. There is also a multi-use transportation trail
which runs along the southern property line, which will have a five-foot amenity zone and a 10foot detached sidewalk.
Staff has determined the proposed project is not compatible with surrounding development in the
area, as demonstrated by the associated Waivers and Variances. Therefore, staff is recommends
denial of this project with conditions.
JB

FINDINGS (GPA-66496)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be met
in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1.
The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The proposed SC (Service Commercial) land use designation for this site is compatible
with the O (Office) designation on the parcel directly to the north of this site and with the
OP (Office Professional) designation on the adjacent parcels to the east in Clark Countys
jurisdiction. However, the intensity of the proposed amendment is not compatible with the
RN (Rural Neighborhood Clark County) designation on properties north and south of
Bilpar Road that make up this neighborhood.
2.
The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
Approval of the proposed amendment to SC (Service Commercial) would allow for a C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning designation. Staff finds that this zoning district would be
compatible with the zoning on the parcel directly to the north, but would not be compatible
with the adjacent low density single-family residential uses in the surrounding area.
3.
There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
The area west of this site is beginning to develop as a large multi-family residential
development with access to commercial uses. Eastbound Centennial Parkway narrows to a
two-lane thoroughfare at the intersection of Tenaya Way. Tenaya Way provides vehicular
access over the CC 215 Beltway and can accommodate the increased capacity for traffic
generated by commercial uses on the subject site. Some utility infrastructure is not yet in
place and would be required as the area becomes more developed.
4.
The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.
Because this site is not located within the Town Center Plan Area, staff finds that this
request is in conflict with Section 3.2 of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan, which states
that the intent of the Centennial Hills Town Center concept is to prevent the sprawl of
commercial and office projects into developing residential neighborhoods by centrally
locating the Centennial Town Center around the Beltway/Highway 95 interchange.
The concentration of economic activities within the Town Center area will aid in the
JB

preservation of the rural lifestyle which exists in most of the residential neighborhoods
located within the Centennial Hills area.
FINDINGS (ZON-66497)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

If the companion application for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496) to SC (Service
Commercial) land use designation is approved, the proposed Rezoning to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) would conform to the General Plan.
2.
The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
If approved, the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district would allow for most retail
shopping and personal services. Staff has determined this zoning district does not allow
enough of a transition from the rural neighborhood to the north and east of the subject site.
3.
Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The Centennial Hills Sector Plan identifies the U.S. 95/I-215 interchange west of the
subject site as the area where commercial development in the Northwest should be
centered in order to aid the preservation of the rural lifestyle that already exists in this area.
The requested rezoning will therefore not meet any identified existing need for
commercially zoned property in this area.
4.
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
The abutting streets (Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way) are planned as a 60-foot wide
Local Street and 80-foot Secondary Collector respectively according to the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways. Each would carry adequate capacity for traffic generated by
medical office/clinic-intensity commercial uses on the subject site.
JB

1.
2.
3.


resolution.
No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to orient the proposed structures adjacent to
existing single-family land uses. Alternative building placement oriented towards the corner of
the site along Tenaya Way would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the
absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances.
1.

The proposed Office (Medical or Dental) and Clinic use is not compatible with the
adjacent residential development in the area, as evidenced by the associated Waivers
and Variances. Staff has determined that the proposed land uses are too intense and not
compatible with the RN (Rural Neighborhood Clark County) designation on properties
located northeast of the subject site that make up this neighborhood.
2.
JB

The proposed Office (Medical or Dental) and Clinic development is consistent with the
General Plan. However, the proposed design does not comply with all Title 19
development standards. The applicant has requested Waivers to allow a zero-foot
landscape buffer along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter
where 15 feet is required and to not orient the building to the corner of the site where such
is required. In addition, the applicant has also requested a Variance to allow a 10-foot
residential adjacency setback where 81 feet is required. Staff has determined the associated
Waivers and Variance will have a negative impact to the overall development.
3.

Access to the site will be provided by Centennial Parkway a 60-foot wide Local Street, and
Tenaya Way an 80-foot Secondary Collector according to the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways and are sufficient in size to carry the minimal amount of traffic this proposed
development will generate.
4.
The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building faades will have a tan and orange stucco finish, with slate tile veneer
accents. The primary tree species being utilized are the 24 box Mexican Palo Verde, 24
box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box Holly Oak, 24 box Ash and 24 box African Sumac
trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional
Plant List.
5.

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable for the
surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert environment.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to protect
the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.
JB

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0024-00) approximately
12/05/01
1.32 acres at the southeast corner of Bilpar Road and Tenaya Way. The
Annexation became effective 12/14/01.
The Planning Commission tabled a request to amend the General Plan (GPA3032) to change the land use designation from R (Rural Density Residential)
to SC (Service Commercial) on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of
Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. Staff had recommended denial.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Rezoning (ZON-3033) from
U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] to
01/08/04
C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial
Parkway and Tenaya Way. Staff had recommended denial.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-3034) for a proposed 5,600 square-foot retail building on 1.21
acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. Staff
had recommended denial.
The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to hold GPA-66496, ZON-66497,
10/11/16
VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 in abeyance to the November 1, 2016 Planning
Commission meeting.
10/26/04
There are no building permits or business licenses related to this site.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to review the
application materials and submittal requirements for the proposed General
05/24/16
Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Variance and Site Development Plan Review
requests.
A required neighborhood meeting was held at the Centennial Hills YMCA at
6601 North Buffalo Drive in Las Vegas to discuss the proposal. Six members
09/26/16
of the public, two members of the development team/owner, one staff
member from the City Council Office and one staff from the Planning
Department were in attendance.
JB

The following concerns were raised:
The neighbors indicated they would prefer homes to be built on the
subject site.
One neighbor preferred development over a vacant lot.
The neighbors feel the approval and construction of the apartment
complex across the street has now opened the door for commercial to
take over the area and that the neighborhood will forever be changed,
and no longer rural.
One neighbor indicated concern over no street lighting being installed
in the area. Did not like individuals walking in the dark during
evening/night hours.
Questions were raised over the hours of operation of the proposed
facility, applicant indicated that they did not intend to lease to a 24hour operation.
The neighbors expressed concern over the construction of the apartment
complex on the corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. The
neighbors indicated they were promised lush landscape buffers and the
planting materials going in now are not sufficient, as well as a wrought iron
fence being attached to the neighbors rear yard block walls. Staff indicated
that the issues raised would be investigated by Planning and the Code
Enforcement division.
Field Check
09/01/16
Staff conducted a routine site visit a found the subject site to be an

undeveloped parcel of land.

Site Area
Net Acres
1.21
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
South
Undeveloped
Right-of-Way
Planned or Special
R (Rural Density
Residential)
O (Office)
ROW (Right-of-Way)

U (Undeveloped)
O (Office)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
JB

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
East
Single Family,
Detached
West
Undeveloped
(approved MultiFamily Residential)
Planned or Special
OP (Office Professional)
Clark County
Designation
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)

R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County Designation
T-C (Town Center)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Width
100 SF
Min. Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
Side
10 Feet
Corner
10 Feet
20 Feet
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
N/A
Provided
150 SF
Compliance
Y
20 Feet
Y
10 Feet
Y
115 Feet
Y
20 Feet
Y
16 %
Y
27 Feet
N*
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
a Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Y
*The proposed building height does not comply with the residential adjacency standards set forth
in Title 19.08.040(H).
JB


Residential Adjacency Standards
Required/Allowed
3:1 proximity slope
81 Feet
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
Existing Zoning
U (Undeveloped)
Proposed Zoning
C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Existing General Plan
R (Rural Density Residential)
Proposed General Plan
SC (Service Commercial)
Permitted Density
1 du/lot
Permitted Density
N/A
Permitted Density
3.59 du/ac
Permitted Density
N/A
Provided
10 Feet
145 Feet
Compliance
N*
Y
Units Allowed
1
Units Allowed
N/A
Units Allowed
4
Units Allowed
N/A

Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
11 Trees
11 Trees
Y
South
6 Trees
6 Trees
Y
East
9 Trees
13 Trees
Y
11 Trees
11 Trees
Y
West
37 Trees
41 Trees
Y
Parking Area Trees
10 Trees
10 Trees
Y
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
11 Feet
N*
South
15 Feet
0 Feet
N*
East
8 Feet
10 Feet
Y
15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
West
Wall Height
Not Indicated
Y or N
*Waivers from Title 19.08.070 are required to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the south
perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is required.
JB

Street Name
Centennial Parkway
Tenaya Way
Bilpar Road
Tenaya Way
Centennial Parkway
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Local Street
Major Collector
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
and Highways
Required
5-foot amenity zone, 5foot detached sidewalk
(Multi-Use
Transportation Trail) 5foot amenity zone, 10foot detached sidewalk
with 5-foot landscaping
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
50 Feet
80 Feet
Provided
(Multi-Use
Transportation Trail) 5foot amenity zone, 10foot detached sidewalk
with 5-foot landscaping
Compliance
Y
Y
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1:200 up
Office
to 2,000
Medical or
4,400 SF
24
SF, then
Dental
1:175 SF.
1:200 up
to 2,000
Clinic
4,400 SF
20
SF, then
1:250 SF.
44
44
Y
42
2
41
3
Y
Loading
Less than
1
1
Y
Spaces
10,000 SF
JB

Waivers
Requirement
A 15-foot landscaping buffer is

required along all rights-of-way.
Buildings on corner lots should

be oriented to the corner and to
the street fronts.
Request
To allow a zero-foot
landscape buffer along
the south perimeter and
an 11-foot buffer along
the north perimeter
where 15 feet is
required.
To not orient the
proposed buildings to
the corner where such
is required.
Denial
Denial
JB
GPA-66496
GPA-66496
77A
777

777
A77 777A
77
b
b777b

b
77
7

7

5bb 5
5bb775
b47b
b
4 b
777b
b777b
b

b
777
77
77
7
77

77
77
b 7b
b77
b
77
b777b

774
4

7
7777
77 77
b777b
57775
5
5
777
b777b
b

b7777b
b

7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
777 7
7777
77
b
A7A
A
77777
77777777
7A7
7b7
777%Ab7bb7b77A7A
7
7
bb7bbA
bA7%%bbb
7
77
77
AA7
7%7
bA
A7
A
7
77%77Ab7
%Ab7
A7
%A7%7AA7A7
bA7%%b7
AA7AA7AA7A7
77
GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499
7b
77A
7
7
AbA7Abb7
7A7
7
7
%%A
A
7A
AbA7Abb7A777b77777b7A
%7A7%A7A7A7
AA
7bb7A7bA7%
AbA7Abb7A
bb7A7b777A77b7%7A7A
7Ab7A
AbA7AA777AbA7A7
A
bA
7A
AA7A
77bb7b7A7b7777b7%7A
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
7%7%
77777
A
A
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
7777
77
b
A7A
A
77777
77777777
7A7
7b7
777%Ab7bb7b77A7A
7
7
bb7bbA
bA7%%bbb
7
77
77
AA7
7%7
bA
A7
A
7
77%77Ab7
%Ab7
A7
%A7%7AA7A7
bA7%%b7
AA7AA7AA7A7
77
7b
77A
7
7
AbA7Abb7
7A7
7
7
%%A
A
7A
AbA7Abb7A777b77777b7A
%7A7%A7A7A7
AA
7bb7A7bA7%
AbA7Abb7A
bb7A7b777A77b7%7A7A
7Ab7A
AbA7AA777AbA7A7
A
bA
7A
AA7A
77bb7b7A7b7777b7%7A
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
7%7%
77777
A
A
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
7777
b
A7A
A
A
7A
7
A%bA7Ab7
7
7
7
A7A
7%
A
%7
7A
7A
7
A7
7A
7
A7
7AbAbA
A7
A77
bA7A7
-
AA7A
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
A7
b77777b7-
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
7777
b
A7A
A
A
7A
7
A%bA7Ab7
7
7
7
A7A
7%
A
%7
7A
7A
7
A7
7A
7
A7
7AbAbA
A7
A77
bA7A7
-
AA7A
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
A7
b77777b7-
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
bA7A
A77
A7%7
bA
bb
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
77777
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
bA7A
A77
A7%7
bA
bb
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
77777
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
bA7A
A77
A7%7
bA
bb
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
77777
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
7777
77b
77-7A

77777777777777777777777 7
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
b77777b7-
77777
7%7%
bA7%%bbb
77-7A77777777777--
b777
77777777777777777777777
77A
7A
AbA
7A
7A7AA77A
AbA
bb77
77A
AbA
7b77
7A
77 7
7 7
7A7
7A7bb7777A7bA
bb77
A
AbA
7b77
7A
77 7
7 7 7
7A7bb77AA
bb77
A
AbA
7 7
7b77
77bb77A77A
bAA7A
bb7%
%7
A7%7
7A
% A
A777b
77777A
A7A7bb77A7%
bb7%
%7
7A
Ab7777b
%
AA77bA
A7A7bb77A7%
bb7%
%7
7A
Ab777b7A
A7bb77A7%
bA7b
b7A7
b7bA
%Ab7A
bb7%
%7
777b7b
7A
Ab7%777b7A
A7bb77A7%
A bA7%7A
7bA7
7bAb77A
bb7%
7A
A777b7A7A
bb77A7%
bb7%
7A
777b7A
b A
A7bb77A7%
%
bA7%%bbb
b
b77777b7-
77%7%
b777777777777777777777777777
77-7A77777777777--
- A
GPA-66496 [PRJ-66417] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-66497, VAR-66498 AND

SDR-66499 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND TENAYA WAY
09/01/16

09/01/16

09/01/16
GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 - REVISED
GPA-66496, ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 - REVISED

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: NOVMBER 1, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - ZON-66497 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-66496 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on
1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804001), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]

paper use, backup
ZON-66497
ZON-66497
77A7

A777A
77 7
77 =

77
7
777 7=

b77 =
b
777b
77 =
A 7
77

7

2
72
77
7
77
7

77
77 7

77
7

b77b
b
b
777

b 777b
b
b77
b 7b
b
77
7

77
7
b 77
7b
b
77
7

b 77
7b
b
b
7b
b 77

b
77 7
7 72
b 7
b77

2
2
77 7

77A
b77b
b
b
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
777 7

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-66498 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-66496 AND ZON-66497 PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN TEN-FOOT
RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 81 FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at
the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] Zone
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)] Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcards - VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]

paper use, backup
VAR-66498
VAR-66498

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-66499 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA66496, ZON-66497 AND VAR-66498 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,800 SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL
CLINIC AND MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A
ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PERIMETER, AN 11-FOOT
BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO
NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 1.21
acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] Zone
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)] Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-66499
SDR-66499

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-66443 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
A 15-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 9.27 acres at the
southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
11
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447
[PRJ-66309]
2. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR66447 [PRJ-66309]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR66447 [PRJ-66309]
4. Supporting Documentation - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR66447 [PRJ-66309]
5. Photo(s) - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447 [PRJ-66309]
6. Justification Letter - VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447
[PRJ-66309]
7. Protest/Support Postcards for VAR-66443 and SUP-66444 [PRJ-66309] and Protest Email for
VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447 [PRJ-66309]
VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and

SDR-66447

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66443
SUP-66444
SUP-66445
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
VAR-66443
SUP-66446

conditions:
SDR-66447

conditions:
VAR-66443
SUP-66444
VAR-66443
SUP-66444
SUP-66445
VAR-66443
SUP-66444
SUP-66445
SUP-66446
** NOTIFICATION **
33
NOTICES MAILED
139 - VAR-66443 and SUP-66444

139 - SUP-66445 and SUP-66446
139 - SDR-66447
APPROVALS
2 - VAR-66443 and SUP-66444

1 - SUP-66445 and SUP-66446
3 - SDR-66447
PROTESTS
11 - VAR-66443 and SUP-66444

13 - SUP-66445 and SUP-66446
11 - SDR-66447
SS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permits (SUP66444, SUP-66445 and SUP-66446) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-66447)
shall be required.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Car Wash, Full
Service use.
2.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-66443),

Special Use Permits (SUP-66445 and SUP-66446) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-66447) shall be required.
SS

Conditions Page Two
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use.
2.

3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
SS

7.
8.
Municipal Code.
9.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.
2.

3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
7.
Municipal Code.
8.
SS

Conditions Page Four
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-66443)

and Special Use Permits (SUP-66444, SUP-66445 and SUP-66446) shall be required, if
approved.
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan, date
stamped 09/27/16 and building elevations, date stamped 08/25/16, except as amended by
conditions herein.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.040(B)(6) is hereby approved, to allow the proposed

convenience store to be set back from the corner where buildings on corner lots shall be
oriented to the corner and street fronts.
5.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a five-foot perimeter

landscape buffer along a portion of the south property line where eight feet is required.
6.
A Waiver from 19.08.040(B)(4) is hereby approved, to allow a single car wash bay to face
a public right-of-way (Deer Springs Way) where such is not allowed.
7.
An Exception from Title 19.08.110(C)(12) is hereby approved, to allow 89 parking lot trees
where 102 shade trees are required in islands and the ends of parking rows.
8.
Parking areas shall be screened from adjacent roadways by a low wall or berm with a
maximum height of 30 inches, a solid living hedge of approximately 36 inches or some
other screening method as approved by the Department of Planning. The site plan and
landscape plan shall be revised to indicate how the parking area will be screened.
SS

Conditions Page Five
9.
Safety.
10.
11.
The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
12.

changes from the conceptual landscape plan:
A. Provide 24-inch box shade trees within the proposed amenity zone along Deer
Springs Way a maximum of 40 feet on center in conformance with Complete Streets
Standards.
B. Provide 24-inch box shade trees within the proposed amenity zone along Hualapai
Way a maximum of 45 feet on center in conformance with Complete Streets
Standards.
C. Provide four (4) additional 24-inch box trees in the proposed perimeter landscape
buffer along the north property line, for a total of 19 trees. Provide four (4) fivegallon shrubs per required tree.
D. Provide four (4) additional 24-inch box trees in the proposed perimeter landscape
buffer along the south property line, for a total of 19 trees. Provide four (4) fivegallon shrubs per required tree.
13.
14.
SS

Conditions Page Six
Public Works
15.
Dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way adjacent to this site for those portions of Deer Springs
Way not previously dedicated and appropriate right-of-way for the north half of Inyo
Avenue and the northern half of the Inyo Avenue cul-de-sac prior to issuance of building
permits for this site. Additionally, dedicate a 35-foot radius with a Traffic Signal Chord
Easement at the southeast corner or Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way. Also dedicate
additional right-of-way per Standard Drawing #201.1 on Hualapai Way and Deer Springs
Way including an exclusive right turn lane on Hualapai Way prior to the issuance of
building permits for this site.
16.
Grant pedestrian access easements for all public sidewalks located outside of the public
right-of-way prior to issuance of building permits for this site.
17.
Construct all half-street improvements on Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way per current
City Standards and matching improvements to the east on Deer Springs including traffic
signal underground infrastructure at the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and Deer
Springs Way adjacent to this site. All existing off-site improvements damaged or removed
by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site. The design of improvements including median
islands on Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way must meet the approval of the City Traffic
Engineer.
18.
Per Condition #9 of TMP-64814, construct improvements on Inyo Avenue concurrent with

the development of this site. Inyo Avenue improvements shall include complete half street
improvements for the north half of Inyo Avenue, including a fully paved terminating culde-sac and temporary paving on the south half to accommodate two-way vehicular traffic
concurrent with on-site development activities. Permits for the site may be issued without
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) grant for the south half of Inyo Avenue; however,
no work on Assessor Parcel Number #125-19-301-012 is permitted without an issued BLM
grant. The southwest quarter of the Inyo Avenue cul-de-sac was granted as right-of-way
easement to Clark County by Document #20141208:01625.
19.
Concurrent with development of this site, extend a public sewer line in Inyo Avenue from
where it currently terminates to the terminating cul-de-sac bulb at a size and location
acceptable to the Department of Public Works.
20.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement to the City of Las Vegas for all landscaping and
private improvements in the Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way public rights-of-way
adjacent to this site. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of
SS

Conditions Page Seven
the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any
successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment
Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the Land
Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
21.
A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any
construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section
addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-ofway requirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement of on site development
activities unless specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by
the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
22.
23.
Comply with all applicable conditions of approval of Tentative Map TMP-64814 and any
other site related actions.
SS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to develop a shopping center on 9.27 acres of undeveloped land at the
southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The center would be anchored by a
grocery store and have three in-line multitenant buildings. A corner convenience store with fuel
pumps and two additional pad sites are also proposed. The applications were held in abeyance at
the request of the applicant in order to revise the site plan and landscape plan. As a result, the
waiver request to allow five-foot perimeter landscape buffers along the north and west property
lines is no longer needed.
ISSUES
The previously requested Waiver to allow a five-foot perimeter landscape buffer along a
portion of the west property line and a five-foot perimeter landscape buffer along a portion of
the north property line where 15 feet is required is no longer needed, as the applicant has
submitted revised site and landscape plans that indicate 15-foot buffer widths. The redesign
reduced parking by seven spaces, but the overall site will remain in conformance with Title
19 parking requirements.
A trash enclosure that had been located in direct view of the Deer Springs way right-of-way
was relocated behind the proposed car wash vacuum bays and screened by landscaping to
conform to Title 19 commercial development standards.
Approval of a Variance is necessary to allow a 15-foot rear yard setback for the Shops A
building where 20 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of the Variance request.
No landscape buffer is proposed along the east perimeter due to anticipation of a future
commercial site on the adjacent lot, which is part of the same proposed commercial
subdivision. Staff recommends denial of the associated Waiver.
A Waiver is required to allow a five-foot perimeter landscape buffer along a portion of the
south property line where eight feet is required. Staff recommends denial of the waiver.
A Waiver is required to allow buildings to not be oriented to the corner and street frontages
where such is required. Staff recommends denial of the waiver.
A Waiver is required to allow car wash bays to face a public right-of-way (Deer Springs
Way) where such is not allowed. Staff recommends denial of the waiver.
An Exception is required to allow 89 parking lot trees where 102 trees and accompanying
shrubs are required. Staff recommends denial of the Exception.
Additional trees are required within the perimeter landscape buffers. An Exception was not
requested. A condition of approval addresses this deficiency, which is due to spacing trees
too far apart.
SS

A Car Wash, Full Service use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district
with approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Grocery Store with Alcohol is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district. All conditions can be met by the proposed use.
A Drive-Through is a conditional use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. All
conditions can be met by the proposed use.
Two parking rows face the perimeter streets. Per Title 19.08.110, these rows must be
screened from adjacent roadways in a manner acceptable to the Department of Planning. A
condition of approval addresses this.
ANALYSIS
Development within this site is subject to the requirements of LVMC Title 19, specifically 19.08
Commercial Development Standards and C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district standards
and 19.12 regarding permitted uses. Several changes were made to the site and landscape plans
on 10/20/16 to bring certain aspects of these plans into conformance with Title 19. The portions
of the north and west perimeter buffers that were less than 15 feet were widened to 15 feet. In
order to free up additional area for these buffers, seven parking spaces were eliminated, one
drive aisle was narrowed and the sidewalk adjacent to Shops C was narrowed. The plans were
also corrected to remove areas of the parking lot that were within the north side of the Inyo
Avenue cul-de-sac, which is required to be improved by condition of the related Tentative Map
(TMP-64814). As a result of these changes, there will not be any excess parking spaces
available for this development in the future.
The site is located at the intersection of two major streets (Hualapai Way and Deer Springs
Way), both of which will be improved adjacent to the development. Freeway access to Clark
County 215 is available at the Hualapai Way interchange. Parcels are undeveloped in every
direction from the site. The Providence Master Planned Community is located to the west, an
undeveloped property zoned for commercial uses is located to the east, the Clark County 215
Beltway right-of-way is located to the south, and undeveloped low density residential parcels in
both the City and County jurisdictions are located to the north of Deer Springs Way.
A General Plan Amendment (GPA-64811) to change the land use designation to SC (Service
Commercial) and a Rezoning (ZON-64812) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on Assessors Parcel
Number 125-19-301-001 were approved by the City Council on 09/07/16, as well as a two-lot
Tentative Map (TMP-64814) for a commercial subdivision that spans this site and the lot to the
SS

east of this site. This commercial development is proposed on the westernmost commercial lot
only. A final map must still be recorded to consolidate the existing parcels that make up this
property. Improvements on Inyo Avenue were deferred until the time of development through
TMP-64814.
Use Definitions and Conditions per LVMC Title 19
Grocery Store With Alcohol
A Grocery Store is defined by Title 19.18 as A business establishment which occupies all of the
business premises of a building or a portion of the business premises of a building which is
segregated physically or spatially from the rest of the business premises, and which contains
more than five thousand square feet of floor space, exclusive of warehouse and office space, for
the display and sale of foodstuffs, whether fresh, frozen, canned or packaged, and may include
the sales of other products, including non-food items, alcoholic beverages (if licensed by the City
for the sale of alcoholic beverages) and pharmaceuticals, provided the sale of such
pharmaceuticals is incidental to the primary business of selling products other than
pharmaceuticals. The proposed grocery store would be located on the east side of the lot, would
contain 57,884 square feet and sell alcoholic beverages in the form of beer, wine and packaged
liquor.
When alcohol is sold, Title 19.12.070 describes this use as a Grocery Store:
1. Whose license to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and not for
resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for consumption off the premises where the same
are sold; and
2. In which the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the grocery store use, and in which no
more than 10 percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages. This use includes an establishment that provides onpremises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting if the licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur
tasting license for that location.
This use is conditional in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. As this proposed
Grocery Store with Alcohol will contain greater than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, the
minimum 400-foot distance separation requirements do not apply, although it currently meets
such requirements (i.e., from a church/house of worship, school, individual care center or city
park). All other conditional use regulations will be met by the proposed Grocery Store.
Drive-Through
Title 19.18 defines this use as the use of a dedicated drive lane that, incidental to a principal
use, provides access to a station, such as a window, door or mechanical device, from which
occupants of a motor vehicle receive or obtain a product or service. This use is conditional in
SS

the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Drive-throughs are proposed both around a
proposed automated car wash and fast food restaurant. Both stacking lanes will accommodate at
least six vehicles, as shown on the site plan.
Car Wash, Full Service
The Car Wash, Full Service use is defined as An establishment that provides for the washing,
cleaning, waxing or detailing of passenger vehicles, either by means of employees or by means
of automated or semi-automated methods of cleaning, or by a combination thereof. The
proposed use meets the definition, as an automated mechanism will be housed to the east of the
5,075 square-foot convenience store (General Retail Store) establishment for the purpose of
cleaning and waxing of vehicles. Two parking spaces are reserved for vacuuming of vehicles.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement for this use is the following:
1. Each wash bay shall have a stacking lane that will accommodate at least six cars.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as a single wash bay will be provided with a
stacking lane that wraps around the proposed convenience store building and which
supports six vehicles in queuing position.
The use can be accessed from any of the driveways on the site; however, vehicles enter the 12foot wide wash bay drive-through lane from the west. The drive-through is adequately screened
from the adjacent parking area by landscaping consisting of shrubs and Mexican fan palms. The
wash bay faces Deer Springs Way, which requires a waiver through the accompanying Site
Development Plan Review.
Liquor Establishment (Tavern)
The Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is defined as a facility which sells alcoholic beverages
for consumption on the premises where the same are sold and authorizes the sale, to consumers
only and not for resale, of alcoholic beverages in original sealed or corked containers, for
consumption off the premises where the same are sold. The proposed use meets the definition,
as the establishment intends to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises.
1. Pursuant to its general authority to regulate the sale of alcoholic beverages, the City
Council declares that the public health, safety and general welfare of the City are best
promoted and protected by generally requiring both a minimum separation between
liquor establishments (tavern), and a minimum separation between a liquor establishment
(tavern) and certain other uses that should be protected from the impacts associated with
SS

a liquor establishment (tavern). Therefore, except as otherwise provided below, no liquor

establishment (tavern) may be located within 1500 feet of any other liquor establishment
(tavern), church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than
12 children, or City park. (NONWAIVABLE)
The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected uses within 1,500 feet
of the subject site.
2. The distance separation referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured with reference to
the shortest distance between two property lines, one being the property line of the
proposed liquor establishment (tavern) which is closest to the existing use to which the
measurement pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use which is
closest to the proposed liquor establishment (tavern). The distance shall be measured in a
straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. (NONWAIVABLE)
Measurement is taken from the boundaries of the 9.27-acre commercial subdivision lot as
approved through TMP-64814.
3. For the purpose of Requirement 2, and for that purpose only:
a. The property line of a protected use refers to the property line of a fee interest
parcel that has been created by an approved and recorded parcel map or
subdivision map, and does not include the property line of a leasehold parcel; and
b. The property line of a liquor establishment (tavern) refers to:
i. The property line of a parcel that has been created by an approved and
recorded parcel map or commercial subdivision map; or
ii. The property line of a parcel that is located within an approved and
recorded commercial subdivision and that has been created by a record of
survey or legal description, if:
A. Using the property line of that parcel for the purpose of measuring
the distance separation referred to in Requirement 1 would qualify
the parcel under the distance separation requirement;
B. The proposed liquor establishment (tavern) will have direct access
(both ingress and egress) from a street having a minimum right-ofway width of 100 feet. The required access may be shared with a
larger development but must be located within the property lines of
the parcel on which the proposed liquor establishment (tavern) will
be located;
C. All parking spaces required by this Subchapter 19.12.070 for the
liquor establishment (tavern) use will be located on the same parcel
as the use; and
SS

D. The owners of all parcels within the commercial subdivision,

including the owner of agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney,
that provides for perpetual, reciprocal cross-access, ingress and
egress throughout the commercial subdivision. (NONWAIVABLE)
A commercial subdivision map is expected to be recorded that creates a 9.27-acre lot by
which measurement to protected uses is taken. Future record of survey lines may be
recorded that may or may not capture all measurement requirements in Subparagraphs
A-D.
4. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 does not apply to an
establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992.
This requirement does not apply, as neither circumstance applies to the subject
establishment.
5. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 may be waived in
accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), but only in connection with a
proposed liquor establishment (tavern) that:
a. Will be located on a parcel within the C-V District, the Parkway Center District
within the Downtown Centennial Plan, the Gaming Enterprise Overlay District, or
the Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. Will be located on a parcel or within a building that, pursuant to State law or City
ordinance, has been designated as an historic property, historic building, or
landmark;
c. Will be located within a regional mall; or
d. Will be located within a mixed-use development
i. That has been approved by means of Special Use Permit pursuant to
LVMC Chapters 19.12 and 19.16;
ii. That has a minimum net site area of 15 acres; and
iii. Whose gross floor area of nonresidential space is a minimum of 250,000
square feet; or
e. Will be separated from the existing use by a street or highway with a minimum
right-of-way width of 100 feet.
This requirement does not apply, as no waiver of distance separation is necessary.
6. The use shall conform to, and is subject to, the provisions of LVMC Chapters 6.40 and
6.50. (NONWAIVABLE)
SS

The proposed use is required to comply with this requirement as a condition of approval.
The proposed Tavern would be located in a 4,000 square-foot tenant space at the west end of the
Shops A building. All distance separation requirements are met by the proposed use. The
Tavern would contain two kitchens, a lounge with 22 seats and 15 machines and a dining area
with 28 seats. All minimum special use permit conditions can be met by the proposed Tavern.
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment
The Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use is defined by Title 19.18 as an establishment whose license
to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers to consumers only and
not for resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for consumption off the premises where
the same are sold, and is operated in connection with a grocery store, drug store, convenience
store or specialty merchandise store. The proposed use meets the definition, as only beer, wine
and wine coolers are proposed to be sold in connection with a convenience store in their original
sealed containers for off-premises consumption. The floor plan indicates that beer, wine and
wine coolers would be located within a bank of coolers along the south side of the store.
1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment (hereinafter
establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park. (nonwaivable)
The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected uses within 400 feet
of the subject site.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance
shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes
of measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels
and does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for onsite parking
and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in
Requirement 1. (nonwaivable)
Measurement is taken from the boundaries of the 9.27-acre commercial subdivision lot as
approved through TMP-64814.
SS


size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
(nonwaivable)
This requirement does not apply, as the parcel is less than 80 acres in size.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.
5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms n or before July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor
space.
Neither condition above applies to this request; therefore, the minimum distance
requirements apply.
Chapter 6.50. (nonwaivable)
The proposed use is required to comply with this requirement as a condition of approval.
7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:
a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any establishment
which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the Downtown Casino Overlay
District;
SS

b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Town Center Development

Standards Manual for any establishment which is proposed to be located within
the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is designated MS-TC (Main
Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square feet
and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10 percent of the retail
floor space is regularly devoted to the display or merchandising of alcoholic
beverages; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square feet of
retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or merchandising of
alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are separated by a highway or a
right-of-way with a width of at least 100 feet.
8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to the
Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.
This requirement does not apply, as the proposed use would not be located on or
adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall.
Variance and Waivers
The Shops A building is located adjacent to the drainage channel located within the Clark
County 215 right-of-way. The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district requires a 20-foot rear
yard setback; however, 15 feet is being provided, as according to the applicant, moving the
building an additional five feet to the north would eliminate a row of parking that is necessary to
meet parking requirements. A nine-foot sidewalk abuts the building on all sides. Staff does not
support the variance, as there are no physical constraints to the property and this building or
other planned buildings could be reduced or otherwise reconfigured on the site to both retain the
building and meet parking requirements.
Title 19.08.040(B)(6) requires buildings on corner lots to be oriented to the setback lines to form
a street edge. The proposed convenience store is designed to be located away from the corner,
with an open fuel canopy occupying the corner. The applicant requests that a waiver allowing
this design be approved for purposes of maintaining visibility and functionality for the shopping
center tenants and customers. As this is the first development in what is expected to be a large
commercial center on vacant land, it sets a precedent for a similar pattern of future development
along Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. As there are no extraordinary circumstances with
the land that would preclude the building from being situated at the corner, staff recommends
that the waiver be denied.
SS

The proposed car wash bay faces Deer Springs Way where bay openings are required to be
oriented away from public rights-of-way per Title 19.08.040(B)(4). The applicant has requested
to waive this standard, as the bay opening would face one of the two perimeter streets regardless
of the design, and would not face any residential uses. However, if the convenience store and
wash bay were rotated 90 degrees, the orientation would be less likely to negatively impact
future residential development across from this site, given that Hualapai Way will be improved
to at least 100 feet in width. The layout as currently submitted is not sufficiently screened from
street views, as a five-foot landscape buffer is proposed along Deer Springs Way across from the
wash bay. Staff recommends denial of this waiver.
Perimeter landscape buffer widths are substandard along all sides of the development. The east
perimeter is devoid of landscaping in anticipation of a future commercial development and
shared vehicular access between this site and the parcel to the east, which will be part of the
same commercial subdivision. An eight-foot buffer that narrows down to five feet is proposed to
be provided along the south property line adjacent to the Clark County 215 right-of-way and
intervening drainage channel. The applicant claims that the narrower landscape buffer widths
along portions of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way where 15 feet is required are justified, as
a detached sidewalk and additional landscaping will be provided in the amenity zones, and
additional right-of-way is requested for a right turn lane. Staff agrees that the landscaping
abutting Clark County 215 is not visible from the freeway and would serve little purpose, and
would support a waiver of the eight-foot buffer requirement; however, the lack of landscaping
along the east property line is the result of a self-created hardship executed through the previous
request for a two-lot subdivision in which the shopping center will have perpetual cross access
between lots, and there is no basis on which staff can recommend approval of a waiver. Along
public rights-of-way, Title 19 requires 15 feet of landscaping in addition to streetscape required
for shading of sidewalks and protection of pedestrians and bicyclists.
Other Issues
Hualapai Way is classified as a Primary Arterial street. Complete Streets Standards require a
five-foot sidewalk and a three-foot amenity zone with trees 45 feet on center. The landscape
plan indicates that a five-foot detached sidewalk and 5.5-foot amenity zone will be provided,
with only five-gallon shrubs to be planted. A condition of approval will require that 24-inch box
shade trees be provided within the amenity zone at least 45 feet on center in conformance with
Complete Streets Standards.
Deer Springs Way is classified as a Major Collector street. Complete Streets Standards require a
five-foot sidewalk and a three-foot amenity zone with trees 40 feet on center. The landscape
plan indicates that a five-foot detached sidewalk and 3.5-foot amenity zone will be provided,
with only five-gallon shrubs planted. A condition of approval will require that 24-inch box
shade trees be provided within the amenity zone at least 40 feet on center in conformance with
Complete Streets Standards.
SS

Additional trees are required within the perimeter landscape buffers. The deficiency is the result
of spacing trees too far apart. Trees must be spaced no further apart than 20 feet along Deer
Springs Way and Hualapai Way and 30 feet in the buffer along the south property line. An
Exception from these standards was not requested; therefore, a condition of approval addresses
this deficiency.
Portions of the parking areas directly face Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. These rows of
parking must be adequately screened from rights-of-way by a low wall or berm, low hedge or
other screening acceptable to the Department of Planning. The site plan and/or landscape plan
must be revised to indicate how parking will be screened.
Freestanding pylon signs are indicated at the access driveways from the perimeter streets. A
monument sign is also proposed at the corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. Signs
will be reviewed for conformance to Title 19 standards under separate permit.
The development overall is suitable for this site, as it is located at the corner of two planned
major thoroughfares and backs up to a freeway. However, the building configuration and design
elements are conducive only to automobile and truck traffic and little consideration is given to
other modes of transportation. In addition, this project is projected to strain Hualapai Way
beyond traffic handling capacity. As the first commercial development proposed in this area, the
proposal is not the model for the future pattern of development along these corridors; staff
therefore recommends denial of all applications, with conditions if approved.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
SS

has created a self-imposed hardship by situating the proposed Shops A building in such a way
that the other buildings and required parking spaces cannot otherwise be provided to code
standards. Reduction of building size or reconfiguration of the other buildings and parking area
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.
1.
The proposed use can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the
existing and future development within the surrounding area. However, as staff
recommends denial of the companion Site Development Plan Review application, staff
also recommends that this Special Use Permit request be denied. It is noted that as part of
that review, staff also recommends denial of a waiver request to allow the wash bay to face
Deer Springs Way where such openings shall not face public rights-of-way.
2.
The Shopping Center site covers 9.27 acres and will have access on three sides. Sufficient
parking is provided to meet the needs of the proposed Car Wash, Full Service use.
3.
Hualapai Way is classified as a Primary Arterial and Deer Springs Way is classified as a
Major Collector. Both roadways are adequate in size to meet the needs of the proposed
Car Wash, Full Service use.
4.
General Plan.
SS

Staff Report Page Thirteen
The proposed Car Wash, Full Service use will be subject to building permit and licensing
review and inspections, thereby safeguarding the health, safety and welfare of the public,
as well as the objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The proposed site meets the minimum six-car stacking requirement of Title 19.12.
1.
The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use would be located within a multitenant
building with similar commercial uses that is proposed adjacent to a future commercial
center to the east and undeveloped parcels to the north and west. In addition to meeting all
distance separation requirements, the proposed location abuts the Clark County 215 rightof-way and is oriented toward the interior of the shopping center. The Tavern can
therefore be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the adjacent
uses. However, as staff recommends denial of the companion Site Development Plan
Review application, staff also recommends that this Special Use Permit request be denied.
2.
parking is provided to meet the needs of the proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use.
3.
Car Wash, Full Service use.
4.
General Plan.
SS

Staff Report Page Fourteen
The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use will be subject to building permit and
licensing review and inspections, thereby safeguarding the health, safety and welfare of the
public, as well as the objectives of the General Plan.
5.
All distance separation requirements and licensing code requirements will be met by the
proposed Tavern use.
1.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment would be operated within a
proposed convenience store in a commercial shopping center along two major
thoroughfares. It can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with
surrounding land uses; however, as staff recommends denial of the companion Site
Development Plan Review application, staff also recommends that the Special Use Permit
request be denied.
2.
parking is provided to meet the needs of the car wash and convenience store apart from the
fuel stations.
3.
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.
4.
General Plan.
SS

Staff Report Page Fifteen
The proposed alcohol use will be subject to routine inspection for compliance, thereby
safeguarding the public health, safety and welfare.
5.
No protected uses are located within 400 feet of the subject property. Other requirements
either do not apply or are enforced through conditions of approval.
1.

The shopping center use is appropriate for this location; however, the building and parking
configuration and landscaping design do not conform to Title 19 standards, which are
intended to improve aesthetics and provide amenities for other modes of transportation.
2.
The proposed shopping center requires a rear setback variance and waivers of building
placement, car wash bay orientation and perimeter landscape buffer widths, most of which
staff cannot support, as there is no sufficient justification based on the physical
characteristics of the land to warrant these deviations. Parking and uses will be consistent
with the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district and SC (Service Commercial) General
Plan Designation.
3.

Site access will be taken from one driveway from Hualapai Way and two driveways from
Deer Springs Way, designated as a Primary Arterial and Major Arterial, respectively.
Each access will be right-in, right-out. Access is also proposed at the eastern boundary of
the site along Deer Springs Way, to be shared with a future commercial development.
Improvements will be made pending results of a Traffic Impact Analysis. According to
the Department of Public Works, this project will add approximately 9,637 trips per day on
SS

Staff Report Page Sixteen
Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. Currently, Deer Springs Way is at about 17 percent
of capacity and Hualapai Way is at about 77 percent of capacity. With this project, Deer
Springs Way is expected to be at about 79 percent of capacity and Hualapai Way to be
over capacity.
4.
Building materials include painted stucco exteriors, stone veneer accents, clay tile roofs,
metal awnings and precast columns. These materials are typical of shopping centers and
are appropriate for this area. Landscape materials are drought tolerant and appropriate for
this location. Additional trees and shrubs shall be provided in the north and south
landscape buffers.
5.

The proposed building elevations are typical of those for shopping centers in the nearby
Town Center area, with arched walkways, varied rooflines with cornices, and popouts at
storefronts. The outlying pad buildings are compatible with the larger anchor buildings in
terms of architectural style. Overall, the elevations are sensitive to development in the
area, which is primarily residential in character.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection, thereby protecting
the public health, safety and general welfare.
generally located north of Centennial Parkway between Shaumber Road and
02/07/07
Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The annexation became effective 02/16/07.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-20465) from R
(Rural Density Residential) to PCD (Planned Community Development) on
06/06/07
23.30 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of Hualapai Way. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
SS

Staff Report Page Seventeen

[PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan designation] to PD
(Planned Development) on 23.62 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of
Hualapai Way, which included the Providence Square Master Development
Plan and Design Standards. The Planning Commission recommended
approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-25759) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located east of Hualapai Way, south
of Deer Springs Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The approval expired 04/16/11.
for a proposed 205,000 square-foot commercial development on 23.62 acres
at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The
Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The approval expired 04/16/12.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-28087) U.S.
Government Patent Easements east of Hualapai Way, south of Deer Springs
Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
approval expired 08/07/11.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-49489) from
PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) on 7.97 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
08/06/08
approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-49494) from PD (Planned
Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 7.97 acres on the
south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai
Way. The Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended
denial.
PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
03/18/15
Residential) on 10.42 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Rezoning request from PD (Planned
Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 10.42 acres on the
05/20/15
south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai
Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission voted to withdraw without prejudice a Tentative
Map (TMP-58507) for a 58-lot single family residential subdivision on 10.42
07/14/15
acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of
Hualapai Way at the applicants request. Staff had recommended approval.
SS

Staff Report Page Eighteen

The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-60834) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located south of Deer Springs Way,
10/13/15
east of Hualapai Way. An Order of Relinquishment of Interest has not been
recorded and the approval will expire 10/13/16 unless recorded or an
extension of time has been filed before expiration.
ML (Medium Low Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial)
[amended from the original request of GC (General Commercial)] on 10.42
acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the SC
designation; staff recommended denial.
11/18/15
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-60636) from R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) to C-1 (Service Commercial) [amended from the
original request of C-2 (General Commercial)] on 10.42 acres on the south
side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the C-1 designation; staff
recommended denial.

The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA64811) from PCD (Planned Community Development) to SC (Service
Commercial) on 4.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-64812) from PD
(Planned Development) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 4.27 acres at the
09/07/16
southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning
The City Council approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-64814) for a
two-lot commercial subdivision on 14.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer
Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff
The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to hold VAR-66443, SUP-66444,
10/11/16
SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447 in abeyance to the November 1,
2016 Planning Commission meeting at the applicants request.

06/20/16
SS

Staff Report Page Nineteen

There are no relevant building permits or licenses related to this site.
Application requirements for a Site Development Plan Review were
discussed. It was determined at this meeting that a setback variance and three
08/16/16
Special Use Permits would also be required. A neighborhood meeting was
strongly recommended, as the residents in the area have not yet seen the
proposed plans for the shopping center.
A neighborhood meeting was voluntary but strongly recommended, based on the previous
reaction of residents to the preceding General Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Tentative Map
applications. A voluntary meeting was held 09/28/16 at the Centennial Hills Community Center
YMCA, 6601 North Buffalo Drive to discuss neighbors concerns related to the current requests.
Field Check
09/01/16
The site is undeveloped and contains natural vegetation. The rear of the
property abuts a drainage channel and the Clark County 215 Freeway.

Site Area
Gross Acres
9.27
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
CC 215 Beltway
East
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
RL (Residential Low)
Clark County
Designation
ROW (Right-of-Way)
SC (Service
Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-E (Residence Estates)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County Designation
ROW (Right-of-Way)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SS

Staff Report Page Twenty
Surrounding
Property
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)

PD (Planned
Development)
Master Plan Areas

Trails (Beltway Trail)
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Area
N/A
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
Side
10 Feet
Corner
10 Feet
20 Feet
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
N/A
Trash Enclosure
Mech. Equipment
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Roof or Trellis
Screened
Provided
403,801 SF
630 Feet
Compliance
N/A
Y
15 Feet
27 Feet
37 Feet
15 Feet
25.9 %
46 Feet
Screened, Gated, w/
a Roof; do not face
rights-of-way
Parapet screened
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N/A

Residential Adjacency Standards
Required/Allowed
3:1 proximity slope
96 Feet
Adjacent development matching setback
10 Feet
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
Provided
95 Feet
15 Feet
130 Feet
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
SS

Staff Report Page Twenty One

Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
19 Trees
South
19 Trees
East
19 Trees
West
25 Trees
82 Trees
Parking Area Trees
102 Trees

Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
South
8 Feet
East
8 Feet
15 Feet
West
Wall Height
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Hualapai Way
Primary Arterial
Deer Springs Way
Major Collector
Governing Document
and Highways Map
and Highways Map
Provided
Compliance
15 Trees
15 Trees
0 Trees
29 Trees
59 Trees
N
N
N
Y
N
89 Trees
Provided
Compliance
15 Feet
5 Feet
0 Feet
15 Feet
None
Y
N
N
Y
N/A
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
50
32
SS

Staff Report Page Twenty Two
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
Number of
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
Units
capped
capped
1 space
Shopping
100,719 SF
per 250
403
Center
SF GFA
403
403
Y
394
9
393
10
Y
3, plus 1
per each
Loading
100,719 SF
100,000
4
6
Y
Spaces
SF over
50,000 SF
Waivers
Requirement
Buildings on corner lots shall be
oriented to the corner and street
fronts
8-foot perimeter landscape buffer
shall be provided along all interior
property lines
Openings to service or wash bay
doors shall not face public rightsof-way and shall be designed to
minimize the visual intrusion into
adjoining properties
Exceptions
Requirement
One 24-inch box shade tree for
every six uncovered spaces in
parking areas in islands, plus one
tree at the ends of each parking
row
(102 trees required)
Request
To allow the proposed
convenience store to be set back
from the corner (fuel canopy
would occupy the corner)
To allow a 5-foot perimeter
landscape buffer along a portion of
the south property line
To allow a single car wash bay to
face a public right-of-way (Deer
Springs Way)
Request
To allow 89 parking lot trees
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
SS
VAR-66443
b777A7
A77
A77
777
A77
A7b77777A7AAA7
77
77A
A777
77
A7777
77A77
b
777
7777
777
7A7
A7
A777
77
A777
A7A7
77777
A7b7
A77
A77
A77
A77
A77
777
7b
777
7A7
7777
7b7
77
77
77
77
77
VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447
77A 7
777
b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777D7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
D77
7A
7777b7
777
A7
77A777b7
77A777
A7A77
bA7A7
b7
A77
7b7
7A7 D
77A 7
777
VAR-66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 and SDR-66447 - REVISED
VAR-66443 [PRJ-66309] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-66444, SUP-66445, SUP-66446 AND SDR66447 - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DEER SPRINGS WAY AND HUALAPAI WAY
09/01/16
09/01/16
09/01/16
09/01/16
09/01/16
09/01/16
09/01/16

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-66444 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE at the southeast corner
of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
11
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-66444

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-66445 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443 AND SUP66444 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A 4,000 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way
(APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309].
13
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
4. Protest Postcards - SUP-66445 and SUP-66446 [PRJ-66309]

paper use, backup
SUP-66445

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-66446 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-66443, SUP-66444
AND SUP-66445 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A 5,075 SQUARE-FOOT
BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT at the southeast corner of Deer Springs
Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
13
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map

paper use, backup
SUP-66446

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-66447 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR66443, SUP-66444, SUP-66445 AND SUP-66446 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 100,719 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING
CENTER WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW BUILDINGS TO NOT BE ORIENTED TO THE
CORNER AND STREET FRONTAGE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW A FIVEFOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH AND
WEST PROPERTY LINES AND A TWO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER
ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED,
TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO ALLOW A CAR WASH BAY TO FACE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED on 9.27 acres at the southeast
corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66309]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
11
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Support Postcard
4. Protest/Support Postcards

paper use, backup
SDR-66447

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
MOD-66820 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Major Modification of the Lone Mountain West Land Use Plan FROM: L
(LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on
5.00 acres on the north side of Buckskin Avenue, approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows
Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-66760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
1. Location and Aerial Maps - MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]
3. Supporting Documentation - MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]
4. Photo(s) - MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]
5. Justification Letter - MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]
6. Protest Postcard - MOD-66820 and VAR-66821 [PRJ-66760]
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 [PRJ-66760]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
MOD-66820
VAR-66821

conditions:
MOD-66820
SDR-66761

conditions:
MOD-66820
VAR-66821
** NOTIFICATION **
25
NOTICES MAILED
337 - MOD-66820 and VAR-66821

337 - SDR-66761
APPROVALS
0 - MOD-66820 and VAR-66821

0 - SDR-66761
PROTESTS
1 - MOD-66820 and VAR-66821

1 - SDR-66761
FS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Review (SDR-66761) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
SDR-66761CONDITIONS
Planning
1.

shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan date stamped
10/10/16, and building elevations, date stamped 09/20/16, except as amended by conditions
herein.
FS

Conditions Page Two
4.
5.
A Waiver from the Lone Mountain West Development Standards is hereby approved, to
allow up to16-foot tall retaining walls where three-foot six is the maximum allowed.
6.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot perimeter landscape
waiver along portions of the east and west property lines.
7.
An Exception from 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow zero parking lot landscape islands
were one is required.
8.
Trash enclosures shall be roofed and enclosed per Title 19.08 standards.
9.
Reflective building materials are not permitted unless treated to eliminate glare.
10.
Mechanical equipment shall be screened per the Lone Mountain West and Hillside Overlay
development standards.
11.
All walls, including retaining walls, shall either incorporate the use of native materials or
be earth tone colors to match the native soils and rocks.
12.
Solid walls and fences shall be prohibited within fifty vertical feet of a ridgeline in order to
prevent impacts on wildlife corridors and maintain the natural area surrounding the
ridgeline
13.
In cases where there are multiple-stepped retaining walls, a minimum of five shrubs of a
five-gallon size, and five shrubs of a one-gallon size, for each twenty feet of linear planting
area shall be planted in the area between the walls and at the base of the lowest wall. A
minimum planting area of four feet is required between the retaining walls. Shrub types
shall comply with the requirements of the Lone Mountain West and Hillside Overlay
standards.
14.
Fences that have pointed vertical elements shall not be permitted.
15.
Safety.
16.
The minimum distance between buildings shall be 10 feet.
17.
Per Title 19.10.140, any areas designated as a natural area shall be shown on the tentative
subdivision map with the existing surveyed topographical information, and the area itself
shall be identified with horizontal control data on the final subdivision map or parcel map.
FS

18.
Within areas designated as natural areas, site disturbance, other than for the construction of
hiking trails, is not permitted.
19.
Each natural area shall contain only those species that are indigenous to the native desert or
mountain elevation and climate zone in which it exists.
20.
The use of non-native or competitive species that could threaten the native flora within the
area is prohibited. Landscaping shall be designed so as to avoid invasive species that
could negatively impact indigenous plant species. Invasive species shall be identified
through a recognized resource, such as a local Cooperative Weed Management Area
21.

changes from the conceptual landscape plan: Replace the Canary Island Palm Trees with a
tree species on the approved Lone Mountain West Appendix B.
22.
In order to meet the perimeter landscape buffer requirements of Title 19.08, three
additional 24-inch box trees are required along the south property line (nine trees total
along this property line).
23.
24.
Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the subject site.
A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future building permit
applications related to the site.
25.
Public Works
26.
Dedicate 30-feet of right-of-way and the right-of-way required for the northern half of the
terminating cul-de-sac adjacent to this site for Buckskin Avenue on the Final Map for this
site. Additionally, grant an Equestrian Trail Easement along the eastern portion of this site,
acceptable to both the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department, to be
privately maintained by the Homeowners Association on the Final Map for this site.
FS

27.
Construct the required Equestrian Trail, acceptable to both the Department of Public Works
and the Planning Department, on the east side of this site concurrent with on-site
development activities.
28.
In accordance with Title 13.56.040, remove all substandard public street improvements and
unused driveway cuts on Buckskin Avenue adjacent to this site and replace with new
improvements meeting current City Standards concurrent with development of this site.
All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
29.
Grant a 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement over the proposed public sewer connection on
the Final Map for this site. No trees or landscaping over 3-feet tall and no structures shall
be allowed within the Public Sewer Easement. Contact the Sanitary Sewer Planning
Section of the Department of Public Works at 702-229-6541 for details on Public Sewer
Easement dimensions.
30.
31.
Fire Services.
32.
An update to the previously approved Master Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to
and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or
grading permits or the submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Comply with the recommendations of the approved update to the Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the
approved Traffic Impact Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition
of approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development
of this site.
33.
FS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a 42-unit condominium development on five acres located on the north side of
Buckskin Avenue, approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows Parkway.
ISSUES
The subject site is located within the Hillside Overlay District.

A Major Modification is being requested to change the Lone Mountain West special land use
designation from L (Low Density Residential) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential).
Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance has been requested to allow a four-story, 64-foot tall building where two-stories
and 35 feet is the maximum allowed. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Variance has been requested to allow a site disturbance of 44 percent on slopes greater
than 25 percent where 35 percent is the maximum disturbance allowed, and to allow a 100
percent site disturbance on slopes between 15 and 25 percent where 50 percent is the
maximum disturbance allowed. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Site Development Plan Review is being requested for a 42-unit condominium
development. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Waiver is being requested from the Lone Mountain West development standards in
conjunction with the Site Development Plan Review to allow no perimeter buffer areas along
portions of the east and west property lines where six feet is required. Staff recommends
denial of the request.
A Waiver is being requested from the Lone Mountain West development standards in
conjunction with the Site Development Plan Review to allow 16-foot tall retaining walls
where 3 feet, six inches are the maximum permitted. Staff recommends denial of this
request.
A Multi-Use Equestrian Trail alignment is located along the east property line. Due to the
existing pedestrian facilities along Cliff Shadows Parkway, it has been determined that a tenfoot wide equestrian trail with no pedestrian or amenity areas is adequate for this portion of
the trail alignment. The trail provides adequate connectivity to Buckskin/Cliff Shadows Park
to the south of the subject site.
FS

ANALYSIS
The subject site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which guides development for
sites with vertical slopes greater than 15 percent. The district is intended to encourage and guide
low density, rural type, large lot or cluster, single family residential development that is designed
to be compatible with the hillside terrain and its environment. All development should be
designed to protect and conserve the natural state, while protecting from people and property
from potentially hazardous conditions that are particular to mountain and hillside areas. All
proposed development within the overlay district must obtain approval of a Hillside
Development Design Review prior to the submittal of entitlement applications. The review
consists of grading and drainage plans being submitted to the Department of Public Works to
ensure consistency with the Hillside Overlay requirements. The Hillside Development Design
Review (HIL-66341) for the subject site was approved by staff on September 8, 2016.
The applicant has requested a Major Modification of the Lone Mountain West land use plan
from L (Low Density Residential) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential). The MediumLow Density Residential category provides for the development of up to 12 dwelling units per
gross acre. This land use category allows for higher density detached, single-family product
types including, but not limited to, compact lots and zero lot line, and two story buildings.
While maximum density is established by the underlying master or special area plan designation,
the maximum recommended density within the Hillside Overlay District is two units per acre and
the preferred housing type is large lot, single family detached residential. Higher density
attached products and commercial development are discouraged. The proposed Major
Modification to ML (Medium Low Density Residential) designation allows for a higher density
product that is not consistent with the intent of the overlay district, and as such, staff
recommends denial of the request.
The subject site is located on a parcel that has areas of vertical slope that exceed 15 percent. The
Hillside Overlay sets maximum site disturbance for areas with slopes greater than 15 percent in
order to protect the natural characteristics of the site. For slopes with grades between 15 and 25
percent, up to 50 percent site disturbance is allowed, and for slopes exceeding 25 percent, 35
percent site disturbance is allowed. A site disturbance exhibit was provided and shows site
disturbances that exceed the maximum allowed, and a Variance has been requested to provide
relief from these requirements. The provided exhibit shows a 100 percent site disturbance within
areas between 15 and 25 percent slope, and a 44 percent site disturbance for areas with a slope
exceeding 25 percent. Site disturbances that exceed the maximums allowed are indicative of the
site being overbuilt and being too intense for the Hillside Overlay District. Staff recommends
denial of the Variance request.
FS

The Site Development Plan Review request is for a 42-unit condominium development within
the Lone Mountain West Master Plan area and the Hillside Overlay District. The site receives
access via two gated drives from Buckskin Avenue. The site utilizes both garage and surface
parking to provide 84 spaces. There are two proposed residential buildings and an amenity area
consisting of a pool and spa. The wall details depict a maximum of 16-foot retaining walls along
the northern portion of the developed area where three feet, six inches is the maximum allowed.
Along the east and west property lines, the wall details depict eight-foot retaining walls where
three feet, six inches are the maximum allowed. The applicant has requested a Waiver from the
Lone Mountain West development standards to allow retaining walls up to 16 feet tall and staff
The retaining walls are stepped back to offset the visual impacts of a sheer wall; however, the
provided wall details do not indicate landscaping for the wall step backs. The Lone Mountain
West development standards defer to Title 19.08 for retaining wall landscape requirements. Title
19.08 requires the installation of five gallon shrubs every 20 feet within the step back. A
condition of approval has been added to ensure compliance with these landscaping requirements.
The landscape plan depicts fairly dense landscape within the developed interior of the site. Trees
utilized include 24-inch box Blue Palo Verdes, Desert Acacia, Desert Willows and Canary Island
Palms with various five and one gallon shrubs. The Canary Island Palms are not on the Lone
Mountain West approved list of the tree species, and a condition of approval has been included
to replace the palms with an approved tree. The parking lot lacks the required landscape island
and 24-inch box tree and an Exception from Title 19.08 has been requested to provide relief from
these requirements. There are 30 uncovered parking spaces and an adequate number of parking
lot trees have been provided adjacent to the parking areas.
The northern portion of the site is being left in its natural state given the steep slope of the
terrain. The south (front) property line has 20 feet of landscape buffer area, which exceeds the
minimum required by Title 19.08; however, the landscape plan shows six trees where nine are
required in this area. A condition of approval has been included to ensure the proper amount of
trees within the front yard buffer area. A Waiver has been requested to allow zero landscape
buffer along portions of the east and west property lines where six feet is required. The proposed
equestrian trail utilizes the space normally occupied by landscaping along the east property line,
and a drive isle abuts the retaining wall along the west property line. As the applicant is
proposing to overbuild the site, staff recommends denial of the Waiver request.
The provided floor plans depict two, three, and four bedroom units typical of a condominium
project. The building elevations depict a four story, 55-foot condominium building with a flat
roof and a stucco-sand finish. The first floor consists of a parking garage with colored concrete
and decorative metal accents, and the upper three floors consist of residential units. The Hillside
Overlay District restricts building height to two stories or 35 feet, and a building height Variance
has been requested to provide relief from this requirement. Staff recommends denial of the
request.
FS

A Multi-Use Equestrian Trail alignment extends south from Cliff Shadow Parkway, through a
portion of the adjacent parcel to the east, and runs south along the eastern property line of the
subject site. When adjacent to a roadway, a Multi-Use Equestrian Trail typically consists of a
30-foot cross section including a 10-foot pedestrian path, a five foot landscaped amenity zone, a
10-foot equestrian path, and a second five-foot landscaped amenity zone back of curb. The 2020
Master Plan Trails Element permits the Director of Planning allow an exemption from trail
standards if there are technical or physical barriers that produce an undue hardship on the entity
developing the trail. It has been determined that that an exemption of standards is warranted to
allow a 10-foot equestrian trail without the required pedestrian or amenity zones because of the
unique location of the alignment away from the public right-of-way, and the fact that there are
adequate pedestrian facilities on Cliff Shadows Parkway. A 10-foot trail is adequate to allow
equestrian access through the subject site while still providing connectivity between Buckskin
Park to the south and other horse facilities to the north.
In general, the proposed development does not meet the intent of the Hillside Overlay District or
the Lone Mountain West Master Plan area. Development within the overlay district is intended
to blend in with the natural environment with minimal grade and site disturbances. The
structures are to be situated in a manner that fit into the hillsides contour and relate to the form
of the terrain. Detached residential is the preferred housing type and densities greater than two
units per acre are discouraged. In contrast, the proposed development is a multi-family
residential product, exceeds site disturbance maximums outlined in Title 19.10, is designed with
little consideration of the existing terrain, and concentrates the majority of the development into
a small portion of the site instead of incorporating innovative design to utilize the hillside. View
corridors for the proposed development will generally consist of walls and other manmade
features with limited visibility of the surrounding natural area due to the low elevation of the
buildings. As the proposed development requires a number of Variances and Waivers, and does
not meet the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, staff recommends denial of the request.
FINDINGS (MOD-66820)
The applicant has requested a Major Modification to the Lone Mountain West land use plan from
L (Low Density Residential) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential). The Medium-Low
Density Residential category provides for the development of up to 12 dwelling units per gross
acre. While maximum density is established by the underlying master or special area plan
designation, the maximum recommended density within the Hillside Overlay District is two units
per acre and the preferred housing type is large lot, single family detached residential. Higher
density attached products and commercial development are discouraged. The proposed Major
Modification to ML (Medium Low Density Residential) designation allows for a higher density
product that is not consistent with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, and as such, staff
FS

1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by overbuilding the site by proposing a building height in
excess of Title 19.10 requirements and disturbing the areas with slopes greater than 15 percent in
excess of the maximum percentage allowed. Alternative design would allow conformance to the
Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is
thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1.

The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent office development and
undeveloped parcels, but it does not meet the intent of the Hillside Overlay District.
Consequently, staff is recommending denial of the Site Development Plan Review.
FS

2.
The proposal is not consistent with the Hillside Overlay District and the Lone Mountain
West development standards as evidenced by the requested Waivers and Variance
applications. Consequently, staff is recommending denial of the Site Development Plan
Review.
3.

The site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic.
4.
The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City.
5.

The building elevations are not unsightly in appearance; however, the building height
exceeds the maximum allowed within the Hillside Overlay District and therefore it is not
harmonious or compatible with development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
Development will be subject to building code requirements, permits and inspections,
thereby protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
11/04/98
The subject site was annexed into the city of Las Vegas [A-46-99(A)]
The City Council approved the Lone Mountain West Master Development
06/14/99
Plan and Design Standards.
FS


The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-12368) to allow 24-foot wide
07/19/06
private streets where 37 were required. Staff and the Planning Commission
recommended approval on 05/25/2006
09/06/06
to PD (Planned Development). Staff and the Planning Commission
09/06/06
for a 30-lot residential subdivision. Staff and the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-13793) for a 3110/19/06
lot residential subdivision. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Text Amendment (TXT-8744) to add
02/22/07
development standards for hillsides with slopes greater than 15 percent.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-28876) for a Site
08/20/08
Development Plan Review (SDR-11034) was approved for a 30-lot residential
subdivision. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-28877) for a Waiver
08/20/08
(WVR-12368) was approved to allow 24-foot wide private streets where 37
feet is required. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval
The Planning Department administratively approved an internal Hillside
09/08/16
Ordinance Review (HIL-66341).
07/27/16
Month/date/year Description
A neighborhood meeting was held and there were three members from the
public in attendance. The neighbors generally reacted in a positive manner to
10/20/16
the project, but some concerns such as traffic impacts and disruption of the
mountain views were raised. The general consensus was that this would be a
good project for the neighborhood.
Field Check
09/23/16
FS


Site Area
Gross Acres
5.00
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
Public Park
East
Office, Other than

Listed
West
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential) Lone
Mountain West Land
Use Designation
L (Low Density
Residential) Lone
Mountain West Land
Use Designation
OS-R (Open Space and
Recreation) Lone
Mountain West Land
Use Designation
VC (Village
Commercial) Lone
Mountain West Land
Use Designation
PF (Schools, Churches,
Public Facilities) Clark
County

PD (Planned
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
R-U (Rural Open Land)
Clark County
Master Plan Areas

Lone Mountain West
PD (Planned Development) District
HS-O (Hillside Overlay) District
Trails
Compliance
N
Compliance
Y
N
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
FS

Pursuant to Title 19.10 and the Lone Mountain West Development Standards, the following
standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front
15 Feet
20 Feet
Y
Side
10 Feet
36 Feet
Y
Corner
N/A
N/A Feet
Y
10 Feet
260 Feet
Y
Rear
10 Feet
35 Feet
Y
35 Feet
55 Feet
N
Screened, Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
Y
a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Y
Pursuant to the Lone Mountain West Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Open Space Standard
Required Open space
Provided
Open Compliance
space
330 SF per dwelling unit / 13,860 SF
38,855 SF
Y
42 Units
Pursuant to the Title 19.10, the following Hillside Overlay site disturbance standards apply:
Slope
Maximum Site
Site Disturbance
Compliance
Disturbance Allowed
Provided
0-15%
100%
100%
Y
15%-25%
50%
100%
N
Over 25%
35%
44%
N
Existing Special Plan

Designation
L (Low Density) Residential
Proposed Special Plan
Designation
ML (Medium Low Density)
Residential
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
6 units per acre
30
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
12 units per acre
60
FS

Pursuant to the Lone Mountain West Development Standards and Title 19.08, the following
standards apply:
Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
South
9 Trees
6 Trees
N
East
14 Trees
3 Trees
N
West
10 Trees
0 Trees
N
33 Trees
9 Trees
N
Parking Area Trees
5 Trees
6 Trees
Y
Spaces
Min. Zone Width
North
N/A
N/A
N/A
South
15 Feet
20 Feet
Y
East
6 Feet
0 Feet
N
6 Feet
0 Feet
N
West
Wall Height
Not Indicated
Y
Street Name
Buckskin Avenue
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
60-foot Residential
Street
Governing Document
19.04 Complete Streets
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
60
FS

Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
42 units (30 1.75 per 2
53
two bedroom, bedroom
12 two plus
bedrooms)
2 per more
24
Multi-Family
than two
Residential
bedrooms
1 visitor
space per
6 units
Waivers
Requirement
84
80
86
82
Y
Y
Three-foot, six inch maximum

retaining wall height.
Request
Allow zero perimeter
the east and west
property lines.
16-foot maximum
retaining walls
Exceptions
Requirement
One landscape island planted
with a 24-inch box tree for
every six spaces
Request
Allow no landscape
islands within the
parking lot.
Six-foot perimeter landscape

buffer planted with 24-inch box
trees 30 feet on-center.
Denial
Denial
Denial
FS
MOD-66820
MOD-66820
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761 - REVISED
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761
MOD-66820 [PRJ-66760] - MAJOR MODIFICATION RELATED TO VAR-66821 AND SDR-66761 APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
NORTH SIDE OF BUCKSKIN AVENUE, WEST OF CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY
09/26/16
09/26/16
09/26/16
777777777
A77
77777777
777
7
7,A
1
bA7
A77
77
b7
b1177b
A77 7
77A7777b
7
7A
777
77
777
7
7
777 77
7
77 7 7
77
7 7
7
7
7 7
7
7
,7 7
7
7
A777
7
7
7
7
777777
77777777
7177777 7
A7A7 7
A7A77
7
7
7777777
7
7
7
7
7777
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761
A7b77b
b71177b777777777
7777777777777
77777777777
177777777777777
77777777777777
777777777
77777717777
7777
777777777
7 A7777777777
7 77
A777777777
77
7 A777777777777
7777777
7 77777777777
777777777777
7
7 77777777777
77
777777777
7
A777777777777777
7777
b77
77777777b777
77A77777A777A7
777777
777
7 A7777777777
7 77777
1777777777777
777A7177777
1
77
A7
A77
MOD-66820, VAR-66821 and SDR-66761

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66821 - VARIANCE RELATED TO MOD-66820 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A PROPOSED FOURSTORY, 64-FOOT TALL BUILDING WHERE TWO STORIES AND 35 FEET IS THE
MAXIMUM ALLOWED, TO ALLOW A SITE DISTURBANCE OF 44 PERCENT ON
SLOPES GREATER THAN 25 PERCENT WHERE 35 PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM
DISTURBANCE ALLOWED, AND TO ALLOW A 100 PERCENT SITE DISTURBANCE
ON SLOPES BETWEEN 15 AND 25 PERCENT WHERE 50 PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM
DISTURBANCE ALLOWED on 5.00 acres on the north side of Buckskin Avenue,
approximately 350 feet west of Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [L (Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation]
[PROPOSED: ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-66760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-66821
VAR-66821

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66761 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-66820 AND
VAR-66821 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND ATLAS
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 42-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW 16-FOOT RETAINING WALLS WHERE THREE FEET, SIX
INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, AND TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE SIX
FEET IS REQUIRED on 5.00 acres on the north side of Buckskin Avenue, approximately 350
feet west of Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-12-301-009), PD (Planned Development) Zone
[L (Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation] PROPOSED: [ML
(Medium-Low Density Residential) Lone Mountain West Land Use Designation], Ward 4
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcard

paper use, backup
SDR-66761
SDR-66761
SDR 66761
Prometheus and Atlas Real Estate Development, LLC
North side of Buckskin Avenue, west of Cliff Shadows Parkway

Proposed 42 unit multi-family residential development.
Proposed Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
42
0.51
0.62
279
21
26

Cliff Shadows Parkway
14,175
1,134
Gilmore Avenue
616
49
Novat Street
1,138
91

Cliff Shadows Parkway
Gilmore Avenue
Novat Street

32,110
15,600
15,600
This project will add approximately 279 trips per day on Buckskin Ave., Cliff Shadows Pkwy., Gilmore Ave. and Novat St.
Currently, Cliff Shadows is at about 44 percent of capacity, Gilmore is at about 4 percent of capacity and Novat is at about
7 percent of capacity. With this project, Cliff Shadows is expected to be at about 45 percent of capacity, Gilmore to be at
about 6 percent of capacity and Novat to be at about 9 percent of capacity. Volumes are not available for Buckskin in this
vicinity, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 26 additional cars, or about one every two
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 11 PARKING SPACES WHERE
22 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.50 acres at 3808 Melody Lane (APN 139-19704-011), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66212]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to condtions:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66657
SDR-66658
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
VAR-66657
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
108
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
11
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Review (SDR-66658).
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.

shall be required.
2.
3.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

Conditions Page Two
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow 10-foot wide landscape buffer on
the east property line where a 15-foot wide landscape buffer required and zero-foot wide
landscape buffer on the north and the west where an eight-foot wide landscape buffer is
required.
5.
An Exception from 19.08.110 is hereby approved, to allow zero landscape islands where
one landscape island is required and to allow zero parking lot trees where one is required.
6.
An Exception from 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow 12 perimeter landscape buffer

trees where 19 perimeter landscape buffer trees are required.
7.
Safety.
8.
9.

10.
11.
Public Works
12.
Construct half-street improvements on Melody Lane meeting current City Standards with
appropriate transition paving concurrent with on-site development activities. All existing
paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location
and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
13.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

14.
The proposed gate shall remain open during normal business hours and shall not swing into
the public right-of-way.
15.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the City of Las Vegas Capital Projects Management Rancho Drive Capacity
Improvements - Bonanza to Decatur and ITS project, and any other public improvement
projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
16.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
17.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Variance to allow 11 parking spaces where 22 parking spaces are required
and a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 6,604 square-foot Building Maintenance
Service and Sales on a vacant property located at 3808 Melody Lane.
ISSUES
A Variance is required to allow 11 parking spaces where 22 are required. Staff does not
support this request.
Waivers are required to allow the landscape buffers at zero feet along a portion of the north
and the west property lines; and to allow a 10-foot along the east property line. Staff does
not support these requests.
An Exception is required to allow 12 landscape perimeter buffer trees where a total of 19
trees are required. Staff does not support this request.
An Exception is required to allow no parking lot trees and islands where one tree and island
are required for every six parking spaces. Staff does not support this request.
ANALYSIS
The proposed development is subject to Title 19 requirements for zoning and design and is not
part of any special plan area. The site falls within the 70-foot radius of the Airport Overlay
District and the height of the proposed structure is well within the height limitation. The
proposed development is subject to the requirements of the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district.
The proposed 6,604 square-foot building contains three multi-tenant suites intended for a
Building Maintenance Service and Sales use. The proposed development does not meet Title
19.08.080, Landscape Buffers, and the applicant is requesting Waivers to allow zero feet along a
portion of the perimeter landscape buffers along the north and west property lines where eight
feet is required; and a Waiver to allow 10 feet along the east property lines where 15 feet is
required. In addition, the applicant is requesting exceptions of the quantity of the landscape
materials and the Parking Lot Island and tree requirements withinthe perimeter landscape buffers
provided, the number of threes required has been limited to 12 trees where 19 trees are required
for the overall development. The shrubs provided are adequate in quantities for the provide trees
for the site. The primary tree species being utilized are 24 box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box
Mondel Pine and 24 box Chilean Mesquite.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

The faade of the building utilizes Concrete Masonry Unit or CMU on all sides. Two types of
CMU for the building faade material that are split face CMU and fluted split CMU in chocolate
and tan colors respectively. The buildings front entrances incorporate aluminum storefront with
dark bronze frame with clear glazing and metal roofing with colonial red color. In addition, each
of the front entrances has a metal roll-up overhead door in desert tan color. The secondary doors
located on the north side of the building consist of a steel door with dark bronze color.
The subject property has a lot width of approximately 97 feet; C-2 (General Commercial)
standards require a minimum width of 100 feet. The subject property has been zoned C-2 and
pursuant to Title 19.14 is identified as a legal nonconforming property.
The applicant is requesting a Variance for the required parking. The proposed 6,604 square-foot
Building Maintenance Service and Sales Building requires 22 parking spaces; however, only 11
spaces are provided. The proposed a site has insufficient parking with a 50% deviation from
standard parking requirements. Staff does not support this request.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) has provided comment for this parcel and is
located within the LVVWD service area, but is not served by LVVWD. It is served by the
Eastland Water Association, a quasi-municipal well.
The Department of Public Works has provided the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts, for this
development will have 282 cars per day on Melody Lane, Primrose Path and Rancho Drive.
Rancho Drive is at 95 percent of capacity. With this development, Rancho Drive is expected to
be at about 96 percent of capacity. However, volumes are not available for Melody Lane and
Primrose Path, but they are believed to be under capacity. Based on Peak Hour use, this
development will add into the area roughly 25 additional cars, or about one every two minutes.
The proposed development does not meet all Title 19 requirements. The proposed development
does not meet the minimum parking requirements and a Variance application is required in
addition to the Site Development Plan Review. A Waiver of the perimeter landscape buffers is
also required. The subject location can be utilized with a smaller building to meet the parking
requirement, staff has determined that the proposed Variance is self-imposed; therefore, staff
recommends denial and the Site Development Plan Review applications. If these requests are
approved, it is subject to conditions.
1.
2.
3.

RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a 6,604 square-foot Building Maintenance
Service and Sales Building. The proposed building would create a site with insufficient parking
and resulted in a 50% deviation from standard parking requirements. A smaller building size
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
Variances.
1.

The proposed development of the subject site is not consistent with surrounding
development in the area. The applicant proposes 6,604 square-foot building for a proposed
Building Maintenance Service and Sales Building use. The proposed use would create a
site with insufficient parking and result in 50% deviation from standard parking
requirements.
2.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

The proposed landscape buffer is not consistent with Title 19 Landscape Standards, due to
the requested Waivers of the landscape buffer widths and Exceptions of the landscape
material and landscape island. The proposed development requires 22 parking spaces and
a Variance application to allow 11 parking spaces is required for the approval of the Site
Development Plan Review; staff recommends denial.
3.

Site access will be at Melody Lane, which is considered under capacity for traffic
conveyance. Circulation is logical and will not cause traffic conflicts on site or in the area.
4.
The building materials are appropriate for the area and the site will incorporate drought
tolerant landscape materials.
5.

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable for the
surrounding uses.
6.
general welfare.
Site Development is subject to permits, licensing and inspection, thereby safeguarding the
public health, safety and general welfare.
A Code Enforcement case (#160353) was processed. The case was resolved
10/15/15
on 01/20/16.
A Code Enforcement case (#166675) was processed trash debris at 3808
05/10/16
Melody Lane. The case was resolved on 05/25/16.
A Code Enforcement case (#170995) was processed for refuse and waste
09/28/16
dump at the northeast area of parcel with dead vegetation and weeds
throughout located at 3808 Melody Lane. The case is not resolved.
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]


09/16/15

A building permit (#306719) was issued for a demolition of single family
12/10/15
dwelling at 3808 Melody Lane. The permit was finalized on 08/18/16.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant and
representative about a proposed commercial building for the subject property.
The applicant was informed that the proposed project requires a Variance
08/11/16
application for parking since the proposed project requires 22 parking spaces
and a Site Development Plan Review application with waivers of the
landscape buffers and exceptions of the number trees required.
Field Check
09/26/16
A field check by staff was conducted of the subject property and observed
refuse and waste dump on the property.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.44
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Office, other than
Listed
General Retail
Multi-Family
Residential
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)

C-2 (General
Commercial)
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

Surrounding
Property
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)
M (Medium Density
Residential)

C-2 (General
Commercial)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (70 feet)
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Min. Lot Size
100 SF
96.97 SF
Min. Setbacks
Front (East)
10 Feet
11 Feet
Side (North)
10 Feet
10 Feet
Side (South)
10 Feet
57 Feet
20 Feet
20 Feet
Rear (West)
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
35 %
N/A Feet
23 Feet
Trash Enclosure
Roof or Trellis
Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
*Pursuant to Title 19.14, the subject property is a legal nonconforming.
Compliance
Y*
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]


Required
Standards
Provided
Compliance
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
5 Trees
3 Trees
N*
South
5 Trees
5 Trees
Y
East
2 Trees
2 Trees
Y
West
7 Trees
2 Trees
N*
19 Trees
12 Trees
N*
Parking Area Trees
1 Trees
0 Trees
N*
Min. Zone Width
North
8 Feet
0 Feet
N**
South
8 Feet
8 Feet
Y
East
15 Feet
10 Feet
N**
8 Feet
0 Feet
N**
West
Wall Height
8 Feet
Y
*An exception required for planting materials within the west, north and east landscape buffers.
**Waivers are required to allow zero feet along a portion of the west and north; and 10-foot
along the east perimeter landscape buffers has been requested as part of the Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-66658) application.
Street Name
Melody Lane
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Local Street
Governing Document
N/A
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
60
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
RG
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 [PRJ-66212]

Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Building
Maintenance
6604 SF
1/300 SF
22
Service and
Sales
22
11
N*
21
1
10
1
N*
Percent Deviation
50%
*Variance (VAR-66657) has been applied for with this Site Development Plan Review (SDR-66658)
application.
Waivers
Requirement
15-foot landscape buffer
adjacent to Right-of-Way
8-foot Interior Lot Lines
8-foot Interior Lot Lines
Exceptions
Requirement
One landscape island for every
six parking spaces.
24 box trees within perimeter
buffers (19 trees required)
Request
To allow a 10-foot
the east.
the north and west
perimeter.
the west.
Request
To allow zero landscape
island in the parking lot
To allow 12 perimeter
buffer trees
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
RG
VAR-66657
VAR-66657
A7
b7
A7
b7
A7
b7
A7
7
A7
7
7777
77
7A
A7
b7
7
7
7
777777
bA77 77
A7AA777AbA7A
Abb7777
bb7A7A 7b7
7b7A
7bb7AA77Abb7
A
/77
77A7A/7A
7bb7b
7/Ab7b7A7b77A
Ab7b777A7A7A
77/b777
7Ab7A
7777A777A
77/Ab7b7A7777
777/b7A777A
A7 77777A77A7
7A
77b7A777
7b7A777
A77b7b77bA77Ab7
777
77A77
7777A777 7
7/A77
7A7A
7b777bA7A7A77/A7Ab
A7
A7 77777A77A7
7/A77
7A7A77b
7
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
7/A77
7A7A77b
7/b77 7
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
7
7
7bb7b
7bA7b77b77Ab7b7A
77b777bA7A7A77/A
Ab
7
7
77/A77A7Ab
7A7b77 7
7A7A7A7b777/A
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
7 777777A
7 77777
7A A
7b A
7 7 7
A 7 b 7A A 7
7A 7
7 7
7b 7
777
777
777
A 7 A b 7 7
b A b 7 A b 7
A 7 A b 7
A A 7 A b 7
A 7
7 7 77
7 A 7 777 77 7
777 7
7 A
7 7 77
7 A 7 777 77 7
777 7
7 A
A 7A A
7 A b
7 A b 77
7 A b
7 A b
7 A b 7
7 A b 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
A 7 A 7A A 7
A 7 7A A 7
b
7
7
7
7A 7
7 7
7b 7
7A A
7 A A 7
7 A
A 7b b A 77b
7 A
7 7A
A 7 A 7 7
7A
7 7 7 b 77 7
77b77A7A
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
77A777bA
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
A 7 b
77A7 7b777Ab777bA
7bA7A7A77/A7Ab
7 A 7 A 7 7 7 A A 7 A
7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 A 7 A
7/Ab7bAb7
7A7
A77
bbA7b7A
VAR-66657 and SDR-66658 - REVISED
bA77 77
777 A
777777

77 7
7
A A Ab
A
7b
bA77 77
A7
b7
bA77 77
b A 7 A 77 7 A
A 7 b 7 A
A7
A7A77 7
777A777A
7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7
7 7
A 7
7777A
b77
77
A
77
7A77
bA
7b
bA7
7bA
AbAbA7A
7AbAbA
777777

777
777
7A
777777
bA77 77 7
7 A 7
A 7 b A 7
7b 7
b A 7 7
7 7
7 7
7 b A 7
7 7
7 7
A b A b A 7 A 7 7A b A b A 7
b 7 A 7
7 7 7 7 A 7

A b A 7 A
7A b A 7
A 7 7 7 A 7
7
7 A 7
7 A 7
A 7 A 7
7 A 7
A 7 A b A A 7 7 A 7
A 7 b A 7 A b 7 A 7
b 7 A

A b A 7 A 7
7b77
A777A7A7AA777b77
A77b7A
7AbA
AA7
A7
7A
A7,,bA
A7A
A7AbAA
7A
bA77 77 7
7
7
7
A b A 777 A
7b
77
77
A
A 7
A7A77 7
A7bA
777A777A
AbA
A
bA
7A77
7
7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7
7 7
A 7
7777A
b77
Ab,7A
7bb7
b7A77
7
b7A7
7A7
7bb7
b7A7
7A
b7A77
7A7
7bb7
b7A77
b7A7
7A7
7bb7
A7
A7
A7
bA77 77
7bb
7A7
b7A7
7A
7bb
7A
7A7A7b77bA7
A7%
A77%A77bA7A
A77A7777A
777A7
7
7
7
7
7
b777A77%777A
A7%%AbA7777A7A7
bA7
b
b777A77%Ab77bbA
A7
7A7
7A
bA77 77
A 777 A
bA77 77
777 A
bA77 77
777 A
A 777 A 7
7
A7
7bb
7A
b7A7
b7A7
7bb
7A
b7A7
7A
b7A7
7A
7A
7
7
7
7
7
b7A7
A7A77 7
7A7
777A777A
bA
7A77
7
7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7
7 7
A 7
7777A
b77
7bb7
b7A77
7
b7A7
7A7
7bb7
b7A7
7A
b7A77
7A7
7bb7
b7A77
b7A7
7A7
7bb7
A7
A7
A7
bA77 77
7bb
7A7
b7A7
7A
7bb
7A
7A7A7b77bA7
A7%
A77%A77bA7A
A77A7777A
777A7
7
7
7
7
7
b777A77%777A
A7%%AbA7777A7A7
bA7
b
b777A77%Ab77bbA
A7
7A7
7A
bA77 77
A 777 A
bA77 77
777 A
bA77 77
777 A
A 777 A 7
7
A7
7bb
7A
b7A7
b7A7
7bb
7A
b7A7
7A
b7A7
7A
7A
7
7
7
7
7
b7A7
A7A77 7
7A7
777A777A
bA
7A77
7
7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7
7 7
A 7
7777A
b77
7"
7"
7"7
7"
bA77 77 7
7A
77 A 7
7"
7
7"
7 A A 7
bA77 77
7 7 7
7A 7
7 7
7b 7
A 7 A 7A A 7
7A 7
7 7
7b 7
A 7 b 7A A 7
b
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
A 7 7A A 7
A 7 A b 7A A
7
7
7
7
7A 7
7 7
7b 7
7 7 7
7 7A A
7"
7b
"
A
7A A
A7A77 7
7
A
777A777A
bA
7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7
7 7
A 7
7777A
b77
7A77
7
A77A7777A
7bb7A7
777
b7A
7bb7A7
Ab77
b7bbA
A 7 A 7 7
7 A 7 7
77 77 A
7bA77A7Ab
7A7A7b
7AAb7bA
A777A77bA7
7
A7AbA
7A7A
7AAb7bA
A777A77bA7
777A7
b 77 A
A 77 b
7
A77A777bA7A
A77A7
7
777 A
7
VAR-66657 [PRJ-66212] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-66658 - APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

3808 MELODY LANE
09/26/16

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66658 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-66657 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: REGELIO CRUZ - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 6,604 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING
MAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES BUILDING, WITH WAIVERS OF THE
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS TO ALLOW 10 FEET ALONG THE EAST
PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ALONG
A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WHERE EIGHT FEET IS
REQUIRED on 0.50 acres at 3808 Melody Lane (APN 139-19-704-011), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66212]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-66658
SDR-66658

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66689 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD
YUDKA - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A THREE-FOOT SIDE
YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED HOME
ADDITION on 0.17 acres located at 4609 Del Monte Avenue (APN 162-06-213-011), R-1
(Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-66548]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD YUDKA
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66689
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
250
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
20
CS
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
CS
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a proposed home addition that will result in a
three-foot side yard setback where five feet is the minimum required in the R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district at 4609 Del Monte Avenue.
ISSUES
The R-1 zoning district requires principal buildings to have a minimum side yard setback of
five feet. The applicant is proposing a three-foot side yard setback for a proposed home
addition.
ANALYSIS
Per the submitted site plan, the addition will be used for a second kitchen and utility room.
According to Title 19, an auxiliary kitchen is permissible and defined as a second kitchen in a
single family detached dwelling that is:
1. Intended solely for use by members of the household for private dinner parties or social
gatherings; and
2. Not located within an accessory structure and is directly accessible from the rest of the
dwelling.
The proposed home addition will meet these requirements, as the owner has stated that the
second kitchen will be kosher and used for holidays and family gatherings. The submitted floor
plan also shows that the proposed second kitchen will be directly accessible from the rest of the
principal dwelling. The subject site is zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential), which requires a
five-foot side yard setback. The applicant is requesting a side yard setback of three feet for the
proposed home addition. The R-1 zoning district also allows a maximum lot coverage of 50
percent. With the proposed 311 square-foot addition, the total coverage will be 30 percent.
Since this is a self-imposed hardship created by the owner, staff recommends denial of the
request. If approved, the applicant will be able to construct its home addition with a three-foot
side yard setback.
CS
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to construct an addition that does not meet the
R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district standards. Reconfiguring the placement of the
proposed home addition would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the
A residential building permit (Permit #22008) was issued for a new single
10/18/63
family dwelling.
There are no relevant city actions associated with the subject site.
11/14/14
CS
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]
08/30/16
and deadlines were reviewed.
Field Check
09/26/16

Site Area
Net Acres
0.17
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)

R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CS
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548]
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width
60 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front
20 Feet
Side
5 Feet
Corner
15 Feet
Rear
15 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
35 Feet
Provided
7,405 SF
75 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
26 Feet
3 Feet
N/A
26 Feet
30 %
8 Feet
Y
N
N/A
Y
Y
Y
CS
VAR-66689
CLV Planning - Application Form

Application Number:
PRJ-66548
Application/Petition For:
VARIANCE FOR KITCHEN/PANTRY ADDITION
ProjectAddress (Location):
4609 DEL MONTE AVENUE
Project Name
VARIANCE FOR KITCHEN/PANTRY ADDITION
Assessors Parcel #(s):
16206213011
Ward #:
WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)
Is the Application Information

Correct:
Yes
If no, ...change what

General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Zoning District: Proposed:
Select
Gross Acres:
Lots/Units:
Additional Information:
Applicant First Name:
Stan
Applicant Last Name:
Popek
Applicant Address:
3655 W Quail Av Ste D
Applicant City:
Las Vegas
Applicant State:
Nevada
Applicant Zip:
89118
Applicant Phone:
7027885040
Applicant Fax:
Applicant Email:
design@gvsconstructionllc.com
Rep First Name:
Stan
Rep Last Name:
Popek
Rep Address:
3655 W Quail Av Ste D
Rep City:
Las Vegas
Rep State:
Nevada
Rep Zip:
89118
Rep Phone:
7027885040
Rep Fax:
Rep Email:
9/21/2016 1:27:37 PM
VAR-66689
Page 1 of 2
CLV Planning - Application Form

I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
Is the Owner Information Correct:
Yes
If no, ...change what
Owner(s)
ADDR1
ADDR2
WINOGRAD YUDKA
4609 DEL MONTE AVE
LAS VEGAS, NV 89102
CLVEPLAN Applicant
Company
Title
Email
Stan Popek
GVS Construction LLC
Engineer
9/21/2016 1:27:37 PM
VAR-66689
Page 2 of 2
b7A
b7A7
7A
VAR-66689
77A
b7A
A
A
A77AA7A
7b77
b 7b7b7b7bb77b
b

77

7
A
A
A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
7A
b7A
7A
VAR-66689
b7A
7 A
77A
b7A7
A
A

A77AA7A
7b77
b
7b7b7b7bb77b
b
77

A
A
A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
7A
VAR-66689
77
7
A7
77
A
A

A77AA
7A
7b77
b
7b7b7b7bb77b
b
77
A
A
A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
77
77
b7
7
77
7
7
7
77
VAR-66689
7
7
A
A
A77AA
7A
7b77
b
7b7b7b7bb77b
b
777

A
A
A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
A
77
77
b7
7
7
b7
7
7
b7
7
b7
VAR-66689
77
77
77
77
7
7AAb
7
A

A
77A
A7A
7b77
b
7b7b7b7bb77b
b
77

A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
7A
VAR-66689 - REVISED
77
A7
7b
Ab
b
A
A77AA7A
A

7b77
b
7b7b7b7bb77b
b
777
A
A
A7A777
77
A7A
77
77
A7A777
77A7A
777b777b
bAbA
VAR-66689
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD YUDKA

09/26/16
VAR-66689 [PRJ-66548] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD YUDKA

09/26/16
777 7b 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7/ 7/ 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777
7
77777
7777
77777
77777
7 /
7b 7 b
7 7 7A7 7
7 77
7
VAR-66689

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66733 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CYNTHIA MOTA
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT REAR AND
SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE THREE FEET IS REQUIRED FOR TWO EXISTING
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (CLASS II) [SHEDS] AND TO ALLOW ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES THAT ARE NOT AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE
PRINCIPAL DWELLING UNIT on 0.16 acres located at 1801 Cochran Street (APN 162-02313-013), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66589]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CYNTHIA MOTA
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66733
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
295
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
25
CS
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
The owner shall be required to paint the existing accessory structures in order to make them
aesthetically compatible to the principal dwelling unit.
3.
4.
5.
CS
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow two existing non-aesthetically compatible
accessory structures (Class II) [sheds] with a zero-foot rear and side yard setback where three
feet is the minimum required in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district at 1801
Cochran Street.
ISSUES
The R-1 zoning district requires accessory structures to have a minimum rear and side yard
setback of three feet. The applicant is proposing a zero-foot rear and side yard setback for
two existing sheds.
Title 19.06 requires accessory structures be aesthetically compatible with the principal
dwelling unit. The applicant is self-imposing a condition to paint the structures to match.
ANALYSIS
The subject sheds are located in the southwest corner of the subject property. Title 19.06 requires
that accessory structures be aesthetically compatible with the principal dwelling unit. The
existing untreated wood sheds are not compatible with the tan-colored single family dwelling at
the subject site. Per the submitted justification letter, the applicant has proposed to paint the
accessory structures in order to meet this requirement. If approved, a condition of approval has
been added to address this issue. No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the
requested Variance. The existing accessory structures can be redesigned or relocated to meet
current code requirements. As such, the hardship is self-imposed and staff recommends denial.
1.
2.
3.


CS
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]

resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by constructing structures that do not meet the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district standards. Removal or modification of the structures would
allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
Variances.
A Code Enforcement citation (#161841) was issued for two sheds that dont
meet the required setbacks and for trees in the front yard with thorns that
12/22/15
overhang on the sidewalk at 1801 Cochran Street. The citation remains
unresolved.

05/29/03

c. 1955
The existing single-family dwelling was constructed.
08/31/16
and deadlines were discussed.
CS
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff conducted a routine field check and found the site to have no trash or
debris.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.16
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)

R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CS
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589]
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width
60 Feet
Min. Setbacks (Accessory Structures)
Front
20 Feet
Side
3 Feet
3 Feet
Rear
Min. Distance From Principal Dwelling
6 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
Max. Lot Coverage of Rear Yard
50%
35 Feet
50% of principal
Max. Size of Accessory Structures
du.
Provided
6,969 SF
60 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
94 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
23 Feet
22%
7%
9 Feet
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
15%
CS
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
VAR-66733
7 7
7
7
777
77b
7
7
77 7 7
7 7
7 7 7
A7
7
7
7
7
A7A
7
7
7
7
A
A
77

7
7
7777
7777
77
7 7
7
7
7
7
7 7
7
7
7
77
7 7
7777
77
A7A
7
7

b7A
77A
A7
7
VAR-66733

77 7 7
7
7

A7
7b77
Ab7A7
bAA7A
7
7
7 77
b7
7 7
7
A7
7

77

7
7
7

7

7
7 7
Ab7AA7A
7 7
7Ab77
7
7
7
Ab7
7 7
7
7
7 7
77bA77A7b77 7A
Ab7A
b7 7A7Ab7
7A
7 Ab7
A7Ab7b
7A
7AbA
77A7b
A7A
Ab77
Ab7b
Ab77A7
77A7b7
b77
b77A
b7
b77A
7 7
b7
7 77
A7Ab7777bA7b7
7777A
Ab
7777777777
7777777777
7 77777
AA7
7 7
7 7
7
7

A7

7
7

7
7
77
7

7
7
7
777 7777777 7
77 7777777
7777777A7
bAA7
bb

777777777777
7
7

b7
bbA7
7

7

7
7
7
7
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: CYNTHIA MOTA

1801 COCHRAN STREET
09/26/16
VAR-66733 [PRJ-66589] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: CYNTHIA MOTA

1801 COCHRAN STREET
09/26/16
b7
7777
7b7
777
77
b777777
777
777
A77b7
77777777 777b77
7777777A77b7777:
7777777777777777
777777777777777
777777777777777
77777A777777777777
77777777777777777
7777A77777777777
777777777777
7777777777
b777777:77777
77777777777777
77777777777777
77777:777777777777
777777:7777:777777:
77777777777777
77777777777:
777777777:7777
77777A777777:
77777777777777
777777777777
777777777
:77777777777:7
7777777777777777:
77777777777
b7
7
VAR-66733

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-66818 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TRISHA K.
NILSSON-LIGHT AND SHAWN M. LIGHT - For possible action on a request for a Variance
TO ALLOW FIVE-FOOT SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS WHERE 10 FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 590 SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS
II) [SHED] on 0.46 acres at 6205 Newkirk Court (APN 125-26-110-012), R-E (Residence
Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64916]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Letters
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TRISHA K. NILSSON-LIGHT AND
SHAWN M. LIGHT
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-66818
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
90
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
23
RG
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
RG
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a proposed 590 square-foot Accessory Structure
(Class II) [Shed] to be within five feet of the rear and side property lines where 10 feet is
required on a property located at 6205 Newkirk Court.
ISSUES
The request for Variance is to allow the proposed shed five feet from the side and rear
property line where 10 feet is required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
Relocating the structure to 10 feet from side and rear property line is achievable and no
evidence of unique circumstances has been presented. Staff recommends denial.
ANALYSIS
The property is located in an R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district and is subject to the
requirements of Title 19.06 standards. The subject property contains a single family residence
and is located within the Rural Preservation Overlay District. The proposed accessory structure
will not have an impact on the Rural Preservation Overlay District.
The proposed accessory structure will be located at the northwest corner of the subject property
with a side and rear yard setback of five feet from the west and north property lines. The
distance between the principal structure and the accessory structure is greater than six feet as
required by code. The proposed structure will serve as an extra storage space for the subject
property. The proposed accessory structures exterior will be stucco and the color will match the
primary dwelling.
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the proposed Accessory Structure (Class II)
[Shed] to be five feet from the side and rear property line. Pursuant to Title 19.06; in an R-E
Zoning District, the accessory structure placement must be at 10 feet from the property line. The
subject property is not an irregularly shaped lot and has sufficient space to accommodate an
accessory structure that can meet Title 19 requirements. Unique or extraordinary circumstances
has not been presented with this Variance request, therefore, staff recommends denial of this
request. If this application is approved, it is subject to conditions.
RG
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing an accessory structure within the required side
and rear yard setbacks. The subject property is not an irregular shaped lot and has sufficient
space to accommodate an accessory structure that can meet Title 19 requirements. In view of the
The City Council approved the request for a Special Use Permit (U-0081-97)
09/25/97
for Private Streets within a 33-lot subdivision. The Planning Commission and

02/27/15
RG
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]

A building permit (#01021645) was issued for a Single Family Dwelling at
12/17/01
6205 Newkirk Court. The permit was finalized 05/20/02.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to discuss the
placement option of the proposed Accessory Structure (Class II) [Shed] to
avoid an application for a Variance for setbacks. Applicant wishes to
06/01/16
construct the structure on an existing foundation where it is five feet from rear
and side property lines. The Variance application submittal requirements
were discussed.
A neighborhood Meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
09/26/16
A field check by staff observed the subject property to be well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.46
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Undeveloped
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural
R (Rural Density
Residential)
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural

R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted)
RG
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916]
Master Plan Areas

Rural Preservation Overlay District
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
20,000 SF
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Accessory Structure Min. Setbacks
Side
10 Feet
10 Feet
Rear
6 Feet
Max. Rear and Side Coverage
50%
35 Feet or 2 stories
*Variance (VAR-66818) has been applied.
Street Name
Newkirk Court
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Local
Governing Document
N/A
Provided
20,038 SF
100 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
5 Feet
5 Feet
56 Feet
4.8 %
15 Feet
N*
N*
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
40
Compliance
with Street
Section
N/A
RG
VAR-66818
VAR-66818
bA7777
7A
AbA7A
Abb
77
7A
7b
7A
7A
A7A
7A7A
77A
7b
bb7b
A77A7b 7
7AA77b
7AA7A7b
7 77b
7 7bAbA7b
7AA7bbA7b
777bA7b
7AA7b7A
bbAb777 777777
VAR-66818 - REVISED
7A7
7 77
b7Ab
A7A7AA7777777777
A
7AA777777777777777777777777
b
7 7A77b77777
77A7AA7777777
A

77A7AA777777
A
77
A
bA
77A777777777777
7 777Ab
Ab
77bA777777
A
7 77bA7777
A
7AA7777777777777

7 77b7777777
A7A7777777777
77bA777777777
AA777777777777777777777777
7 777777777
7 777777777
7AA77777777777777777
77777777777777777777777
A777 77777
bAb
7A7
b
7
77b
A7A777
77A
b77b7#7A7A7777777777
VAR-66818
VAR-66818 [PRJ-64916] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: TRISHA K. NILSSON-LIGHT AND SHAWN

M. LIGHT
6205 NEWKIRK COURT
09/27/16

M. LIGHT
6205 NEWKIRK COURT
09/27/16

M. LIGHT
6205 NEWKIRK COURT
09/27/16
VAR-66818
VAR-66818
VAR-66818
VAR-66818

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-66692 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOUCHSTONE
LONE MOUNTAIN, LLC - For possible action on a request TO ALLOW NO EXTERNAL
STREETLIGHTS FOR A PROPOSED FOUR-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.50
acres at the southeast corner of Hickam Avenue and Juliano Road (APN 138-05-801-006), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation], Ward 4
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. City Council Action Letter for VAR-48779
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TOUCHSTONE LONE MOUNTAIN,
LLC
CASE
NUMBER
WVR-65941
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
76
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
16
FS
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
WVR-65941 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
Public Works
5.
The installation of streetlights on Juliano Street and Hickam Avenue shall be deferred
provided that exterior street lighting shall be stubbed out for later use, including all
necessary underground improvements including conduit and pull boxes at each future
streetlight location, and the developer shall provide to the City such streetlights for future
installation. Alternatively, monies in lieu of such deferred streetlights, including
foundations, may be contributed to the City if allowed by the Department of Public Works.
The contributed amount shall be based on the City's current bond schedules for all
streetlights and associated infrastructure deferred by this action adjacent to this site.
FS
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Waiver from Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lights on public
streets for a proposed residential subdivision at the southeast corner of Juliano Road and Hickam
Avenue.
ISSUES
A Waiver is being requested to allow no streetlights along Hickam Avenue and Juliano
Road. Staff recommends denial of the request.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-47840) to allow no streetlights in 2013;
however, this entitlement is expired.
ANALYSIS
The request is for a Waiver of Title 19.02 to allow no streetlights along Hickam Avenue and
Juliano Road. The stated justification for this request is that the area is rural in nature, and that
the area residents do not wish to have streetlights installed. Both Hickam Avenue and Juliano
Road are 60-foot collector streets. The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-47840) to allow
no streetlights in 2013; however, this entitlement has since expired. In 2013, a four-lot Parcel
Map (PMP-48778) was conditionally approved for the subject site, but it has not been recorded
as of October 2016.
When a site is developed in the City of Las Vegas, it is customary to require the installation of all
incomplete or damaged improvements surrounding the site so they match what exists in the
surrounding area. Although streetlights are not customary in this area, the City is currently
working on building complete streets throughout the City to provide for pedestrian safety and
comfort. No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waivers of Title
19.02.240 and Staff recommends denial of the request.
FINDINGS (WVR-66692)
No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waivers of Title 19.02.240
and to allow no external streetlights where such are required. Staff recommends denial of the
request.
FS
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]
The City Council approved a petition to Annex [A-0048-01(A)] 2.5 acres of
01/16/02
property generally located at the intersection of Juliano Road and Hickam
Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission denied a request for a Rezoning (ZON-10495)
from: U (Undeveloped) [DR (Desert Rural Residential) General Plan
01/12/06
Designation] to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2 Units Per
Acre). Staff Recommended denial. The applicant withdrew the request prior
to being heard by City Council.
The Planning Commission denied a request for a Variance (VAR-10496) to
allow a proposed residential planned development where the minimum
01/12/06
allowed is five acres Staff Recommended denial. The applicant withdrew the
request prior to being heard by City Council.
The Planning Commission denied a request for a Waiver (WVR-10947) of
Title 18.12 to allow 175 feet between centerline intersections where 220 feet
01/12/06
is the minimum allowed. Staff Recommended denial. The applicant withdrew
the request prior to being heard by City Council.
The Planning Commission denied a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-10494) for a five-lot residential subdivision.
Staff
01/12/06
Recommended denial. The applicant withdrew the request prior to being
heard by City Council.
A request for a Variance (VAR-47840) to allow a private street to not comply
with minimum standards for a public street, including no sidewalks or
03/12/13
streetlights where such are required and a width of 40 feet where a minimum
of 47 feet is required was withdrawn without prejudice at 3/12/13 Planning
Commission.
The applicant submitted a four-lot Parcel Map (PMP-48778) for technical
03/26/13
review. The map has been conditionally approved, but has not been recorded.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-47840) to allow no streetlights
06/19/13
where such are required. Staff had recommended denial and the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
06/25/14
A change of ownership occurred.
A pre-application meeting was held and general submittal requirements were
9/15/16
discussed.
FS
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]
A neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request, nor was one held.
Field Check
08/31/16

Site Area
Gross Acres
2.50
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Undeveloped
DR (Desert Rural
Residential)
U (Undeveloped) [DR
(Desert Rural Residential)
General Plan Designation]
Single Family,
Detached
Unincorporated Clark
County RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
County R-E (Rural
Estates)
Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
U (Undeveloped) [RNP
(Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) General
Plan Designation]
East
Undeveloped
West
Undeveloped
County RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
County RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
Master Plan Areas

County R-E (Rural
Estates)
County R-E (Rural
Estates)
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
FS
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677]

Trails
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Hickam Avenue
60 Minor
Collector Street
Juliano Road
60 Minor
Collector Street
Waivers
Requirement
19.02.240 - Street lighting for
public streets shall be designed
and installed in accordance with
City standards
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Title 19.04 Complete

Streets
30 feet
Y or N
Title 19.04 Complete

Streets
30 feet
Request
Provide no streetlights
along the public streets
Denial
FS
WVR-66692
WVR-66692
WVR-66692
WVR-66692 [PRJ-66677] - WAIVER - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOUCHSTONE LONE MOUNTAIN, LLC

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HICKAM AVENUE AND JULIANO ROAD
09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16
A7
7777
A7A77
7
A7
A77
b77777
777
7777
77
+777
77
77777777777
A7777777
7777b
77777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7
77777777777A
77777777A77777;
77777777777777;
7777777777777
777;77
7 7 77 7 7 77 7 77 77 7
7777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777
7 ;7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ;7 7 7 +
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777777777;7777777
7777777777777
77777777777777
77
7
7b
7
WVR-66692
WVR-66692
WVR-66692
WVR-66692

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-67096 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF
NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: ROARING FORK MANAGEMENT, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS ALONG ALPINE RIDGE WAY
AND ON THE INTERIOR OF A PROPOSED 22-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION on 4.79 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge
Way (APN 126-24-401-016), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-67084]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 12/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC OWNER:
ROARING FORK MANAGEMENT, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
WVR-67096

conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
72
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
18
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
WVR-67096 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
Public Works
5.
The installation of streetlights on Alpine Ridge Way and the interior subdivision streets
shall be deferred provided that exterior street lighting shall be stubbed out for later use,
including all necessary underground improvements including conduit and pull boxes at
each future streetlight location, and the developer shall provide to the City such streetlights
for future installation. Alternatively, monies in lieu of such deferred streetlights, including
foundations, may be contributed to the City if allowed by the Department of Public Works.
The contributed amount shall be based on the City's current bond schedules for all
streetlights and associated infrastructure deferred by this action adjacent to this site.
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to waive the Title 19.02 requirement for streetlights on Alpine Ridge
Way and on the interior public streets of a proposed single-family residential development
located at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way.
ISSUES
Title 19.02.240 requires street lighting for public streets to be designed, installed or upgraded
in accordance with City standards unless the City Council allows an exception. The
applicant is requesting that this requirement be waived for Alpine Ridge Way and the interior
public streets of the proposed development. If approved, the Department of Public Works
will require that streetlights be stubbed out for future use.
ANALYSIS
According to the applicant, the Waiver request is in response to neighbors in the surrounding
area who wish to retain a rural character. The required streetlights along Alpine Ridge Way and
the public streets on the interior of the proposed development are included in the request.
Streetlights are planned to be installed on Centennial Parkway, which is classified as a Primary
Arterial by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Streetlights are required to be installed
along all streets for the safety of City residents. No substantial evidence has been presented to
warrant the requested waiver of Title 19.02.240. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the
request. If denied, streetlights must be provided on all adjacent public streets and the interior
public streets. If approved, the Department of Public Works will require by condition that
streetlights be stubbed out for future use.
FINDINGS (WVR-67096)
Streetlights play a vital public safety role for public streets. The Department of Public Works
finds that streetlights are therefore necessary along Alpine Ridge Way and on the interior of this
development, and that no substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested
waiver. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the waiver request.
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]
The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-12215) of 207.83 acres
generally located north of Centennial Parkway between Shaumber Road and
02/07/07
Fort Apache Road and containing Centennial High School. The annexation
became effective 02/16/07.
The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-58988) of 10.00 acres at
07/01/15
the southwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way. The
annexation became effective 07/10/15.
The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-64386) of 4.78 acres at the
07/20/16
northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way. The
annexation became effective 07/28/16.
The City Council will consider a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-66455) from R (Rural Density Residential) to L (Low Density
Residential) on 4.78 acres on the north side of Centennial Parkway at Alpine
Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council will consider a request for a Rezoning (ZON-66456) from U
(Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation] to
R-SL (Residential Small Lot) on 4.78 acres on the north side of Centennial
Parkway at Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council will consider a request for a Variance (VAR-66457) to
allow a Connectivity Ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required for a proposed
11/16/16
subdivision on 4.78 acres on the north side of Centennial Parkway at Alpine
Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council will consider a request for a Waiver (WVR-66636) to allow
a 182-foot intersection offset distance where 220 feet is required for a
proposed subdivision on 4.78 acres on the north side of Centennial Parkway
at Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council will consider a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-66459)
for a proposed 22-lot single family residential subdivision on 4.78 acres on
the north side of Centennial Parkway at Alpine Ridge Way. The Planning

07/08/08
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]

There are no relevant building permits or licenses related to this site.
In lieu of a pre-application meeting, a list of submittal requirements was e10/04/16
mailed to the applicant.
A neighborhood meeting was held at the Centennial Hills YMCA/Community
Center at 6601 North Buffalo Drive in Las Vegas. There were nine members
of the public, three members of the development team, one City Council
Ward staff member and one Department of Planning staff member in
attendance.
09/21/16
The applicants representative described the proposed project, which would

consist of two-story homes on public streets north of Centennial Parkway.
Floor plans would be up to 3,600 square feet and have patios and balconies.
Those in attendance were very concerned about proposed increases in density
south and east of Clark County 215 in general and were not in support of this
project at 4.8 dwelling units per acre. They would support development at the
allowed density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Neighbors were also strongly
opposed to internal streetlights and streetlights along Alpine Ridge Way. The
applicants representative stated he would bring these concerns to the owner,
which may result in a reduction of lots being brought forward.
Other concerns included the following:
City should consider developing rural residential development
standards
Concern that a quality home product could not be provided on smaller
lots
Field Check
09/01/16
The site is undeveloped and contains natural vegetation. An unpaved access

road borders the site to the east. An existing Wireless Communication
Facility complex is located directly to the west of the site.
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]

Site Area
Gross Acres
4.79
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
North
CC215 Freeway
South
Single Family,
Detached
East
Undeveloped
West
Wireless
Communication
Facility, Stealth
Design
Planned or Special
R (Rural Density
Residential)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open
Space)
RL (Residential Low)
Clark County
Designation

U (Undeveloped)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted)
C-V (Civic)
R-U (Rural Open Land)
Clark County Designation
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SS
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084]
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Centennial Pkwy
Primary Arterial

and Highways Map
Minor Street
Title 13.12
Alpine Ridge Way
Waivers
Requirement
Streetlights along public streets
are required to be installed per
City standards
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
N/A
(proposed
103)
N/A
(proposed
30)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
N/A
Request
To allow no streetlights along Alpine
Ridge Way and the interior of the
Denial
proposed subdivision
SS
WVR-67096
WVR-67096
7 A
7 7
7
7
7 7
7 7
7
7
7 7
7 7
b 7
7 7
7 7
7 7A
7 7
7
A 7A
7 A b
b 7A
7
7b
b A 7
7
7 A
7
7
7

7 7
7 7
7
7
7 7
7 7
7
7
7
7 7
A 77 7
7 A A 7b
A 7 b
7
b 7
b 7

7A 7 A
77
7
A 7 7 A
77
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
A 7
7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7

A 7 7A 7
7A 7 A 7
A 7
A 7A 7 b 7 A 7 7 7 A
b b 7 b 7b

7A 7 A
WVR-67096
7
b 7
A 7
7 A 7
7 A 7 7 b 7
7A 7 A 7
7 7
b A
7b b
A 7 A b 7 7
7 7
A 7 7 7
7A 7 7
7A b A 7
7 A
A
b A
7 A b 7 7 7 A A
A 7A 7 7 A
7 A b
7
7
7
7
7
7 A b
7 A b
7A b
7A b
7 A 7 A 7 7 b
7 7
A 7 7A 7
7 A 7 A
A 77
777
7 A 7b
A 7 A 7 A
A 7 b
7 A 7 A 7 b 7 b
7
b 7 7A 7 A
b A 7 7
b 7b A
7
7
7
b
A 7
A 7
A A 7
7b 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7
7A 7
7 A 7 A 7 777 7 7 A 7 A 7 77 7 7 A
A 7 77 7 7 7 A 7 77 7 b 77 7
7 A 77 A 7 7 7 7
A 7 b
7A 7 A 7 7b 7 7b 7A 7 7 A 7A 7b A 7 A A
A 7
b A
77 7 7 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A
77 7 7 7 A 7 77 7 b 77 77
A 777 A 7 7b 7 7A 7 A 7b A 7b 7 A A 7A 7 7 7
7 A 77 7 A 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b A 7 b
A 7 7 A
7 7 b A 7 7 7A 7A A 7 77 7 A 7 7
b A b 7 7 7 7 7 A b 7 b A 7A 7 A
b A 7 7A 7 7 7 7 7b b
b b 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 A 7A 7 7 7A 7
77 7 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 b A
7 b A
A 7 7 A A 7b
7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7
7b 7A
7 A 7A
7b A 7
7 7 A
A b 7 A 7A 7
b 7 A
A 7A b A 7 A A b 7A 7 7 7b A 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 A A b 7 7 A 7 7 A b A 7 7 b
b A 7 A A b 7 7 b 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 b 7
A A 7 7b 77A 7A b A 7 A 7 7 7b A b 7 7 7
7 b 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7A b A 7A A 7 A A
7 b 7 A 7 b 7 7 A 7 b 7 A 7 A 7
b 7 b 7A 7 A 7 A 7 7A 7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7A
A A
7 A 7 7 7A 7 7 A A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
b 7 7A 7 A 7 A A 7 77 7 7 7 A 7A 7 A 7 7
7b 7 7b A 7A 7A A b 7 7 A 77 7 7
7A 7 A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 7
A 77 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 77A 7 7 7 7
A b A 7 A 7 b 7 A 7A 7 A 7 b 7 A
A A 7b 7 7 7 A A 7 A 7 A 7b A
A 7 A 7
A b A 7
7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7 A A 7 b 7b A
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7b 7 7A 7 A A 7 b
7 7 7b A 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7A 7 b b A 7A A 7
7 7 7 7 A 7A 7 A 7 7
7 7 7 A 7 7 7 A 7 7 b A 7 77 7
7 7 7 A b 7A 7 b b A 7A A 7 7 7 7 7
A 7A 7 A 7 7
7
7
7 7
7 A A 777777777777 7
7 77777777777777 7
b 7 777777777777777 7
A 7777777777777777777777777777777 7

7
7
7
7
7
7
A 777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
7A 7 7 7A 7 7 7 7
A 7
7 A b
b A
b
b 777 77 b
7
Ab 7
A A b 7b b
7A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 b
A7 A
A 7 A
b 77 A
b 7
A b 7 7b
7
A
7
7 A 7 7 A
b 77 A
7 A 7 7A 7 A A
7 7 7 b A
7
b A
7

b
b A 7 b A 7
7
7
bb7
b A 7b
b 7 7 7b b
A
7
7
b b 7 b A 7b 7 7 A
b 7A 7
b b 7b A 7b 7 A 7 b A A 7 b 7 b
b 7 7b 7
b 7
b
b
7
A
b 7 b 7 7A 7 A
b 7 b 7b b 7 7
b 7 b A 7 A 7
7
b 7 b 7 7 7A 7 A
b 7 b 7b b 7
b 7 b 7 7
7 A
7 A 7 A 7
7 b 7 7
7
7 A
A
7

7 7
7
7 A
7
b 7 b b A
A 7 7 A A 7 A 7A 7 7
7
7 7 A
7
A A 7
7 7 A
7

7

7 A
7
7 7 A
7 A 7
7
7 A
7
7 7 A
7
7 A
7 b A
7 7 7 A
7 7 A A 7 A
A 7
7
A
b 7 7b A 7
7
A b A
7
A 7

A A
7 A
b A 7b
b 7 7
7 A 7 7 b A
A 7 7
A 7 7
A 7 7A 7
7 7 7A 7
A A 7 7 7
A 7 7 7
A 7 7 7
7A 7
7 A 7 7 7A b A 7
b A b A
A 7 7777 77 A 77 77777777 777777777
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 A 77777777
A 7 777 7777
A 77 7 A 7 777 7 77777
A A 7 777 77
A 7 7 7 77
A 77 7 A 777 77
A b 7 77 7 A 7 A
A 7 7A 7 7 777
7 7 7 7
7A b A 7
b A 777
A A 7b A b A 7
b 7 A 7
A
7A 7
7
A

7A 7 7 A
7 7
7
A 7
7 A
b
A
A
A A 7
77 777777
A 7
A 7
A 7A 7b 7 7A 7 A 7 A

A 7 7 b 7
7A 7 A
A 7b A
AA
AA
A A
b 7b 7 A
7 A A
7
b 7
7
7 7 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7
777A 77 7
7 A
b b 7
b A
7

7
b
7 A 7
7

77
7
b 7

A b b
A

7
b 7
7b 7 A 7 A A
A 7 A
7 7 A 7
b A 7 7A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7
7

7
A

77 7
A

b
A A
A
7 '
7 '
7 '
7 ' 7
7 ' 7
7 ' 7
7
7 7
7 7
7 '
7
7 ' 7
7 '
7 '
7 ' 7
7 '
7 ' 7
7 7
7
77
77 7 b
A 77 7
7 A A 7b
A 7 b
7
b 7
b 7

7A 7 A
77
77 7 b
7 b 7 7A
77 7 b
7 '
77b A 77 7 7 b 7 77 7 b
7 ' 7
7 ' 7
7 '
7 '
7
7 7
7A
7 7
7 A b
b 7A
7 '
7b

b b A 7
A 7
7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7

A 7 7A 7
7A 7 A 7
7 7
7 A
7
7
7
7
A

7
7
7
7
7 7
b A
7b b
77 7 7 b
77 b 7 7 b
A 7
A 7A 7 b 7 A 7 7 7 A
b b 7 b 7b

7A 7 A
A 7 A b 7 7
7 7
A 7 7 7
7A 7 7
7A b A 7
7 A
' A
b A

b
A
7 A b 7 7 7 A A
A 7A 7 7 A
7 A b
7'
7 '
7 '
7 '
7 '
7 A b
7 A b
7A b
7A b
7 A 7 A 7 7 b
7 7
A 7 7A 7
7' A 7 A
A 77
777

7
7
7
7
7
A A 7
7b ' ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7
7A 7
7 A 7 A ' 7 777 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 77 ' 7 7 A

A 7 77 ' 7 7 7 A 7 77 ' 7 b 77 7
7 A 77 A 7 7 7
7A 7 A 7 7b 7 7b 7A 7 7 A 7A 7b A 7 A A
A 7
A 7 b
b A
77 7 7 7 A 7 " 7 7 7 " 7 7 A 7 A
77 ' 7 7 7 A 7 77 ' 7 b 77 77
A 777 A 7 7b 7 ' 7A 7 A 7b A 7b 7 A A 7A 7 7 7
7 A 77 ' 7 A 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 ' ' b A 7 b
A 7 '7 A
7 7 b A 7 7 7A 7A A 7 77 7 A 7 7
b A b 7 7 7 7 7 A b 7 b A 7A 7 A
b A 7 ' 7A 7 7 7 7 7b b
b b 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 A 7A 7 7 7A 7
77 7 7A 7 7 7' 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 b A
7 b A
A 7' 7 A A 7b
7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7
7b 7A
7 A 7A
7b A 7
7 7 A
A b 7 A 7A 7
b 7 A
A 7A b A 7 A A b 7A 7 7 7b A 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 A A b 7 7 A 7 7 A b A 7 7 b
b A 7 A A b 7 7 b 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 b 7
A A 7 7b 77A 7A b A 7 A 7 7 7b A b 7 7 7
7b 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7A b A 7A A 7 A A
7 b 7 A 7 b 7 7 A 7 b 7 A 7 A 7
b 7 b 7A 7 A 7 A 7 7A 7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7A
A A
7A 7 7 7A 7 7 A A 7 7A 7 7 7 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
b 7 7A 7 A 7 A A 7 77 7 7 7 A 7A 7 A 7 7
7b 7 7b A 7A 7A A b 7 7 A 77 7 7
7A 7 A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 7
A 77 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 77A 7 7 7 7
A b A 7 A 7 b 7 A 7A 7 A 7 b 7 A
A A 7b 7 7 7 A A 7 A 7 A 7b A
A 7 A 7
A b A 7
7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7 A A 7 b 7b A
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7b 7 7A 7 A A 7 b
7 7 7b A 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7A 7 b b A 7A A 7
7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 7 A 7 7 7 A 7 7 b A 7 77 7
7 7 7 A b 7A 7 b b A 7A A 7 7 7 7 7
A 7A 7 A 7 7
7
7
7 7
7 A A 777777777777 7
7 77777777777777 7
b 7 777777777777777 7
A 7777777777777777777777777777777 7
7 A b
b A
7
A 777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
7A 7 7 7A 7 7 7 7
A 7
7 A 7b
A 7 A 7 A
A 7 b
7 A 7 A 7 b 7 b
7
b 7 7A 7 A
b A 7 7
b 7b A
7
7
7
b
A 7
A 7
b
b 777 77 b
7
Ab 7
A A b 7b b
7A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 b
A7 A
A 7 A
b 77 A
b7
A b 7 ' 7b
7
A
7
' 7 A 7' 7 A
b 77 A
7 7 7 b A
7 A 7 ' 7A 7 A A
7
b A
7

b
b A 7 b A 7
7
7
bb7
b A 7b
b 7 7 ' 7b b
' A
b b ' 7 b A 7b 7' 7 A
7
7
b 7A 7
b b 7b A 7b 7 A 7 b A A 7 b 7 b
b 7 7b 7
b 7
b
' b
7
A
b 7 b 7 ' 7A 7 A
b 7 ' b 7b b 7 7
b 7 b A 7 A 7
7
b 7 ' b 7b b 7
b 7 b 7 ' 7 7A 7 A
7 ' A
b 7 b 7 ' 7
7 A 7 A 7
7 b 7 7
7
7 A
A
7

7 7
7
7 A
7
b 7 b b A
A 7 7 A A 7 A 7A 7 7
7
7 ' 7 A
7
A A 7
7 '7 A
7

7

7 A
''7
' 7' 7 A
7 A 7
' 7
' 7 A
7
7 7 A
' 7
' 7 A
7 b A
7 7 7 A
7 ' 7 A A 7 A
A 7
7
A
b 7 ' 7b A 7
7
A b A
7
A

A A
7 A
b A 7b
b 7 7
7 A 7 7 b A 7
A 7 7
A 7 7
A 7 7A 7
7 7 7A 7
A A 7 7 7
A 7 7 7
A 7 7 7
7A 7
7 A 7 7 7A b A 7
b A b A
A 7 7777 77 A 77 77777777 777777777
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 A 77777777
A 7 777 7777
A 77 7 A 7 777 7 77777
A A 7 777 77
A 7 777 77
A 77 7 A 777 77
A b 7 77 7 A 7 A
A 7 7A 7 7 777
7 7 ' 7 7
7A b A 7
b A 777
A A 7b A b A
b 7 ' A 7
WVR-67096
7
b 7
A 7
7' A 7
7' A 7 7 b 7
7A 7 A
77 7 b 7 77 7 b
A 7
A 7A 7b 7 7A 7 A 7 A

A 7 7 b 7
7A 7 A
7 7 b
A 7 7 A
77 7 b
7 7 b 7
7 7 b 7
7
7
7
7
77

7
b 7
A '
7A 7
7
77
' ' A
' ' A
7A 7 7 A
A 7b A
A A
AA
A A
A A 7
77 777777
A 7
' 7 7
7
b 7
7
A

7 7
7
A 7
7 A
b
A b b
A

b 7b 7 A
7 A A
7
b 7
7
7 7 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7
777A 77 7
b b 7
7 A
7 7
b A
7

7
b
A 7 A 7
7
' 7 A
7b 7 A 7 A A
A 7 A
7 7 A 7
b A 7 7A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7
7
7 '
A

b
A ' A
WVR-67096 [PRJ-67084] - WAIVER - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:

ORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND ALPINE RIDGE WAY
09/01/16

09/01/16

09/01/16
WVR-67096

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 11, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66544 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN
STREET INVESTMENTS III, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED DRIVE-THROUGH at 1311 South Main Street (APN 162-03-110-131), CM (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66201].
Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN STREET INVESTMENTS III, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66544
SDR-66545
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-66544
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
148
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
A Required Review (public hearing) shall be required for this Special Use Permit one (1)
year following issuance of a business license.
5.
Planning
1.
2.
All development shall be in conformance with the building elevations, site plan and
landscape plan date stamped 10/11/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
3.
A Waiver from Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan parking lot screening standards is
hereby approved, to allow no parking lot screening fence.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

Conditions Page Two
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
7.
Public Works
8.
Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk and the
proposed driveway on Main Street in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
9.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way on Main Street adjacent to this site.
10.

Main Street public right-of-way prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements.
The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the Encroachment Agreement
and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If
requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public rightof-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's Encroachment
Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public
right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the
property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
11.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the Main-Commerce one-way couplet-Las Vegas Boulevard to Bonneville
Avenue project and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply
with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

12.
Fire Services.
13.
A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any
construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section
addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-ofway requirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement of on site development
activities unless specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by
the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
14.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit and Site Development Plan Review for a proposed
2,148 square-foot Restaurant with a Drive-Through at 1311 South Main Street.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for the proposed Drive-Through as the use does not meet
screening requirements listed in Conditional use Regulation #2 listed in Title 19.12.
A Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan parking lot screening standards is hereby
requested, to allow no parking lot screening fence. Staff recommends approval of the request.
ANALYSIS
This project is located in the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan Downtown South District
and proposes to construct a Drive-Through use, which will operate in conjunction with a
Restaurant (coffee shop) totaling 2,148 square feet on the interior with a 170 square-foot outdoor
patio adjacent to Main Street and a 1,560 square-foot outdoor patio in the rear of the building.
The subject site has a zoning designation of C-M (Commercial/Industrial), which allows the
proposed Restaurant as a permitted use and the Drive-Through as a conditional land use.
Drive Through Conditional Use Regulations:
1. A single-station drive-through shall have a stacking lane that will accommodate a minimum of
six vehicles, including the vehicle at the station. A multiple-station drive-through shall have
stacking lanes that will accommodate a minimum of three vehicles per station, including the
vehicle at that station.
The submitted site plan indicates that the proposed single-station drive-through will provide a
stacking lane which will accommodate six vehicles.
2. The drive-through shall be screened in accordance with LVMC 19.08.040(F).
The submitted landscaping plan indicates that the proposed development will not provide
landscape buffer screening that complies with Title 19.08.040(F) requirements, which require a
landscape buffer with 24-inch box trees spaced every 20 feet with four shrubs along the north
and east perimeter of the proposed drive through; therefore, a Special Use Permit is required.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

Per the Downtown Centennial Plan threshold requirements the new proposed Drive-Through
qualifies a new development on-site which meets the definition of a Major Site Development
Plan Review, with a covenant signed for all future streetscape and civil improvements because of
the partial block frontage.
The subject site is currently developed with a 7,640 square-foot commercial building. The
applicant has proposed to utilize 2,148 square feet of interior space located on the northern
perimeter of the building for the proposed restaurant and Drive-Through. The submitted building
elevations indicate that the existing building height and dimensions will remain unchanged. The
applicant has proposed faade improvements through conceptual renderings, which will be
addressed at a later date through building permit review.
The floor plan shows a typical layout for a Restaurant with Drive-Through. Dining room seating
is depicted for 73 patrons. The outdoor patio adjacent to Main Street provides an additional 16
seats, with 48 additional seats provided in the rear outdoor patio area. The service area shows
reasonable queuing area in front of the counter, as well as a drive-through service area, ADA
accessible restrooms and food preparation area.
The applicant has provided a two-foot landscape buffer with five-gallon Texas Ranger shrubs
along both sides of the proposed Drive-Through on the east perimeter of the subject site adjacent
to the alleyway. This landscape buffer expands to approximately eight feet along a portion of the
northeastern perimeter of the drive through, then discontinues along the northern perimeter of the
Drive-Through, providing insufficient screening of the use and therefore requiring a Special Use
Permit.
This parcel is currently served by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) but does not
have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will
need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and backflow
retrofit. It should be noted that the meter serving this parcel is located on Imperial Avenue and
the above-ground backflow prevention assembly will be within the right-of-way unless the
service is relocated to the parcel. There is currently no water main located within Main Street to
serve the parcel directly.
The subject site is currently accessed by Main Street, which is classified as a Primary Arterial
street by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the alleyway located to the east of the
subject site. The applicant has requested Waivers of the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan
permanent parking lot screening standards to allow no parking lot screening fence where such is
required. Staff has determined the requested Waiver will have minimal negative impact to
development surrounding area, as the subject site is located adjacent to a parking lot to the north
and an alleyway to the east and is appropriate for this area of the Downtown Centennial Plan;
therefore, staff recommends approval of this project with conditions.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

1.
The subject tenant space was previously approved to operate as a general retail use. The
proposed Restaurant with Drive-Through use is compatible with the surrounding land uses
and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site currently developed with an existing 7,640 square-foot commercial
building that is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property from Main Street, a
100-foot Primary Arterial or the adjacent alleyway to the east of the subject site.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health safety and
general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions. Staff has added a condition of approval to Special Use Permit
(SUP-66544) for a Required Review (public hearing) one year after the final date of
approval.
5.
A Special Use Permit is required for the proposed Drive-Through as the use does not meet
screening requirements listed in Conditional Use Regulation #2 listed in Title 19.12.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

1.

The proposed commercial development is located in the Downtown Centennial Plan
Overlay, will serve as a restaurant use that is complementary to the other restaurants and
general retail uses in the neighborhood and is the type of use that is encouraged in the
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District.
2.
This project is consistent with the General Plan and the uses allowed in the Downtown
Centennial Plan Overlay District. However, it is not consistent with the parking lot
screening standards in the Downtown Centennial Plan.
3.

Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property from Main Street, a
100-foot Primary Arterial, or the adjacent alleyway to the east of the subject site. These
streets are sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the proposed use.
4.
The submitted building elevations indicate that the existing building height and dimensions
will remain unchanged. The applicant has indicated new grey stucco will be placed over
the existing CMU walls with a new aluminum storefront system. The applicant has
proposed additional faade improvements through conceptual renderings, which will be
addressed at a later date through building permit review.
5.

The submitted building elevations indicate that the existing building height and
dimensions will remain unchanged.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

6.
general welfare.
The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection; therefore,
appropriate measures will be taken to protect the health, safety and general welfare.
for a Secondhand Dealer of used restaurant equipment located at 1317 South
12/19/01
Main Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
request.
The Planning Department refunded a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP08/28/08
28999) for a proposed Manufacturing, Heavy Facility at 1317 South Main
Street.

09/01/16

A Code Enforcement case (#156075) was processed for graffiti on the
06/17/15
building located at 1311 South Main Street. The case has not been resolved.
A meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal process and
08/11/16
procedures for a Special Use Permit and Site Development Plan Review for a
proposed Restaurant with a Drive-Through use.
A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff visited the site and found a vacant tenant space with trash and debris
scattered throughout the site. In addition, staff observed razor wire on the top
of the rear fence on-site.
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]


Site Area
Net Acres
0.46
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
General Retail
C (Commercial)
North
Undeveloped
C (Commercial)
South
East
West
Undeveloped
Auto Repair Garage,
Major
Undeveloped
Multi-Family
Residential
General Retail
Auto Repair Garage,
Major

C-M
(Commercial/Industrial)
C-M
C (Commercial)
C-M
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General Commercial

R-4 (High Density
Residential)
C (Commercial)
C-M
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Downtown South
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

Pursuant to Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Min. Setbacks
Front
70% along Property Line
100%
Side (north)
N/A
47 Feet
Side (south)
N/A
0 Feet
N/A
60 Feet
Rear
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
a Roof or
Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Compliance
Pursuant to Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:

Required
Landscape
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Area
Parking Area
Ten square-feet per parking
50 SF
1,741 SF
Landscaping
space
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Main Street
Primary Arterial
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section

and Highways
80
Required
Provided
Compliance
Five-foot wide amenity
N*
Zero feet
zone
15 feet
Y
36-inch box trees at 15 to
20 feet intervals along
0 Trees (existing)
N*
Main Street.
*A covenant running with the land will be required to obtain the property owners consent for
JB
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 [PRJ-66201]

Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
2,148 SF
1:50 SF of
(1,185 indoor
seating
Restaurant
seating & 963
area plus
with Drive
SF gross
88
1:200 of
Through
remaining) w/
remaining
Outdoor patio
floor area
1,730 SF
General Retail 5,492 SF
1:175 SF
32
120
5
Y*
115
5
4
1
Y*
Waivers
Requirement
Install parking lot screening
fence adjacent to the right-ofway
Request
To allow no installation
of Parking Lot
Screening Fence
Approval
JB
SUP-66544
SUP-66544
SUP-66544 and SDR-66545 - REVISED
77bA7
77bA
AbbA7bbA7
77777b7777
AbbA7bbA7
77777b7777
b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7b b
A777777777777b777777777777777777777777777777b777777777777777777777777
b
A7A
77 777 b77A777777777 7777

A777 7 7A7777 7 7A77A77 7777
77 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 777 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

b b 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 b A 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 b 77 A 7
A7A7
bA
A7
A
AbbA
A
A7A
b7
A7
777
777
AbbA77A
A77
A77A
7bA
777bbA
7bA7
A77A
A7b
7A7Ab
777bbA
7
7bA
7
7bb
bA
777bbA7
77777A
bA7777
bA 7
A777777777777b777777777777777777777777777777b777777777777777777777777
b
A7A
77 777 b77A777777777 7777

A777 7 7A 777 7 7A7 A77 7777
77 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 777 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

A7
A
AbbA
7A
A7A
b7
A7
bA
A7A7
b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7b b
b b 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 b A 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 b 77 A 7
777
777
SUP-66544 [PRJ-66201] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-66545 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN

STREET INVESTMENTS III, LLC
1311 SOUTH MAIN STREET
09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16
A77
7777
777
b
bA7
7 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7
7
7
7
A7 77
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
77
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7777b7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
b77777777
7777777777777)77777
777777777777777
7777)777777)77
777777)77777A77777
7777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777777)
777777777)7777777
777777777777 )777777
7777777777777777
7777777777777
77777777 77777)777
7777777777777)77
7777
777)7)777777777
777777777777777)77
7777777777777777
77777777777
777777777
77
77

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 11, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66545 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66544 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN STREET INVESTMENTS III, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED RESTAURANT
WITH DRIVE-THROUGH WITH A WAIVER OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN
PARKING LOT SCREENING REQUIREMENTS on 0.46 acres at 1311 South Main Street
(APN 162-03-110-131), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66201].
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-66545
SDR-66545
SDR 66545
Main Street Investments, LLC
1319 S Main Street

Proposed 2.15 thousand square foot coffee shop with drive through.
Proposed Use
818.58

AM Peak Hour
COFFEE/DONUT SHOP WITH DRIVETHRU [1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour
2.15
100.58
42.80
1,760
216
92

Main Street
11,539
923
Charleston Boulevard
37,039
2,963

Main Street
Charleston Boulevard

25,350
50,900
This project will add approximately 1,760 trips per day on Main St., Colorado Ave., Imperial Ave. and Charleston Blvd.
Currently, Main is at about 46 percent of capacity and Charleston is at about 73 percent of capacity. With this project, Main
is expected to be at about 52 percent of capacity and Charleston to be at about 76 percent of capacity. Counts are not
available for Colorado or Imperial, but they are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 216 additional cars, or about two every seven
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66829 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAVID
DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A TRAILER/RV CAMP OR PARK WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SITES TO BE LOCATED ZERO FEET FROM A PUBLIC
STREET WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT SEPARATION
BETWEEN BACK-IN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED at the
northwest corner of Fremont Street and 11th Street (APNs 139-35-201-004 and 139-35-211027), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-66732]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]
6. Protest Postcard - SUP-66829 and SUP-66831 [PRJ-66732]
SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 [PRJ-66732]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT,
LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66829
SUP-66831
SDR-66832
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-66829
SUP-66831
** NOTIFICATION **
34
NOTICES MAILED
202 - SUP-66829 and SUP-66831

202 - SDR-66832
APPROVALS
0 - SUP-66829 and SUP-66831

0 - SDR-66832
PROTESTS
2 - SUP-66829 and SUP-66831

2 - SDR-66832
JB

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Trailer/RV
Camp or Park use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow recreational vehicles sites to be
located zero feet from a public street where 15 feet is required.
6.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a six-foot separation between
back-in recreational vehicles where 10 feet is required.
7.
8.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Single Room
Occupancy Residence use.
JB

Conditions Page Two
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP66829) and Special Use Permit (SUP-66831) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan/landscape plan date stamped
10/06/16 and building elevations date stamped 09/15/16, except as amended by conditions
herein.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
JB

7.

8.
9.
Public Works
10.
Dedicate a 10-foot radius on the southwest corner of Ogden Avenue and 11th Street prior
to the issuance of any permits.
11.
In accordance with Title 13.56.040, remove all substandard public street improvements and
unused driveway cuts on Ogden Avenue and 11th Street adjacent to this site and replace
with new improvements meeting current City Standards concurrent with development of
this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at
its original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
12.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as
to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access
drives and abutting street intersections.
13.

Fremont Street and 11th Street public rights-of-way prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of
the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any
successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment
Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the Land
Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
JB

14.
JB

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for two Special Use Permits and a Major Amendment to an approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) to convert a portion of an existing shopping center into
Single Room Occupancy Residence with seven interior rooms and a 16-unit Trailer/RV Camp or
Park use located at the northwest corner of Fremont Street and 11th Street.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for the proposed Trailer/RV Camp or Park use with
Waivers to allow vehicles to be parked zero feet from a public street where 15 feet is
required and to allow a six-foot separation between back-in recreational vehicles where 10
feet is required in a C-2 (General Commercial) zone district. Staff supports the requests.
A Special Use Permit is required for the proposed Single Room Occupancy use in a C-2
(General Commercial) zone district. Staff supports the requests.
A Site Development Plan Review is required for the conversion of the previously approved
shopping center outdoor plaza area and general retail space into an outdoor courtyard and
pool associated with the proposed Trailer/RV Camp or Park use.
Per the Downtown Centennial Plan threshold requirements, the change of use within a
portion of a Shopping Center into a Trailer/RV Camp or Park use and Single Room
Occupancy Residence qualifies under the Change of Use Category of the Threshold
Requirements.
The applicant has indicated in the submitted justification letter that they intend to rent the 16unit Trailer/RV Camp or Park spaces in conformance with the parameters of a Single Room
Occupancy Residence.
ANALYSIS
On October 2nd, 2013 the City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49548)
and three associated Special Use Permits (SUP-49549, 49552 and 49553) for three TavernLimited uses onsite. These entitlements approved a 50,768 square-foot Shopping Center on the
subject site.
The subject site is located with the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district, within the Las
Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan East Village district. The applicant has proposed to demolish
the northern wing of the building located on the northern perimeter of the site; the remaining
western wing adjacent to the alleyway will be utilized as a seven-unit Single Family Occupancy
JB

Residence. In addition, the applicant has proposed to consolidate the adjacent undeveloped lot
located to the north at 130 North 11th Street into the subject site. This additional area will be
incorporated into the subject site to accommodate a proposed 16-unit Trailer/RV Camp or Park
use on-site.
A Single Room Occupancy Residence is described in Title 19.12 as: A residential facility in
which furnished rooms are rented on a weekly or monthly basis and which provides common
facilities and services for laundry, cleaning and meals. According to the submitted justification
letter and floor plan, the proposed use meets the definition outlined above. There are no
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use. This use is permitted in the C-2
(General Commercial) zoning district with an approved Special Use Permit.
A Trailer/RV Camp or Park is described in Title 19.12 as: Any lot or tract of land used, or
intended to be used, for the renting of space to accommodate two or more recreational vehicles.
Minimum Special Use Requirements:
1. The maximum density permitted in a recreational vehicle park is 20 recreational vehicle sites
per acre.
The subject site is approximately 1.30 acres in size. The applicant has proposed 16 recreational
vehicle sites for the subject location, which is below the maximum of 20 recreational vehicle site
per acre.
2. Recreational vehicle parks shall have a minimum frontage of 100 feet at the building setback
line.
The proposed recreational vehicle site will occur on the northern portion of the subject site
adjacent to Ogden Avenue and 11th Street. As proposed the recreational vehicles will front
approximately 140 feet on the Ogden Avenue frontage and 150 feet on 11th Street frontage.
3. Recreational vehicle sites, office buildings, accessory buildings and other facilities shall be set
back at least 10 feet from any property lines. When adjacent to any property line adjoining a
public street, the required setback shall be 15 feet.
The applicant has requested a Waiver of this condition, to allow proposed recreational vehicle
sites to be located zero-feet from the public street where 15 feet is required. As depicted on the
submitted site plan seven recreational vehicle sites are located zero-feet from Ogden Avenue and
nine recreational vehicle sites are located 4-feet from 11th Street.
4. Vehicular spacing:
a. Pull-through recreational vehicle sites shall maintain 15 feet between vehicle parking on
adjoining sites.
JB

b. Back-in recreational vehicle sites shall maintain 10 feet between vehicles, to include
automobiles parking in adjoining sites.
The applicant has requested a Waiver of this condition, to allow a six-foot separation between
back-in recreational vehicles where 10 feet is required.
5. Recreational vehicle sites shall be set back 20 feet from any building.
All proposed recreational vehicle sites maintain a minimum distance of 20 feet from all existing
structure which will remain on the subject site.
* 6. A minimum of 10% of the total area of the park shall be reserved for purposes of open space
or recreational facilities. Open space area shall be of sufficient size and distribution as to be a
functional part of the entire park.
The applicant has proposed to install outdoor courtyard with pool amenities on the northern
portion of the subject site where the proposed Trailer/RV Camp or Park use, which is
approximately 8,589 square feet. This proposed outdoor courtyard covers approximately 46% of
the 18,541 square-foot area where the Trailer/RV Camp or Park use will be located.
* 7. All access drives shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and must first be approved by the City
Traffic Engineer.
The applicant has proposed to provide a 20-foot access aisle into the proposed Trailer/RV Camp
or Park use from the adjacent alleyway located to the west of the site, which meets the 20-foot
minimum aisle width that is required.
The subject site was previously approved via Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) with
no parking for the proposed businesses on-site. As amended by this request the proposed uses
onsite are projected to require 128 parking spaces based on the Citys normal parking
requirements for such proposed uses. The project is located in the Downtown Centennial Plan
area and is not automatically subjected to these standards. The applicant previously indicated via
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) that the subject site is located along a major mass
transit route, the availability of private parking lots in the area and parking provided along the
local streets will be adequate to meet the needs of the project. It is anticipated that most of the
patrons will be local downtown residents and tourists who will walk to the project.
Parcel 139-35-201-004 is currently served by Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) but
the services do not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and
plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, fire flow
availability and backflow retrofit. Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) Regional
Connection fees will be due for the additional units and proof of parcel lot consolidation will be
due prior to civil plan approval by LVVWD.
JB

This project will continue to have a positive visual effect to the surrounding neighborhood and
will provide additional short-term residential opportunities that are all pedestrian accessible. This
project is well designed and appropriate for the location. Staff recommends approval, with
conditions.
1.
The subject site was previously undeveloped with a portion approved to operate as a
Tavern-Limited and Retail Center use. The proposed Trailer/RV Camp or Park use is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious with surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is an existing commercial development with General Retail and TavernLimited land uses that is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
The site is primarily accessed via Fremont Street, an 80-foot Secondary Collector as
designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. This thoroughfare can
accommodate the proposed project. A secondary access is available via 11th Street and the
adjacent alleyway.
4.
General Plan.
5.
JB

A Waiver of Title 19.12 minimum special use permit requirements has been requested to
allow recreational vehicles sites to be located zero feet from a public street where 15 feet is
required and to allow a six-foot separation between back-in recreational vehicles where 10
feet is required.
1.
The subject tenant space was previously approved to operate as a Motel and Retail Center
use. The proposed Single Room Occupancy Residence use is compatible with the
surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious with
surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is an existing commercial development with General Retail and TavernLimited land uses that is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
The site is primarily accessed via Fremont Street, an 80-foot Secondary Collector as
designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. This thoroughfare can
accommodate the proposed project. A secondary access is available via 11th Street and the
adjacent alleyway.
4.
General Plan.
5.
JB

There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for the Single Room
Occupancy Residence use listed in Title 19.12.
1.

The project is located within the Downtown commercial core of the city that encourages
retail, office, restaurants and taverns. In addition the subject site is located directly adjacent
to an existing Trailer/RV Camp or Park use located to the west; therefore, the development
is compatible with the area.
2.
The project is permitted in the C (Commercial) General Plan designation and meets all
other policies and objectives of the City; therefore, is consistent and appropriate. With the
exception of the requested Waivers associated with Special Use Permit (SUP-66829).
3.

This project has direct access to Fremont and 11th Streets, both 80-foot public streets. In
addition, there is access along a public alley along the west perimeter. No parking is
provided, but given the location on a mass transit route and the pedestrian orientation of
the downtown area, no negative impact will be created for traffic in the area
4.
No new buildings or faade improvements are being requested at this time. Minimal
landscaping is being added in the plaza/courtyard areas and is appropriate for the site and
area.
5.

JB

The building utilized for the Single Room Occupancy Residence use will maintain the
original architectural aesthetic from when it was constructed in the 1950s. They will
remain harmonious and compatible with the area.
6.
general welfare.
The development will be subject to inspections throughout the building process and
therefore, the publics health, safety and welfare will be protected.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-37905)
for 22 Residence Hotel Units within an existing 68-unit Motel at 1028
07/07/10
Fremont Street. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval
of the request.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Required Review (RQR43945) of a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37905) for 22
01/10/12
Hotel, Residence Units within an existing 68-unit motel at 1028 Fremont
Street. Staff recommended approval of the request.
(SDR-49548) for the conversion of a Motel into a 50,768 square-foot Retail
Center at 1028 Fremont Street. The Planning Commission and Staff
for a proposed 2,000 square-foot Tavern-Limited Establishment use with
1,750 square feet of outdoor seating area at 1028 Fremont Street, Suite #100.
The Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request.
10/02/13
06/04/14
1,732 square-foot outdoor seating area at 1028 Fremont Street. The Planning
Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request.
JB


of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-49553) for a proposed 2,625 squarefoot Tavern-Limited Establishment use with 4,250 square feet of outdoor
seating area at 1028 Fremont Street, Suite #145. Staff recommended approval
of the request.
of the request.
11/18/15
of the request.
of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) for the
conversion of a Motel into a 50,768 square-foot Retail Center at 1028
Fremont Street, Suite #100. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission pulled a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP63566) for a proposed 21,144 square-foot Tavern-Limited Establishment
04/12/16
including a 17,479 square- foot outdoor courtyard and a 3,665 square-foot
second-floor outdoor patio at 1028 Fremont Street.

12/12/12

A Code Enforcement case (#33255) was processed for nine people living in
room #162 at this hotel - making all kinds of noise - children running around
08/03/05
all hours of the day and evening at 1028 Fremont Street. The case was
resolved on 08/30/05.
A Code Enforcement case (#47068) was processed for no air conditioning,
10/12/06
leak under sink, bath tub full of cracks at 1028 Fremont Street. The case was
resolved on 10/17/06.
A Code Enforcement case (#57263) was processed for high weeds at 1028
08/28/07
Fremont Street. The case was resolved on 09/24/07.
JB


A Code Enforcement case (#78666) was processed for vehicles with expired
06/03/09
tags parked on landscape at 1028 Fremont Street. The case was resolved on
06/04/09.
A Code Enforcement case (#98328) was processed for trash and litter at 1028
02/24/11
A building permit (#255362) was processed for Courtyard remodel, on-site
improvements and art work-big rig jig (Ferguson Downtown) at 1028
Fremont Street. The permit has not been issued. The permit was expired on
08/12/14
02/16/15.
A building permit (#255363) was processed for shade structures (Ferguson
Downtown) at 1028 Fremont Street. The permit was expired on 02/12/15.
A building permit (#255361) was processed for tenant improvements
08/13/14
(Ferguson Downtown) to change the occupancy from a Motel to Office/Retail
at 1028 Fremont Street. The permit was expired on 02/16/15.
A building permit (#320627) was issued for a 42-foot high tractor trailer
07/07/16
statue (Ferguson Downtown) at 1028 Fremont Street. The permit has not been
finalized.
A Code Enforcement case (#163908) was processed for graffiti at 1028
02/25/16
A Code Enforcement case (#168449) was processed for trash and weeds at
07/06/16
1028 Fremont Street. The case was resolved on 07/07/16.
A meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal process and
procedures for two Special Use Permits and Site Development Plan Review
09/13/16
for a proposed Single Room Occupancy Residence and Trailer/RV Camp or
Park use on the subject site.
A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff visited the site and found a well maintained commercial development.
During the visit staff noted the subject site was surrounded by construction
fencing.
JB


Site Area
Net Acres
1.30
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
General Retail
Tavern-Limited
Planned or Special
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South
Office, Other than

Listed
Trailer/RV Camp or
Park
General Retail
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Trailer/RV Camp or
Park
Auto Repair Garage,
Minor
Auto Parts
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Subject Property
East
West
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan East Village
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
JB

Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Fremont Street
Major Collector
11th Street
Major Collector
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
80
Required
Provided
Compliance
Five-foot wide amenity
Five feet
Y
zone
Five feet
N*
36-inch box trees at 15 to
20 feet intervals along
17 Trees (per SDRFremont Street, 11th
N*
49548)
Street and Ogden
Avenue.
*A covenant running with the land will be required to obtain the property owners consent for

Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Single Room
0.75 per
Occupancy
7 Units
6
Unit
Residence
One per
vehicle ,
plus one
Trailer/RV
16 Units
guest
18
Camp or Park
space for
every 10
vehicles
Shopping
25,978 SF
1:250 SF
104
Center
JB


Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
128
0
N*
123
5
0
0
N*
Loading
N*
4
0
Spaces
Waivers
Requirement
Recreational vehicle sites, office
buildings, accessory buildings
and other facilities shall be set
back at least 10 feet from any
property lines. When adjacent to
any property line adjoining a
public street, the required
setback shall be 15 feet.
Back-in recreational vehicle
sites shall maintain 10 feet
between vehicles, to include
automobiles parking in
adjoining sites.
Request
To allow recreational
vehicle sites to be
located zero feet from a
public street where 15
feet is required.
Approval
To allow a six-foot
separation between
back-in recreational
vehicles where 10 feet
is required.
Approval
JB
SUP-66829
77b
b
SUP-66829
77b
b
SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832 - REVISED
SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832
SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832
SUP-66829, SUP-66831 and SDR-66832
SUP-66829 [PRJ-66732] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-66831 AND SDR-66832 APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FREMONT STREET AND 11TH STREET
09/26/16
SUP-66829 [PRJ-66732] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-66831 AND SDR-66832 APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FREMONT STREET AND 11TH STREET
09/26/16
77
b777
7
77777%
777
777777777777
77777777777777
7
7777b
7777777777777
%77777%7777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777777
7777777777777777
777777777777787
777
7777777777777777
777777777777777
77777777777777
7777777777777777777
777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777777
77877777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777
777777777777
77777777777777
7
7
77b7
7

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66831 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-66829 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY RESIDENCE at the
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-66831
77b
b
SUP-66831
77b
b

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-66832 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-66829 AND SUP66831 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAVID DUGGAN - OWNER: 1028 FREMONT,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-49548) FOR THE CONVERSION OF A PORTION OF AN
EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER INTO A SEVEN-UNIT SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
RESIDENCE AND 16-UNIT TRAILER/RV CAMP OR PARK USE on 1.30 acres at the
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcards

paper use, backup
SDR-66832
77b
b
SDR-66832
77b
b

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66806 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: ZEUS1
INVESTMENTS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
A 241-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 660 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 1612 South 6th Street (APN 162-03-213-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter
5. Photo(s)
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: ZEUS1 INVESTMENTS, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66806
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
314
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
29
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Short-Term
Residential Rental use, except as amended herein.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 292-foot distance separation
from another Short-Term Residential Rental use, where 660 feet is required.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit with a waiver to allow a Short-Term Residential Rental
use at 1612 South 6th Street. The subject site is located within 241 feet of a similar use where
660 feet is the minimum distance separation required.
ISSUES
A Short-Term Residential Rental use is permitted in the R-1 (Single Family Residential)
zoning district as a Conditional Use. However, since the subject site is located within 241
feet of a similar use, a Special Use Permit and distance separation waiver are required.
Staff recommends denial of this request as the applicant cannot meet Title 19 requirements.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to utilize their single family dwelling as a Short-Term Residential use
at 1612 South 6th Street. While the use is allowed as a Conditional Use in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district, a Special Use Permit and waiver are required since the
subject site is located within 241 feet of a similar use. The subject site is also located within the
John S. Park Historic Neighborhood Special Area. The proposed Short-Term Residential use is
not compatible with the neighborhood goal of preventing properties currently zoned for singlefamily residential use from being converted to commercial use.
The Short-Term Residential Rental use is defined as The commercial use, or the making
available for commercial use, of a residential dwelling unit for dwelling, lodging or sleeping
purposes, wherein any individual guest rents or occupies the unit for a period of less than 31
consecutive calendar days. This use does not include a Community Residence, Facility for
Transitional Living for Released Offenders, or any other facility with dwelling units that is
specifically defined in Chapter 19.18. The proposed use meets this definition as the applicant
intends to rent out their single-family dwelling for short-term use.
1. The operator must obtain a business license to operate the use.
If this Special Use Permit is approved, the applicant will be required to obtain a business
license.
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
2. The use must comply on an ongoing basis with all governmental licensing and regulatory
requirements, including the payment of applicable room taxes and licensing fees.
If a business license is issued for the Short-Term Residential Rental use, it will be subject
to license renewal and annual compliance review to ensure that all regulatory
requirements are being met.
3. The use must comply with the Citys noise regulations as they apply to residential uses.
If this use violates the Citys noise regulations, neighbors or members of the public can
file a complaint to the Code Enforcement Division, which could result in a fine.
4. Vehicle parking associated with the use shall comply with applicable parking regulations,
and vehicles of guests and invitees shall not obstruct traffic or access to other properties
in the area.
If the parking regulations are violated or any traffic obstruction to other properties, the
public can either call the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department or the Business
License Division for non-compliance of business license requirements.
5. In addition to and independent of any enforcement authority or remedy described in this
Title, the failure to comply with a Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement or other
condition of approval associated with this use may be enforced as in the case of a
violation of Title 6 by means of a civil proceeding pursuant to LVMC 6.02.400 to
6.02.460, inclusive.
If approved, this application will be subject to annual review for compliance of the
special use permit by the Department of Planning.
6. The use may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Short-Term Residential
Rental use (measured from property line to property line).
The subject property is within 241 feet from another Short-Term Residential Rental use.
This Special Use Permit application is accompanied with a request for a waiver of the
distance separation.
7. The maximum occupancy of the residential dwelling unit shall not exceed the limits
provided for in LVMC 6.75.090.
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
Business License will conduct compliance inspections once a business license is

approved for compliance review.
The proposed Short-Term Residential Rental use will not be compatible with the surrounding
residential uses due to the existing similar use that is currently licensed within 241 feet from the
proposed subject property. The minimum special use permit requirements specify that the
distance to similar uses shall be at 660 feet; therefore, staff recommends denial. If this
application is approved, it is subject to conditions.
1.
The proposed land use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the existing surrounding land uses due to the waiver request of 241-foot
distance separation from similar uses.
2.
The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed
due to the similar uses within 241 feet.
3.
The subject site can be accessed from South 6th Street, a local street.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of the Special Use Permit on this site will be subject to conditions of approval
and business license compliance
5.
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
The proposed use does not meet all of the applicable conditions of Title 19.12. The use
may not be closer than 660 feet from any other Short-Term Residential Rental use. The
applicant is requesting a waiver to allow 241-foot distance separation.
There are no relevant city actions for the subject site.

07/12/16

A business license (#G64-01367) was denied for a proposed short-term rental
02/23/16
at 1612 South 6th Street.
Staff held a pre-application meeting where the submittal requirements and
09/14/16
deadlines were discussed.
Field Check
09/26/16

Site Area
Gross Acres
.24
CS
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759]
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)

R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
R-1 Single Family
Residential
Master Plan Areas

John S. Park Historic Neighborhood
Trails
Compliance
N
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CS
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT/ OWNER: ZEUS1 INVESTMENTS, LLC
1612 SOUTH 6TH STREET
09/26/16
SUP-66806 [PRJ-66759] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT/ OWNER: ZEUS1 INVESTMENTS, LLC
1612 SOUTH 6TH STREET
09/26/16
77
b777777
777
777
7777777777
7
777777777777777
777777777777777
7777777A777777777
7777
77
7
7

7
SUP-66806

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-66838 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: KAI''S LASH
AND FOOT SPA - OWNER: WEST SAHARA ASSOCIATES - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,350 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE SEPARATION OF 80
FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
REQUIRED at 6340 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-02-816-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-66634]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest/Support Postcards
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: KAI'S LASH AND FOOT SPA - OWNER: WEST
SAHARA ASSOCIATES
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-66838
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
414
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Massage
Establishment use.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby resquested, to allow a distance separation of 80 feet
from a residential use where 400 feet is the minimum distance required.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed 1,350 square-foot Massage
Establishment at 6340 West Sahara Avenue.
ISSUES
Per Title 19.12, a Massage Establishment use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district with approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver is required to allow a distance separation of 80 feet from a residential use where
400 feet is the minimum distance required. Staff recommends denial of the request.
ANALYSIS
The subject tenant space is located within an existing 54,395 square-foot shopping center. The
Massage Establishment use is defined by Title 19.18 as: A facility which is occupied and used
for the purpose of practicing massage therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52. This use does
not include the use accessory massage, as defined in this Title.
1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as a condition of approval has been added
requiring compliance with all applicable LVMC Title 6 requirements.
2. The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the subject site is located along Torrey
Pines Drive, an 80-foot Major Collector and Sahara Avenue, a 100-foot wide Primary
Arterial as indicated on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways
3. The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, City
park, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or any parcel zoned for
residential use.
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as there is a residentially zoned
property within 400 feet of the subject site to the west. The applicant is requesting a
Waiver to address the issue. Specifically, the applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a
distance separation of 80 feet from a residential use where 400 feet is the minimum
distance required.
5. The use may not be located within 1,000 feet of any other massage establishment.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no other massage establishments
located within 1,000 feet of the subject property.
6. The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.,
unless further limited by the City Council on a case-by-case basis.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicant indicates in the submitted
justification letter, date stamped 09/19/16, that the hours of operation would be 11:00
a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
The proposed use would be located within an established shopping center with retail and general
office uses. Other than the minimum use requirements in Title 19.12, there are no special
development requirements pertaining to this site. At this time there are no other similar uses
within the commercial development. However, the subject location is not compatible for the
intensity of the proposed use, due to the proximity of the subject site to the existing residentially
zoned property to the west; therefore, staff recommends denial of this request.
1.
The applicant has proposed to establish an eye lash and foot spa within the subject tenant
which is located within an existing shopping center along with other similar and
compatible uses. However, the applicant is requesting a waiver of minimum distance
separation requirements from existing residentially zoned properties. As a result, the use
cannot operate harmoniously with those protected land uses located in such close
proximity to the subject site.
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]
2.
The site contains an existing 54,395 square-foot shopping center with other retail and
general office uses. This site contains adequate parking for all uses, and the proposed use
does not generate the need for any additional parking spaces.
3.
The proposed Massage Establishment can be accessed from Torrey Pines Drive, a 80-foot
Major Collector and Sahara Avenue, a 100-foot Primary Arterial as indicated on the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways that has adequate capacity to serve the existing
development.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed Massage Establishment use will be subject to regular City and County
inspections for licensing and will therefore not compromise the public health, safety, and
general welfare or any objective of the General Plan.
5.
The proposed Massage Establishment does not adhere to minimum distance separation
requirements. The applicant is requesting a waiver of minimum distance separation
requirements from an existing residentially zoned property. As a result, the use cannot
operate harmoniously with those protected land uses located in such close proximity to the
subject site.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0016-86) from N-U (Non-Urban)
to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on this site. The Planning Commission and
03/19/86
staff recommended approval. Condition Number 4 of this approval prohibits
access to Torrey Pines Drive from the proposed commercial storage facility
except for an emergency access gate.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z12/22/87
0016-86(2)] for proposed retail shops, restaurant and bar, and automobile lube
shop on the subject site. Staff recommended approval.
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]

The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review [Z-0016-86(3)] for a
05/24/88
revised plot plan of a proposed retail commercial center on this site consisting
of 64,854 square feet. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0179-00) for a
01/03/01
Restaurant Service Bar at 6352-6354 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0121-01) to allow
10/17/01
secondhand sales in conjunction with a sporting goods store at 6360 West
Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council denied an appeal of the Planning Commission denial vote
for a Special Use Permit (SUP-3394) for a proposed 40-foot tall, 14-foot by
02/16/05
48-foot Off-Premise Advertising Sign on the subject site. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council denied a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-10236) for
a proposed 40-foot high, 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Advertising
04/19/06
(Billboard) Sign at 6390 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission and
Staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-13478) for a proposed
07/19/06
Secondhand Dealer (clothing) at 6378 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-24533) for a
11/21/07
Secondhand Dealer at 6338 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval.
Required Request Review (RQR-29731) was administratively approved for a
10/23/08
One-Year Minor Review of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-24533) for
a Secondhand Dealer at 6338 West Sahara Avenue.
for a proposed 2,700 square-foot Secondhand Dealer (Childrens Accessories)
10/21/09
use at 6360 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission and Staff
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA43991) to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and change the future land use
04/18/12
designation on various parcels within the Redevelopment Area to Commercial
or Mixed use. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of
the request.

06/03/91
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]

There are no related Building Permits/Business Licenses associated with this site.
Submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit application were discussed
09/06/16
with the applicant.
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
09/26/16
Staff performed a routine field check and noted a well maintained commercial
development.

Site Area
Net Acres
5.34
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Shopping Center
MXU (Mixed Use)
Mini-Storage
Facility
Office, Other than
Listed
Restaurant with
Drive Through
Auto Repair Garage,
Major
Motor Vehicle Sales
(New)
Auto Repair Garage,
Major
Motor Vehicle Sales
(New)
MXU (Mixed Use)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
CN (Commercial
Neighborhood) Clark
County
C-1 (Local Business)

Clark County
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
JB
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634]
Master Plan Areas

Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Trails
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y*
*The subject site is located within 500 feet of the Citys jurisdictional boundary with Clark
County.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Torrey Pines Drive
Major Collector
Sahara Avenue
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
100
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
54,395 SF
1:250 SF
218
Center
218
300
Y
211
7
291
9
Y
Waivers
Requirement
The use may not be located
within 400 feet of any
church/house of worship,
school, City park, individual
care center licensed for more
than 12 children, or any parcel
zoned for residential use.
Request
To allow a distance
separation of 80 feet
from a residential use
where 400 feet is the
minimum distance
required
Denial
JB
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838
SUP-66838 [PRJ-66634] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: KAI'S LASH AND FOOT SPA - OWNER:
WEST SAHARA ASSOCIATES
6340 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
09/26/16
77bA77b7AAbA7A7A7A77A
AAA7AbA77777777777A77
A7AA7A77A7A77A7A7Ab7A77
77A7A77777777Ab7777
7A7A77b77b7777:7
7
7
777
7
7
7
77
77777
7777
7
77777777777777
7777777777777777
777777777777777777
777777777777
77777777777
7777777777:777777
77777:77777777777
777777777777777
7777777:77:777777777
7:7777777777
77777777777777
77777777777b77
77777777777777
77777:777777777777
777:777777777777:7
777:777777777777
77777777777777
7777
7
777777777777777
7777777777777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777
7
7777777777:777
77
7777A777
7777777777
SUP-66838
777777777777
77777777777:7
7777777777777:7
77777777777
77777777777777 777
77777777777:77777
7:7
777777
7777
SUP-66838

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
MSP-66826 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WMCV
PHASE I, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) TO ADD TWO ON-PREMISE WALL
SIGNS ON BUILDING ''A'', TO ADD SIX ON-PREMISE WALL SIGNS ON THE PARKING
GARAGE, AND TO CHANGE THE LOCATION OF TWO EXISTING ILLUMINATED ONPREMISE WALL SIGNS ON BUILDING ''B'' WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN
PARKWAY CENTER SIGNAGE STANDARDS on 21.81 acres at 455, 475 and 495 South
Grand Central Parkway (APNs 139-33-610-014 and 023; and 139-33-511-011), PD (Planned
Development) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-66783]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: WMCV PHASE I, LLC, ET AL
CASE
NUMBER
MSP-66826
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
37
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
34
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
MSP-66826 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
This approval is a major amendment to the original Master Sign Plan approval (MSP6344). This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be
filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
2.
Conformance with the site plan, sign elevations and documentation date stamped 09/15/16,
except as amended by conditions herein.
3.
A Waiver of the Parkway Center Standards is hereby approved, to allow eight (8) new
large wall signs ranging in size from 2,296 to 19,429 square feet where 50 square feet is the
maximum area allowed per sign.
4.
A Waiver of the Parkway Center Standards is hereby approved, to allow eight (8) new
large wall signs to extend above the bottom of the second floor window sill where such is
not allowed.
5.
All signs shall contain on-premise advertising only, as required by the Downtown
Centennial Plan Parkway Center Standards.
6.
Prior to submittal for a building permit for any new sign in this Master Sign Plan
amendment, the applicant shall provide staff with an integrated Master Sign Plan that
incorporates all previous sign approvals.
7.
All large wall signs included in this master sign plan using LED illumination shall be
limited to static images that change no more frequently than once every six seconds. Such
illumination shall adjust brightness automatically in response to changes in surrounding
light levels so as not to be unreasonably bright. At no time shall the brightness of LED
illumination exceed 300 nits. Illumination shall also be subject to all applicable federal and
state standards governing the illumination of signs near federal and state highways and that
are more restrictive than those listed in this condition.
8.
Lighting fixtures for external illumination, if used, shall be shielded so that the light source
is not directly visible from adjacent properties or rights-of-way.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Conditions Page Two
9.
Safety.
10.
11.
Future amendments to the approved signage within the Master Sign Plan in conformance
with the Master Sign Plan and new signage in conformance with Title 19 standards may be
reviewed and approved administratively by the Department of Planning.
12.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting several changes to the existing Master Sign Plan for the World
Market Center development to coincide with upcoming trade show events. The changes are
summarized as follows:
Building A (495 South Grand Central Parkway): add two large wall signs to the north
elevation;
Building B (475 South Grand Central Parkway): move two previously approved large
LED wall signs (Signs F and K) from the south and west elevations to the southwest
corner of the building to create a wraparound display visible from Interstate 15; and
Parking Garage (445 South Grand Central Parkway): add five large wall signs to the east
elevation and add one large wall sign to the north elevation.
ISSUES
A Major Amendment of an approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) is required, as new large
wall signs requiring waivers of the Parkway Center Standards are requested.
The nearest single-family dwellings are located 1,320 feet to the northwest and 2,005 feet to
the southeast. These measurements are taken from the nearest approved or proposed sign.
Conditions of approval applicable to LED-illuminated large wall signs are imposed in order
to protect adjacent properties from potential nuisances and hazards.
Staff will require as a condition of approval an integrated Master Sign Plan that incorporates
all previous sign approvals.
ANALYSIS
Development within this site is subject to the Parkway Center Standards contained within the
Downtown Centennial Plan. It is noted that the placeholders for large wall signs on the
various building faces at the World Market Center were approved per Parkway Center Standards
prior to approval of the supergraphic sign ordinance; therefore, waivers were required to exceed
maximum area and height restrictions. The same waivers of the Parkway Center Standards are
required for the eight new large wall signs proposed as part of this amendment.
This is the seventh amendment to the Master Sign Plan (MSP-6399), originally approved in
2005. The applicant has been using temporary sign permits to enable the installation of large
wall signs on the parking garage. The current request would allow for these signs on a
permanent basis, where the on-premise content would change from trade show to trade show.
Typically, the signs are installed approximately two weeks before a trade show begins and are
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
removed one week following a trade show. The number of allowable signs on the east elevation
of the garage would double from five to ten. These signs would be made of SuperPrint and
UltraMesh banner material, although as in previous Master Sign Plan approvals the option of
using LED illumination is requested. The entitled (not currently installed) Signs F and K on
Building B would decrease in size from 18,000 square feet and 14,400 feet to 8,400 square feet
each and move to the corner of their respective facades to create an LED-illuminated corner
display. Images on these signs would remain independent of each other. Sign J on the north
elevation of Building A would be replaced by two building wrap signs, increasing sign area from
7,950 square feet to 38,858 square feet.
The Parkway Center Standards are silent with regard to sign illumination and defer to Title 19.
Per Title 19.08.120, electronic message units, animated signs and flashing signs are prohibited
within 200 feet of property planned or zoned for residential use unless the design of the sign or
its location and orientation ensure that the electronic message unit, animated or flashing portion
of the sign, or any other light from the sign will not be visible from the property planned or
zoned for residential use. The nearest property zoned for residential use is located 1,320 feet to
the northwest of the west facades of Buildings A and B. There are intervening buildings and a
freeway (Interstate 15) between the existing single-family dwellings and the World Market
Center buildings, although unobstructed views are possible. Another single-family dwelling is
located 2,005 feet to the southeast of the east faade of Building B; however, this property is
zoned C-M (Commercial/Industrial).
The new wall signs proposed on the garage elevations would face Symphony Park, the Smith
Center and a large surface parking lot. These signs match the size and design of the previously
approved garage signs, are appropriate for the scale of the building and are compatible with the
surrounding land uses. As with the previous approvals, these signs may be illuminated but must
remain sensitive to surrounding development. Movement of the two illuminated signs on
Building B to join at the southwest corner will actually create a less intense visual, as the signs
are reduced in size and will appear as a single wraparound sign. The two signs on the north
faade also would be visible from Symphony Park. They are appropriate for the scale of the
building and consistent with the previous sign approvals.
No new off-premise signage is permitted within the Parkway Center District, pursuant to
Subsection VII.E.6d of the Downtown Centennial Plan. Only products that are being offered
onsite may be advertised while the signs are visible. In addition, the signs illumination should
be such that neighboring properties are not negatively affected. As with previous approvals,
conditions have been added for protection of these properties.
FINDINGS (MSP-66826)
The proposed changes to the Master Sign Plan match the size and design of the previously
approved signs. These signs are appropriate for the scale of the buildings and are compatible
with the surrounding land uses. Staff therefore recommends approval, subject to conditions.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-97) from M (Industrial) to
11/23/98
PD (Planned Development) on 178 acres, including the subject property. The
The City Council adopted Ordinance #5238, thereby adopting the Downtown
07/05/00
Centennial Plan, which contains standards for the subject site.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0100-97(3)]
for a proposed 1,000,000 square foot commercial development (World
05/16/01
Market Center Phase I) and a waiver of off-street parking requirements at the
southwest corner of Grand Central Parkway and Bonneville Avenue. The
The City Council approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) for World Market
Center Phase I at 495 South Grand Central Parkway. The Planning
06/15/05
Commission, Parkway Center Architectural Review Committee (PC-ARC)
and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-6593) for
a 1,619,219 square-foot commercial center (World Market Center Phase II).
07/06/05
The Planning Commission, PC-ARC and staff recommended approval of the
request.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR10427) for a proposed four level parking garage with 2,175 parking spaces
01/12/06
and waivers of Parkway Center Development Standards at 475 Grand Central
Parkway. The PC-ARC and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Major Amendment (SDR-12636) of a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10427) to add five
06/07/06
levels to the approved parking garage and for the World Market Center Phase
III development. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Major Amendment (MSP-15823) to an
approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) to add signage for World Market
10/18/06
Center Phase II at 475 and 495 South Grand Central Parkway. The Planning
Planning and Development Department staff administratively approved the
relocation of a 4,472 SF wall sign from the west elevation of Building 2 (475
03/26/08
South Grand Central Parkway) to the west elevation of Building 3 (455 South
Grand Central Parkway) through the approved MSP-15823 action.
Planning and Development Department staff approved a Temporary Sign
Permit (TSP-33226) for the temporary installation of four (4) proposed 5301/29/09
foot by 56-foot wall signs on the existing parking garage structure at 445
South Grand Central Parkway, from 01/30/09 to 02/28/09.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]

Planning and Development Department staff approved a Temporary Sign
Permit (TSP-33790) for the temporary installation of one (1) proposed 62-foot
03/11/09
by 55-foot wall sign on the existing parking garage structure at 445 South
Grand Central Parkway, from 03/23/09 to 04/21/09.
Planning and Development Department staff approved a Minor Amendment
(MSP-34474) of a previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) for
06/11/09
additional signage within the existing World Market Center commercial
development.
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (MSP-36336) to a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) to add wall signage on the
12/03/09
existing parking structure at 445 South Grand Central Parkway, with waivers
of the Downtown Centennial Plan Parkway Center Signage Standards. Staff
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (MSP-40138) to an
approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) to add 11 on-premise wall signs
totaling 232,400 square feet on eight building faces within an existing
12/16/10
commercial development with waivers of the Downtown Centennial Plan
Parkway Center Signage Standards on 21.04 acres at 455, 475 and 495 South
Grand Central Parkway. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Major Amendment (MSP-50453) to an
approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) to add 14.68 acres to the master sign
plan site area; to add one 30-foot tall freestanding sign with four electronic
reader boards; to add six (6) 2,968 square-foot LED display wall signs on the
02/19/14
existing parking garage; and to allow LED on the 11 existing wall signs
approved by MSP-40138 where they were approved only for vinyl and
laminate materials on 35.72 acres at 445, 455, 475, and 495 South Grand
Central Parkway. The Planning Commission recommended denial; staff

09/29/05
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 139-33-610-023.
09/30/05
01/15/15

A building permit (#05003496) was issued for exterior signage (directional,
05/23/05
wall and freestanding signs) at 495 South Grand Central Parkway. A final
inspection was completed on 10/04/05.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]

A building permit (#06005248) was issued for an eight-foot tall monument
08/10/06
sign at 495 South Grand Central Parkway. A final inspection was completed
on 09/26/06.
A building permit (#07000039) was issued for wall signage (1,440 square
01/03/07
feet) at 495 South Grand Central Parkway. A final inspection was completed
on 02/03/10.
A building permit (#08000042) was issued for exterior signage at 455 South
03/27/08
Grand Central Parkway. A final inspection was completed on 07/11/08.
A Temporary Sign Permit (TSP-46460) was issued for one 22-foot by 18-foot
08/15/12
sign at 445 South Grand Central Parkway, to be displayed from 08/20/12 to
09/07/12.
A Temporary Sign Permit (TSP-55023) was issued for one 41-foot by 56-foot
large wall sign (King Koil), three 53-foot by 56-foot large wall signs (Sealy,
Sunpan, and Feizy Rugs); one (1) 50-foot by 56-foot large wall sign
07/15/14
(Lexington) on the parking garage at 445 South Grand Central Parkway, and
one 248-foot by 24-foot large wall sign (The New Sleeping Pill) on the
building at 495 South Grand Central Parkway, to be displayed from 07/16/14
to 08/15/14.
A Temporary Sign Permit (TSP-57586) was issued for five on-premise wall
signs that include one 53-foot by 56-foot sign (Tommy Bahama), three 5001/19/16
foot by 56-foot signs (Sunpan Trading, King Koil, Feizy Rugs), and one 41foot by 56-foot (Synchrony) sign on the building at 445 South Grand Central
Parkway, to be displayed from 01/16/15 to 02/15/15.
foot by 56-foot signs (Sunpan Trading, King Koil, Feizy Rugs), and one 41foot by 56-foot (Spring Air) sign on the building at 445 South Grand Central
Parkway, to be displayed from 07/16/15 to 08/14/15.
foot by 56-foot signs (Sunpan Trading, Tommy Bahama, Feizy Rugs), and
one 41-foot by 56-foot (Spring Air) sign on the building at 445 South Grand
Central Parkway, to be displayed from 01/19/16 to 02/17/16.
foot by 56-foot signs (Sunpan Trading, Tommy Bahama, Feizy Rugs), and
one 41-foot by 56-foot (Spring Air) sign on the building at 445 South Grand
Central Parkway, to be displayed from 07/11/16 to 08/09/16.
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Staff met with the applicants representatives to discuss submittal
09/15/16
requirements for a Master Sign Plan.
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
09/26/16
The site contains three large wholesale showroom buildings and a parking
garage to the north. All buildings were free of wall signage at the time,
except the west elevation of Building B, on which a temporary banner is
adhered about three-quarters of the way to the top of the building.

Site Area
Net Acres
21.81
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Trade
Center/Wholesale
Showroom
Off-Premise Sign
Warehouse
Off-Premise Sign
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
General Retail Store
MXU (Mixed Use)
East
Office, Medical
MXU (Mixed Use)
West
Freeway (I-15)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Subject Property
North
South
Master Plan Areas

MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Compliance
Y
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]

DCP-O (Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District) Parkway Center District
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet)
DC-O (Downtown Casino Overlay District)
PD (Planned Development) District
Trails
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
N/A
N/A
New Signs
Pursuant to the approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-6344) as amended and the Downtown
Centennial Plan Parkway Center Standards, the following standards apply:
Large Wall Signs: [1,2 (Bldg B); 3,4 (Bldg A); 6,7,8,9,10,11 (parking garage)]
Standards
Allowed
Provided
Maximum Area
45,000 SF (per previous approvals)
19,429 SF
Signs should establish a faade
Signs are in keeping with the large
Design
rhythm, scale and proportion where
scale of the buildings
not currently existing
Signs should be appropriate in color
Supreme Mesh, vinyl or LED are
Material
and texture to the building surface
appropriate for buildings
Internal LED; no external direct
Illumination
Internal/External
lighting is proposed at this time
Sign Plan Detail Summary (does not include names or logos)

Sign
Height
Area
Location
Type
Key
(feet)
(SF)
Existing Entitled Signs
A
Bldg C/
W elevation
wall
180
27,000
Bldg C/
W elevation
wall
180
27,000
Illumination
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Animation
Yes
Yes
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Sign
Key
Location
Type
Height
(feet)
Area
(SF)
Bldg C/
S elevation
wall
150
15,000
Bldg B/
W elevation
wall
150
15,000
Bldg B/
W elevation
wall
150
18,000
Bldg B/
W elevation
wall
150
18,000
Bldg A/
E elevation
wall
350
40,250
Bldg C/
N elevation
wall
300
45,000
Bldg A/
S elevation
wall
150
7,950
Bldg A/
N elevation
wall
150
7,950
Bldg B/
S elevation
wall
120
14,400
Freestanding
40
264
Internal
No
Freestanding
30
220
Internal/LED
Yes
SW corner
Grand Central Pkwy
and World Market
Center Dr
W side of Grand
Central Pkwy, S of
Symphony Park Ave
Garage/
E elevation
wall
56
2,968
Garage/
E elevation
wall
56
2,968
Illumination
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Animation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Sign
Key
Location
Type
Height
(feet)
Area
(SF)
Garage/
E elevation
wall
56
2,968
Garage/
E elevation
wall
56
2,968
Garage/
E elevation
wall
56
2,968
Garage/
S elevation
wall
56
2,968
Illumination
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Animation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Proposed Changes and New Signs

1*
Bldg B/
W elevation
wall
140
8,400
2*
Bldg B/
S elevation
wall
140
8,400
Bldg A/
N elevation
wall
125.75
19,429
Bldg A/
N elevation
wall
125.75
19,429
Not used
N/A
N/A
N/A
Garage/
E elevation
wall
50
2,800
Garage/
E elevation
wall
50
2,800
Garage/
E elevation
wall
50
2,800
Garage/
E elevation
wall
41
2,296
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
N/A
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
SS
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783]
Sign
Key
Location
Type
Height
(feet)
Area
(SF)
10
Garage/
E elevation
wall
53
2,968
11
Garage/
N elevation
wall
41
2,296
Illumination
Internal/
External/
LED
Internal/
External/
LED
Animation
Yes
Yes
*Signs 1 and 2 replace entitled Signs F and K.

Signs 3 and 4 replace entitled Sign J.
Waivers
Requirement
Downtown Centennial Plan VII.E
(6)(c) Permitted signs: Modular
wall signs shall be no greater than
50 square feet in area.
Downtown Centennial Plan VII.E
(6)(f) No building signs shall be
permitted above the bottom of the
second floor window sill. Signs
above this height may be allowed
for a maximum of two (2) tenants
per office building for the name of
a hotel and are limited to letter
signs, either illuminated or nonilluminated, with one (1) square
box sign allowed in which a logo
can be illuminated.
Request
Installation of 8 new large wall

signs ranging in size from 2,296
SF to 19,429 SF
Approval
Installation of 8 new large wall

signs ranging in height from 41 to
126 feet that will extend above the
second floor of each building
Approval
SS
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
77 7A
A 7
7 77 7
7
7 4
' 7
7 77 4
7 7

A 7 7 A
7 77 4
7 7
7 77 4
7 7
7 77 4
77
7 7 7

7 7

7
77
' 7 77 7A

77
7 77 7A
7
7

'
7 77 7

77
7 77 7
b 7

7 77 7
77 7b

b 7
77
7 7
MSP-66826
77' 7 '
b A
A A b b A 77 A b
A A 7 777 A b
b A A b 7 77 77 A b
4 77 A b
A 777 A b
7 777 A b
A b b A 7 77 A b
A b b 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 77 A b
A 7 A 7 77 A b
A 7 A A 7 A 7777 A b
7 A 77A A b
A 7 A A
A 7A 7 7
A A b b 77 A b
A b b A 77 A b
7 A 7 7 77 A b
7 A 7 777 A b
A 7 ' 7 A A 77 A b
7 A 7 777 A b
A
' 7 A
A A ' b A 7 '
A A ' A b b 7 7
7 77 '
777 '
77 7 '
7 A 7' A
7A b

A 77 7 '
77 7
7 A 7b
7 A
' A b
7 77 7

7 77 7A
7 77 7b
7 7
'
A 7 7 A
A 7
7 7
77
7 7
7 A

7 7 7 77' 4

7
7

' 7
7
4 7
7

7
7 77 7A

7 7 77 7A

77 7
77
77
7 77 7

7 77 7

b 7
7
A
b 7
7 7

7 77 7b
77
7 7
MSP-66826
b 7
A A 7' A 7'
A 7A b b 7 A 7 77 A b
A A 77 A
A A 77 A b
77 A b
A b b 77 A b
77 A b
A b b 7 7
A b b 7 A 7 777 A b
A A 7 7 A b
A 7 A 7 7 7 A b
A 7 A ' A 7 A 7777
7 A b
7 A 77 A b
A 7 A A
A 7 7 A 77 7 A b
A A b 77 A b
A b b 7 A 7 77 A b
7 A 7 77 A b
A 777 A b
A ' A A 77 A b
7 A 77 A b
A
A
7A b
' A b 7 77
77 '
777 '
7 77 '
7 A 7' A
b A 7
77' 777 '
A A 77 '
7'
A b 77 7
b b
7 A 7b
7 A
' A b '
7 77 7
A 7
7 77 7b
7 7
7 7
'
7 77 7
A
A 7 7 A
7 7 77
7 7 77
7 7
b 7
b 7
77b
'
A 7

A 7

7 77 7
77
7 7 7 77 7A

7 7 7 7 7' 4

7 7
7 4

7 7 7

77
7 77 7b
7 77 7
7 7
7

7 77 7b
77
77
7 7
MSP-66826
7A b
A A b b 7 A 7 77 A b
A A 7
A A 777 A b
77 A
A b b 7 77 A b
7 7777 A b
A b b 7 7
A b b 7 A 7 77 A b
A 7 7 7 7 A b
A A 7 77 A b
A 7 A A A 7 7 A b
7 A b
7 A 77 A b
A 7 A A
A 7 7 A ' 77 A b
A A b b 7 b 77 A b
A b b 7 A 7 77 A b
A 777 A b
7 A 7 777 A b
A ' A 77 A b
7 A 7 7 7 A b
A
7 A
A 7 A 7' A 7 '
A 7' A 7
7 77 '
7 7 7 '
b A
77' 777
A 777 '
7 7 7
A 77
7 77
7 A 7b
7 A
' A b
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826
MSP-66826 [PRJ-66783] - MASTER SIGN PLAN - APPLICANT/OWNER: WMCV PHASE I, LLC, ET AL

495 SOUTH GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY
09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16

09/26/16
MSP-66826
MSP-66826

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
DIR-67066 - DIRECTOR''S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY
OF LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a presentation of the Southern Nevada
Sustainable Systems Inventory, All Wards. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
NO ACTION
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
1. Link to Southern Nevada Sustainable Systems Inventory Document
DIR-67066

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE
NUMBER
DIR-67066
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
Document to be presented can be downloaded from:

ftp://ftp.lasvegasnevada.gov/Outbound/SUSTAINABILITY%20ATLAS/SNSSI.pdf
MV

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

11.01.16 PC Final Packet

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

11.01.16 PC Final Packet

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Todd L. Moody, Chair

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Planning Commission November 1, 2016 - Page 2

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

TMP-65809 - TENTATIVE MAP - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - SKYE CANYON PARCEL

VAR-66741 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RALPH SERVIDO - OWNER: RALPH

SUP-66792 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SOUTHERN NEVADA

SDR-66779- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOMERSET

Planning Commission November 1, 2016 - Page 3

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

ABEYANCE - GPA-66496 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

ABEYANCE - SDR-66499 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-66496, ZON-66497

ABEYANCE - VAR-66443 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEER SPRINGS

ABEYANCE - SDR-66447 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-66443, SUP-66444,

MOD-66820 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROMETHEUS AND

VAR-66821 - VARIANCE RELATED TO MOD-66820 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

VAR-66689 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WINOGRAD YUDKA - For possible

Planning Commission November 1, 2016 - Page 5

VAR-66818 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TRISHA K. NILSSON-LIGHT AND

WVR-66692 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOUCHSTONE LONE MOUNTAIN,

SUP-66544 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MAIN STREET

Planning Commission November 1, 2016 - Page 7

Agenda Item No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

Agenda Item No.: 2.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

Agenda Item No.: 3.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

Agenda Item No.: 4.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

Agenda Item No.: 5.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

Agenda Item No.: 6.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.

City Council Meeting

City Council Meeting

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED

In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Most Recent Change of Ownership

A field check was conducted and the site is undeveloped.

Details of Application Request

Existing Land Use

Existing Zoning District

Master Plan Areas

Agenda Item No.: 7.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.