JMM Mine Stability Report.0911 PDF

PRELIMINARY
SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT
Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

Highway 180
Fresno County, California
PREPARED FOR:
DOWNEY BRAND ATTORNEYS
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.
3160 GOLD VALLEY DRIVE, SUITE 800
RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95742
GEOCON PROJECT NO. S9631-06-01
SEPTEMBER 2011
Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011
Mr. Braiden Chadwick
Downey Brand Attorneys
1420 Rocky Ridge Dr., Suite 250
Roseville, California 95661
Subject:
PRELIMINARY ROCK SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

JESSE MORROW MOUNTAIN MINE
HIGHWAY 180
FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Chadwick,

We have prepared this Preliminary Rock Slope Stability Assessment Report for the proposed Jesse
Morrow Mountain Mine in Fresno County, California. The project area consists of approximately 824
acres of which under permit Alternative 4 approximately 198 acres are planned for development as a
surface mine and materials processing area to produce construction aggregate.
The accompanying report presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding rock slope
and waste pile stability issues on the site as they affect the proposed project. On the basis of the preliminary
data presented in this report and our professional judgment, we conclude that if the recommendations
presented within this report are followed, the project mining slope stability factor of safety will be adequate
for the proposed end use (agriculture and grazing) in compliance with the requirements set forth in the
California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). The currently proposed reclamation slopes for
the Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine will be benched rock slopes ranging from an average of 0.5:1 to 1:1
horizontal to vertical.
Please contact us should you have any questions concerning the contents of this report or if we may be of
further service.
Sincerely,
Geocon Consultants, Inc.
David W. Bieber, PGP, CEG, CHG

Senior Geologist
(2)
Addressee
Gary Luce, PE
Senior Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................................................. 1
2.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................. 1
3.0
SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................................................................................................................... 2
4.0
FIELD EXPLORATION ..................................................................................................................... 2
5.0
GEOLOGY........................................................................................................................................... 2
5.1
Site Geology ...........................................................................................................................3
5.2
Offsite Investigation ...............................................................................................................4
5.3
Groundwater ...........................................................................................................................4
6.0
SEISMICITY........................................................................................................................................ 4
7.0
PRELIMINARY SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES........................................................................ 5

7.1
Mining Slopes.........................................................................................................................5
7.2
Waste Pile Slopes ...................................................................................................................6
7.3
Reclamation Slopes ................................................................................................................7
8.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................. 8

8.1
Testing and Observation Services..........................................................................................8
8.2
Recommendations for Additional Work during Quarry Development ................................8
8.3
Slope Maintenance .................................................................................................................9
9.0
LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 10
10.0
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................... 11
FIGURES
1.
Vicinity Map
2.
Site Plan
3.
Site Geologic Map
4.
Aerial Image of Piedra Quarry
PHOTOGRAPHS
Cover Photo
Aerial image of the Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine Site
1 through 4.
Typical outcrops exposures observed on the Site
5.
Joint set crossing the Site.
6 through 8.
Slopes exposed in the Piedra Quarry
APPENDICES
A.
Conceptual Mining Plans
B.
Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Report
C.
Site Seismic Acceleration Data

1.0
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
This report presents the results of our slope stability assessment for construction of the project, which
consists of the proposed Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine (the Site), and has been prepared for Downey Brand
Attorneys on behalf of the project proponent, Cemex. The proposed project is located north of Highway 180
in Fresno County, California, approximately 20 miles east of Fresno, California. The approximate location
of the Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine project site is depicted on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1.
The purpose of our services was to prepare a pre-mining rock slope stability assessment and provide
preliminary recommendations for mitigation of slope hazards for mine planning and reclamation planning.
2.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Site is comprised of approximately 824 acres of undeveloped land located on Fresno County
Assessors Parcel Numbers 158-203-15, 185-020-01, 33-450-16, -18, -19, -23, and -26, 333-240-22, -24,
and -26, and 333-100-32, -44, and -46 within sections 11, 12, 13, and 14, Township 14 south, Range 23
East of the Wahtoke, California, USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. Of the total acreage making
up the Site, under the permit Alternative 4 scenario only approximately 198 acres will be developed for
the project (100 acres for mining, 56 acres for fill material storage and berms, and 40 acres for the
processing facilities). The remaining acreage would act as a buffer between the mining and processing
areas and surrounding land uses. There are not currently any buildings on the Site which is now being
used as grazing land. Land surrounding the Site is used for livestock grazing and farming. The proposed
Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine limits and surrounding features are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2.
The proposed project will consist of a new open pit type quarry for construction aggregates. Site
elevations range from 450 (valley floor) to 2,000 (ridgetop) feet above mean sea level (MSL). The
applicant proposes to mine the Site for aggregate material as an open pit mine to a bottom elevation of
approximately 375 feet MSL yielding approximately 75 million tons of aggregate material from the
Site over a 50-year period. Final reclamation pit slopes will be benched slopes cut into the native rock
with overall slopes ranging from 0.5:1 to 1:1 horizontal to vertical. The configuration of the mine
during the mining phases and the proposed final reclamation configuration are shown on the conceptual
mining plans in Appendix A. We understand that the post-mining end use for the Site will be
agriculture and grazing.
-1-
September 15, 2011
3.0
SCOPE OF SERVICES
We performed the following scope of services in preparing this report:
Reviewed published geologic maps, aerial photographs, in-house documents, and other
literature pertaining to the Site to aid in evaluating geologic conditions and the regional
geologic regime for use in the stability analysis. A list of referenced material is presented in
Section 10.0 of this report.
Performed a site reconnaissance to review general site conditions, performed onsite geologic
observations, and collected visible jointing and fracture data.
Visited the Piedra Quarry located approximately six miles north-northeast of the Site to
observe exposed slope conditions in similar geologic materials.
Prepared this report presenting our preliminary findings, conclusions, and recommendations
regarding slope stability conditions as they may affect the proposed project.
4.0
FIELD EXPLORATION
We performed our field reconnaissance on July 22, 2011, which consisted of performing onsite
geologic observations, the collection of joint orientation data where systematic joint features were
observed on the Site, and the collection of limited Schmidt-hammer rock strength data on the Site. Joint
orientation data was collected as dip and dip direction with a Cocla geologic compass (also known as a
Clarr Compass), set with a 15-1/2-degree east magnetic declination. Limited rock strength data was
measured using a Humboldt Manufacturing Company Model N Schmidt-Hammer.
5.0
GEOLOGY
Information concerning the geologic conditions in proximity to the Site was obtained from a review of
the Geologic Map of California, Fresno Sheet, California Geological Survey (CGS) map, 1965, and
from the draft environmental impact report (EIR) for the Site.
The Site is located on the boundary between the Sierra Nevada Geomorphic Province and the Great
Valley Geomorphic Province. The Sierra Nevada Geomorphic Province consists of an approximately
400-mile tilted fault block trending northwest to southeast. The western portion of the Sierra Nevada
Geomorphic Province (foothills) consists of multiple lithologies including thick Paleozoic and
Mesozoic marine sedimentary and volcanic rocks with varying degrees of deformation and
metamorphism. The Great Valley Geomorphic Province is a sediment filled alluvial valley about 50
miles wide and 400 miles long in the central part of California. Its northern part is the Sacramento
Valley, drained by the Sacramento River and its southern part is the San Joaquin Valley drained by the
San Joaquin River. The Great Valley is a trough in which sediments have been deposited almost
continuously since the Jurassic (about 160 million years ago).
-2-
September 15, 2011
5.1
Site Geology
A review of the CGS geologic map indicates that Site is underlain by Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks.
According to the literature reviewed, these consist of hornblende gabbro, pyroxene-hornblende gabbro,
clinopyroxene anorthosite, and other mafic plutonic rocks including some diorite. The general geology
of the Site is presented on the Site Geologic Map, Figure 3.
Micro-chem Laboratories performed petrographic analyses on five samples of rock collected from
borings performed in 2005 on the Site. Based on the petrographic analyses, the rock on the Site is
diorite and diabase. Copies of the petrographic analytical results are included in the 2005 Geotechnical
Engineering Investigation report prepared by BSK in Appendix B.
The geologic conditions we observed on the Site during our reconnaissance are consistent with those
represented in the reviewed literature. The Site is comprised of an east-west-trending ridge (Jesse
Morrow Mountain) formed by Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks that are bounded by valleys filled will
alluvial deposits. Pillow structures, lava features that were formed due to cooling in a submarine
environment, were observed in scattered outcrop locations. Post-emplacement joints are present in
exposed outcrops throughout the Site. However the jointing has a discontinuous and chaotic nature
where observed in outcrops. Typical outcrops where jointing was observed on the Site are shown in
Photographs 1 through 4. We did observe a single prominent joint set crossing the Site with a dip of
approximately 85 degrees and a dip direction of 330 degrees. The joint set is shown in Photograph 5.
The approximate location and orientation of the joint set is shown on Figure 3, the Site Geologic Map.
The exposed natural rock slope inclinations range from less than 2:1 horizontal to vertical to near
vertical with outcrop face heights of 20 feet or greater observed. The average inclination of exposed
natural rock slopes was estimated to be approximately 1.5:1 horizontal to vertical.
Based on the 2005 boring logs, the Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks are present beneath the Site at
depths ranging from 0 to greater than 200 feet. Rocks recovered from the deeper portions of borings
drilled on the Site have also been described as granite. The rock is described as highly fractured in
the weathered zone ranging from approximately 12 to 40 feet below ground surface, with fracturing
decreasing with depth. The referenced 2005 geotechnical investigation reported that the bedrock is
generally competent and minimally fractured below the weathered zone.
-3-
September 15, 2011
5.2
Offsite Investigation
We visited the Piedra Quarry approximately six miles north north-east of the Site to observe slope
conditions in the highwalls. Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks similar to those present at the Site were
mined in the Piedra Quarry in the early 1950s for the construction of Pine Flat Dam. Therefore, Piedra
Quarry serves as an analog for how slopes at the Site are likely to perform during and after onsite
mining. Slopes in the Piedra Quarry appear to be globally stable at slopes ranging from near-vertical to
1:1 horizontal to vertical at slope heights approaching 100 feet. As at the Site, well-defined persistent
jointing was not observed in the Piedra Quarry. The observed failure mechanism at the Piedra Quarry
is localized raveling and rockfall of loose material out of the quarry face. The general slope conditions
in the Piedra Quarry are shown in Photographs 6 through 8.
5.3
Groundwater
Jesse Morrow Mountain is bounded by alluvial valleys. The Kings River flows through the valley to
the north of Jesse Morrow Mountain. Wahtoke Creek and the concrete-lined Main and Friant Kern
Canals run through the valley to the south of Jesse Morrow Mountain. One seasonal spring was
observed on the south-facing portion of the Site. Two additional seasonal springs are shown on the
north side of the Site on the Hume 7-1/2 degree topographic map, a portion of which was used as the
base for the Site Plan, Figure 2.
Groundwater was not reported in exploratory borings and test pits excavated on the Site in 2005 and
mining is not expected to occur below the top of the saturated groundwater zone.
6.0
SEISMICITY
Based on our observations on the Site and a review of geologic maps and reports, the Site is not located
on any known active fault trace. In addition, the Site is not contained within a Special Studies
Earthquake Fault Zone (formerly referred to as an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone).
In order to determine the distance of known active faults within 50 miles of the Site, we used the
computer program EQFAULT, (Version 3, Blake, 2000). EQFAULT is a program for performing a
fault search, and a 50-mile radius is used because seismic attenuation is generally sufficient to
minimize damage to most structures at distances greater than 50 miles. Principal references used within
EQFAULT in selecting faults to be included are Jennings (1975), Anderson (1984) and Wesnousky
(1986). No known active faults were reported to occur within 50 miles of the Site. The closest reported
active fault to the Site is the Foothills Fault System, 51 miles from the Site.
-4-
September 15, 2011
The results of the EQFAULT query indicate that the Foothills Fault System is the closest source of
potential ground motion at the Site. The CGS maintains a web-based computer model that estimates
probabilistic seismic ground motions for any location within California. The computer model estimates
the Design Basis Earthquake ground motion, which is defined as the Peak Ground Acceleration
(PGA) with a 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years (475-year return period). For a location founded
on firm rock such as the Site, the estimated PGA is approximately 0.10g. The listed PGAs are
considered to be low to moderate. While listing PGA is useful for comparison of potential effects of
fault activity in a region, other considerations are important in seismic design, including frequency and
duration of motion and soil conditions underlying the Site. The Site could be subjected to ground
shaking in the event of a major earthquake along the faults mentioned above or other area faults.
However, the seismic risk at the Site is not considered to be significantly greater than that of the greater
Fresno region.
The site seismic acceleration data from EQFAULT and the CGS Interactive Probabilistic Seismic
Hazards Mapping Ground Motion Page results are presented in Appendix C.
7.0
PRELIMINARY SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
Due to the chaotic nature of the jointing observed in the surficial materials, conventional slope stability
analysis based on fracture orientation analysis was not deemed to be practical for use on rocks exposed
in outcrops on the Site. Therefore our preliminary stability evaluation was based on data presented in
the 2005 geotechnical report, observations of the bedrock outcrops and natural slopes on the Site, and
on observations of the mined slopes in the Piedra Quarry. Analysis of the slope stability of the
proposed waste storage pile was performed using the Hoek and Bray method for circular failure
analysis.
7.1
Mining Slopes
Based on our site visit and review of documents on the geologic and geotechnical properties of the Site,
we have reached the following preliminary conclusions regarding the site geology as it affects slope
stability:
The rock types identified are generally hard to very hard. Unconfined compressive strengths
for these types of rock typically range from 15,000 pounds per square inch (psi) to greater than
30,000 psi. These values were confirmed using Schmidt Hammer data collected from outcrop
data from minimally weathered exposures. Lower unconfined compressive strength values can
be anticipated in the weathering zone than in the unweathered rock mass.
Density of fracturing of the rock mass exposed at the surface appears to range from moderate
to high based on the block sizes shown in the surface float and outcrops.
-5-
September 15, 2011
We would expect that the rock mass beneath the weathering zone (at depths greater than
approximately 12 to 40 feet) is likely to be more massive and dense with few open fractures.
This is consistent with information presented in the 2005 boring logs we reviewed and on the
verbal reports from Cemex staff that fractures in the rock mass below the weathered zone are
spaced at intervals up to 15 feet or greater.
Based on these observations and the limited amount of previous exploration, our opinions regarding
slope stability and pit design are as follows:
Mine slopes up to approximately 50 feet high separated by minimum 20-foot-wide benches are
likely to be stable (Factor of safety at or above 1.3) at slopes of 0.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) in
unweathered and minimally weathered bedrock. However, additional rock fracture and rock
strength data will be necessary as mining progresses to confirm this. Initial slopes of 1.5:1 are
recommended within the surface weathering zone (depths ranging from approximately 12 to 40
feet) unless additional rock fracture and rock strength data is collected to demonstrate that
steeper slopes will be stable.
Raveling of slope materials and minor rock fall can be anticipated for the recommended design
slopes but these hazards can be mitigated by a number of methods and construction practices
including staging and temporary safety measures. Some examples include placing berms or
fencing to create pedestrian avoidance areas. Temporary waste material buttress fills or
backfills can be used to contain rollout. Temporary loop wire mesh can also be used to limit
rollout as well.
On the basis of the preliminary data and our professional judgment, we conclude that the factor of
safety for mining slopes as set forth above will equal or exceed 1.3 in the static condition.
7.2
Waste Pile Slopes
The currently proposed waste pile slopes for the Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine will be 2:1 horizontal to
vertical, the material that will be placed in the waste pile is expected to be a mixture of rocks up to
boulder size, sand, silt, and clay with a low expansion coefficient and low to plasticity. We assume that
minimal compactive effort will be used in placing the waste pile. Based on the nature of the material,
we expect that waste pile slopes will be globally stable at the proposed 2:1 horizontal to vertical slopes.
Our analysis indicates an estimated minimum stability of 1.6 in the static condition provided that the
surficial cohesive layer is removed. The overexcavation depth for the surficial cohesive soil layer is
estimated to range from 3 to 4 feet based on the boring data reviewed.
Localized erosion and localized small-scale slope failures are likely unless inactive slopes are
vegetated or otherwise protected. It is recommended that the waste pile be separated from the free face
of the pit wall by a minimum of 25 feet and that a drainage catchment ditch is maintained to prevent
direct discharge of sheet flows from the waste pile slopes into the mine pit.
-6-
September 15, 2011
7.3
Reclamation Slopes
The currently proposed reclamation slopes for the Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine will range from 0.5:1
to 1:1 horizontal to vertical. SMARA requires an engineering evaluation for proposed reclamation
slopes to determine whether they are suitable for the proposed site end use. Reclamation slopes similar
to those proposed on the Site have been present at the Piedra Quarry for almost 60 years without
apparent maintenance. We did not observe indications of global failures of the slopes observed at the
Piedra Quarry. Those failures observed were localized raveling of loose slope material and small-scale
block falls.
-7-
September 15, 2011
8.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our observations of the Site, the proposed pit walls should be globally stable in a static
condition at slope angles of up 1.5:1 horizontal to vertical or steeper while excavating material in the
weathered zone (upper 12 to 40 feet of material). Based on the preliminary data, unweathered rock
bench slopes 50 feet high and separated by 20 foot horizontal benches are expected to be stable (factor
of safety at or above 1.3) at the proposed mining slopes, but we recommended that additional rock
fracture and rock strength data be collected during mining to confirm this interpretation. Additionally,
based on the Design Basis Earthquake ground motion where the estimated PGA is approximately
0.10g, and based on the observed performance of the slopes in the Piedra Quarry, it is our opinion that
the rock slopes will be globally stable with respect to the expected seismic accelerations. Waste pile
slopes are expected to be globally stable at the proposed 2:1 horizontal to vertical slopes, but inactive
waste pile slopes should be protected from erosion. Based on the proposed site end use being
agriculture and grazing, it is our opinion that the proposed reclamation slopes will be globally stable
and suitable for the currently proposed post-mining use of the Site.
8.1
Testing and Observation Services
The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that we will be retained as
Geotechnical Engineer of Record for the quarry. It is important to maintain continuity of geotechnical
interpretation and confirm that field conditions encountered are similar to those anticipated during design.
In accordance with the 2006 CBC, testing and observation services by the Geotechnical Engineer of
Record are required to verify that construction has been performed in accordance with this report,
approved plans and specifications. If we are not retained for these services, we cannot assume any
responsibility for others interpretation of our recommendations or the future performance of the project.
8.2
Recommendations for Additional Work during Quarry Development
The recommendations contained in this report are considered adequate for preliminary pit design and
planning purposes. However, additional geotechnical evaluation should be conducted while mining is
occurring to refine the slope model. The following are our recommendations for future work in refining
the mine model and developing the pit:
1. Collect additional rock mechanics data including unconfined compressive strengths, fracture
orientation data and depth of weathering. Based on the reported fracture density in the core
recovered from rock beneath the weathered zone, conventional numeric modeling and analysis
should be practical for helping to assess mine slope stability in the unweathered rock.
Techniques that can be used to collect the additional information during mine development
include the following options:
Perform seismic refraction surveys to determine rippability correlations from the

velocity data.
-8-
September 15, 2011
Perform oriented coring of the rock mass at a minimum of five locations to develop a
three-dimensional model of the rock mass. Determine rock strength with laboratory
testing of the cores. Alternatively, large trench cuts could also provide some or all of
the desired rock strength information if permitted by regulatory agencies. Costs for
coring and/or trenching can be reduced by using planned mine roads to access
exploratory locations and the resultant road cuts to expose bedrock materials for
analyses.
As excavation is initiated and progresses within the quarry, collect rock mechanics
data for the exposed faces and recover samples for laboratory strength testing.
2. During pit construction, have a competent person map fractures in the face to look for obvious
adverse failure conditions (planar and wedge failures).
3. Scale rock slope faces to limit rock fall volumes.
4. Refine the mine plan with emphasis on the quantity balance needed for reclamation.
8.3
Slope Maintenance
Slopes designed as described above while stable from a slope angle perspective will present a moderate
risk of rock fall. Raveling of slope materials and minor rock fall can be anticipated for the
recommended design slopes, but these hazards can be mitigated by a number of methods and
construction practices including staging and temporary safety measures. Some examples include
placing temporary waste material buttress fills or backfills at the base of slopes and benches to contain
rollout. Temporary lope wire mesh can also be used to limit rollout. Additionally, loose material will
likely be present on the slope faces and at the tops of slopes, both as loose blocks due to opening of
joints and as material likely loosened during quarry operations. Personnel access should be prohibited
on benches below areas where potentially unstable blocks are observed until those blocks can be scaled
from the slope. Loose blocks should be removed starting on the pit edges and bench tops and then
working from the top of the slope down on slope faces. The area at the base of the slope should include
a catchment ditch/swale at least 8 feet wide and 2 to 3 feet deep. The ditch should slope towards the
face of the cut at least 4:1 horizontal to vertical. Berms or fencing should be placed along the base of
active quarry slopes to create pedestrian avoidance areas. We also recommend that a small berm or
temporary fence be constructed once access is not required on a regular basis. The need for protection
can be obviated by restricting access to the area to mechanized large mining equipment no closer than
6 feet from the slope.
-9-
September 15, 2011
9.0
LIMITATIONS
The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the
assumption that the soil and rock conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigation. If
any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed mining
plan will differ from that anticipated herein, Geocon should be notified so that supplemental
recommendations can be given. The evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous
materials or environmental contamination was not part of the scope of services provided by Geocon.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or their
representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the design team for the project and incorporated into the plans and specifications, and the
necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations
in the field.
The recommendations contained in this report are preliminary until verified during quarry operations
by representatives of our firm. Changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of
time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties.
Additionally, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from
legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated
partially or wholly by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and
should not be relied upon after a period of three years.
Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in
accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices used in this area
at this time. No warranty is expressed or implied.
- 10 -
September 15, 2011
10.0
REFERENCES
Benchmark Resources, Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine Conceptual Mining Plan, 2011.
BSK Associates, 2005, Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Processing Plant, RMC Pacific Materials,
Jesse Morrow Mountain, Fresno County, California.
California Geological Survey, California Geomorphic Provinces, CGS Note 36, 2002.
California Geological Survey, Geologic Map of California, Fresno Sheet, 1965.
California Geological Survey, Probabilistic Seismic Hazards Mapping Ground Motion Page
(http://www.conserv.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/pshamap.pshamap.asp), 2006.
County of Fresno, Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine and Reclamation, Draft Environmental Impact Report,
2005-2009.
Hoek, E, Bray, J.W., Rock Slope Engineering, 1984, (4th edition).
Turner, A. Keith and Robert L. Schuster, editors, Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation; Transportation
Research Board Special Report 247, 1996.
Unpublished reports, aerial photographs and maps on file with Geocon.
- 11 -
September 15, 2011
Rd.
Val
ley
Piedra
Quarry
Shaw
Elwood
Wa
tt
Rd
Riv
er
Ave.
Rd
.
Ashlan
Shields
Ki
ng
Sp
rin
gs
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
al
er
Rd
m
Tri
Alt
Ave.
Riverbend
Ma
in
Can
Ave.
Pie
dra
Belmont
Frankwood
Vista
Reed
Ave.
Ave
.
Scale in Miles
MacDonough
gs
Kin
Academy
Riverbend
Ave.
Bethel
Rio
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
63
in
Can
Ave.
al
3 1 6 0 G O L D VA L L E Y D R S U I T E 8 0 0 R A N C H O C O R D O VA , C A 9 5 7 4 2
P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Reedley
Airport
Ave.
Ave.
American
Goodfellow
Ma
Central
Jensen
Cove
Ave.
Ave.
Cana
Ave.
Ker
Ave.
Crawford
Academy
Ave.
Ave.
Annadale
Ave.
Central
A lt a
North
Annadale
180
180
Rive
SANGER
Ave.
Ave.
Jensen
ian
California
PROJECT
LOCATION
Fr
Sherwood
Forest
Golf
Club
180
Ave.
180
American
Ave.

Fresno County,
California
VICINITY MAP
S9631-06-01
September 2011
Figure 1
4
5
3
1,2
LEGEND:
Parcel Boundary
Original Proposed Project (400 ac)
Process Facility (40 ac)
Mining Area
Approximate Site Photograph
Location & Orientation
HIGH
W AY
180
1000
Scale in Feet
P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2

Fresno County,
California
SITE PLAN
S9631-06-01
September 2011
Figure 2
JMM-9
JMM-8
JMM-4
JMM-6
JMM-7
JMM-10
JMM-12
JMM-5
85
JMM-11
JMM-3
bi
JMM-2
bi
LEGEND:
JM-2
Parcel Boundary
Original Proposed Project (400 ac)
JM-3
Process Facility (40 ac)

JM-1
Mining Area
JM-4
Pluge Angle
Shear Zone (Dashed where approximate)

(Arrow indicates dip direction)
85
Qc
Formation Contact
(Dashed where approximate)
JMM-2
JM-1
bi
HIGH
W AY
180
bi
Approximate Soil Sample Location

Approximate Boring Location
Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks
Qc Pleistocene nonmarine (Pleistocene)
Qc
1000
Scale in Feet
Qc
P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2

Fresno County,
California
SITE GEOLOGIC MAP

S9631-06-01
September 2011
Figure 3
LEGEND:
Approximate Site Photograph
1
Location & Orientation
150
Scale in Feet
P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Aerial Image of
Piedra Quarry
S9631-06-01
Fresno County,
California
September 2011
Figure 4
Photo No. 1 View looking west of a pillow structure exposed in outcrop on the Site
Photo No. 2 View looking southwest of a typical outcrop exposure of dioritic rock on the Site
PHOTOS NO. 1 & 2

P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Fresno County,
California
GEOCON Project No. S9631-06-01
September 2011
Photo No. 3 View looking northwest of typical outcrop exposures on the Site showing the
generally chaotic nature of the jointing
Photo No. 4 Closer View looking northwest of typical outcrop exposures on the Site showing
the generally chaotic nature of the jointing
PHOTOS NO. 3 & 4

P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Fresno County,
California
September 2011
Photo No. 5 View looking southwest along the trace of the high-angle shear zone that
crosses the Site
Photo No. 6 View looking northwest of mined slopes exposed in the Piedra Quarry
PHOTOS NO. 5 & 6

P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Fresno County,
California
September 2011
Photo No. 7 View looking northeast of mined slopes exposed in the Piedra Quarry
Photo No. 8 View looking northeast of mined slope exposed in the Piedra Quarry
PHOTOS NO. 7 & 8

P H O N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 11 8 FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2
Fresno County,
California
September 2011
APPENDIX
'
0
00
200
0'
15
00
'
1000'
'
1500
1000'
'
1000
Caretaker
Residence
Residence
'
0
50
'
0
50
Access Road
Friant-Kern
Can
al
Alta
Main
C
anal
Existing Conditions Aerial Photograph

300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'
V:\DATA2\Blocks\Benchmark CAD Library\Logos & Images\BR_Secondary_Logo_cmyk.jpg
4990 Hillsdale Circle, Suite 400

El Dorado Hills, California 95762
Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 04-29-2011
JESSE MORROW MOUNTAIN QUARRY
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 1
1300'
1200'
1100'
Existing Ground Surface

1000'
.5:1 Slope
900'
800'
25' Safety Bench
700'
Berm
Overall 1:1 Slope
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
A
900'

800'
Fill
Storage
700'
.5:1 Slope
Berm
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
B'
A'
Phase 1
300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'

Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 06-20-2011
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 2
1300'
1200'
1100'
.5:1 Slope
1000'
25' Safety Bench

900'
800'
Overall 1:1 Slope

700'
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
A
900'
e
lop
S
2:1
800'
700'
2:1
Fill
Storage

Slo
p
Berm
.5:1 Slope
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
B'
A'
Phase 2
300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'

Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 06-20-2011
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 3
1300'
1200'
1100'

1000'
900'
800'
Overall 1:1 Slope

700'
60' Haul Road
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
A
900'
800'
2:1
700'
pe
o
l
S
2:1
Fill
Storage

Slo
pe
Berm
60' Haul Road
.5:1 Slope
25' Safety Bench
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
B'
A'
Phase 3
300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'

Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 06-20-2011
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 4
1300'
1200'
1100'

1000'
900'
.5:1 Slope
800'
60' Haul Road
700'
Overall 1:1 Slope

25' Safety Bench
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
A
900'
ope
800'
Sl
1
:
2
700'
2:1
Fill
Storage

Slo
pe
Berm
600'
.5:1 Slope
.5:1 Slope
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
B'
A'
Phase 4
300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'

Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 06-20-2011
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 5
1300'
1200'
1100'

1000'
900'
800'
60' Haul Road
700'
1:1 Slope
600'
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
A
900'

800'
Fill
Storage
Removed
700'
600'
Berm
Removed
.5:1 Slope
500'
400'
300'
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
B'
A'
Final Reclamation
300'
SCALE:
0
1" = 300'-0"
300'
600'

Phone: (916) 983-9193
Fax:
(916) 983-9194
SCALE: 1" = 300'

DATE: 06-20-2011
FILE: 188
V: 1.0
Sheet 6
APPENDIX
Geotechnical Engineering Investigation

Processing Plant
RMC Pacific Materials
Jesse Morrow Mountain
BSK G0518010F
Prepared for:
Mr. Peter Cotter
P. 0. Box 5252
Pleasanton CA 94566
August 5,2005
0BSK ASSOCIATES All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part ofthis document without the written permission of BSK is
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
nrnhihitorl
.
1415 Tuolumne St.

Fresno, CA 93706
(559) 497-2868
FAX (559) 485-6140
August 5,2005
BSK JOB G0518010F

Mr. Peter Cotter
P. 0. Box 5252
Pleasanton CA 94566
SUBJECT:
Geotechnical Investigation
RMC Pacific Materials Processing Plant
Jesse Morrow Mountain
Dear Sir:
BSK Associates has conducted a geotechnical investigation at the subject site for RMC Pacific
Materials (Owner, Client). The geotechnical investigation was conducted in accordance with
BSK's Proposal GF05 106 dated May 10,2005.
The enclosed report contains the results of BSK's geotechnical investigation that includes field
exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analysis, and provides recommendations for use in
preparation of plans and specifications for the subject project.
Please call if you have questions or comments concerning the report.
opportunity to be of service to the RMC Pacific Materials.
We appreciate the
Respectfully submitted,
Encl:
Report
Distribution:
Client
File
Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology
A California Corporation
Environmental Services Construction Inspection & Testing Analytical Testing
TABLE O F CONTENTS
Introduction
Objective and Scope of Investigation
Field Exploration
Laboratory Testing
Site Conditions
Site Description and Surface Conditions
5.1
5.2
Subsurface Conditions
5.3
Groundwater
Conclusions and Recommendations
6.1
Seismic Considerations
6.2
Site Preparation and Grading
6.3
Excavations
6.4
Surface Drainage Control
6.5
Foundations
6.6
Soil Corrosivity
6.7
Pavement Design
6.8
Slope Stability
6.9
Aggregate Stockpiles
Plans and Specifications Review
Construction Testing and Observation
Changed Conditions
FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Vicinity Map
Site Plan, Plant Site
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Field Exploration
Test Pit Logs
Appendix B
Laboratory Testing
Page
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

PROCESSING PLANT SITE
RMC PACIFIC MATERIALS
JESSE MORROW MOUNTAIN SITE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation conducted by BSK
Associates for the proposed RMC Pacific Materials (Owner. RMC) processing plant site at
Highway 180 at the Friant-Kern Canal Crossing in Fresno County, California. BSK was
retained as the geotechnical engineering consultant by RMC.
The general location of the site is given on the Site Location Map, Figure 1. The Site Plan
is given in Figure 2. Based on information provided by the client, building foundation
loads will not exceed 100 kips and 7 h p s per lineal foot for columns and walls,
respectively. For pavement design purposes, a traffic index of 4.5 has been assumed for
areas limited to car traffic only. A traffic index of 11.0 has been assumed for areas with
truck traffic. In addition, client provided deep boring information on the general site.
Specific depths of cuts and fills were not available at the time of our exploration, we have
assumed typical values of five feet.
In the event that changes occur in the design of the project, this report's conclusions and
recommendations will not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed with BSK
and the conclusions and recornmendations are modified or verified in writing. Examples
of such changes would include location, size of building, foundation loads, etc.
2.0 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

The objective and scope of the geotechnical investigation were set forth in BSK's Proposal
GF05106 dated May 10, 2005. The objective of the geotechnical investigation was to
characterize the subsurface soil conditions in the area of the planned construction and to
provide geotechnical engineering recommendations. The scope of the investigation
included field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and preparation of this
report.
3.0
FIELD EXPLORATION
The geotechnical exploration was conducted on May 26, 2005 under the oversight of a
BSK senior project engineer. Twelve test pits were dug, as indicated on the Site Plan,
Figure 2. The test pits extended to depths of twelve feet or refusal below existing ground
surface (bgs) and the test pit logs are presented in Appendix A.
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples to evaluate relevant engineering soil
properties. Laboratory tests included moisture content, dry density, direct shear strength,
plasticity index and expansion index. The laboratory testing methods and test results are
summarized in Appendix B.
5.0 SITE CONDITIONS
The following sections address site description, surface and subsurface conditions, and
groundwater conditions. These are presented based on BSK's field exploration,
information provided above, and published maps and reports.
5.1 Site Description and Surface Conditions
The overall site is located approximately eight miles east of the town of Sanger, California,
in Fresno County (see the Vicinity Map, Figure 1). The site lies within sections 11, 12, 13,
and 14, Township 14 South, Range 23 East, and the west 114 of section 7 of Township 14
South, Range 24 East Mount Diablo baseline and meridian (see the Site Plan, Figure 2).
The site topography is rugged, requiring four-wheel drive vehicles, for access and much of
the surface is covered by thick brush, making travel and visual assessments difficult.
The plant site is gently sloped north to south and used as a cow pasture. The plant site is
about 100 feet higher in elevation than Highway 180. Above the plant site is -the steeper
grade of Jesse Morrow Mountain, from which the quarry material will come for
processing. Below the plant site is a modest grade down to Highway 180. There are no
rock outcrops on the plant site.
5.2
Subsurface Conditions
5.2.1 Previous Investigation

In November 1998, RMC Pacific Materials, Inc. (RMC) advanced four borings at the Site.
Boring locations are shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the four borings was to determine
if the rock at the Site was suitable for use in the production of Portland cement concrete
(PCC) and asphalt concrete. The borings JM#l, JM#2, JM#3, and JM#4 were advanced to
depths of 125, 154,203, and 198 feet below the ground surface (bgs), respectively.
In JM #1, bedrock was encountered at a depth of 15 feet, with jointed weathered granite
(i.e. decomposed granite) above. In JM #2, the clay layer is about 4 feet thick, with
boulders extending to a depth of 30 feet. In JM #3, the clay layer was 3 feet thick and was
underlain by cobbles extending to a depth of 40 feet. In JM #4, decomposed granite and
boulders extended to a depth of 13 feet.
5.2.2 Current Investigation

The uppermost soil is a layer of silty clay to clay which is highly plastic and highly
expansive. The clay soil takes on a blocky structure at a depth of several feet. At the time
of our investigation, the clay soils were damp and stiff to hard.
After several feet, weathered remains of boulders or bedrock were often encountered,
sometimes containing a decomposed granite appearance. Where this profile was
encountered, the soils typically became cemented and refusal to backhoe digging
equipment occurred at depths of less than ten feet. Sometimes the soils became a whitish
dolomite soil which was hard and dry. Where the whitish dolomite was encountered, the
test pits were able to advance to the maximum depth with no difficulty.
No groundwater was encountered in our test pits, nor was any massive rock encountered.
5.3 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered at the depths explored during BSK's investigation.
However, the possibility of the groundwater rising to shallower depths below ground
surface may occur due to seasonal effects or other factors not evident at the time of the
investigation.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

From a geotechnical engineering standpoint, it is BSK's opinion that the site is suitable for
the proposed construction. Significant costs will be incurred managing the shallow clay
soils. This opinion is based upon the data collected during this investigation, BSK's
understanding of the planned improvements as described above, and the recoinmendations
presented herein being properly incorporated into the project design and construction.
6.1 Seismic Considerations
In BSK's opinion there are no unique geologic factors at the site which would necessitate
special seismic consideration for the design of the planned building improvements. Based
on BSK's investigation, no known active or potentially active fault zones are within 15
miles of the project site and the site lies within Seismic Zone 3. Use of the 2001 California
Building Code (CBC) seismic design criteria is considered appropriate, unless the project
design consultant requires more specific data such as an elastic response spectra or
characteristic site period. The following parameters are considered appropriate for the
structural design of the planned improvements:
Seismic Zone Factor, Z = 0.30
Soil Profile Type is SC
Seismic Coefficient Ca = 0.33
Seismic Coefficient Cv = 0.45
6.2 Site Preparation and Grading

The following procedures should be implemented during site preparation and earthwork
for the proposed improvements. It should be noted that all references to moisture content
and percent relative compaction are based on optimum moisture content and maximum dry
density as determined by the ASTM D 1557 laboratory test procedure.
1)
Vegetation, trash, debris, fill material, and the near-surface soils containing
objectionable organic matter should be stripped and hauled off site or used in
landscape areas. Within five (5) feet of the outer edge of structures, the native soil
subgrade should then be overexcavated to a minimum depth of four (4) feet below
finish grade or two (2) feet below original grade, whichever is deeper. BSK should
be contacted to observe such excavations to verify whether soft or loose soils, or
other buried features are present that would require additional excavation.
2)
All existing buried utility lines and subterranean structures, if located beneath the
area of planned construction, should be removed and relocated to a distance of at
least 5 feet outside the area of the planned improvements. All resultant cavities
should be widened to provide sidewalls with slopes as discussed below in
Excavation Stability and then backfilled with compacted engineered fill.
3)
Prior to the placement of any fill, the bottom of the excavation in the native
subgrade should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned to above
optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent. Excavated soils
should not be replaced within four feet of finish grade of structures. Within four
feet of finish grade of structures, select, import fill or treated native soil should be
used as compacted engineered fill up to the desired finish subgrade elevation. All
engineered fill should be placed in uniform layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose
thickness, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content,
and compacted to at least 90 percent.
4)
All select, import fill or treated native soil materials should be free from organic
materials or deleterious substances. Soils used within the top four feet of finish
grade should conform to the following criteria:
Maximum Particle Size:
Percent Passing #200 Sieve:
Non-Hazardous
Maximum Expansion Index
Non- to Low-Corrosive
3"
10 - 40
20
Native soils inay be treated with lime, portland cement, or flyash to achieve the
above properties. In the event that the client wishes to pursue the treatment option,
we recommend that BSK be contacted for additional testing.
BSK should be contacted for review of proposed engineered fill materials for conformance
with these recommendations three days prior to hauling to from the borrow areas.
6.3 Excavations
Soils encountered within the depth of the proposed improvements are generally soil Type
A in accordance to OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Slope height,
slope inclination, and excavation depths (including utility trench excavations) must in no
case exceed those specified in local, state, or federal safety regulations, (e.g., OSHA
Health and Safety Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926, or successor regulations)
unless stated otherwise herein. Type B soils are typically cut to a maximum slope of
0.75H:lV and extend to a typical depth of 12 feet at this site. These excavation
recommendations are based on soil characteristics derived from the test pits. Variations in
soil conditions will likely be encountered during excavation. BSK must be afforded the
opportunity to provide field review to evaluate actual conditions and account for field
condition variations not otherwise anticipated in the preparation of these
recommendations.
Temporary excavations for the project construction should be left open for as short a time
as possible and should be protected from runoff.
6.4 Surface Drainage Control

The control of surface drainage within the area of the planned improvements is an
important design consideration. BSK recommends that the final grading around ,the new
construction should provide for positive and enduring drainage away from the structures,
and ponding of water should not be allowed near the structures.
6.5 Foundations
Provided that the site is prepared as recommended above, the building may be supported
on a conventional footing foundation bearing on suitable native soil protected against
freezing. The foundation should have a minimum depth of 12 inches below finished grade
and a minimum width of 12 inches. This foundation, constructed as recommended herein,
may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure as given in the following table based
upon the thickness of the engineered fill material below the foundation. This value applies
to the dead load plus live load (DL plus LL) condition and may be increased by 113 for
short duration wind or seismic loads.
Thickness of Fill below Foundation, feet
0
Allowable Soil Bearing

2000
Fbr design purposes, maximum total settlements on the order of 1 inch are anticipated for
the foundation, based upon the foundation loads and upon the above allowable bearing
pressures and subgrade requirements. Differential settlements are expected to be 114 inch
or less.
An equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) of 305 pcf for passive earth pressure, 40 pcf for active
pressure and 53 pcf for at-rest pressure may be used in the native soils. An equivalent
fluid pressure (EFP) of 450 pcf for passive earth pressure, 28 pcf for active pressure and 37
pcf for at-rest pressure may be used in the select import fill or treated native soils. A
coefficient of friction of 0.34 may be used between native subgrade and concrete
foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be used between select, import fill or
treated native subgrade and concrete foundations. These values represent ultimate soil
strength values. BSK recommends that a safety factor consistent with the design
conditions be included in their usage. For stability against lateral sliding that is resisted
solely by the passive pressure, a minimum safety factor of 1.5 is recommended. For
stability against lateral sliding that is resisted by combined passive and frictional
resistance, a minimum safety factor of 2.0 is recommended. For lateral stability against
seismic loading conditions, a minimum safety factor of 1.2 is recommended.
6.6 Soil Corrosivity

A soil sample was analyzed in BSKYsprevious investigation to evaluate the potential for
concrete deterioration or steel corrosion due to attack by soluble salts in the on-site soils.
Based on the test results, it indicated that on-site, near-surface soils have minimal sulfate,
minimal chloride and a potential corrosive attack potential on buried metal due to
resistivity. We recommend that Type I1 cement be used in the formulation of concrete,
that buried reinforcing steel be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of cover, and that
buried pipe have a protective coating.
6.7 Pavement Design
Based upon an R value of 5 for the native subgrade, the following pavement sections are
recommended.
TABLE: PAVEMENT DESIGN SECTION
Traffic Index
4.5
11.0
Asphaltic Concrete
2 inches
5.5 inches
Aggregate Base
10 inches
28 inches
Asphaltic concrete should conform to Caltrans Type B and be installed in accordance with
the current Standard Specifications.
Aggregate base should conform to Caltrans Class 2 and be compacted to a minimum of
95% as determined by ASTM D 1557.
The top eight inches of subgrade in paved areas should be compacted to a minimum of
95% as determined by ASTM D 1557.
Because of the excessive thicknesses of Class 2 base required, it may be feasible to replace
a substantial portion of the Class 2 base with treated native soils. Should you wish to
evaluate that further, we recommend that you contact BSK.
6.8 Slope Stability

Stability of the quarry walls for short term excavation or long term reclamation above the
plant site is not part of this scope of work.
Within the general area of the plant site, the topographic map indicates that the existing
slope is about 8% and the existing elevation difference is about 80 feet. Based upon the
drawings provided, the maximum size of any single building or stockpile in the downslope
direction is 120 feet. A nominal cut of 5 feet and a fill of 5 feet would level out that large
an area. Using the minimum shear strength values from the testing program (i.e. 0.53 ksf
cohesion and 8 degree friction angle), the indicated factor of safety of a slope which was 5
feet high and 2H:lV would be 7.42, which is well in excess of the minimum 1.5 required.
From the topographic map, the maximum elevation difference between the road and the
plant site is about 100 feet. The lateral distance is about 800 feet. Using the minimum
shear strength values from the testing program (i.e. 0.53 ksf cohesion and 8 degree friction
ang1e)and a maximum soil thickness of 25 feet, the indicated factor of safety of a slope
which was 100 feet high and 8H: 1V would be 2.9, which is well in excess of the minimum
1.5 required.
6.9 Aggregate Stockpiles

From the drawings provided, the maximum aggregate stockpile width is 120 feet.
Assuming a 32 degree angle, the maximum pile height is estimated to be 38 feet. The
maximum pressure at the center of the pile would be about 4500 pounds per square foot.
The shallow clay soils have a lesser bearing value. It is our understanding that the
aggregate piles are not sensitive to underlying soil movement (horizontal or vertical);
therefore no soil improvement is necessary.
7.0 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW
BSK recommends that it be retained to review the draft plans and specifications for the
project, with regard to foundations and earthwork, prior to their being finalized and issued
for construction bidding.
8.0 CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND OBSERVATION

Geotechnical testing and observation during construction are a vital extension of the
geotechnical investigation. BSK recommends that it be retained for those services. Field
review during site preparation and grading allows for evaluation of the exposed soil
conditions and confirmation or revision of the assumptions and extrapolations made in
formulating the design parameters and recommendations. BSK observations should be

supplemented with periodic compaction tests to establish substantial conformance with
these recommendations. BSK should also be called to the site to observe foundation
excavations, prior to placement of reinforcing steel or concrete, in order to assess whether
the actual bearing conditions are compatible with the conditions anticipated during the
preparation of this report. BSK should also be called to the site to observe placement of
foundation and slab concrete.
If a firm other than BSK is retained for these services during construction, that o.ther firm
should notify the owner, project designers, governmental building officials, and BSK that
the firm has assumed the responsibility for all phases (i.e., both design and construction) of
the project within the purview of the project geotechnical engineer. Notification should
indicate that the firm has reviewed this report and any subsequent addenda, and that it
either agrees with BSK's conclusions and recommendation, or that it will provide
independent recommendations.
9.0 CHANGED CONDITIONS

The analyses and recommendations submitted in t h s report are based upon the data
obtained from the test pits performed at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2.
The report does not reflect variations which may occur between the borings. The nature
and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction is initiated. If
variations then appear, a re-evaluation of the recommendations of this report will be
necessary after performing on-site observations during the excavation period and noting
the characteristics of the variations.
The validity of the recommendations contained in this report is also dependent upon an
adequate testing and observation program during the construction phase. BSK assumes
no responsibility for construction compliance with the design concepts or
recommendations unless it has been retained to perform the testing and observation
services during construction as described above.
The findings of this report are valid as of the present. However, changes in the conditions
of the site can occur with the passage of time, whether caused by natural processes or the
work of man, on this property or adjacent property. In addition, changes in applicable or
appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation, governmental policy
or the broadening of knowledge.
BSK has prepared this report for the exclusive use of Client and Client's project design
consultants. The report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices which existed in Fresno County at the time the report
was written. No other warranties, either express or implied, are made as to the
professional advice provided under the terms of BSK's agreement with Client and included
in this report.
BSK Associates
-'
\\
-N-
BSK JOB G0518010F

FIGURE 2
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BORING
B'e
SCALE: I " = 300'
SITE PLAN
RMC PACIFIC MA'TERIALS
JESSE MORROW MOUNTAIN
APPENDIX

JMM Mine Stability Report.0911 PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

JMM Mine Stability Report.0911 PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

PRELIMINARY

SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

Project No. S9631-06-01

PRELIMINARY ROCK SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Dear Mr. Chadwick,

David W. Bieber, PGP, CEG, CHG

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................................................. 1

SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................................................................................................................... 2

FIELD EXPLORATION ..................................................................................................................... 2

PRELIMINARY SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES........................................................................ 5

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................. 8

PRELIMINARY ROCK SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

We performed the following scope of services in preparing this report:

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

PRELIMINARY SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Waste Pile Slopes

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Testing and Observation Services

Recommendations for Additional Work during Quarry Development

Perform seismic refraction surveys to determine rippability correlations from the

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Project No. S9631-06-01

September 15, 2011

Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

Process Facility (40 ac)

Shear Zone (Dashed where approximate)

Approximate Soil Sample Location

Qc Pleistocene nonmarine (Pleistocene)

Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

SITE GEOLOGIC MAP

Jesse Morrow Mountain Mine

PHOTOS NO. 1 & 2

GEOCON Project No. S9631-06-01

PHOTOS NO. 3 & 4

GEOCON Project No. S9631-06-01

PHOTOS NO. 5 & 6

GEOCON Project No. S9631-06-01

PHOTOS NO. 7 & 8

GEOCON Project No. S9631-06-01

Existing Conditions Aerial Photograph

V:\DATA2\Blocks\Benchmark CAD Library\Logos & Images\BR_Secondary_Logo_cmyk.jpg

4990 Hillsdale Circle, Suite 400