Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
Optimum design of plate girders subjected to highway bridge loading is
presented in this paper. The formulation is capable of handling composite or
noncomposite designs, shored or unshored construction, stiffened or
unstiffened design, symmetric or unsymmetric cross-section, simple or
continuous spans, and prismatic or nonprismatic girders. The bridge loading is
applied through influence line functions at selected points along the girder. The
design problem is constrained to satisfy the AASHTO specifications.
1 Introduction
The use of welded plate girders for short to medium span highway bridges
offers greatest flexibility in choosing the most economical section. They offer
the following advantages over the standard rolled sections [1].
Welded plate girders can be designed as long and as deep as required by the
design and fabrication method.
Rolled beams are of constant cross section along their length but in plate
girders dimensions can be easily varied if desired.
For composite girders, an unsymmetrical section offers considerable savings
in weight since typically the top flanges need only be large enough to
accommodate the shear connectors.
With advancement of welding technology the welded girders can be
fabricated on fully automatic welding lines with reasonable cost and uniform
quality control. Thus the delivery time for welded girders may be more
predictable than that for rolled shapes.
Use of optimization techniques is necessary to take advantage of this flexibility
in achieving the most economical design. Razani and Goble [2] studied the
optimum design of constant-depth plate girders based on 1961 AASHTO
specifications. The work was extended by Goble and DeSantis [3] to include
the composite sections. Holt and Heithecker [4] presented formulas for
optimum proportions for laterally supported symmetrical plate girders. The
problem was formulated on the basis of the 1967 American Institute of Steel
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
226
Structural Optimization
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
Structural Optimization
227
-sheer studs
top flange
plate
transverse
stiff ener
web plate-
bottom flange^
plate
I - section
Figure 1. Typical Highway Bridge Cross Section
Design forces and stresses
A composite girder must be analyzed under several different loadings
depending upon the construction method. An influence line analysis is required
for truck loads. Figures 2 shows typical bending moment diagrams. Bending
moments due to four different loadings are shown identified as MS
(noncomposite dead loads), Mrj (composite dead loads), M^ (positive live
loads), and M~ (negative live loads). The total design forces at any point are
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
228
Structural Optimization
the algebraic sum of the forces from different loadings. For additional details
see reference [10].
HS20-44
(k-ft.)
20
260
140
180
220
Bridge length,ft.
Bending moments from different loads
60
TOO
300
( k-ft.)
100
140
180
Bridge length,ft.
b. Design bending moments
220
260
3CT0
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
Structural Optimization
229
therefore, the flange widths are kept constant along the girder and are not
considered as design variables. Thus for each beam element or a group of
elements the design variables are defined as:
1)
Top flange area (At) 2)
bottom flange area (Ay)
3)
web depth (d\J
4)
web thickness (tw)
5)
stiffener spacing (a) in case of stiffened design
The volume of the steel beam and the stiffeners is the total weight to be
minimized. In most practical bridge designs, the cost is related to the weight of
the structure. Cost optimization requires estimation of construction cost that
depends on many variables such as, the contractor, construction equipment,
method of erection, fabrication, transportation, labor, etc. These variables
change continuously with time and differ from one location to another. The
volume (or weight) as an objective function is more universal and requires no
input or change in input parameters, which allows the designer to try different
designs in short time with less difficulty especially at the preliminary design
stage. The minimized volume/weight can then be transformed to a cost design
if the construction cost is determined.
The objective function is minimized subject to the bending stress, shear stress,
slenderness ratios, deflection, and depth limitations. It is necessary to set
reasonable and practical limits for the design variables to avoid calculations for
impractical values. A 5/16 inch plate thickness is the minimum allowed by the
AASHTO specifications. The constraints are applied to welded plate beams
with welding metal having an equal or greater ultimate strength than the base
metal. Flange plates must be joined end to end by full penetration butt welds.
The weld metals must conform to AASHTO standard specifications for
welding of structural steel for highway bridges.
4 Numerical Results
The interior girder of a 100 feet long highway bridge subjected to HS20-44
loading is designed with uniform section over the span. The design information
is shown in Figure 3. Different design options under the formulated AASHTO
constraints are used. The optimum sections are summarized in Table 1. It can
be seen that the unshored composite design reduced the beam cross section
area by 20% compared to the noncomposite design. The shored composite
design reduced the beam cross section even more by almost 30% of the
noncomposite design. More savings could be obtained with shored composite
design if narrower top flange is chosen because the flange width to thickness
constraint governed the design in this case. The savings will be more with the
composite design if the noncomposite design is obtained with the compression
flange assumed to be partially supported since the allowable compression
stress of the flange will be reduced and a larger flange area would be required
for moment resistance.
The beam depth also shows wide variation. The composite design as expected
offers shallower depth. Shored composite design reduces the depth by more
than 25% of the noncomposite design. The unstiffened design in this problem
has deeper beam than the stiffened design. This is because the unstiffened
design is optimized under both bending and shear stresses while the stiffened
design has abundant shear strength and the beam depth is mainly decided by
the moment action and is limited by depth to thickness ratio. The unstiffened
design requires larger web area for shear resistance and thus thicker and deeper
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
230
Structural Optimization
web plates. The stiffened design has smaller web area and larger flange areas
than the unstiffened design.
22ft.
I
8ft.
-*-
8ft.
. bt j
4
H
dw
(in)
tw
(in)
tt
(in)
Unstiffened
noncomposite
85.23 0.568 1..186
composite unshored 70-19 0.533 0.438
composite shored
59.25 0.503 0.438
Stiffened
noncomposite
77.27 0.473 1,.544
composite unshored 72.50 0.441 0.,502
composite shored
57.95 0.355 0.438
Stiffeners No. of
Spacing
Iters.
ratio
(a/dw)
tb
(in)
AS
(in 2)
0.694
76.52
62.58
57.72
11
73..16 1.5*
57.96 1.5*
51.43 1.5*
9
12
9
0.996
1.133
0.904
1.008
1.28
10
11
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
Structural Optimization
231
very short time. The CPU time for these design ranged from 7 to 12 seconds.
The optimization process took about 9 to 12 iterations.
Effect of Stiffeners Cost on Beam Design
The effect of stiffeners cost on girder design is shown here by designing the
girder with different values of stiffener cost coefficient (%) while keeping cost
coefficient of plate girder (Ci) constant. Only the noncomposite stiffened
design case is used to show this effect. The effect of C2 value on web depth is
shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that as the stiffeners cost increases the web
depth decrease. This is because the stiffeners are mainly a function of the web
depth. Good estimate for stiffeners cost and beam cost will results in an
economical beam design accounting for full construction cost.
.2
C2/C,
Figure 4. Change in girder depth with increase in stiffeners cost
Effect of Flange Width on the Optimum Beam Cross Section Area
Since the beam flange widths are not considered design variables in this paper
for the reasons mentioned in reference [10], it is important to study their effect
on the optimum girder cross section area. Figure 5 shows changes in the
optimum corss-section area with flange width.
Concluding Remarks
The ability to create and compare different designs for the same structure is the
real benefit from a general optimization based formulation. This approach
enables the designer to investigate different designs in relatively short time,
especially at the preliminary design stage.
The efficiency of the formulation presented in this study for optimum design of
bridge girders subjected to AASHTO loads is very encouraging. Similar
formulations can be applied to other type of bridges, especially long span
bridges, where the dead loads are dominant forces in the optimum design. A
similar formulation can also be applied to hybrid plate girders, box girders and
truss bridges.
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509
232
Structural Optimization
18
22
26
Flange width Jnches