Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
indri.wahyuningtyas@yahoo.com
#2
mrodiansyah@gmail.com
#3
juhnizar@gmail.com
I. INTRODUCTION
Indonesia has the very high level of consumption of
wheat in the form of a wheat flour, the consumption rate of
wheat flour in Indonesia each year has increased from 4.76
million tons in the year 2010 be 5.05 million tons in 2012 [3].
The consumption levels have not been supported by the
availability of raw material grain. Data from APTINDO at
2013, show that Indonesia still get the wheat from import and
the total number of that import always increase from 5.47
million tons in 2010 and became 6.25 million tons in 2012. As
we know that wheat flour cant be replaced by any type of
flour. Meanwhile, Indonesia has a big potential for cassava
which is can be transformed to cassava flour but there are no
modification technique yet for modification cassava flour to
has a same properties like wheat flour.
Indonesia had 1.22 million hectares of cassava plant in
2008 and increased in 2012 to 1.29 million hectares. Indonesia
also has a high productivity of cassava which was 19.98
million tons in 2007 and increased to 22.67 million tons in
2012 [21]. Those factors make Indonesia as a country that has
84.32% of average export number since 2007 to 2011 [8].
Based on that productivity number, cassava flour has a good
chance in food industry and another chemical industry.
There are 17% of amylose and 83% of amylopectin in
cassava flour [33], [36], meanwhile in wheat flour there are
25% of amylose and 75% of amylopectin [25]. The difference
of amylose and amylopectin composition in some flour will
affect to its texture and characteristic in some food that will be
produced [42]. The biggest obstacle that cassava flour has for
replace the wheat flour are the small of baking expantion
number, hard to dissolved in water [17], need a long time in
cooking process, the paste that produced is hard and not
transparent, the properties is too sticky, and can resist with
some acid [23], those things are the reasons why cassava flour
cant replace wheat flour yet. Because of that, the
modification is really needed to increase the properties of
cassava flour.
In general there are three methods that mostly applicated
in cassava flour modification process [19], by chemical
process with acid hydrolysis [4],[40], oxidation [35],
esterification [13], crosslinking [4]. By physical process with
drying, extrution, heating, cooling, cooking, and other
physical treatment [6], [32]. Also by enzymatic with adding
D.
E.
Viscosity Analysis
The viscosity analysis is done by heating process until
reach the temperature 80oC. The value of viscosity is
calculated by using a Viscometer Brookfield with the velocity
and spindle number which are appropriate. [2]
F.
SEM
FTIR
A.
The swelling power for each variable ranges from 7,513,4 g/g. The highest swelling power, 13,4 gr/gr, is obtained
from 40 rpm rotation velocity, 800C drying temperature, and
0,75% v/v concentration. Acid treatment caused amyl and
amyl pectin of starch partly elaborated [1]. Besides, it is
assumed that the swelling power increasing is caused by
hydrophilic character of the granule of starch, so it is able to
absorb water [24], and it is swelled when heated because of
the water [43].
When observed from the UV rotary rotation velocity, it
did not bring a quite significant result. It is appropriate to
research conducted by Chaudhuri et. Al., (2009) stated that
UV rotary rotation velocity did not significantly influence, so
the starch granule is not easily hydrated by water [34]. The
higher the ester concentration, the lower the swelling power of
modified starch. Acidity addition to the starch will be
followed by carbonyl (C-O) and carboxyl (C-O-O-H) cluster
addition. Carbonyl cluster influenced the amyl degradation
process. The higher the amyl degradation process is, the fewer
the paste is formed [20]. It might not show pasting profile
[28], which is finally made the swelling decrease.
B.
(a)
(b)
(c)
.
Fig. 11 The Effect of Temperature to Solubility
Abs
. 8
3000
2500
2000
1750
1500
1250
1000
750
4000
3500
Strach Ester
0
1
1 .0 5
500
1/cm
. 6
A b s
0 .9
Tapioca
0 .7 5
. 2
. 8
. 3
. 6
. 3
0 .6
E.
0 .4 5
0 .3
0 .1 5
3 5 0 0
3 0 0 0
2 5 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 7 5 0
1 5 0 0
1 2 5 0
1 0 0 0
7 5 0
5 0 0
1 /c m
1157.24
1072.37
1359.76
1419.56
1643.30
2933.68
4 0 0 0
S tra c h E s te r
3452.53
IV. CONCLUSIONS
0
The4000 modification
of
in
3500
3000
2500 tapioca,
2000
1750lactic
1500 acid
1250 and
1000 ethanol
750
500
Native-Strach
UV rotary
dryer influences the physical-chemistry of tapioca.1/cm
The best modification result is obtained in 40rpm rotation
velocity, 800C temperature, and 0,75% v/v concentration. The
result of swelling power, baking expansion, solubility,
viscosity, carboxyl cluster, and carbonyl cluster is 13,4 gr/gr;
8,38 ml/gr; 428 cP; 12,4 %; 0,259%; and 0,261% respectively.
FTIR analysis results show that there are carboxyl cluster
increasing (C-O) from 1072.37 cm-1 to 1078.16 cm-1, and
hydroxyl decreasing (O-H) from 3452.53 cm-1 to 3419.74 cm1
. SEM analysis results also show that modified tapioca
granule is smaller than modified pure tapioca. The size is
8,938 m 16,903 and 4.8m- 15.6m respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In this occasion we would like to thank to The Almighty
God who has blessed us, Dr. Siswo Sumardiono, S.T, M.T. as
the Head of Chemical Engineering Department of Diponegoro
University, and as our advisor, and all parties who have
helped us on finishing this research and journal.
[21]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
Xie, F., Yu, L., Su, B., Liu, P., Wang, J., Liu, H., dan Chen, L. 2009.
Rheological
Properties
Of
Starches
With
Different
Amylose/Amylopectin Ratios. Journal of Cereal Science. 49: 371377.
Zhu, Fan. 2014. Composition, Structure, Physicochemical
Properties,And Modifications Of Cassava Starch. Carbohydrate
Polymers.